Help talk:Media (audio and video)

HOW-TO: Find all the Ogg files on Wikipedia

Now that you know how to play Ogg files, either Vorbis, Theora or Speex, you might want to know where to find files to play. Wikipedia offers a vast list in this page, most of them under the Public Domain. You might also want to check the Commons data base.

Furthermore, you may want to offer your help to Wikipedia by creating Spoken versions of its articles using either the Vorbis format or Speex.

--Saoshyant ^{talk / contribs} 15:13, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Links to this page

Can I suggest that this page is linked as standard to all the ogg media files pages? I have been using wikipedia for 6 months but have never used an audio/video file because i had no idea how to make my computer play them. In the end i had to search externally on google to find this page--84.12.21.104 00:33, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

Every article that uses any ogg audio/video is supposed to use the audio or video template, both of which link prominently to this page. How were you getting to our media without encoutering the template? Raul654 02:25, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

Real player removed

Yes, RealPlayer stinks. But it's still some people's favourite media player. I reckon we should still list this as an OGG player on Wikipedia:Media help, even if we put a warning up there as to some of the criticisms. It's a fact that some people stick like glue to their choices of media player. I believe it's better to allow people to choose RealPlayer than lead them to believe that RealPlayer doesn't support OGG, which isn't true. I reckon that there may also be NPOV issues with leaving RealPlayer off there. TreveX^talk 15:46, 23 September 2005 (UTC) {Copied from user page User talk:Raul654 TreveX^talk 09:59, 26 September 2005 (UTC)}

I've removed Real Player from this list. TreveX asked me a couple days ago on my talk page about this, but (with the main page pruning) I've been distracted until now. Real player is a truely awful program. TreveX said he thought that making this subjective choice could be a violation of the NPOV policy, but he is incorrect - the NPOV policy applies to articles, not Wikipedia pages. I've gone ahead and removed it. →Raul654 22:04, 25 September 2005 (UTC)

Perhaps NPOV doesn't apply here, but this was an aside to my main argument. You evidently feel quite strongly that RealPlayer isn't very good. Other users may feel differently, however. The purpose of this page is to explain to users how they can play media on Wikipedia, a number of options are given in order that users can make the choice most appropriate to them. RealPlayer's presence on this page is simply about giving users of Wikipedia the opportunity to make a free choice based on the fact that RealPlayer is capable of handling Vorbis and Theora files. To leave RealPlayer off is extremely patronising to users: "we think RealPlayer is rubbish, so we're not going to tell you how to play OGG files using it". I happen to agree with you that RealPlayer isn't particularly great, but why force users who use RealPlayer and are happy with it to change to another player simply because we don't like it? Restored. TreveX^talk 09:59, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

I've used all available video players and Real is my favourite. Dan100 (Talk) 18:33, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

Certainly Real is notable enough to have a wiki article, and NPOV/POV shoudguide content there. But in terms of putting together a 'help' guide that 'helps' viewers access audio information, pointing them towards RealPlayer is really at cross-purposes. The install has so many steps, and the subtle opt-out and registration steps at least skirt the line of malware. More advanced users can certainly search the web and find it for themselves, but in terms of Wikipedia guiding a basic user towards how to setup audio files. I'd recommend removing RealPlayer.Cander0000 (talk) 18:37, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Winamp?

Where is Winamp? I can't tell how many use it, but there was a time that it was one of the most popular audio/media players. And it has native ogg support. — mark ✎ 14:08, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

"It is highly recommended that you use a program which is capable of playing both Ogg Vorbis and Ogg Theora files. The reason is that both types files use the same file extension, namely .ogg. Programs which can only play Ogg Vorbis files, such as Winamp, will still attempt to load video (Ogg Theora) files but will fail to play them." →Raul654 14:12, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

Ah, I missed that one. — mark ✎ 14:27, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

Currently Winamp is not limited to playing audio files. As far as I know it was possible to play video in Winamp for at least one year. --213.142.200.101 07:29, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

True, but it's not, insofar as we have been able to determine, capable of playing ogg theora files. →Raul654 17:25, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

We could always e-mail them and ask, and if the answer is no, we could send in a reply requesting that feature. Too bad AFAIK admins like Raul don't get @wikipedia.org email addresses, they should allow that :-) --unforgettableid | talk to me 07:48, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Winamp play ogg Theora !!! http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Media_help --adrruiz \^(talk) 13:46, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Winamp can't play wiki's .ogg files on my computer, even after installing xiph.org's ogg codec. don't know if it blamed to vista64 or something else. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nekosp (talk • contribs) 16:30, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Confusing

This page is too confusing. My mom could not follow the instructions. How can we make the instructions easy enough for my mom? --unforgettableid | talk to me 07:45, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

• I agree. There are too many options. — Jeremy | Talk 01:18, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• I agree too.. The should be one option per platform. Is it really necessary to link to several closed-source players? --Tomhannen 13:40, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
• I agree three. It also seems kind of spammy. We might as well just direct people to vorbis.com's setup page, which is much clearer. My suggestion would be to have that, a link to Wikimedia's cross platform plugin, and a link to Comparison of media players and THAT'S IT. --Karnesky 02:22, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
• I agree four. Someone needs to write an installer which automatically installs java and the codec, and does everything that is neccessary to make it work. Most people just can't be bothered going through such a long list of commands to watch a video. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.72.0.195 (talk) 19:46, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
• Step 2, which takes you to some programmer's jerk-off page, is especially misleading and seems to be unnecessary. Patrick Neylan (talk) 18:26, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Special:Playmedia

Also, could we make a page called, um, let's say, Special:Playmedia with <embed> tags that cause Firefox to automatically download an appropriate player, just like Firefox does now with Flash for users who don't have the Flash plugin yet? --unforgettableid | talk to me 07:45, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Playing Ogg files in iTunes

Would it be worth including instructions to install the Xiph.org QuickTime components, which should allow the playback of Ogg files in iTunes? I'm asking, rather than just adding it to the page, because it's not an official addon from Apple, and hence it's possible that it'll be broken by Apple at a future update of iTunes. Mike Peel 03:28, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

User:Raul654 seems to be reverting all edits that put this into the page. The reason given is that only software which can play both the audio and video versions of Ogg should be listed. I would disagree with this - I use iTunes for audio playback, and VLC for video playback, and only half the help for this setup is available here.

I would propose that we list methods for getting Wikipedia content to work in as many mainstream programs as possible (by 'mainstream' I mean used by a reasonable amount of people). We're not making recommendations here, as that's biased; we're providing help for users. Whether the program is capable of playing audio, or video, or both should be mentioned at the top of the instructions for that software. Mike Peel 12:13, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia contains both ogg vorbis and ogg theora (and is, to my knowledge, the only site on the internet that does so). Due to a profoundly bad decision on their part - to use the same extension, .ogg, for both, operating systems will default to a single program to play both. We will *not* be listing players here that can only play half of these, because that will only lead to complaints from viewers that they followed the instructions and couldn't play a certain file. Raul654 16:37, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for the explaination. Mike Peel 18:05, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

As of XiphQT 0.1.5, iTunes can play both Vorbis audio and Theora video fine, as I have tested on Mac OS X. It should also work fine on Windows, but as I do not have a Windows computer to test with, I'm only going to be re-adding the guide for iTunes for Mac OS X for now. On a related note, since any QuickTime player (and there are a dozen or so on the Mac) can use these components, maybe it should be written like the DirectShow entry for Windows, or GStreamer for Linux? But the only other QuickTime player I can think of that's worth linking to is NicePlayer... --Dicey 08:04, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Time For Downloads

Instead of saying 'this should take about X minutes on 56k connection (which is becoming increasingly rare now; even in NZ, which has some of the worst internet connectivity in the world, many people now have good broadband), why don't we just say how big the file is? This would allow people to make the simple deduction themselves how fast it would take, depending on their highly variable internet connections.

I also don't like that less than 2 minutes has been bolded for WMP, it looks more like an ad from MS than a wikipedia article like that.

Saving

Okay, I can now play Ogg files, but how can I save other files as them? --OGoncho 07:13, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

You need an Ogg Vorbis encoder (or an Ogg Theora encoder if you want to encode video). I just use oggenc but you'll probably be more comfortable with something like Audacity. —Keenan Pepper 13:03, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. --OGoncho 21:17, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

CDex (Windows) and abcde (Linux) also support creating ogg files. I have found them easier to use for this purpose than Audacity. --Geekdog 13:35, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Recommended Players

For reference, j^ on IRC #theora says on 28--Sept--2006:

GChriss: Wikipedia:Media help (Ogg) <-- Is this page complete and up to par?

j^: or os x it should list http://xiph.org/quicktime/

j^: oh it does under itunes, confusing

j^: and mplayer sure is not the number one choice, quicktime or VLC are

GChriss: j^: mind if I quote you on that? the page doesn't make a recommendation per se, but it would be fine on the talk page

j^: you can quote me sure, the order was suggesting a recommendation to me

j^: oh and it should be Ogg not OGG

j^: all over

GChriss <always listening><c> 16:55, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

So, HOW do I play OGG files?

I've never been able to get these audio files to work. I click on the pronunciation link, the file downloads, but my computer can't find the proper player, and when I click "search the internet for the appropriate program" I just get a page that loads blank. When I click "download programs" on the help link next to pronunciation I just get a list of players that either I already have or seem redundant to what I already have. I just don't get what I'm supposed to do. CClio333 02:56, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Follow the instructions on this page. Raul654 16:17, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Could you be more specific? Do you mean the Media Help (Ogg) page? Because nothing on that page addresses my problem. CClio333 21:20, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Look for step 7 under the Windows tutorial. Does it help?--Saoshyant ^{talk / contribs} (I don't like Wikipedophiles) 11:00, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Plan 9 from Bell Labs

I don't suppose there are many Plan 9 users out there, but could there be some information on how to play Vorbis/Theora in Plan 9. Oh, and maybe Haiku too?--Ivo Emanuel Gonçalves/Saoshyant ^{talk / contribs} 10:39, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Interesting software, but is the number of users at least three digits? It wouldn't make much sense to include the instructions otherwise. Thanks, GChriss <always listening><c> 17:21, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Plan 9? Probably much more than 100 people. Haiku? Not so much.--Saoshyant ^{talk / contribs} (I don't like Wikipedophiles) 11:01, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

If you're using that OS (either of them), you probably already know what you're doing, and don't need this page. Bawolff 20:18, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Broken link / bandwidth

The link http://www.illiminable.com/ogg/ on the Ogg Media help page does not work anymore.

Yes, I think the domain name expired. Is there any alternate way to be able to play Ogg files? (Other than installing an alternate player, that is) Thanks, Am00nz0r5 20:17, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

The site is back. For future reference, if it ever goes down Windows users can check the DefilerPak (or find a mirror of illi's work).--Saoshyant ^{talk / contribs} (I don't like Wikipedophiles) 15:00, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Link is down due to bandwidth issues. There really must be another source for Ogg Codecs; can WP not host something itself? (I'm not sure about other users, but "hellninjacommando" doesn't instill a great deal of confidence in me - but then neither does a website suffering bandwidth overuse.) ozNoz (talk) 19:42, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Well, bandwidth isn't free and nobody is selling a product to get spare money to pay for all the bandwidth. I need to talk with the site's owner so he tries to set some mirror system. Also, scratch my earlier recommendation for DefilerPak. It's outdated and includes support for non-free formats, which is a no-no in Wikipedia et al. While the illiminable site doesn't come back online, you may want to try install VLC, or simply install Java and use the built-in player in the Ogg pages across Wikipedia et al.--Ivo Emanuel Gonçalves ^{talk / contribs} (join WP:PT) 22:08, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Sample Video Post on Wikipedia

Can someone please send me a link to a video posted on Wikipedia?

I've been looking for the last 20 minutes, and I cannot seem to find a sample of this Ogg video format.

Please help.

Thanks, Kyle

I've uploaded a few hundred to commons. See Komodo dragon, for example. Raul654 16:32, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

MPlayer Windows GUI

The Windows version of MPlayer now has a GUI. I'll update the page accordingly. Now that a command line is not required, I'll remove the references to advanced users who are familiar with command line usage.

Help Me

I've done everything this page asks of me, but I'm still unable to play ogg files. I get an error message when I try to open one. I've downloaded the coddec and everything, uninstalled it, reinstalled it...Please leave a message on my page. --Criticalthinker 10:35, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Going Too Fast

I've been using the Mac OS X version of the Ogg player on files from the Homestar Runner Wiki (my username there is Brightstar Shiner) and it works perfectly fine, except that when I play the spoken article files, they play way too fast. I don't know why this is happening. Could someone please help me? Thanks in advance, -216.201.58.10 21:28, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Could you post a direct link to one of those files? I'm not a Mac OS X user, but I can check if there's a problem with the files. It's probably a bug on the player, though.--Saoshyant ^{talk / contribs} (please join WP:PT or WP:SPOKEN) 11:49, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

I can't really, but the time on it looks like this: -:--:--. Maybe I'm downloading it wrong. Anyway, don't worry about it; I'll figure it out for myself. Thanks anyway! -216.201.58.77 01:37, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

I just want to confirm that I have the same issue with MPlayer on OS X, with every Ogg Vorbis file I've tried to play (mostly pronunciations). Additionally, VLC truncates the beginning and end of the audio, which makes the pronunciation audio basically useless. I've also tried Democracy, but it's told me it can't play the files at all (which is odd, since I thought it used VLC's guts for a player). Afiler 19:26, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Afiler, would you plese fill a VLC bug report? This situation is pretty odd, and I do not want other users to suffer the same problem.--Saoshyant ^{talk / contribs} (please join WP:Portugal or WP:SPOKEN) 16:45, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

illiminable codec doesn't work

The codec here doesn't work for me.This one does. Perhaps we should use it as an alternative option, as I have followed the directions to the letter, and on several diffrent computers, but alas, the illiminable codec still doesn't work on them, yet every system I have used the other codec in has... The only problem I can see with this is 56k users, and users of Windows 9x. - 68.228.56.158 02:42, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

There's quite a bunch of ilegal and irrelevant crap in there. I do not recommend that codec pack for ANYONE. In case illi's pack does not work, look for ffmpeg.--Saoshyant ^{talk / contribs} (please join WP:Portugal or WP:SPOKEN) 16:45, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

How is any of it illegal? And while irrelevent, it is my favorite codec pack. ^^ - Thekittenofterra 18:13, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

VLC Firefox plugin for Windows is unreliable

The VLC firefox plugin for windows will not play short OGG audio files correctly. This is a huge problem in wikipedia and wiktionary, where you are often listening to short files. I couldn't find anything documenting this. Short files tend to get truncated upon playback. Any suggestions? --Tomhannen 13:40, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Go talk to the vlc people perhaps.( http://videolan.org ) Bawolff 20:15, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Should there be a link to this somewhere on the page? It was the only way I could find of getting them to stream correctly in Firefox. 82.32.116.76 10:51, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

I simply want to upload a recording! HELP - how to make an ogg

Can anyone please help me...

I have made a recording which I wish to upload. However, Wikipedia is rejecting my MP3. I guess I have to make an ogg.

Can someone recommend a GOOD, FREE program to use for this? I have tried two already: one was 6MB and required registration (otherwise it only encoded half the file!) and the other did not work at all (I forgot their names now: I simply deleted them).

Please recommend a program to me. A small one, preferably - which simply performs its task, to run a wav file through a codec.

Thanks.

EuroSong ^talk 14:07, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

You can simply go to the official Vorbis web site and see what's available there, in the encoding section:

http://www.vorbis.com/setup_windows/

oggenc is the original encoding utility by Xiph.org, so you can't go wrong with that. Also, the purpose of Wikipedia talk pages is discussing the article — the way it's written and the how to improve it. It's not a general discussion forum. —J. M. 15:53, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the suggestion, J. M.. By the way, I am well aware of the rôle of talk pages: that's exactly why I am asking this question here - because this information should be in the article itself. As it stands, there is not a single mention of the words "encode" or "create" within the article. And since ogg files are Wikipedia's format of choice, then it should be natural that this page - entitled "Media help (Ogg)" is the most obvious page on which to provide users a guide to creating these files! The fact that I had to ask the question here surely serves to highlight this glaring omission from the project page. Anyway - thanks again for the info. EuroSong ^talk 18:10, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

For help making oggs, see Wikipedia:Media Raul654 16:04, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Editing sound files

Anyone willing to help edit four sound file interviews for Wikinews and Wikipedia's use? -- Zanimum 20:41, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Please reply to my talk page, if you're interested. I'm looking for multiple volunteers, so that there's less work for each person individually. -- Zanimum 16:23, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Democracy Player name change to Miro

I've changed all references for Democracy Player to Miro since this is now the name of the product. Sp0ng 05:13, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Be frustrated. Be very frustrated.

I have tried to get Wiki audio and video files to work on seven PCs now. All were running XP. They ranged from old machines to brand new clean installs. Even following the instructions on this page to the letter and installing the latest versions of everything, NONE of them have ever been able to play Wiki media content.

I can only assume that the drive for "open source" file formats is merely an attempt to ensure that no-one other than the greatest Unix Über-gurus ever see any of the supposed rich Wiki content.

Come on guys, get with the program and start using file formats that *real* people use. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.109.99.145 (talk • contribs)

Unfortunately a change of formats is not an option, or at least not a change that will be brought about easily. If you want help getting media files to play on your computer, please contact me on my talk page or by email. It will be useful for everyone if we can figure out which part of these instructions are confusing and then modify them accordingly. -SCEhardT 19:44, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Where can I go for help? I've followed the instructions to download and install the Windows codec on an XP PC. I can't get it to associate the .ogg filetype with the correct application. The Iliminable "program" in the Start/AllPrograms menu only has two options: uninstall and 'oggcodecs website' -- I can't find a program called DirectShow. N2e (talk) 21:25, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Reply is on your talk page -SCEhardT 22:54, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Sound samples

Is it just my browser, or does anyone else notice that the sound samples are ill-shaped within the page, and protrudes unto the written text of the article? Is anyone working on this, please? It's been like this for a while. Orane (talk) 19:21, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Here's a screenshot of the Celine Dion page. Look how the samples disrupt the text.

Here's a screenshot of the Mariah Carey page. Look how the samples extend too far right, and you have to scroll over to see them.

Can you point out an example? The buttons are ugly in a number of different ways, so it would be good to know which one you're interested in.. :) --Gmaxwell 20:02, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Well, in most of the article I've edited, the sound sample distorts the page. Look at Mariah Carey or Celine Dion for example. Orane (talk) 20:23, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

I'm more worried about browser detection, really. I never tested the new player, so I took the opportunity just now. Now this is interesting as it says I don't have any supported player. If I remember correctly from the description on how it works, it should have detected either Java or VLC on my system, right? If someone wants to take note, the player didn't work for _me_ on SeaMonkey, Linux, with Java and VLC installed. I'll try to look further into the issue just in case it's something weird on my side. Also of note is that my Swiftweasel browser (on the same platform) just crashed after hitting the play button.

Note that neither of those browsers support the <video>/<audio> element as of yet, so the only thing I was able to test was the "fallback".--Ivo Emanuel Gonçalves ^{talk / contribs} (join WP:PT) 21:34, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Are you sure you actually have Java and VLC installed? Check your about:plugins. The current support does detection somewhat differently than the old stuff, but as far as I can tell it works pretty widely. When you hit 'more' after hitting play it should list the supported playback modes. What is listed there?

"crashed after hitting play" sounds like VLC. The VLC plugin is crashy for some people (mostly on Linux with old copies of it..), so it's down ranked by default. --Gmaxwell 00:14, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Ah, yes. about:plugins reveals that my SeaMonkey does not have the VLC plugin installed. It does have Java, though. Shouldn't it have started the Cortado application? My Switfweasel however does have both installed, and VLC is the latest stable version. I wouldn't call it an "old copy".--Ivo Emanuel Gonçalves ^{talk / contribs} (join WP:PT) 15:09, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Has anyone discovered the issue with the sample? Is it just my browser? When I log out, the box is perfectly aligned, and there is no problem. However, if I log back in, then it becomes ill-shaped again :-( Orane (talk) 20:46, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

User ratings

The user ratings should be removed for the same reasons as Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Films/Style_guidelines#IMDB_User_Ratings. Chris Bainbridge 23:13, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Additional player for Windows

I would like to propose that foobar2000 is added as a player in the wikipedia list. It supports ogg natively. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chadders (talk • contribs) 12:46, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

foobar2000 supports Vorbis and Speex, but not Theora (the video part), making it not okay as a Wikipedia et al recommended player.--Ivo Emanuel Gonçalves ^{talk / contribs} (join WP:PT) 15:42, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

VLC

Can you tell me why is VLC the recommended player? I know, it is most likely the player available for most platforms but it does not play the OGG/Vorbis files well! It skips first second or two of the file and this means VLC is totally useless for short files like pronunciation examples. In VLC forum they say it's an internal issue of the player and it would be a "huge redesign to fix it". 89.176.252.135 (talk) 00:51, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

If you are part of the VLC community please insist as much as possible that they do redesign that part. Even the FSF is recommending the use of VLC to play Ogg video and audio so they better live up to everyone's expectations and deliver a good product. Why is VLC the recommended player? You have the answer: because it's available for pretty much every platform and also because a javascript library called mv_embed defaults to VLC if neither Java or HTML 5 <video> support are available. mv_embed is/will be used across the Wikimedia projects.--Ivo Emanuel Gonçalves ^{talk / contribs} (join WP:PT) 02:55, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

BUT IT DOES NOT WORK Installed "out of the box" VLC will not play ogg files for me! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.84.210.28 (talk) 17:02, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

How do I get Firefox to play a downloaded Ogg file?

My fully-updated Firefox browser on Windows XP plays ogg files fine on Wikipedia pages. But when I click on the downloaded file I get a popup window asking what to play it with. I can't get the Firefox browser to play it. I would like to use whatever Firefox is using to stream the ogg file.

Isn't the Firefox browser using Java plug-ins to play ogg music files? There is an ogg music file I can stream fine when I click the play button on this page:

• Portishead

[[:Image:Sour Times.ogg]]

The "more" info button goes to here:

• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Sour_Times.ogg

or it popups a menu with more options if the music clip has already been played. It lists the Cortado Java player as being the current selected player. It also offers QuickTime as an option. QuickTime could not play it.

I downloaded the ogg file from here:

• http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/0/05/Sour_Times.ogg

When I click the file, Sour_Times.ogg , I can't get the Firefox browser to play it. I don't want to install other players yet.

Where do I browse to in Windows to select the Cortado Java player? I am talking about when I click on the ogg file and the popup window asks what I want to use to open the ogg file with. --Timeshifter (talk) 08:41, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

--Timeshifter (talk) 16:14, 22 August 2008 (UTC) - I copied the following from Talk:Cortado (software):

You don't install Cortado; you install Java to make Cortado work on your browser. If you already downloaded the Ogg file (video or audio) then you can also play it on a real player like WMP. For WMP all you need is to install the DirectShow Ogg codecs. That's it. Don't over complicate it.--Ivo ^{talk / contribs} (join Project Portugal) 01:02, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

If it wasn't clear, Cortado is a player loaded from Wikimedia servers and works as a Java application to load the Ogg files in Wikimedia. You need to have Java installed, as well as enabled in Firefox (in case you or an extension disabled it).--Ivo ^{talk / contribs} (join Project Portugal) 01:05, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

thanks. So I guess my Firefox browser downloads the small Cortado application each time I click on a streaming Ogg file link on a web page. I will have to try to find the DirectShow Ogg codecs for Windows Media Player as you suggested. In order to play Ogg files offline. --Timeshifter (talk) 19:34, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

So it looks like already-downloaded OGG files require some extra effort to play. --Timeshifter (talk) 16:14, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Problem with Ogg files

Sometimes when I play .ogg music samples the play button seems to trigger the file to play twice, one slightly after the other creating a weird echo effect. If I click 'stop' one of the files stops playing but the other continues and sounds fine. This doesn't seem to be a problem with the files themselves as sometimes a particular file will be ok and sometimes it will 'double play'. Anyone else had similar issues? Cavie78 (talk) 12:12, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Oh, thank goodness it's not just me! I added a sound on Helium, and it does the same thing. --BlueNight (talk) 08:44, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

I just wanted to confirm that I get this problem with the VLC plugin (only with VLC) and it is 100% reproducible with specific files. Those that double-sound, such as Image:De-zwanzig.ogg and Image:Helium article read with helium.ogg, always double sound, while those that sound only once, such as Image:De-vierundzwanzig.ogg, always sound only once. (Using latest VLC version 0.9.6.) Below I have below requested a wanrning note be added to the Media help article. 84user (talk) 18:40, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Crashes Firefox

The embedded player crashes my Firefox 3.0.1 when I press the play button. The OS is Vista x64, and it says in about:plugins that I have Java Platform SE 6 U6. I don't have a VLC plugin, although I have VLC installed in the system. I've had similar problems on other PCs too, and just want to thank the ideologues who chose Vorbis and Theora as the standard formats for Wikipedia media files. Reinis^talk 05:03, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Illiminable

This site doesn't exist anymore and forwards to xiph. I think this page needs to be altered to reflect this. Rmhermen (talk) 16:22, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the tip; has been updated. -SCEhardT 17:26, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Burn the OGGs

OK, I've tried very, very hard. I've got a pretty clean new install of XP with Windows Media Player, Real Player, up-to-the-minute Java and so on. And I've followed the instructions to the letter for both Media Player and Real Player (and how confusing was that one, just being confrunted with a page full of gibberish links!). And still, and still, the OGG audio files won't play. Nada, nothing, zip.

In the introduction to media the Wikiguru clearly states that OGG files aren't playable by Windows or Mac operating systems - so that's well over 99% of the planet's computer users automatically and completely alienated.

Smart move, lads.

We had 'burn the GIFs' a few years ago. So now let's burn the OGGs. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.41.35.98 (talk) 20:45, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

No operating system can play Ogg files, because operating systems do not play files. Multimedia players do. So all you need to do is install a player or a component capable of Ogg/Vorbis playback (the article clearly links to several possible options). Also, please note that Wikipedia talk pages are not discussion forums or chatrooms, they only serve as a place for people to discuss the article and how to improve it. And please sign your comments and do not put your new section in the wrong place (the official Wikipedia guideline for talk page layout is: "Start new topics at the bottom of the page").—J. M. (talk) 21:13, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Please don't split hairs. When you buy a computer with an installed operating system such as Windows, the bundle includes media player software which is capable of playing common file types - except OGG. Most mere mortals consider that to be part of the operating system (as opposed to software that they have to find/buy separately).

I would argue that these comments are precisely intended to improve the article - and Wikipedia - by making media files accessible.

J.M. refers to the page clearly linking to several options. And completely misses the original poster's point that it doesn't work (at least for hir).

Thank you for your comment about signatures. I'm a registered user and a contributing author but I prefer to keep this comment anonymous. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.40.27.232 (talk) 19:13, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

The reason we use OGG is that it is one of the few open and royalty-free video formats about. With a non-free format users are at the mercy off the licence holders, if the licence holder does not wish to support a particular platform then that leaves the uses of that platform stuffed. Problems with OGG are technical ones, which can be fixed, rather than legal ones, which cannot.

If your still stuck, go to http://www.xiph.org/dshow/ download, run, and you should be done. --Salix alba (talk) 21:23, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

1. Comments intended to improve the article say what exactly is wrong with it and possibly suggest how to change it. While comments like "Smart move, lads" or "let's burn the OGGs" are just useless rants that do not belong here. You don't improve an article explaining how to play Ogg files by suggesting "Burn the Oggs", you improve it by improving the instructions. To improve the instructions, you should first of all know what's wrong with them. Saying "it does not work for me, nada, nothing, zip" does not contain any usable information.

2. The instructions contain links to software that can play Ogg/Vorbis files. Tested, tried and true.

3. I said "please sign your comments", not "please log in". Those are two completely different things. "Any post made to user talk pages, article talk pages, or other discussion pages should be signed." "Note that if you choose to contribute to Wikipedia without logging in, you should still sign your posts."—J. M. (talk) 17:58, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Something has gone wild

I can't play OGG files with Windows Media Player 9.0 directly (WMP9 can't detect the file on the right directory). It has to go through Firefox. What can I do to fix this (assuming that I am unable to install WMP10 or WMP11)? Alexius08 (talk) 10:22, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Ogg

Okay, there're all these nice links to programs that can play ogg files. Now how the heck do I make one? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 20:51, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

See Wikipedia:Creation and usage of media files. --Salix (talk): 21:25, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Improve the help

{{editprotected}} I suggest these edits be made to Wikipedia:Media_help_(Ogg) to improve the help for users.

1. In the first paragraph replace

To set up your system to play these files, find your operating system (Microsoft Windows, for example) below.

with (use the wiki source, not the rendered text)

To set up your system to play these files, scroll down to the section for your operating system (Windows, Macintosh (Mac OS X), or Unixes) below.

2. In the Windows section under VLC media player add the following bold text to note that VLC has problems playing short ogg files:

Note: VLC does not play certain short ogg files on Windows. VLC fails to play the first 0.35 seconds of certain ogg files, so that very short sound files will appear to be silent and longer ogg files may be missing the first 0.35 seconds. (This problem was last checked 2008-11-23 with the latest VLC version 0.9.6)

A good way to verify that VLC has this problem is to play this one second Image:De-zweiundzwanzig.ogg

Image:De-zweiundzwanzig.ogg

using VLC (either the plugin, or download the file and play it with the stand-alone VLC). With VLC you will hear "zwanzig" (20), but the whole file actually holds "zweiundzwanzig" (22). This could be quite misleading to a listener. Another player with this problem is Zoom, infact Zoom is even worse than VLC. All other media players I have tested work properly with short ogg files (Audacity, Cortado (Java), GOM, IrfanView, MPC, and SUPER). For good measure I have also confirmed that the double-sounding problem mentioned in #Problem with Ogg files and #VLC above still exists with VLC.

Thank you. 84user (talk) 18:40, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Can you do me a favor, please? Please add the proposed changes to a temp subpage so that they can be looked at and reviewed and implemented much more easily. Thanks! --MZMcBride (talk) 20:10, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Sysop, please update the dshow filters link

There's a new stable version: for standard Windows and for 64 bit Windows. It's highly recommended to update to those as there are a lot of bugs fixed, including but not limited to proper Vista support + 64 bit support.--Ivo ^{talk / contribs} (join Project Portugal) 13:34, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

• Ping! Would someone update this link? It's silly to have a link to the most stable version, anyway, since it will change; better to remove the link and just say "download the current stable version". You've already pointed them to the correct website. 76.19.197.209 (talk) 02:58, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. Done -SCEhardT 04:28, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Can't play ogg files

Resolved

 – — TKD::{talk} 16:21, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Yet day ago I could normally play ogg files on wikipedia, but (as I guess) since I installed this new 3.0.7 firefox update, it doesn't work. Installing the lastest java version din't help. Please help, I'm frustrated. When I clik "play" button, onlu a "more..." button shows up and nothing happens for (literally) hours. After clicking "more..." it only shows that cortado player is selected. Thx 4 help in advance.--83.12.91.242 (talk) 19:55, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

I have the same exact problem. I also use run on Firefox 3.0.7 and just installed the newest Java version. However, I can play .Ogg files on Google Chrome, so I guess the problem must be with Firefox. Can someone more knowledgeable look into this. Thanks, Do U(knome)? ^yes..._{or no} 23:52, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Confirming the problem. It is not my setup(s), because I can play .ogg files externally or with the VLC player; however, the default Cortado player does not work for me with Firefox 3.0.7 on either Windows XP 32-bit or Windows Vista 64-bit. It does work with IE7. — TKD::{talk} 12:12, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

This bug has been reported at bugzilla -SCEhardT 15:17, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

• Nice, thanks. Ok, so I'm gonna wait for the solution, inpatiently :)--83.12.91.242 (talk) 18:50, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
  • The fix is now live. — TKD::{talk} 16:21, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Java not working in Opera...

Hm... for some reason, I can no longer play media on Java while using Opera (it gives me "Applet not found." where the media should be), although Internet Explorer and Firefox still work fine with Java. This only started happening recently. I also downloaded VLC recently... would this affect Java somehow? Xnux the Echidna 01:00, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

• Never mind, I just had to install Cortado's .jar files... it works perfectly now. Xnux the Echidna 02:58, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Inline players vs. "out of line" players

The information does not indicate which player options allow media to play as if it were "embedded" within a page. Any discussion of "best" options to suggest should factor in this criterion.

The options I've tried so far cause an external program to be opened (and switched to) or cause the browser to navigate away from the page being viewed. Because of this, I avoid clicking on media in Wikipedia unless absolutely necessary because it forces me to break away from the text of the article I'm reading.

One of YouTube's usability strengths that many users are familiar with has been the ability to click and view a video without navigating away from the page that embedded it.

Which options give a similar usability boost to Wikipedia?

If you know whether a platform/browser/plug-in combination provides this, please share this information.

Lionel (talk) 17:50, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

In WinXP, FireFox, with Java, embedded audio files look like this at first and this when you click on them and they're playing. -SCEhardT 23:58, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Firefox 3.5

{{editprotected}}

Firefox 3.5 (still in beta) includes native support for Ogg (Theora and Vorbis). It should be added under the "all systems" section with a note about it still being in beta. Available for download here. --Yarnalgo _{talk to me} 06:18, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Would it be better to wait until it is fully released? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 15:56, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Agreed; let's wait for a stable version. -SCEhardT 18:10, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Alright that's fine. --Yarnalgo _{talk to me} 21:24, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

{{editprotected}} It's an official release now, can we add it? --Yarnalgo _{talk to me} 05:50, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

 Added. Hope my wording, largely copied from your initial sentence, is okay. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 06:43, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

That's fine thank you! --Yarnalgo _{talk to me} 20:31, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Actually, sorry. Since it's now the official release that link is wrong. The correct link is here. Thanks --Yarnalgo _{talk to me} 20:33, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

an ogg2mp3 guide is of unparalleled importance

mp3 players don't run oggs most of the time. --AaThinker (talk) 10:29, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Only link to open software?

Given wikimedia's (wonderful) insistence on using free formats, it seems like this page should strongly recommend or maybe only recommend free software, especially when there are great options (Miro, VLC, Mplayer, Firefox). Thoughts on that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Disbooya (talk • contribs) 04:33, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Change link for firefox 3.5

{{editprotected}}

Link is currently at the end of this sentence: Firefox 3.5 includes native support for Ogg (Theora and Vorbis). Available for download here.

Firefox 3.5 is not in beta anymore. Best link is probably just www.getfirefox.com

Done. --- RockMFR 23:38, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Usability Task Force

The issue of Wikipedia's audio content being completely inaccessible to normal mortals has been around for far, far too long now. The gods of Wikipedia need to:

• recruit a task force
• consider providing server-side recoding to a choice of real-world formats

If it turns out that server-side format conversion is considered to be technically or economically unfeasible, which is a shame as the web was designed with content negotiation facility built in, then have the task force

• have the task force review what amongst the currently recommended set software and delivery mechanisms actually works and what doesn't (is usable, does not crash and does not ruin anyone's o/s),

• write an installation procedure for [insert name of os] and deliver code to make it happen, rather simply documenting the installation problem by published a list of manual instructions, which is completely intimidating for your pension-age aunt who just wants to listen to some Handel.

Note: If a reader should pretend not to be able to understand the exact meaning of the phrase "real-word" the proposed test is:

• take one a normal user, who is not a sysadmin, and without a programming background
• take one Microsoft box, one Apple box of your choice and n mobile phones
• on each box the user does not install software or reconfigure the box. Why? Because the user does not own the box - examples: an employee, a child at school or student at a college, a user in a library, a user of a mobile phone,
• the user goes to Wikipedia, reads an article and plays some audio in it, Just like in Youtube, a site that is designed to be functional in the world as it actually is. If the user fails, then you have failed in real-worldness.

Examples of the problem:

• the illiminable WMP codecs finally - after several cycles of: test random version, give up, wait a year or so, retry - seem to work for me in my WMP11/Vista x64, after a fashion. Yet still my IE8/x64 needs registry surgery to associate the MIME types correctly. I have to go off and research this, and set up a test box rather than mess around with my main machine. Real people don't and can't do this.
• The java thing doesn't work for me. My IE8/x64 under Vista passes the Do I have Java? test at java.com, yet I have no clue what the gods of wikipedia intend should happen. (Java is supposed to get directed to handle an <object;> element?).

Call to action:

This delivery pantomime should be brought to an end. People who just use computers, rather than being career software design engineers, should be regarded as first-class Wikipedia readers. Recruit taskforce volunteers from within Wikipedia's sysadmin and dev demigods. What about a forum for programmers to share experience in relevant areas (o/s-es, browsers, ogg delivery technologies) and to volunteer support to the taskforce leaders? I'm happy to volunteer to pitch in and write some of the code, and will try to get a patch written to install/integrate delivery technologies, WMP codecs etc into IE6/7/8, +n other browsers, say. CecilWard (talk) 21:35, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

amen... Is it possible to do any browser/plug-in detection on this page and perhaps echo back to the viewer what software they have and only show relevant instructions? (i.e. a viewer with IE7 on Windows Vista would see different instructions that a FireFox on Mac viewer) I agree the non-admin use case(student, net cafe, etc.) is an eventual issue, but it seems that there are enough people married to this 'ogg' format as to make that an unappealling battle. Perhaps as a first salvo, getting it down to clear, tailored instructions for people who do own their boxes (and are free to install the 'dShow' plug in, as long as they understand it enough)Cander0000 (talk) 05:33, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Google Chrome and Chrome Frame for IE

Firefox 3.5 isn't the only browser that can play OGG natively, so can Google Chrome (as of version 3). Also, the Google Chrome Frame plugin for IE would work as well, but I don't know if Wikipedia is currently set up to aknowledge use of the plugin. Nintendo Maniac 64 (talk) 05:42, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

• Wikipedia pages don't have the "X-UA-Compatible" "chrome=1" meta tag, so Chrome Frame isn't used on IE. Tuxcantfly (talk) 22:04, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

I have just tested a freshly installed Google Chrome 3.0.196.2 (see Commons:Help talk:Converting video#test.avi results) and I find it plays the thumbnails in wikimedia commons Ok, but it fails to play the uploaded files and it fails to play OGG files locally. This contrasts with Firefox 3.5.5 which plays OGG files from thumbnail, from galleries, from direct upload link and directly from the local disk. Is there a beta or developer version of Chrome that might work? -84user (talk) 15:14, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Update myself: Now I just fully deinstalled Google Chrome 3.0.196.2 and retried the Google installer. That gave me version 3.0.195.32 which has subtly different audio sync problems from 3.0.196.2, but is an improvement. The remaining bugs appear to be bad audio sync on replay, the lack of volume control and contradictory context control. -84user (talk) 17:13, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

I am running the current Chrome beta (4.0.249.43) on Windows and it plays ogg formats well. --Jake3373 (talk) 20:56, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

{{editprotected}}

I am running Google Chrome 4.0.249.78 which is a stable build. It can play Wikipedia and local OGG sound files, without any extensions. It also works perfectly fine if set to be the default player. I'd like to see this page now edited to include Google Chrome in the OGG player list.Tangmeisterjr (talk) 22:15, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

I support your request to add Chrome to the list for OGG sound files. Also for Theora video files, but with a caveat that the user may see and hear glitches with combined audio video files. For example, I find Chrome version 4.0.249.89 plays the videos listed in Commons:Help talk:Converting video#Calibration test videos and at commons:User:84user/Video tests#ffmpeg2theora version 0.26 with the same errors as version 3.0.195.32, except zoom works correctly now. Chrome sometimes glitches on replay with File:Test avi.ogv, a 6 second test file that most players except Firefox and Media Player Classic have problems with. -84user (talk) 02:59, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Please state the exact wording that you are proposing, thanks. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 07:25, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Hmmm.... I dunno, really... I'll get back to that. And as for the replaying of that video file, Test avi.ogv, it works until you want to replay by pressing the pause button instead of the scroll bar at the bottom. Though it's probably going to be fixed if it's brought to Google's attention. Tangmeisterjr (talk) 17:40, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Proposed incremental change

Propose the following change to improve instructions for the typical, non-SysAdmin Wikipedia viewer: Replace steps 2-4

2. Go to xiph.org/dshow.
3. Download the current stable version.
4. Wait for the setup program to download. This should take less than 2 minutes on a 56k modem.

with

2. Download the latest DirectShow Filters
(renumber remaining steps down)

Rationale:

• the current 'stable' version of these DirectShow filters has been published since 12/2008. Its unlikely that any event would cause it to spontaneously become 'unstable', even if a new version was published. This page appears to monitored/discussed enough that an update to the 'stable' version would be noticed by advanced wikipedia editors and the page updated. Likewise if this link was to become dead or a critical security risk discovered, this face would be noted and the link removed fairly quickly.
• "Wait for the setup..." balancing helpful vs. patronizing - thoughts?
• "This should take less than 2 minutes..." 'your results may vary' - this seems like more of a sales pitch than informational. With wikipedia's global reach, i'm more of the mindset that 'it will take as long as it takes'. Unless MediaWiki supports estimates of download times for a variety of file types and connection speeds based on a geographic location, what's the compelling reason to call out a particular network connection type, assumed location and time estimate here?

I know this isn't close to a complete solution to making audio/video accessible to mere mortals, but perhaps some little improvements like there can chip away! Cander0000 (talk) 06:00, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Looks like a good change to me. Can someone confirm that the 32 bit installer will work on a 64 bit machine? -SCEhardT 15:21, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

I don't agree with this change; the 32-bit installer doesn't work on 64-bit Windows, and also the xiph page already has a clear, one-click link to the download; users would probably rather be able to read the homepage for details on what the filters are and what the installer modifies before randomly downloading and running installers. Tuxcantfly (talk) 22:10, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Agreed on the 32-bit and 64-bit distinction. Unless there is a way to detect the viewer's OS? Disagree on the '...rather be able to read the homepage for details...'. I'm thinking 90% or better viewers of this page (a subset excluding the ones that gave up before even reaching this page) are just trying to get the filter up and running. The sysadmin types can always visit xiph to learn more.

so how about:

2. Download the latest DirectShow Filters for:
* 32 bit Windows
* 63 bit Windows
(renumber remaining steps down)

Using Silverlight 3's Raw AV Pipeline for Ogg Vorbis and Theora Playback

The latest version of Silverlight supports 3rd-party codecs via the raw AV pipeline, as mentioned in the release notes. An Ogg Vorbis player in Silverlight has already been implemented; a Theora version would also be possible. Given that Cortado is a rather inadequate solution for those using browsers without native Ogg support, and Silverlight's install base is steadily increasing, perhaps a Silverlight-based Ogg player should be added as an option? Is there any project ongoing at bringing a Silverlight-based Ogg Vorbis/Theora viewing option that I can get involved in? Tuxcantfly (talk) 20:43, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

• In fact a pure C# Theora decoder has already been written; all that remains is to create the hooks to the Silverlight raw AV pipeline API. Tuxcantfly (talk) 21:13, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
• And there now apparently exists a plugin by Nuanti that does just this; http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2010/02/nuanti-brings-html5-and-ogg-theora-video-to-silverlight.ars Tuxcantfly (talk) 00:23, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

SeaMonkey 2.0

SeaMonkey 2.0 has native support for Ogg, could that be included? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Oldlaptop321 (talk • contribs)

Downloading an entire software suite just to play media files seems excessive to me, so I would suggest not including it. -SCEhardT 19:57, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

RealPlayer does not use DirectShow, current instructions won't work

Since RealPlayer does not use DirectShow, installing the Illiminable plugins aren't sufficient to get playback working in RealPlayer. Instead the Xiph plugins for Helix need to be installed. Tuxcantfly (talk) 17:02, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Has this information been added to Wikipedia:Media help (Ogg)? It still states "RealPlayer (download)" followed by "Go to xiph.org/dshow." and "Download the current stable version." -84user (talk) 18:20, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Illiminable link

Related to my RealPlayer query above, what exactly are the Illiminable plugins and how does a reader get them? Does the http://www.xiph.org/dshow/ provide them? Could an expert please make it clearer?

• Yes, that is the plugin I was referring to. Tuxcantfly (talk) 07:14, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Also, if correct, I suggest rewording the Windows Media Player line like this (simpler logic):

1. Most Windows users will already have Windows Media Player installed on their computer. If you do and are happy to use it then skip to step 2. Otherwise, please install another player from the list below.

-84user (talk) 18:20, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Please change link at the end

There's a pointer to the Video category at the end of the article. It should rather point to Category:Videos which are actual video files and not onlt photos related to video. Dittaeva (talk) 21:33, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Plays with no sound

I'm using Firefox 3.6 and when I find one of these files, it plays it but there's no sound. Does anyone have an idea of what might be the problem? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.20.47.58 (talk) 22:13, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

I have this problem as well. Firefox 3.6.8, Arch Linux. Sound works perfectly fine in VLC, mplayer and with flash. I suspect that Firefox needs to be configured to use Jack, but I've not been able to figure out how. (I could not make jacklaunch + FIREFOX_DSP work for me, as jacklaunch does not seem to be available for Arch?). --Alexander256 (talk) 11:43, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Edit request from Waterfalls12, 5 June 2010

Template:TlX Google Chrome and Opera also can play Vorbis and Theora natively. These browsers should be added next to Firefox.

Playing embedded ogg files in Firefox

This is how I got embedded ogg files to play in Firefox on Windows.

1. Go to file associations in Windows and associate ogg files with QuickTime

2. Download the ogg plug-in for QuickTime called XiphQT 0.1.5 (Windows). It's available here http://www.xiph.org/quicktime/download.html

iOS

What about iOS users?! gujamin (talk) 17:30, 21 November 2010 (UTC) indeed. html5?81.187.45.71 (talk) 23:34, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

One possibility is the Wikipanion app from Robert Chin. If this is a workable solution, it might be useful to add an "iOS" or "iOS devices" section to the project page. -- Elegie (talk) 07:24, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Indeed, pull request to replace "not supported" with that.24.24.168.181 (talk) 10:32, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

New Language

Please add si:විකිපීඩියා:Media help (Ogg) to other languages list. Thanks... පසිඳු කාවින්ද (talk) 15:06, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Edit request from Shakira126, 13 June 2011

I would like to be an administrator on Wikipedia because my request was completely confirmed before but I never got any information back from an administrator. I have been waiting and my editing is firm and understanding as of the cover files that I have been uploading all of this time. I am completely ready for adminship and I just can't get this thought out of my head. I think everyday and night about Wikipedia and I think it is time for me to move on to the next level. Shakira126 (talk) 22:06, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

User was blocked. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 10:22, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Browser Version #s Linked

the browser version number quoted next to the links, FF, chrome, opera need updating or removing completely as they are out of date. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.105.212.184 (talk) 11:35, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Eratic volume control on embedded player

Might not be the best place to ask, but any idea why (using my Firefox 5.0 install) the volume control is non existent in the in-line (article) media links, but is accessible without issue if I open the Ogg file directly in the browser? MrZoolook (talk) 22:27, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Windows 7

My old desktop with Vista works fine with Wikipedia and OGG but I needed a portable one so bought a Windows 7 netbook. It wouldn't play OGG videos in articles including one I put in Trikke. So, I installed VLC. Still no go. So, Java. That made it work. Minor nuisance to me, but it must be an insoluble problem to that majority of computer owners who never install a program much less search for information about which program would be appropriate. Is my initial failure typical of Windows 7 users? If so, I consider it a terrible thing. Wikipedia should be readable not just for me but for people even more ignorant than me. Jim.henderson (talk) 14:29, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia is free and open. Microsoft is not free and it's 'free' browser supports only it's format that it licenses and costs. Wikipedia could pay both Microsoft a few $million to be licensed so it work for Microsoft own customers or they could help users use open software such as FireFox and browsers that support open standards such as Opera and Chrome. I'd prefer Wikipedia is open and keep the money for it's own projects. That said this page and Wikipedia in general is poor at informing users and could be updated greatly. The solution for ignorant people is to educate. Regards, Sun Creator^(talk) 11:20, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Mozilla

Are you sure it still links to firefox 3.5??? Please update it! --190.60.93.218 (talk) 16:00, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Done. Regards, Sun Creator^(talk) 22:29, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Ogg Opus

Is Ogg Opus used on any of the Wikipedia audio files? Chrome doesn't support it only Ogg Vorbis. Regards, Sun Creator^(talk) 22:43, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Call to revisit "ogg" as a standard format

Please note that even the Wikimedia Foundation, in the banners that are running at the top of wikipedia as of this writing, has even chosen a more accessible format: [1] By doing so, the video plays inline with the current page, or can easily be expanded to a full screen, with software widely available and even standard in most browsers. What would it take to move Wikipedia away from ogg and to a more accessible format?Cander0000 (talk) 07:37, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

That's a link to external media rather then hosting it on Wikipedia. A move to a none open format would be against the third part of the WP:FIVEPILLARS. It could also be potentially expensive and no Creative commons license would be possible. Would donators be happy that Wikipedia funds where going to license media? Also you'd still have the same issue of compatibility as there is no universally accepted media type for sound and videos unlike jpg/png for pictures; Apple, Microsoft and Google promote there own media type and are not compatible with other vendors without some additional software. Even Youtube (arguably the most widespread) is not supported out of the box by Apple for example and Apple users have to install additional software(Flash player) to get Youtube to work. Regards, Sun Creator^(talk) 02:51, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Just asking: why OGG?

I am not here to insult people who use linux or criticise a particular codec: I am just interested as to why Wikipedia uses such an obscure file format for audio.
After a file not playing at all on a perfectly useable computer, i.e a 2011 Mac Mini with 8GB of ram and an intel core i7, running the latest version of mac OSX, I decided to look at the media help page. It describes ogg vorbis files as being playable on almost all computers, which in my opinion is compete and utter nonsense. Mac OSX and Windows do not support OGG by default, and therefore require specialist software. Although we are told about this, the average wikipedia user (ie me) simply doesn't have the time or maybe simply can't be bothered to install extra software. This, I'm afraid, makes ordinary users feel slightly thick, if you will please excuse my minor insult to Wikipedians there.
My question is, Whilst I agree that OGGs sound much better than mp3s and take up less disk space (and therefore cost less to store and distribute etc...), it simply doesn't make sense to use them on Wikipedia as PCs running mac os or windows can't support them by default, which is therefore inconveniencing those users by making them install software and plugins.
Additionally, I recognise that MP3 and AAC are patented codecs, but isn't the restriction on MP3 running out soon anyway? (in the next couple of years I believe)
Just as a suggestion, you could include two download options: one for the ogg file for linux users, and one with the mp3 for everyone else.
Unlike most people on here, I'm not actually stupid in this area: I use my computer for a lot of sound recording type stuff, so I have experience with problematic OGG Files, such as people emailing them to me and them not working on my computer.
I don't think the most realistic solution is to force software upon people who may not necessarily know what they are doing. I know mp3 is more proprietary and everything, but it seems to make more sense to me to use it.
It's not as though windows and mac os are popular OSes or anything, so there's no need to worry...
Most of the pictures on wikipedia are jpegs. that's a patented, restricted format. why not go with PNGs if you are really that obsessed with being free?Ahretrop (talk) 09:26, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

JPEG is not patented. As for MP3, "restriction on MP3 running out soon anyway? (in the next couple of years)" logically means the patents still apply, therefore MP3 simply cannot be used on Wikipedia for the next couple of years. Furthermore, Ogg/Vorbis is supported by default in Firefox, Chrome and Opera (which, as of 2013, are used by the majority of users), no need to install any plugins. For the minority of people using Internet Explorer or Safari, they can either complain to Microsoft or Apple (who don't support Ogg only for their own "strategic reasons", to keep collecting money for their own patent-encumbered formats), use a better browser (which is available for any major OS), or use a plugin. It's their choice. If someone decides to use IE or Safari, they cannot complain to Wikipedia.—J. M. (talk) 05:28, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Linux user?Ahretrop (talk) 15:09, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

I'm a Mac user on Mountain lion. I use Firefox and occasionally Chrome. Both support Ogg by default. Regards, Sun Creator^(talk) 21:04, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

As a Mac user and donator to Wikipedia, you would have to ask the question what is the point donating to Wikipedia just to have some of the funds given to Apple, just because Apple are not supporting Ogg? It would be rather crazy. A sensible way forward would be to contact Apple (https://www.apple.com/contact/) and let them know you want them to support Ogg. Regards, Sun Creator^(talk) 21:09, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Not sure if this is the right page, but...

Can anyone help me figure out whether a sound recording is in the public domain? I'd really like to include a vocal recording at Barcarolle (Offenbach) rather than the synthesized version currently included, but am having trouble figuring out whether this recording, for instance, is in the public domain due to its age. The piece itself is of course public domain. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 19:59, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

what moron retard thinks this is a good idea?

it's like fukking 1997 here with downloadin special "plugins" with stupid names from some idiot science fiction movie or something. and which don't work anyway. wikipedia hardly ever makes a bad decision, but you've made an absolutely braindamaged one here. 69.181.168.139 (talk) 04:39, 24 April 2013 (UTC)