Jump to content

Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Lemmey (talk | contribs)
Lemmey (talk | contribs)
Line 44: Line 44:
*Chinese dam breach is an ITN-worthy story as well, I think. Updated and sourced article, great impact as one of the earthquake consequences. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 08:16, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
*Chinese dam breach is an ITN-worthy story as well, I think. Updated and sourced article, great impact as one of the earthquake consequences. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 08:16, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
:I've been looking for Sichuan earthquake blurb, but the info on the most recent developments at [[Tangjiashan Lake]] (I assume you mean that to be the emboldened link) is a bit fuzzy - e.g. only one sentence on the new sluice channel and very little detail on the engineering effort. Also, [[Beichuan]] is not a town, though Reuters apparently can't figure that out. - [[User:BanyanTree|Banyan]][[User talk:BanyanTree|Tree]] 11:28, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
:I've been looking for Sichuan earthquake blurb, but the info on the most recent developments at [[Tangjiashan Lake]] (I assume you mean that to be the emboldened link) is a bit fuzzy - e.g. only one sentence on the new sluice channel and very little detail on the engineering effort. Also, [[Beichuan]] is not a town, though Reuters apparently can't figure that out. - [[User:BanyanTree|Banyan]][[User talk:BanyanTree|Tree]] 11:28, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
::The town (whatever that is) is evacuated not abandoned. There were still people living there at the time of the quake. Abandoned implies it was one of those towns relocated when they built the dam. --[[User_talk:Lemmey |Lemmey]] [[It's Obvious You Won't Survive By Your Wits Alone | talk]] 12:17, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
::The town (whatever that is) is evacuated not abandoned. There were still people living there at the time of the quake. Abandoned implies it is the remains of one of those towns relocated when they built the dam. --[[User_talk:Lemmey |Lemmey]] [[It's Obvious You Won't Survive By Your Wits Alone | talk]] 12:17, 10 June 2008 (UTC)


==June 9==
==June 9==

Revision as of 12:19, 10 June 2008

This page provides editors a forum to suggest items for inclusion in Template:In the news (ITN), a protected Main Page template, as well as the forum for discussion of candidates.

This candidates page is integrated with the daily pages of Portal:Current events. Under each daily section header below is the transcluded Portal:Current events items for that day (with a light green header). Each day's portal page is followed by a subsection for suggestions and discussion.

Suggestions

In order to suggest a candidate:

  • Start, find or modify a blurb directly in the light green box for that day's Current events.
  • Update an article linked to from the blurb to include the recent developments, or find an article that has already been updated.
  • Nominate the blurb for ITN inclusion under that day's ITN Candidates subheading, emboldening the link to the updated article.
    For standard entry styles, please see WP:In the news section on the Main Page/Style.
Samantha Harvey in 2019
Samantha Harvey

There are criteria guiding the decision on whether or not to put a particular item on In the news, based largely on the extensiveness of the updated content and the perceived significance of the recent developments. Submissions that do not follow the guidelines at Wikipedia:In the news section on the Main Page will not be put into the live template.

Sample candidate discussion

It doesn't seem to have any references for the new content. --They've also signed their comment 12:06, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
I went ahead and added some citations. It should be ready now. --User's Name 12:07, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
Looks good. Posted. --Responding administrator 12:10, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

And so on. When continuing the discussion please refrain from using dot points/bullets to allow the candidates to stand out from the discussion. Indent your comments for clarity.

Please refrain from straight support or oppose votes; instead the discussion can focus on the relative merits of the available candidate items.

Template:In the news/Next update/Time Recent changes to ITN candidates pages

June 10

ITN Candidates

Support as nominator (at least if/when the article is updated). -- Grant.Alpaugh 05:12, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support when (if) they actually resign. --Tone 08:16, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Article not updated. SpencerT♦C 10:52, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Chinese dam breach is an ITN-worthy story as well, I think. Updated and sourced article, great impact as one of the earthquake consequences. --Tone 08:16, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've been looking for Sichuan earthquake blurb, but the info on the most recent developments at Tangjiashan Lake (I assume you mean that to be the emboldened link) is a bit fuzzy - e.g. only one sentence on the new sluice channel and very little detail on the engineering effort. Also, Beichuan is not a town, though Reuters apparently can't figure that out. - BanyanTree 11:28, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The town (whatever that is) is evacuated not abandoned. There were still people living there at the time of the quake. Abandoned implies it is the remains of one of those towns relocated when they built the dam. --Lemmey talk 12:17, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 9

ITN Candidates

nominate & support: seems to be clearly news worthy. --Imagemonth (talk) 19:52, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Is there an updated article that could be bold-linked? This seems important, but I would like to see an article with citations to show this. Random89 20:14, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It appears to be FLOPS, which has one updated sentence. This would need more updated content before I would post it. - BanyanTree 22:05, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, I just realized it's IBM Roadrunner. That's in better shape but it could still do with a few more citations. What do folks think? - BanyanTree 03:29, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I like it, especially since it has its own Wikipedia article. Not exactly "big news" but certainly "in the news" and the article is already more informative than any of the news coverage I had seen of this. Dragons flight (talk) 03:39, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
strong support a cursory look at google news will illustrate that it is newsworthy and international in scope. Definitely deserves front page mention, in the above edited version (which links the IBM roadrunner article). --Steve Johnsenson (talk) 04:41, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Posted. The article has gained quite a few more citations than it had before. - BanyanTree 11:17, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Nominate Ukraine mine one; some good news, a little bad, and in Eastern Europe, for some balance. BobAmnertiopsisChitChat Me! 20:11, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The article one the collapse is currently only 2 paragraphs long (but quite well sourced). A bit of expansion would be nice, but I suppose this could go up as is if needed. Random89 20:15, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'll try and work on it. BobAmnertiopsisChitChat Me! 20:40, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support. -- Grant.Alpaugh 23:45, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The article looks decent...though as usual, picture are good (but the chances are slim). Weak, Weak Support...only one miner was killed and 13 went missing: Generally this isn't a big mine accident. I only support because it has its own article. SpencerT♦C 23:56, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support as mine safety is more encyclopedic than a stabbing spree. --Lemmey talk 00:30, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Posted. Thanks, BanyanTree 00:44, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No, thank you. BobAmnertiopsisChitChat Me! 00:56, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Portal talk:Current events/2024 November 16 Portal talk:Current events/2024 November 15 Portal talk:Current events/2024 November 14