Jump to content

Cascadia movement: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Ipawn (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 215: Line 215:
[[Category:Secession in Canada]]
[[Category:Secession in Canada]]
[[Category:Culture of the Pacific Northwest]]
[[Category:Culture of the Pacific Northwest]]
[[Category:Cascadia movement]]


[[de:Kaskadien]]
[[de:Kaskadien]]

Revision as of 10:39, 19 September 2011

Proposed Country of Cascadia
Flag of Cascadia
Proposed boundaries in respect to political territorial entities (British Columbia, Washington State, and Oregon)
Proposed boundaries in respect to political territorial entities (British Columbia, Washington State, and Oregon)
CapitalNone proposed
Largest citySeattle
National languageEnglish (de facto)[b]
Demonym(s)Cascadian
GovernmentBioregional Republic (proposed)
Population
• 2009, 2010 census
15,000,710
GDP (PPP)2006 estimate
• Total
$618.5 billion[1] (22nd)
• Per capita
$40,217[1] (8th)
GDP (nominal)2006 estimate
• Total
$618.5 billion[2] (18th)
• Per capita
$40,217[1] (16th)
Driving sideright
^ a. *Statistics are compiled from US and Canadian census records by combining information from the states of Washington, Oregon and British Columbia. If the entire Cascadian bioregion was taken into account, GDP and population would be much higher.

Cascadia is the proposed name for an independent nation located within the Cascadian bioregion of the Pacific Northwest region of North America. Proposed boundaries differ, with some drawn along existing political state and provincial lines, and others drawn along larger ecological, cultural and economic boundaries.

The nation would be created by secession of British Columbia from Canada, along with Oregon, Washington and portions of other states from the United States. At its maximum extent Cascadia would extend from the coastal Alaskan Panhandle to the north, extending into Northern California in the south, and inland to include parts of Alberta, the Yukon, Idaho and Western Montana.

As measured only by the combination of present B.C., Washington and Oregon statistics, Cascadia would be home to more than 20 million people, and an economy generating more than $750 billion worth of goods and services annually, which would place Cascadia in the top 20 economies of the world.[3] Its second largest city, Seattle, itself has an economy slightly smaller than Thailand, but larger than Colombia and Venezuela.[4] By land area Cascadia would be the 20th largest nation in the world, with a land area of 1,384,588 km² (534,572 sq mi), placing it right behind Mongolia.

19th Century

Columbia District

Thomas Jefferson said he viewed Fort Astoria "as the germ of a great, free, and independent empire on that side of our continent".[5]

An 1813 letter from Thomas Jefferson to John Jacob Astor congratulated Astor on the establishment of Fort Astoria (the coastal fur trade post of Astor's Pacific Fur Company) and described Fort Astoria as "the germ of a great, free, and independent empire on that side of our continent, and that liberty and self-government spreading from that as well as from this side, will insure their complete establishment over the whole." He went on to criticize the British, who were also establishing fur trade networks in the region: "It would be an afflicting thing, indeed, should the English be able to break up the settlement. Their bigotry to the bastard liberty of their own country, and habitual hostility to every degree of freedom in any other, will induce the attempt."[5] [6]The same year of Jefferson's letter, Fort Astoria was sold to the British North West Company, based in Montreal.

John Quincy Adams agreed with Jefferson's views about Fort Astoria, and labeled the entire Northwest as "the empire of Astoria",[7] although he also saw the whole continent as "destined by Divine Providence to be peopled by one nation."[8] As late as the 1820s James Monroe and Thomas Hart Benton thought the region west of the Rockies would be an independent nation.[8]

Elements among the region's population sought to form their own country from the very beginning. Oregon pioneer John McLoughlin was employed as the "Chief Factor" (regional administrator) by the Hudson's Bay Company for the Columbia District, administered from Fort Vancouver. McLoughlin was a significant force in the early history of the Oregon Country, and argued for its independence.[9] In 1842 McLoughlin (through his lawyer) advocated an independent nation that would be free of the United States during debates at the Oregon Lyceum.[9] This view won support at first and a resolution was adopted. When the first settlers of the Willamette Valley held a series of politically foundational meetings in 1843, called the "Wolf Meetings," a majority voted to establish an independent republic. [10]. Action was postponed by George Abernethy of the Methodist Mission to wait on forming an independent country.[9]

In May 1843 the settlers in the Oregon Territory created their first “western style” government as a Provisional Government. Several months later the Organic Laws of Oregon were drawn up to create a legislature, an executive committee, a judicial system, and a system of subscriptions to defray expenses. Members of the ultra-American party insisted that the final lines of the Organic Act would be “until such time as the USA extend their jurisdiction over us” to try to end the Oregon Territorial independence movement. George Abernethy was elected its first and only Provisional Governor, with an opposing faction led by Osborne Russell favoring independence. Russell proposed that the Oregon Territory not join the United States, but instead become a Pacific Republic that stretched from the Pacific Ocean to the Continental Divide.

British claims north of the Columbia River were ceded to the United States by the contentious Oregon Treaty of 1846. In 1860 there were three different statements from separate influential individuals on the creation of a "Pacific Republic".[11]

Civil War

When the Southern states of the U.S. seceded to form the Confederate States of America, some Oregon Territory settlers reacted to the instability of the union as another opportunity to seek independence.

At the same time, other movements inside of Cascadia, such as the Klamath movement, Trinity and Jackson movements all sought to wrench certain areas of Cascadia free from U.S. control.[citation needed] These too failed, largely by being put down through various uses of force.[citation needed]

Californians unsympathetic to the Union also pushed for the reestablishment of the Republic of California as an independent entity.[citation needed] The leader of California's federal forces at the outset of the Civil War was himself a supporter of the Confederate cause, but that movement proved weaker than its opposition. For his role in convincing Californians to remain in the Union, Thomas Starr King was honored as one of the two "heroes of California" in the U.S. Capitol's National Statuary Hall Collection.[citation needed]

While independence movements during this time failed to take root, the Pacific Northwest continued to ferment a radical and aggressive form of regionalism. This is exemplified by Adell M. Parker, president of the University of Washington Alumni Association, in his speech at the groundbreaking of the Seattle campus:

That the West should un-falteringly follow the East in fashions and ideals would be as false and fatal as that America should obey the standards of Europe. Let the West, daring and unprejudiced, discover its own ideals and follow them. The American standard in literature and philosophy has long been fixed by the remote East. Something wild and free, something robust and full will come out of the West and be recognized in the final American type. Under the shadow of those great mountains a distinct personality shall arise, it shall adopt other fashions, create new ideals, and generations shall justify them (“With Due Formality” 1894).[12]

20th Century

State of Jefferson

Proposed flag of the State of Jefferson.

After attempts in the mid 19th century at forming a State of Jefferson prior to becoming Oregon and then again in the 1930s, citizens attempted the best known of such movements in the region. During 1940 and 1941, organizers attracted media attention by arming themselves and blockading Highway 99 to the south of Yreka, California, where they collected tolls from motorists and passed out proclamations of independence. When a California Highway Patrolman turned up on the scene, he was told to “get down the road back to California”. The movement was created to draw attention to the area by proposing that Southern Oregon and Northern California secede from their respective state governments to form a separate state within the United States.[13] A perceived lack of attention and resources from their state governments led to the adoption of a flag design bearing a gold pan and two X's, a "double cross".[14] The movement quickly ended however after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941.

Stanton Delaplane's coverage of the State of Jefferson won the 1942 Pulitzer Prize for Reporting.

In 1956, groups from Cave Junction, Oregon and Dunsmuir, California threatened to tear Southern Oregon and Northern California from their respective state rulers to form the State of Jefferson.[14]

Cascadia as Columbian watershed

The term "Cascades" was first used for the Cascades Rapids, as early as the Astor Expedition.[15] The earliest attested use of the term for the mountain range dates to 1825, in the writings of botanist David Douglas.[16] During geological explorations in the early 1900s the term was first applied to the region.

In 1970 the term "Cascadia" was adopted by David McCloskey, a Seattle University sociology professor, to describe the region.[citation needed] McCloskey describes Cascadia as "a land of falling waters." He notes the blending of the natural integrity and the sociocultural unity that gives Cascadia its definition.

McCloskey is the source of the proposed Cascadian boundaries that include the complete watershed of the Columbia River, including the territories of what is now Idaho, western Montana, and smaller parts of Wyoming, Utah, and northern Nevada.

According to McCloskey, this "initial" Cascadia included parts of seven jurisdictions (Northern California, Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Western Montana, British Columbia, and South East Alaska), running in the north from the top of the Alaska panhandle to Cape Mendocino, California in the south–and covering all the land and "falling waters" from the continental divide at the Rocky Mountains to the Pacific Ocean. McCloskey, founder of the Cascadia Institute and co‐chair of Seattle University’s New Ecological Studies Program, saw Cascadian identity as something which transcends political or geographic definitions; it is more a cultural, ideological identity.[citation needed]

Ecotopia

see main article Ecotopia

The 1975 environmental Utopian novel by Ernest Callenbach, Ecotopia, follows an American reporter, William Weston, on his tour through a secretive republic (the former Washington, Oregon, and northern California) 20 years after their secession from the U.S. At first wary and uncomfortable, Weston is shown a society that's been centrally planned, scaled down, and readapted to fit within the constraints of environmental sustainability.

The self-published book was a best-seller. Some of Ecotopia's exotic environmental strategies (recycling bins, an emphasis on locally grown food, a bicycle sharing system, etc.) have become commonplace. More importantly the book has had a surprisingly long-lasting impact, as a required text in universities, and as direct influence on the German Green Party. "Almost immediately absorbed into the popular culture," the concept of an Ecotopia has influenced perceptions of the Northwest.[17] Callenbach produced a prequel, Ecotopia Emerging, in 1981.

While other conceptions followed, this first "enviro‐branding" has had significant staying power thanks to being followed shortly by Joel Garreau's Nine Nations of North America (1981). Garreau’s Ecotopia, one of the "Nine Nations" included the Pacific Northwest coast west of the Cascade Range stretching from southern Alaska in the north to coastal areas of British Columbia, down through Washington state, Oregon and into California just north of Santa Barbara. According to Garreau, Ecotopia is a land of individualism and the environment. For Garreau, these "nine nations" provided a more accurate way of understanding North American society.

Regional identity

The idea of Cascadia as an economic cross-border region has been embraced by a wide diversity of civic leaders and organizations. The "Main Street Cascadia" transportation corridor concept was formed by former mayor of Seattle Paul Schell during 1991 and 1992.[citation needed] Schell later defended his cross-border efforts during the 1999 American Planning Association convention, saying "that Cascadia represents better than states, countries and cities the cultural and geographical realities of the corridor from Eugene to Vancouver, B.C."[18] Schell also formed the Cascadia Mayors Council, bringing together mayors from cities along the corridor from Whistler, BC, to Medford, Oregon. The council last met in May, 2004.[19] Other cross-border groups were set up in the 1990s, such as the Cascadia Economic Council and the Cascadia Corridor Commission.[20] These groups were established to focus on transportation issues, and have not advocated secession or independence.

The Oregon Country as claimed by the United States. The Columbia District extended much farther north.

The region is served by several cooperative organizations and interstate or international agencies, especially since 2008 with the signing of the Pacific Coast Collaborative which places new emphasis on bio-regionally coordinated policies on the environmental, forestry and fishery management, emergency preparedness and critical infrastructure, regional high speed rail and road transportation as well as tourism[21]

Under some definitions, Cascadia is energy sufficient, due to the high propensity for renewable energy resources (mostly hydroelectric and geothermal) and supplies many other western states such as California and Idaho with some electricity.

The area from Vancouver B.C. down to Portland has been termed a megaregion by the National Committee for America 2050, a coalition of regional planners, scholars, and policy-makers. This group defines a megaregion as an area where "boundaries begin to blur, creating a new scale of geography now known as the megaregion." These areas have interlocking economic systems, shared natural resources and ecosystems, and common transportation systems link these population centers together. This area contains 17% of Cascadian land mass, but more than 80% of the Cascadian population.[22] Programs such as the enhanced drivers license program can be used to more easily cross the border between Washington and British Columbia.[citation needed]

A research study by the Western Standard in 2005 found that support for exploring secession from Canada sits at 35.7% in British Columbia, and 42% in Alberta.[23] While difficult to gauge support specifically in Washington and Oregon, because no research has been done for those states, a nationwide poll by Zogby International in 2008 found that 22% of Americans now support a state's or region's right to peacefully secede from the United States, the highest rate since the American Civil War.[24] However, none of these studies are specifically about forming an independent Cascadia.

Cascadia as an integrated bioregion

A map of one of the definitions of the Cascadia Bioregion

Cascadian bioregionalism is closely identified with the environmental movement. In the early 1970s, a vision of bioregionalism began to be formed through collaboration among natural scientists, social and environmental activists, artists and writers, community leaders, and back-to-the-landers who worked directly with natural resources. A bioregion is defined in terms of the unique overall pattern of natural characteristics that are found in a specific place. The main features are generally obvious throughout a continuous geographic terrain and include a particular climate, local aspects of seasons, landforms, watersheds, soils, and native plants and animals. People are also counted as an integral aspect of a place’s life, as can be seen in the ecologically adaptive cultures of early inhabitants, and in the activities of present day inhabitants who attempt to harmonize in a sustainable way with the place where they live.[25]

Cascadian bioregionalism deals with the connected ecological, environmental, economic, and cultural ties that bind the Pacific Northwest states and provinces together and distance them from their eastern counterparts. The argument is that those in Washington and Oregon have much more in common with those in British Columbia than those in Washington D.C.[citation needed] This argument continues to gain ground as efforts to create integrated transportation and economic system, stem pollution and global warming, and support sustainable alternatives increasingly requires the commitment of larger regional players.[citation needed]

The Cascadia Bioregion has been defined in several different ways. One definition is all the watersheds of rivers that empty into the Pacific Ocean in North America's temperate rainforest zone, from northern California to Prince William Sound in Alaska, and extending inland to the continental divide. This definition includes all of Washington, most of Oregon and Idaho, part of British Columbia, and smaller parts of California, Nevada, Utah, Wyoming, Montana, and Alaska.[26][27] Another definition limits the bioregion to the coastal region west of the Cascade Range and Coast Mountains in British Columbia, Washington, and Oregon.[28] Sometimes this definition is extended conceptually from northern California to Alaska.[29] In some cases this coastal definition of the bioregion is extended north and west to Kodiak Island, Alaska.[30]

International cooperation

The idea of Cascadia as a political secessionist movement has received a degree of attention; however a more common idea of Cascadia is that of a cross-border region whose shared culture and interests transcend the international boundary—a region integrated in terms of ecology, economics, culture, and political cooperation.[31] Despite a degree of shared cross-border history and cooperation, however, national connections are much more powerful than international ties within Cascadia.[32]

Cascadia exhibits binational and regional cooperation, governing bodies as well as cross-border NGOs. These ties continue to be strengthened through initiatives such as the establishment of a cross-border state ID card in 2006, the 'Pacific Coast Collaboration' agreement (PCC) signed by the governors of California, Oregon, Washington and Alaska and the premier of British Columbia in 2008, the bioregional 'Cascadia Mayors Council' founded in 1996 and the establishment of the Pacific Northwest Economic Region in 1991, a regional U.S.-Canadian forum in which all legislative members and governors are voting members, along with a consortium of the regions most powerful non-profit, public and private sector companies.[33][34] PNWER is recognized by both the United States and Canada as the “model” for regional and bi-national cooperation that provides the public and private sectors a cross-border forum that legal scholar Andrew Petter, a former BC cabinet minister and President of Simon Fraser University,[35] describes as one of North America's most sophisticated examples of "regionalist paradiplomacy".[36] PNWERis the only statutory, non-partisan, bi-national, public/private partnership in North America.[37] However, none of these bi-national efforts promote secession.

Secessionist activism

Cascadian secessionist movements generally state that their political motivations deal mostly with political, economic, cultural and ecological ties, as well as the beliefs that the eastern federal governments are out of touch, slow to respond, and hinder state and provincial attempts at further bioregional integration.[38] These connections go back to the Oregon Territory, and further back to the Oregon Country, the land most commonly associated with Cascadia, and the last time the region was treated as a single political unit, though administered by two countries.[38] Some have asserted that political protest in the wake of the 2004 presidential election appears to be the primary reason for renewed separatist movements throughout states with substantial Democratic majorities, such as Washington and Oregon.[39][40]

On September 9, 2001, the Cascadian National Party website was launched on Angelfire,[41] but faltered quickly.

Currently, the primary organization promoting regional sovereignty is the Cascadian Independence Project, with members in cities such as Vancouver BC, Victoria, Bellingham, Seattle, Tacoma, Bellevue, Walla Walla, Spokane, Olympia, Portland, Eugene, and Salem.[42]

Other groups discussing the Cascadia concept, such as The Sightline Institute, Crosscut, and Cascadia Prospectus, see the concept as one of a transnational cooperative identity, not secession. Still others, such as The Republic of Cascadia, are whimsical expressions of political protest.

References in popular culture

"Doug" flag
  • The "Doug" Cascadian flag appears to be the most commonly adopted flag of the movement. [43] Designed by Portland, Oregon native Alexander Baretich in 1994, its blue represents sky and the Pacific Ocean, the white represents clouds and snow, and the green represents the forest. [44] As of 2010 the "Doug" has also been adopted by the Portland Timbers Timbers Army, sometimes of giant size. [45] In 2010, Hopworks Urban Brewery in Portland introduced Secession Black IPA with the Doug flag as part of its label.[46] Hopworks has since dropped the "Black India Pale Ale" idiom in favor of the more etymologically correct moniker Secession Cascadian Dark Ale. [47]
  • Eric Hoffer in The Temper of Our Time (1967) proposed "a pilot state made up of a slice of northern California and a slice of southern Oregon" in which "the main purpose of life would be for people to learn and grow." Hoffer feared that, as meaningful work was automated away through technology, rootlessness would become a societal problem unless channeled in other directions such as education and personal growth, and proposed this region for his pilot state in part because it had good potential for work restoring ravaged soils and forests, work which would result in "the simultaneous reclamation of natural and human resources".
  • The 2005 North American Science Fiction Convention (or NASFiC), Cascadia Con, presented itself as a Cascadian convention, using material from The Republic of Cascadia website, a previous year's Norwescon Science Fiction Convention doing the same thing, and other sources.[48]
  • In the Crimson Skies universe, the nation of Pacifica is formed out of Oregon, Washington and British Columbia.
  • In January 2011, Time magazine included Cascadia on a list of "Top 10 Aspiring Nations", though noting it "has little chance of ever becoming a reality".[50]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c "United States". International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 2010-04-21.
  2. ^ Cite error: The named reference IMF GDP was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  3. ^ Preston, Peter (28 February 2010). "A world away from Texas". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 28 April 2010.
  4. ^ "Venting Nickels suggests secession". The Seattle Times. Seattle. 18 April 2008.
  5. ^ a b Jefferson, Thomas (1900). John P. Foley (ed.). The Jeffersonian cyclopedia. New York: Funk & Wagnalls. p. 61. ISBN 0846208873. OCLC 2339771. Retrieved 5 November 2010.
  6. ^ Jefferson, Thomas (1839). "A Pacific Republic". Retrieved December 18, 2010.
  7. ^ Ronda, James P. (1993). Astoria and Empire. University of Nebraska Press. p. xii. ISBN 9780803289420. Retrieved 5 November 2010.
  8. ^ a b Horsman, Reginald (1981). Race and Manifest Destiny: The Origins of American Racial Anglo-Saxonism. Harvard University Press. p. 87. ISBN 9780674948051. Retrieved 5 November 2010.
  9. ^ a b c Hines, Joseph Wilkinson. "CHAPTER VIII. The Provisional Government". Touching incidents in the life and labors of a pioneer on the Pacific coast since 1853. Library of Congress. Retrieved 2007-02-11.
  10. ^ http://www.ohs.org/education/oregonhistory/historical_records/dspDocument.cfm?doc_ID=92F96702-9FCF-BAC0-3411BF129F1F23DA
  11. ^ p.310 Ellison, William Henry A Self-Governing Dominion, California, 1849-1860 University of California Press, 1978
  12. ^ [1]
  13. ^ A Jefferson State of Mind. VIA Magazine Online. Retrieved 09 June 2007
  14. ^ a b Jefferson Public Radio "State of Jefferson"
  15. ^ McArthur, Lewis A.; McArthur, Lewis L. Oregon Geographic Names (6st ed.). Portland, Oregon: Oregon Historical Society Press. pp. 152–155.
  16. ^ Beckey, Fred (2003). Range of Glaciers: The Exploration and Survey of the Northern Cascade Range. Oregon Historical Society Press. p. 48. ISBN 0-87595-243-7.
  17. ^ "The Novel that Predicted Portland", New York Times, http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/14/fashion/14ecotopia.html
  18. ^ Planners ponder the future of 'Cascadia', Seattle Post-Intelligencer
  19. ^ Cascadia Corridor, Discovery Institute
  20. ^ Blatter, Joachim (2000). "Emerging Cross-Border Regions as a Step Toward Sustainable Development?". International Journal of Economic Development. 2 (3): 402–439. ISSN 1523-9748. OCLC 40894567. Retrieved 21 February 2011.
  21. ^ [2]
  22. ^ [3]
  23. ^ http://www.ctv.ca/CTVNews/Canada/20050809/separatist_poll_canada_050809/
  24. ^ http://www.zogby.com/News/ReadNews.cfm?ID=1531
  25. ^ [4]
  26. ^ "Map of Cascadia". Sightline Institute. Retrieved 26 August 2011.
  27. ^ Matthew Sparke (2005). In the space of theory: postfoundational geographies of the nation-state. U of Minnesota Press. pp. 68–69. ISBN 978-0-8166-3190-2. Retrieved 26 August 2011.
  28. ^ Ian Townsend-Gault (2005). Holding the Line: Borders in a Global World. UBC Press. p. 224. ISBN 978-0-7748-0932-0. Retrieved 26 August 2011.
  29. ^ Roger Gibbins; Loleen Berdahl (2003). Western visions, western futures: perspectives on the West in Canada. University of Toronto Press. p. 204. ISBN 978-1-55111-488-0. Retrieved 26 August 2011.
  30. ^ "Assessment of Conservation Priorities in Cascadia" (PDF). Ecotrust. Retrieved 26 August 2011.
  31. ^ Coates, Ken S. (2002). "Introduction". In Findlay, John M.; Coates, Ken S. (eds.). Parallel Destinies: Canadian-American Relations West of the Rockies. University of Washington Press. pp. 19–20. ISBN 9780295982526. Retrieved 20 December 2010.
  32. ^ Abbott, Carl (2002). "That Long Western Border: Canada, the United States, and a Century of Economic Change". In Findlay, John M.; Coates, Ken S. (eds.). Parallel Destinies: Canadian-American Relations West of the Rockies. University of Washington Press. pp. 203–213. ISBN 9780295982526. Retrieved 20 December 2010.
  33. ^ http://www.discovery.org/cascadia/cascadiaCorridor/
  34. ^ http://www.governor.wa.gov/news/news-view.asp?pressRelease=938&newsType=1
  35. ^ http://www.sfu.ca/archive-pamr/media_releases/media_releases_archives/media_01191001.html
  36. ^ http://www.unizar.es/union_europea/files/documen/conferencia%2010.2006/Petter-english_final.pdf
  37. ^ http://www.pnwer.org/
  38. ^ a b http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/news/westcoastnews/story.html?id=46e85afe-2e9c-4b5f-8c21-e5dcd72b35c3&p=1
  39. ^ http://washingtontimes.com/news/2004/nov/09/20041109-122753-5113r/
  40. ^ http://www.democracyforcalifornia.com/blog/archives/000424.html
  41. ^ http://www.angelfire.com/wa3/cascadia/ Cascadian National Party
  42. ^ http://cascadianow.org/ CascadiaNow!
  43. ^ "Cascadia: the Elusive Utopia", Douglas Todd, captions within color photo section
  44. ^ http://www.crwflags.com/fotw/flags/us%7Dcasc.html
  45. ^ http://pitchinvasion.net/blog/2010/07/17/kings-of-cascadia/
  46. ^ "Hopworks Secession Black IPA arrives", article at beernews.org
  47. ^ (http://mybeerbuzz.blogspot.com/2010/12/hopworkssecession-cascadian-dark-ale.html "HopWorks–Secession Cascadian Dark Ale NEW Packaging"), article at MyBeerBuzz.com
  48. ^ FaxCascadia, Newsletter of CascadiaCon, the 2005 NASFiC, 2005.
  49. ^ Fish Brewing Co. of Olympia, Washington. Retrieved 09 June 2007.
  50. ^ "Top 10 Aspiring Nations". Time. 10 January 2011.

Further reading

  • Todd, Douglas. "Cascadians: Shared Cultural Traits, Values." The Vancouver Sun. 7 May 2008.
  • Abraham, Kera. "A Free Cascadia." Eugene Weekly. 9 September 2006.
  • Fleming, Thomas. "America's Crackup." National Review, 28 June 1997, Vol. 49, Issue 14
  • Gauk, Matthew. "Welcome to the Evergreen Revolution." The Martlet, 9 November 2006.
  • Henkel, William B. "Cascadia: A state of (various) mind(s)." Chicago Review, 1993, Vol. 39, Issue 3/4
  • Jannsson, David. Divided we Stand, United We Fall (2006) - CounterPunch, 20 December 2006
  • Ketcham, Christopher. "Most Likely to Secede - Interviews with a few prominent figures who actively promote self governance." Good Magazine, January 2008.
  • Nussbaum, Paul. "Coming together to Ponder Pulling Apart." Philadelphia Inquirer, November 2006.
  • Overby, Peter. "We're outta here." Common Cause Magazine, Win92, Vol. 18, Issue 4
  • Crane, David, Paul Fraser, and James D. Phillips. "Western Regionalism: Views on Cascadia." Canada-United States Law Journal, 2004, Vol. 30, p321-347, 22p
  • Powell, Mark W. "The Americas: British Columbia's future may not lie with 'Old Canada'." Wall Street Journal. Jun 9, 1995. pg. A11
  • Todd, Douglas (2008). Cascadia, The Elusive Utopia: Exploring the Spirit of the Pacific Northwest. Vancouver, B.C., Canada: Ronsdale Press. ISBN 978-1-55380-060-6.
  • Will, Gudrun. "Cascadia Rising." Vancouver Review, 2006.
  • Woodward, Steve. "Welcome to Cascadia" The Oregonian, 14 November 2004.
  • "Welcome to Cascadia." The Economist, 5/21/94, Vol. 331, Issue 7864

External links