User talk:Saintstephen000

February 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Camel (band) have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Camel (band) was changed by SkidMountTubularFrame (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.864005 on 2021-02-12T02:16:21+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:16, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

How to cite sources

Hi, I modified your edit to Sandra Bullock by changing the external URL that you added to a reference. You might find User:Nick Moyes/Easier Referencing for Beginners helpful. Cheers! Schazjmd (talk) 13:47, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Requesting some help

Greetings,

Is it ok to make a help request regarding women related articles if following topics interest you?

Requesting your visit to the article Women's shelter and a Peer review there of

I am also looking for first level copy edit support @ Draft:2021 Minar-e-Pakistan mass sexual assault

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 10:14, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

thank you for your kind request, but i don't have the actual technical skills to help with that. however, I'm checking out out. good day SkidMountTubularFrame (talk) 06:03, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi,i know you undo my edit of One Last Time (Ariana Grande song) two times,but according to Billboard hot 100,it charted No.13,not No.1,I hope you can see the link of Billboard charts and change it the right way,thanks. Exemleer (talk) 09:11, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Iot ritual.jpeg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Iot ritual.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vladlen Manilov ✉ / 06:10, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

W.A.S.P.

Hello, I have reverted your changes over at W.A.S.P. based on your claim that "Forever Free" and "Mean Man" were not "notable" because they didn't chart. They both charted (at least in Europe) according to W.A.S.P. discography, meaning they are "notable" enough to be mentioned among the band's "notable" songs and therefore I restored them in the article. Not only that, but "Forever Free" and "Mean Man" had some airplay on radio or MTV back in at least 1989, is that not "notable" enough? If you disagree, you might want to consider taking it over to Talk:W.A.S.P. (band) rather than engaging in an edit war, otherwise stop removing "Forever Free" and "Mean Man" from the list of W.A.S.P.'s "notable" songs. Thanks. Have a great day! MetalDiablo666 (talk) 17:50, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

puppet, much? Saintstephen000 (talk) 21:50, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited GypsyCrusader, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Romani. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Dylan Thomas (guitarist) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Dylan Thomas (guitarist), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ––FormalDude talk 09:55, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

thank you for the help! SkidMountTubularFrame (talk) 01:13, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Aikens

...is a licensed pilot, otherwise there would be no license for the FAA to revoke. MartinezMD (talk) 22:38, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

nope. not a licenced pilot. SkidMountTubularFrame (talk) 22:47, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Yes he was. Replied in the article's talk page. MartinezMD (talk) 23:56, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Iranian politics general sanctions notification

Please read this notification carefully: it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions to curtail disruption in articles related to post-1978 Iranian politics, broadly construed. Before continuing to make edits that involve this topic, please read the full description of these sanctions here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

FYI about your revert at People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran, which is technically a violation [1]. Please discuss edits that have been reverted in the talk page and try to get some consensus before adding them back to the article. Thanks. Fad Ariff (talk) 12:00, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

thank you for the heads up. definitely taking note. SkidMountTubularFrame (talk)

discrete parts

as written, the word 'parts' used twice in a longer sentence seemed confusing on the first read, but now 'discrete parts' almost seems redundant. thank you for clearing that up SkidMountTubularFrame (talk) 22:35, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

"Sandboxing articles"

Hi there, you've indicated that you intend to "sandbox" articles and rewrite them. Please first spend some time considering the Wikipedia policies that encourage editors to thoroughly discuss article issues on the talk pages before they are "sandboxed". I haven't seen much discussion by you on the articles that I believe you intend to sandbox. But i'd be happy to discuss further on those talk pages once you initiate that. Thanks so much.

Farr4h2004 (talk) 22:11, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

thanks for your suggestions regarding my rewrite. it's surely welcome. as this is a collaborative project, and as i rewrite articles for style, npov, sources, etc, and as i am a disinterested editor, I'm sure you'll have lots of good ideas. I'm not an interested editor in the topic. totally non aligned.

thanks again.SkidMountTubularFrame (talk)

They are not just my concerns. Multiple editors have the concerns as it’s unusual to rewrite an entire article. Please refrain. And if you have any issues do as you should by discussing them on the talk pages. Thank you so much. Farr4h2004 (talk) 17:28, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

i rewrite entire articles for style, noov, sourcing, prose, ect.

your seem to be very strident as regards your various multiple edits, and i understand how that can be hard.

your request is denied.

SkidMountTubularFrame (talk) 17:42, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Ok do as you like. I’ll have to report for wiki violations given your lack of discussion on the issues per wiki policies. Again, your use of “us” is also suspect. Farr4h2004 (talk) 18:06, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

For the record, you’ve been asked by other users to discuss your issues on the article talk pages and have not done so. Farr4h2004 (talk) 18:16, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

not sure why your are continuing to harass me into not editing a page, but please stop.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Ownership_of_content SkidMountTubularFrame (talk) 18:30, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi, you keep coming on my talk page. Again, I have asked you to discuss your article issues on the ARTICLE talk page. Not my talk page. Please do so. Farr4h2004 (talk) 21:38, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

i don't know what you mean. you send me a message like this one, it shows up on a link at the top of the page, i click it and respond politely and firmly, as I'm doing now. i did not initiate or perpetuate the exchange you've engaged me in. i will simply block you, if that's ok. thanks again for your assistance. SkidMountTubularFrame (talk)

Propose Barney Miller "genre" Edit: 2022-06-03

Greetings --

The reason for the "interesting" edit summary was in response to MarnetteDI's rejection of the same edit, last week (please review the Barney Miller Talk Page entry, "Barney Miller 'genre' Discussion"), where he/she provided no rationale for why such a rudimentary, base-level edit requires a source. The new content regards nothing more than understanding and identification of literary devices; any given individual with associated fundamental knowledge could make such an assessment. It would seem a "source" per se, within this context, is actually nothing more than validating one's capacity for knowledge -- which is wholly unnecessary.

I kindly ask that you re-instate the requested edit, the content of which is accurate.

Regards, J. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.10.164.56 (talk) 16:23, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

interesting take, one with which the arbitration kids will find disagreement. let me again check the relevant, and work through the logic. SkidMountTubularFrame (talk) 16:36, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

I can't do it. I agree with your basic premise, but am unable to create an exception to unsourced categorizing. Barney Miller has element you describe, but to drop that into the category churn, it needs more than your obvious thoughtful knowledge and my agreement. an example, say an editor watched bacharach perform on a living room piano songs later presented as Lennon McCartney compositions. that is notable, would be attested to by a handful of people, and would be factual let's say. but it would be a claim requiring similarly strong sources. i suggest you identify all series thought of as dramatic comedy but with script and directorial elements you have identified, and just do it. SkidMountTubularFrame (talk) 20:33, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for taking the time to offer a detailed response — very much appreciated.

First, I would offer that my request is not a genre classification change; rather, my request is to simply qualify the classification, "sitcom", early in the narrative so the reader has a more accurate understanding regarding the show’s unique content. (Aside from All In The Family and M*A*S*H no other long-term "sitcom" at that time routinely provided consequential (and at times pivotal) relevant topics in an earnest, effected manner.) Second, it all seems rather silly that my objective opinions are deemed invalid; yet, seemingly given internet articles smitten with blatant inaccuracies and misleading generalizations (for instance, calling all the detectives "quirky" or "off the wall", and referring to Inspector Lugar as a "racist" [Arnold would clearly never cast such a character as a member of the 12th]) would seem more likely to receive the Wikipedia Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval as it were...

My muted tirade aside, I spent about 45 internet minutes and found a few articles to support my opinion and have provided the sources. (To sound haughty, I doubt any one of those writers has either watched or studied the show as much as I have; and still maintain that my unbiased opinion is as valid as the opinions of the cited writers.)

Thanks again! 172.10.164.56 (talk) 00:56, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Adder stone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Adder.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

June 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Shed Seven. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Stesmo (talk) 04:05, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for the heads up on that, and your instruction. I was trying to find places where the content couldbe altered to fit extant citations, and delete content for which i could not find an actual citation especially in promotional non notable.

I'll look at the attempts for reference. SkidMountTubularFrame (talk)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Aspen Education Group, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Stesmo (talk) 04:40, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

i thought the responses from the respondent were in the pdf documents cited in the same paragraph from the filings from the l petitioner, but should have included the page and line from the document.

my concern was the older lawsuits without any information about the eventual settlement, and wanting to at least give the last filing from accused. it reads as a group of disgruntled parents and teens, verses a group of very scurrilous criminals, and am trying to source some of the thousands of clients who perhaps had other experiences. thank you for some new reading material. it's a climb. SkidMountTubularFrame (talk)

Template removal

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Manipulation (psychology), without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you.

Edits which remove templates should not be flagged as minor. The same applies for removing the disambiguation template. There is an ongoing discussion at DRN here. Darcyisverycute (talk) 01:56, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

we fixed it, therefore dispute settled. thank you for helping edit Wikipedia SkidMountTubularFrame (talk)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Melanie Zanona (July 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Numberguy6 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Melanie Zanona and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Numberguy6 (talk) 19:05, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Saintstephen000! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Numberguy6 (talk) 19:05, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Brock Pierce

added a link pointing to FEC

The Groundlings

added a link pointing to Variety

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brock Pierce, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FEC.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Dylan Thomas (guitarist)

Hello, Saintstephen000. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dylan Thomas (guitarist), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:03, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Page move to FBI investigation of Donald Trump and classified materials

On what consensus did you base that move? --Valjean (talk) (PING me) 18:47, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

good morning, and thanks for helping me edit Wikipedia!

i have been reading and re-reading suggestions from other editors and watching data come across the desk here.

people inclined to snowball will debate the move, but i think it's non controversial and solid.

Saintstephen000 (talk)

Please answer the question and provide a diff to the discussion where the consensus for the move is found.

A thread has been opened about this at the article talk page, so you need to comment there immediately. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 19:32, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

i though your question was rhetorical, as an experienced editor like yourself would know i moved it boldly without discussing it. seemed non controversial, now the various persons more inclined to bureaucracy and debate can have at it. thanks for the suggestions, and enjoy helping me edit Wikipedia!

Saintstephen000 (talk)

Page moves are rarely a place to apply BOLD. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 19:59, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

noted Saintstephen000 (talk)

It depends on the page. Anything about hot American cable news is almost always "up for debate". But unilaterally rewriting Cypriot political history from 2004 is "almost too easy". InedibleHulk (talk) 22:20, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

it's been a learning experience and the feedback has been helpful. it's been instructive watching this article expand organically, the process, arguments, and prose. on good behavior, Saintstephen000 (talk)

Reply on the Speed of Light

A citation is absolutely needed because every textbook you claim says this is wrong. It specifically has occurred in history because of a misunderstanding of energy and information, as well as the difference between an idealized classical vacuum and the real life exotic quantum vacuum that has been proven to exist today. Specifically, special relativity only states that all observers, irrespective of their relative motions will all measure the speed of light as the same number in vacuum, and that is it! It says nothing more. A corollary to this is that a classical point mass will take infinite energy to reach the speed of light. This says nothing about energy in general or more abstractly, "information". MMmpds (talk) 23:55, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

David W. Dugan

Hello,

I see you deleted the picture for David W. Dugan I inserted for his profile. The reason you gave was fair usage claims. Could you explain what the issue is so I can try to correct it? Thank you

MIAJudges (talk) 04:42, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

Completely a mistake, and i apologize

Saintstephen000 (talk)

Adding comments to RfCs

You added a comment to an RfC at FBI search of Mar-a-Lago. This is the second time I noticed that you're not using the proper format, so I assume you're not aware of it. Please, start your line with an asterisk * and optionally Support or Oppose or just add whatever comment you want to make. After the last word of your comment, click the signature button in the bottom line of the editor to sign and date the comment. Examples:

• Support. Whatever. Text text text. Space4Time3Continuum2x (talk) 11:10, 28 August 2022 (UTC) or
• Wait. Blend into eventual featured article 'Trial and Incarceration of...' Space4Time3Continuum2x (talk) 11:10, 28 August 2022 (UTC) (I can only sign with my own name.:)

Thank you in the name of the eventual closer of the RfC. Space4Time3Continuum2x (talk) 11:10, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

• Thank you! Saintstephen000 (talk) 14:36, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Unexplained reverts

You are making unexplained reverts very frequently.[2] I would ask you to stop it. 103.240.204.88 (talk) 05:41, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

We noticed you're making contributions on an article about which you seem both knowledgeable and passionate. Thanks for helping! A friendly suggestion: approach your addition to the encyclopedia as though it were an important school assignment worthy of your precious time. Gather your sources, scribble a draft, let someone suggest edits, write it all down, tidy it all up, make sure it's sourced (make dam'd sure it's sourced) and the changes you're attempting will likely find a way into the article, given both factual and appropriately sourced.

Thanks again for building a truly unique encyclopedia, Saintstephen000 (talk)

You continue to do this - and especially with controversial unexplained reverts, you should not. 2603:7000:2101:AA00:714F:9C6C:35A3:BFB0 (talk) 22:58, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Urdu revert

Because you are using mobile view, you probably didn't see the purpose of my edit that you reverted.[3] With desktop view and a window width of 1280 or more, the "See also" section heading is to the right of the last photo; the list wraps around the photo to the left margin. "Clear" forces the "See also" section to begin below the image so it's all in one column on the left, like it should be.

With a window width of about 900 or less, the References section is all in one narrow column between the left margin and the Official Languages box on the right. "Clear" forces the References section to begin below the boxes so that the full window width is used.

Or maybe you saw a problem that I didn't see? 63.226.230.9 (talk) 14:46, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

no, you are entirely correct. thank you for helping me. Saintstephen000 (talk)

September 2022

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Inspector Eevee (talk) 19:05, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

thank you for the heads up on that resource.

Saintstephen000 (talk)

Michael Gaughan (Irish republican)

Sorry, I think I edit-conflicted with you there. John (talk) 18:24, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

i thought i might have stumbled into a border clash👍😁 Saintstephen000 (talk) 18:26, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Questions,

What talk section are you talking about? Some of the sources that are cited have questionable information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:4EA0:D80:718D:55A2:184D:1322 (talk) 19:24, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

• you seem quite passionate as regards this topic, whereas we are just an encyclopedist without bias.

use your knowledge to make solid cited additions to this topic, that would be our suggestion. be safe out there, Saintstephen000 (talk)

Revert

Why did you revert my edit to Mohammed Siraj ? 2402:3A80:198B:654D:678:5634:1232:5476 (talk) 15:32, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

unsourced name change needed source. i can't find one. Saintstephen000 (talk) 15:34, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

That's not my problem bitch. 2402:3A80:198B:654D:678:5634:1232:5476 (talk) 15:37, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

no need for vulgarity. please be nice. thank you, Saintstephen000 (talk)

October 2022

Hi, sorry, if you saw my previous message, it was in error, I clicked the wrong username. Equine-man (talk) 06:40, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Totally thanks! Keep me on my toes.

Saintstephen000 (talk)

Hello! I'm Opus 113. Your recent edit(s) to the page George Harrison appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Opus 113 (talk) 17:08, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

IDEA Scuba

I am the owner of idea scuba USA I have edited the page and somebody keeps deleting my edits I do not appreciate that. 69.73.94.36 (talk) 20:06, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

I would like to know why you are deleting facts? I own IDEA Scuba and edited it but you keep deleting? Rickbutler2626 (talk) 21:45, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

probably unsourced additions. please cite your additions.

Saintstephen000 (talk)

Why did you remove information?

Hello, I’m wondering why you removed factual information from Bob McBride’s wiki page? This is information that has been clearly missing for a very long time and can easily be confirmed through marriage and birth records. Legally, Bob McBride has one biological daughter whom he had with his wife Penelope McBride. The two worked very hard to keep their daughter out of the spotlight and media as she was growing up. She is well know as his daughter within Bob’s inner circles of the music industry. TreasureMcBride (talk) 16:54, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

If it's easily sourced, then source it, please

Uncited biographical information will be removed.

Saintstephen000 (talk)

Perhaps you could be of help here. How would one cite something like this? Trying to do the right thing here - because there is not only missing information on his page but also seems to be biological offspring claims that are also not proven. I ask in the spirit of making sure a deceased individual has accurate information on his wiki page. For example this statement “ He has a daughter, Elisa “ is missing a citation. (There is no evidence of this person’s biological relationship to Bob McBride cited.) TreasureMcBride (talk) 05:40, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

take responsibility for your additions. please don't add uncited information. thank you. Saintstephen000 (talk)

Unexplained reversion

Hello—I noticed that you reverted this edit (which I made without realizing I was logged out). As per WP:REVEXP, could you explain why you reverted it, please? AppallingSnow (talk) 14:14, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

• i think it was for bias, and language lacking in precision.

it's arguable, and you could be correct.

convicted and imprisoned felon?

thank you for helping me. Saintstephen000 (talk)

Du Zheng Zhe

Hey, I hope to edit 'Ryan Tu' because his credited screen name in Taiwan in "Du Zheng Zhe" or "Tu Cheng Che" and would like to make this person's credit's as accurate as possible. Superbon (talk) 21:00, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

we seem to be going with the english language cited press version. thank you for helping create a fantastic encyclopedia. Saintstephen000 (talk)

explain why you reverted my Hill Street Blues edits

. 2.86.222.255 (talk) 04:43, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

i might have been reverting a removal of previously cited and sourced content. i will look into it. thank you for the heads up. Saintstephen000 (talk)

My edits are based on fact. Your edits are harmful and seem rooted in bias.

If you wish to continue editing the page please do so with relevant life events and not instances that do not add substance to the biography. If you want to add different referenced material that is fine, but I do ask that you remove that article from TheGrio. They state that she has experienced colorism, but by definition that is not true because colorism is discrimination against someone with a darker skin tone than you. Though provided by TheGrio.com, that information is incorrect. She has many reliable articles about her family struggles with money, wanting to be a ballet dancer, moving a lot because her dad was an aspiring actor too, etc. I tried adding that but you keep removing it, so if it is done incorrectly on my part I ask that you edit it to be done correctly. But that is the information is important to her story and should be included in her Early Life section instead a singular quote that is being used to paint her in a bad light. 2601:14D:8B80:1E50:C918:BBA1:CC35:4D1F (talk) 08:06, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

• leaving in the sourced content. Saintstephen000 (talk) 15:46, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Nov 22

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Slatersteven (talk) 10:29, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

where exactly do you find evidence for saintstephen000 engaging in an edit war?

he is a vandalism reverter, perhaps you're referring to someone with a specific bone to pick. we don't play favorites.

thanks for pointing in the direction of your suggestion, Saintstephen000 (talk)

• Your complaint has been addressed, your oddly captioned photo revision will remain in the article.

thank you for taking the time to bring this to our attention, re: geijutsu wa bakuhatsu da.

Saintstephen000 (talk)

You might also need to read wp:sock, as all of the above was added by you, but appears to be trying to pretend to not be you. As to where, [[4]], first edit (which changed what another user has written) [[5]] 1st revert, [[6]] 2nd revert. Thus I warned you before you got to 3RR (as in revert, and not just altering what other users had written). Slatersteven (talk) 12:53, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

kindly explain what are you on about? we have no idea what you're referencing, why you seem angry, or why you're communicating with us at this point. we wish you well, Saintstephen000 (talk)

I am not angry, I am telling you that you might be seen as breaching our policies. I am communicating with you at this point in order to inform you so that you do not end up with some kind of sanction. But fine. This is now a warning if you continue to post in a way that seems to look like more than one person, or if you continue to edit war I will report you. I will not warn you again. Slatersteven (talk) 11:52, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

we function as a multiplicity. we celebrate the fractal nature of the human psyche. we speak in the royal we because we simply are. we don't have time for your suggestions, regardless of how well intended. we wish you well, all of us. Saintstephen000 (talk) please leave us alone. again, you don't seem to understand what we do

Disambiguation link notification for November 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Michael Strank, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ruthenian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Russia demographics

My apologies for reverting the modifications by Mellk while not logged in. I keep an eye on this fairly sensitive page to try to keep it reasonably troll-free. Bungler91 (talk) 20:55, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

i know nothing regarding the topic, outside of my field, thank you for the corrections. Saintstephen000 (talk)

@Bungler91: Please see WP:CITE. Also, the growth rate is different to the natural increase rate. Mellk (talk) 02:28, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

thank you for pointing towards a wiki policy, and for attempting unbiased accuracy when editing. anything you can do to help us with our online encyclopedia is certainly welcome.Saintstephen000 (talk)

November 2022

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Raccoonpox virus: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 19:14, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

*thank you for the suggestion!

Saintstephen000 (talk)

Brittany Dawn

Thank you for fixing the Brittany Dawn article. I believe someone connected to this article has been removing content without discussion. I did restore some of it and did remove other content that isn't relevant to the article. If it doesn't look right, make a BOLD edit. Thanks, cookie monster 755 19:31, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

as is often the case with biographies, one persons fish is another person's whale. we appreciate you're helping keep the encyclopedia accurate. Saintstephen000 (talk)

Jethro Tull

Hello, I reverted your recent edit to Jethro Tull as it suggests the current line up operates under the title you'd provided of 'Ian Anderson and the Jethro Tull Band'. I've seen no evidence that this is the case. If you do have evidence, it should be provided with the change. Stroness (talk) 15:36, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

my mistake, thank you for the correction. Saintstephen000 (talk)

Reverting/Undo Guidance

Hello. I noticed you were helping clean up Wikipedia by undoing vandalism which great. And I saw that you undid several edits on the same article back to back. There is a way to undo multiple edits at once. Check out WP:UNDO and it will tell you how to do it. Wanted to say something so you don't get flagged for WP:EDITWAR. Just wanted to make sure you knew. If you have any questions feel free to ask. Have a good one. WanderingSeer (talk) 15:29, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

thank you for the heads up, we appreciate your insight. Saintstephen000 (talk)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Schomberg, Ontario, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Equestrian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

fixed. Saintstephen000 (talk)

Warn templates

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Tana (rapper): you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. --DB1729^talk 05:08, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

it is a nice standardization, the availability of forms and such. thank you Saintstephen000 (talk)

Disambiguation link notification for December 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Harlan County, Kentucky, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Jones.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Signature date missing

Hi Saintstephen000, please make sure that your signature (four tildes! ~~~~) contains the current date, as all other signatures you'll see around do. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:22, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Melanie Zanona

Hello, Saintstephen000. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Melanie Zanona, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Ana Mena

Hi, why did you removed some of the information from the article? Her music certifications are shown in the discography section, where all the references are correctly credited by the corresponding certification body database / link: Promusicae, FIMI, SNEP, etc. Furthermore, she is a Top5 Streaming Spanish female artist in Spain according to Spotify and Sony. What's wrong? 79.150.252.193 (talk) 14:16, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

i rechecked my edit, and you are absolutely correct. thank you for the correction, Saintstephen000 (talk)

Pavel Evgenevich PRIGOZHIN

Hello Saintstephen000, noticing this edit and comment, you might wish to take a look at Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/883|Pavel Evgenevich PRIGOZHIN, Pavel Prigozhin is the son of Yevgeniy Prigozhin, a prominent Russian businessman with close ties to President Putin and the Russian Ministry of Defence. Yevgeniy Prigozhin is the funder and unofficial head of the Wagner Group, a Russia-based unincorporated military entity responsible for the deployment of mercenaries in Ukraine. GreetsConcord, also known as KOMBINAT PITANIYA KONKORD OOO, a company which Yevgeniy Prigozhin founded and owned until November 2019, and a group of other companies with ties to him, including Concord Management and Consulting LLC and Megaline LLC, have been benefitting from large public contracts with the Russian Ministry of Defence following the illegal annexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation and the occupation of Eastern Ukraine by Russia-backed separatists. Lotje (talk) 09:23, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

sounds like they are worthy of their own article. I'll read the link, thank you for taking the time to bring that to our attention, Saintstephen000 (talk)

You are very welcome :-) Lotje (talk) 12:23, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Archdiocese of Ho Chi Minh City edits

Hello Saintstephen000, I recently attempted to update the titular see of Arsennaria and the Archdiocese of Ho Chi Minh city to reflect the recent (as of this morning) installation of the newest auxiliary bishop of the Archdiocese, Joseph Bui Cong Trac, whose titular see is Arsennaria. It has been reverted to the original, whilst the source in the Arsennaria article : http://www.catholic-hierarchy.org/diocese/d3a91.html has been updated to reflect the latest change.

His Vietnamese Wikipedia is as follows: https://vi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giuse_B%C3%B9i_C%C3%B4ng_Tr%C3%A1c

I know of this change first hand, since I attended the consecration Mass for his installation just a couple of hours ago. Mammothnguyen93 (talk) 06:28, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

thank you for helping edit. i may have misunderstood your intent, thanks for the information, Saintstephen000 (talk)

Colombian actor Fabio Restrepo

You're an ignorant. Read this https://www.eltiempo.com/cultura/cine-y-tv/murio-andres-restrepo-hijo-del-actor-fabio-restrepo-por-covid-19-646839 https://mag.elcomercio.pe/fama/andres-restrepo-el-actor-de-la-reina-del-flow-que-murio-de-covid-19-en-medellin-celebs-de-colombia-nnda-nnlt-noticia/ https://www.elespectador.com/entretenimiento/gente/muere-andres-restrepo-productor-e-hijo-de-fabio-restrepo/ instead of deleting. JeanCastì (talk) 20:43, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

January 2023

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Troubled teen industry does not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits a summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! 1keyhole (talk) 02:51, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Kirby Smart

Do you need me to fix the page? --DB1729^talk 04:51, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Fixed[7]. Thanks for your efforts. --DB1729^talk 04:57, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

January 2023

Hello, I'm PizzaKing13. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Brandon Staley have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. PizzaKing13 ^¡Hablame! 04:51, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

no, thank you.

Saintstephen000 (talk)

Stop

Stop changing my edits to the Tyler Styer page or I will report you. 86.19.195.203 (talk) 05:02, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

thank you for taking the time to help us create an excellent online encyclopedia.

perhaps the unsourced biographical information needs a source? have an excellent day, Saintstephen000 (talk)

Why did you delete my edit?

After the Islamization of the Ilkhanate, the Khan used a Persian name instead of Mongolian, and the original Mongolian language had no meaning and origin, which did not meet the standards of Wikipedia. As for adai khan, I supplemented the notes in the history book. His source is already controversial, why should it be deleted? 103.38.254.228 (talk) 07:09, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

thank you for the information. Saintstephen000 (talk)

A bad space over there. TY

Tq. 2001:448A:20A0:E680:3587:E7CC:78BD:30F (talk) 11:45, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Yang_(surname)&diff=prev&oldid=1135227129

Do you know tiping space? Study plewas???!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:448A:20A0:E680:3587:E7CC:78BD:30F (talk) 11:47, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

Tony Adams

It is accepted on Wikipedia to include lineage of people. Mr Adams's lineage is of particular interest as his mother was a sporting celebrity, and his father Norwegian. Both have Wikipedia articles

(86.146.100.128 (talk) 19:24, 24 January 2023 (UTC))

Thank you for taking the time to help us correctly correct wikipedia. To correct the non controversial edit, add the sourced reference as an inline citation. Wikipedia can't use itself as a source, as you well-understand Biographical information needs near constant vigilance, as you can imagine. Saintstephen000 (talk)

Your draft article, Draft:Melanie Zanona

Hello, Saintstephen000. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Melanie Zanona".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:31, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Jelena Dokic: war refugee

Jelena Dokic and her family did not 'decide' to leave Osijek in 1991. The war was already raging for six months when they were forced to flee in a brutal ethnic-cleansing campaign against Serbian civilians, and mixed-marriage families. Its highly offensive to claim otherwise. You cant claim in the 'early life' section that her family lived in harsh circumstances in Sombor (they were homeless war refugees), without elaborating on the reasons why they were were forced to be in that situation. The family arrived in Australia on a refugee VISA, yet the article wants us to believe that they just 'decided' to leave their home one day. 110.174.45.235 (talk) 00:51, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

thanks for taking the time to the encyclopedia more accurate.

just source your assertion,and I'm sure it will be fine. Saintstephen000 (talk)

i looked at it again, because this story is compelling. of course, you are correct. we're going back to the article, and checking it throughout for content. thanks again Saintstephen000 (talk) 07:12, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Notice

109.171.194.161 (talk) 05:17, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

We noticed you're making contributions on an article about which you seem both knowledgeable and passionate, corruption in the Indian subcontinent. Thanks for helping! A friendly suggestion: approach your addition to the encyclopedia as though it were an important school assignment worthy of your precious time. Gather your sources, scribble a draft, let someone suggest edits, write it all down, tidy it all up, make sure it's sourced (make dam'd sure it's sourced) and the changes you're attempting will likely find a way into the article, given both factual and appropriately sourced.

Thanks again for building a truly unique encyclopedia, Saintstephen000 (talk) 05:24, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Daniel Case (talk) 07:59, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Sorry I had to do this; you seem like a pretty reasonable guy, but a) this is within a contentious topic area and b) your reverts do not fall under the WP:3RRNO exceptions.

Next time something like this happens, consider requesting protection instead (which in this case you won't have to; I will be putting the article under protection after I'm done with you and the IP). Daniel Case (talk) 07:59, 5 February 2023 (UTC) I've reviewed my contributions and agree with your assessment and course of action. thanks for the heads up, s Saintstephen000 (talk) 20:23, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Walfredo Reyes, Jr page

Hello, I am Walfredo Reyes, Jr's wife. He had asked me to include the brief statement about our wedding on his page. If you would be so kind as to not remove it again, both Wally and I would be appreciative. Kind regards, Kirsten de los Reyes Funshine0323 (talk) 19:08, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

could you point us to a wedding announcement or other materials to source the claim, we could create for you a citation for the claim. Saintstephen000 (talk) 20:26, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Hi! Being that it was literally the week the world shut down, we were married in the back yard of a neighbor's home with 10 people. I can certainly supply or marriage license it that is necessary. What we would appreciate is that the exact location of our whereabouts - Newport, KY - be omitted. Funshine0323 (talk) 07:43, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

If you really need reassurance, check out their new documentary - The Last Band on Stage - our wedding/marriage is highlighted. Funshine0323 (talk) 07:49, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

hi, and thanks for helping us edit Wikipedia. if you have acceptable citations for claims, yes please! it's important that your additions are correctly sourced, you seem to have an interest in this topic. which makes it even more important that your addition is perfect. better to add nothing than something wrong, best wishes to you, Saintstephen000 (talk) 07:54, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Sheba

Saba was older than 1000 BC, and European missions indicate that it was very old, some sources (1) Reports of the German Archaeological Institute + Al-Watan Magazine - New Discoveries - Dr. Youssef Mohamed Abdel Issue 5 / year 11 / June 1988 AD. (2) History of the ancient kingdoms in the south of the Arabian Peninsula - Klaus Scheibmann - p. 66 - translation center Studies - 2001 AD. (3) Report of the activities of the German Archaeological Institute in Berlin - Al-Thawra Newspaper - Sana'a - Issue 5/1/1984 AD. (4) Report of the Dutch Physical Laboratory - Al Ittihad Magazine - 11/23/1988. - Zon777 (talk) 08:31, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

thanks for engaging. there isn't academic consensus to date this any earlier, although there have been notable attempts. perhaps find correct sources and cite a paragraph speaking to the legendary status and various interpretations of archeological discoveries. thanks for helping edit wikipedia, Saintstephen000 (talk) 05:45, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Changes made, new user

Hello, Thanks for your messages. I’m the person that has been adding some content with chart positions to record releases by British group, Ride. Yes, I do have knowledge on them, having followed the group for over thirty years. I know every release, date, label info etc, as I do with many other bands from that era. I didn’t realise that UK chart positions needed citations because this information is freely available on the U.K. charts website. I’m a newbie to editing on Wiki, so I’m not even sure if this is how I respond to you correctly. Over the weekend, I’ll take some time to read up and learn. Thanks for your advice and understanding. 2A00:23C7:8600:1D01:C483:2924:F6F:CAEC (talk) 05:36, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

you sincerely rock. happy editing, Saintstephen000 (talk) 05:45, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Alexandra Lugaro

PLEASE REFRAIN FROM WRITING LIES AND CONTROVERSY YOU DO NOT KNOW THIS PERSON .

Tmmusgrove (talk) 18:16, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

good mod

+rep 60.240.166.162 (talk) 23:58, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

please be a good contributor to our encyclopedia. Saintstephen000 (talk) 23:59, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Your opinion on User:DMNE2020’s edits

The user mass reverted all of your edits to a page. What do you think? I am not sure what to do. Illusion Flame (talk) 00:30, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

I edited my own page with publicly verifiable information. And then some unknown person removed all my edits. Why? DMNE2020 (talk) 00:42, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

if it's a biographical article with next to no references, it's likely to be contentious. persons close to articles sometimes believe fish are actually whales. we really edit articles within our field of expertise; we have no editorial opinion outside the prime directive. 👍 thanks for the heads up,

Saintstephen000 (talk) 00:34, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

• rarely edit articles within our field Saintstephen000 (talk) 00:35, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

  Why did you remove my edits to my page? DMNE2020 (talk) 00:42, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Judging by this edit summary, this user is going to end up being a competence issue. There are so many edits that I can't say for sure, but I think DMNE2020 may have partially self-reverted. --Roundish ⋆tc) 00:41, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

User deleting facts

This user is trying to hide the truth by deleting recently discovered facts off pages 49.224.106.115 (talk) 03:15, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Hello, thank you for helping up edit Wikipedia. have a nice day,

Saintstephen000 (talk) 03:17, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Edits to Katie Feeney page

Hello, I hope you are doing well. I’ve noticed my contributions to the “Katie Feeney” article keep getting reverted due to purported lack of sources. I have added primary sources each time to support the added text. Could you please explain why these changes are getting reverted each time? They are accurate and supported by the sources. Thank you. 207.38.255.10 (talk) 02:14, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

thanks for helping edit Wikipedia. the lede is fine as is, the edits you are creating are for the purpose of subtle mocking, and will be removed. have a Wikipedia day, Saintstephen000 (talk) 02:17, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Thanks. Totally did not intend for it to be subtle mocking—-it is just the truth. The current lede doesn’t do her work justice.

We noticed you're making contributions on an article about which you seem both knowledgeable and passionate. Thanks for helping! A friendly suggestion: approach your addition to the encyclopedia as though it were an important school assignment worthy of your precious time. Gather your sources, scribble a draft, let someone suggest edits, write it all down, tidy it all up, make sure it's sourced (make dam'd sure it's sourced) and the changes you're attempting will likely find a way into the article, given both factual and appropriately sourced.

Thanks again for building a truly unique encyclopedia, Saintstephen000 (talk) 02:23, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Saad Lamjarred.

You deleted an edit on Lamjarred. What was your thinking on the issue? 49.224.69.66 (talk) 02:25, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

it doesn't belong in the lede. sufficiently covered in its own section.

Saintstephen000 (talk) 02:28, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

White space lede

What does the edit summary of “white space lede” mean? ComplexApe (talk) 03:28, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

hello fellow Wikipedia editor!

moved content to after the info box would be a better description, and thank you for asking. have a Wikipedia day, Saintstephen000 (talk)

Reminder: always double-check to which revision you're reverting

In Amazing Stories (1985 TV series) you reverted my second revision rather than my original one. While I do still contend that for anthology series this parameter should only be used for composers whose work was featured prominently througout a significant number/percentage of episodes as the infobox should be a summary rather than anything exhaustive, I realize this is better left for community discussion (as started in Template talk:Infobox television). 2803:4600:1116:12E7:88B7:D04F:9C79:4C41 (talk) 07:53, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Good afternoon, thanks for the heads up. I am of the mind that main theme composer would go to the infobox with the composers of individual episodes background music coming later in the article. That's quite a notable list, regardless. Cordially, Saintstephen000 (talk)

March 2023

Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to Brian Keith have been removed because you cited the information you added to another Wikipedia article or an external wiki. As discussed at WP:CIRCULAR and WP:SPS, Wikipedia and other wikis should not be used in citations because they are not considered reliable sources. You are welcome to re-add the information using a different reference, perhaps from the article you originally linked to. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 17:03, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Explain Article Reversal

Hello @Saintstephen000: Can't you understand simple English? You have to provide reliable sources for the information that is added, whether you add it or any other person does. Without reliable sources, there is absolutely no credibility to the article. Please read carefully about wiki guidelines in WP:REFB and WP:CHEWINGGUM. It clearly states that unsourced information is not entertained at all, and if necessary, we should remove such content. I think you haven't read those guidelines properly. If you continue to revert my edits, especially those with unsourced information, then I will inform WP:ANI and then admin will get involved regarding this issue. Thanks 2405:201:800B:6079:258E:2FDE:63A0:4E6F (talk) 18:03, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

thank you for taking the time to help us edit wikipedia.

unfortunately, uncontentious edits similar to the ones you are quickly removing are likely still relevant, and as they are not biographical, i think I'll ask you to discuss these multiple changes on the talk page.

thank again and have a wikipedia day.

Saintstephen000 (talk) Saintstephen000 (talk) 18:08, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

@Saintstephen000: Not only biographical articles but any article that is unsourced then it shall be removed immediately. Check these Template:More citations needed and Template:Alumni. These templates are made in places where unsourced content should be removed. If you can provide reliable sources, then go ahead and add sources nobody will stop you. Please also read WP:RSP to understand which sources are considered reliable. But if you revert such edits where no credible source is provided, then I will have to inform WP:ANI on this matter. Thanks--2405:201:800B:6079:258E:2FDE:63A0:4E6F (talk) 18:22, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

thanks again for helping us keep wikipedia accurate.

Saintstephen000 (talk) Saintstephen000 (talk) 04:13, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

No citation

@Saintstephen000 You are the one breaking the rules. 27.3.1.88 (talk) 04:19, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

hello fellow wikipedia editor, and thank you for taking the time to engage with us over the content you're deleting.

we are of the mind that the edits you were committing were tendentious, and being perpetrated for unknown reasons.

we don't find them to be helpful, and we wish you would find the time to quickly locate sources or tag for citation needed, rather than deleting v established, non controversial content,

we could be wrong, but we're going to tag along with you for a while and help.

thanks again for helping create a remarkable encyclopedia,

Saintstephen000 (talk) Saintstephen000 (talk) 17:50, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Please don't revert my edits

I get yku hate arabs amd want to kill all arabs now but please stop reverting my edits zipnist headahh 2A02:14F:1ED:E4CA:0:0:4700:9CD9 (talk) 19:02, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

thank you for taking the time to give me feedback on my recent edits.

I'll take a look at them again for the problems you are referencing.

thank you for helping to keep wikipedia accurate and timely.

remember, language.

Saintstephen000 (talk) Saintstephen000 (talk) 19:04, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Helping understand the revert

@Saintstephen000

Recently you seem to have reverted a new user edit vide dif 1152082128 @ the article 2023 World's Strongest Man. I could not find any mention of the reason in the edit summary.

https://www.cbc.ca/player/play/2198636611710 this and other refs seem to suggest that Mitchell Hooper is really from Barrie, Ontario.

The new editor @BarrieIsTheCity is covered by WP:Growth team, I suppose, explaining why their edit can not be retained @ their User talk:BarrieIsTheCity may be helpful in editor retention of WP project.

Thanks Bookku (talk) 05:50, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

thank you for taking the time to help me learn and grow as an editor.

I'm going to go over my revisions, this seems to be a topic of which you have some knowledge and significant interest.

i encourage you to revert or fix what you've indicated is a mistake, and I'll look over it in the morrow,

Saintstephen000 (talk) Saintstephen000 (talk) 05:54, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Your reverts

Today you made a series of reverts of completely appropriate edits. Introducing overlink violations. Restoring unsupported text without supplying RS refs. etc. Without any edit summaries on your part. Your multiple reverts were improper. Please undo them. 2603:7000:2101:AA00:714F:9C6C:35A3:BFB0 (talk) 23:04, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

i disagree with all of them.

I've read over the edits, and find them without merit.

thank you for taking the time to help keep my encyclopedia accurate,

Saintstephen000 (talk) Saintstephen000 (talk) 01:44, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

I'm happy to discuss why you feel that why. And why you left no edit summary. I explained my edits in an edit summary. You have failed to explain why you reverted them - they comply with wp policy, and your reverts fail to, and your "finding" is not wp-policy based. If we can't discuss properly, and you fail to restore the edits, let's involve an admin, who can block whichever one of us is not following wp policy. --2603:7000:2101:AA00:40C6:2E91:2ACA:FD97 (talk) 05:20, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

thank you again for taking the time to help instruct me regarding what i consider to be unconstructive edits.

thanks for helping keep Wikipedia accurate,

Saintstephen000 (talk) Saintstephen000 (talk) 20:27, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Dylan Thomas (guitarist)

Hello, Saintstephen000. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dylan Thomas".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:22, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

thank you.

although notable within a certain narrow segment of the punk goth music fanbase, i couldn't find sufficient sources to justify inclusion.

Saintstephen000 (talk) Saintstephen000 (talk) 22:19, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Saintstephen000 abusing the editing feature. Thank you. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 16:41, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

thank you for the information.

Saintstephen000 (talk) Saintstephen000 (talk) 16:42, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Anti-vandalism patrolling

I saw the AN/I section and was happy to see the resolution at Talk:International House of New York, where you had taken another look at the edits you reverted and admitted you had probably been carried away while patrolling for vandalism. It's big of you to admit that; thank you. However, while recentism is a valid concern, the concern for balance that you expressed at AN/I isn't. Although this policy section focuses on fringe positions in science and history, its underlying point is that Wikipedia presents what reliable sources state; we don't beat the bushes for a contrary opinion just to be fair. We are not subject to any "fairness doctrine", and neutrality means factually summarizing the available sources, not presenting all points of view with equal weight.

Also, while I'm happy to see you using edit summaries while reverting at that article, "no" is not much better than the default supplied by the software, "Reverted edit 12345 by User:XXXX". And your subsequent revert edit summary "these good faith edits require source" was just strange: the paragraph was cited to 2 good sources, as the other editor said, and what you actually did in that edit and others was remove the section heading?? Please give an edit summary that justifies/explains what you did in your edit.

Your reverts of 2603:7000:2101:AA00:F856:8AC1:7D50:8371, on the other hand, didn't have any edit summaries so far as I can see. After seeing the section above concerning these, "Your reverts", I had a look and I have undone your revert at Khakassian State University. The IP provided a clear edit summary justifying their edit, which removed some uncited material and two wikilinks on a country no one needs to look up, Russia. Both of these were well within the range of acceptable actions. Although editors vary—some do wikilink all countries, although it's recommended not to, and some would have either cut all the unreferenced material, or looked for a few sources instead of cutting—that was by no means a vandal edit or a test edit, which is what leaving the automatically generated edit summary means. Based on that random sample, you had no valid reason to revert and should consider reverting yourself in the other edits in that sequence. And not justifying your reverts with edit summaries and telling the IP above I've read over the edits, and find them without merit, without explanation, were both rude. Is it possible you don't feel the same need to respect unregistered editors as registered editors? If so, please be aware that you're mistaken; the civility rule applies to IP editors, too. And sometimes the unregistered editor is a newbie putting their toe in the water here for the first time; don't WP:BITE them, you were new once, too. Sometimes, on the other hand, they're a long-term editor; we have IP editors who've been helping the project for years, as well as registered editors who sometimes edit logged-out for whatever reason. Both are perfectly legal so long as they don't double-vote in a discussion.

Anyway, thank you for patrolling, but please could I ask you to be more careful in doing so? Don't revert just because you yourself wouldn't have made that edit, only if it's actively damaging, always explain why in an edit summary, and consider instead reverting only partially, or making a fix (for example to broken formatting) or a different change (such as rephrasing the new addition if you don't like the wording). That way, you and the other editor assist each other in improving the article, or at least the other editor understands what they did wrong and can avoid the same mistake next time. And take your time to make sure the problem is really a problem; for example that you didn't miss the addition of sources. It's better to get it right than to get carried away with being fast.

Thank you again for helping to protect and improve Wikipedia :-) Yngvadottir (talk) 11:21, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

that was absolutely the nicest correction possible, thank you for taking the time to instruct me on these matters.

it's factual that at times i edit quickly when the new additions page is busy, and reading over the errors i can see where this could cause mistakes and misunderstanding.

without responding point by point in this forum, be assured I'm spending my editing today reading over your guide and incorporating it into my flurrying.

have a nice day,

Saintstephen000 (talk) Saintstephen000 (talk) 18:14, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

Why dude

You reverted one of my correct changes to an inccorection. Do people not fact check shit anymore and just blindly assume? Learn to know when people die, we use past tense in those cases, not present because a dead person can't be alive, therefore it should be WAS and >not< is.

I hope you understand your blunder and don't do it again in the future. 2A02:A442:5277:1:BCD8:6391:6A6C:7D2B (talk) 13:34, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

it might have been a death announcement without source.

sometimes, editors use wiki for pranks. i was aware in real time of the passing of an important person, and was just trying to keep real.

thanks for the conversation about something with which i also care,

Saintstephen000 (talk) Saintstephen000 (talk) 18:18, 10 May 2023 (UTC)