User talk:Son of Fraser and Joyce

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello, Son of Fraser and Joyce! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Dlohcierekim 14:23, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines
The community
Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Postpartum psychosis[edit]

Hi,

You revisions look to be going well so far. Lots of good information. However please be mindful of proper styles of formatting on Wikipedia. For example, section heads are bracketed by a number of "=" to indicate their indentation. I have done this for you in the Postpartum psychosis. See The Wikipedia Manual of Style for more details, or look at other well-established articles for guidance.Legitimus (talk) 20:07, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Organic prepartum and postpartum psychoses[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Organic prepartum and postpartum psychoses, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.springerlink.com/content/g05524685542t74h/. As a copyright violation, Organic prepartum and postpartum psychoses appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Organic prepartum and postpartum psychoses has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Melchoir (talk) 06:05, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Mother infant relationship disorders[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Mother infant relationship disorders, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from www.scribd.com/doc/18500054/Perinatal-and-Postpartum-Mood-Disorders, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Mother infant relationship disorders saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Rich Farmbrough, 16:37, 13 October 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Copyright block[edit]

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from other sources without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted.

Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you believe this block is unjustified or if you are able to provide a credible assertion that you understand and intend to comply with these policies, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Moonriddengirl (talk) 00:15, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The article above clearly copies content verbatim from Perinatal and postpartum mood disorders: perspectives and treatment guide. I'm afraid that we cannot risk permitting copyright problems on Wikipedia. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 00:17, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Son of Fraser and Joyce (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #16487 was submitted on Sep 08, 2016 16:27:04. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 16:27, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Son of Fraser and Joyce (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that I cannot duplicate even my own text that was published elsewhere, and will be careful not to do this again. Please accept my apologies for the confusion, and the long delay in my response!

Decline reason:

If you are this user, remember to log in before posting, so your posts are properly attributed to you. 331dot (talk) 10:20, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

2A00:23C5:EC0A:5800:1192:7E46:32B:FAF (talk) 06:53, 10 February 2020 (UTC)Son of Fraser and Joyce[reply]

Unblock request[edit]

Thank you for unblocking me. I shall be careful not to infringe copyright again. Son of Fraser and Joyce (talk) 06:58, 11 February 2020 (UTC)Son of Fraser and Joyce[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Organic Psychoses of Childbearing has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Organic Psychoses of Childbearing. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 12:00, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am grateful to Robert McClenon for suggestions on the improvement of this submission. He commented:

[1] That the article reads like a subsection from a textbook, rather than a summary of what has been written by reliable sources.

The problem is that there are no other reliable sources. Very few books have been written on postpartum psychoses, and only one on the organic causes – my monograph published in 2006 (reference 4). Alwyn Lishman is an authority on organic psychiatry, but does not deal with this topic; in fact he wrote a forward to this monograph. My book ‘rescues’ knowledge contained in about 1,000 articles, theses and books written in the last 250 years. The book is a compendium of what has been written by a multitude of sources (of varying reliability). The book is not really a textbook – it would never be recommended to students of any discipline to ‘mug up’ for an examination; it is a source of information for scholars, scientists and clinicians. The submission is a summary for the Wikipedia community, which I hope will guide them to deeper knowledge in areas of interest to them.

[2] That the submission has no lead section. Partly this is my mistake in entitling the first paragraph ‘Introduction’, rather than leaving it untitled. My ‘introduction’ was intended to be a lead section. I have studied Wikipedia’s guidelines on lead sections, and see that this opening paragraph needs to be improved, identifying the topic, putting it in context, and stating why it is important, before summarizing the most important points. That is the main change in this re-submission.

[3] Thirdly, it has no links. I have supplied 23 links.

I am sorry that the instruction       does not seem to work. I have still not found a solution to indenting my case examples, which will improve the readability of this entry.

Many thanks for considering this re-submission.

````Son of Fraser and Joyce````, February 24th 2020 i.f.brockington@bham.ac.uk

Your submission at Articles for creation: Organic Psychoses of Childbearing (February 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Seems to contain original resaerch too
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 10:07, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Son of Fraser and Joyce! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 10:07, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:
This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 14:37, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:Son of Fraser and Joyce/sandbox has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Son of Fraser and Joyce/sandbox. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 14:39, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Menstrual psychosis and Psychiatric_disorders_of_childbirth[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Mvolz. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.

Additionally, could you please look into how to cite sources correctly on Wikipedia. See Wikipedia:Tutorial/Citing_sources Mvolz (talk) 11:43, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Psychiatric disorders of childbirth shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. RexxS (talk) 16:47, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear RexxS. Many thanks for the warning. Son of Fraser and Joyce (talk) 06:51, 4 March 2020 (UTC)Son of Fraser and JoyceSon of Fraser and Joyce (talk) 06:51, 4 March 2020 (UTC), March 4th 2020.[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia and Wikiproject Medicine

Welcome to Wikipedia! We have compiled some guidance for new healthcare editors:

  1. Please keep the mission of Wikipedia in mind. We provide the public with accepted knowledge, working in a community.
  2. We do that by finding high quality secondary sources and summarizing what they say, giving WP:WEIGHT as they do. Please do not try to build content by synthesizing content based on primary sources.
  3. Please use high-quality, recent, secondary sources for medical content (see WP:MEDRS; for the difference between primary and secondary sources, see the WP:MEDDEF section.) High-quality sources include review articles (which are not the same as peer-reviewed), position statements from nationally and internationally recognized bodies (like CDC, WHO, FDA), and major medical textbooks. Lower-quality sources are typically removed. Please beware of predatory publishers – check the publishers of articles (especially open source articles) at Beall's list.
  4. The ordering of sections typically follows the instructions at WP:MEDMOS. The section above the table of contents is called the WP:LEAD. It summarizes the body. Do not add anything to the lead that is not in the body. Style is covered in MEDMOS as well; we avoid the word "patient" for example.
  5. We don't use terms like "currently", "recently," "now", or "today". See WP:RELTIME.
  6. More generally see WP:MEDHOW, which gives great tips for editing about health -- for example, it provides a way to format citations quickly and easily
  7. Citation details are important:
    • Be sure to cite the PMID for journal articles and ISBN for books
    • Please include page numbers when referencing a book or long journal article, and please format citations consistently within an article.
    • Do not use URLs from your university library that have "proxy" in them: the rest of the world cannot see them.
    • Reference tags generally go after punctuation, not before; there is no preceding space.
  8. We use very few capital letters (see WP:MOSCAPS) and very little bolding. Only the first word of a heading is usually capitalized.
  9. Common terms are not usually wikilinked; nor are years, dates, or names of countries and major cities. Avoid overlinking!
  10. Never copy and paste from sources; we run detection software on new edits.
  11. Talk to us! Wikipedia works by collaboration at articles and user talkpages.

Once again, welcome, and thank you for joining us! Please share these guidelines with other new editors.

– the WikiProject Medicine teamDoc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:15, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Doc James, Many thanks for this advice on the encyclopaedic style. Son of Fraser and Joyce (talk) 06:51, 4 March 2020 (UTC)Son of Fraser and JoyceSon of Fraser and Joyce (talk) 06:51, 4 March 2020 (UTC), March 4th 2020.[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 31[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Psychiatric disorders of childbirth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Depression (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:41, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 14[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Psychiatric disorders of childbirth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Syncope (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:56, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Sulfurboy[edit]

Thanks for leaving a message there. However, to sign your posts, four tildes are enough. There is no need to add anything else after the 4 tildes. Just use tildes, not 8, and there is no need to type your username. The 4 tildes does it yourself.

Like this: ~~~~ gives Son of Fraser and Joyce (talk) 06:43, 26 May 2020 (UTC), which is enough. Thank you, and keep that in mind![reply]

-- Eumat114 formerly TLOM (Message) 06:43, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's very helpful. Thank you, Eurmat114. Son of Fraser and Joyce (talk) 17:30, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mother-Infant Bonding Disorders (June 26)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MapleSoy was:
This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Thanks for submitting this article. Based on a literature search, there is likely enough coverage of this topic (including the submitter's own scholarly works) to merit its own article. However, in its current state, this article does not meet Wikipedia's standards for inclusion as it contains a considerable amount of original research and un-cited clinical perspective.

I would suggest that the next draft should refer only to what is contained in peer-reviewed articles about "maternal-infant bonding disorders," which is a specific term, rather than generalizing to include material about other postpartum concerns (where the authors of those articles do not make mention of "maternal-infant bonding disorders").

Please let me know if you have any questions. I'd be happy to discuss this with you further!
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
MapleSoy (talk) 02:20, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:45, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Organic Psychoses of Childbearing[edit]

Hello, Son of Fraser and Joyce. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Organic Psychoses of Childbearing".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 03:34, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mother-Infant Bonding Disorders[edit]

Information icon Hello, Son of Fraser and Joyce. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mother-Infant Bonding Disorders, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:01, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Son_of_Fraser_and_Joyce&oldid=1078910008"