Talk:Amy Schumer: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:30, 2 December 2023

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Amy Schumer article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1: 365 days

Template:Vital article

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 23, 2007	Articles for deletion	No consensus
March 17, 2010	Articles for deletion	No consensus

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers B‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Mid-importance).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Comedy B‑class Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Feminism B‑class Low‑importance

	Feminism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Judaism B‑class Low‑importance

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

New York (state) B‑class Low‑importance

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

New York City B‑class Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Women B‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Women writers B‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:

July 19 to 25, 2015 (12th)

Archives

Index 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by when more than 8 sections are present.

Outdated picture

Maybe it's time to update her main picture? It's 11 years old and does nothing to represent the body positive, vivacious style of Amy in 2022. 216.49.37.233 (talk) 15:01, 12 February 2022 (UTC)GreenGo[reply]

Doesn't matter. UfoTheUfo (talk) 11:25, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Amy Schumer Oscar Untold Joke

Is it appropriate for Amy's extremely unfunny joke that she was told not to say at the Oscars to have a place on this page?

Here are some sources:

https://jezebel.com/amy-schumers-untold-oscars-joke-shouldve-stayed-that-wa-1848758255

https://themarysue.com/amy-schumer-and-her-trash-joke

https://newsweek.com/amy-schumer-alec-baldwin-oscars-joke-backlash-will-smith-1695008

Adios, ypc0cnz (talk) 14:11, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it is terribly significant, biographically speaking, to cover something that she didn't even do. I doubt that she'll be remembered for this never delivered joke in even 2 years time. --OuroborosCobra (talk) 15:45, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt it'll be WP:LASTING in two weeks. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:17, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 23 April 2022

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

curly 73.133.246.167 (talk) 16:50, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:02, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 6 May 2022

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

some of the paragraphs are misleading and not enough trustful Notanyoneisasavior (talk) 20:46, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Please submit your request for any changes in the form "please change X to Y". Innisfree987 (talk) 20:48, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

joke theft

It looks to me that the joke theft section has been completely removed? it's enough that media outlets have complied lists of thefts.

https://www.vox.com/2016/1/27/10839856/amy-schumer-joke-stealing

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/arts-and-entertainment/wp/2016/01/21/amy-schumer-denies-stealing-jokes-that-would-be-so-stupid-for-me-to-do-that/ https://www.buzzfeed.com/elliewoodward/people-think-amy-schumer-stole-jokes

is there a reason i'm not seeing for this omission? Naihreloe (talk) 17:02, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's not "completely removed". See Amy Schumer#In the media: In January 2016, Schumer was accused of stealing jokes from comedians Tammy Pescatelli, Kathleen Madigan, Wendy Liebman, and Patrice O'Neal. Schumer denied the allegations. Other comedians, such as Marc Maron and Dave Rubin, defended Schumer. Pescatelli later apologized, stating it had "gone too far" and was probably "parallel thinking". – Muboshgu (talk) 17:27, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Amy's support for Israel and the very problematic posts she has shared need be urgently added to her page. What is the delay with this? Having a locked page goes against the very ethos of Wikipedia and to be honest, in a new era of very organised boycotts, Wikipedia will become irrelevant if it looks like you are promoting censorship in this way. Speaking of censorship, it should also be added to Schumer's page that herself, Sacha Baron Cohen and Debra Messing privately lobbied TikTok to suppress content critical of Israel this past week. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amelia7117 (talk • contribs) 21:14, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What do you propose adding? Note that we need reliable sources for any addition, especially something like this. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:20, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

why is her page locked? If it wasn't locked I can update it. Why are some pages protected and not others? and if they are locked, why aren't they being updated at least by moderators? Amelia7117 (talk) 21:20, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The talk page is not locked; you are able to request changes here. However, they must comply with WP:BLP and be backed up with reliable sources. —C.Fred (talk) 21:22, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Amelia7117: Please say specifically what sentence(s) you want added and what reliable source can be cited to verify the claim. Innisfree987 (talk) 21:24, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear language

"In January 2016, Schumer was accused of stealing jokes from comedians Tammy Pescatelli, Kathleen Madigan, Wendy Liebman, and Patrice O'Neal. Schumer denied the allegations. Other comedians, such as Marc Maron and Dave Rubin, defended Schumer. Pescatelli later apologized, stating it had "gone too far" and was probably "parallel thinking". In 2017, a video showcasing all cases of alleged joke thefts were collated in a 26-minute compilation on YouTube by The Tangerine Show, garnering more than 8.8 million views as of May 2023."

It's not clear that Pescatelli was an accuser until it's mentioned that he apologized here. Could someone push a change to this effect? 216.164.249.213 (talk) 05:32, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy section

I get people don't want this page vandalized due to comments Amy has made on social media, but at the very least is owed a controversy section. Amy herself has posted a racist cartoon calling all Gazans rapist, has misquoted MLK, etc. Adding a controversy section is how a very similar issue was handled on Spyglass Media Group. 2600:8806:3105:E500:B430:723B:3E88:1EBE (talk) 14:21, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We ~~don't~~ shouldn't create WP:CONTROVERSYSECTIONs. We can add something in other places based on what WP:RS say, but you have to bring us some. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:17, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Y'all definitely create controversy sections on articles in situations like this. I've seen it a million times before on Wikipedia. Here's a page that has one for example: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spyglass_Media_Group 72.196.233.42 (talk) 09:19, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Address removing that controversy section on Talk:Spyglass Media Group, not here. I've modified my original comment. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:39, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I just looked at that page and saw a comment about one actress getting fired and no evidence of "controversy", so I deleted it entirely. Controversy sections are bad for Wikipedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:41, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2

Sorry for the double post, just got done skimming the article and there is no mention of the fact that shes widely considered one of the worst and least funny comedians of all-time? Obviously this has been added and cited before as its the most commonly associated fact with amy schumer so why is it not here? 216.164.249.213 (talk) 16:16, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 103: / Line 103: @@
 :::Address removing that controversy section on [[Talk:Spyglass Media Group]], not here. I've modified my original comment. &ndash;&nbsp;[[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 17:39, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
 :::Actually I just looked at that page and saw a comment about one actress getting fired and no evidence of "controversy", so I deleted it entirely. Controversy sections are bad for Wikipedia. &ndash;&nbsp;[[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 17:41, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
+== 2 ==
+Sorry for the double post, just got done skimming the article and there is no mention of the fact that shes widely considered one of the worst and least funny comedians of all-time? Obviously this has been added and cited before as its the most commonly associated fact with amy schumer so why is it not here? [[Special:Contributions/216.164.249.213|216.164.249.213]] ([[User talk:216.164.249.213|talk]]) 16:16, 2 December 2023 (UTC)