Jump to content

User talk:Morenooso: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→Articles by User:MAGPIETRAP: Thnx fer your quick response
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:

What? Did he cry?

{{User:Bubba hotep‎/Busy|root for=US}}
{{User:Bubba hotep‎/Busy|root for=US}}
{{skiptotoc}}
{{skiptotoc}}

Revision as of 03:13, 6 July 2010

What? Did he cry?

Today is Sunday, November 17, 2024; it is now 02:30 (UTC/GMT )

moreno oso's categories
moreno oso's categories


Our hero, the California grizzly bear aka Brownbear.

  • Welcome
Hello, Morenooso! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! --moreno oso (talk)
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Talk

Hello, Morenooso. You have new messages at Burpelson AFB's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Bear type necessities

  1. - Get dribble vest.
  2. - Feed da bear.
  3. - No se pica el oso.
  4. - Don't scratch eyes or other *ahem* things with Ben Gay on your paws.

Re: article expansion

Extended content

I added a few more statements to the Manuel Lara Rodríguez article. Will add more, but not this evening. I have 100s of pages on my watchlist that I haven't visited yet today. SamEV (talk) 02:05, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The clock starts to tick today from your first edit towards expansion. The article's size 820 B and about 139 words. Conservatively, another 140 words should be the 5x expansion. ----moreno oso (talk) 02:14, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1002 B. Needs another 600 B. ----moreno oso (talk) 03:02, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
'k. I will try to finish it by this evening. SamEV (talk) 16:46, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
He hid out for 30 days which is cited in one of the articles. According to the other mayor, Lara did not request protection and was living in the second mayor's town unbeknownst to him. ----moreno oso (talk) 16:59, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm done. I may have unintentionally shuffled a few sources in my reorganization of the article, but it's late, and I just want to have a look at my watchlist and call it a night. So if you're so inclined, please check the article to make sure everything's in order. I doubt very much that I'll be doing any more work on it. Good luck with the nomination. SamEV (talk) 05:55, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I just saw it. Good job. I'm going to do the nom now so the article can get reviewed. Most likely nothing will be done on it for at least two days. I've had a wild night myself and probably will be off to bed in 30 minutes. ----moreno oso (talk) 06:02, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I know who Manuel Valdées is. And it should definitely be a lot easier to expand his article than Lara's.
But I never intended to become a DYK contributor. In the case of the Monsiváis article, I was just trying to help you. In the Lara case, I was trying to earn the credit you'd shared with me for the Monsiváis improvement. So, unfortunately, I'll have to decline. I'm not even sure I'll be able to keep up, the rest of the summer, with the articles I already edit regularly, due to time concerns. Good luck, and see you around.
P.S. Lara is a PRI guy, Calderón is a PAN guy. :) SamEV (talk) 22:56, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Glad to hear it on the Valdés article. Most people think he is the greatest thing around but he doesn't do too much for me. Still can't believe he was married to Veronica Castro. The DYK userbox is up to you. Personally, I like seeing it when I visit other userpages. In a recent Page Patrol, I recognized another editor who regularly contributes to Wikipedia. He had a developing article CSD'd. I declined and vouched for him. The CSD editor nominated it as AfD despite advice on the article talkpage not to. It took two days for the AfD to close as a Keep plus the creator and I shared a DYK. BTW, I have 3200 articles under watch although a third are likely deleted CSDs and blocked users. I keep CSD'd articles around because almost invariably they will spring up again. ----moreno oso (talk) 23:06, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
BTW, let me know when you begin expansion. ----moreno oso (talk) 23:18, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No, oso. I'm declining the invitation to help expand the Valdés article. I'm just going to focus on the articles I usually edit, some of which I've been neglecting for months.
And, um, yeah, I was shocked to learn that "El Loco" landed Veronica Castro. She's gorgeous, even if she's old enough to be my mother! SamEV (talk) 23:23, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Just checked on Lara. He hasn't been placed in a queue yet which surprises me. If you look further down my talkpage, there was some discussion about the Mexican governatorial candidate who was killed. I just read a Yahoo article that should be on the AP soon that links everything I said about this being the cartels' way of silencing opposition candidates who disagree with them. Doesn't matter which party as bullets are indiscriminate. ----moreno oso (talk) 23:30, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to hear about Valdes. Maybe I'll work on him tonight. Veronica looks like she's had one too many surgeries lately. HDTV really shows the amount of makeup some of these stars need. She kind of reminds me of Liz Taylor at a similar age. Hope she doesn't go the same route. ----moreno oso (talk) 23:30, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, that's too bad. I haven't seen her in years, I must say.
It's possible I'll still help a little bit on the Valdés article (in fact, I made a minor copyedit several minutes ago), but I'd rather not commit beforehand. SamEV (talk) 23:38, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ARG 3 - MEX 1

Let the shoot-out begin. ----moreno oso (talk) 18:02, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ack -- didn't want to see Perez down there with the ball slipping away ... Antandrus (talk) 18:56, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

1 - zip. What is it with these goalies over=committing and so far out from the goal. Stupidity. ----moreno oso (talk) 19:01, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Univision announcers just ripped him a new one!! ----moreno oso (talk) 19:02, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2 to 0. Again he came out too aggressive on his knees. ----moreno oso (talk) 19:03, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Al Medio tiempo. I wonder what bear type snacks I pilferred? ----moreno oso (talk) 19:19, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
3 to 0. I bet the goalie saw it this time on instant replay. ----moreno oso (talk) 19:41, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It's my fault -- it's because I'm watching -- everyone I root for crashes and burns this year. At least that one wasn't on a bad call. Antandrus (talk) 19:43, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's mine too. My luck is terrible and I should have been cheering for Argentina. The first two scores were all goalie. The third maybe was a great shot. However, I wonder what Maribel Guardia is doing? ----moreno oso (talk) 19:51, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
3 to 1. Maribel or the game? ----moreno oso (talk) 20:02, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I wonder if I put my head under honey??? Nah. . .----moreno oso (talk) 20:23, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Wonder if it would have turned out differently if Mexico hadn't suffered that first bad-call goal. Has to be demoralizing. -- Germany-Argentina will be interesting next weekend ... Antandrus (talk) 20:24, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I kind of doubt it. Argentina looked all the way like a better team and it looked like the Mexican goalie's head was somewhere else. I could have played goalie and blocked at least one of those shots. ----moreno oso (talk) 20:29, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bret Himmelman

He gets ghits which is why I tagged it. Could you restore and if necessary BLP PROD it? ----moreno oso (talk) 23:58, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In its last state it had no assertion of notability. The content is so sparce that restoring it seems a bit pointless. Perhaps it will be recreated with an assertion of notability and some refs. If I restored it, it wouldn't get a BLP prod, it would end up with a CSD#A7. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 00:03, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Lots of stubs are like that. To delete it within its first 10 minutes or so existence seems contra WP:BEFORE. ----moreno oso (talk) 00:06, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Let's see how it goes. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 00:08, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Wonder if I should ask for a reference on this one? Goes to show that I would have let the PROD stand on another article listed below! ----moreno oso (talk) 05:29, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like he is a teen-ager. Probably should have been deleted. ----moreno oso (talk) 01:05, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Marie Osmond at the day time thingie last night

Grr, maybe this bear ought to jump back in the cold bath. GRRRR!!!

Re: David Mccaskill Elliott

I had declined the A7 and was in the midst of article immprovement. Please restore the file. The In use template was displayed. ----moreno oso (talk) 02:56, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I will restore it, but for future reference, the proper template to put a CSD on hold is {{hangon}}, not inuse. - TexasAndroid (talk) 02:59, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Negative, and you know it. Anyone can decline a Speedy. ----moreno oso (talk) 03:01, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You forgot the talkpage. I don't need to recreate work. ----moreno oso (talk) 03:05, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You are misreading what I said. I was talking about what template you should use to put a speedy on hold, not whether or not you could do it. That said, I am rather underwhelmed by your improvements. Facebook is far from what I would consider a reliable source, and I still do not see anything that rises to notability. I'll be filing an AFD on this one sometime tomorrow if there if notability is not shown. - TexasAndroid (talk) 03:57, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
BTW, the mention of an AFD is not good in light of your action. Recommend you rethink that one. ----moreno oso (talk) 04:14, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Negative again. And, I'm overwhelmed by your deletion with no CSD tag in place. ----moreno oso (talk) 04:11, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A note should this go to AfD

In this DIFF, I performed all the actions indicated. I did not introduce the facebook link. The admin, who deleted this article without a CSD tag present, on his talkpage stated in on its thisDIFF threatened to take it to an AfD. ----moreno oso (talk) 04:23, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Un ef'ing believable (and, I don't like to swear)!!! ----moreno oso (talk) 05:27, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jesús Manuel Lara Rodríguez

FYI, I've approved that DYK nom, but I couldn't verify the first alt hook, which seemed to contradict the other two. Anys isgn of an article on the guy who was killed yesterday/today/whatever it is? Btw, I fixed a grammatical error in your editnotice! It's a pet hate of mine! ;) HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 07:57, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Are you talking about the singer who was run off the road? If so, yes. It's in the recent death notices on the front page. Univision has been running segments on him because he gave an interview recently (probably just prior to Father's Day because he spoke happily about his family. Supposedly he was at a gig with his body guards; got into some kind of dust-up and then bullets and car bashing ensued. He lost and they showed him zipped up in a body bag. Wikipedia could almost do a template or series on this as the Yahoo links I put on Lara's talkpage addressed another murder with 8 people killed. In fact, Lara's friend (the other mayor) said his police department has been decimated because of desertions due to killings. ----moreno oso (talk) 08:06, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The sad thing is that Lara may have felt with a couple of weeks to go to the election, his family and he were safe. There has been a swath of killings within the week and the drug cartels seem to be targetting the PRI to send Calderon a message. ----moreno oso (talk) 08:30, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PAR 5 - JPN 3

Mano a mano. Shooter versus goalie. ----moreno oso (talk) 16:38, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  1. 3 to 2. ----moreno oso (talk) 16:40, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  2. 4 to 2. Game changer.
  3. 4 to 3. Errr. ----moreno oso (talk) 16:41, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, they have a Japanese guy speaking Spanish on Despierta America. Renaisance man!! Ana Maria WP:HOTTIE in baby blue. ----moreno oso (talk) 16:59, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Spain 1 - Portugal 0

Should be a good one. ----moreno oso (talk) 18:27, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  1. 0 0
  2. 1 - 0
  3. Fini. ----moreno oso (talk) 20:23, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free files in your user space

Hey there Morenooso, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Morenooso/Fish Smarty. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

  • See a log of files removed today here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:01, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Aw man, I feel like such a vandal!!! ----moreno oso (talk) 05:05, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ITN for Rodolfo Torre Cantú

--HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 05:08, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cool! ----moreno oso (talk) 05:14, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
First ITN? Userbox: {{User ITN|1}} HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 05:34, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yup!!! You da man! ----moreno oso (talk) 05:37, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sergio Vega (singer)

This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

Hi! Sergio Vega (singer) popped up on the review screen today. You have two edits, once which seemed good and the other questionable, where you changed 'mum' to 'mom'.

I hated to revert, but were you Americanizing the quote or was 'mom' his actual quote?

best regards, --UnicornTapestry (talk) 17:35, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If I changed mum to mom, it was unintentional. I was trying to get at something else that was dubious. But, if this individual spoke, it was in Spanish and Mexicans don't use Mum. ----moreno oso (talk) 17:38, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Just caught your note. The edits on the review screen show up as a single edit unless we break them out. Sorry to put you to the extra work for one questionable edit.
--UnicornTapestry (talk) 17:41, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Then, maybe, just maybe you shouldn't have done that. I speak Spanish and have been on this article since his death. ----moreno oso (talk) 17:49, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tridentine Mass

Hello. I was wondering why you are so opposed to having a note warning people that a link is a large pdf file on the Tridentine Mass article. I made this alteration after clicking the link without realising how large the file was and felt it would be helpful to warn other people. This is common practice on the internet, never mind your citation of wikipedian case law. Though having brought that up, I am not sure why WP:OTHERSTUFF is relevant -- that appears to be about *the existence* of *whole articles, templates, etc*, not annotations to hyperlinks. The only justification you give for reverting it is that it is "commentary", in which case I would ask why you also do not remove everything else in that section that is so clearly commenting on links -- I refer to dates, clarification that editions are "typical", information about the languages the texts are written in, which redactions were performed on the texts and who ordered them, locations of publication etc.

I am also not sure why you thought solely my edit was worth reverting in light of the fact that somebody else had done this on another file further down the page. Is there case law for that, I wonder? - Pthag (talk) 02:06, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

First, since you posted the original item, it was not good for you to revert. But, let's dismiss that pecadillo. You might to look at how to build your links. There is an accepted symbol that will tell users there is a PDF download involved. Now, for "case law" as you put it which is a terrible to put it. Please see {{subst:uw-cia1}} It's a warning for placing chat in an article. Granted, your is not the traditional chat or commentary but it is contra WP:MOS to have "extra stuff" as per your post. ----moreno oso (talk) 02:13, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The pdf symbol was already there. I did not remove it. I added text that provides information that the symbol does not -- namely that this is a *large* pdf.
Please tell me what is against the Manual of Style in the "chat" I added. I see nothing relevant.
I remind you that a "chat" similar to the one I added has existed in the page for a while. In your second revert you reverted my change to that second caution, but did not remove the whole reference. I also remind you that that section is full of "commentary" much graver than the one I added. Would you delete it all, please? - Pthag (talk) 02:23, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Let's not get into WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS again. And, I don't have to cleanup the page if I'm Patrolling. ----moreno oso (talk) 02:27, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop citing that page -- it is irrelevant to the matter at hand -- and answer my questions. I would like to know how what I wrote contravenes the Manual of Style. I would like to know why you oppose a note warning readers as to the size of the file. I would like to know why my addition was "chat", but none of the other annotations are. If you cannot answer these questions, I really see no reason why you should revert my edit which, as you admitted, is entirely in good faith. - Pthag (talk) 02:32, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please see WP:OWN because you're trying to preserve an edit. Give it a rest and move on. ----moreno oso (talk) 02:35, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Forgive me, I did not mean to establish any proprietary claim. I have remained quite civil throughout this discussion and have only asked you to back up your justifications. Since you have not, can we agree that consensus has been reached and my original edit can stand? If you disagree, then please feel free to explain reasons why it should not; for example, how my edit is against the Wikipedia Manual of Style, why readers should not be warned about large files and (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS notwithstanding, since it does not claim to refer to this sort of thing, but as I said, about whether or not whole articles should exist) why my addition does not fit into the existing links section of the page, given that it is richly annotated and even already included an annotation similar to the one I added. - Pthag (talk) 02:46, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Consensus? Let me see if I can explain it to you in one word. ----moreno oso (talk) 02:48, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm afraid I don't understand. Are we in agreement or not? -Pthag (talk) 02:53, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No. And, this is my final. You really need to move along. ----moreno oso (talk) 02:55, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand why. It is just, of course I would prefer to re-revert the article back to include my edit, but out of respect I have come to you to explain my case. I have remained polite to you throughout this conversation, and have only asked you what fault you saw in my edit in the hope that we could come to a mutually-satisfactory agreement. I have put forward my case that I think my edit will benefit readers of the article who, like me, prefer a warning that a certain hyperlink leads to a large file which may inconvenience them. Somebody else thought similarly. Naturally, since you reverted it, you may well have equally good reasons for not wanting my edit to remain and I have asked, and am still asking you, to please share them with me. You have pointed to places where a case contra may be made, but I am afraid I don't see where. Once again, I would please ask you to tell me why my case is faulty. If you do not, then I cannot see how the situation can be anything other than that the case behind my original edit is sound. Of course, if you can see any additional reasons, please do not hesitate to mention them. I cannot, however, agree that the case has been solved since we still appear to be in (non-violent!) disagreement. -Pthag (talk) 03:05, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Don't I wish...

There were some great places up that way, but I don't recall having been there. I was a South Bay baby.  :) On the other hand, I vividly remember family celebrations at Little Joe's. Best ravioli I had ever eaten in a restaurant and believe me, I was a little kid when I was there last. I still remember the food. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 03:06, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There's another one I was looking that I am pretty certain an article exists: Felipe's French Dip. It's across from the old downtown depot and stars used to hang out there. Alas the Brown Derby is gone. I could also go for Paul's Duck Press near the downtown florist merchant stalls. Best duck ala orange ever!!! ----moreno oso (talk) 03:10, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, now I have been there. A must when downtown and you can walk to Olvera Street. Another must is The Pantry on Figueroa and Ninth. Clifton's Cafeteria is still around, but I forgot which street it was on. Re. the Spanish Kitchen: I actually saw the inside for myself back around 1985 or so after reading about it in the Times. It was eerie beyond belief. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 03:19, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Funny you should mention The Pantry. My Dad used to take the family there on Sundays because of their family pricing. My Brother still loves the place. In fact, about two years ago on his birthday, we hit El Tepeyac, Phillipe's, The Pantry and Clifton's. He loves Clifton's and just about lives there. In fact, the waitresses at The Pantry know him and his standard order/section. The guy's a bigger mooch (stomach) than me. ----moreno oso (talk) 03:24, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Gerard Colton

thanks for catching it. I not only deleted, but protected against re-creation. DGG ( talk ) 03:31, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. You know, I wonder: do these editors really think they can pull the wool over our eyes? I'm not feeling too great but to see that article pop up new in my Watchlist was like, "Duh!" ----moreno oso (talk) 03:36, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Jesús Manuel Lara Rodríguez

— Rlevse • Talk • 00:02, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Holland 2 - Brasil 1

Let's see if Kaká is up for the Mundial!!!----moreno oso (talk) 13:50, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  1. 7 minute mark - offside. Good catch by Japanese ref who clearly blew his whistle. ----moreno oso (talk) 14:10, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  2. 9:27 - Now, that was a goal!!!
  1. 8:20 - Gol.
  2. 22:15 - Gol. Knew this one was going to be a good match. Wonder if Brasil just met its buzzsaw?
  3. 43:18 - This Japanese refs are great! They should do the next round!!!
  4. 44:20 - Brasil looks frustrated.
  5. 48:01 - ¡Se acabo!

Uruguay 1 - Ghana 1

  1. Just came in; Uruguay dodged two bullets.

Penalty Kicks

  1. Uru 1 1 1 0 1
  2. Gha 1 1 0 0

Pregunta

¿Cuántos artículos le tienen creó? – B.hotep •talk• 21:57, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Salvador Cristau Coll

— Rlevse • Talk • 00:04, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SR-71 crash

G'day from Oz. I have just returned the SR-71 crash article to a redirect only - it was merged to the SR-71 article not so long ago but someone undid the merge today. Feel free to keep an eye on it via your watchlist. YSSYguy (talk) 05:47, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. ----moreno oso (talk) 05:50, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Argentina 0 - Germany 1

  1. For all the marbles ----moreno oso (talk) 14:00, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Arg 0 - Ger 1 - at 2:49 First buzzsaw scores
  3. Arg 0 - Ger 1 - Wow, yellow card and Germany loses a striker at the 35 minute mark
  4. Arg 0 - Ger 1 - Offsides. Too many Argentians over da line. . .
  5. Arg 0 - Ger 1 - al medio tiempo

WTF (I hate to swear) but can anyone tell me what the In use template means?

I'm no sailor but I could swear a blue streak right now and that's not me. If the In use Template means nothing, it ought to be deleted because an article, Batman film (2012), that I had the template on got deleted after I introduced reliably sourced citations that confirmed the script and the interview the director Christopher Nolan gave first to the Los Angeles Times (with a citation) and then his June 28, 2010 interview with Empire magazine. ----moreno oso (talk) 06:00, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A beautiful end to a beautiful day - NOT!!! ----moreno oso (talk) 06:10, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Incubator my a@$!!! ----moreno oso (talk) 06:11, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Once again, the WTF In use template means nothing; I lost work that I put into the article due to the ultimate edit conflict and I don't have squat to show for my efforts. Good to know to that I mean so much at WP:OLD. Batman 3, which seems to be the working title, can use the Batphone to get another superhero to save this crappy article. ----moreno oso (talk) 06:26, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks

Many thanks for helping out with the editing with the article about Bishop Claver. I hope you are doing well.-RFD (talk) 13:59, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Eh?

I didn't make an attack on IronGargoyle -- what are you on about? 92.239.138.114 (talk) 14:44, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your attack is archived in this DIFF. Calling an editor a "spaz" is not good practice especially after you were issued a warning. Suggest you get over this and resolve to be a contributing member. ----moreno oso (talk) 14:56, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're actually WATCHING the World Cup?

I tried. Like watching paint dry. Could never really get into soccer...

Anyway, great story regarding the lost wallet. As far as that place in Manhattan Beach is concerned, no, I don't remember it...but I do remember The Kettle. One of the greatest little coffee shops I've ever been to. My mom, wife and sister-in-law all worked for an insurance agency at one time and they all used to meet there for lunch. I'd join them every chance I'd get. Other late greats I remember are Nancy's in Inglewood on Arbor Vitae west of La Cienega. Without question, the best home cooking I'd ever found in LA. The parking lot was crammed with police, fire and LAX vehicles any time of day. Another was Pasgetti's. This was a little place in Inglewood at Aviation and Century right up against the Harbor Subdivision tracks. The menu was pasta, nothing more except garlic bread. Your choice of sauces and the alfredo sauce was too good to be true. Dirt cheap and absolutely wonderful. A work buddy once took me to Murray's soul food restaurant in South Central on 74th and Broadway. Only went there once; the place was so clean you could eat off of the floor and I still talk about the food twenty years later. There was Two Guys from Italy on PCH west of Crenshaw in Torrance; the homemade gnocchi a la panna in a prosciutto cream sauce were to die for. Also in Torrance, King's Hawaiian on Sepulveda at Hickory west of Crenshaw is still there; you have got to try the Kings Hawaiian bread French toast with coconut syrup if you're out that way. Ah, memories.  :)--PMDrive1061 (talk) 17:32, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I am although I had to take a break yesterday due to an emergency.
As for the lost wallet, man that was a joy ride that went sour when the idiot realized what he had done. We left Sacramento around 10 pm and basic drove non-stop to Tommy's. Couple of beers there, chili-burgers, etc and we realized we had to get home before we were missed. Had it not been for his military ID and credit cards, we would have told him to forget going back. That added two hours more to the round-trip.
I remember Pasgetti's because I always felt like a kid eating there. One of my friends liked Nancy's but with a Bob's Big Boy not to far from us and that sub shop next store, it was hard to justify leaving Westchester and Playa Del Rey. I used to love Charley Brown's down in the Marina and used to score on female stewardesses left and right. One of my roommates introduced me to martinis there and claimed they made us look more sophisticated. It helped that we hung with this guy who was 42 and about 20 years older than us. He would lay the trench for us with the women. . . ----moreno oso (talk) 17:47, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

HootSuite

Hi Morenooso. I've declined your speedy of HootSuite. There seems to be quite a few reliable sources available:[1]. Regards, Theleftorium (talk) 21:11, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles by User:MAGPIETRAP

Hello, Morenooso … Please take a look at this entry I left on another user's talk page listing some articles created by MAGPIETRAP (talk · contribs) … I noticed that you had flagged one of them as WP:COI, so I thought that I should ping you. :-)

Happy Editing! — 70.21.13.215 (talk · contribs) 05:55, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I just saw some stuff by that user on Recent changes. Looks like the author has been busy. I just requested a WP:CSD on one article and will review the link you left here. ----moreno oso (talk) 05:59, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Geez, I can't believe how many spam links this editor left. There were some off-the-wall edits to places where he visited, owned a home, his family lived - the list is almost endless. I think I got the majority of its edits with some other regular edits reverting dubious edits to their watched articles. My wrists and fingers are killing me. ----moreno oso (talk) 06:38, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This DIFF slays me. How do you tag a subway station with your name? ----moreno oso (talk) 06:58, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thnx fer your quick response … two have been deleted, and the remaining two have been PRODed. — 70.21.13.215 (talk) 03:03, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Shakira

This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

Shakira is not considered a Colombian American, for the reasons stated by the anonymous contributor. Born in Colombia, living in Bahamas. Salut, --IANVS (talk | cont) 13:50, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Try reading her article. BTW, I suggest you watch your edit summaries. ----moreno oso (talk) 13:55, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Colombian is not Hispanic and Latino American but Latin American. Didn't you know? --IANVS (talk | cont) 13:57, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
What "error introduction" are you talking about? Be more specific, please, instead of "warning". --IANVS (talk | cont) 14:00, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It's similar to the formal 3RR warning you received. Suggest you revert and reinsert Shakira NOW. ----moreno oso (talk) 14:04, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please, calm down and re-read the article. Hispanic and Latino Americans are United States Americans by birth or nationalization. Latin Americans are not necessarily United States Americans. Can you see? --IANVS (talk | cont) 14:06, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
There has been discussion in the past that the article is not a global view. I see that you are still a relatively new editor, since November 2009. You don't need to cite policy to me because I can cite it to you if that is desired. ----moreno oso (talk) 14:27, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm lecturing nobody. Please, be civil. Can you tell me what are you meaning with "global view", please? Salut, --IANVS (talk | cont) 14:29, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stay off my talkpage. ----moreno oso (talk) 15:12, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bosco

I have been too busy these last weeks and now I find that somebody removed the entire section of historical context. I feel really tired. Now it's night here, so I go to sleep and tomorrow morning I will review it again :( Good day over there :) --Albeiror24 - English - Español - Italiano - ខ្មែរ 15:24, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I read what you posted and sense your pain. Have a good night and when you're ready, do what you say here. I did not want to post on the talkpage til I had a chance to see what you are/were thinking. I will look over the article right now. ----moreno oso (talk) 15:29, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe I am missing it but it appears an editor added flowery stuff to the article since User:Happysailor's revert. I would recommend a revert back to that editor. ----moreno oso (talk) 15:47, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Morenooso&oldid=371961619"