Jump to content

User talk:I dream of horses: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 801333518 by I dream of horses (talk)
No edit summary
Line 24: Line 24:


{{email user}}
{{email user}}
{{bots}}
{{Cats}}


== greenbush ==
== greenbush ==

Revision as of 01:56, 19 September 2017

Calm


This user has opted out of talkbacks

greenbush

Kudos on a great :edit -) if you have any questions write to me Infiniti0571 (talk) 03:19, 16 September 2017 (UTC) You don't like cats? Thank you for the welcome so if you don't mind me asking how do you know about the mbta greenbush aren't you in California? Infiniti0571 (talk) 03:36, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Infinti0571: You're welcome.
If you're talking about Greenbush (MBTA station), I haven't edited that article. You probably meant to talk to someone else. If you're talking about something else, you're going to have to link to the article.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 03:40, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:H. L. Hunley (submarine). Legobot (talk) 04:24, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

@I dream of horses: Hello, I am a new editor to Wikipedia. I am very much confused about my rejection. Maybe as I am new, i cannot understand various things. I have been getting the following message:

"This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time."

I have given various links, references, citation,but still my article is being rejected. Please help me regarding this. My article link is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Md._Mohibbur_Rahman_(Babu)

Thank you Shawn.hossan (talk) 07:59, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Shawn.hossan: While you've added references, there's still entire sections without references. There's also a problem with tone. Rahman is described as "self-motivated", "with extensive experience", in a "renowned" position, and "well-known". If he is all of these things, show us, don't tell us.
Kees08, Otterathome, and Aguyintobooks may have something to add to the discussion, since they've also reviewed the draft.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 08:47, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

6 I suggest you read WP:BIO, there needs to be more proof the subject is notable. ^ also there is a tone issue. Α Guy into Books § (Message) -  08:54, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]