Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Somalia

Proposed deletions

FYI: Irir Samaale has been proposed for deletion, due to being unverified since June 2006. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 02:48, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Mahamed Muumin has been proposed for deletion, due to being unverified since July 2006 (Mohamed Muumin appears to be a duplicate article). -- Gyrofrog (talk) 22:48, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme

As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level. The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.

• The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.
• The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.
• A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.

Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at Category:C-Class_articles. If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages. The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles.

Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme. This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year. Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot (Disable) 20:51, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Somali people dispute

There is currently a dispute at Talk:Somali people#Infobox image, about which image to use in the article's infobox. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 04:33, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for Somalia

Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.

We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations.

A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible.

We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 23:07, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

African cinema task force

An African cinema task force has been proposed at WikiProject Films, which would include the cinema of Somalia. Interested editors are encouraged to sign up - if there is enough interest, then the task force will be created! Many thanks, Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 03:54, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Coordinators' working group

Hi! I'd like to draw your attention to the new WikiProject coordinators' working group, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate. This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators.

All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group. If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. — Delievered by §hepBot (Disable) on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 06:35, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Article alerts

This is a notice to let you know about Article alerts, a fully-automated subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering Articles for deletion, Requests for comment, Peer review and other workflows (full list). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found here.

If you are already subscribed to Article Alerts, it is now easier to report bugs and request new features. We are also in the process of implementing a "news system", which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the display=none parameter, but forget to give a link to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Wikipedia:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at Wikipedia talk:Article alerts.

Message sent by User:Addbot to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome here.

Thanks. — Headbomb {^ταλκ_{κοντριβς} – WP Physics} 09:41, 15 March, 2009 (UTC)

Proposal for a 200-WikiProject contest

A proposal has been posted for a contest between all 200 country WikiProjects. We're looking for judges, coordinators, ideas, and feedback.

The Transhumanist 00:39, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

{{User WikiProject Somalia}}

{{User WikiProject Somalia}} has bean created.--Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 12:26, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Clan lineage

On many of the clan and sub-clan articles, the lineage section consists of an unwieldy list. Anything where I've had to scroll down for more than one or two screens (example), I've been adding {{Cleanup-laundry}} in that section. I can't imagine, in their current state, how these lists could be useful to anyone - they seem to be lists of names. I propose that there should be some sort of guideline to keeping these concise, or that there is some sort of threshold for inclusion. One rule of thumb could be that a list item links to an actual article (I've been using that criteria for lists of notable people). -- Gyrofrog (talk) 23:03, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

• (Also posted this at Wikipedia talk:Africa-related regional notice board#Somali clan lineage.) -- Gyrofrog (talk) 23:34, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

CambridgeBayWeather has edited Marehan, Dhulbahante and Majerteen, replacing the lengthy sub-clan listings with an attributed tree. This is much easier to read, and I think a good approach for other pages. Thanks. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 17:30, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

I've taken a similar approach with the Hawiye article, see Talk:Hawiye#Sub-clan listings. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 19:34, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

The current is incomplete and inaccurate. Many sub-subclans have been erased as a result and I am wondering what is the wisdom behind doing so? The Somali clan family is very complex and some have even compared it to an onion, meaning no matter how you peel it, you will never get to the center. My point is, the previous template/configuration might have been irrelevant to non-Somalis, but it makes perfect sense to us Somalis and we would appreciate if the previous configuration is brought back. It makes no sense at all to have say Isaaq or Darood genealogy in a page that is about say Abgaal. I hope you will correct this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Evolvingprimate (talk • contribs) 15:10, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

This is evolvingprimate by the way. Just can't seem to see how to post to the discussion with my username

It needs to be comprehensible by anyone, and there needs to be a threshold for inclusion. It might make better sense on Somali Wikipedia, but where I also expect there is a similar policy or guideline in place regarding notability, verifiability, readability etc. The information also needs to be verifiable, which it is following the updates. I think another alternative is to simply remove such listings. (By the way, you can add your signature by typing ~~~~). -- Gyrofrog (talk) 16:43, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the feedback Gyrofrog. I agree with your comprehensibility and threshold for inclusion. But the latest style does exactly the opposite. It is not indepth, omits many sub-sub clans and provides a very vague and incomplete list of Somalia's clan families. The list from the CIA and the World Fact Book that you have used provide simply a very rudimentary and basic information and eliminates many sub-clans in the process. Just to illustrate my point. A sub-clan like Abgaal is divided into 3 main branches. These 3 main branches then break down into dozens of sub-clans and so forth. The current one that you endorse eliminates all these sub-clans and makes things as basic as possible. It will help everyone if the list is made as comprehensive and indepth as possible. This will make Wikipedia a better place for information and the same time accurate, which I understand is your goal. (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 19:31, 15 December 2009 (UTC).

I am all for expanding the lists, if the information can be verified, and up to a certain point. I think if someone has to scroll down (especially more than one screen) to see the end of the list, then it's too long, and either needs to be pruned, or part of it needs to be moved to another article. We have been using verifiability as a threshold for inclusion, and information should be verifiable in the first place as part of Wikipedia policy. We are trying to avoid having lists like this old version. Thanks, -- Gyrofrog (talk) 19:57, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Somalia Affair

A dispute has arisen on the Somalia Affair article regarding what I and another user believe to be the gratuitous use of racist language (namely, the word nigger) where it is not warranted and when WP:PROFANITY specifically instructs that it should be relegated to footnotes, as "the strong wording is relevant but not central to the statement". The other party in the dispute believes that the strong language is indeed relevant and central to the statement, and therefore ought to be preserved at all costs. We have discussed this particular issue and another related one involving the contents and the formatting of a specific wiki table in some detail on the article's talk page. It would be appreciated if all interested parties post their views on both issues at that location after having first read the relevant links above. Middayexpress (talk) 19:32, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Sub-clan articles and redirects

I have redirected a number of sub-clan articles to their respective major clan articles (Category:Somali clans has gone from approx. 150 articles to 30, as a result). At least one editor believes this was an overly bold move on my part, but seeing how many of these articles had been tagged for one issue or another (no references, clean-up etc.) for up to three years in some cases, I personally don't think there was anything bold about it.

For the most part, I did these as redirects, not merges: In most cases, the sub-clan articles consisted of unreferenced information and an unwieldy (and effectively non-useful) list of sub-sub-clans. The main clan articles certainly would not gain anything from merging that information. This does not preclude having separate sub-clan articles in the future, but at this time the articles really did not stand on their own.

I am reverting to the re-direct when I see an edit revert back to a version that lacks attribution (or has additional issues). Again, most of these had been tagged for months, and in many cases for years.

Generally, if a given sub-clan article had sources, then it could stand on its own, and I did not redirect (unless the same content was already in the main article). Also, in a couple of cases, if a given sub-clan did not have an identifiable "parent" clan (e.g. Meheri) then I left it as-is.

See also: Talk:Isaaq#Merges and redirects to this article and Talk:Darod#Redirects to Darod. Thank you. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 14:37, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

Cisman Mahmoud

There are problems with two of the references in Cisman Mahmoud. I have also proposed moving the article to "Ismaan Mahamuud" or "Osman Mahamud". See Talk:Cisman Mahmoud for more details. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 17:09, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Y Done, thanks Middayexpress. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 16:58, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

The letter c

I propose that we re-name articles that use the letter "c", if and when there is a known preferred English spelling. The letter "c" has a completely different usage in Somali (i.e. as a voiced pharyngeal fricative) than it does in English, and I don't think it's useful to name articles that way in the English Wikipedia. (Example: Rename Cisman Mahmoud to either "Ismaan Mahamuud" or "Osman Mahamud") -- Gyrofrog (talk) 17:09, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks to Middayexpress for taking care of Cisman Mahmoud/Osman Mahmoud. I've also moved Ceel Waaq (and redirected Ceelwaaq) to El Wak, Somalia. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 15:28, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

WP 1.0 bot announcement

This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 03:56, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced living people articles bot

User:DASHBot/Wikiprojects provides a list, updated daily, of unreferenced living people articles (BLPs) related to your project. There has been a lot of discussion recently about deleting these unreferenced articles, so it is important that these articles are referenced.

The unreferenced articles related to your project can be found at >>>Wikipedia:WikiProject Somalia/Unreferenced BLPs<<<

If you do not want this wikiproject to participate, please add your project name to this list.

Thank you.

Update: Wikipedia:WikiProject Somalia/Unreferenced BLPs has been created. This list, which is updated by User:DASHBot/Wikiprojects daily, will allow your wikiproject to quickly identify unreferenced living person articles.

There maybe no or few articles on this new Unreferenced BLPs page. To increase the overall number of articles in your project with another bot, you can sign up for User:Xenobot_Mk_V#Instructions.

If you have any questions or concerns, visit User talk:DASHBot/Wikiprojects. Okip 23:29, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Hussein Shuqul

The article on Somali General Hussein Shuqul has been tagged as an "unreferenced BLP" since May 2008. I came across the article as May 2008 is the current focus for the Unreferenced BLP Rescue Project. I have tried, and failed, to come up with any reliable third party references to support the text. As a Chief of Staff in the Somali Army, I believe he should meet the Military History Notability Guidelines but this is not my area of expertise. I'm posting here in the hope that someone in this project with more knowledge of recent Somali history than I have might like to take an interest in the article.--Plad2 (talk) 21:40, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Somalia articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release

Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone. Articles were selected based on their assessed importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.

We would like to ask you to review the Somalia articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details. You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.

We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010. As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide. Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback!

For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 23:38, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Question on List of Somalis

There is some ambiguity or dispute regarding the scope of the article List of Somalis. An editor recently added an athlete to the list, and another editor removed her on the grounds that, despite being of Somali nationality, she is not an ethnic Somali. The second editor considered that the list is intended exclusively for people of Somali ethnicity, and that this is demonstrated by the lead, which stated "This is a list of notable Somalis from Somalia, Djibouti, and those of Somali descent living elsewhere in the world" (with "Somalis" linking to the article on Somali people, the ethnic group). I reverted, arguing that the article was categorised under "Lists of people by nationality", and that it was therefore intended for people of Somali nationality, as well as people of Somali ethnicity. In addition, the original lead of the article, back in 2004, described it as a "list of people from Somalia". The editor re-reverted me, insisting that the article was meant only for people of Somali ethnicity, and that it should exclude ethnic minorities within Somalia; he changed the article's categorisation to match his interpretation, removing it from the category "Lists of people by nationality" and adding it to "Lists of people by ethnicity". I pointed out that this means there is no longer a list of people of Somali nationality, but he believes this is immaterial, since "just about all extant Wiki bios of notable Somali citizens are of people specifically from the Somali ethnic group, not any of the country's ethnic minorities".
So I'm seeking clarification from you, WikiProject Somalia. There needs to be some clarification, one way or another, and I would prefer it to be based on consensus, rather than unilateral recategorisation of articles. Is this to be a list of people of Somali ethnicity, or of Somali nationality, or should it be open to both? If it's open to both, how should it be presented? If it's solely a list of people of Somali ethnicity, then where should people of Somali nationality be listed (if anywhere)? Wikipedia standard procedure is to have lists of people from every nationality, but it might seem odd to have two separate lists here. I would suggest they be conflated, as the least awkward solution in my view (i.e., confirm that this is a list of people of Somali nationality and/or ethnicity), but I'm aware that's far from being a perfect solution either. Thoughts? Aridd (talk) 07:58, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Actually, what happened was that a newly-created account added [1] to the List of Somalis article a link to a Wikipedia bio on an athlete from Somalia. However, although the athlete in question is indeed from Somalia, she is not actually from the Somali ethnic group on which the List of Somalis article is based in the first place; she is from one of the nation's minority ethnic groups, as her biographical article clearly states. I therefore logically removed the link-through to the athlete's article, and fully explained in some detail to the user above my reasons for doing so, both in my edit summary [2] and in this discussion on his talk page (where my comments that are quoted above can be read in their proper context). Here's basically what I pointed out to the editor; the List was indeed intended for Somalis only because:

• Its introduction clearly indicated at the time of the start of the dispute a few days ago that "This is a list of notable Somalis from Somalia, Djibouti, and those of Somali descent living elsewhere in the world", with the key subject term "Somalis" linking-through to the Somali people ethnic group article, not to the Somalia article.
• The reference to Djibouti (a separate country from Somalia, where about 60% of the local population belongs to the Somali ethnic group) and "those of Somali descent living elsewhere in the world" (a reference to Somalis inhabiting both other parts of so-called Greater Somalia as well as the Somali diaspora) likewise clearly demonstrates that the article pertained to the Somali ethnic group only.
• The List only features actual Somalis in it, irrespective of their country of origin; it does not feature any people from Somalia's minority ethnic groups such as Bantus, Bajunis or Bravanese. This is what I meant when I indicated that "It's also not really an issue if there is no page listing notable people with Somali citizenship since just about all extant Wiki bios of notable Somali citizens are of people specifically from the Somali ethnic group" -- there is literally only one existing Wikipedia biography on a citizen of Somalia that is not from the Somali ethnic group; and as it so happens, that article is the same athlete's bio that the initial new account tried to add to the List of Somalis article.
• Somalia was named after the area's numerically dominant ethnic group; namely, the Somalis. In other words, the term "Somali" as an ethnonym long preceded its invention as a denonym in the colonial period, and is, in fact, the very reason for the existence of the denonym in the first place.

To the various points enumerated above, the editor counters that since the List has among its categories the "Lists of people by nationality" category, it was therefore intended for people of Somali nationality. However, as I've also pointed out to him, this is misleading, as the article is also listed under the Category:Djibouti-related lists category; it obviously wouldn't be if it were only about citizens of Somalia. The "List of of people by nationality" category was also added back when the article contained only a short list of ethnic Somalis, all exclusively from Somalia. Now, several years later, the article has grown to include many more biographies from Somalis from all regions, so the category is no longer appropriate. The "Lists of people by nationality" category therefore needed to be changed to the "Lists of people by ethnicity" category to reflect the present contents of the article, not what the article may have been like four years ago (the last time the article's lede indicated that it only pertained to people from Somalia). This is why I replaced that category with the more appropriate "Lists of people by ethnicity" category. The editor is right about one thing, though: There obviously cannot be two lists labeled "List of Somalis". But making the list simultaneously about ethnicity and nationality is not an alternative either, as ethnic Somalis do not traditionally just come from a single country and people from Somalia are not just from the Somali ethnic group. Somali citizens of Djibouti, or in the Ogaden with Ethiopian citizenship, or in the North Eastern Province with Kenyan citizenship, for example, have very little if anything in common with the ethnic minority citizens of Somalia; the people they share actual kinship ties with in the country are their fellow Somalis. That is the common denominator. The same goes for Somalis born abroad in the diaspora, or especially people of partial Somali descent.

Per the relevant WP:CAT policy:

• Each article should be placed in all of the most specific categories to which it logically belongs.
• It should be clear from verifiable information in the article why it was placed in each of its categories. Use the {{Category unsourced}} template if you find an article in a category that is not shown by sources to be appropriate, or the {{Category relevant?}} template if the article gives no clear indication for inclusion in a category.

All of the actually verifiable material indicates that, while the people in the List do not all share nationality, they certainly do all have ethnicity in common -- they are all from the Somali ethnic group, regardless of their country of citizenship. Some were even born abroad or are only partly of Somali descent. Hence, the common denominator is obviously their ethnicity, not their nationality (and one specific nationality at that): the former is clearly the most specific, all-encompassing and appropriate type of category the article belongs in. Middayexpress (talk) 12:49, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject cleanup listing

I have created together with Smallman12q a toolserver tool that shows a weekly-updated list of cleanup categories for WikiProjects, that can be used as a replacement for WolterBot and this WikiProject is among those that are already included (because it is a member of Category:WolterBot cleanup listing subscriptions). See the tool's wiki page, this project's listing in one big table or by categories and the index of WikiProjects. Svick (talk) 20:43, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

Unsourced edits to Somalia articles

After noticing a comment thrown into the Balad, Somalia article, I reviewed the history of the article to try to fix and revert some mistakes and deletions on it. I noticed that IP addresses 86.180.32.115, 86.183.234.130, and 86.183.146.49, among potentially others, have made similar, unsourced edits to multiple article about Somalia. For example, Balad is noted to have the nickname of Teyteyley [3] (later, User:Taytayley edited [4] Balad, Somalia, complaining about the accuracy of a reference). Because of edits by these IPs, Wikipedia and derivatives is the only page indexed by Google that mentions Hassan Gedi Abtow [5][6]. There seem to be more similar edits.

I am not sure if this added information is just content that cannot be readily found elsewhere, or subtle vandalism to the pages. As I know little about Somalia, could one of you at the project help by investigating this? Thanks! Joe Schmedley^Talk 03:17, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Infobox Images for Ethnic Groups

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ethnic groups#Infobox Images for Ethnic Groups. Gyrofrog (talk) 18:39, 20 January 2011 (UTC) (Using {{Please see}}) -- Gyrofrog (talk) 18:39, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

RFC at al-Shabaab

A quick tip off: There's an RFC that's relevant to this project at talk:al-Shabaab#Somaliland RFC. --Copper button 19:24, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Discussion at Articles for Deletion

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Republic of Ogadenia. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 20:52, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Template:Somalia_topics edit war

There's presently a discussion at Template_talk:Somalia_topics that hasn't been going anything, and the participates persist in reverting each other. I'm not knowledgeable in the issues being discussed, so it would be helpful if someone here were to provide a third opinion in this dispute. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 12:34, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Ive posted an opinion on the page.XavierGreen (talk) 04:17, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Category:African musical instruments

You are invited to join the discussion at User talk:Redheylin#Where did you get consensus for dumping everything into "African musical instruments"?. Gyrofrog (talk) 18:19, 2 June 2011 (UTC) (Using {{pls}})

WikiWomen's History Month

Hi everyone. March is Women's History Month and I'm hoping a few folks here at WP:Somalia will have interest in putting on events (on and off wiki) related to women's roles in Somalia's history, society and culture. We've created an event page on English Wikipedia (please translate!) and I hope you'll find the inspiration to participate. These events can take place off wiki, like edit-a-thons, or on wiki, such as themes and translations. Please visit the page here: WikiWomen's History Month. Thanks for your consideration and I look forward to seeing events take place! SarahStierch (talk) 22:18, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:Muse clan

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Muse clan. Gyrofrog (talk) 19:06, 2 February 2012 (UTC)Template:Z48

A new template

The current Somalia Wikiproject template is redirecting to the AfricaProject one. Most other national Wikiprojects have their own template. Instead using the current one where you need to add Somalia as a sidebar wich notes 'This article is supported by WikiProject Somalia', we can create an independent template. Who is interested? Runehelmet (talk) 17:37, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Are you sure about the redirect? The template/redirect has been deleted for a while, unless there's a similar template out there somewhere.

I've generally been using the WP:AFRICA template, myself, especially when a particular article is related to more than one country. This way we only need one infobox, instead of 2 or 3. The resultant categorization for the specific country (or countries) is the same either way.

Having said that, looking at the (deleted) edit history, the WP:SOMALIA template had always been a redirect to WP:AFRICA, ever since it was created. (That's not how I remembered it, but that's what the edit history says.) However, the redirect caused some technical problems (which, if you're interested, you can read about in an old discussion). These were fixed, but not long after that the template was flagged for deletion. By that time, most of the articles were already using WP:AFRICA (since the redirect hadn't been working for quite a while). -- Gyrofrog (talk) 23:51, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Interesting to hear. But is it not time to change it. If we look at our related projects e.g Ethiopia their project banner template don't have the WikiProject Africa|project name=yes style. I'm just suggesting; is it possible to create or edit it so it's independent of the Africa Project? Like: Runehelmet (talk) 17:13, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Sure it's feasible. A good model to follow for this perhaps might be template WikiProject Egypt. Middayexpress (talk) 15:07, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Exactly, but do you know how to create that kind of a template? Runehelmet (talk) 17:52, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

I've started draft template and documentation sub-pages. Feel free to tweak them as needed. We can move them to the mainspace when they're ready. Middayexpress (talk) 14:28, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Alright good to hear, I'm looking forward to see it. Runehelmet (talk) 17:28, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Puntland

I've(not a member of this project, awww!) proposed for WP:PUNTLAND. Please do visit that and make your remarks.Mir Almaat Ali Almaat ☏ From Trivandrum, Kerala, India(UTC+5:30) 07:09, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Beautiful pictures of this country

Hi, just a quick note about this category on Commons containing photos related to this country which could really use inclusion in Wikipedia articles, beside an improved categorization. Thanks for your help! --Elitre (talk) 13:10, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Somali shilling

Hi,

For the Least valued currency unit article we are in dire need of an up-to-date source for the market value for the Somali shilling, Unfortunately I can't seem to find anything online other than the fact that value has risen significantly recently. Possibly someone on here knows of a Somali language source with more current data?

Thanks, 12:01, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Somalis in the United Kingdom

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Somalis_in_the_United_Kingdom#Undue_.26_unrepresentative. Middayexpress (talk) 09:52, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Split proposal for Piracy in Somalia

This is a notification that I've proposed a split of Piracy in Somalia. Please see Talk:Piracy in Somalia#Split for details and to voice your opinion. Thanks, BDD (talk) 21:57, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Battle of Gedo

Hi again, I have some concerns about the Battle of Gedo article. I invite you to comment at Talk:Battle of Gedo#Scope. Thanks, BDD (talk) 17:33, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

does ancient somali writing (pre Wadaad's writing) exist?

Hi Somalia editors. Recently, someone asked a question on the reference desk (current link link after June 13) about finding an image of the writing referred to in Somali ancient script. In researching the answer, I began to wonder whether this script even exists.

1. The article (as well as Somali language and Somali people)) both base the existence of this undeciphered script on a 1878 Royal Society report: [7] which mentions inscriptions in only two sentences: (p447) "I also discovered ancient ruins and rock-inscriptions both in pictures and characters. These have hitherto not been deciphered."

2. How can we claim that an undeciphered script exists on the basis that a traveller in 1878 saw inscriptions that no one could translate for him at the time?

3.(Somali ancient script used to say, based on this source, "The findings of archaeological excavations and research in the area by the Royal Geographical Society of Great Britain, among others, show that this civilization had an ancient writing system that remains undeciphered." I changed this yesterday to reflect what the source actually says.)

4. Trying to find a source for a Somali writing system that predated Wadaad's writing, I could only find this paper by someone at the Uni of Turin that claims there was NO indigenous writing in the Somalia region until Arabic script arrived (i.e. Wadaad's writing).

5. So does a pre-Wadaad's writing script even exist?

6. If it does, can we find a better source (and an image for the original questioner)?

7. If it doesn't, should this article be merged with Wadaad's writing?

Thanks, 184.147.118.213 (talk) 17:28, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Yes, an ancient Somali writing script exists. It was described by the Somali government in at least two of its publications on Somali writing systems, including one cited on the Somali ancient script page (c.f. [8]). Middayexpress (talk) 12:47, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Excellent, that's a better source than the 1878 mention. Can you help find a picture of it for the Ref Desk questioner? Thanks, 184.147.118.213 (talk) 17:55, 12 June 2013 (UTC)