User talk:Carptrash: Difference between revisions
→The Bugle: Issue CLXXXI, May 2021: new section Tag: |
Suomichris (talk | contribs) →Help at Neoshamanism?: new section |
||
| Line 412: | Line 412: | ||
</div> |
</div> |
||
<!-- Message sent by User:Ian Rose@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:The_ed17/sandbox3&oldid=1024093191 --> |
<!-- Message sent by User:Ian Rose@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:The_ed17/sandbox3&oldid=1024093191 --> |
||
== Help at [[Neoshamanism]]? == |
|||
Hello! I see you've previously been involved at discussion about the [[neoshamanism]] article. I've recently been attempting to improve it, removing bias and including more sources, but have been encountering a lot of friction. If you have time, could you come by and either weigh in on Talk or take a look at the recent edits and see if you see anything problematic that should be discussed? Thanks! [[User:Suomichris|Suomichris]] ([[User talk:Suomichris|talk]]) 23:48, 23 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 23:48, 23 May 2021
User talk:Carptrash/Archive 10
User talk:Carptrash/Archive 11
19:11, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
User talk:Carptrash/Archive 12
Happy Holidays
 |
Season's greetings! |
| I hope this holiday season is festive and fulfilling and filled with love and kindness, and that 2021 will be safe, successful and rewarding...keep hope alive....Modernist (talk) 13:32, 25 December 2020 (UTC) |
Happy New Year!
 Walter Elmer Schofield, Across the River (1904), Carnegie Museum of Art. |
Best wishes for a safe, healthy and prosperous 2021. | |
| Thank you for your contributions toward making Wikipedia a better and more accurate place. BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 15:58, 26 December 2020 (UTC) Oneupsmanship: This painting turned the friendly rivalry between Edward Redfield and Elmer Schofield into a feud. Schofield was a frequent houseguest at Redfield's farm, upstream from New Hope, Pennsylvania, and the two would go out painting together, competing to capture the better view. Redfield served on the jury for the 1904 Annual Exhibition of the Carnegie Institute; at which, despite Redfield's opposition, Across the River was awarded the Gold Medal and $1,500 prize. It was not until a 1963 interview that the 93-year-old Redfield revealed the painting as the cause of the 40-year feud between them. Schofield may have painted it in England, but a blindsided Redfield knew that this was a view of the Delaware River, from his own front yard! |
Voting for "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" closing
G'day all, voting for the WikiProject Military history "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" is about to close, so if you haven't already, click on the links and have your say before 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:34, 28 December 2020 (UTC) for the coord team
A New Year With Women in Red!
 
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:01, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Happy New Year!
|
A wish for the new year |
| A quote from Gargantua and Pantagruel by Rabelais; it is taken from the manuscript of Jules Massenet's opera Panurge, in the composer's own hand. It is my greeting of choice for the new year, because it encourages us to live joyfully, and try not to take life too seriously...while quaffing whatever beverage we choose, naturally. This has been a challenging year, to say the least; I hope that 2021 may bring a fresh start, and better days ahead. May the new year bring you joy and peace...and many days of fruitful editing. |
--Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 22:55, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXVII, January 2021
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:06, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
Books & Bytes - Issue 42
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 42, November – December 2020
- New EBSCO collections now available
- 1Lib1Ref 2021 underway
- Library Card input requested
- Libraries love Wikimedia, too!
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:00, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
February 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 14:58, 27 January 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The Bugle: Issue CLXXVIII, February 2021
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:58, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXVIII, February 2021
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:02, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
March 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:47, 26 February 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Precious anniversary
 | |
| Six years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:35, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Thanks, @Gerda Arendt: - time flies when I am having fun. Carptrash (talk) 15:50, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 42
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 42, January – February 2021
- New partnerships: PNAS, De Gruyter, Nomos
- 1Lib1Ref
- Library Card
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:27, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXIX, March 2021
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:56, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
April editathons from Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:15, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive
Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:23, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello Carptrash since you created this article, I came across this image and I was wondering if it would be suitable to add. Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 16:19, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Lotje:, yes that would be great, especially if you pulled just the picture of him and put it in an info box. Do it! Carptrash (talk) 16:39, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
- Don't have a clew on how to do that. Sorry I can't help you there right now. I'm off now, maybe tomorrow I'll find a way to solve that problem.
Happy Easter ! Lotje (talk) 16:41, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
- I just got the picture part done (I think) but have never done an info box. Perhaps I will just post the picture. Thanks, Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 16:48, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Lotje:, Okay, got the picture in, thanks for sending it this way. Let me know if/when you find more. Carptrash (talk) 17:04, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
- I just got the picture part done (I think) but have never done an info box. Perhaps I will just post the picture. Thanks, Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 16:48, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
- Don't have a clew on how to do that. Sorry I can't help you there right now. I'm off now, maybe tomorrow I'll find a way to solve that problem.
The Bugle: Issue CLXXX, April 2021
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 02:08, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 23
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of law enforcement officers killed in the line of duty in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:51, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
- Will fix it right now. Carptrash (talk) 15:54, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
May 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 21:35, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Da Doo Ron Ron covers
Wikipedia's policy regarding song covers states: "Only cover versions/renditions important enough to have gained attention in their own right should be added to song articles." None of the listed covers of "Da Doo Ron Ron" fit this criterion. Furthermore, none of the examples of the song used or parodied in media are demonstrably notable enough to be included. Thus, the article should not feature this lengthy list of obscure covers and references. Songwaters (talk) 20:31, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
- Many of these have gained my attention. I am not too concerned about the policy, how significant a song is can be measured in part by who covers it. All these covers are by notable artists, there is not the version by Los Pathetics for example. Please don't insist on making a big deal about this. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 20:37, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
Teahouse
Please try your best to be both accurate and friendly when you comment at the Teahouse. Thanks. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 05:25, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Cullen328:What did you find to be inaccurate? Carptrash (talk) 05:30, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
- You wrote
:I suggest that the next thing you do is create and sign in with a wikipedia account. It makes it seem that you not only care about your grandfather but also about wikipedia.
Please be aware that unregistered users have every right to edit Wikipedia. Editing from a registered account is not required. You went on to imply that this editor cares only about their grandfather. They may also wish to improve Wikipedia more broadly, and only need some advice and guidance. Give it a try. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 05:44, 7 May 2021 (UTC)- I believe that a new editor has a better chance of being successful here if they register, and further, if they become a blue link. I have helped many new editors over my time here. I was presenting my opinion. Carptrash (talk) 14:56, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
- It came across as unnecessarily terse. David notMD (talk) 19:21, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
- I believe that a new editor has a better chance of being successful here if they register, and further, if they become a blue link. I have helped many new editors over my time here. I was presenting my opinion. Carptrash (talk) 14:56, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
- You wrote
Books & Bytes – Issue 43
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 43, March – April 2021
- New Library Card designs
- 1Lib1Ref May
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:11, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXXI, May 2021
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:57, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
Help at Neoshamanism?
Hello! I see you've previously been involved at discussion about the neoshamanism article. I've recently been attempting to improve it, removing bias and including more sources, but have been encountering a lot of friction. If you have time, could you come by and either weigh in on Talk or take a look at the recent edits and see if you see anything problematic that should be discussed? Thanks! Suomichris (talk) 23:48, 23 May 2021 (UTC)