Jump to content

Talk:Need for Speed: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by 198.151.130.21 - ""
Line 381: Line 381:
== Citation ==
== Citation ==
Where is the citation for this? "Due to law enforcement reasons, there were no cops in Underground and Underground 2, which drew criticism as cops were an important part of previous titles' gameplay. The game received good reviews which generally criticised cops not being in the game." <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/198.151.130.21|198.151.130.21]] ([[User talk:198.151.130.21|talk]]) 19:09, 16 December 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Where is the citation for this? "Due to law enforcement reasons, there were no cops in Underground and Underground 2, which drew criticism as cops were an important part of previous titles' gameplay. The game received good reviews which generally criticised cops not being in the game." <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/198.151.130.21|198.151.130.21]] ([[User talk:198.151.130.21|talk]]) 19:09, 16 December 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Need For Speed Underground ==

Should there not be a summery of NFS:Underground between hot pursuit 2 and underground 2?

Revision as of 20:31, 16 June 2011

Former featured article candidateNeed for Speed is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the archive.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 3, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted
WikiProject iconVideo games C‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Custom Hot Pursuit 2 cars

In the Hot Pursuit 2 section it says this: "Also, the additional downloads of cars from the web were quite hard to find." I wasn't even aware that any official ones existed? And can't find them for that matter.

Hey man, I don't think there are any, and I have the game.

Nintendo NFSs and Motor City Online

Are there Nintendo versions of Need for Speed?

I believe yes

Yes, Underground (GC/DS/GBA),Underground 2,most wanted,carbon.

Also, this page is horribly written; it's also not including NFS: MCO.

First this article says that Hot Pursuit II did relatively well in the marketplace. Then it says it was a flop. Which is it? Babomb 05:24, 9 Nov 2004 (UTC)

What is NFS:MCO? If you know something about it, write something.--U.U. 19:07, Dec 7, 2004 (UTC)

Press Release from EAGames, September 16th, 2000, re: NfS:MCO

Greetings Motor City and Need For Speed fans,

It has been entirely too long since you've last heard from us, and we deeply apologize for that.
Motor City has gone through a lot of modification, and we just wanted to make sure the facts about
the game were nailed down before we passed them on to you. This has finally been achieved, so we're
pleased to share some exciting information with you.

Motor City is an online-only game, renamed Motor City Online (MCO). We know there's been a lot of
debate about this decision. We also know that there were issues in the online space with NFS 4 & 5.
But we are striving to break new territory with our games and reach PC racers and car enthusiasts to
an extent that we've never been able to before. We have been challenged to create a great online
racing and community experience and we acknowledge that online represents a vast future for gaming.
Launching MCO early next year on Electronic Arts' new online gaming network (EA.com) will allow us
to take major steps in this direction - and that prospect is really exciting to us. We hope that
you will share our excitement and take MCO for a free test drive later this fall and assess the
experience for yourself.

Taking the experience well beyond a single player game, Motor City Online is designed to be a
bustling, gear-head haven which blends the line between game play and community; between the gaming
experience and involvement of your friends. The game features cool hot-rodder hangouts for your
online persona, near limitless car customization, sanctioned racing, street racing and arcade style
driving.

Here are some additional details about the current direction of the game:

* Several single-player online play options
* Loads of online competitions, contests, and great prizes
* Amazing cars, deep car customization and beautiful racing worlds, plus a new section of arcade game play features
* The ability to create your own online personas and build up their cash inventory and reputations in the MCO world
* Run car clubs, fix up old cars, sell their custom paint jobs, and much more!
* Tear up the streets in pro races, street challenges, and arcade driving events
* The game will track your cash, cars, racing history, and very importantly, your reputation
* Trick out your cars choosing from thousands of authentic styling and performance parts
* Customize your personas, their garage, the appearance of their cars, and their club insignias
* Trade cars and parts with other players and swap items for Motor City money 

We are hard at work on the final touches of a fully featured Motor City Online web site, that will
let you stay informed about the evolution of the game, and allow you to provide us with valuable
feedback as we approach the launch of the game. As soon as this site is available for viewing we
will contact you.

As the game continues to evolve, and the time is right, we hope that you will be interested in
getting involved first-hand. It is obvious to us that you will play a major role in making Motor
City an online success. Also, keep an eye out for more information about the upcoming launch of
EA.com, as well as changes coming to the beta racing service, EA Racing.

Sincerely,

- The EA Racing Team

--appearently posted by Kar98 03:47, Jan 27, 2005 (UTC)

Oh. Well, then someone, who knows more about MCO should write about it.--U.U. 14:07, Jan 27, 2005 (UTC)

  • Not me though. I just googled it ;-)Kar98 19:15, Jan 29, 2005 (UTC)

i dont know much about it eather but there is already a small wikipedia page for it so a link to it sould be incloded on this page. but i dont know how to so hopefully someone else can do it.Chardrc 23:14, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Shortcuts

I believe that last rv was false. Tracks had shortcuts already in NFS III --U.U. 06:47, May 10, 2005 (UTC)

I have to disagree. Shortcuts and more open-ended tracks were already available from as early as NFS 2. There are at least three tracks there that I know having shortcuts, plus it is possible to drive off-road in certains areas. ╫ 25 ring-a-ding 12:17, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
No, it's true in NFS 2 there are different routes, and some off road, but they are part of the track, not a short cut. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 164.116.40.13 (talkcontribs)
Speaking as a person how has played the game for a long time, I'm not convinced that mere patches of grass (in North Country and Monolithic Studios) or a parking lot (in Pacific Spirit) that cut sharp corners are considered part of the actual track and not shortcuts in the game. Besides, no computer opponent has ever been seen using these routes, so it's obvious that the shortcuts are not utilized by opponents and are assumed to be something that the player can take advantage of. ╫ 25 ◀RingADing▶ 18:09, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have NFS2, and I didn't think there were any shortcuts. The Parking Lot in Pacific spirit doesn't go anywhere.

Screenshot

  • It would be great to get at least one screen shot in this article. Gbeeker 21:47, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Would it be a copyright violation if I put a screenshot here?

Use {{game-screenshot}} -- Thorpe talk 16:14, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Most Wanted pc demo

dont know if this is relevant but a pc demo for nfsmw came out yesterday 10-10-05. The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chardrc (talk • contribs) .

V-Rally?

The article apparently missed mentioning the Need for Speed: V-Rally rallying series. From what I've read, the series only spawned two titles - one in 1997 and its sequel in 1999 (see also NFS game list. Would appreciate it if someone mentions at least a few line about the games. ╫ 25 ◀RingADing▶ 19:50, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect

"The game is also the first in the series to lack a in-car cockpit view." was removed from NFS:HP2 subheading because it is erroneous. NFS:SE offered in-car cockpit view. Daza.info

The passage refers that HP2 was the first NFS game to remove the interior view (unless you were implying that the first NFS game doesn't have this view, which would justify your edit). The passage has been returned for the sake of clarity. ╫ 25 ◀RingADing▶ 17:02, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Just to correct myself, claiming only NFS:SE has cockpit view is erroneous altogether. Pretty much all NFS games before Hot Pursuit 2 (I'm still not sure about the V-Rally series) had a cockpit view for all real-life models, be it photo renderings or 3D models (which was first used in High Stakes). ╫ 25 ◀RingADing▶ 17:02, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Changes

Y'know, I would suggest the following things:

  • Make articles for every Need for Speed game (if it doesn't have one already, such as Most Wanted)
  • Have this page be moved to Need for Speed series, and have brief mentions of each game in the series, with links to each game.

I'm not particularly fond of articles that cover every game in a particular series instead of having seperate articles for each, because then articles can get unnecessarily long (such as the Hitman series, which each game didn't have seperate articles until recently, and the Syphon Filter series page, which has really overdetailed info on the storyline of each game, with Dark Mirror being the only game in the series with its own article.) it would just look better. Your thoughts? -TonicBH 23:16, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]


"From 1994—2002, the games did not feature traffic, however, starting with Underground, traffic is a feature that has been included in the series and is an obstacle added during a race" needs to be removed. Need for speed 2 featured traffic, as well as NFS3 and NFS4 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.227.183.75 (talk) 21:30, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NFSSE rock music

What band played the rock songs on Need for Speed SE?

Cover cars section

This section is just too crufty for mention and has little encyclopedic value, besides simply describing the box arts' cars and little nitpicks. I'm tempted to have this removed, especially when MobyGames is already providing most of the needed illustrations of the series' box arts. ╫ 25 ◀RingADing▶ 09:50, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Although I added to this section I also had my doubts. I was thinking more of creating a new article but as you say it has "little encyclopedic value" Pretender2j 11:58, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The section has been removed. Feel free to drop a comment here if there are any objections. ╫ 25 ◀RingADing▶ 12:57, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality of Need for Speed series criticism

I noticed that a user has included a completely new section containing discussion on the Need for Speed series' criticism. While additions and changes that improve a article's topic are welcomed, there is an importance in providing sources to verify that any new information originated from a notable publication or website, thus confirming that the addition isn't of original research or non-neutral point of view.

In this article's case, citations are needed for discussions pertaining to the series being primarily arcade-like, but combining simulation elements, confusing gamers and "luring" them into driving dangerously (even the section this passage points to refers to only one cited case). It would be appreciated if the section is provided with any notable citations; otherwise, the section will be removed, citing to original research and POV writing. In the mean time, an {{npov}} tag has also been included in the article. ╫ 25 ◀RingADing▶ 17:49, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, I just read the section that you are refering to, somebody has a chip on their shoulder! It really is just saying 'NFS is crap and you should play...' I'm removing the last sentence. Sure you can make criticisms of something but then to suggest an alternative is way outside what should be in an encyclopedia. The whole thing is really bordering on advice. Pretender2j 01:09, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

(Seeing GuardianOfTruth had managed to post a new reply ahead of me, I'll just like to note that the following reply concerns sourcing claims in the article and isn't an actual response to the new reply. A second reply in response to his/her new message may be provided.)
I've just taken a look at the links GuardianOfTruth has provided. Sadly, they don't look adequate enough to have the {{npov}} tag removed. There are particular issues that I have to note:
  • While each of the reviews do have a perception that the series is arcade-like, most of the links focus on NFS games produced by EA Black Box (2002 and later) (The contracted developer assigned to develop the series was changed from the original EA Canada to EA Black Box (which is a new division of EA Canada) before Hot Pursuit 2, hence the significant shift of gameplay style). As such, the selection of links primarily reflects those of HP2 and later, and doesn't reference the first NFS (not the PC-only Special Edition), NFS III: Hot Pursuit, NFS: High Stakes, Motor City Online, as well as the early NFS: V-Rally series (developed by Eden Studios). Of course, there are three references on the contrary; two are used to note exceptions in the series (GameSpot's Porsche Unleashed review is perfect; however, the other is not reliable - see below), but NFS II is actually a more arcade example of the pre-Black Box series, and doesn't completely reflect the nature of the early series.
  • One review on NFS:SE is in a fan site, which is not a reliable source for reviews. In fact, the website creator doesn't appear to be entirely neutral when it comes to comparing EA Canada and EA Black Box games. People are entitled to their own opinions in these sites, but Wikipedia presses for NPOV in articles, so this site is removed and replaced with a {{verify source}} tag, awaiting a notable and reliable source to back this claim up.
  • The UGO reference (which review NFS Underground) on the claim that the "lack of realism could give gamers a different impression of driving in real life" is not a reliable source. While the review notes the lack of realism in the game, it doesn't suggest that it has "a different impression of driving in real life." This reference has been removed in place of a {{verify source}} tag.
In summary, what is needed is a balanced set of references for the entire series, or better yet, a reliable source that discusses the entire series' development from the beginning to present. Personally, the latter would be much preferable. Notable references to any sort of encouragements of reckless driving aside the Merc accident in the "Encouragement of reckless road behavior" section is also most welcomed. ╫ 25 ◀RingADing▶ 18:09, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The intention of this addition to the NFS column was based on providing information that would interest people like myself. The NFS series is the most popular motoring game series in the world but some players want something different. At an earlier stage I had difficulty finding driving simulator based games since access to information/games were not so easily available, however in the past few years I was able to do so and my intention was to help people who are not interested in arcade based games to guide them to some simulation based games. I realise people have different interests and I did not mean to offend people who like NFS a lot. I too enjoy a bit of arcade style action like the hot pursuits. My intentions were just to provide people a link to the other genere of racing games that are increasing in popularity. Just to clarify the issue, I am not saying NFS is crap. I have edited my article to prove umpteen references about the arcade style nature of the game from game reviewers and specially provided one seperately which makes a discussion of the differences in real life car handling from a NFS game's physics model. The evidence clearly establishes that NFS series has overall been an Arcade based gaming series and its fans should appreciate that as a sign of good entertainment. This evidence has benefits everybody and it is not a matter of discriminating against NFS fans. Also the NFS Porche realism reference is provided (and I added one for somebody who edited my text to add the NFS 1 realism as well). The reason why the GTR2 reference is made is to further inform people about an example of a game belonging to the simulation genere to compliment the information I am trying to provide in the beginning of this section. Many wikipedia articles have references to other topics which may be alternatives to the topic being dicussed e.g. Adobe Photoshop talks about a free alternative GIMP and Microsoft Windows has references to Linux, in the same spirit I aim to provide these alternatives. Hope this helps clear this up. GuardianOfTruth 17:26, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]


I don't have much time to research the areas of my text. Sorry if it doesnt meet Wikipedia standards but if you feel that it is still not suitable then feel free to edit it as needed. As I mentioned in the earlier message that my intention was just to help new gamers who are interested in simulation based racing games to some of those types of games (as I was one of them before). Maybe the solution is to have an 'Alternative Racing Genere' section where this is mentioned. Anyway I entrust this section into your care from now on. Do as needed and thanks for the assistance. GuardianOfTruth 19:51, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Deficiencies in game engine section doesn't seem a very neutral title (or perhaps even section) as the game engine was designed this way, perhaps if the game were marketed as a realistic simulator aspects of the engine would be deficient?!
Also this section has incorrect information (which I plan to update later) as it makes the comment The greatest disparity of the series, also emphazising its arcade style, is that in all games of the series the player´s vehicle is completely indestructible, where it's possible to crash head-on at 200 MPH with a truck and continue the race as if nothing had happened. High Stakes has a damage model which can severely hamper the performance of the car after crashing, and although my memory is a little sketchy I think that Porsche 2000 also has a damage model, I can't remember if there were other titles in the series that also had one?? Alternative Theory 00:26, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rename

I suggest we rename this article to Need for Speed Series.--Taida 21:08, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just to correct, the proper destination should be Need for Speed series. This is in line with Wikipedia:Naming convention#Lowercase second and subsequent words. ╫ 25 ◀RingADing▶ 09:49, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Since this has been sitting here a while with no objections, I'll just be bold and do it. That would be proper anyway, as there aren't many different forms of Need For Speed. Alex43223 Talk | Contribs | E-mail 07:44, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Features in the games not mentioned in the articles

No mention of the replays that could be saved in NFS5 - Porsche Unleashed and prior versions of Need For Speed (at least back to NFS2, don't know about NFS or NFSSE). NFS6 - HP2 only has post race replays with the same view as used for racing. Several of the post NFS5 releases have no replay feature at all.

update - NFS and NFSSE did have a replay feature.

No mention of the ghost feature that only NFS4 - High Stakes has. NFS10 - Carbon includes a shadow mode, but apparently the only way to exchange these is through EA's online server.

Regarding the replays, the replays of NFS4 and NFS5 were controller input based. Prior versions may also have used controller input based replays. The advantage of this is that replays can be exchanged between players and systems, as a means to prove that a lap time was legitimately made, and that the game itself played the same on various PC systems. For NFS4 and NFS5, there are player created utilities to dump all the peformance related info from a replay, such as tuning, parts (NFS5), cheat codes, assists, weather (NFS4); RP4INFO for NFS4, and Silent Witness for NFS5.

Regarding realism, NFS2/ NFS2SE in simulation mode wern't that bad. NFS5 - Porsche Unleashed gave the top road car, 1995 911 turbo about 3g's of cornering grip according to the speedometer and lap times on the test track. The race cars, 935 and GT1 were severely handicapped with inefficient transmissions (65% for the 935, 70% for the GT1, 90% to 95% for the road cars), apparently in an attempt to limit how much faster these cars would be without the handicaps. Also longitudinal traction was an issue. The game and real life specs for the 935 indicate a 0 to 60mph time of 2.8 seconds, but it takes about double this in the game.

Regarding criticims of NFS4 - High Stakes being too much like NFS3 - Hot Pursuit, I don't remember this. Although the speedometers indicated lower speeds, the pace was quicker in NFS4, with shorter lap times. NFS4 was the first one with true online (EA server based) racing game in the series with stats. It was the first with a career mode. It included the McLaren F1 and the Mercedes CLK GTR, each of which was the best car depending on the track (the CLK did better on the high speed tracks like Celtic Ruins, Raceway 2, but also Dolphin Cove, and for some players Redrock). It was the first with a online knockout mode where the losers drove trucks to ram the remaining racers, similar to Pusuit KO in Carbon.

Jeffareid (talk) 13:54, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

crash models

I might be mistaken, but I've always heard that crash models aren't usually used in games with real cars because the car companies don't want to show their cars getting damaged, that why some series, like Rush, and Midnight Club, have realistic crash models while Need for Speed doesn't. I think this should be mentioned in the criticisms section. Compgeek86 00:58, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A notable source to back up this claim that the cars lack damage for this reason is preferable. The truth, not matter how apparent, is not preferable if there are no verifications of the claim being noted by any notable publications. ╫ 25 ◀RingADing▶ 11:17, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Characters in the Need for Speed series

Hi! Please help to expand this new article: Need for Speed series characters. --MrStalker 14:18, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PlayStation Portable games?

Why should this article, that does not cover a specific game, be in Category:PlayStation Portable games and not in for example Category:Xbox 360 games? It does not make any sence, and looks like promotion for PSP. I remove this article from the category until someone can up with a valid reason. --MrStalker 10:05, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Because Need for Speed: Underground Rivals, which is listed here, doesn't have its own article and isn't a direct cousin of its PC and console title (as is the case of Need for Speed Most Wanted: 5-1-0 and Need for Speed Carbon: Own the City) where its article can include the category. Until an independent article of the game is created, omitting this category leaves Rivals unrepresented in Category:PlayStation Portable games. ╫ 25 ◀RingADing▶ 14:59, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Underground: Rivals' cousins are Need for Speed: Underground 1 and 2. Since Rivals was created at the same time as Underground 2 and has a very similar gameplay it is most appropriate to include it in the Underground 2 article. Or at least make it an article for its own, not as small part of a large article cuz none will find it there anyway. --MrStalker 18:42, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Russian sources

Elk Salomon, feel free to post your russian sources on the russian wikipedia. But this is english wikipedia, and we need english sources. Pro Street is a rumour, nothing more, and it is now according to a english fansite denied by the developer. These rumours don't even state if Pro Street is the international title or just the russian one. --MrStalker 15:46, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MrStalker, please check WP:CITE. The sources could be given in any language unless there is proper and correct source is found in English. NFS-Planet was not correct and did not noticed that the title was unveiled by the official publisher. Unless you find any correct English sources that will explain it was not a rumor, but a leak, the Russian source should be given in priority to correctness. Especially consider the fact that AG is professional reliable game news agency, most reliable of all Russian sources that could be given and is one of largest pc game websites. Unlike NFS-Planet, which is amateur fun site that copying all things from all over the world, even not checking them. Elk Salmon 15:53, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Why do copy the same text here as in my talk page? Well, I not going to answer twice. Further discussion is refered to my talk page. --MrStalker 16:09, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
(Since Elk Salamon insists on keeping the discussion here, I'll copy my reply here as well)
LOL. First, I did not break the three revert rule. Three reverts is allowed. Second, as far as I am concerned, NFS-Planet is fully correct. I have yet not seen any evidence to suggest otherwise. Thirdly, Soft Club is definitely not the official publisher. Not in the majority of the world. Even if we suppose you're correct, does your source say anything about that Pro Street is an international title? I rest my case. --MrStalker 16:01, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keeping related to NFS here. Not LOL. But take it seriously. You inventing WP:OR. It is not in your right to define how to interpret the source. It is also not in your right to define what information have right to be posted and what is not. It is also and original research. NFS-Planet was not a primary source and was not explaining full case. You can't just say - 'some sources suggested' refering to source 1, which is refer to source 2, which is partially copied source 3, when you have the source #3, which is expose a whole uncut case and explaining why it was suggested. Also, whole phrase 'some Russian sources suggested' is completely incorrect, because sources did not suggested on their own, but referred to official source. It doesn't matter if it's not a western publisher, Soft Club is still official source. Deny is also not a correct word. EA employee has said "i don't think it will be called so. it's bullshit.". It's not an answer, but simple equivocation from asked question. Elk Salmon 16:20, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
"It's bullshit" sounds pretty damn much like a denial to me. And as I wrote before: Even if we suppose you're correct, does your source say anything about that Pro Street is an international title, or just a Russian one? And consider this: Need for Speed: Pro Street was completely removed from the list, while almost every other "future titles" stayed. May it not occur to you that that info was incorrect? --MrStalker 16:34, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't says it should have been Russian title only. Soft club does not naming usually. Soft club usually publishing discs without even adding Russian language and selling them by western price. Anyway. You put ifs to how to interpret the source. It's and original research. There is a source which is fully explain an origin of this so called rumor. It should be given in the article. I have to remind how it was given.

According to the Russian publisher of the game, Soft Club, the game will have the title Need for Speed: Pro Street and is planned to release in November 2007. It doesn't says it's going to be international title. But also doesn't says it's going to be Russian title only. It's only saying that the title will be so, according to SC. And it doesn't says that this is going to be final title. It says according to.

However, information from the Soft Club site was removed soon after publishing. The AG source is reliable unlike NFS-Planet in this way, which is just saying it's appeared somewhere we don't know. AG explains where it came from and what is happened to it.

EA did not confirmed the title and said the title is still secret. This was left to NFS-Planet, because official bullshit is not really nice to be posted. But 'I think it's bullshit' is private opinion of EA employee. Learn was is equivocation technique. Even if what he said was true, he did not answered straight back on the question. Elk Salmon 16:56, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that is what you keep telling me. And I keep telling you that there is no way for me to verify that, and you have yet failed to give me an oppertunity to do so. However, since I'm a nice guy at heart, we can just include both sources, or opinions if you like, in the article. --MrStalker 17:52, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The original source to verify was given. Elk Salmon 18:33, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well, thanks for the effort but I can't understand Russian, as I'm sure you can't understand Swedish. If I had a Swedish source that states some doubtful information which I claim is 100% correct, what would you think? Btw, bablefish can translate many of the words, but still leaves a lot messed up. --MrStalker 20:11, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If it was information from Sweden than Swedish source should have been given unless any English correct was appeared. But NFS-Planet information was not correct saying "some magazines suggested", when it was not suggested, but was leaked on official publisher's site. Plus NFS-Planet contain a link to small Russian fan site. Elk Salmon 23:50, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I see your point but my point is that from where I'm seeing it, your source is no more correct then NFS-Planet is, 'cause there is no way to verify what you're saying. Anyway, I think we include both sources and leave it. --MrStalker 12:26, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Do you listening, MrStalker? The original source has been provided. The fact that you don't know the language doesn't mean it can't be verified. And all what did NFS-Planet is translated linked Russian article from small fan site, which wasn't full and correct. Elk Salmon 02:55, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No, I do not listen, I am reading. Are you reading, Elk Salmon? I'm not going to say it again. Please read my post one more time and think a little bit. Use a translator if you must, 'cause it seems like you don't understand. This is my final post on this topic. --MrStalker 11:04, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Customization of cars

This could be done allready in porsche! you could upgrade with parts, change paint ect, mostly engie upgrades —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 85.166.214.149 (talk) 16:53, 4 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]


Release date for ProStreet

What's with the back and forth on the October vs. November release dates? It's already clearly reached the WP:3RR limit. Xihr 22:54, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.


Need for Speed seriesNeed for Speed (series) — Using "()" around the "series" is the standard title formatting used in most video game related articlesMrStalker talk 15:13, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

This article has been renamed from Need for Speed series to Need for Speed (series) as the result of a move request. --Stemonitis 05:31, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that the unqualified Need for Speed is a redirect to this article, which would appear to make the suffix unnecessary. You may like to consider whether that article should redirect elsewhere, or whether this article should be moved to that, simpler, title. --Stemonitis 05:37, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, because there are other meanings of "Need for Speed". See Need for Speed (disambiguation). --MrStalker talk 15:01, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Images

I removed the images from this page, as they were purely decorative and were not being discussed in any manner which required their usage for the reader to comprehend the article. ^demon[omg plz] 17:56, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And I reverted your change because the images is necessary to describe the subject of the article. --MrStalker talk 12:14, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ez egy nagyon jo jatek mvil hogy nagyon sok gyermek szokta jatszani, es en is koztuk vagyok. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.126.238.96 (talk) 19:19, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

future of the franchise

is there any source for Underground 3? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.167.19.113 (talk) 17:52, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, which is why the unfounded rumors that keep being added need to be reverted. Xihr (talk) 22:08, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Need for Speed GT

As of 5/07/2008, I do not believe there is an article about the arcade game Need for Speed GT. Go here for some info http://www.klov.com/game_detail.php?game_id=13174 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.27.42.248 (talk) 09:03, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Need For Speed High Stakes (Playstation) Cars.

In the Playstation version, The Aston Martin DB7 was in the game at the Playstation version's release, while it was missing in the PC version and it needed to be downloaded online to get. Also, the Mclaren F1 GTR is based off the 1997 Long Tail while the PC version based it off the original 95/96 version —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shadowmario64fan (talkcontribs) 20:45, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gameplay

Several games in the franchise included the game mode of police pursuit, which first started with Need for Speed: Hot Pursuit Note the original NFS (and NFSSE) included cops in the "head to head" mode races, where the player could get stopped and tickted or arrested (had to restart that section).

In drift races, the player must defeat other racers by setting higher points than the other racers; these points are earned by the length and timing of the drift made by the player's vehicle. The factors are angle, speed, and distance, and the relative importance varies between games.

In drag races, the player uses a car set in manual transmission. The objective in this type of race is to follow an opposing car and mimic its performance to gain a boost in the player's speed. The objective is to win the drag race straight out. Drafting rarely worked in drag races.

Also introduced with Underground was the customization of vehicles High Stakes included the tuning of the cars and a custom pallete for paint. Porsche Unleashed included tuning, performance part upgrades, and some custom paint schemes.

From 1994—2002, the games did not feature traffic Traffic was present in the original NFS game, in the "head to head" race mode. Traffic was present in the pursuit modes of Hot Pursuit (1 and 2), High Stakes, and Porshe Unleashed factory driver "delivery" events (these also included cops, but the cops could only ram a players car, not stop it).

Jeffareid (talk) 13:45, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

i believe that the gameplay section should be erased because the series has changed focus many times ie dropping features of previous games, adding new features and there is not a one description fits all. the current gameplay section is representative of the underground and following games but doesn't say much about the previous games. besides each game has its own article.

Wikitripper (talk) 03:37, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

If possible, could someone add warnings to the following IP addresses, since they have been vandalizing this page: 168.122.161.234 87.13.81.25 77.253.96.44 87.41.191.188 Thanks Webman25 (talk) 22:05, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pursuit

Taken from Section: "Need for Speed: Hot Pursuit 2": Although the game allowed players to play as the police, the pursuit mode was drastically less realistic than preceding versions of NFS; players merely needed to "tap" a speeder a certain number of times to arrest them, as opposed to using actual police tactics such as the PIT maneuver to immobilize a speeding vehicle.

This is true for the PC version, but the PS2 version requires the cop to syop the speeder in order to give the speeder a ticket. I can't find a citation for this, so I would like to discuss it before I change the statement. Leujohn (talk) 05:43, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Major Revision Proposal

Greetings,
I am the community manager for the Electronic Arts - Need for Speed franchise. You can contact me at Drew@NeedforSpeed.com and/or verify this by viewing any of the articles I post on http://www.needforspeed.com. Here is my most recent article --> http://www.needforspeed.com/portal/site/nfs/news/details/?contentId=a31486874b6b0210VgnVCM100000100d2c0aRCRD

I would like to propose some revisions to the Need for Speed wiki pages. Specifically, I would like to make revisions to the following pages:

1. NFS Main page
2. NFS Carbon
3. NFS Most Wanted
4. NFS Pro Street
5. NFS Undercover
6. NFS Underground 2
7. NFS Underground

The purpose of these revisions are to correct various spelling and grammar errors, remove biased and opinionated content (regardless if it's positive or negative), ensure that the NFS franchise is represented accurately and fairly, and add specific information currently omitted from the pages.

The purpose of these revisions ARE NOT to make the pages an extension of EA marketing / PR, an advertising asset, to remove content that reflects negatively on the Need for Speed franchise, or make any changes that go against the Wikipedia Policies and Guidelines.

My list of revisions is quite extensive so I would prefer not to list every single one on this talk page. I do, however, have the proposed changes documented in Word files that I would very much like to share with you guys before I go ahead and start editing the pages.

If you are interested in seeing the proposed changes and providing me with feedback then send me a email at Drew@NeedforSpeed.com. I welcome your input on my changes and hope that we can agree that the changes I propose meet the expectations I've set out above.

Thanks you,
NFSDrew - April 22, 2009 —Preceding unsigned comment added by NFSDrew (talkcontribs) 21:56, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the rumor about Criterion Games' Need for Speed

There was rumor about Criterion Games' Need for Speed entry going back to the style of The Need for Speed, however it has been proven false, as explained here: [1] --MrStalker (talk) 12:55, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Need for Speed on mobile platforms

Need for Speed Shift is available on ipad, iphone and Nokia N8 (Ovi store). There is an official video on the Nokia UK YouTube site from Nokia world showing the game being played through the HDMI port. The Nokia N8 smartphone acts as a controller and the the game is played on the TV as if it's a home style console. Should these platforms therefore be included in the article? There are plenty of references from the the YouTube site, the Ovi store, the Nokia N8 home page and the Apple apps store. Kwaichi (talk) 14:48, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Team Need For Speed

I guess some information should be added in this article about Team NFS, that takes part in FIA GT Champoinship and Formula D http://www.needforspeed.com/teamnfs —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.192.233.162 (talk) 13:32, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mega Brands License?

On November 30, 2010, it was announced that Electronic Arts and Mega Brands, Inc. have agreed to a licensing deal whereby the latter company will produce sets based on the video game series. Might a mention of the license agreement be added to this article?

Here's a link to the announcement: http://media.megabrands.com/pdf/corpo/en/20101130_.pdf —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.61.129.94 (talk) 02:48, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Citation

Where is the citation for this? "Due to law enforcement reasons, there were no cops in Underground and Underground 2, which drew criticism as cops were an important part of previous titles' gameplay. The game received good reviews which generally criticised cops not being in the game." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.151.130.21 (talk) 19:09, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Need For Speed Underground

Should there not be a summery of NFS:Underground between hot pursuit 2 and underground 2?