Talk:Honda CBR900RR: Difference between revisions
m Talk page general fixes & other cleanup using AWB (9417) |
Made an explanatory comment. |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
:Or the other way 'round! The Fireblade page should redirect here (and its content stolen and placed here), as CBR900RR is the bike's model name (Fireblade is its marketing name, of which, for a particular model, there may be more than one). With this particular model it is not such a problem, but where there are two or more marketing names (neither of which is the model name, e.g., Firestorm and Super Hawk, both for VTR1000F), keeping the model-named page the main page, and the other names redirects, makes a lot of sense. That said, the Fireblade page needs some grammar work (I wonder which language it was originally!) [[User:JZH|JZH]] |
:Or the other way 'round! The Fireblade page should redirect here (and its content stolen and placed here), as CBR900RR is the bike's model name (Fireblade is its marketing name, of which, for a particular model, there may be more than one). With this particular model it is not such a problem, but where there are two or more marketing names (neither of which is the model name, e.g., Firestorm and Super Hawk, both for VTR1000F), keeping the model-named page the main page, and the other names redirects, makes a lot of sense. That said, the Fireblade page needs some grammar work (I wonder which language it was originally!) [[User:JZH|JZH]] |
||
== == |
|||
Did some re-working of the article based on the 20th Anniversary articles on http://world.honda.com/CBR1000RR/history/index.html. |
|||
Revision as of 23:38, 26 February 2014
 | This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
This article needs to be restarted from the ground up. The entire text is unencyclopedic heavily POV. --Milkmandan 09:05, 2005 Feb 25 (UTC)
I agree. I am a Honda tech of 7 years, but also a Yamaha, Suzuki and Kawasaki tech -- this article is not only biased, but inaccurate. Needs to be revised with better knowledge of the 900RR's history. --[User:kinako mochi] 04:34, 2005 Jun 17
Sounds a bit like a bike review rather than an entry. -- Leitmotif 12:35, 2005 Jul 6 (GMT+2)
Have done my best to remove some of the more glaring emotive language. I'm not completely certain of the technical details, so I'll leave those for some more qualified soul to improve upon. -- Leitmotif 22:11, 2005 Aug 18 (GMT+2)
The text here would pass for unbiased in any bike magazine, but there is another problem. The CBR900 series is the same thing as the Honda Fireblade series, which already has a large and detailed article. This article should just redirect to [[23]]
- Or the other way 'round! The Fireblade page should redirect here (and its content stolen and placed here), as CBR900RR is the bike's model name (Fireblade is its marketing name, of which, for a particular model, there may be more than one). With this particular model it is not such a problem, but where there are two or more marketing names (neither of which is the model name, e.g., Firestorm and Super Hawk, both for VTR1000F), keeping the model-named page the main page, and the other names redirects, makes a lot of sense. That said, the Fireblade page needs some grammar work (I wonder which language it was originally!) JZH
Did some re-working of the article based on the 20th Anniversary articles on http://world.honda.com/CBR1000RR/history/index.html.