Jump to content

Talk:Narcissa Wright: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Narcissa Wright/Archive 1) (bot
→‎Notability?: new section
Line 60: Line 60:
A picture should be provided and updated regularly. [[User:Maracont|Maracont]] ([[User talk:Maracont|talk]]) 13:16, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
A picture should be provided and updated regularly. [[User:Maracont|Maracont]] ([[User talk:Maracont|talk]]) 13:16, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
:{{ping|Maracont}} Do you know of a picture that is freely available, ie a photo released under a free license by the photographer? If so, great, link it here and we'll take a look at it.-[[User:IDV|IDV]]<sup>[[User talk:IDV|talk]]</sup> 14:24, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
:{{ping|Maracont}} Do you know of a picture that is freely available, ie a photo released under a free license by the photographer? If so, great, link it here and we'll take a look at it.-[[User:IDV|IDV]]<sup>[[User talk:IDV|talk]]</sup> 14:24, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

== Notability? ==

Why does this person have a wikipedia page? If being known solely among a tiny group of people interested in highly niche hobbies is grounds for notability, then just about every local band ever formed deserves their own wikipedia page, and I don't believe anyone's about to argue in favor of that. This page should be deleted posthaste.

Revision as of 01:30, 27 April 2017

Harassment being point-of-view?

@Thehack771: Is Wright getting harassed WP:POV? The Crave article seems to accept it as fact, and I don't see much reason not to believe it (especially after all the reverting I've had to do on this article...). Is there a reason to believe Wright has not been harassed? I don't really like the way in which the sentence is phrased now, as it feels as though the source suggests this may not actually be true. ~Mable (chat) 20:33, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kotaku also seems to suggest that there may have been something going on, asking questions like "In light of negativity you’ve received pre- and post-transition, have you ever had moments where you considered leaving the public eye? Even regardless of people being garbage-spewing toilet monsters, does it all just get exhausting, essentially being on stage all the time?". ~Mable (chat) 20:36, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Maplestrip: Well it doesn't really matter either way now, she has restored her twitch account so its no longer worth mentioning.Thehack771 (talk) 04:52, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It is worth mentioning that she had deleted her Twitch account and reported a large amount of harassment, as it has been noted by a reliable source. Deleting one's Twitch account when you're a professional streamer sounds pretty notable to me, even if she undid the action later-on. We note this kind of stuff for people like Laci Green as well, don't we? ~Mable (chat) 06:00, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Okay you can add it back in to the page if you want, i won't change it. I still don't like writing the harrasment as a fact, i like the way this article phrases it: http://www.polygon.com/2016/4/8/11394378/famed-speedrunner-narcissa-wright-deletes-twitch-account-citing-abuse as "citing abuse" unlike the other articles which don't write it from her pov. Either way, Whichever you decide i won't change.Thehack771 (talk) 17:38, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Also Narcissa suggests on twitter that she herself didn't restore the twitch account but it randomly came back. I'm not sure if that tweet is meant as a joke, but its worth noting in the deleted twitch section that she didn't restore it on her own.Thehack771 (talk) 17:48, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I think both can agree that the article doesn't give misinformation now, and is nicely neutral :) ~Mable (chat) 18:18, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Perfect thanks! Thehack771 (talk) 19:17, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

..Unrelated note

Also on an unrelated note, there is a lot of info in the polygon and Kotaku article that we can use to update the career and personal life sections, these sections don't mention anything about her stream post-transition which is very different . Also if anyone here is a subscriber to Narcissa on twitch, please ask for her to pose for a picture or let us have permission to grab a screen capture of her stream to use as an infobox pic. She has allowed it in the past (before her transition) so I'm sure she would allow it especially because it would replace the artwork of her on the google instant search with a picture she would like more. Thehack771 (talk) 19:17, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 4 November 2016


correcting vandalism and unnecessary revisions made by a previous editor.

Emberlaine (talk) 15:46, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. Unsure what you mean. GABgab 15:50, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 24 April 2017

A picture should be provided and updated regularly. Maracont (talk) 13:16, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Maracont: Do you know of a picture that is freely available, ie a photo released under a free license by the photographer? If so, great, link it here and we'll take a look at it.-IDVtalk 14:24, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notability?

Why does this person have a wikipedia page? If being known solely among a tiny group of people interested in highly niche hobbies is grounds for notability, then just about every local band ever formed deserves their own wikipedia page, and I don't believe anyone's about to argue in favor of that. This page should be deleted posthaste.