Jump to content

Talk:Instagram: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Reverted to revision 678631971 by Altamel (talk): Rvv. (TW)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{GA nominee|08:25, 28 October 2015 (UTC)|nominator=[[Special:Contributions/122.170.67.141|122.170.67.141]] ([[User talk:122.170.67.141|talk]])|page=1|subtopic=Computing and engineering|status=|note=}}
{{Talk header}}
{{Talk header}}
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=

Revision as of 08:25, 28 October 2015

AfD

I hope my changes were sufficient to save this article from deletion. The information is barebones, but accurate. aszekely (talk) 20:31, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Updated the article for accuracy from an official source. Jzollman (talk) 20:56, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Terms of use

The Instagram#Users section currently contains a rather lengthy paragraph on the subject of Instagram's Terms of Service. It is very important for the TOS information to be conveyed in this article; however the current text seems to be copied verbatim from Instagram's website. What do others think about rephrasing this text to paraphrase the TOS (essentially, going for brevity without sacrificing accuracy)? Jeff Bedford (talk) 18:06, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your suggestion sounds excellent to me. — Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 18:00, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Also, could there be a look up as to pornography/indecent photos within the terms of use? IbinjaminSpirit (talk) 17:50, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that this page for Instagram has no mention of the trends that have sprouted and become popular through Instagram, like the weekend hashtag challenge, "throw back thursdays", and "the rich kids of instagram". I thought that it would be interesting to include and comment on these trends to provide a better idea of what really goes on within the Instagram community. LeSeine (talk) 22:11, 16 August 2012 (UTC)leSeine[reply]

If you can find a reliable source detailing these trends, then be bold and add the info! David1217 What I've done 21:25, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No, that's not enough. Just because someone is using Instagram, and starting a trend, and that trend gets some "human interest" article, does not mean it belongs in this article. WP:DUE applies here. We would need to show that any given trend is of significant importance to the bigger history of Instagram, not just that it happened to spike enough to reach mainstream media one day. Qwyrxian (talk) 03:00, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Though you can argue that any given trend may not be of any significant importance to the overall history of Instagram, I do believe that they do show and say a great deal about the Instagram community - perhaps, even Instagram culture. I thought that providing some insight into the kinds of trends that form within that community would be an interesting category to add to the article to provide a greater understanding of how Instagram works and how participants are connected with one another. For example, I think that the Weekend Hashtag Project is a project that truly encompasses so much of what Instagram is about. LeSeine (talk) 23:25, 19 August 2012 (UTC)leSeine[reply]
Also, it is under the 'Popularity' section of the article, so I thought listing trends would be appropriate. I thought that the 'Musicians' subsection also displayed somewhat of a trend that is very similar to the way the Weekend Hashtag Project works. LeSeine (talk) 23:31, 19 August 2012 (UTC)leSeine[reply]

Criticism section?

No criticism section? A lot of people seem to have realised that Instagram effects are derivative and tacky by now. 31.53.189.225 (talk) 02:32, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As a general rule, {[WP:NPOV]] recommends against criticism sections. However, if there has been legitimate criticism published in reliable sources (i.e., not forums, not blogs), then we can consider inclusion somewhere in the article. Qwyrxian (talk) 02:54, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot sign up for Instagram on their website. I thought that belonged there somehow 98.221.181.197 (talk) 05:31, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You need a secondary source discussing the matter: i.e., evidence that a reliable source has said that this is important information in some way. Qwyrxian (talk) 05:33, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I totally agree with you, Qwyrxian. I don't think it is relevant to have a Criticism section without citing a reliable source. Also, even if this section is included, I believe it has to be in the most neutral point of view possible. Cheers, Zalunardo8 (talk) 13:40, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Off topic chat

YOU MUST BE AT LEAST 13 YEARS OlD — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.178.149.52 (talk) 06:10, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My criticism of instagram is that you can not edit the description once you post it. (I'd love to edit my typo and other mistakes.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.40.95.254 (talk) 22:45, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Article talk pages are for discussing improvements to the article, not for general discussion of the topic. - SummerPhD (talk) 05:05, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Confused

"Following the revert changes to previously available terms and conditions, under the San Diego-based law, the company itself fill the class action lawsuit against the changes of the terms and conditions which had made last week that has breached the privacy of the user’s photo" asdfsdf Could this sentence be any more confusing?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.72.157.115 (talkcontribs)

It makes absolutely no sense, nor does the other lawsuit info added. I don't have time to summarize it right now, and I'm not even certain it's important enough to go in at all; we don't report on every single lawsuit that a company faces, especially not right after the suit is filed. At a minimum the sections need to be rephrased, but, more likely, we should just leave the info out for now until we know that this will be a longterm, important part of Instagram history. I'm moving all of the info and refs here in case anyone wants to work on it. Qwyrxian (talk) 11:07, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Lawsuit info pulled from article
From lead

Following the revert changes to previously available terms and conditions, under the San Diego-based law, the company itself fill the class action lawsuit against the changes of the terms and conditions which had made last week that has breached the privacy of the user’s photo.<ref name="Lawsuit 1">{{cite web |title=Not snap-happy: Instagram hit with first class-action lawsuit after changes to TOS |publisher=[[Russia Today|RT]] |url=http://rt.com/news/instagram-lawsuit-agreement-changes-784/ |accessdate=2012-12-25}}</ref><ref name="Lawsuit 2">{{cite web |title=Class action suit filed against Instagram over ToS changes |publisher=Business Journal |url=http://www.bizjournals.com/sanjose/news/2012/12/24/report-suit-filed-against-instagram.html |accessdate=2012-12-25}}</ref><ref name="Lawsuit 3">{{cite web |title=Happy Holidays, Instagram! Here, Have a Class-Action Lawsuit. |publisher=[[Wall Street Journal|WSJ]] |url=http://allthingsd.com/20121224/happy-holidays-instagram-here-have-a-class-action-lawsuit/ |accessdate=2012-12-25}}</ref>

From body

Following the revert changes to terms and conditions which had made in 2010, the company itself faced the class action lawsuit against the changes of the terms and conditions which had made last week.<ref name="Lawsuit 1" /><ref name="Lawsuit 2" /><ref name="Lawsuit 3" /> The San Diego-based law firm claims that user’s rights had been forfeited even the user has removed their accounts from Instagram.<ref name="Lawsuit 4">{{cite web |title=Instagram Hit With Class Action Lawsuit Related To Last Week’s Change Of Service Terms |publisher=[[TechCrunch]] |url=http://techcrunch.com/2012/12/24/instagram-hit-with-class-action-lawsuit-related-to-last-weeks-change-of-service-terms/ |accessdate=2012-12-25}}</ref>

Refs

The section Instagram#Related_products_and_services smells a bit too promo-y for my liking, and is mainly sourced to one (old) MacWorld article. I'm inclined to remove it, but I'd like the community's input. —Theopolisme (talk) 12:30, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think there should be some definitely related items to drive home how many accessories there are. 100 Cameras needs to be removed as there are many apps that can directly export to IG Glman99 ☲☳☶ (talk) 15:27, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I agree wholeheartedly. I'll look around for a comprehensive IG accessories article—numbers would be great, and any of the more quirky accessories should definitely stay in (provided they've been covered in reliable sources, of course). —Theopolisme (talk) 15:39, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with you. New worl (talk) 00:31, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Android controversy?

Should there be a section on the criticism Instagram got when they released a version of it on Android back in April 2012? I think it would show an interesting relationship between iPhone and Android users, and the overall class warfare prevalent in the US. If you didn't know, when it was released on Android, many iPhone fans complained that "we would see poor people food" in their social network. It illustrates the current class issues modern America still deals with. Thoughts? 50.36.94.209 (talk) 23:43, 25 April 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.36.94.209 (talk) 23:40, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BEBOLD...or I'll work on it tonight. Some sources: [1][2][3]Theopolisme (talk) 11:02, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Error in Infobox software - Stable release - Citation tags shown

Hi, there's an error in the Infobox software, the tags of the citation sources are shown, but I don't know how to fix it :( --AlbertJB (talk) 08:18, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Fixed The Anonymouse (talk) 04:16, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Emily White has the vision to turn an Instagram profit in a year

Emily White comes to Instagram for her vision. She creates a corporate message and slogan: "Capture and share the world's moments!"[4]Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 05:38, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, a corporate leader has a corporate slogan. How do you believe that should go into the article in a neutral way? Qwyrxian (talk) 06:13, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done — Good comment, Qwyrxian. I was going to quote Dragnet Joe Friday, "Just the facts, ..., just the facts." Good job adding the new paragraph, Soulparadox. I'm sure there will be more to add as Instagram finds a larger 'footprint' in the coming year. — Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 18:47, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FYI: Continuing the path to profitability, after being aquired by Facebook, here's the first of an ad campaign:

Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 04:11, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can you send an Instagram to a LinkedIn discussion group?

The first footnote reference in the article is getting old (2010) and says you can filter and send to several social media networks: such as, "social networking services, such as Facebook, Twitter, Tumblr and Flickr." What about LinkedIn? -- Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 23:38, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Charles, no (at least not directly -- there obviously third party solutions that add more sharing options, but these are not in the standard application). Currently, you can share your photos on a photo-by-photo basis on Flickr, Facebook, and Twitter. [...] Going forward, we plan on supporting additional services but have nothing else to announce at this time (Instagram FAQ). Theopolisme (talk) 00:29, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Theopolisme. I am also studying Instagram help and blog information. I've learned that videos can also be added: "Where will my video appear on Instagram? Like photos you share, your video will appear on your profile and in-feed."[5]Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 19:20, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Windows Phone App

Instagram has released a Windows Phone app. Currently in Beta, it is the official app:

http://blog.instagram.com/post/67574689360/instagramforwindowsphone

http://www.windowsphone.com/en-us/store/app/instagram-beta/3222a126-7f20-4273-ab4a-161120b21aea — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ieatfishes (talkcontribs) 20:08, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 24 December 2013

Hi, I've noticed that there is no mention of the app situation for BlackBerry_10. In BlackBerry World (right now) there are several apps for people to use Instagram. The most obvious being "BlackGram", its made by AppStars, and it allows pretty much all functionality. There are also several "viewer" type apps. Can you correct or enhance the Wikipedia entry on Instagram to show the BlackBerry_10 devices have access to a functional app for Instagram. More details here http://crackberry.com/blackgram-updated-loads-improvements 62.208.147.211 (talk) 13:49, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done I've added this information to the lead, with a link directly to that app on Blackberry World. --ElHef (Meep?) 15:48, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

iPad capabilities

I couldn't write this myself, but could you try to add information about the iPad not able to upload videos onto Instagram? Thanks BrandonWu (talk) 21:22, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Screenshot

Please don't post screenshots with you own profiles' or non-popular profiles. If you want to take a screenshot take it for notable profiles like @playstation or @instagram --Kuwaity26 (talk) 20:01, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Changing lede to say it's for mobile devices, i.e., not computers

I find it kind of funny that Instagram does not have an application for computers. I'm thinking of changing the lede sentence as follows (see italics):

Instagram is an online photo-sharing, video-sharing and social networking service for mobile devices that enables its users to take pictures and videos, apply digital filters to them, and share them on a variety of social networking services, such as Facebook, Twitter, Tumblr and Flickr.

However, I suppose anyone can sign up online with a computer so they can comment on and follow users? Raquel Baranow (talk) 19:23, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, can't log in (sign up) without downloading a mobile application. **Confused** Raquel Baranow (talk) 19:53, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You can download to your computer a program such as BlueStacks, which allows you to follow users and comment on their photos. Also note, the lede was changed. Raquel Baranow (talk) 18:58, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 20 March 2014

In the section history please replace: "In its largest acquisition deal to date" with: "In its second largest acquisition deal to date"

WhatsApp has been acquired by facebook for a higher valuation. references:

 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WhatsApp
 http://www.forbes.com/sites/adamhartung/2014/02/24/zuckerbergs-3-smart-leadership-lessons-from-facebook-buying-whatsapp/

Kirkite (talk) 12:56, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done Sam Sailor Sing 18:46, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Response to request to give filter descriptions

  • Normal: No filter applied
  • Amaro: Adds light to an image, with the focus on the centre. <ref>{{cite web|title=The Essential Guide to Using Instagram Filters like a Pro|url=http://thenextweb.com/lifehacks/2012/11/22/the-essential-guide-to-using-instagram-filters-like-a-pro/2/|publisher=The Next Web|accessdate=10 April 2014}}</ref>
  • Mayfair: Applies a warm pink tone, subtle vignetting to brighten the photograph center and a thin black border<ref>{{cite web|title=Instagram’s Newest Filter: Mayfair|url=http://blog.instagram.com/post/38546919409/instagrams-newest-filter-mayfair-yesterdays|publisher=Instagram|accessdate=10 April 2014}}</ref>
  • Rise: Adds a 'glow' to the image, with softer lighting of the subject.
  • Hudson: Creates an 'icy' illusion with heightened shadows, cool tint and dodged center.<ref>{{cite web|title=How to Choose the Best Instagram Filter for your Photo|url=http://mashable.com/2012/07/19/instagram-filters/#gallery/instagram-filters/50d3365fb589e40263005b89|publisher=Mashable|accessdate=10 April 2014}}</ref> .
  • Valencia: Fades the image by increasing exposure and warming the colors, to give it an antique feel
  • X-Pro II: Increases color vibrance with a golden tint, high contrast and slight vignette added to the edges.
  • Sierra: Gives a faded, softer look.
  • Willow: A monocramatic filter with subtle purple tones and a translucent white border.<ref>{{cite web|title=Instagram’s Newest Filter: Willow|url=http://blog.instagram.com/post/37739409065/instagrams-newest-filter-willow-yesterdays|publisher=Instagram|accessdate=10 April 2014}}</ref>
  • Lo-fi: Enriches color and adds strong shadows through the use of saturation and 'warming' the temperature.
  • Earlybird: Gives photographs an older look with a sepia tint and warm temperature.
  • Sutro: Burns photo edges, increases highlights and shadows dramatically with a focus on purple and brown colors.
  • Toaster: Ages the image by 'burning' the centre and adds a dramatic vignette.
  • Brannan: Increases contrast and exposure and adds a metallic tint.
  • Inkwell: Direct shift to black and white - no extra editing.
  • Walden: Increases exposure and adds a yellow tint.
  • Hefe: High contrast and saturation, with a similar effect to Lo-Fi but not quite as dramatic.
  • Nashville: Warms the temperature, lowers contrast and increases exposure to give a light 'pink' tint - making it feel 'nostalgic'.
  • 1977: The increased exposure with a red tint gives the photograph a rosy, brighter, faded look.
  • Kelvin: Increases saturation and temperature to give it a radiant 'glow'. <ref name=filters>{{cite news|last=Garber|first=Megan|title=A Guide to the Instagram Filters You'll Soon Be Seeing on Facebook|url=http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/04/a-guide-to-the-instagram-filters-youll-soon-be-seeing-on-facebook/255650/|accessdate=4 November 2013|newspaper=The Atlantic|date=10 April 2012}}</ref>

Morganglick (talk) 15:05, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kodak Instamatic

It says: "A distinctive feature is that it confines photos to a square shape, similar to Kodak Instamatic and Polaroid images"

Kodak Instamatic pictures were not square (126 and 110 film).— Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.170.1.2 (talkcontribs) 22:06, 8 August 2014‎

126 film is square. --McGeddon (talk) 21:33, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You're right for 126 film but 110 film (13 × 17 mm) isn't square.

Semi-protected edit request on 10 September 2014

Instagram haven't accepted the deal with facebbok. Like said the french wikipedia article about instagram ( http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instagram#Controverses ) they refused it in december 2012 because facebook don't respect the therme of the contract 80.185.68.173 (talk) 09:53, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: Reliable sources such as Forbes, Wall Street Journal and others all state that Instagram has been bought by Facebook. In addition to that, the section on the french wikipedia you linked to does not contain any mention of facebook, it only mentions critisism for censorship.--Snaevar (talk) 20:10, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 28 October 2014

GIMME PERMISSION TO EDIT STUFF MOTHERFUCKER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Cokecan21 (talk) 14:48, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done This is not the right page to request additional user rights.
If you want to suggest a change, please request this, politely, in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ".
Please also cite reliable sources to back up your request. - Arjayay (talk) 15:00, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

I propose that Instagram Shop be merged with Instagram. The content in the Instagram Shop article could easily be condensed to a small section in the Instagram article commenting on the phenomenon of people selling goods using Instagram. Jc86035 (talkcontributions) Use {{ping|Jc86035}} to reply to me 10:44, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Jc86035: I do not think that Instagram Shop should be merged with Instagram. First, Instagram Shop actually is a phenomenon or commercial activity among Instagram users, but not an function provided by Instagram officially. Second, the information in Instagram should mainly focus on the official function and the major feature of Instagram itself. It will be better to creat a link of Instagram Shop in the "See also" part of Instagram, so that people can link to Instagram Shop to have more knowledge. Alvinz00 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alvinz00 (talkcontribs) 12:45, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Jc86035: I aGree with Alvinz00 and i don't think it should be merged! aGastya  ✉ let's talk about it :) 03:45, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. I think Instagram Shop doesn't meet notability guidelines and the article itself is of very low quality. The fact that some people use Instagram as a shopfront could be stated as a single sentence and if any link were needed, it would be to the article that talks about using social media as a marketing and store-front tool as a general concept and not specific to Instagram. Orayzio (talk) 18:39, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Pheed

Hello. Pheed is a spamming company that trys to spam websites. Please delete " such as Pheed, a multi-media social sharing platform launched in November 2012 that gained more new users than any other app in the U.S. the week that Instagram changed its terms of service.[46]" because I am almost certin that was written in by one of Pheed staff. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.61.162.186 (talk) 02:01, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This whole paragraph does seem a bit excessive and unlikely to pass the WP:10YEARS test, I've cut it back to just "former users switched to other Instagram-like services, which reported an increase in usage". --McGeddon (talk) 10:28, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A free software is not just available to download free of charge. I don't think Instagram is a free software so I removed the category. --Quest for Truth (talk) 09:33, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And I restored it. There is no other reasonable definition of "free software" other thsn "free of charge". BMK (talk) 09:37, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
"Freeware" is the term for a software which is "free of charge", and should not be confused with "free software". The word "free" in "free software" refers to "freedom", as in "freedom of speech". Users are allowed to freely modify and distribute the modified version of a free software. The developer of Instagram does not give their users such freedom, so Instagram should not be called a free software. --Quest for Truth (talk) 10:07, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, Category:Free mobile software is a subcat of Category:Free software which defines itself as "a category of articles relating to software that meets The Free Software Definition". --McGeddon (talk) 10:15, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 7 July 2015

Related products and services

long product description
*     Hashtag Pirate is a service that allows to search instagram with multiple hashtags, lets say you would like to see certain images in Madrid, you search for #madrid #Selfie & guess what? Our search will filter & show you those selfies in madrid! We took instagram search to another level.
*     100 Cameras in 1 is an app available for iPhone users that provides additional effects for photos uploaded to Instagram.[107]
*     6tag is an official alternate client Instagram for Windows Phone developed by Rudy Huyn. Often the app is considered better than the official, it has constant updates.[108][109]
*     iGrann is an unofficial alternate Instagram client for BlackBerry 10 developed by Adrian Sacchi.[110]
*     Inst10 is an unofficial alternate Instagram client for BlackBerry 10 developed by Nemory Studios.[111]
*     Carousel, for Macs, is an app that provides a live feed of Instagram on the Mac.[107]
*     Gramatica – is an app that gives Instagram users additional photo album options, such as: pinch/zoom, hide photo, and create lists.
*     Hyperlapse - an app that allows users to create digitally stabilized time-lapse videos.[112]
*     Iconosquare is a free app that provides personal statistics related to Instagram, including number of followers, likes, and comments, along with usage statistics.[107]
*     Instagram & Printing – Instaprint offers a device which can be rented for social gatherings that allows users to print photographs on Instagram.[107] Printsgram allows a user's Instagram collection to be printed as a poster or stickers.[107]
*     Instamap is an app available for iPad that allows users of Instagram to find photos based on their location or a hashtag. Results can be displayed in a gallery or linked to a map.[107]
*     Picfx - a photography app that provides over 100 effects, textures and frames and allows one to share h finished photo on social networks
*     Printic - an app which offers one of the easiest ways to print and share Instagram pictures from an iPhone. Pictures come in a vintage 3x4 inches (7.62x10.16 cm) format, with an orange envelope and a message for the recipient.[107]
*     Socialmatic – a prototype physical digital camera, which housing is designed to look like the Instagram icon. The camera is designed with 16 GB of storage, Wi-Fi and Bluetooth capability, the ability to interface with the Instagram app, and the ability to produce color prints.

HashtagPirate (talk) 10:28, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: Looks like an attempt to promote Hashtag pirate. No WP:RS provided, no sources really, your link is to an email account. Cannolis (talk) 10:34, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 29 August 2015

Change A distinctive feature is that it confines photos to a square shape, similar to Kodak Instamatic and Polaroid images, in contrast to the 4:3 aspect ratio typically used by mobile device cameras.

to

An original distinctive feature was that it confined photos to a square shape, similar to Kodak Instamatic and Polaroid images, in contrast to the 4:3 aspect ratio typical used by mobile device cameras. In August 2015, version 7.5 of the was released, allowing users to post photos captured in portrait or landscape orientation.

Davidjschloss (talk) 17:30, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thanks. Altamel (talk) 17:07, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]