User talk:Smkolins: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:48, 17 November 2009

Welcome!

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! D. J. Bracey (talk) 19:37, 2 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Archives

Notability of Badi School (Panama)

A tag has been placed on Badi School (Panama) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mhking (talk) 21:53, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of Baha'is

Other wikipedia pages can't be references for a Wikipedia article. I would go back to Violet Riga's version, and only put back people with a required <ref> tag. It's the only way to go. Regards, -- Jeff3000 (talk) 12:10, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Other bad articles don't make an excuse for more bad articles. We have to try to meet the Wikipedia policies. Regards, -- Jeff3000 (talk) 12:50, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can see some logic in not having a list of Baha'is. The list could potentially get large and unmanageable, not to mention useless. I support keeping a list of only the most notable individuals, and keep a good reference on the page. Cuñado ☼ - Talk 05:25, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The pages that have categories for Baha'i individuals have references on those pages that they are Baha'is. Referencing is a must. -- Jeff3000 (talk) 12:01, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding "School of the Nations (Bahá'í - Macau)"

Anything related to Macau is welcome. I added the project banner to the article's talk page and it's now part of the project. I also noticed that no other articles are linked to "School of the Nations (Bahá'í - Macau)"; you might want to introduce links in related articles. Josuechan (talk) 17:42, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"F"

We've always used the capital "F" since part of the proper noun of the religion, and we should continue to do so. Using "Faith" as itself, however I would say is discouraged, and instead we should use religion. -- Jeff3000 (talk) 15:19, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Manual of Style

Hi Smkolins, the Manual of Style states that headings should be in sentence case, which means that only the first word should be capitalized, as opposed to every word being capitilized. So sections like "See Also" are against the manual of style, but should be "See also". Of course if a noun is a proper noun, then it should remain capitalized. So a section title like "In Christianity" would be fine. Regards, -- Jeff3000 (talk) 04:07, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bahá'í Faith in the United Kingdom

On 22 February, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bahá'í Faith in the United Kingdom, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 12:07, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats on starting a page that is on the front page. Regards, -- Jeff3000 (talk) 13:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - you did a lot of work cleaning up the refs - thank you!--Smkolins (talk) 14:44, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent work!

I have to say i am impressed with this particular article: Bahá'í Faith in Vietnam. Its very rare to walk across such a gem of a new page. Nicely Wikified, excellent sourcing and categorizing, and no rule whatsoever that even looks remotely violated. Keep up the great work, i love seeing this kind of pages during newpage patrol! Excirial^{(Talk,Contribs)} 22:24, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

From the looks of it, you have not received a barnstar for your editing efforts yet. I think its high time someone awards you one, so ill just be the one who does.

		The Editor's Barnstar
		For creating several magnificent articles, and making my Newpage Patrol highly enjoyable, I award you a well earned Editors Barnstar! Excirial^{(Talk,Contribs)} 22:32, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - I'm still learning the {{cite}} style but I have I think contributing some good articles - nice to see someone else agree! I have had help of course - excellent work in the field so I can find refs and from wikipedia editors like Jeff3000.--Smkolins (talk) 22:51, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Baha'i content

Hello,

I've seen the Baha'i related content you have added and it looks great. I'd love if you'd contribute any articles that can't be included in wikipedia about the Faith that you've written to Bahaikipedia.

Best, T0lk (talk) 05:30, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Date format

Date formats in the accessdate= and date= fields have to be written in the International ISO format (yyyy-mm-dd), not the American format (mm-dd-yyyy). The ISO format allows the dates to be linked, and not appear as red links, as well as allowing the dates to be easily sorted. Regards, -- Jeff3000 (talk) 15:47, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bahá'í Faith in Brazil

Thank you for letting me know about this draft,I'll do what I can to organize this draft and develop in to a well structured article, if you don't know portuguese I can translate it.I really think you gave me a good idea in developing an article for Leonora Armstrong because she is very important for the Bahá'í Faith history in Brazil.Well anyway yes I'm from Brazil,and if you need to get in contact with me make yourself free. Regards, -- Fresh Prince Of Brazil (talk) 01:04, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think the article needs some more work especially in the last few sections. Especially the bulleted list is not good style. I think you should have waited a little longer before posting it. -- Jeff3000 (talk) 02:50, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another issue as I'm reading the article further is that a lot of the sources for the lower sections are the BIC. It would be much much better, and in my mind almost necessary, if there were some some references that were third-party. -- Jeff3000 (talk) 03:18, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll talk on it's talk page.--Smkolins (talk) 15:16, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bahá'í Faith in Brazil

On 18 March, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bahá'í Faith in Brazil, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 13:58, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bahá'í

Redirects As you can see, I changed the redirect [[Bahá'í]] to [[Bahá'í Faith|Bahá'í]]. -Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:00, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeup. Saw it right as you were filling this in....--Smkolins (talk) 03:02, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bahá'í Faith in South Africa

On 30 March, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bahá'í Faith in South Africa, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 11:26, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bahá'í Faith in Cameroon

On 4 April, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bahá'í Faith in Cameroon, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Bobet 13:31, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't tag it

71.117.39.195 (talk · contribs) tagged the article originally, I just fixed the malformed prod tag. I have no opinion on the article's quality. --Closedmouth (talk) 05:15, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you disagree with the article's deletion, just remove the prod tag, that's how prod works. Check out WP:PROD. --Closedmouth (talk) 03:37, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Bahá'í Faith in Denmark

On 10 April, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bahá'í Faith in Denmark, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Bencherlite ^Talk 10:13, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bahá'í Faith in Denmark

Hello. Please see my edits to Bahá'í Faith in Denmark. You shouldn't capitalize an initial letter merely because it's in a section heading. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style on headings. Michael Hardy (talk) 16:05, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Scottkolins.png

hi did you take this pic?Genisock2 (talk) 13:29, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you ask? I thought that was the point of the copyright submission. Is there a problem?--Smkolins (talk) 00:02, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Bahá'í Faith in Kenya

On 12 April, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bahá'í Faith in Kenya, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Bobet 22:53, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

School vandal

At this point, they have had more than enough warnings. You should, if you have not already, report them to AiV. ---RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 15:02, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, sorry... AiV is :Administrator intervention against vandalism, which is where you go to report someone who has received the requisite number of warnings and yet continues to vandalize. It is self-explanatory, but if you need any help, just ask me. Cheers! ---RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 22:56, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination

Hi. I've nominated Bahá'í Faith in Niger, an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the hook for the article at Template talk:Did you know#Articles created/expanded on May 5, where you can improve it if you see fit. Thanks, RyRy5 (talk ♠ Review) 00:34, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bahá'í Faith in Niger

On 10 May, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bahá'í Faith in Niger, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 08:36, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Faith in the Bahá'í Faith

An article that you have been involved in editing, Faith in the Bahá'í Faith, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faith in the Bahá'í Faith. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ecoleetage (talk) 01:19, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move

I've gone ahead and moved the page, you should now fix all the redirects. Regards, -- Jeff3000 (talk) 20:39, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Institution names

Allah-u-Abha! According to the manual of style the names of specific institutions should be capitalized but the names of generic ones should not (example: Stanford University vs. a university) so I think "assembly" or "spiritual assembly" might be lowercase, but "National Spiritual Assembly of the Baha'is of the United States" would be capitalized. That's merely my interpretation. It's a lovely day today, I hope you're doing well where you are. Peter Deer (talk) 21:50, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. Well insofar as that is concerned specifically a Baha'i house of worship would be a Mashriqu'l-Adhkár in Arabic, but I'm not sure in that regard as the Manual of Style doesn't cover whether things like Church, Mosque, Synagogue etc. should be capitalized or not (so far as I can see). Perhaps asking for that specification in the talk page of the MOS is in order? Peter Deer (talk) 22:48, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK Nomination

Hi. I've nominated Bahá'í Faith in the United Arab Emirates, an article you created, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the hook for the article at Template talk:Did you know#Articles created/expanded on June 8, where you can improve it if you see fit. Thanks. Thingg^⊕^⊗ 03:24, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hehheh. I just saw all your DYK contribs above. If you want to remove the "nom by thingg" from the nom, please feel free. I'm not trying to steal your thunder or anything... Thingg^⊕^⊗ 03:29, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not at all. Glad to have the work affirmed.--Smkolins (talk) 03:41, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

On 12 June, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bahá'í Faith in the United Arab Emirates, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Gatoclass (talk) 18:28, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Cook Islander Bahá'ís

Category:Cook Islander Bahá'ís, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 04:25, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Bahá'í Faith

Thanks For right now, I'm going to wait and see if there is any more activity or signing up for the Project. If you want to add comments to tagged articles, that would probably be handy. Within the next week or so, I'm going to try to get things going. If you have any ideas, please post them on the talk there and be bold editing. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:24, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quality and WikiProjects You're right; there are several well-written articles on the topic on Wikipedia that need updating and cultivation rather than large-scale work. It's pleasantly surprising, actually. As for multiple WikiProjects, a page can certainly "belong" to several at once. There is a code for a banner shell that contains other WikiProject banners on talk pages. See Talk:War, for instance. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:57, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bahá'í Faith in Panama

On 8 July, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bahá'í Faith in Panama, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 15:32, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Bahá'í Faith in New Caledonia

Hi. I've nominated Bahá'í Faith in New Caledonia, an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the hook for the article at Template talk:Did you know#Articles created/expanded on July 28, where you can improve it if you see fit. –Black Falcon ^(Talk) 15:39, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bahá'í Faith in New Caledonia

On 3 August, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bahá'í Faith in New Caledonia, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 14:29, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced paragrpah

There is a whole paragraph in the "Further developments and problems" section regarding the trian in 1961 that is unreferenced. Could you reference that section. Regards, -- Jeff3000 (talk) 16:33, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Got it! :-)Smkolins (talk) 19:50, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Baha'i Faith in LatAm

Thanks for your message on my talk page which I have replied to there. Please let me know what you think. AndrewRT(Talk) 17:35, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Russell Brand

I have reverted your addition to this article, because it appears to be more about Bahai than it is about Russell Brand, per WP:UNDUE. You might want to recast any other additions you make to similar articles to reflect it importance relative to the subject of the article. Thanks. --Rodhull andemu 22:12, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Googoosh signatory

I am a little concerned that Googoosh did not actually sign the petition, as there is no corresponding (and confirming) press release denoting that action. Anyone could sign that petition, and petitions are notoriously unreliable.
I am coming here to your talk page because it would appear that you have added this material to at least one other article (1), and I think it opens the wiki up to a number of reliability issues. Could you self-revert in these other articles until confirming citation can be found? - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 15:46, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Isabella Grinevskaya

On March 31, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Isabella Grinevskaya, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Dravecky (talk) 18:37, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

sorry...

... for my english. I'm using english, french and spanish wikies to edit same bahai voices into the italian. You can see them here & here. Its a long way, but.... :):) Ciao, Giorces —Preceding unsigned comment added by Giorces (talk • contribs) 16:22, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bahai articles

Sorry, the issues of Bahai faith are beyond my sphere of interest. You'd rather ask a person interested in religious issues. --Dmitri Lytov (talk) 16:46, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea

Don't worry I speak english, and yes may be a good idea the translation although honestly the Bahai Faith is not one of my fieds of expertice. But i may find someone more prepare about the subject to hlp in that regard.

Spock —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.40.49.233 (talk) 21:32, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Bahá'í Faith by continent

I see that you created this category and later blanked the page. A faster way to delete a category you've created yourself is to place {{db-author}} on the page. This tag attracts the attention of an administrator who can perform the deletion for you. Contact me if you have questions about this. Best regards, --Stepheng3 (talk) 05:09, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

IN truth I'm not sure what to do about the cat - I put up a note on the discussion area of a related cat. Smkolins (talk) 15:57, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kazakhztan addition

Agreed. I'm not an expert in the field so I was hoping with more knowledge would take it upon themselves to edit out what was unneccessary--Orestek (talk) 18:07, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bahiyyih Khánum

You may want to merge the content you've been developing into Bahiyyih Khánum which has been created by another user. Regards, -- Jeff3000 (talk) 19:52, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Interesting! Smkolins (talk) 21:43, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bahiyyih Page

yes i think that looks brilliant, i attempted to make a start and if i find anymore relevant information ill add it on to the article. i think that you should defenantly merge the article thanks --Lizzie1988 (talk) 12:50, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

thats ok i think we do need to just address a few of the points, very minor ones. thank you for complimenting me on my language very much. i hope this article will be a good one soon. thanks --Lizzie1988 (talk) 14:05, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thats good, good luck with that im sure youll do a great job. when talking about the countries, do you suppose one writes about the history of the establishent of the faith in that paticulair country? or just the statistics of the Bahais in that country? yours, --Lizzie1988 (talk) 17:33, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi yeah it looks really good, ill just add a few very minor edits. I am also quit dubious about the name Fátimih-Sultán as I have never heard this before, it is also not in her biography by Khan or any Persian texts which I have looked at. She was named Bahá'íyyih, it was a name no one had heard of before kind of made up by Navvab and Baha'u'llah. It comes from the word Bahá. Intrestingly she always signed as Bahaiyyih in her private letters. Thanks alot the article looks brilliant --Lizzie1988 (talk) 12:23, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thats very intresting. The Greatest Holy Leaf was twenty-two when she entered the Prison City. At the time 22 would have been very late for a woman not to have been married easpeacily in Persia. Marriagable age was around 15-18 (albeit girls married as young as nine), so prehaps around that age when people were expecting her to marry she renounced the idea of marriage. Prehaps the source is not talking about that specific time when she renounced the idea just stating it as a fact? --Lizzie1988 (talk) 10:58, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you thats very honoroble of you I will do that Ive copied into until the Akka section and you do the rest. Thanks for the help --Lizzie1988 (talk) 00:35, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bahai in Italy

Ciao Smkolins, I pubished Bahai in Italy. It is not a large voice, but i had not many references. I cannot translate it as my english ( from italian to english; it is easier for me from english to italian) is very poor. If you think that it worths to be published in enwiki and you cannot translate in english I could try to translate it in my sandbox, just to give you its meaning, and then you could transalate in good english. I am continuing in translating bahai voices in italian. Ciao, Giorces --giorces (talk) 11:26, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New Templates

Maybe it's time to create a new page, just containing lists of stats in the same way as other countries. Regards, -- Jeff3000 (talk) 22:14, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Bahá'í Faith

Hello! I notice you reverted my recent contributions to the Bahá'í Faith article. I believe that my contribution was new material that was not addressed at all in the section (Laws) that you referenced--nor is the material covered on the page Bahá'í laws. Both the section and that page simply mention that homosexuality or homosexual sex is prohibited...they do not explore the issue of viewing sexual orientation as a "disorder" that is to be "cured"...and the relationship of this to the findings of science and the Bahá'í teachings on the role of science in their religion. I'm certainly open to discussion here and in particular, having the material moved around--I'm not 100% sure of the best place for it myself. But I do not believe that the material duplicates anything currently in the articles. Cazort (talk) 22:46, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your approach - but I think, at best, the material, if it is as you say is new material, belongs on the page dedicated to the topic. The main article has periodically had material added to it until it was very ungainly and thus all the subject pages. Most of the editors watching the page periodically have to shuffle material around along these line. If you are amendable then, I'd say integrate your additions in Homosexuality and the Bahá'í Faith. Smkolins (talk) 22:57, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bahá'í Faith by country

I had put the category back in Bahá'í Faith by country, because I am under the impression that all articles should be categorized somewhere. See also Help:Category. Am I wrong here? You put the category in the "See also" section, which is fine according to me, as it is a helpful link, but it does not categorize the article itself...

Your User:Smkolins/Sandbox3 looks great. Did you check Cameron, G. (1996). A Basic Bahá'í Chronology. Oxford, UK: George Ronald. ISBN 0853984022. {{cite book}}: Check |isbn= value: checksum (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help) Wiki-uk (talk) 11:51, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please note the Bahá'í statistics doesn't have a specific category either. What about putting both articles in a category called Bahá'í statistics, which may have a sub-category Bahá'í Faith by country. Of course it is not only about statistics, it's about history as well. Wiki-uk (talk) 04:33, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please put the question on the relevant talk page then. Wiki-uk (talk) 14:15, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Models of migration to the New World

thank you for fixing up the article Models of migration to the New World i just updated. Buzzzsherman (talk) 16:51, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Yeah sure why not it seems good enough. Thanks for the link btw was very intresting --Lizzie1988 (talk) 18:33, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've just started a small bit of Juliet Thompson, do you think we should try to expand it? --Lizzie1988 (talk) 20:02, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bahá'u'lláh cat.s

Hello I honestly don't know and it's not like the two are mutually exclusive. As far as I'm aware, the "Person from X" categories are basically as broad as possible. If you need to respond, please do so on my talk. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 13:36, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I open my watchlist and see "Smkolins Smkolins Smkolins" everywhere...

	The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
	For diligence, hard work, and dedication in improving articles on the Baha'i Faith, particularly in individual countries, and in relation to other world religions, you have earned this barnstar. Thank you for your tireless efforts! Awarded by: Peter Deer (talk) 18:22, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bahá'í Faith in Vietnam

Let me know if I can help you at all with this one, seeing as I now have a long-term vested interest in Vietnam :) --dragfyre (talk 16:19, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Asiyih Khanum

Can you revert the anonymous's additions to the Asiyih Khanum page, they make no sense. Regards, -- Jeff3000 (talk) 03:20, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Need some more reverts here. Can you keep a watch on the article. Thanks -- Jeff3000 (talk) 14:34, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you think two Khanums are confusing, than someone should put a link on the paragraf about Khanum under Khan. I do not know how to do it, but sometimes when you click on a wikilink it takes you to a certain paragraf on a page, not to the top of the page... Do you know what I mean? Than it wouldn't be confusing because there will be only one Khanum on Wikipeadi. How about that? Is this constructive enough? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.135.242.14 (talk) 16:33, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I do know how to do that but it's an insufficient fix for what you appear to be trying to do. But keep on spinning for constructive approaches. My suggestion is take the Khánum article content to your sandbox, make it better and then repost attracting comments from editors of the Khan page as well as others and they or you fix the confusing mess of articles and redirects *then* it may be appropriate to link to articles that use the word.Smkolins (talk) 16:39, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BTW the term is used in about 500 places in Wikipedia so getting it right would help because if you did to all of them what you did to one ... well let's not go there.Smkolins (talk) 16:41, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually it would be a sufficcient fix for what I wanted to do! I do not think your friends are honest. Even if I made a huge article about Khanum that explains everything with scienfic references, they will find another excuse to cancel it. I told you, all I want is to fix the wrong impression given on that page. Your friend blamed me for being vandal and uncostructive... But in fact they are not constructive either. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.135.242.14 (talk) 16:44, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So... How about a interwiki link for wiktionary page from Khanum? This is the link: http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%D8%AE%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%85#Ottoman_Turkish

It will be just a wikilink. No changes in the phrase... I didn't make that wiktionary link. I found it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.135.242.14 (talk) 17:22, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Whether you made the page or not isn't the issue. The problem with that page is it says too little. For it to be relevant to the article I'd say it would discuss the meaning of the term as used in Persia before the turn of the century or so. Otherwise it's a distraction at best. However you should work at making a good article for the term if it interests you. Thus the idea of a Wikipedia:Sandbox - after you register. Smkolins (talk) 18:12, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The page is just a dictionary, of course it's going to be brief. It doesn't speak about it a lot but provides the necesssary explanation. Whoever put that reference after Khanum, apparently meant to give the meaning... Then here is the dictionary, telling you that is means: `miss` in Persian. After giving the wiktionary link, there is no need to put the reference actually, but I didn't delete it. If giving the dictionary link is irrelevant then giving the reference (which gives me meaning) is irrelevant too; because they both provide the meaning. However the wiktionary provides a better meaning. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.135.242.14 (talk) 18:32, 17 November 2009 (UTC) It's not meaning that is irrelevant (!) - it's meaning out of context. The point is that she had this as part of her name, as people referred to her, and I'm darned certain they didn't mean "miss" by it. So what was the meaning out of 19th century Persia? Modern usage is immaterial to the article as is ancient usage. Smkolins (talk) 18:38, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You act like you are constructive and you make sense; but I honestly think you are reverting changes just out of stubbornness. You are not being honest, nor you are being constructive. I think you guys have some sort of agenda that you are not being honest about.

@@ Line 388: / Line 388: @@
 The page is just a dictionary, of course it's going to be brief. It doesn't speak about it a lot but provides the necesssary explanation. Whoever put that reference after Khanum, apparently meant to give the meaning... Then here is the dictionary, telling you that is means: `miss` in Persian. After giving the wiktionary link, there is no need to put the reference actually, but I didn't delete it. If giving the dictionary link is irrelevant then giving the reference (which gives me meaning) is irrelevant too; because they both provide the meaning. However the wiktionary provides a better meaning.  <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/198.135.242.14|198.135.242.14]] ([[User talk:198.135.242.14|talk]]) 18:32, 17 November 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 It's not meaning that is irrelevant (!) - it's meaning out of context. The point is that she had this as part of her name, as people referred to her, and I'm darned certain they didn't mean "miss" by it. So what was the meaning out of 19th century Persia? Modern usage is immaterial to the article as is ancient usage. [[User:Smkolins|Smkolins]] ([[User talk:Smkolins#top|talk]]) 18:38, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
+You act like you are constructive and you make sense; but I honestly think you are reverting changes just out of stubbornness. You are not being honest, nor you are being constructive. I think you guys have some sort of agenda that you are not being honest about.