Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2007/Vote/Moreschi: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Line 99: Line 99:
# Doesn't have the temperament. — [[User talk:Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington|<span style="color:black">Nearly Headless Nick</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington|<span style="color:black; vertical-align:super; font-size:90%; font-weight:bold" title="Contributions">{C}</span>]] 08:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
# Doesn't have the temperament. — [[User talk:Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington|<span style="color:black">Nearly Headless Nick</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington|<span style="color:black; vertical-align:super; font-size:90%; font-weight:bold" title="Contributions">{C}</span>]] 08:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
#Uncomfortable with his temperament. [[User:Shem|Shem]]<sup>[[User talk:Shem|(talk)]]</sup> 09:51, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
#Uncomfortable with his temperament. [[User:Shem|Shem]]<sup>[[User talk:Shem|(talk)]]</sup> 09:51, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
#--[[User:Mcginnly|Mcginnly]] | [[User talk:Mcginnly|Natter]] 10:10, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:10, 3 December 2007

Please Note: Comments longer than two short sentences will be moved to the talk page.

Moreschi

Shall we begin, ladies and gentlemen? Even if not, it's nice to see you, to see you - nice! I typed out something lovely and then realized it was way too darn long: so as to not to disturb its artistic-rhetorical qualities, it's in a user subpage all for your delight right here. Cheerio! Moreschi Talk 21:19, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support

  1. I think Moreschi, while a bit conterversal, has what it takes to become an excellent arbcom member This is a Secret account 00:09, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. —Charles P._(Mirv) 00:11, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Displayed exemplary integrity in the recent Durova episode and the Fringe Theories Noticeboard is an outstanding contribution to the project. Cla68 00:12, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. *Dan T.* 00:15, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. spryde | talk 00:22, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 00:25, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. GracenotesT § 00:28, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Its about bloody time. Qst 00:28, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Antandrus (talk) 00:28, 3 December 2007 (UTC) Has exactly what it will take to be a good Arbcom member.[reply]
  10. Nick 00:31, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. east.718 at 00:32, December 3, 2007
  12. Support, apparently a straight shooter. • Lawrence Cohen 00:41, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13. BLACKKITE 00:43, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  14.  ALKIVAR™ ☢ 00:43, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  15. - auburnpilot talk 00:44, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Sluzzelin talk 00:55, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  17. ~ Riana ⁂ 00:55, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  18. --Agüeybaná 01:01, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Support. R. Baley 01:14, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Pharaoh of the Wizards 01:15, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Sean William @ 01:16, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  22. - Fedayee 01:21, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  23. maclean 01:38, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  24. krimpet⟲ 01:45, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  25. SQLQuery me! 01:48, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  26. looks ok—Random832 01:52, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Alexfusco5 02:15, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  28. We need a breath of fresh air. Mike H. Celebrating three years of being hotter than Paris 02:26, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Enthusiastically support Fowler&fowler«Talk» 02:49, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Moreschi is a good admin: I have no problems with him being an arbitrator. Acalamari 02:57, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  31. · AndonicO Talk 03:05, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Barely. ⇒SWATJester Son of the Defender 03:12, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Mercury 03:18, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Bob Mellish 03:29, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Videmus Omnia Talk 03:39, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Support. I've seen him do some excellent "mediation" work in Azerbaijan and Armenia related disputes and I like his take on nationalism in Wikipedia. Pocopocopocopoco 03:49, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Support -Dureo 04:08, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  38. — xaosflux Talk 04:55, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Good mediator, very intelligent, and works well with others. Firsfron of Ronchester 05:08, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  40. I dorftrottel I talk I 05:30, December 3, 2007
  41. Marvin Diode 05:31, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  42. RyanGerbil10(Говорить!) 05:41, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Spebi 05:57, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Isarig (talk) 06:03, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:05, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  46. WAS 4.250 07:08, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Yes. He gets it. MastCell Talk 07:13, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Justforasecond 07:37, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  49. - Crockspot 07:43, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Strong support One of the few admins who actually seems to care about core policies like NPOV. Independent-minded and prepared to make tough decisions. --Folantin 08:23, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  51. rspeer / ɹəədsɹ 08:49, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Support. Willing to put himself on the line to keep fringe-ists out and thus exactly the sort of person we need separating the useful from the useless at ArbCom. Relata refero 09:08, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Unqualified support. From one of the longest-serving editors here. I particularly like his views on discussing content issues with expertsedward (buckner) 09:15, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Viriditas 09:19, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Needs to have his temperament checked from time to time, but has the right priorities. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:37, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

  1. Extended comments moved to talk page. Nishkid64 (talk) 00:04, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Rschen7754 (T C) 00:05, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Kwsn (Ni!) 00:07, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. futurebird 00:19, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Chaz Beckett 00:20, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Nufy8 00:29, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. — Rlevse • Talk • 00:32, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Oppose--U.S.A.U.S.A.U.S.A. 00:43, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Oppose Cooler heads are needed for arbcom. –priyanath talk 00:48, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Prodego talk 00:52, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Tim Q. Wells 00:52, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. --Docg 01:01, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Captain panda 01:09, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Oppose, because of his serious personal attacks on editors, and his recent nomination of Kelly Martin for adminship. [1] SlimVirgin (talk)(contribs) 01:23, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  15. W.marsh 01:28, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  16. GRBerry 01:29, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Crum375 01:45, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Absolutely not. --Coredesat 02:00, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  19. (Sarah777 02:12, 3 December 2007 (UTC))[reply]
  20. bibliomaniac15 02:18, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Oppose SlimVirgin makes a valid point and someone who disapproves of RFA [2] I can't support.--Sandahl 02:19, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Acts too much on instinct- ArbCom relies upon weighing options. --Rodhullandemu (please reply here - contribs) 02:28, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  23. ¿Amar៛Talk to me/My edits 02:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  24. B 02:35, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Oppose Thatcher131 02:37, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Rebecca 02:42, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Especially unimpressed with his answer to Jreferee's question and the second paragraph of his answer to I's. —Cryptic 02:44, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Per SlimVirgin and Kelly Martin opinions. Dihydrogen Monoxide ♫ 02:49, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Zginder (talk) (Contrib) 03:04, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Regretfully. Húsönd 03:22, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 03:44, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  32. - KNM Talk 04:37, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  33. TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 06:09, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  34. AniMate 06:47, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Oppose - Jeeny (talk) 06:52, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  36. --MONGO 08:14, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Lara❤Love 08:23, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Doesn't have the temperament. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 08:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Uncomfortable with his temperament. Shem(talk) 09:51, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  40. --Mcginnly | Natter 10:10, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2007/Vote/Moreschi&oldid=175452394"