DisplayPort: Difference between revisions
cleanup, clarify, remove unnecessary repetitions Tag: references removed |
|||
Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
}} |
}} |
||
'''DisplayPort''' is a digital display interface developed |
'''DisplayPort''' is a digital display interface developed by the [[VESA|Video Electronics Standards Association]] (VESA). The VESA DisplayPort specification is [[royalty-free]] and is designed to replace [[Video Graphics Array|VGA]], [[Digital Visual Interface|DVI]], and [[Low-voltage differential signaling|LVDS]], but not [[High-Definition Multimedia Interface|HDMI]]. |
||
⚫ | |||
The first version, 1.0, was approved by VESA on May 3, 2006.<ref name="launch">{{cite web|title=New DisplayPort(TM) Interface Standard for PCs, Monitors, TV Displays and Projectors Released by the Video Electronics Standards Association|date=3 May 2006|publisher=vesa.org|accessdate=21 July 2011|archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20090214160316/http://www.vesa.org/press/VESA_dportlaunchpr_Final.htm|archivedate=14 February 2009}}</ref> 1.1a was approved on April 2, 2007<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.geek.com/articles/gadgets/displayport-the-new-video-interconnect-standard-20070730/|title=DisplayPort: The new video interconnect standard|last=Hodgin|first=Rick|date=30 July 2007|publisher=geek.com|accessdate=21 July 2011}}</ref> followed by the current standard 1.2 on December 22, 2009.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.geek.com/articles/chips/displayport-1-2-enables-full-4k-x-2k-resolution-3d-stereo-beyond-full-hd-and-more-20100118/|title=DisplayPort 1.2 enables full 4K x 2K resolution, 3D stereo beyond full HD, and more|last=Zibreg|first=Christian|date=18 January 2010|publisher=Geek.com|accessdate=21 July 2011}}</ref> |
The first version, 1.0, was approved by VESA on May 3, 2006.<ref name="launch">{{cite web|title=New DisplayPort(TM) Interface Standard for PCs, Monitors, TV Displays and Projectors Released by the Video Electronics Standards Association|date=3 May 2006|publisher=vesa.org|accessdate=21 July 2011|archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20090214160316/http://www.vesa.org/press/VESA_dportlaunchpr_Final.htm|archivedate=14 February 2009}}</ref> 1.1a was approved on April 2, 2007<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.geek.com/articles/gadgets/displayport-the-new-video-interconnect-standard-20070730/|title=DisplayPort: The new video interconnect standard|last=Hodgin|first=Rick|date=30 July 2007|publisher=geek.com|accessdate=21 July 2011}}</ref> followed by the current standard 1.2 on December 22, 2009.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.geek.com/articles/chips/displayport-1-2-enables-full-4k-x-2k-resolution-3d-stereo-beyond-full-hd-and-more-20100118/|title=DisplayPort 1.2 enables full 4K x 2K resolution, 3D stereo beyond full HD, and more|last=Zibreg|first=Christian|date=18 January 2010|publisher=Geek.com|accessdate=21 July 2011}}</ref> |
||
== Overview == |
== Overview == |
||
⚫ | DisplayPort protocol relies on packetized [[data transmission]] which is found in technologies like [[Ethernet]], [[USB]], and [[PCI Express]]. The DisplayPort connector supports 1, 2, or 4 differential data pairs (lanes) in a Main Link, each with a raw bit rate of 1.62, 2.7, or 5.4 Gbit/s per lane with self-clock running at 162, 270, or 540 MHz. Data is [[8b/10b encoding|8b/10b encoded]] where each 8 bits of information are encoded with a 10 bit symbol. The effective data rates after decoding are 1.296, 2.16, and 4.32 Gbit/s per lane (or 80% of the total). |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | Unlike legacy standards such as DVI, HDMI and LVDS, where some differential pairs are fixed to transmitting a clock signal and separate pairs are dedicated to RGB or YUV [[channel (digital image)|color channel]] data, the DisplayPort protocol is based on small [[data packet]]s known as ''micro packets'' in the standard, which embed the clock signal within the data stream. <ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-ati-eyefinity,2567-6.html|title=AMD's Eyefinity Technology Explained|date=February 28, 2010|publisher=TomsHardware.com|accessdate=23 January 2012}}</ref> The use of data packets allows DisplayPort to be extensible and scalable, meaning additional features can be added over time without significant changes to the interface itself, and variable number of differential pairs means that performance can easily scale with additional lanes.<ref name="extremetech">{{cite web|url=http://www.extremetech.com/computing/84094-an-inside-look-at-displayport-v12|title=An Inside Look at DisplayPort v1.2|date=4 February 2011|publisher=ExtremeTech|accessdate=28 July 2011}}</ref> |
||
DisplayPort supports both internal and external display connections, i.e. can be used as a connection to an external [[display device]] such as a [[computer monitor]] or [[television set]], or as an internal link to the display panel in high-resolution monitors and televisions.<ref name="ICCE">{{cite web|url=http://www.vesa.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/ICCE-Presentation-on-VESA-DisplayPort.pdf|title=DisplayPort Technical Overview|date=January 10, 2011|publisher=VESA.org|accessdate=23 January 2012}}</ref> |
|||
⚫ | Displayport can |
||
⚫ | Displayport can transmit audio and video simultaneously, although both streams are optional and each can be transmitted without the other. The video packet supports 6 to 16 bits per [[channel (digital image)|color channel]], and the audio packet supports up to 8 channels of 24 bit 192 kHz uncompressed [[PCM]] audio, which can encapsulate compressed audio formats in the audio stream.<ref name=CEA2010/> A bi-directional, half-duplex auxiliary channel carries device management and device control data for the Main Link, such as VESA [[Extended display identification data|EDID]], [[Monitor Control Command Set|MCCS]], and [[VESA Display Power Management Signaling|DPMS]] standards, as well as bi-directional [[USB]] data.<ref name="tomshardware">{{cite web|url=http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-eyefinity-6-displayport,2596-5.html|title=The Case For DisplayPort, Continued, And Bezels|date=15 April 2010|publisher=Tom's Hardware|accessdate=28 July 2011}}</ref> |
||
⚫ | The DisplayPort signal is not compatible with [[Digital Visual Interface|DVI]] or [[High-Definition Multimedia Interface|HDMI]]. |
||
⚫ | The DisplayPort signal is not compatible with [[Digital Visual Interface|DVI]] or [[High-Definition Multimedia Interface|HDMI]]. However dual-mode ports (marked with a DP++ logo) will transmit a [[Digital Visual Interface#Single-link DVI|single-link]] DVI or HDMI signal when they detect that an external passive adapter is attached. [[VGA]] and [[Digital Visual Interface#Dual-link DVI|dual-link]] DVI require powered active adapters, which do not require dual-mode DisplayPorts (see [[#Compatibility with HDMI, DVI and VGA|compatibility with HDMI, DVI and VGA]]). |
||
<!-- The following paragraph is should either be deleted or moved to the tech specs section --> |
|||
⚫ | The DisplayPort connector supports 1, 2, or 4 differential data pairs (lanes) in a Main Link, each with a raw bit rate of 1.62, 2.7, or 5.4 Gbit/s per lane with self-clock running at 162, 270, or 540 MHz. Data is [[8b/10b encoding|8b/10b encoded]] where each 8 bits of information are encoded with a 10 bit symbol. |
||
== Versions == |
== Versions == |
||
Line 105: | Line 104: | ||
''Embedded DisplayPort'' (eDP) 1.0 standard was adopted in December 2008. It aims to define a standardized display panel interface for internal connections; e.g., graphics cards to notebook display panels.<ref name="eDP11a">{{cite web|url=http://www.displayport.org/news-presentations/press-releases/eDPpr.pdf|title=Embedded DisplayPort Standard Ready from VESA|publisher=VESA|date=2009-02-23}}{{dead link|date=February 2011}}</ref> It supports advanced power-saving features including seamless refresh rate switching. Version 1.1 was approved in October 2009 followed by version 1.1a in November 2009. Version 1.2 was approved in May 2010 and supports DisplayPort 1.2 data rates, 120 Hz [[sequential color]] monitors, and a new display panel control protocol that works through the AUX channel.<ref name=DevCon2010/> Version 1.3 was published in February 2011; it includes a new Panel Self-Refresh (PSR) feature developed to save system power and further extend battery life in portable PC systems.<ref>[http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20110207005402/en/VESA-%C2%AE-Issues-Updated-Embedded-DisplayPort%C2%AE-Standard VESA ® Issues Updated Embedded DisplayPort® Standard | Business Wire<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> PSR mode allows GPU to enter power saving state in between frame updates by including [[framebuffer]] memory in the display panel controller.<ref name=DevCon2010/> |
''Embedded DisplayPort'' (eDP) 1.0 standard was adopted in December 2008. It aims to define a standardized display panel interface for internal connections; e.g., graphics cards to notebook display panels.<ref name="eDP11a">{{cite web|url=http://www.displayport.org/news-presentations/press-releases/eDPpr.pdf|title=Embedded DisplayPort Standard Ready from VESA|publisher=VESA|date=2009-02-23}}{{dead link|date=February 2011}}</ref> It supports advanced power-saving features including seamless refresh rate switching. Version 1.1 was approved in October 2009 followed by version 1.1a in November 2009. Version 1.2 was approved in May 2010 and supports DisplayPort 1.2 data rates, 120 Hz [[sequential color]] monitors, and a new display panel control protocol that works through the AUX channel.<ref name=DevCon2010/> Version 1.3 was published in February 2011; it includes a new Panel Self-Refresh (PSR) feature developed to save system power and further extend battery life in portable PC systems.<ref>[http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20110207005402/en/VESA-%C2%AE-Issues-Updated-Embedded-DisplayPort%C2%AE-Standard VESA ® Issues Updated Embedded DisplayPort® Standard | Business Wire<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> PSR mode allows GPU to enter power saving state in between frame updates by including [[framebuffer]] memory in the display panel controller.<ref name=DevCon2010/> |
||
''Direct Drive Monitor'' 1.0 standard was approved in December 2008. It allows for controller-less monitors where the display panel is directly driven by the DisplayPort signal, although the supported resolutions and color depth are limited to 2-lane operation. |
''Direct Drive Monitor'' (DDM) 1.0 standard was approved in December 2008. It allows for controller-less monitors where the display panel is directly driven by the DisplayPort signal, although the supported resolutions and color depth are limited to 2-lane operation. |
||
''Internal DisplayPort'' (iDP) 1.0 was approved in April 2010. The iDP standard defines an internal link between a digital TV [[system on a chip]] controller and the display panel's timing controller. It aims to replace currently used internal [[LVDS]] lanes with DisplayPort connection.<ref name="iDP">{{cite web|url=http://www.displayport.org/cms/sites/default/files/downloads/press-releases/iDP_VESA_PR.pdf|title=VESA Issues Internal DisplayPort Standard for Flat Panel TVs|publisher=VESA|date=2010-05-10}}</ref> iDP features unique physical interface and protocols, which are not directly compatible with DisplayPort and are not applicable to external connection, however they enable very high resolution and refresh rates while providing simplicity and extensibility.<ref name=DevCon2010/> iDP features non-variable 2.7 GHz clock and is nominally rated at 3.24 Gbit/s data rate per lane, with up to 16 lanes in a ''bank'', resulting in 6-fold decrease in wiring requirements over [[LVDS]] for a 1080p24 signal;<ref name="CEA2010"/> other data rates are also possible. iDP was built with simplicity in mind and it doesn't support AUX channel, content protection, or multiple streams; however it does support frame sequential and line interleaved stereo 3D.<ref name=DevCon2010/> |
''Internal DisplayPort'' (iDP) 1.0 was approved in April 2010. The iDP standard defines an internal link between a digital TV [[system on a chip]] controller and the display panel's timing controller. It aims to replace currently used internal [[LVDS]] lanes with DisplayPort connection.<ref name="iDP">{{cite web|url=http://www.displayport.org/cms/sites/default/files/downloads/press-releases/iDP_VESA_PR.pdf|title=VESA Issues Internal DisplayPort Standard for Flat Panel TVs|publisher=VESA|date=2010-05-10}}</ref> iDP features unique physical interface and protocols, which are not directly compatible with DisplayPort and are not applicable to external connection, however they enable very high resolution and refresh rates while providing simplicity and extensibility.<ref name=DevCon2010/> iDP features non-variable 2.7 GHz clock and is nominally rated at 3.24 Gbit/s data rate per lane, with up to 16 lanes in a ''bank'', resulting in 6-fold decrease in wiring requirements over [[LVDS]] for a 1080p24 signal;<ref name="CEA2010"/> other data rates are also possible. iDP was built with simplicity in mind and it doesn't support AUX channel, content protection, or multiple streams; however it does support frame sequential and line interleaved stereo 3D.<ref name=DevCon2010/> |
||
Line 114: | Line 113: | ||
== Specifications == |
== Specifications == |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | DisplayPort 1.0 includes optional ''DPCP'' (DisplayPort Content Protection) from [[Philips]], which uses 128-bit [[Advanced Encryption Standard|AES]] encryption. It also features full authentication and session key establishment (each encryption session is independent). There is an independent revocation system. This portion of the standard is licensed separately. It also adds support for verifying the proximity of the receiver and transmitter, a technique intended to ensure users are not bypassing the content protection system to send data out to distant, unauthorized users. |
||
⚫ | |||
=== Technical specifications === |
=== Technical specifications === |
||
* Forward link channel with 1 to 4 lanes; effective data rate 1.296, 2.16, or 4.32 Gbit/s per lane (total 5.184, 8.64, or 17.28 Gbit/s for a 4-lane link)<sup>†</sup>. |
* Forward link channel with 1 to 4 lanes; effective data rate 1.296, 2.16, or 4.32 Gbit/s per lane (total 5.184, 8.64, or 17.28 Gbit/s for a 4-lane link)<sup>†</sup>. |
||
Line 155: | Line 149: | ||
|colspan=5| <small>For RGB and YCbCr 4:4:4 encodings, bpp = 3 × bpc (bits per channel); for YCbCr [[Chroma subsampling|4:2:2 subsampling]], bpp = 2 × bpc.</small> |
|colspan=5| <small>For RGB and YCbCr 4:4:4 encodings, bpp = 3 × bpc (bits per channel); for YCbCr [[Chroma subsampling|4:2:2 subsampling]], bpp = 2 × bpc.</small> |
||
|} |
|} |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | DisplayPort 1.0 includes optional ''DPCP'' (DisplayPort Content Protection) from [[Philips]], which uses 128-bit [[Advanced Encryption Standard|AES]] encryption. It also features full authentication and session key establishment (each encryption session is independent). There is an independent revocation system. This portion of the standard is licensed separately. It also adds support for verifying the proximity of the receiver and transmitter, a technique intended to ensure users are not bypassing the content protection system to send data out to distant, unauthorized users. |
||
⚫ | |||
== Comparisons == |
== Comparisons == |
||
Line 187: | Line 186: | ||
''Dual-mode DisplayPort'' can directly emit single-link [[HDMI]] and [[Digital Visual Interface|DVI]] signals using a simple passive adapter that adjusts for the lower voltages required by DisplayPort.<ref name="dpfaq">{{Cite news|title=DisplayPort FAQ |publisher=DisplayPort website |url=http://www.displayport.org/consumer/?q=content/faq |accessdate=2008-06-19}}</ref><ref name=DP_Interop>{{Cite news|title=DisplayPort Interoperability Guideline Version 1.1a|publisher=VESA.org |url=http://www.displayport.org |date=2009-02-05 |accessdate=2010-07-02}}</ref> When dual-mode chipset detects that a DVI or HDMI passive adapter is attached, it switches to DVI/HDMI mode which uses the 4-lane main DisplayPort link and the AUX channel link to transmit 3 TMDS signals, a Clock signal and [[Display Data Channel]] data/clock. Dual-mode ports are marked with the DP++ logo; most current DisplayPort graphics cards and monitors support this mode.<ref name=CEA2010/> |
''Dual-mode DisplayPort'' can directly emit single-link [[HDMI]] and [[Digital Visual Interface|DVI]] signals using a simple passive adapter that adjusts for the lower voltages required by DisplayPort.<ref name="dpfaq">{{Cite news|title=DisplayPort FAQ |publisher=DisplayPort website |url=http://www.displayport.org/consumer/?q=content/faq |accessdate=2008-06-19}}</ref><ref name=DP_Interop>{{Cite news|title=DisplayPort Interoperability Guideline Version 1.1a|publisher=VESA.org |url=http://www.displayport.org |date=2009-02-05 |accessdate=2010-07-02}}</ref> When dual-mode chipset detects that a DVI or HDMI passive adapter is attached, it switches to DVI/HDMI mode which uses the 4-lane main DisplayPort link and the AUX channel link to transmit 3 TMDS signals, a Clock signal and [[Display Data Channel]] data/clock. Dual-mode ports are marked with the DP++ logo; most current DisplayPort graphics cards and monitors support this mode.<ref name=CEA2010/> |
||
A notable limitation is that dual-mode can only transmit single-link DVI/HDMI, as the number of pins in the DisplayPort connector is insufficient for dual-link connections; an active converter is needed for Dual-Link DVI (and analog [[component video]] such as [[VGA]], since it employs [[digital to analog conversion]]). Active conversion can be powered by +3.3 V wire in the DisplayPort connector, but some active adapters require external |
A notable limitation is that dual-mode can only transmit single-link DVI/HDMI, as the number of pins in the DisplayPort connector is insufficient for dual-link connections; an active converter is needed for Dual-Link DVI (and analog [[component video]] such as [[VGA]], since it employs [[digital to analog conversion]]). Active conversion can be powered by +3.3 V wire in the DisplayPort connector, but some active adapters require external power.<ref name="BizLink">{{cite web|url=http://www.bizlinktech.com/future_displayport.html|title=DisplayPort|publisher=BizLink|accessdate=27 July 2011}}</ref> |
||
VESA foresees that all HDMI and DVI conversion will eventually be handled by active adapters which act as DisplayPort Sink devices, in order to facilitate easier updates to latest HDMI and DisplayPort specs, and support dual-link HDMI,<ref name=CEA2010/> DisplayPort connections with fewer than 4 lanes or different data rates, and multiple DisplayPort streams. It should be noted that DVI 1.0 spec was finalized in 1999 and the DVI industry consortium has since disbanded, so future updates to DVI specification are unlikely; also, although dual-link HDMI ''Type B'' connector is defined in the HDMI specification, it has not seen any practical use as of 2012. |
VESA foresees that all HDMI and DVI conversion will eventually be handled by active adapters which act as DisplayPort Sink devices, in order to facilitate easier updates to latest HDMI and DisplayPort specs, and support dual-link HDMI,<ref name=CEA2010/> DisplayPort connections with either fewer than 4 lanes or different data rates, and multiple DisplayPort streams. It should be noted that DVI 1.0 spec was finalized in 1999 and the DVI industry consortium has since disbanded, so future updates to DVI specification are unlikely; also, although dual-link HDMI ''Type B'' connector is defined in the HDMI specification, it has not seen any practical use as of 2012. |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
{{anchor|Advantages over legacy standards}} |
|||
The current DisplayPort specification allows the interface to [[Interoperability|interoperate]] with [[HDMI]]. When an external DisplayPort-to-HDMI cable adapter is attached to a dual-mode DisplayPort, the interface configures itself to transmit only HDMI compliant signals which allows for high-definition audio and video with [[HDCP]], a form of digital copy protection.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://hackipedia.org/Hardware/video/connectors/DisplayPort/VESA%20DisplayPort%20Interoperability%20Guideline%20v1.1.pdf|title=VESA DisplayPort Interoperability Guideline Version 1.1|publisher=VESA|accessdate=23 January 2012}}</ref> Even with this added functionality, DisplayPort is only expected to complement HDMI, which already has a foothold in the [[consumer electronics]] industry, particularly within [[home cinema]].<ref name="Direct2Dell_DPvsHDMI"/><ref name="dpfaq"/> In addition, most of DisplayPort's [[#Adopters and supporters|supporters]] are computer companies including Apple, Dell, HP, Lenovo, Fujitsu, Toshiba and Acer - some of which have released computer monitors that support DisplayPort as well as HDMI.<ref>{{Cite news|title=Dell's 3008WFP {{convert|30|in|mm|sing=on}}-inch LCD with DisplayPort sneaks available -- in US too |publisher=engadget |url=http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/18/dells-3008wfp-30-inch-lcd-with-displayport-sneaks-available/ |author=Paul Miller |date=2007-12-18 |accessdate=2008-06-18}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|title=Dell's {{convert|24|in|mm|sing=on}}-inch 2408WFP monitor with DisplayPort (and everything else) now available |publisher=engadget |url=http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/17/dells-24-inch-2408wfp-monitor-with-displayport-and-everything/ |author=Thomas Ricker |date=2008-01-17 |accessdate=2008-06-18}}</ref> |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | DisplayPort |
||
⚫ | |||
{{Cleanup-list|date=November 2010}} |
{{Cleanup-list|date=November 2010}} |
||
In December 2010 it was announced that several computer vendors and display makers including Intel, AMD, Dell, Lenovo, Samsung and LG would begin phasing out support for LVDS, VGA and DVI-I over the next few years moving forward with developing technologies DisplayPort and HDMI as their replacements.<ref name="technewsworld1">[http://www.technewsworld.com/story/VGA-Given-5-Years-to-Live-71420.html technewsworld.com] - ''VGA Given 5 Years to Live'' (9. December 2010)</ref><ref>[http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2374034,00.asp?kc=PCRSS03069TX1K0001121 Top PC, Chip, Display Makers to Ditch VGA, DVI | News & Opinion | PCMag.com |
In December 2010 it was announced that several computer vendors and display makers including Intel, AMD, Dell, Lenovo, Samsung and LG would begin phasing out support for LVDS, VGA and DVI-I over the next few years moving forward with developing technologies DisplayPort and HDMI as their replacements.<ref name="technewsworld1">[http://www.technewsworld.com/story/VGA-Given-5-Years-to-Live-71420.html technewsworld.com] - ''VGA Given 5 Years to Live'' (9. December 2010)</ref><ref>[http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2374034,00.asp?kc=PCRSS03069TX1K0001121 Top PC, Chip, Display Makers to Ditch VGA, DVI | News & Opinion | PCMag.com]</ref>. One notable exception to the list of manufacturers is Nvidia, who has yet to announce any plans regarding future support of legacy interfaces. |
||
{{Quote box |
{{Quote box |
||
Line 221: | Line 214: | ||
** Long-distance transmission over alternative physical media such as optical fiber (version 1.1a) |
** Long-distance transmission over alternative physical media such as optical fiber (version 1.1a) |
||
* Supports high resolution displays and multiple displays with a single cable |
* Supports high resolution displays and multiple displays with a single cable |
||
** 17.28 Gbit/s of effective video bandwidth, enough for supporting 4 simultaneous 1080p60 displays (CEA-861 timings) or 2,560 × 1,600 × 30 bit @120 Hz (CVT-R timings)<ref group="note">Dual-link DVI is limited in resolution and speed by the quality and therefore the bandwidth of the DVI cable, the quality of the transmitter, and the quality of the receiver; can only drive one monitor at a time; and cannot send audio data. HDMI 1.3 and 1.4 are limited |
** 17.28 Gbit/s of effective video bandwidth, enough for supporting 4 simultaneous 1080p60 displays (CEA-861 timings) or 2,560 × 1,600 × 30 bit @120 Hz (CVT-R timings)<ref group="note">Dual-link DVI is limited in resolution and speed by the quality and therefore the bandwidth of the DVI cable, the quality of the transmitter, and the quality of the receiver; can only drive one monitor at a time; and cannot send audio data. HDMI 1.3 and 1.4 are limited to effectively 8.16 Gbit/s or 340 MHz (though actual devices are limited to 225-300 MHz), and can only drive one monitor at a time. [[VGA connector]]s have no defined maximum resolution or speed, but their analog nature limits their bandwidth.</ref> |
||
* Designed to support internal chip-to-chip communication |
* Designed to support internal chip-to-chip communication |
||
** Aimed at replacing internal [[Low-voltage differential signaling|LVDS]] links to display panels with a unified link interface |
** Aimed at replacing internal [[Low-voltage differential signaling|LVDS]] links to display panels with a unified link interface |
||
Line 232: | Line 225: | ||
** Can be used for transmitting bi-directional USB, touch-panel data, CEC, etc. |
** Can be used for transmitting bi-directional USB, touch-panel data, CEC, etc. |
||
* Self-latching connector |
* Self-latching connector |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | Although DisplayPort supports much of the same functionality as [[High-Definition Multimedia Interface|HDMI]], it is expected to complement the HDMI interface, not replace it.<ref name="dpfaq">{{Cite news|title=DisplayPort FAQ |publisher=DisplayPort website |url=http://www.displayport.org/consumer/?q=content/faq |accessdate=2008-06-19}}</ref><ref name="Direct2Dell_DPvsHDMI">[http://en.community.dell.com/dell-blogs/direct2dell/b/direct2dell/archive/2008/02/19/46464.aspx Direct2Dell Blog: The Truth About DisplayPort vs. HDMI]</ref> DisplayPort can emit HDMI video and audio using passive adapters connected to [[#Compatibility with DVI and HDMI|Dual-mode ports]], and supports HDCP content protection used in the HDMI standard. |
||
Most of DisplayPort's [[#Adopters and supporters|supporters]] are computer companies including Apple, Dell, HP, Lenovo, Fujitsu, Toshiba and Acer, which intend DisplayPort to replace DVI, VGA and LVDS in their computers and monitors. |
|||
⚫ | DisplayPort is currently royalty free, while the HDMI royalty is 4 cents per device and has an annual fee of $10,000 for high volume manufacturers.<ref>{{Cite news|title=HDMI Adopter Terms |publisher=HDMI.org |url=http://www.hdmi.org/manufacturer/terms.aspx |accessdate=2008-06-23}} HDMI Licensing counters by claiming that "royalty-free" does not necessarily mean free, and that the DisplayPort specification makes it possible to request compensation from any entity that implements the technology.<ref>{{Cite news|title=Interview with Steve Venuti from HDMI Licensing|publisher=HDMI Licensing LLC. |url=http://www.hdmi.org/pdf/2009_10_Veritas_Visus_Venuti_Interview.pdf}}</ref> DisplayPort has more than twice the bandwidth with up to 21.6 Gbit/s<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.anandtech.com/show/4563/zotac-releases-displayport-to-dual-hdmi-adapter|title=Zotac releases DisplayPort to dual HDMI adapter|date=August 2, 2011|publisher=Anandtech.com|accessdate=23 January 2012}}</ref> (17.28 Gbits/s with overhead removed) as opposed to HDMI's 10.2 Gbits/s<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.hdmi.org/learningcenter/overview.aspx|title=HDMI 1.3 Overview|publisher=HDMI.org|accessdate=23 January 2012}}</ref> (8.16 Gbits/s with overhead removed), and can share this bandwidth with multiple streams of video and audio to separate devices.<ref name="HDMIvsDP" /> |
||
⚫ | DisplayPort in native mode lacks some features present in HDMI, such as support for the [[xvYCC]] color space (added in DisplayPort version 1.2) and [[Consumer Electronics Control]] (CEC) commands, which allow to control multiple devices through a single remote;<ref>{{Cite news|title=HDMI Specification 1.3a |publisher=HDMI Licensing, LLC. |url=http://www.hdmi.org |date=2006-11-10 |accessdate=2008-06-21}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|title=DisplayPort 1.1a Standard |publisher=VESA.org |url=http://www.displayport.org |date=2008-01-11 |accessdate=2008-06-23}}</ref> VESA asserts that CEC commands can be transmitted over the AUX channel if needed.<ref name=CEA2010/><ref name="HDMIvsDP">{{cite web|url=http://www.differencebetween.net/technology/difference-between-hdmi-and-displayport/|title=HDMI vs DisplayPort|publisher=differencebetween.net|accessdate=23 January 2012}}</ref> HDMI uses unique Vendor Specific Block structure which allows for specific features such as additional color spaces, however these can be defined by [[Extended display identification data#CEA EDID Timing Extension Version 3 data format|CEA EDID extensions]]. |
||
== Products == |
== Products == |
Revision as of 21:59, 28 January 2012
Type | Digital audio/video connector | ||
---|---|---|---|
Production history | |||
Designer | VESA | ||
Designed | May 2006 | ||
Produced | 2008–present | ||
General specifications | |||
Hot pluggable | Yes | ||
External | Yes | ||
Audio signal | Optional; 1–8 channels, 16 or 24-bit linear PCM; 32 to 192 kHz sampling rate; maximum bitrate 49,152 kbit/s (6MB/s) | ||
Video signal | Optional, maximum resolution limited by available bandwidth | ||
Cable |
3 meters for full bandwidth transmission over passive cable. 33 meters over active cable.[1] | ||
Pins | 20 pins for external connectors on desktops, notebooks, graphics cards, monitors, etc. and 30/20 pins for internal connections between graphics engines and built-in flat panels. | ||
Electrical | |||
Signal | +3.3 V | ||
Max. voltage | 16.0 V | ||
Max. current | 500 mA | ||
Data | |||
Data signal | Yes | ||
Bitrate | 1.62, 2.7, or 5.4 Gbit/s data rate per lane; 1, 2, or 4 lanes; (effective total 5.184, 8.64, or 17.28 Gbit/s for 4-lane link); 1 Mbit/s or 720 Mbit/s for the auxiliary channel. | ||
Protocol | Mini-packet | ||
Pinout | |||
External connector (source-side) on PCB | |||
Pin 1 | ML_Lane 0 (p) | Lane 0 (positive) | |
Pin 2 | GND | Ground | |
Pin 3 | ML_Lane 0 (n) | Lane 0 (negative) | |
Pin 4 | ML_Lane 1 (p) | Lane 1 (positive) | |
Pin 5 | GND | Ground | |
Pin 6 | ML_Lane 1 (n) | Lane 1 (negative) | |
Pin 7 | ML_Lane 2 (p) | Lane 2 (positive) | |
Pin 8 | GND | Ground | |
Pin 9 | ML_Lane 2 (n) | Lane 2 (negative) | |
Pin 10 | ML_Lane 3 (p) | Lane 3 (positive) | |
Pin 11 | GND | Ground | |
Pin 12 | ML_Lane 3 (n) | Lane 3 (negative) | |
Pin 13 | CONFIG1 | connected to Ground1) | |
Pin 14 | CONFIG2 | connected to Ground1) | |
Pin 15 | AUX CH (p) | Auxiliary Channel (positive) | |
Pin 16 | GND | Ground | |
Pin 17 | AUX CH (n) | Auxiliary Channel (negative) | |
Pin 18 | Hot Plug | Hot Plug Detect | |
Pin 19 | Return | Return for Power | |
Pin 20 | DP_PWR | Power for connector (3.3 V 500 mA) | |
|
DisplayPort is a digital display interface developed by the Video Electronics Standards Association (VESA). The VESA DisplayPort specification is royalty-free and is designed to replace VGA, DVI, and LVDS, but not HDMI.
The first version, 1.0, was approved by VESA on May 3, 2006.[2] 1.1a was approved on April 2, 2007[3] followed by the current standard 1.2 on December 22, 2009.[4]
Overview
DisplayPort protocol relies on packetized data transmission which is found in technologies like Ethernet, USB, and PCI Express. The DisplayPort connector supports 1, 2, or 4 differential data pairs (lanes) in a Main Link, each with a raw bit rate of 1.62, 2.7, or 5.4 Gbit/s per lane with self-clock running at 162, 270, or 540 MHz. Data is 8b/10b encoded where each 8 bits of information are encoded with a 10 bit symbol. The effective data rates after decoding are 1.296, 2.16, and 4.32 Gbit/s per lane (or 80% of the total).
Unlike legacy standards such as DVI, HDMI and LVDS, where some differential pairs are fixed to transmitting a clock signal and separate pairs are dedicated to RGB or YUV color channel data, the DisplayPort protocol is based on small data packets known as micro packets in the standard, which embed the clock signal within the data stream. [5] The use of data packets allows DisplayPort to be extensible and scalable, meaning additional features can be added over time without significant changes to the interface itself, and variable number of differential pairs means that performance can easily scale with additional lanes.[6]
DisplayPort supports both internal and external display connections, i.e. can be used as a connection to an external display device such as a computer monitor or television set, or as an internal link to the display panel in high-resolution monitors and televisions.[7]
Displayport can transmit audio and video simultaneously, although both streams are optional and each can be transmitted without the other. The video packet supports 6 to 16 bits per color channel, and the audio packet supports up to 8 channels of 24 bit 192 kHz uncompressed PCM audio, which can encapsulate compressed audio formats in the audio stream.[8] A bi-directional, half-duplex auxiliary channel carries device management and device control data for the Main Link, such as VESA EDID, MCCS, and DPMS standards, as well as bi-directional USB data.[9]
The DisplayPort signal is not compatible with DVI or HDMI. However dual-mode ports (marked with a DP++ logo) will transmit a single-link DVI or HDMI signal when they detect that an external passive adapter is attached. VGA and dual-link DVI require powered active adapters, which do not require dual-mode DisplayPorts (see compatibility with HDMI, DVI and VGA).
Versions
1.0 to 1.1
DisplayPort 1.0 supports a maximum of 8.64 Gbit/s data rate over a 2 meter cable.[10] DisplayPort 1.1 also supports devices which implement alternative link layers such as fiber optic, allowing a much longer reach between source and display without signal degradation,[11] although alternative implementations are not standardized. It also supports HDCP in addition to DisplayPort Content Protection (DPCP).
1.2
DisplayPort version 1.2 was approved on December 22, 2009. The most significant improvement of the new version is the doubling of the effective bandwidth to 17.28 Gbit/s, which allows increased resolutions, higher refresh rates, and greater color depth. Other improvements include multiple independent video streams (daisy-chain connection with multiple monitors), support for stereoscopic 3D, increased AUX channel bandwidth (from 1 Mbit/s to 720 Mbit/s), support for more color spaces including xvYCC, scRGB and Adobe RGB 1998, and Global Time Code (GTC) for sub 1 µs audio/video synchronisation. Also Apple Inc.'s Mini DisplayPort connector, which is much smaller and more appropriate for laptop computers and other small devices, is compatible with the new standard.[12][13][14][8][15]
Companion standards
Mini DisplayPort (mDP) is a standard announced by Apple in the fourth quarter of 2008. Shortly after announcing the Mini DisplayPort, Apple announced that it would license the connector technology with no fee. The following year, in early 2009, VESA announced that Mini DisplayPort would be included in the upcoming DisplayPort 1.2 specification.
Embedded DisplayPort (eDP) 1.0 standard was adopted in December 2008. It aims to define a standardized display panel interface for internal connections; e.g., graphics cards to notebook display panels.[16] It supports advanced power-saving features including seamless refresh rate switching. Version 1.1 was approved in October 2009 followed by version 1.1a in November 2009. Version 1.2 was approved in May 2010 and supports DisplayPort 1.2 data rates, 120 Hz sequential color monitors, and a new display panel control protocol that works through the AUX channel.[15] Version 1.3 was published in February 2011; it includes a new Panel Self-Refresh (PSR) feature developed to save system power and further extend battery life in portable PC systems.[17] PSR mode allows GPU to enter power saving state in between frame updates by including framebuffer memory in the display panel controller.[15]
Direct Drive Monitor (DDM) 1.0 standard was approved in December 2008. It allows for controller-less monitors where the display panel is directly driven by the DisplayPort signal, although the supported resolutions and color depth are limited to 2-lane operation.
Internal DisplayPort (iDP) 1.0 was approved in April 2010. The iDP standard defines an internal link between a digital TV system on a chip controller and the display panel's timing controller. It aims to replace currently used internal LVDS lanes with DisplayPort connection.[18] iDP features unique physical interface and protocols, which are not directly compatible with DisplayPort and are not applicable to external connection, however they enable very high resolution and refresh rates while providing simplicity and extensibility.[15] iDP features non-variable 2.7 GHz clock and is nominally rated at 3.24 Gbit/s data rate per lane, with up to 16 lanes in a bank, resulting in 6-fold decrease in wiring requirements over LVDS for a 1080p24 signal;[8] other data rates are also possible. iDP was built with simplicity in mind and it doesn't support AUX channel, content protection, or multiple streams; however it does support frame sequential and line interleaved stereo 3D.[15]
Portable Digital Media Interface (PDMI) is an interconnection between docking stations/display devices and portable media players, which includes 2-lane DisplayPort v1.1a connection.[8] It has been ratified in February 2010 as ANSI/CEA-2017-A.
Wireless DisplayPort is a standard which will enable DisplayPort 1.2 bandwidth and feature set for cable-free applications operating in 60 GHz radio band; this was announced on November 2010 by WiGig Alliance and VESA as a cooperative effort.[19]
Specifications
Technical specifications
- Forward link channel with 1 to 4 lanes; effective data rate 1.296, 2.16, or 4.32 Gbit/s per lane (total 5.184, 8.64, or 17.28 Gbit/s for a 4-lane link)†.
- 8b/10b encoding provides DC-balancing and Embedded Clock within serial channel (10 bit symbols, 20% coding overhead)
- Supports RGB (unspecified) and YCbCr (ITU-R BT.601-5 and BT.709-4) color spaces, 4:4:4 and 4:2:2 chroma subsampling
- sRGB, Adobe RGB 1998, DCI-P3, RGB XR, scRGB, xvYCC, Y-only, Simple Color Profile (version 1.2) [15]
- Supports color depth of 6, 8, 10, 12 and 16 bits per color component
- Optional 8-channel audio with sampling rates up to 24 bit 192 kHz, supports encapsulation of audio compression formats
- Bidirectional half-duplex AUX channel, 1 Mbit/s (v1.0) or optional 720 Mbit/s (v1.2)
- Supports stereoscopic 3D formats: frame sequential (v1.1a), field sequential, side-by-side, top-bottom, line interleaved, pixel interleaved and dual interface (v1.2) [15]
- Optional dual-mode support generates TMDS and clock for single-link DVI/HDMI signaling with a simple line-level conversion dongle.[8]
- Supports up to 63 video and audio streams with time-division transport multiplexing and hot-plug bandwidth allocation (from version 1.2)
- 128-bit AES DisplayPort Content Protection (DPCP) support, and support for 40-bit High-bandwidth Digital Content Protection (HDCP) from version 1.1 onwards.
- Supports internal and external connections so that one standard can be used by computer makers reducing costs.[20]
Resolution × color depth @ frame rate | CVT | CVT-R | CEA-861-E | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1280 × 720 × 24 bpp @ 60 Hz | 1.79 | 1.54 | 1.78 | |
1920 × 1080 × 24 bpp @ 60 Hz | 4.15 | 3.33 | 3.56 | |
1920 × 1200 × 30 bpp @ 60 Hz | 5.81 | 4.62 | - | |
2560 × 1600 × 30 bpp @ 60 Hz | 10.46 | 8.06 | - | |
3840 × 2160 × 30 bpp @ 60 Hz | 21.39 | 16.00 | - | |
For RGB and YCbCr 4:4:4 encodings, bpp = 3 × bpc (bits per channel); for YCbCr 4:2:2 subsampling, bpp = 2 × bpc. |
DRM
DisplayPort 1.0 includes optional DPCP (DisplayPort Content Protection) from Philips, which uses 128-bit AES encryption. It also features full authentication and session key establishment (each encryption session is independent). There is an independent revocation system. This portion of the standard is licensed separately. It also adds support for verifying the proximity of the receiver and transmitter, a technique intended to ensure users are not bypassing the content protection system to send data out to distant, unauthorized users.
DisplayPort 1.1 added support for industry-standard 56-bit HDCP (High-bandwidth Digital Content Protection) revision 1.3, which has been compromised in September 2010 with the release of HDCP master key.
Comparisons
Compatibility with HDMI, DVI and VGA
DisplayPort pins | DVI 1.0/HDMI mode |
---|---|
Main Link Lane 0 | TMDS Channel 2 |
Main Link Lane 1 | TMDS Channel 1 |
Main Link Lane 2 | TMDS Channel 0 |
Main Link Lane 3 | TMDS Clock |
AUX CH+ | DDC Clock |
AUX CH- | DDC Data |
DP_PWR | DP_PWR |
Hot Plug Detect | Hot Plug Detect |
Config 1 | Cable Adaptor Detect |
Config 2 | CEC (HDMI only) |
Dual-mode DisplayPort can directly emit single-link HDMI and DVI signals using a simple passive adapter that adjusts for the lower voltages required by DisplayPort.[21][22] When dual-mode chipset detects that a DVI or HDMI passive adapter is attached, it switches to DVI/HDMI mode which uses the 4-lane main DisplayPort link and the AUX channel link to transmit 3 TMDS signals, a Clock signal and Display Data Channel data/clock. Dual-mode ports are marked with the DP++ logo; most current DisplayPort graphics cards and monitors support this mode.[8]
A notable limitation is that dual-mode can only transmit single-link DVI/HDMI, as the number of pins in the DisplayPort connector is insufficient for dual-link connections; an active converter is needed for Dual-Link DVI (and analog component video such as VGA, since it employs digital to analog conversion). Active conversion can be powered by +3.3 V wire in the DisplayPort connector, but some active adapters require external power.[23]
VESA foresees that all HDMI and DVI conversion will eventually be handled by active adapters which act as DisplayPort Sink devices, in order to facilitate easier updates to latest HDMI and DisplayPort specs, and support dual-link HDMI,[8] DisplayPort connections with either fewer than 4 lanes or different data rates, and multiple DisplayPort streams. It should be noted that DVI 1.0 spec was finalized in 1999 and the DVI industry consortium has since disbanded, so future updates to DVI specification are unlikely; also, although dual-link HDMI Type B connector is defined in the HDMI specification, it has not seen any practical use as of 2012.
Advantages over DVI, VGA and LVDS
This article may contain unverified or indiscriminate information in embedded lists. (November 2010) |
In December 2010 it was announced that several computer vendors and display makers including Intel, AMD, Dell, Lenovo, Samsung and LG would begin phasing out support for LVDS, VGA and DVI-I over the next few years moving forward with developing technologies DisplayPort and HDMI as their replacements.[24][25]. One notable exception to the list of manufacturers is Nvidia, who has yet to announce any plans regarding future support of legacy interfaces.
Legacy interfaces such as VGA, DVI and LVDS have not kept pace, and newer standards such as DisplayPort and HDMI clearly provide the best connectivity options moving forward. In our opinion, DisplayPort 1.2 is the future interface for PC monitors, along with HDMI 1.4a for TV connectivity.
AMD, Dell, Intel Corporation, Lenovo, Samsung Electronics and LG. Dec 8, 2010.[26]
DisplayPort has several advantages over VGA, DVI and LVDS.
- Open[citation needed] (except HDCP), royalty-free and extensible standard to help broad adoption
- Fewer lanes with embedded self-clock, reduced EMI with data scrambling and spread spectrum mode
- Based on a micro-packet protocol
- Allows easy expansion of the standard with multiple data types
- Flexible allocation of available bandwidth between audio and video
- Multiple video streams over single physical connection (version 1.2)
- Long-distance transmission over alternative physical media such as optical fiber (version 1.1a)
- Supports high resolution displays and multiple displays with a single cable
- 17.28 Gbit/s of effective video bandwidth, enough for supporting 4 simultaneous 1080p60 displays (CEA-861 timings) or 2,560 × 1,600 × 30 bit @120 Hz (CVT-R timings)[note 1]
- Designed to support internal chip-to-chip communication
- Aimed at replacing internal LVDS links to display panels with a unified link interface
- Compatible with low-voltage signaling used with sub-nanometer CMOS fabrication
- Can drive display panels directly, eliminating scaling and control circuits and allowing for cheaper and slimmer displays
- Link training with adjustable amplitude and preemphasis adapts to differing cable lengths and signal quality
- Reduced bandwidth transmission for 15 meter cable (at least 1920x1080p60, 24 bpp)
- Full bandwidth transmission for 2 meter cable
- High-speed auxiliary channel for DDC, EDID, MCCS, DPMS, HDCP, adapter identification etc. traffic
- Can be used for transmitting bi-directional USB, touch-panel data, CEC, etc.
- Self-latching connector
Comparison with HDMI
Although DisplayPort supports much of the same functionality as HDMI, it is expected to complement the HDMI interface, not replace it.[21][27] DisplayPort can emit HDMI video and audio using passive adapters connected to Dual-mode ports, and supports HDCP content protection used in the HDMI standard.
Most of DisplayPort's supporters are computer companies including Apple, Dell, HP, Lenovo, Fujitsu, Toshiba and Acer, which intend DisplayPort to replace DVI, VGA and LVDS in their computers and monitors.
DisplayPort is currently royalty free, while the HDMI royalty is 4 cents per device and has an annual fee of $10,000 for high volume manufacturers.Cite error: A <ref>
tag is missing the closing </ref>
(see the help page). DisplayPort has more than twice the bandwidth with up to 21.6 Gbit/s[28] (17.28 Gbits/s with overhead removed) as opposed to HDMI's 10.2 Gbits/s[29] (8.16 Gbits/s with overhead removed), and can share this bandwidth with multiple streams of video and audio to separate devices.[30]
DisplayPort in native mode lacks some features present in HDMI, such as support for the xvYCC color space (added in DisplayPort version 1.2) and Consumer Electronics Control (CEC) commands, which allow to control multiple devices through a single remote;[31][32] VESA asserts that CEC commands can be transmitted over the AUX channel if needed.[8][30] HDMI uses unique Vendor Specific Block structure which allows for specific features such as additional color spaces, however these can be defined by CEA EDID extensions.
Products
Since its introduction in 2006, DisplayPort has slowly gained popularity within the computer industry, and as of 2010, DisplayPort connectors are featured on many graphic cards, displays, and notebook computers.
ATI/AMD
AMD Graphics Product Group (former ATI Technologies) was the first company to release consumer products with a DisplayPort beginning with their 790G chipset and Radeon HD 2000 series graphics cards. The first were unveiled at AMD's Technology Analyst Day on July 25, 2007. AMD later implemented the DisplayPort on the GPU chip in Radeon HD 3600 and HD 3400 graphics products, unveiled at AMD Financial Analyst Day on 13 December 2007. These products received DisplayPort certification from VESA in March 2008.[33]
In 2008, DisplayPort connectors were featured on many graphics cards based on the ATI/AMD HD 4000 series. In 2009, the HD 5000 series graphics cards incorporated a DisplayPort connector as a standard feature, along with two Dual-link DVI connectors and a HDMI connector. The Eyefinity versions can carry up to six Mini DisplayPort connectors.[34] Support for DisplayPort audio was introduced by AMD in the Catalyst 9.12 hotfix.[35]
As of February 2011, the latest HD 6000 series graphics cards feature support for DisplayPort 1.2, allowing daisy-chaining multiple monitors from the same connector. A DisplayPort hub containing three Dual-link DVI connectors is also available.
Apple
On 14 October 2008, Apple introduced several products featuring a Mini DisplayPort[36] as the sole video connector. This connector was proprietary at that time. Later, with versions 1.1a and 1.2 of the specification, it became part of the standard. Between October 2009 and February 2011, all Mac models feature Mini DisplayPort connector; during that time iMac, MacBook, MacBook Air, MacBook Pro, and Xserve models used Mini DisplayPort as their sole video output while the Mac Mini and Mac Pro models had both a Mini DisplayPort and either a DVI port (Mac Pro) or an HDMI port (Mac Mini). On February 24, 2011 MacBook Pros began shipping with Thunderbolt (known previously by Intel codename Light Peak) which provides both DisplayPort and PCI Express functionality in a single port. On May 3, 2011 Apple introduced their first iMac lineup with Thunderbolt built in. The iMac 21 in (53 cm) received one and the iMac 27 in (69 cm) received two Thunderbolt ports.
Apple's 24 in (61 cm) and 27 in (69 cm) LED Cinema Displays feature Mini DisplayPort connector. The 27-inch iMac introduced in 2009 allowed the Mini DisplayPort to act as an input, turning the iMac into a standalone display.[37] 2011 iMacs support this 'Target Display Mode' via the Thunderbolt port, but only when the source is also equipped with Thunderbolt.[38]
Dell
A concept monitor by Dell implementing DisplayPort was demonstrated in early May 2007.[39]
The Dell 3008WFP 30-inch (76 cm), released in January 2008 was the first monitor to support DisplayPort.[40][41] The Dell 2408WFP 24-inch (61 cm) followed in April 2008.[42] Many other Dell monitors also offer the DisplayPort interface, including four of their 'Professional' series and five of their 'UltraSharp' series monitors.[43]
Hewlett Packard
The HP Elite L2201 21.5-inch (55 cm) released in June 2011 is the first monitor from Hewlett Packard to ship with a DisplayPort as the primary (and only) means of connectivity.[44] HP EliteBook laptops provide both a VGA and a DisplayPort connector.
Lenovo
Lenovo offers DisplayPort connectors on some models.
Adopters and supporters
The following companies have participated in preparing the drafts of DisplayPort, eDP, iDP, or DDM standards:
- Agilent
- Altera
- AMD Graphics Product Group
- Analogix[45]
- Apple
- Astrodesign
- Broadcom Corporation
- Chi Mei Optoelectronics
- Chrontel[46]
- Dell
- Display Labs
- Foxconn Electronics
- Genesis Microchip [47]
- Hewlett-Packard
- Hosiden
- Hirose Electric Group
- Intel
- I-PEX
- Integrated Device Technology
- JAE Electronics
- Kawasaki Microelectronics (K-Micro)
- Lenovo
- LG Display
- Luxtera
- Molex
- NEC
- NVIDIA
- NXP Semiconductors
- Parade Technologies
- Realtek Semiconductor
- Samsung [48]
- SMK
- STMicroelectronics
- SyntheSys Research Inc.
- Tektronix
- Texas Instruments
- TLi
- Tyco Electronics
- ViewSonic
- VTM
The following companies have additionally announced their intention to implement or support DisplayPort, eDP or iDP:
- Acer
- ASRock[49]
- Biostar
- Chroma
- Circuit Assembly
- DataPro
- Eizo
- Fujitsu
- Gigabyte Technology
- Hall Research Technologies
- ITE Tech.
- Matrox Graphics
- Micro-Star International[50]
- MStar Semiconductor
- Palit Microsystems Ltd.
- Pioneer Corporation
- S3 Graphics
- Toshiba
- Philips
- Quantum Data
- Sparkle Computer
- Unigraf
Market share
Figures from IDC show that DisplayPort was on 5.1 percent of commercial desktops and 2.1 percent on commercial notebooks in 2009. However, they predict that the figure for commercial desktops will grow to 89.5 percent, and for commercial notebooks to 95 percent by 2014.[24] The main factor behind this is the phase out of VGA, and that both Intel and AMD will also stop supporting low-voltage differential signaling (LVDS), by 2013.
See also
Notes
- ^ Dual-link DVI is limited in resolution and speed by the quality and therefore the bandwidth of the DVI cable, the quality of the transmitter, and the quality of the receiver; can only drive one monitor at a time; and cannot send audio data. HDMI 1.3 and 1.4 are limited to effectively 8.16 Gbit/s or 340 MHz (though actual devices are limited to 225-300 MHz), and can only drive one monitor at a time. VGA connectors have no defined maximum resolution or speed, but their analog nature limits their bandwidth.
References
- ^ O'Brian, Terrence (22 June 2011). "DisplayPort 1.2 adds active cable support: brings longer cords, more logos". Engadget. Retrieved 10 July 2011.
- ^ "New DisplayPort(TM) Interface Standard for PCs, Monitors, TV Displays and Projectors Released by the Video Electronics Standards Association". vesa.org. 3 May 2006.
{{cite web}}
:|access-date=
requires|url=
(help);|archive-url=
requires|url=
(help); Missing or empty|url=
(help) - ^ Hodgin, Rick (30 July 2007). "DisplayPort: The new video interconnect standard". geek.com. Retrieved 21 July 2011.
- ^ Zibreg, Christian (18 January 2010). "DisplayPort 1.2 enables full 4K x 2K resolution, 3D stereo beyond full HD, and more". Geek.com. Retrieved 21 July 2011.
- ^ "AMD's Eyefinity Technology Explained". TomsHardware.com. February 28, 2010. Retrieved 23 January 2012.
- ^ "An Inside Look at DisplayPort v1.2". ExtremeTech. 4 February 2011. Retrieved 28 July 2011.
- ^ "DisplayPort Technical Overview" (PDF). VESA.org. January 10, 2011. Retrieved 23 January 2012.
- ^ a b c d e f g h "DisplayPort Technical Overview, May 2010" (PDF). VESA. 2010-05-23.
- ^ "The Case For DisplayPort, Continued, And Bezels". Tom's Hardware. 15 April 2010. Retrieved 28 July 2011.
- ^ Thomas Ricker (2007-01-03). "DisplayPort to support HDCP, too". Engadget. Retrieved 2007-12-22.
- ^ "Video Electronics Standards Association (VESA) Endorses Alternative to Copper Cables". Luxtera Inc. 2007-04-17. Retrieved 2010-01-19.
- ^ Tony Smith, "DisplayPort revision to get mini connector, stereo 3D", The Register, 13 January 2009
- ^ "WinHEC 2008 GRA-583: Display Technologies". Microsoft. 2008-11-06.
- ^ "CES 2009 Press Event" (PDF). VESA. 2009-01-11.[dead link]
- ^ a b c d e f g DisplayPort® Developer Conference Presentations Posted | vesa
- ^ "Embedded DisplayPort Standard Ready from VESA" (PDF). VESA. 2009-02-23.[dead link]
- ^ VESA ® Issues Updated Embedded DisplayPort® Standard | Business Wire
- ^ "VESA Issues Internal DisplayPort Standard for Flat Panel TVs" (PDF). VESA. 2010-05-10.
- ^ Wireless Gigabit Alliance » » WiGig™ Alliance and VESA® to Collaborate on Next Generation Wireless DisplayPort
- ^ DisplayPort/DVI/HDMI Comparison table, VESA DisplayPort Standard v1.0—Audioholics Home Theater Reviews and News.
- ^ a b "DisplayPort FAQ". DisplayPort website. Retrieved 2008-06-19.
- ^ "DisplayPort Interoperability Guideline Version 1.1a". VESA.org. 2009-02-05. Retrieved 2010-07-02.
- ^ "DisplayPort". BizLink. Retrieved 27 July 2011.
- ^ a b technewsworld.com - VGA Given 5 Years to Live (9. December 2010)
- ^ Top PC, Chip, Display Makers to Ditch VGA, DVI | News & Opinion | PCMag.com
- ^ [1]
- ^ Direct2Dell Blog: The Truth About DisplayPort vs. HDMI
- ^ "Zotac releases DisplayPort to dual HDMI adapter". Anandtech.com. August 2, 2011. Retrieved 23 January 2012.
- ^ "HDMI 1.3 Overview". HDMI.org. Retrieved 23 January 2012.
- ^ a b "HDMI vs DisplayPort". differencebetween.net. Retrieved 23 January 2012.
- ^ "HDMI Specification 1.3a". HDMI Licensing, LLC. 2006-11-10. Retrieved 2008-06-21.
- ^ "DisplayPort 1.1a Standard". VESA.org. 2008-01-11. Retrieved 2008-06-23.
- ^ {{cite news|url=http://www.amd.com/us/press-releases/Pages/Press_Release_124353.aspx%7Ctitle=AMD Receives First Ever DisplayPort™ Certification for PC Graphics|date=March 19[[Citation needed|, 2008|publisher=AMD|accessdate=23 January 2012}}
- ^ "ATI Radeon HD 5870 1GB Graphics Card and AMD Eyefinity Review". PC Perspective. 2009-09-23. Retrieved 2009-09-23.
- ^ . AMD http://support.amd.com/us/kbarticles/Pages/ATICatalyst912Hotfix.aspx. Retrieved 2009-12-18.
{{cite news}}
: Missing or empty|title=
(help) - ^ "Software Licensing and Trademark Agreement: Mini DisplayPort".
- ^ Arya, Aayush (25 November 2009). "Apple posts guidelines on 27-inch iMac's Target Display mode". Macworld.com. Retrieved 3 December 2011.
- ^ "iMac Target Display Mode does not work with Mini DisplayPort cable". Apple. Retrieved 3 December 2011.
- ^ "Dell Shows Off Super-Slim Display Port LCD Monitor". Gearlog.com. 2007-05-17. Retrieved 2007-07-16.
- ^ Dell 3008WFP specifications[dead link]. Retrieved 2008-01-30. Archived 2008-01-17 at the Wayback Machine[dead link]
- ^ "Dell UltraSharp 3008WFP 30-Inch LCD Monitor". The Washington Post. Retrieved 2008-06-25.
- ^ "Dell UltraSharp 2408WFP". The New York Times. Retrieved 2008-06-25.
- ^ "List of Devices from the DisplayPort Website". DisplayPort Official Website.
- ^ [2]
- ^ Analogix announces DisplayPort transmitter[dead link], published 2006-08-26, seen 2009-08-10
- ^ http://www.chrontel.com
- ^ "Genesis Microchip (GNSS) Q4 2006 Earnings Conference Call". Seeking Alpha. 2006-05-02. Retrieved 2007-07-16.
- ^ "Samsung touts development of first DisplayPort desktop LCD". TG Daily. 2006-07-25. Retrieved 2007-07-25.
- ^ ASRock announces motherboard with embedded DisplayPort[dead link], published 2008-03-25, seen 2009-08-10
- ^ MSI announces video adaptor with DisplayPort[dead link], published 2008-01-17, seen 2009-08-10