User talk:LachlanTansey45566788765444332

Welcome

Hello, LachlanTansey45566788765444332, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 12:19, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Getting started

• Introduction
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Intuitive guide to Wikipedia

Finding your way around

• Table of contents
• Directories and indexes
• Department directory

Editing articles

• How to develop an article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help

• Frequently asked questions
• Cheatsheet
• Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
• The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
• Help pages
• Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

• Community Portal
• Join a WikiProject
• Follow Wikipedia etiquette
• Practice civility
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Your submission at Articles for creation: Meckering (October 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Meckering and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 12:19, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Hello, LachlanTansey45566788765444332! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 12:19, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, LachlanTansey45566788765444332. Thank you for creating Leighton railway station. User:Hughesdarren, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

None of the sources (other than the wikipedia one} seem to work.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hughesdarren (talk) 09:35, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

All ready exists

Please do not create dupicate items about places that already exist - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meckering,_Western_Australia

Thanks. JarrahTree 11:24, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Leighton railway station moved to draftspace: current sourcing is dubious.

An article you recently created, Leighton railway station, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Modussiccandi (talk) 11:38, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leighton railway station (October 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gorden 2211 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Leighton railway station and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gorden 2211 (talk) 23:35, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Difficult to tell

If you would like help, or not, and how seriously you understand the setbacks with the Meckering and Leighton ideas, it is indeed hard to tell...

Meckering - information about the rail service is already incorporated in the existing article about meckering - and the post 1966 location is very far from being a notable location in the recent notability pronouncements. If you were writing about 1897 - 1940 meckering railway station that is a totally different matter.

Leighton - wikipedia articles are not reliable sources. Leighton station really, as far as the amount of history that could be gleaned from some sources - could be either a sub-part of the north fremantle article - or, if you were particularly adept at the tangents required - could combine material about leighton marshalling yard: - however the trick there is the material about the marshalling yard - due to operational dates - 1950s to 1980s - is where the black hole exists in a source such as trove due to copyright issues... As it goes your efforts to date are hard to identify as to whether they are concerted attempts at providing new material from good WP:RS. As a result it is hard to know which way to go with adding information or not. JarrahTree 08:14, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

FYI

Just to let you know that a significant amount of your edit history will be reverted...

On your user page - you claim that your sources for edits and changes are

http://dictionary.sensagent.com/List%20of%20Perth%20railway%20stopping%20patterns/en-en/ https://wikimili.com/en/List_of_Perth_railway_stopping_patterns Please note that wikipedia does not allow editing that sources from mirror sites

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Mirrors_and_forks/STU#sensagent.com

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Mirrors_and_forks/VWXYZ#Wikimili Which means you maybe need to understand the mirror issue - you are utilising information from a deleted article that still exists in a mirror site - which means your edits are neither valid or correct...

Please get a very good handle of what WP:NOT and WP:ABOUT are actually about.

Also, railway information boxes are for current, not historical operations, as the boxes have limited scope, and possible historical variations are potentially problematic. Please note that continued reference to or gaining content from mirror sites of deleted articles are simply red rags to admins who might feel that you do not want to abide by what the rules are here... Take care!!

JarrahTree 09:21, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

can i just change my sources LachlanTansey45566788765444332 (talk) 09:23, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

The sources aren't the only issue. Adding heaps of defunct stopping patterns makes the infobox excessively long. See City West railway station for an example. Another issue is that considering the Fremantle/Midland line is 141 years old, it is impossible to make a complete list of stopping patterns that have existed over that period, and even if it were, that would make the infobox even longer. I think it is best to list stopping patterns that are currently in use. Steelkamp (talk) 10:35, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

you make a good point if i ever include stopping patterns it would be current ones

thanks for the advice :D LachlanTansey45566788765444332 (talk) 20:31, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

thanks for understanding the issue and reverting your own edits - also remember dont utilise/believe mirror sites for starters... JarrahTree 01:09, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leighton railway station has been accepted

Leighton railway station, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:33, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

Please

Do not put Perth Australia - there is no such thing, as there is another Perth in Australia. Please also clarify claims you make in editing - to WP:RS - also after having utilising mirror site(s) as a claimed source, you will have to work that little harder to clarify source of information. Take care. JarrahTree 09:14, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Please

Make some sort of acknowledgement that you understand messages on your talk page, and other pages - the less you respond, the more likely you will find your editing is under scrutiny of the annoying kind.

When creating new pages - like west perth - the lack of a category, and the lack of reliable sources to verify/back the idea of the article, is what watching editors find as a suggestion that you either are not reading messages, or understanding WP:ABOUT and WP:NOT.

No active talk engagement, and expect to have a very difficult time.

If you are going to keep adding older versions of newer stations - the PTA website is not a WP:RS in that circumstance. The lack of other sources will go against your article creation. Take care. JarrahTree 11:26, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of West Perth Railway Station

The article West Perth Railway Station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The City west station is the subsequent station, and is adequately described and accommodated in that article - there is no need for the extra article as there was nothing sufficiently notable about west perth that cannot be dealt with in the city west article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JarrahTree 11:30, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

i will accept the deletion of my page and i apologize for any inconvenience i have caused moderators LachlanTansey45566788765444332 (talk) 15:09, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Bellevue Railway Station for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bellevue Railway Station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bellevue Railway Station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Trainsandotherthings (talk) 15:31, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Bellevue Railway Station

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Bellevue Railway Station. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Bellevue railway station, Perth. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Bellevue railway station, Perth. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 16:53, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

W pattern

Are you aware that the "W" pattern services on the Fremantle line timetable are actually Airport line services? Steelkamp (talk) 16:53, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Also, there has never been a station called "Subiaco Oval Station" and that draft will not result in an article. You might be thinking of the third platform at West Leederville railway station which had Mandurah line services during events at Subiaco Oval. Steelkamp (talk) 17:20, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Per Steelkamp's comments here, and the deletion today of Bellevue Railway Station, you really need to ensure you are doing due diligence and the articles you create do not duplicate existing articles and are actually real stations. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 19:19, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Calder Park railway station

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Calder Park railway station, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Steelkamp (talk) 11:09, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Mundijong railway station

The sole source within this article is just a timetable. Merely proving the station exists does not mean it should have an article. You should include other sources. For example, this page from the Heritage Council of WA. Steelkamp (talk) 11:14, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mundijong railway station

The article Mundijong railway station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No need for a separate article - Mundijong as a locality already exists - editor has been repeatedly uploading material for non notable railway stations that could be included in the articles about the localities

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JarrahTree 11:56, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

PLEASE STOP

Your continued creation of totally inadequate stubs about railway stations has now got to the point where sanctions are required. The time and effort of others to 'cleanup' after you is now beyond tolerable as expected of new editors.

You appear to not have learnt from the experience of being checked by other users - there seems no reason to expect that you have any sense of what wikipedia is about.

The experience of being blocked may well be a way of seeing why your editing to date is disruptive and of little use to the improvement of the encyclopedia.

There are now sufficient differences between edits and corrections for a reviewing administrator to reasonably consider blocking from the evidence to date.

For starters - fellow editors are not moderators

For a possible resolution to the issue you might:

To volunteer on your part not start or create new articles outside of the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_creation process

And that the articles are to be reviewed for WP:Notability within the

Trains context

Western Australian context

To volunteer draft changes only to anything to do with information boxes about

railway stopping places. (ie other editors review) As this is not part of the established remedies as outlined in the processes available in the formal part of what wikipedia has available - it is being offered as an informal remedy to obviate the rather uncomfortable experience of being blocked as a disruptive editor. You are free to ignore this (as you appear to have done so with most of the messages above), however it is offering something that might prevent you being blocked. I am sure other editors might different views on how to resolve your stub constructions - this is being offered in good faith in the hope that you either change your editing style - or at least understand if others are indeed more exacting and precise in their consideration of your disruptions - you have had your problem adequately explained to you. JarrahTree 12:25, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Ok im very sorry im just trying to help but clearly my efforts are in vane LachlanTansey45566788765444332 (talk) 21:35, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Mundijong railway station for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mundijong railway station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mundijong railway station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JarrahTree 08:23, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

AFD withdrawn - I think that you should go out of your way to thank Steelkamp for his rescue of the article. It was, perhaps the only stopping place on the south west railway without an article that deserved it. The word vane suggests that english is not your first language? - the word you should have used is vain - and no, your efforts are not in vain, when you show signs of learning from your mistakes, and offer up your ideas via new page review... JarrahTree 10:09, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Hello fellow Perth rail editors

I would like to add a paragraph on the Perth Station page about "changed during the 21st Century" but I wanted to ask before doing so as when I have done this in the past I did not ask and did the edit terribly but I have learnt from my mistakes and am asking before editing LachlanTansey45566788765444332 (talk) 03:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

What specifically do you want to add? There are already three paragraphs on the 21st century on that article, albeit not in their own sections. They could do with some expansion. Just make sure to use reliable sources for anything you add. Steelkamp (talk) 07:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

alright thanks mate! LachlanTansey45566788765444332 (talk) 08:16, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

==

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LachlanTansey45566788765444332 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was just using a VPN

Decline reason:

You're not blocked for using a VPN, you're blocked for being User:LachlanTansey. GeneralNotability (talk) 02:22, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

==

the reason i use a vpn is because at school wikipedia is blocked but we are still allowed to use it. Using a VPN usually makes wikipedia available. On that i never vandalized and was genuinely trying to be helpful LachlanTansey45566788765444332 (talk) 02:16, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

2nd appeal

after reading the appeal page i do admit to creating a new account after have being blocked on an old one this was due to me not reading baduc rules and having common sense since i was around 10 years old. Even if im blocked again i will not change accounts again and thats a promise. The reason i read and edit on Wikipedia is because i mainly interest in Australian railways specifically in Perth. LachlanTansey45566788765444332 (talk) 02:38, 3 December 2022 (UTC)