Jump to content

Talk:Deaths in 2022: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
top: No. 17/25
Line 48: Line 48:
::::[[User:WWGB|WWGB]]: By consensus, or fail. It's that simple. [[User:Refsworldlee|'''Ref''']] <sup>[[User talk:Refsworldlee|(chew)]]</sup>[[Special:Contributions/Refsworldlee|<small>(do)</small>]] 11:46, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
::::[[User:WWGB|WWGB]]: By consensus, or fail. It's that simple. [[User:Refsworldlee|'''Ref''']] <sup>[[User talk:Refsworldlee|(chew)]]</sup>[[Special:Contributions/Refsworldlee|<small>(do)</small>]] 11:46, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
:::::That WIR wikiproject link is interesting. There are NO bluelinked recent deaths (out of 78) only red links. [[User:Editrite!|Editrite!]] ([[User talk:Editrite!|talk]]) 21:14, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
:::::That WIR wikiproject link is interesting. There are NO bluelinked recent deaths (out of 78) only red links. [[User:Editrite!|Editrite!]] ([[User talk:Editrite!|talk]]) 21:14, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

== MacDermott Misattribution ==

Sir John MacDermott is currently mistakenly linked as having served on the [[Court of Appeal in Ireland]] which was abolished before he was born.
He served on the [[Courts of Northern Ireland#Court of Appeal]].
(Meanwhile British peers and their consorts customarily treat their titles as if they were surnames (and are so indexed in reference works) so why are recent such decedents being alphabetized under surnames they do NOT use?)
[[Special:Contributions/71.105.190.154|71.105.190.154]] ([[User talk:71.105.190.154|talk]]) 08:59, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:59, 18 December 2022

Horseys

List Doesn't need horseys. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.174.130.69 (talk) 19:16, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Go back and read the guidelines carefully. Any animal that already has its own English Wikipedia article can be listed here. Ref (chew)(do) 20:46, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Jeez again? Horses are living beings. If a human, horse, dog, tree, etc die, they get listed here. Though I think with redlinked animals/trees they can't be. Rusted AutoParts 20:51, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No redirects! Ref (chew)(do) 04:00, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Rusted AutoParts: horseys*. Wyliepedia @ 15:25, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that this page should be for humans only. A recent entry is for a euthanized panda... this is just excessive and without merit or interest. If these deaths must be listed - then I proposed that beginning in 2023 - this page be a list for humans and a separate list for "others" should be established. 2603:8080:2502:7B00:4C75:7442:9187:388 (talk) 23:00, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
2603:8080:2502:7B00:4C75:7442:9187:388 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. WWGB (talk) 01:36, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey c’mon can we make a separate list for non-human animals already? It’s just jarring having Holocaust survivors and former prime ministers next to horses and f*****g panda bears Carbonara4 (talk) 01:22, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I guess it depends on your world view. I think that horses and pandas bring more joy to the world that terrorists and convicted murderers, also reported on this page. WWGB (talk) 01:51, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Opinion: Should stay as is. Ref (chew)(do) 09:37, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So few women in Recent Deaths

How is it that the Recent Deaths section has no women listed, or at most 25%? Stasikat (talk) 12:29, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not even replying to that inane comment. Ref (chew)(do) 15:40, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
By the way, we aren't Recent Deaths, we're Deaths in 2022. Ref (chew)(do) 15:40, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Recent deaths is a link on the Main Page, and redirects to this article. WWGB (talk) 01:09, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
By the way x2, RDs on the main page go through a harsher scrutiny to get added there than here. Example: if just one "citation needed" tag is on a biography, it's declined. Wyliepedia @ 01:36, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Coming back to the question, we publish the deaths of notable people, as reported in reliable sources. There are many influences like sexism and the glass ceiling which lead to fewer female deaths being reported in reliable media. WWGB (talk) 11:30, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
There are an innumerable amount of notable women not listed at Wikipedia, so much so that there are indices for them or their work. To further help their plight, feel free to join the WIR wikiproject. There will also be drive to improve 2022 death notices starting in December. Wyliepedia @ 00:00, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
How will that work? WWGB (talk) 04:03, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
WWGB: By consensus, or fail. It's that simple. Ref (chew)(do) 11:46, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That WIR wikiproject link is interesting. There are NO bluelinked recent deaths (out of 78) only red links. Editrite! (talk) 21:14, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MacDermott Misattribution

Sir John MacDermott is currently mistakenly linked as having served on the Court of Appeal in Ireland which was abolished before he was born. He served on the Courts of Northern Ireland#Court of Appeal. (Meanwhile British peers and their consorts customarily treat their titles as if they were surnames (and are so indexed in reference works) so why are recent such decedents being alphabetized under surnames they do NOT use?) 71.105.190.154 (talk) 08:59, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]