User talk:Akshayzine13: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:15, 22 March 2017

Welcome!

Hello, Akshayzine13, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Namita Dubey, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Church ^Talk 18:51, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Namita Dubey

The article Namita Dubey has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no reliable references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Church ^Talk 18:51, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Church and Akshayzine13, I wanted to let you both know that I've added a few sources to this entry and so removed the proposal for deletion. I see Akshayzine13 is just getting started editing and so I hope having a few examples in this regard could be useful! I've also listed some additional sources on Talk:Namita_Dubey that might be worth examining to see if they could help expand the entry--the principle is that everything you add to WP should have a reliable sources (even if it's something you know to be true, like Dubey appearing this TV show--the idea is to provide a link so anyone who wants to can verify). As Church mentioned, this is explained in much greater detail at Referencing for beginners. Hope that helps, and welcome! Innisfree987 (talk) 00:30, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Akshay zine

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello. A tag has been placed on Akshay zine requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Kinetic37 (talk) 09:47, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Akshay Zine

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Akshay Zine requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I'm been doing} 20:17, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Please do not write or add to an article about yourself, as you apparently did at Akshay Zine. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I'm been doing} 20:18, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Urfi Javed, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:10, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not blank pages, as you did with this edit to Charvi Saraf, because it is considered vandalism; instead, use the sandbox for testing. If you think the page should be deleted, see here for what to do. Thank you. Marianna251TALK 16:23, 4 November 2016 (UTC) [reply]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Humaima Malick. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Marianna251TALK 16:24, 4 November 2016 (UTC) [reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Charvi Saraf, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Marianna251TALK 16:25, 4 November 2016 (UTC) [reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Charvi Saraf. Marianna251TALK 16:42, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've struck out the warnings above after the discussion on my talk page, because I think you're not acting maliciously, just not sure what to do in this case, so the warnings aren't fair. Please let me know if you need any more help! Marianna251TALK 17:25, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Humaima Malick. I noticed that when you added the image to the infobox, you added it as a thumbnail. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this:

|image=[[File:SomeImage.jpg|thumb|Some image caption]]

Instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do:

|image=SomeImage.jpg.

There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as |caption=Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks! Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 18:49, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Humaima Malick

The warnings you are placing on this page are very inappropriate. Please use caution and review WP:COI. --Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 18:50, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Promotional editing

Through your edits and apparent self-admission you are editing on behalf of clients. Such editing is very strongly discouraged on Wikipedia as it creates a conflict of interest. If you are receiving any financial return for such edits you must disclose it according to our Terms of Use. Also, I have no idea why you would create an article, then request deletion several days later asserting you had made it all up - such edits are disruptive, please don't continue them.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:22, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gibran Noorani for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gibran Noorani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gibran Noorani until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kleuske (talk) 11:14, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay try not to delete Kleuske thanks for informing me

November 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gibran Noorani, you may be blocked from editing. Chris Troutman (talk) 09:41, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I Have not removed and never did disruptive editing for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gibran Noorani it is still there

This is the edit I'm addressing. You are not allowed to close deletion discussions. (That wasn't even the correct way.) You will have to wait until Wikipedia editors reach consensus about the article. Chris Troutman (talk) 11:14, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I found no issue in Gibran Noorani

November 2016

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Gibran Noorani, did not appear constructive and has been undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. AllyD (talk) 21:41, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mona Darling copyright problem

Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:07, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Varun Gupta (Marketing Director)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Varun Gupta (Marketing Director), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — Gorthian (talk) 06:21, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Manveer Gurjar

Hell there, I redirect your article Manveer Gurjar to Bigg Boss 10 because the subject is notable only for one event so please do not revert and see WP:BLP1E. Thank you – GSS (talk|c|em) 09:11, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shivam Babbar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shivam Babbar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shivam Babbar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GSS (talk|c|em) 10:33, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Namita Dubey for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Namita Dubey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Namita Dubey until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GSS (talk|c|em) 11:25, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shivam Babbar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shivam Babbar, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GSS (talk|c|em) 08:58, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rapper Maddy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rapper Maddy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rapper Maddy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GSS (talk|c|em) 06:54, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:GSS-1987Please search in google for his notability! there is google preview for him and now you are submitting it for deletion.. ? ~Akshay~ 08:51, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dr Seema Midha

The article Dr Seema Midha has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Adem20^talk 17:10, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this information. I created because I found one Media article that in she is very well known person bollywood! so created it

Revision as of 17:10, 22 March 2017 edit Adem20 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 12,304 edits Notification: proposed deletion of Dr Seema Midha. (TW) ← Previous edit		Revision as of 17:15, 22 March 2017 edit undo Akshayzine13 (talk \| contribs) 230 edits →‎Proposed deletion of Dr Seema Midha Next edit →
Line 137:		Line 137:

	If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see [[Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners\|Referencing for beginners]], or ask at the [[Wikipedia:Help desk\|help desk]]. Once you have provided at least one [[WP:V#Sources\|reliable source]], you may remove the {{tl\|prod blp/dated}} tag. '''Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced.''' If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can {{#ifexist:Dr Seema Midha\|request that it be undeleted\|[[Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion\|request that it be undeleted]]}} when you are ready to add one.<!-- Template:ProdwarningBLP --> [[User:Adem20\|Adem20]]<sup>[[User talk:Adem20\|talk]]</sup> 17:10, 22 March 2017 (UTC)		If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see [[Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners\|Referencing for beginners]], or ask at the [[Wikipedia:Help desk\|help desk]]. Once you have provided at least one [[WP:V#Sources\|reliable source]], you may remove the {{tl\|prod blp/dated}} tag. '''Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced.''' If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can {{#ifexist:Dr Seema Midha\|request that it be undeleted\|[[Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion\|request that it be undeleted]]}} when you are ready to add one.<!-- Template:ProdwarningBLP --> [[User:Adem20\|Adem20]]<sup>[[User talk:Adem20\|talk]]</sup> 17:10, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

			Thank you for this information. I created because I found one Media article that in she is very well known person bollywood! so created it