Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Cher-cher (talk | contribs)
22 edits
No edit summary
Cher-cher (talk | contribs)
22 edits
Line 464: Line 464:
*{{revisions|Draft:Avissinias Square}}
*{{revisions|Draft:Avissinias Square}}
''I, Cher-cher, request the undeletion of this [[WP:AFC|Articles for creation]] submission deleted under [[WP:CSD#G13|CSD G13]]. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' [[User:Cher-cher|Cher-cher]] ([[User talk:Cher-cher|talk]]) 11:05, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
''I, Cher-cher, request the undeletion of this [[WP:AFC|Articles for creation]] submission deleted under [[WP:CSD#G13|CSD G13]]. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' [[User:Cher-cher|Cher-cher]] ([[User talk:Cher-cher|talk]]) 11:05, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

== Draft:Avissinias Square ==

*{{revisions|Page name goes here}}
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —[[User:Cher-cher|Cher-cher]] ([[User talk:Cher-cher|talk]]) 11:08, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:08, 20 April 2017


Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.
Shortcuts
"WP:RFU" redirects here. For requests for unblock, see Category:Requests for unblock. For requests for unprotection, see Wikipedia:Requests for page protection § Current requests for reduction in protection level.

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied, restored as a draft or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page. Please do not request that articles deleted under speedy deletion criteria A7, G5 or G11 be undeleted here.

Note that requests for undeletion are not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

Instructions for special cases


float
float
float
float
Please enter the page's title to request its undeletion:

Deletion discussions
Articles
Templates and modules
Files
Categories
Redirects
Miscellany
Speedy deletion
Proposed deletion

Draft:Green Star Media Ltd

I, Rugbyboy2, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Rugbyboy2 (talk) 12:44, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tokyogirl79. Yes please there may be something that can be used from that earlier draft Rugbyboy2 (talk) 15:13, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks Rugbyboy2 (talk) 15:28, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Rugbyboy2: I have merged the histories of the draft and main space articles so that everything is now in one place. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:46, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Anachronist Thank you Rugbyboy2 (talk) 22:20, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ryan McKibben

I, Rmckibben, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Rmckibben (talk) 20:58, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:14, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Timothy M. Herbst

I, Eaglewbc, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Eaglewbc (talk) 00:19, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:15, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of Stanley Cup Finals broadcasters

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —BornonJune8 (talk) 06:46, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't fair that the National Hockey League's premiere championship event doesn't have its own individual article for its broadcasters while other sports do. That article took a really long time to set up and put together to just let it go by the waste-side. And just because they aren't fully sourced on the proper article itself, doesn't necessarily mean that they aren't non the less, more thoroughly sourced on the respective articles for said television networks. BornonJune8 (talk) , 23:45, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Stanley Cup Western Conference Finals broadcasters, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Ymblanter (talk · contribs), or Ad Orientem (talk · contribs) who deleted it most recently in accordance with WP:G4. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:12, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Balkrishna

Suddenly the page has been deleted. Whenever I used to get time, I used to add things to this page. He is among one of the richest billionaires in India. How can someone directly delete the page without a reason. Please restore it.Didgeri (talk) 12:31, 13 April 2017 (UTC) —Didgeri (talk) 12:31, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Didgeri:  Not done since it was deleted as WP:G11, but waiting for a response from User:JzG. If JzG won't restore it, you may have to take this to Wikipedia:Deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:10, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This is a bit rum:
Didgeri (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Royaal (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Adiaryaa (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Aashishssharma004 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Kingsuknandi (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Shaliniaggrawal (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Anjalipatwal (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
I suspect off-wiki collaboration. Guy (Help!) 22:57, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@JzG: What does "off-wiki collaboration" have to do with a unilateral WP:G11 deletion? I asked you for your rationale at User talk:JzG/Archive 146 and you gave a dismissive reply. The article you deleted had zero resemblance to the version that was deleted by Bbb23 in 2014. Is it such a big deal to slap an AFD nomination tag on it instead? ~Anachronist (talk) 16:20, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Lovely Spam! Wonderful Spam! Guy (Help!) 19:02, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@JzG: Another non-answer? What was being spammed? It was a fully fleshed-out article with many references to reliable sources. Why did you feel it necessary to take unilateral action to delete the entire article without review, versus any number of other things that could have been done, such as removing the spam links, going to AFD, blacklisting some links, and so on? And if the article were restored, what specifically would be your objection? Nobody here can read your mind, so please enlighten us about your reasoning. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:59, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Neal Collins (politician)

This was PROD'd because the individual in question was just a candidate for office. But now they have been elected to the South Carolina House of Representatives, and are therefore inherently notable per WP:NPOL. —LtNOWIS (talk) 02:04, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:James Manning (1917-1989)

I, 2407:7000:8767:5770:BC47:DA97:7F45:2CD6, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2407:7000:8767:5770:BC47:DA97:7F45:2CD6 (talk) 02:15, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thailand national under-14 football team

This page is true information. Information from AFC and FA Thailand website. —BTechTV (talk) 14:44, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@BTechTV: but this version is substantially the same in content (the new one actually has less sources) than the one deleted previously at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thailand national under-14 football team. Also, read the message at the top of this page. This page isn't for contesting pending deletions, or deletion outcomes. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:54, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creating Draft:Helga Moray

Hreynecke (talk) 14:57, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Run in Red

A7. No indication of importance (people, animals, organizations, web content, events) Shortcut: WP:A7 Further information: Wikipedia:Credible claim of significance This applies to any article about a real person, individual animal(s), organization, web content or organized event[8] that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, with the exception of educational institutions.[9] This is distinct from verifiability and reliability of sources, and is a lower standard than notability. This criterion applies only to articles about web content and to articles about people, organizations, and individual animals themselves, not to articles about their books, albums (these may be covered by CSD A9), software, or other creative works. This criterion does not apply to species of animals, only to individual animal(s). The criterion does not apply to any article that makes any credible claim of significance or importance even if the claim is not supported by a reliable source or does not qualify on Wikipedia's notability guidelines. The criterion does apply if the claim of significance or importance given is not credible. If the claim's credibility is unclear, you can improve the article yourself, propose deletion, or list the article at articles for deletion. —KillickK (talk) 16:07, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The person who deleted this page was using the standard of notability which is NOT the policy of wikipedia. Where an article is credible in supporting the significance then the page MUST remain. When an artist is published by BMI, distributed by itunes, Spotify and Deezer... they have then become significant. I demand that you reverse this decision to delete the page of Run in Red.

 Not done. No such claims of significance were made in the article, therefore a A7 deletion was appropriate. Take it up with the deleting administrator, Richie333. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:24, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Whirlpool (song)

Please restore this page (contesting the PROD so that the edit history may be restored), then afterwards, replace the page's entire content with the following text:

#REDIRECT [[Forbidden Places]]
{{R with history}} {{R from song}}

(I'm not contesting the subject's notability, just wanting the edit history restored since this can become a redirect.) Thanks! —Steel1943 (talk) 19:04, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Johnny Symons

I, Dchein, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Dchein (talk) 22:03, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:James Manning (1917-1989)

I, Joslad1, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Joslad1 (talk) 01:49, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

zana tetrazini

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Shawndadoe (talk) 03:13, 15 April 2017 (UTC) the idea is made by myself and myself only. there is nothing else like it in the web.[reply]

Spit_like_this

Deleted claiming the band to be local, despite having several internationally distributed releases through recognised channels, signed to Sony/ATV, performed internationally and so on. Any quick Google can verify all these facts https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=%22spit+like+this%22&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b-ab&gfe_rd=cr&ei=myLyWLSzA8bHXp-ggSA —84.51.134.119 (talk) 13:42, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Double the Vivek Singh Chaudhary

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Double the Vivek Singh Chaudhary 13:46, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Quectel Wireless Solutions

I, Ashleyliu, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ashleyliu (talk) 16:44, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • This was deleted under WP:G11, so I just want to check with Sjb72 to see if they would be willing to restore it. It doesn't look that bad as far as the potential promotion goes, at least not for something at AfC, so my thought is that it would be something that would be appropriate to restore as long as you're willing to work on this. On a side note, you must disclose any potential WP:COI you may have with the article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 19:15, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Also, don't forget to address the promotional issues. Stephen! Coming... 06:47, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oswaldo Oropeza, el compositor de Latinoamerica

I, Caribana10, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Caribana10 (talk) 02:24, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to request the undeletion of the page I am writing to my father. I started my own company 2 1/2 years ago and it is only now that it is starting to work and I have time now to finish my father's page, which I will complete with pictures and then publish for approval. Please help me in retrieving my father's Wikipeida page agEnter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Caribana10 (talk) 02:27, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This page has been deleted multiple times as an abandoned draft article. As Articles for creation, the Draft space, and user subpages are not to be used to indefinitely host material inappropriate for the encyclopedia, what exactly would you do to help make the draft get accepted as an article? This page has been deleted as an abandoned draft three or four times. Most drafts only get undeleted once, maybe twice. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 22:15, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Marcus Gosse

I, Lismatthews, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Lismatthews (talk) 02:36, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

sujok therapy

the containing information is very valuable and useful for the society at large. Sujok therapy is such a natural method of treatment accepted global and I believe that this article can stand here and improve —Smile Dhaval (talk) 06:24, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 22:00, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Charles McIlveen

This article refers to an elected Member of the Legislative Assembly of Ontario and, under Wikipedia's "notability" criteria, no further references are required.

Please re-instate the article, thank you.

QP1995

Draft:Stanislav Protassov

have sourced additional materials to support the article. thank you. —14.203.149.9 (talk) 16:55, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lucas Bambozzi

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Diphusa (talk) 18:30, 16 April 2017 (UTC) A translated page about Lucas Bambozzi was speedy deleted without the opportunity for reviewing the mistakes or attributions requested. As explained to the contributor, Diannaa the article is about an artist/person who is notable in his working field, so the words for describing his actuation are surely in close relation to his biographic details, both in English and Portuguese. A proper attribution, quotation of sources and history of links will be fully provided in the reviewed article. Many thanks, --Diphusa (talk) 18:30, 16 April 2017 (UTC) Diphusa (talk) 18:30, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Diphusa, the page for Lucas Bambozzi is not in English. All pages on the English language Wikipedia must be in English or it will run the risk of getting deleted. Prior to that you had also added content from this website, making it a copyright violation. This is why Diannaa deleted some of the prior verisons of the page. If you want the page retained, you need to translate it into English. However even then you need to be careful to make sure that he passes WP:NBIO guidelines on Wikipedia - just because his page exists on another language's Wikipedia does not mean that he passes notability guidelines on here. An individual is not automatically notable for existing and putting out work in their field. You have to show notability by providing independent reliable sources that establish how Bambozzi is notable. Primary sources (ie, things released by Bambozzi or people/organizations affiliated with him) cannot show notability. I'm also concerned that the name of the article is Lucas Bambozzi, yet the article itself talks about someone named Lucas de Silveira. If he operates under a professional name, then this needs to be noted and sourced in the article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:35, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:J. C. H. King

I, NeilMitchell, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. NeilMitchell (talk) 21:39, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

宗 also known as .

thank you @wikipedia 🌿 editor — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hyroyal (talk • contribs) 01:35, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 03:56, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Karthik ganiga/sandbox

This is the wikipage going to be created for the Alva's Institution of Engineering and Technology and i am fully authorized by the organisation to create the wikipedia page and use content from the organisation website.Please allow me to continue to create wiki page on the same.Thank You —Karthik ganiga (talk) 04:06, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That isn't how it works at all. See WP:Donating copyrighted materials for information on donating copyrighted text. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 04:14, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Espoona

I see no reason why a fun, made up team can be deleted. I put my heart and soul into it! —93.191.207.78 (talk) 09:06, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done Wikipedia is not a place to post content that you came up with one day. I'm giving the account that made the page a NOTHERE block until they can show that they are willing to edit within policy, given that they kept recreating the page even after a pretty clear warning that it wasn't acceptable. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:25, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


User:Terri Kenyon/Oleg Chorny

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Terri Kenyon (talk) 12:16, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Terri Kenyon: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:58, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:The Pearl Harts

I, 80.175.71.191, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 80.175.71.191 (talk) 13:01, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Please do work on it, this is the second time the draft has been restored now. Regards SoWhy 14:21, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

fourth battle of berekly

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —2601:186:280:F19:4C95:10E5:89EF:F4B1 (talk) 20:51, 17 April 2017 (UTC) this is censorship[reply]

 Not done. No, it isn't censorship, it's proper main space maintenance. The article was a test page, containing just one incomplete sentence "Based stickMan as he fights off the evil anti-fa." Start over. Preferably in draft space. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:57, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Amanda Manopo

I request restoration of this page. —Andranik Mkhitaryan (talk) 00:48, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done, see the message immediately below. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:53, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Requester is now blocked as a sockpuppet of the article creator. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:08, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Natasha Wilona

Good well-written article only deleted because it was created by a banned user —Andranik Mkhitaryan (talk) 01:02, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. @Andranik Mkhitaryan: Ask the deleting administrator Sphilbrick if s/he would be willing to restore it to draft space. In main space, the article wouldn't survive WP:AFD, since the only two sources that were cited are rather trivial paragraphs, and there is zero evidence that she meets WP:NACTOR criteria for inclusion. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:51, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
There are some editors who feel that an otherwise acceptable article should not be deleted simply because it was created by a banned user. While I understand the sentiment behind that position, I think it subverts the very point of banning user so I personally don't support it. If some independent editor wants to create an article about this person, that would be wonderful.--S Philbrick(Talk) 12:46, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Sphilbrick: I'm one of those editors who believes that a good article should be kept no matter who wrote it; however, I don't agree that the articles requested by Andranik Mkhitaryan on this page are good articles (which is why I suggest restoring to draft space, if at all), and I'm especially bothered by the fact that this requester shows signs of being another sockpuppet of the article's author. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:07, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Anachronist: I won't carry out the move, but neither will I overturn it if someone else does.--S Philbrick(Talk) 17:26, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Sphilbrick: The requester has been confirmed as a sockpuppet of the creator. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:07, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:PokeCanada/draft Christian McLeish

Reviving page to update it with current information; would like to reuse old information. —PokeCanada (talk) 02:06, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@PokeCanada: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:01, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dian Pramana Poetra

I request restoration of this page. —Andranik Mkhitaryan (talk) 05:29, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. @Andranik Mkhitaryan: If you read any of the responses above, you should know by now that the answer is to contact the deleting administrator, in this case Primefac and ask that the article be restored to draft space for improvement. If it were restored to main space, it would not survive WP:AFD due to the subject failing to meet any WP:MUSICBIO inclusion criteria. ~Anachronist (talk) 07:18, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Requester has been blocked as a sockpuppet. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:09, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kobi Arad

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Hkronk (talk) 07:17, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have been in the process of working on Kobi Arad's page. With a little work, it should confirm to Wiki standards. I would love to work with what already existed instead of creating a new page altogether. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hkronk (talk • contribs) 07:19, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The only editors who have been working on this article recently are sockpuppets. ~Anachronist (talk) 07:22, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Manorama Bai

This was a completely valid page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samaka6 (talk • contribs) 09:16, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Example

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 213.205.252.153 (talk) 09:27, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Francisco Mejia (general)

Following the recent move from Gen. Francisco Mejia, undelete the previous deleted revisions for completeness. —24.205.24.240 (talk) 16:41, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:02, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:James Lewicki

Lisalewickihermanson1 (talk) 17:52, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
@Lisalewickihermanson1: I also noticed you re-created that draft. I restored the previous contribution history and reverted it back to the most recent version in that history. If you want the version you just created, please look in the "View history" tab on that page.~Anachronist (talk) 20:14, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

{{subst:Refund/Draft: Arden Altino }}

Draft:Arden Altino

I, 2601:86:103:7F90:154E:B35:36D6:181F, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2601:86:103:7F90:154E:B35:36D6:181F (talk) 01:59, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done – Juliancolton | Talk 02:07, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Karthik ganiga/sandbox

Iam creating the contents by my own. Sources that has been used on the article was fully original and unique. But still its deleted under copyright issues. I request you to please restore my article and allow me to publish in wikipedia. —Karthik ganiga (talk) 02:31, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pages deleted due to copyright concerns are not restored here, fullstop. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 04:05, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Karthik ganiga: your sandbox wasn't deleted due to copyright, it was deleted in accordance with WP:U5 (misuse of Wikipedia as a web host) and WP:G11 (unambiguous promotional content). As such, it is ineligible for restoration by request on this page, but you can ask one of the three administrators who deleted it if they'd consider restoration as a draft. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:00, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Quantum Keyhole

I, Polygog, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Polygog (talk) 04:55, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sudhir Kumar Mishra

Sudhir Kumar Mishra is Distinguished Scientist & Chief Controller (R&D), DRDO, and current CEO & MD, BrahMos Aerospace. BRAHMOS is the only supersonic cruise missile in service, I am sure its CEO & MD - Sudhir Kumar Mishra, deserve a wiki page. I have already edited the content of the page as per wiki norms and would like to work on the page if the moderator is not satisfied with it. and then click the "Save page" button below —Sudhirmishraji (talk) 06:37, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See the top of this page. This page isn't the place to contest pending deletions. ~Anachronist (talk) 06:50, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Timothy (Tim) Hughes

I, Jdsharris, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jdsharris (talk) 10:48, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pavel Bělíček (philologist)

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Pavel Bělíček (talk) 11:38, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My Wikipedia entry Pavel Bělíček does not focus on my personal autography but on my valuable contributions to cultural studies and humanities. I reduced the initial introductions to the minimum but request tolerance for my scientific discoveries.

I am an adherent of Neo-Evolutionism in an age that is infatuated with anti-evolutionalist fundamentalism and claim the authorship of a number of exquisite research projects that have not been formulated on a worldwide scale. They mostly consist in transplanting the systematics of exact natural sciences to chaotic and confused disciplines of cultural studies. My books do not propose only unverifiable hypotheses but present convincing results of years of empirical research. I wrote more than twenty English books that are not mere compilative compendia but encyclopaedias of systematic science in as many as 6 branches of scientific studies.

My Wiki entry makes important references to my books advancing the following noteworthy projects, inventions or discoveries:

the translation of English as a natural language into algebraic and logical calculi, the evolutionary account of the folktale motif-index based on the ethnology of prehistoric tribes, the discovery of evolutionary laws and stages scaling human history, the periodisation of English, American, Czech, French, Italian literature in waves, trends and statistic graphs, a new outline of glottogenesis and reclassification of languages, a new classification of ethnic tribes.

My evolutionism continues in the wake of people such as Aristotle, Theophrastus, Plutarch, Isidor of Seville, Occam, Comenius, G. Vico, Montesquieu, Darwin, Herbert Spencer, Mendeleev or Hubble and my works bring almost equally important and interesting results.

I can’t believe that you would really delete my contribution because this would mean that you are ready to delete also other aforementioned evolutionists and delete also the noble mission of Wikipedia as such.

Thank you for understanding and tolerance.

Pavel Bělíček


Pavel Bělíček (talk) 11:38, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. Take it up at the AfD debate, not here. This page is not for end-runs around deletion discussions, nor will admins here restore pages deleted that way. I would also strongly suggest familiarising yourself with Wikipedia policies, specifically WP:Identifying reliable sources, WP:Conflict of interest, WP:Notability (academic), and WP:Neutral point of view. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 14:45, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Dror Fixler

I, DunMizee, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. DunMizee (talk) 14:11, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:38, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Li Guoqing

I, Breezywoody, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Breezywoody (talk) 16:38, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:41, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:National Translation Month

NTMTeam (talk) 21:35, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@NTMTeam: no Declined. Your username implies that it is a compromised account accessible by multiple people. Go to WP:CHU/Simple immediately before you do anything else to request a change of username that represents only one person as an individual. Organizations are prohibited from having Wikipedia accounts. Come back here after that's done and re-request. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:23, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Munthe's Hat Problem

Kentmc (talk) 22:30, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rana Roy

Completely valid page and would like to update it — Preceding unsigned comment added by A2b3sing (talk • contribs) 22:46, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kadie Lynn Roberson

This article was previously discussed for deletion at AfD with a result of no consensus. Also, the article had edits by users other than the creator, so G5 is inappropriate. —GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 23:12, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Premeditated Chaos: this looks like a borderline G5 to me, could have gone either way. It looks like the banned user contributed about half the content, although the other half seems to consist mostly of maintenance edits like filling in references. Do you object to restoring it? ~Anachronist (talk) 05:33, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I've restored it. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:57, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sudhir Kumar Mishra

Hello Cabayi, I am really surprised that my page got deleted under speedy deletion. I really dont understand why it was done. I have followed all the possible norms of the wiki while creating a wiki page of Sudhir Kumar Mishra, the CEO & MD of BRAHMOS who has a very known personality in India's Missile Scientists. I would like to create a new page with the same name, but before that, I want to know if the same action will be taken for that also? Please let me know the main reason for the deletion of the page and so that I can do the needful and create the page. —Sudhirmishraji (talk) 04:53, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Sudhir Kumar Mishra, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Dlohcierekim (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.
@Sudhirmishraji: It would be best if you continued in draft space rather than performing disruptive recreations in main space, especially if the article is about you (as it seems to be based on your username). Please read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and ask the deleting admin if he'd be willing to restore Draft:Sudhir Kumar Mishra so you can continue working on it. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:30, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sudhirmishraji (talk) 06:22, 20 April 2017 (UTC) Thanks you so much Anachronist ~Anachronist, I was really not getting the point about the frequent deletion of this page. Now, I think I got the point. I will put a request to Dlohcierekim who has deleted my page and closed the discussion, to re open the page and I will make changes over there. And I am not the same person for whom I am making the page. I am just an employee of BRAHMOS Aerospace, and very new to wikipedia. While creating the wiki account to draft this page, I thought the username should be same as the page title. so I used the username- Sudhirmishraji, even my mail address can justify that thing. Anyway, better I should change the user name. Is there any way to change the username? Once again thanks for your suggestions. Or better I create a new account with my real username? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sudhirmishraji (talk • contribs) 06:25, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ferrán Sarsanedas

I, Onyedikachi25, request the undeletion of this Articles of creation submission deleted under CSD G6. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. —Onyedikachi25 08:24, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Battle for the Galaxy

I, Sam Tyurenkov, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sam Tyurenkov (talk) 09:32, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Battle for the Galaxy

Our project is growing and we are collecting sources, to have enough weight to be highlighted in wikipedia, please restore the page, as I'm going to add some of those references —Sam Tyurenkov (talk) 09:35, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:A. V. Boldachev

I, Kumash, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kumash (talk) 09:43, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:A. V. Boldachev

G13: Abandoned AfC submission Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Kumash (talk) 09:46, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Avissinias Square

I, Cher-cher, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Cher-cher (talk) 11:05, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Avissinias Square

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Cher-cher (talk) 11:08, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=776335301"