User talk:Akshayzine13

Welcome!

Hello, Akshayzine13, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Namita Dubey, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Church ^Talk 18:51, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Namita Dubey

The article Namita Dubey has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no reliable references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Church ^Talk 18:51, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Church and Akshayzine13, I wanted to let you both know that I've added a few sources to this entry and so removed the proposal for deletion. I see Akshayzine13 is just getting started editing and so I hope having a few examples in this regard could be useful! I've also listed some additional sources on Talk:Namita_Dubey that might be worth examining to see if they could help expand the entry--the principle is that everything you add to WP should have a reliable sources (even if it's something you know to be true, like Dubey appearing this TV show--the idea is to provide a link so anyone who wants to can verify). As Church mentioned, this is explained in much greater detail at Referencing for beginners. Hope that helps, and welcome! Innisfree987 (talk) 00:30, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Akshay zine

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello. A tag has been placed on Akshay zine requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Kinetic37 (talk) 09:47, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Akshay Zine

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Akshay Zine requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I'm been doing} 20:17, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Please do not write or add to an article about yourself, as you apparently did at Akshay Zine. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I'm been doing} 20:18, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Urfi Javed, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:10, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not blank pages, as you did with this edit to Charvi Saraf, because it is considered vandalism; instead, use the sandbox for testing. If you think the page should be deleted, see here for what to do. Thank you. Marianna251TALK 16:23, 4 November 2016 (UTC) [reply]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Humaima Malick. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Marianna251TALK 16:24, 4 November 2016 (UTC) [reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Charvi Saraf, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Marianna251TALK 16:25, 4 November 2016 (UTC) [reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Charvi Saraf. Marianna251TALK 16:42, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've struck out the warnings above after the discussion on my talk page, because I think you're not acting maliciously, just not sure what to do in this case, so the warnings aren't fair. Please let me know if you need any more help! Marianna251TALK 17:25, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Humaima Malick. I noticed that when you added the image to the infobox, you added it as a thumbnail. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this:

|image=[[File:SomeImage.jpg|thumb|Some image caption]]

Instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do:

|image=SomeImage.jpg.

There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as |caption=Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks! Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 18:49, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Humaima Malick

The warnings you are placing on this page are very inappropriate. Please use caution and review WP:COI. --Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 18:50, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Promotional editing

Through your edits and apparent self-admission you are editing on behalf of clients. Such editing is very strongly discouraged on Wikipedia as it creates a conflict of interest. If you are receiving any financial return for such edits you must disclose it according to our Terms of Use. Also, I have no idea why you would create an article, then request deletion several days later asserting you had made it all up - such edits are disruptive, please don't continue them.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:22, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gibran Noorani for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gibran Noorani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gibran Noorani until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kleuske (talk) 11:14, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay try not to delete Kleuske thanks for informing me

November 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gibran Noorani, you may be blocked from editing. Chris Troutman (talk) 09:41, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I Have not removed and never did disruptive editing for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gibran Noorani it is still there

This is the edit I'm addressing. You are not allowed to close deletion discussions. (That wasn't even the correct way.) You will have to wait until Wikipedia editors reach consensus about the article. Chris Troutman (talk) 11:14, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I found no issue in Gibran Noorani

November 2016

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Gibran Noorani, did not appear constructive and has been undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. AllyD (talk) 21:41, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mona Darling copyright problem

Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:07, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Varun Gupta (Marketing Director)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Varun Gupta (Marketing Director), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — Gorthian (talk) 06:21, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Manveer Gurjar

Hell there, I redirect your article Manveer Gurjar to Bigg Boss 10 because the subject is notable only for one event so please do not revert and see WP:BLP1E. Thank you – GSS (talk|c|em) 09:11, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shivam Babbar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shivam Babbar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shivam Babbar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GSS (talk|c|em) 10:33, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Namita Dubey for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Namita Dubey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Namita Dubey until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GSS (talk|c|em) 11:25, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shivam Babbar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shivam Babbar, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GSS (talk|c|em) 08:58, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rapper Maddy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rapper Maddy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rapper Maddy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GSS (talk|c|em) 06:54, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:GSS-1987Please search in google for his notability! there is google preview for him and now you are submitting it for deletion.. ? ~Akshay~ 08:51, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dr Seema Midha

The article Dr Seema Midha has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Adem20^talk 17:10, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this information. I created because I found one Media article that in she is very well known person bollywood! so created it

Speedy deletion nomination of Dr Seema Midha

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dr Seema Midha, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. AllyD (talk) 17:42, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Dr Seema Midha, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. AllyD (talk) 17:47, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nitesh Yadav

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nitesh Yadav requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —usernamekiran(talk) 09:53, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Taanaji : The Unsung Warrior

Hi, I'm Domdeparis. Akshayzine13, thanks for creating Taanaji : The Unsung Warrior!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. probably WP:TOOSOON

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Domdeparis (talk) 18:57, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of RVCJ Media

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on RVCJ Media, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:43, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

== RVCJ Media is not promotional Article, please review my previous article I don't create article for promotion, I Write because I find it has to be on wikipedia, have a look at references once. ~Akshay~ 06:54, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Nitesh Yadav for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nitesh Yadav is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nitesh Yadav until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mar11 (talk) 11:46, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pankaj Kumar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Pankaj Kumar, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cabayi (talk) 16:05, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, but I’ve not created this article for promotion I found this singer needs to be on wikipedia as he has verified facebook page. & well popular songs on the name... ~Akshay~ 16:13, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Pankaj Kumar, to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. I'm sorry to be in the position where I need to issue this caution but you have a long record of creating articles on non-notable topics despite all the advice given. Please consider how notable a subject is before creating an article - a Facebook page is NOT evidence of notability - and use the article wizard to start your articles. Cabayi (talk) 20:12, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tasha Hayaat

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tasha Hayaat requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 21:41, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tasha Hayaat (November 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drewmutt was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Additionally links to YouTube don't help establish notability suitable enough for inclusion.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tasha Hayaat and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 23:02, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Akshayzine13, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 23:02, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tasha Hayaat (December 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Joe Decker was:

As near as I can tell, no attempt has been made to correct the issues raised in the previous review.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tasha Hayaat and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

joe decker ^talk 15:58, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Akshayzine13, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Saqib (talk) 16:33, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Per the above sockpuppetry investigation (SPI), it seems clear that you are the same person as Abbasizaibi, who was indefinitely blocked in 2016 for using Wikipedia for spamming / advertising. Accordingly, I've indefinitely blocked you for sockpuppetry and evading a block. See the notice below. — Rich wales (no relation to Jimbo) 08:03, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. — Rich wales (no relation to Jimbo) 07:59, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Akshayzine13 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the person you're thinking thats me is wrong, i never did advertising and never known that person your mentioned. i don't know why you blocked me. please unblock as just noticed few days before i have been blocked. I don't even know that guy who did advertising

Decline reason:

You say you don't know why you've been blocked. You clearly do know why. Additionally, you did not address the evidence shown at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Abbasizaibi/Archive. I also have off-wiki evidence that you work for a marketing company and cannot see where you disclosed your conflict of interest and paid status. I suppose this isn't particularly relevant to this particular unblock request, but should be taken into account by other admins who are ever thinking of unblocking you. Yamla (talk) 11:11, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Draft:Tasha Hayaat concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Tasha Hayaat, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 5 May 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Akshayzine13 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #22270 was submitted on Aug 04, 2018 07:20:16. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 07:20, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Manveer Gurjar

The article Manveer Gurjar has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Jmertel23 (talk) 12:53, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Manveer Gurjar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Manveer Gurjar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manveer Gurjar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ~ GB fan 12:19, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Taanaji : The Unsung Warrior listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Taanaji : The Unsung Warrior. Since you had some involvement with the Taanaji : The Unsung Warrior redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Rush922(talk) 03:48, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Akshayzine13 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello I've been blocked on this account on 20th January 2018, after appealing once and not accepting the fact the reason I was blocked was not true, I created another account to start editing User:Iamzine13 I made more than 270 Non deleted Mainspace edits within a month. and again with another account, I found to be a sockpuppet of some another person which is also not true. all my life I have ever created only these two accounts. I'm requesting you to unblock my this User:Akshayzine13 account or the second account which has Extended confirmed user rights User:Iamzine13 I want to continue editing and contributing English Wikipedia in terms of Vandalism & Cleanup. If I have done vandalism I apologize and Promise you that it won't happen again I'll be very careful about the policies of Wikipedia while editing or creating articles. Thank you I'm hoping for the best you could do. blocking admin on this account @Richwales: declined by @Yamla: & On my new account blocking admin @Bbb23: declined by User:yamla. All I'm asking is give me another chance. ~Akshay~ 12:56, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

High on the list of "Things Wikipedia does not need" is more paid marketers. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:10, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blanking

You are not permitted to blank unblock declines for current blocks. Do not do so again, please. --Yamla (talk) 14:58, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Akshayzine13 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi admins/checkusers It's been very long time after my this account got blocked for unfair reason I stopped visiting wikipedia for certain period. later I created new account User:Iamzine13 which was also got blocked for being a sockpuppet for some Abhishek user I after that I created one more account without understanding how exactly sockpuppetry is investigated. I did a lot of digging and find out that whenever in future I'll create new account even if I create from different computer I'll be suspected due to my editing behaviour. which I can't change (behaviour) I want to edit on Wikipedia, I will not do promotional articles and I will only be editing in the area of cleaning up articles. participate in AFD debates if necessary. i will not create direct articles! at least not until I learn about policies. and I checked about this account why this has been blocked. Abasi user created an article Humaima Malick and got deleted. back then I did not know in deep about deletion log checking, and a lot stuff, I knew only if you have 10 edits you can create article with articles. Humaima's Manager posted in some group on facebook if anyone can create wikipedia article. I knew that I could so, I said yes. I'm from india & abbasi is from Pakistan I asked that guy who asked me to write about Humaima and he said yes he asked abbasi also. but got deleted and I just wanted to clear the air. and keep the rest accounts blocked. I just want my real & only account activated this. it has my real name Akshay Zine and my bith date 13 July. you can check my Facebook Profile my humble request is please unblock me I will keep my promise! If I do any single mistake I wont open wikipedia again. I'll make sure I'm following all the policies and terms of wikipedia while editing. ~Akshay~ (talk) 20:54, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The evidence in the original SPI still seems convincing to me. GoldenRing (talk) 14:41, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Richwales: please review my block once again ~Akshay~ (talk) 22:07, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Making One More Unblock Request With Explaining and Apologising

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Akshayzine13 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'll only speak for myself and why SPI has the evidence against me, I had recently joined Wikipedia back then and was excited about it, so I thought of making money by creating some articles, without knowing WP:PAID and WP:COI I accept everything you have against me except I'm the same person who I have been found of, User:Abbasizaibi because here is the reason why We have similar edits, Person named Hyre dada (from Pakistan) contacted me for creating an article for her client Humaima Malick and I said yes I'll create an article for her, here is the screenshot[1] [2] I was New and Unexperienced user I did not know about checking logs, etc.. before creating an article which was previously deleted, without understanding anything I started writing (The content was given by Hyere Himself) I copy pasted it, that is why Checkuser has Evidence against me for being a sock, I also made some promotional edits I swear I never knew about the policies back then, Now I understand almost most of the policies, I accept All my previous edits were in WP:COI Except Namita Dubey which are deleted, about RVCJ Media Yes I Used to work with them, thats the reason I started that article, without disclosing Conflict of interest, becauseI did not know about the Disclosure policy and I'm sorry for that, infact I'm sorry for all my previous edits, I just want one Last chance to prove myself that I do not harm to wikipedia. I can promise below points will never happen if I'm unblocked. * I'll never make Paid contributions * I'll not make promotional edits * I'll not write about any company/Person who I have or had been associated with * I'll restrict my edits to India related articles * I'll not vandalize any article/User for any reason, without source/Valid reason given * I'll not write any article even disclosing WP:COI If you have anything I need to accept I'll accept and never breach that contract. I'm trying to get unblocked because I love being on Wikipedia and spending time here reading and fixing articles, Please consider my unblock request worth a shot :( ~Akshay~ (talk) 10:51, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficiently convincing for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 14:07, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please can you explain what articles you will edit and what changes you will make, if unblocked? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 18:44, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom appeal declined

User:Iamzine13 and User:Akshayzine13, which are operated by the same user, have made simultaneous appeals to ArbCom, which have been declined on grounds of block evasion. Under the terms of the Standard offer, the Akshayzine13 account may appeal again after 1st December 2019 provided the user behind the accounts does not edit Wikipedia from any account, registered or not, between now and the appeal. SilkTork (talk) 14:04, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Mumbaiker per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mumbaiker. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 12:03, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]