User talk:Sudsahab: Difference between revisions
→April 2024: Reply |
typo |
||
Line 436: | Line 436: | ||
:I assure you that I am committed to rectifying my mistakes and making amends for the damage I have caused. I pledge to adhere strictly to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines moving forward and to contribute constructively and transparently to the community. I have contributed to Wikipedia by creating many Wikipedia pages that are notable and participated in fruitful discussion to build a consensus so please give me a last chance to repent and change myself. I apologize once again for my misconduct and assure you that I am fully committed to earning back the trust and respect of the Wikipedia community through my future conduct.[[User:Sudsahab|Sudsahab]] ([[User talk:Sudsahab#top|talk]]) 17:46, 28 April 2024 (UTC)}} [[User:Sudsahab|Sudsahab]] ([[User talk:Sudsahab#top|talk]]) 17:46, 28 April 2024 (UTC) |
:I assure you that I am committed to rectifying my mistakes and making amends for the damage I have caused. I pledge to adhere strictly to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines moving forward and to contribute constructively and transparently to the community. I have contributed to Wikipedia by creating many Wikipedia pages that are notable and participated in fruitful discussion to build a consensus so please give me a last chance to repent and change myself. I apologize once again for my misconduct and assure you that I am fully committed to earning back the trust and respect of the Wikipedia community through my future conduct.[[User:Sudsahab|Sudsahab]] ([[User talk:Sudsahab#top|talk]]) 17:46, 28 April 2024 (UTC)}} [[User:Sudsahab|Sudsahab]] ([[User talk:Sudsahab#top|talk]]) 17:46, 28 April 2024 (UTC) |
||
::That's weird: your Krishna account logged in on April 9, one minute before you logged in with this account. Also, your edits are remarkably similar to those of Thewikiuser1999. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 17:52, 28 April 2024 (UTC) |
::That's weird: your Krishna account logged in on April 9, one minute before you logged in with this account. Also, your edits are remarkably similar to those of Thewikiuser1999. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 17:52, 28 April 2024 (UTC) |
||
:::Yes, It was done when I was logging into my Sudsahab account on my phone in which the Krishna account was already logged in, I already acknowledged that the Krishna account was my first Wikipedia account. No, we are not same Thewikiuser1999 is heavily oriented around editing a certain cast (Brahmins) whereas I haven't done any of the caste supremacist edits. Please understand that we are not the same and I swear that I don't bag more than two devices so you can verify it with a checkuser. [[User:Sudsahab|Sudsahab]] ([[User talk:Sudsahab#top|talk]]) 18:15, 28 April 2024 (UTC) |
:::Yes, It was done when I was logging into my Sudsahab account on my phone in which the Krishna account was already logged in, I already acknowledged that the Krishna account was my first Wikipedia account. No, we are not same Thewikiuser1999 is heavily oriented around editing a certain cast (Brahmins) whereas I haven't done any of the caste supremacist edits. Please understand that we are not the same and I swear that I don't bag more than two or three devices so you can verify it with a checkuser. [[User:Sudsahab|Sudsahab]] ([[User talk:Sudsahab#top|talk]]) 18:15, 28 April 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:35, 28 April 2024
Welcome!
Hi Sudsahab! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! RegentsPark (comment) 18:44, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
RegentsPark (comment) 18:45, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
December 2023
Hello, Sudsahab, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Umarrizwan.ansari (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. RegentsPark (comment) 18:54, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Umarrizwan.ansari is my previous acc which got lost. Now i only use this sudsahab acc. i will contribute my best to wikipedia.Please dont block me Sudsahab (talk) 07:34, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- Don't worry. As long as you don't edit from multiple accounts, and since you've declared the old account, you're good. RegentsPark (comment) 16:49, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Gajapati invasion of Berar, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Imperial[AFCND] 17:33, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Bahmani invasion of Orissa, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Imperial[AFCND] 17:33, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Battle of Kunjpura, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 15:39, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siege of Etawah (1770), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Synorem (talk) 06:09, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- I'd like to expand on this by saying that asking for your edit to not be removed - in the edit itself - is not helpful. Synorem (talk) 06:10, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Draft talk:Capture of Delhi (1719). If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. microbiologyMarcus (petri dish·growths) 17:01, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Re Packer&Tracker. I noticed that you recently removed content from Siege of Chittorgarh (1567–1568) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Re Pa©ker&Tra©ker (♀) 00:53, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Sudsahab! Your additions to Qarachil Expedition have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.
- You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
- Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
- We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
- If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 20:05, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Sources
Hi, please see WP:RS and WP:SPS. HistoryofIran (talk) 00:04, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks,But u r removing reliable sources unneccssary
- Rise and Fall of The Maratha Empire 1750-1818
- Sanish Nandakumar ·
- is known historian of India. Sudsahab (talk) 05:06, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
- He's a "known historian of India", yet has only published one book, and isn't even a historian? [1]. HistoryofIran (talk) 13:38, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
Sieges
Hi! I appreciate your efforts to add articles about sieges, such as Siege of Etawah (1770). However, please note (especially when titling articles) that the word is spelled "siege", not "seige". I usually don't come to people's talk pages about typos, but since these typos have been made in article titles, I figured it was important to let you know. Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 14:32, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Moti Talab (1771) (December 27)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle of Moti Talab (1771) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, Sudsahab!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! microbiologyMarcus (petri dish·growths) 21:01, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
|
Minor edits
Hi Sudsahab! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. — Manticore 07:03, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Siege of Etawah (1770) for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siege of Etawah (1770) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Slatersteven (talk) 18:38, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
@Sudsahab, don't remove the unsigned template from your comment. Its non constructive to add a link to your userpage instead of a signature.Imperial[AFCND] 11:11, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- Hey, are you Manik from instagram? And were .Manik69, ManikSharma8969 and Umarrizwan.ansari your previous accounts got lost? Imperial[AFCND] 16:14, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
@Sudsahab, have you ever shared your articles in any of the platforms other than Wikipedia?Imperial[AFCND] 16:23, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- This is getting to look like fishing, please stop. Slatersteven (talk) 16:25, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- For a reason. How can we allow meatpuppetry? I have seen multiple newly created accounts editing in support of Sudsahab even in draft articles. I thought it was a coincidence but happened multiple times. I can provide the evidences for multiple incidents if you wish. Of this account and his early account named @Umarrizwan.ansari. Following the instagram lead I got from a user, I came to understand that there is a vast group acting behind all these. @HistoryofIran made his effort and banned multiple accounts by proving this. So please be aware of the situation. Imperial[AFCND] 16:32, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- It is allowed to remove unsigned templates, they don't do anything anyways. While I agree there is something fishy ongoing, interrogating users is not the way. If there are concerns (and at least somewhat definitive proof), they should be taken WP:ANI, WP:SPI or some other place. HistoryofIran (talk) 16:37, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- For a reason. How can we allow meatpuppetry? I have seen multiple newly created accounts editing in support of Sudsahab even in draft articles. I thought it was a coincidence but happened multiple times. I can provide the evidences for multiple incidents if you wish. Of this account and his early account named @Umarrizwan.ansari. Following the instagram lead I got from a user, I came to understand that there is a vast group acting behind all these. @HistoryofIran made his effort and banned multiple accounts by proving this. So please be aware of the situation. Imperial[AFCND] 16:32, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Gajapati invasion of Bidar (January 4)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gajapati invasion of Bidar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Siege of Gurumkonda (1770)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Siege of Gurumkonda (1770), was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:01, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Capture of Delhi (1760) has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Beland (talk) 04:50, 4 February 2024 (UTC)AfC notification: Draft:Capture of Delhi (1719) has a new comment
Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Moti Talab (1771) has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
The Herald (Benison) (talk) 10:06, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Capture of Delhi (1719) (February 12)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Capture of Delhi (1719) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Nomination of Battle of Chandighat (1771) for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Chandighat (1771) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Imperial[AFCND] 11:05, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
Disscussion
Hy fellow mate 👋. Can you create a further campaign of Krishnadevraya on his conquest of Orrisa against Gajapati Kingdom Mahratta.op (talk) 11:27, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- Okay Sudsahab (talk) 11:36, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry,i cant Sudsahab (talk) 11:41, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Gupta-Saka Wars has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Spinster300 (talk) 12:18, 14 March 2024 (UTC)- @Spinster300, hello. Please consider double checking before moving a WP:MILHIST related articles. One of the articles you recently accepted through AFC, doesn't pass WP:GNG, nor any WP:RS calls it by the name "Battle of Bahraich". I've initiated an AFD, and always check whether if any historian, or any WP:RS calls any military conflicts as "Battle of X", "Siege of X" or "X-Y War". Thanks. Imperial[AFCND] 13:45, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Dear ImperialAficionado, thank you so much for this notice. I decided to participate in WP:MILHIST articles today after many years. It looks like it is time for me to brush up before I continue. Kind regards, Spinster300 (talk) 16:37, 14 March 2024 (UTC).
Nomination of Battle of Bahraich (1034) for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Bahraich (1034) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Imperial[AFCND] 13:42, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Bahamani-Vijayanagara War (1418–1420) has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Utopes (talk / cont) 05:47, 15 March 2024 (UTC)Disambiguation link notification for March 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Farrukhnagar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mughal. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
March 2024
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lalitaditya Muktapida. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Imperial[AFCND] 12:16, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Fictional Flag of Bijapur Sultanate
Remove the Fictional flags u Added in the Articles of Battle of Pratapgarh, etc DeepstoneV (talk) 10:43, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Actually, its seems more like a personal attack onto me. If you have problem with the so called 'Fictional map' please contact the file uploader. Sudsahab (talk) 11:04, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- I am afraid that you may not know what WP:PA means. I strongly suggest you to remove that flags with no sourcing. Let me know from where you got such a depiction of flag, and what is the source for that. As long as I can't view any kind of source attached to it in commons. DeepstoneV (talk) 11:43, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Expansion of your article
Hey Sudsahab I'm very keen to expand Shivaji's Southern Campaign as it needs a little bit of cohesion, copy editing and more content, you can help. WhiteReaperPM (talk) 05:34, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 6
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Pratapgarh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Afzal Khan.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Umbarkhind (April 9)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle of Umbarkhind and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Leaving for studies
Sorry! Take care. Imperial[AFCND] 18:36, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Edit warring
Your recent editing history at Prince Salim's Invasion of Mewar shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Imperial[AFCND] 10:22, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Huh, this was indeed an amateurish move, Instead of discussing with me on the article's talk page you chose to put this template. Sudsahab (talk) 10:37, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
WP:NPA
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Siege of Kalinjar. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Imperial[AFCND] 19:43, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Maybe reverting disruptive edits of other users is harsh than this [2]
just keep your keyboard shut for sometime.
Sudsahab (talk) 06:26, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello Sudsahab and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.
A few features that you might find helpful:
- Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
- The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: {{WPMILHIST Announcements}}.
- The project Academy has lots of useful information about editing and writing military history articles. One very useful introductory course to get you started is Writing a good stub.
- Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
- The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
- We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
- We've developed a set of guidelines that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
- If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.
- If you would like to receive the project's monthly newsletter, The Bugle, please sign up here.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 10:36, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi
How is "A History of Jaipur" not reliable? I have already discussed that it doesn't come under WP:RAJ as it was completed after the death of Sarkar. Ranadhira (talk) 08:08, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Look the thing is the author Jadunath Sarkar is himself controversial (as we know he was a British knighted historian) so his works are untenable to be used in Wikipedia articles. You can ask/research more about this topic at RSN. Sudsahab (talk) 14:28, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Map of Vijayanagara
I reverted your edit on the Vijayanagara Empire article because you didn't check the talk page and didn't understand the context before disrupting. Please familiarize yourself with the background before making edits. DeepstoneV (talk) 15:32, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hi Sudsahab. Thank you for your work on Battle of Kunjpura. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Nice work
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 18:00, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hi Sudsahab. Thank you for your work on Siege of Lohkot (1015). Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Nice work
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 18:01, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hi Sudsahab. Thank you for your work on Krishnadevaraya's Bahamani Expedition. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Nice work
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 18:01, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hi Sudsahab. Thank you for your work on Siege of Baghdad (1625-1626). Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Thanks for your work
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 18:02, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hi Sudsahab. Thank you for your work on Battle of Tiruvadi. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Nice work
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 18:03, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello Sudsahab and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.
A few features that you might find helpful:
- Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
- The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: {{WPMILHIST Announcements}}.
- The project Academy has lots of useful information about editing and writing military history articles. One very useful introductory course to get you started is Writing a good stub.
- Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
- The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
- We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
- We've developed a set of guidelines that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
- If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.
- If you would like to receive the project's monthly newsletter, The Bugle, please sign up here.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 10:32, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
April 2024
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. PadFoot2008 16:50, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Drmies (talk) 16:52, 28 April 2024 (UTC) |
Sudsahab (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
- I assure you that I am committed to rectifying my mistakes and making amends for the damage I have caused. I pledge to adhere strictly to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines moving forward and to contribute constructively and transparently to the community. I have contributed to Wikipedia by creating many Wikipedia pages that are notable and participated in fruitful discussion to build a consensus so please give me a last chance to repent and change myself. I apologize once again for my misconduct and assure you that I am fully committed to earning back the trust and respect of the Wikipedia community through my future conduct.Sudsahab (talk) 17:46, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=This must be an error cause [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Sudsahab#December_2023] I had already disclosed my lost account. What I failed to acknowledge is my first Wikipedia account Krishna57edits which was banned for 2 weeks [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Krishna57edits#Blocked] I shouldn't had evaded that block. Other than this I have no connection to any of the accounts that was suspected here [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Thewikiuser1999/Archive] I have acknowledged my both accounts (one which was lost and the one which was banned for 2 weeks) therefore I am expressing my sincere remorse and regret for my involvement in sockpuppetry on Wikipedia. I acknowledge that my actions have violated Wikipedia's policies and undermined the integrity of the platform. I take full responsibility for my behavior and understand the serious consequences of engaging in such deceptive practices. :I assure you that I am committed to rectifying my mistakes and making amends for the damage I have caused. I pledge to adhere strictly to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines moving forward and to contribute constructively and transparently to the community. I have contributed to Wikipedia by creating many Wikipedia pages that are notable and participated in fruitful discussion to build a consensus so please give me a last chance to repent and change myself. I apologize once again for my misconduct and assure you that I am fully committed to earning back the trust and respect of the Wikipedia community through my future conduct.[[User:Sudsahab|Sudsahab]] ([[User talk:Sudsahab#top|talk]]) 17:46, 28 April 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=This must be an error cause [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Sudsahab#December_2023] I had already disclosed my lost account. What I failed to acknowledge is my first Wikipedia account Krishna57edits which was banned for 2 weeks [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Krishna57edits#Blocked] I shouldn't had evaded that block. Other than this I have no connection to any of the accounts that was suspected here [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Thewikiuser1999/Archive] I have acknowledged my both accounts (one which was lost and the one which was banned for 2 weeks) therefore I am expressing my sincere remorse and regret for my involvement in sockpuppetry on Wikipedia. I acknowledge that my actions have violated Wikipedia's policies and undermined the integrity of the platform. I take full responsibility for my behavior and understand the serious consequences of engaging in such deceptive practices. :I assure you that I am committed to rectifying my mistakes and making amends for the damage I have caused. I pledge to adhere strictly to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines moving forward and to contribute constructively and transparently to the community. I have contributed to Wikipedia by creating many Wikipedia pages that are notable and participated in fruitful discussion to build a consensus so please give me a last chance to repent and change myself. I apologize once again for my misconduct and assure you that I am fully committed to earning back the trust and respect of the Wikipedia community through my future conduct.[[User:Sudsahab|Sudsahab]] ([[User talk:Sudsahab#top|talk]]) 17:46, 28 April 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=This must be an error cause [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Sudsahab#December_2023] I had already disclosed my lost account. What I failed to acknowledge is my first Wikipedia account Krishna57edits which was banned for 2 weeks [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Krishna57edits#Blocked] I shouldn't had evaded that block. Other than this I have no connection to any of the accounts that was suspected here [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Thewikiuser1999/Archive] I have acknowledged my both accounts (one which was lost and the one which was banned for 2 weeks) therefore I am expressing my sincere remorse and regret for my involvement in sockpuppetry on Wikipedia. I acknowledge that my actions have violated Wikipedia's policies and undermined the integrity of the platform. I take full responsibility for my behavior and understand the serious consequences of engaging in such deceptive practices. :I assure you that I am committed to rectifying my mistakes and making amends for the damage I have caused. I pledge to adhere strictly to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines moving forward and to contribute constructively and transparently to the community. I have contributed to Wikipedia by creating many Wikipedia pages that are notable and participated in fruitful discussion to build a consensus so please give me a last chance to repent and change myself. I apologize once again for my misconduct and assure you that I am fully committed to earning back the trust and respect of the Wikipedia community through my future conduct.[[User:Sudsahab|Sudsahab]] ([[User talk:Sudsahab#top|talk]]) 17:46, 28 April 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
Sudsahab (talk) 17:46, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- That's weird: your Krishna account logged in on April 9, one minute before you logged in with this account. Also, your edits are remarkably similar to those of Thewikiuser1999. Drmies (talk) 17:52, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, It was done when I was logging into my Sudsahab account on my phone in which the Krishna account was already logged in, I already acknowledged that the Krishna account was my first Wikipedia account. No, we are not same Thewikiuser1999 is heavily oriented around editing a certain cast (Brahmins) whereas I haven't done any of the caste supremacist edits. Please understand that we are not the same and I swear that I don't bag more than two or three devices so you can verify it with a checkuser. Sudsahab (talk) 18:15, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- That's weird: your Krishna account logged in on April 9, one minute before you logged in with this account. Also, your edits are remarkably similar to those of Thewikiuser1999. Drmies (talk) 17:52, 28 April 2024 (UTC)