User talk:SnoozeKing

Welcome!

Hello, SnoozeKing! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Musdan77 (talk) 04:05, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

November 2013[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Svend Robinson has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Svend Robinson was changed by SnoozeKing (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.895393 on 2013-11-09T03:10:07+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:10, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Cory Monteith does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.

The edit summary appears in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! bojo1498 talk 16:25, 14 January 2014 (UTC) bojo1498 talk 16:25, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Cory Monteith, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. bojo1498 talk 16:32, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Madonna (entertainer). There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Laser brain (talk) 03:18, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Changing the comments of other editors[edit]

Please do not modify the comments of other users on talk pages, as you did in this edit! They are the thoughts of other users and must be preserved as such. – voidxor ^{(talk | contrib)} 05:29, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016[edit]

Hi, I reverted your changes to Michael Jordan's accolades.

... five Most Valuable Player (MVP) Awards, 10 All-NBA First Team designations, nine All-Defensive First Team honors, fourteen NBA All-Star Game appearances, three All-Star Game MVP Awards, 10 scoring titles, three steals titles, six NBA Finals MVP Awards, and the 1988 NBA Defensive Player of the Year Award.

Wikipedia's of Style, Dates and numbers 'Numbers as figures or words' says, "Comparable quantities should be all spelled out or all in figures" and "Integers greater than nine expressible in one or two words may be expressed either in numerals or in words."

I also reverted your "Bachelor of Liberal Arts in cociology" change to Alexandra Stevenson rather than correct it to your intended "Bachelor of Liberal Arts in Sociology" as I couldn't find any references for that degree from University of Colorado, or for what degree Stevenson actually earned, beyond a generic "online Bachelor of Arts". I flagged it with 'citation needed'. Crētus (talk) 01:44, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism warning (June 2016)[edit]

Please desist from editing disruptively. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing privileges. Quis separabit? 01:49, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reply from SnoozeKIng: Huh? Not sure what you're talking about, Robert. My editing is always constructive and productive; it's kind of what I do for a living. Please desist from sending me nasty messages.

August 2016[edit]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to The Merchant of Venice does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! —BarrelProof (talk) 18:24, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Toronto Blue Jays, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Johnny Au _{(talk/contributions)} 20:36, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, SnoozeKing. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017[edit]

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Kurt Cobain. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. - Mlpearc (open channel) 15:49, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As I've said, suicide is a manner of death, not a cause. I'm just correcting someone's error.

I sympathize with your position, but "manner of death" is not a valid infobox parameter, so it therefore won't show up. I would suggest you go to Template talk:Infobox person and make a suggestion there to modify the template. Then perhaps you can gain consensus to change the infobox at Cobain, and other appropriate places. (By the way, you're edit warring over this, even if it isn't "3 in a row". Additionally, calling other editors "jokers" could be construed as a personal attack. Please stop.) 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 20:37, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'll second what both other editors have said. Replacing "death_cause" with "death_manner" does not help because it is not part of the infobox and does not appear to the reader. See here. The template would need rewording. If you restore that it will be edit warring and you will be blocked. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:07, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Kurt Cobain. Seattle (talk) 16:15, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I simply corrected an error; do you really want to penalize me for trying to make Wiki better? SnoozeKing (talk) 21:12, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Seattle (talk) 05:38, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nice attitude. SnoozeKing (talk) 01:06, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Talk:Carlos Santana#Dual nationality[edit]

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Carlos Santana#Dual nationality. Geraldo Perez (talk) 14:51, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017[edit]

Please use edit summaries to explain why you are making changes. You changed the text in article Bill Gates, where the text was associated with several references. Did you check those references before substituting your own words? Ideally you did. Shenme (talk) 06:07, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Shenme. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to k.d. lang have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.

Do not change people's quotes. Do not substitute different words merely at your whim. Wikipedia articles are not your playthings. Shenme (talk) 06:14, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sometimes you get it right. Sometimes you get it wrong. Sometimes you are technically correct, such as changing "eighty-third" to '83rd', but really? And a lot of the time you are just shuffling new words in to replace others.

If you must work off energy by word fiddling, try fixing misspellings. 'Comission' is good for ~70 edits, 'tthe' for another 70 edits, 'laywer' for 15 or so. Pick a word and drop or add a letter - often times that goof is in some articles. Search using ~"tthe" in the search box. Nice thing is, an article with one goof often has others, like grammar problems, and then you're fixing lots of real problems. Now a real challenge is something like ~"tahsil" for 500 edits - should be 'tehsil'. Or "promotor", which only sometimes should be 'promoter', because of valid uses of 'promotor' in Latin and other languages and/or countries. Is it right, is it wrong? Depends on the context. Shenme (talk) 06:55, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reply from SnoozeKing: LMAO

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, SnoozeKing. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries[edit]

Can you please start using edit summaries? Some of us frequently go back and review articles, to check the quality hasn't deteriorated, and it takes orders of magnitude longer to look up a change, think "does this comply with the manual of style or not" and "will anyone complain about this"? Remember that vandals don't use edit summaries either. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 10:54, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reply from SnoozeKing: You go, girl!

New Additions to the O'Farrell Theater Article[edit]

If you have a questions about any of the sourced additions and edits that I made to the Mitchell Brothers O'Farrell Theater article, please first discuss them with me on its Talk Page before you do major changes -- other editors may want to get involved as well. I have carefully checked my statements with 3 books, and feel that they are accurate and in good faith. Cheers. James Carroll (talk) 07:18, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at The Social Network, you may be blocked from editing. Given your Talk page history I'm forced to assume you know when you may be being disruptive, and it would take you all of thirty seconds (it took me ten) to verify the capitalization on website. Please stop. DonIago (talk) 19:06, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am also in agreement with User:Doniago concerning your disruptive editing, but this time upon your invalid edit today to the Mitchell Brothers O'Farrell Theater . The issue in question was resolved months ago, but you went ahead with a repetition of an earlier, invalid edit to that article. If you again repeat this action I also will have to make a disruptive editing complaint. James Carroll (talk) 23:10, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

How many times are you going to continue to falsely substitute the term 'striptease club' for 'strip club' in the Mitchell Brothers O'Farrell Theater article ? What is this, the third time, you have tried to force this incorrect term? Disruptive Editing could cause you to loose your account. James Carroll (talk) 17:09, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018[edit]

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Ann Arbor, Michigan. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. John from Idegon (talk) 00:58, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Thurston High School, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. John from Idegon (talk) 06:07, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Graham87 03:27, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SnoozeKing (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

no disruptive editing intended

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Bishonen | talk 21:15, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.