Jump to content

User talk:Chamal N: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Wandalstouring (talk | contribs)
Filper01 (talk | contribs)
→‎Semi-retired: new section
Line 418: Line 418:


I've been introducing this to wikipedians I found here and there. [[Imagine (song)|And I wonder...]] should I send this to [[User:Jimbo Wales|Jimbo?]] <sup>^[[User:Zheliel/Guest Book|Sign]] </sup><small>[[User:Zheliel|Zhe]]</small><sup>[[User:Zheliel/userboxes|*]]</sup><small>[[User:Zheliel|liel]]</small><sup> [[User talk:Zheliel|Talk]]</sup> 12:27, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
I've been introducing this to wikipedians I found here and there. [[Imagine (song)|And I wonder...]] should I send this to [[User:Jimbo Wales|Jimbo?]] <sup>^[[User:Zheliel/Guest Book|Sign]] </sup><small>[[User:Zheliel|Zhe]]</small><sup>[[User:Zheliel/userboxes|*]]</sup><small>[[User:Zheliel|liel]]</small><sup> [[User talk:Zheliel|Talk]]</sup> 12:27, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

== Semi-retired ==

Awwwww.... <font face="Times New Roman">[[User:Filper01|<font color="red">'''Filper01'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Filper01|<font color="yellow">'''Chat'''</font>]], [[Special:Contributions/Filper01|<font color="purple">'''My contribs'''</font>]])</font> 09:14, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:14, 28 February 2009

User Talk Edits Email Sandbox Guestbook


User:Chamal N/Talkheader

DYK for Battle of Gannoruwa

Updated DYK query On February 6, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Battle of Gannoruwa, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Dravecky (talk) 20:32, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

25 DYK's!

The 25 DYK Medal
Congratulations on getting 25 articles through DYK. Keep it up! :) —Ed 17 (Talk / Contribs) 03:51, 8 February 2009 (UTC) [reply]
No....I didn't stalk your contribs... —Ed 17 (Talk / Contribs) 03:51, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, pal. And ok, I believe you :) Chamal talk 04:16, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
25! :O I gotta get working nao. —La Pianista (TC) 04:21, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
(@ Chamal) Warning: you may be too trusting.
(@ Pianista) Nice work. :P —Ed 17 (Talk / Contribs) 04:26, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It was for your sake! >:( ;)La Pianista (TC) 04:29, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
@ Ed: You lied???? :O
@ Pianista: You'll have plenty of time to catch up. I'm planning to minimize editing (well, almost) sometime next month... now haven't we heard that before? I won't be focusing much on DYK anyway, there are some battle articles that need to be improved :) Chamal talk 04:34, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
And I'm supposed to be on reduced editing as well. What happened to that idea, I wondah? —La Pianista (TC) 04:35, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I thought about it, but how would I live without you guys? :) —Ed 17 (Talk / Contribs) 04:38, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
And with comments like those, I'm not supposed to be suspicious? Yeah right! —La Pianista (TC) 04:45, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

HELP!

Alright, I give up. I can't fix my sig. I know you're offline at the moment (or so says your status), but whenever you're available, please help me customize my signature. I'd like it to go along the lines of something like this: Whip it! Now whip it good! with these colors and some fancy fonts, like

this

. I'm not terribly good with HTML, by the way, but I really want to know how to do this myself so I won't have to ask for help each time I want to change my sig. --Crackthewhip775 (talk) 07:17, 8 February 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Hello. I'm not Chamal - a friend of his though, and I'm willing to help. :) Here's your sig - Whip it! Now whip it good!
Here is the code:
<font face="comic sans ms">[[User:Crackthewhip775|<font color="F08080">W<font color="E9967A">h<font color="salmon">i<font color="DC143C">p <font color="B22222">i<font color="8B0000">t!]] <sup>[[User talk:Crackthewhip775|Now whip it good!]]</font></sup>
Font color specifies the color you choose, and font face specifies the face. Sup is for superscript. All it takes is a very close look - you can learn it yourself, as I did.
Hope this helps,
La Pianista (TC) 07:34, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ah... the Wikijaguar saves the day again. Well, nothing left for me to do I guess. If there's anything else, please ask :) Chamal talk 12:38, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Jaguar? Kinky. :P
Actually, I've flopped with that, and I'm trying to fix it right now. But the jaguar will take care of that, too. —La Pianista (TC) 00:46, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
How's this one:
Whip it! Now whip it good!
<font face="comic sans">[[User:Crackthewhip775|<span style="color:#C66">Wh</span><span style="color:#600">ip</span> <span style="color:#C33">it</span><span style="color:#900">!</span>]] [[User talk:Crackthewhip775|<sup>Now whip it good!</sup>]]</font>
I've used "comic sans" and not "comic sans ms", which gives it the formatting you showed. The colour combination is not very pretty, sorry about that :) Change the colours using the codes in this table (since it's shorter than the hex codes, it takes up less space). The "#" symbol should be in front or it won't work. Are there any changes to be made? Chamal talk 04:07, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Again, I apologize for the long wait for my reply, but thank you, it works! --Whip it! Now whip it good! 04:36, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Great! Glad to help :) Chamal talk 04:40, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your wording is quite neutral and acceptable. Please feel free to make the change. Best Wishes Kerr avon (talk) 14:04, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey ... Thanks

Hey there Chamal, just saw the post about Help Desk templates .. THANKS!! - never knew they existed! — Ched (talk) 15:55, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost, February 8, 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 5, Issue 6 8 February 2009 About the Signpost

News and notes: Elections, licensing update, and more Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia's future, WikiDashboard, and "wiki-snobs" 
Dispatches: April Fools 2009 mainpage WikiProject Report: WikiProject Music 
Features and admins The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 15:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 21:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC) [reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXV (January 2009)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter Issue XXXV (January 2009)
Project news
  • Don't forget the six-monthly Coordinator elections will take place in March for the April-September term. If you want to become more involved in the project, now's the time to start thinking about it!
  • Upon the improvement of World War I and Alexander the Great to Featured Article, Lead Coordinator Roger Davies has pledged to donate US$250 per article to the Wikimedia Foundation. This pledge is listed at the bounty board and will expire on 31 December 2009. The two articles are both listed at the Special Projects Department as the second and ninth most frequently-read MILHIST articles.
  • Following extensive discussion, the structure of the A-Class Medal System has been changed to include three new medals: The A-Class Medal with Oak Leaves, the A-Class Medal with Oakleaves and Swords, and the A-Class Medal with Oakleaves, Swords, and Diamonds, each of which is respectfully awarded after 5, 10, and 20 groups of three A-Class Articles.
  • The number of our A-Class articles grew by more than 25% during this month, compared to the total number of A-Class articles existent at the end of December.
  • Following a successful RfA, Cam has been promoted to administrator.
Articles of note

New featured articles:

  1. Alaska class cruiser
  2. Bruce Kingsbury
  3. Fred Moosally
  4. Isaac Shelby
  5. Maryland and Virginia Rifle Regiment
  6. Operation Brevity
  7. Operation Uranus
  8. SS Minnesotan
  9. Stanley Goble
  10. Tetrarch (tank)
  11. USS Iowa (BB-61)
  12. USS Iowa turret explosion
  13. Woodes Rogers

New featured lists:

  1. List of Second Boer War Victoria Cross recipients

New featured topics:

  1. Adriatic campaign of 1807-1814

New A-Class articles:

  1. Battle of Aachen
  2. Battle of Grand Port
  3. Battle of Kaiapit
  4. Bob Chappuis
  5. Dreadnought
  6. Elmer Gedeon
  7. George Alan Vasey
  8. George Julian Howell
  9. Heinrich Bär
  10. James Newland
  11. John S. McCain, Jr.
  12. Landing at Saidor
  13. List of tanks in the Spanish Civil War
  14. M249 squad automatic weapon
  15. Military history of Australia during World War II
  16. Neil Hamilton Fairley
  17. North Yemen Civil War
  18. Operation Cobra
  19. Operation Winter Storm
  20. Operation Totalize
  21. Percy Statton
  22. Port Chicago disaster
  23. SM U-14 (Austria-Hungary)
  24. SS Timothy Bloodworth
  25. Tom Derrick
  26. U-1 class submarine (Austria-Hungary)
  27. U-3 class submarine (Austria-Hungary)
  28. William Bostock
  29. Willie Gillis
  30. Yamato class battleship
Current proposals and discussions
  • A drive is underway to identify the core topics of World War I with the aim of improving their quality before the centenary of the start of World War I in 2014.
  • A Survey is currently underway to determine how MilHist's processes, logistics, and management can be improved.
Awards and honors

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:59, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXV (January 2009)

The January 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:20, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Hey man, I haven't seen you around in awhile. I took a bit of a break from RE patrolling. I got bored and fired up Huggle for the first time in a lonnnngggg time. I'm back and ready to rock, though. Knippschild (talk) 06:42, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Nice to hear from you again. I haven't been huggling too much either. With the bugs and slowness in the new versions, I had to switch to 0.7.12 again. Anyway I'm a bit busy in real life now so most of the time I can spend here, I'm trying to focus on improving some articles. Chamal talk 11:23, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! I had to get it renamed as an effort to vanish use of my real name. Last night I had an issue with some wikitrolls stalking me, calling my personal cell number, IMing me, et cetera. While I know that the damage is already done, I am trying to exercise damage control and reduce issues in the future. I'm currently seeking petition to be nominated as a Sysop to help my role in being vigilant (in the good way) against vandalism. Any ideas *wink*? Alpha 4615 (talk) 21:58, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Frankly, I think it's too early for you to think of becoming an admin. You have less than 2000 edits, and very little experience in article writing. Being a vandal fighter, you'd have a lot of experience in dealing with difficult situations and editors, but that alone will not gain you a lot of support at WP:RFA. Most people like to see admin candidates participating in areas like WP:XFD, WP:AN etc in addition to article writing. Participating in these areas will show that you have a good knowledge on Wikipedia policies and guidelines, something that will impress a lot of people and also help to gain their trust. I think the best thing for you would be to wait a little longer, get some more experience and then go for it. Chamal talk 12:14, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Triple Crown jewels

Your majesty, it gives me great pleasure to bestow the Triple Crown upon Chamal N for your contributions in the areas of WP:DYK, WP:GA, and WP:FC. Cirt (talk) 10:52, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for contributions to the project, Great work, especially on List of Prime Ministers of Sri Lanka - great job on the sourcing. May you wear the crowns well. Cirt (talk) 10:52, 12 February 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Thanks, Cirt. Chamal talk 11:50, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Viewpoint & Advice Needed

Hey Chamal. I'm going through some stuff right now that requires attention from administrators/arbcom. I've made a post in AN/I - can you please advise? Alpha 4615 (talk) 18:30, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you should read Wikipedia:HARASS#Dealing_with_harassment. I think you're doing fine right now. The deletion of the article is not an issue; that seems to be perfectly ok, but the problem here is the offwiki harassment. However, I'm not in any position to take any action against this, and the best place is AN/I (which you have done). You can get some help from very experienced editors there. Let's see how things turn out. Chamal talk 12:00, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

O.K!

bye bye! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.168.189.101 (talk) 08:48, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Err... what is this about? Chamal talk 11:50, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

LRRP

Ayubowan! it just doesn't feel right to have that section there in the intro. i hope understand y. "launching attacks on...civilians"! i dont know if putting a reference would help. And also can u help me with creating an article 4 king parakramabahu VI? i wrote it many times and got deleted. once sm1 said he's not a noteworthy personality or smthing as da reason 4 deleting! im going 2 find sm info on him and try writing again. TIA--Sandeepani 11:23, 13 February 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Svm1 63 (talkcontribs)

Ayubowan! (feels nice to use that here :)) We have to include that info in the lead, since that is something important about the unit. We must record their achievements, but we also have to record their faults/accusations against them. That's how neutrality of an article can be maintained. When we give information about something, we have to include both sides of the story, even if one is completely false.
As for the Parakramabahu VI article, I can help you with it. He was quite a notable king and there's no reason Wikipedia can't have an article on him. What we have to do is make the article verifiable, and say why he is notable. Tell me when you are going to make it and I'll definitely help. Chamal talk 11:47, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

my blog

http://spittlespat.blogspot.com/ --Spittlespat 17:32, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nice :) But you really should stop leaving friendly messages on people's talk pages without making any mainspace contributions (your last was on Feb. 6, followed by a load of user talk edits). As I (and others) have told you before, a lot of people will not take kindly to this kind of behaviour. Chamal talk 02:06, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Government spending
All Ceylon Tamil Congress
Sri Lanka Muslim Congress
Anna Howard Shaw
Knowledge Adventure
Ulster Liberal Party
Tamil National Alliance
Eurasia
European Radicals in Sri Lanka
East Siberian Sea
Dolores Hidalgo
Physiological tolerance
Eelam People's Revolutionary Liberation Front
Tamil Eelam Army
University of Illinois Press
Eelam People's Democratic Party
Automobilclub von Deutschland
Operation Währung
Cilician Gates
Cleanup
Sinhala Only Act
V for Vendetta (film)
Babs and Buster Bunny
Merge
Bluebottle (character)
Tacticity
Colombo 1 - Fort
Add Sources
Siege of Tyre
Cyberathlete Amateur League
Biopolymer
Wikify
Tamils Rehabilitation Organisation
Joseph Pararajasingham
Point Pedro
Expand
KFC
Echinoderm
Fiat (policy debate)

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 06:18, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You got mail

Sebastian 21:02, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Replied. Chamal talk 02:28, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost — February 16, 2009

The Signpost
Volume 5, Issue 7
Weekly Delivery
2009-02-16

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist.
If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 06:10, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

The Creator of the Barnstar
I hereby award this Barnstar to Chamal N for his excellent work creating the Press Barnstar. Nutiketaiel (talk) 13:31, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


The barnstar looks great, Chamal. You have a gift with images. Nutiketaiel (talk) 13:31, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Whoah! Thanks a lot, Nutiketaiel! I get an award for making just one barnstar? :) Chamal talk 13:34, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well, if it's a good one, you do.  :-) At least, I think you should. That Barnstar looks really snazzy, so I think you deserve an award for it. Nutiketaiel (talk) 13:37, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

THANKS!

Dear Chamal N, Thanks so much for your first edit day wishes, as well as your wishes for my health. I am doing better, and now it's just school that's preoccupying my life :) Best of wishes right back at you! --lovelaughterlife♥talk? 02:37, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome :) Good to hear you're better now. Happy editing! Chamal talk 11:39, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks


WikiNation

Remeber Wikination, well it now has it's own wikia!!!! Here it is if you want to join it http://wikitopia.wikia.com/wiki/WikiTopia Darkside2000 (talk) 13:06, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Darkside2000. But I really don't have time time for this kind of thing now, or even for editing Wikipedia. Chamal talk 14:21, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
:O I hope RL is alright, friend... :/ —Ed 17 (Talk / Contribs) 14:28, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Ed. Nothing wrong with real life, just busy :) I'll pop in from time to time, probably during weekends. Chamal talk 14:34, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Alright. Good luck keeping up with your schedule, and keep in touch :) —Ed 17 (Talk / Contribs) 14:43, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost — February 23, 2009

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 8, which includes these articles:

The kinks are still being worked out in a new design for these Signpost deliveries, and we apologize for the plain format for this week.

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 01:13, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RFA

Dear Chamal, slightly belated post holiday thanks for your support in my RFA which this time was successful, I was very flattered by your comment "a good editor who acts sensibly and with a lot of clue" and will try to live up to it. The full Oscar acceptance speech version of my Thankspam is here :-) WereSpielChequers 00:39, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment about the edit fights

Well said! Your message is to the point and determined while still being respectful. Engaging both sides in a constructive discussion is the best solution. Unfortunately, it may require the mediator to put in lots of time, especially when non-members are involved. As for me, I currently don't have that time, which is why I proposed WP:SLR#Simple version: Don't re-revert!, as a rule that doesn't take much time to enforce. I would be happy if you could comment on it and/or improve it; it would always be useful as a fallback mechanism. — Sebastian 08:00, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your idea seems excellent to me. This might just be the solution to stop edit warring. I'll look into it more thoroughly and comment at there. Chamal talk 11:40, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Gannoruwa

I'm reviewing Battle of Gannoruwa and would ask you to improve the article in order to make it pass GAC. Wandalstouring (talk) 09:27, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. It's been so long I had forgotten, and I don't check my watchlist very often now. I'll make a reply (when I have time) to some of your comments where clarification is needed, but apart from that, I'm currently not in a position to improve the article. Particularly the RS problem is there; if you think the newspapers are not reliable enough, then there are no better sources to be found except the few books I have already included. We don't have that many good books etc giving detailed info on our history. The occasional article appearing in a newspaper is the best we can actually hope for. Anyway, I suggest you fail the article straight away, since I can't improve it now. Maybe I'll get round to it some time later :) Chamal talk 11:30, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Your newspapers need sources to write articles. It's best you find out who wrote the newspaper articles and ask her/him if he can help you finding some sources. Sorry, but you're argumentation that there aren't more sources isn't acceptable, there are. There are certainly Portuguese sources about the events. Try the Portuguese embassy in your country, they are usually well aware of one countries history and are likely able to help you. When asking them, write that you want to publish an article about these events in an online media(if you mention wikipedia they may be inclined to fail you). Next step can be a university's history departement where you blatantly ask an academic on that field if he can point you to some sources about the topic. Wandalstouring (talk) 10:47, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I should have made it clear; these are the best that I can find at the moment. Of course, if I really get down to it I would be able to find something. A lot of Sinhalese language books can be found on the subject (and I can't write an English article with only Sinhalese sources), but not many others can be found easily. Anyway, this is just an article I wrote, not a research thesis ;) I can't put such a lot of effort into uncovering sources right now since I am busy in real life. I won't be improving the article to meet the requirements in the near future. When I get the chance some time later, I will work on it again. Therefore, I suggest you fail the GAN now. Or should I withdraw it? Thanks for the detailed review, it will certainly be helpful to me or anyone else who'd be trying to improve the article later on :) Chamal talk 11:34, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I don't want to put any pressure on you, take your time because it's quality that matters, not speed. There's no problem using lots of foreign language sources for an article. Most likely the subject will be covered in Sinhalese and Portuguese and in the age of web 2.0 it's easy to get a rough translation of these. If you come across Portuguese sources you can't decipher post it in MILHIST Linguistics. They'll find someone to help you. I'll fail the article as you wish. Wandalstouring (talk) 13:59, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki RP

User:Zheliel/Wiki RP

I've been introducing this to wikipedians I found here and there. And I wonder... should I send this to Jimbo? ^Sign Zhe*liel Talk 12:27, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-retired

Awwwww.... Filper01 (Chat, My contribs) 09:14, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]