Jump to content

User talk:Theroadislong: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Line 636: Line 636:
:Well that contradicts what you said here [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Changing_username/Simple&diff=prev&oldid=850080059]? " I want to change my username from my real name for the fear of harassment etc" [[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] ([[User talk:Theroadislong#top|talk]]) 13:40, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
:Well that contradicts what you said here [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Changing_username/Simple&diff=prev&oldid=850080059]? " I want to change my username from my real name for the fear of harassment etc" [[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] ([[User talk:Theroadislong#top|talk]]) 13:40, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
It is not my real name, it is a real name which I failed to express. Shall I correct my mistake there too? [[[User:Good Cop Sam|Good Cop Sam]] ([[User talk:Good Cop Sam|talk]]) 13:42, 13 July 2018 (UTC)]
It is not my real name, it is a real name which I failed to express. Shall I correct my mistake there too? [[[User:Good Cop Sam|Good Cop Sam]] ([[User talk:Good Cop Sam|talk]]) 13:42, 13 July 2018 (UTC)]

== Hello from slotmachiner and question on article resubmit ==

Good afternoon @Theroadislong ,

Thank you for looking at my article submission for Kaihan Krippendorff. I went through and reworked, basing all of the information off of articles I found from jstor, google scholar, or grade A media news sources. Can you let me know what you think of the changed article?

I also read through your article and noticed that you seem to be interested in Staffordshire pottery – I am into collecting antiques as well and two summers ago found an excellent piece created by Enoch Wood in 1820. Underappreciated art in my opinion. Thought you might find that interesting!

Best regards,

Slotmachiner--[[User:Slotmachiner|Slotmachiner]] ([[User talk:Slotmachiner|talk]]) 19:42, 13 July 2018 (UTC)Slotmachiner

Revision as of 19:42, 13 July 2018

Italic text

Welcome to my talk page. Click here to leave me a message .

I have resubmitted

I have resubmitted the article for a re-review, please let me know if it reads better now? If not, can you give me an example of how to improve it. thank you


Q on reference source language

07:53:55, 14 November 2017 review of submission by FriendlyB


Dear Thereodislong,

thank you for reviewing the draft "Dr. Petry Textile Auxiliaries".

For the sources, I cited independent sources, such as - http://www.genios.de/fachzeitschriften/artikel/MTB/20080617/umweltschutz-und-nachhaltigkeit-in-/060817061.html - https://www.biooekonomie-bw.de/de/fachbeitrag/aktuell/insektenchitin-macht-textilherstellung-nachhaltiger/

In order to have more evidence, I added information from further independent sources and references: - https://www.bloomberg.com/profiles/companies/6311207Z:GR-textilchemie-dr-petry-gmbh - https://www.bluesign.com/industry/chemical-suppliers/references/textilchemie-dr-petry

Thank you in advance for re-reviewing.

Thanks for your help!

Thanks for your assistance with Draft:InnoCare. I have included

and noted it on your user page that I work for that company. They're not paying me to create this page, I just think it would cool to have a Wikipedia page. Let me know if there's anything else you can suggest to improve my draft. I appreciate your help!

05:44:48, 23 November 2017 review of submission by Lizzybunker

I've added the appropriate citations!

Invacio

Hi Theroadislong I've edited the text - please let me know if it's better this way I appreciate your feedback!

00:53:26, 27 November 2017 review of submission by Cmolaro


I added more 3rd party sources that are verifiable and are independent, professional sources (not personal blogs or sites). I now have 15 citations.

Please let me know what else you think is required to have it accepted?

12:54:53, 27 November 2017 review of submission by Llewol


08:40:08, 28 November 2017 review of submission by Salt&pepper12345


Hi there, thank very much for your care and consideration to to help build this page. I can understand why the review was rejected, as i hadn't cited enough sources on the first draft. I was wondering if you'd mind having a read over the latest draft and checking if it is better now thank you. SP

13:22:45, 4 December 2017 review of submission by 79.106.95.85


21:10:13, 6 December 2017 review of submission by Innocent Cuty


Dear Theroadislong

Hope you are fine and doing good.

I am requesting for a review again as the major comment for rejection/decline of this article was its Reference section or having less references. Now, the draft has been updated, and more than 20 solid references have been employed, with more historical details, and best possible bibliographic support in the light of the available literature. This single page article is now having over 25 appropriate references, and are strengthened with new data.

Your anticipation in this regard will be highly appreciated.

Sincere Regards

The objected references (facebook) has been udpated with the departmental URLS (links to the webpages). Thank you for the Prompt response and providing support to make this draft better.

Dear Theroadislong

Thank you very much for your prompt response.

The objected references (facebook) has been udpated with the departmental URLS (links to the webpages). I think, these were the most up to dated and regularly updating references. Moreover, the last paragraph was deleted, because the book describing the paragraph and the mentioned material is in press (which is written by Dr. Ikram), and once the book got published, the three to four lines paragraph will be inserted again.

I do hope, that the draft will get approved now and will get online, as after coming across other such articles, this one seems to be far better than those.

Your prompt and positive anticipation in this regard will be highly appreciated.

Thanking you in anticipation

Sincere Regards

07:43:09, 15 December 2017 review of submission by Kgkg90


23:49:06, 23 December 2017 review of submission by Pearl ally


The submission's referencing was improved as advised, and I added a few more. More information on his teachings and publications were added. The page exists in 3 other Wikipedia: https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Russell https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Russell https://sk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Russell

In-depth coverage

I added RPG Site. Is that a reliable source?

02:14:50, 26 December 2017 review of submission by Pearl ally


Please see references 15,18,19,21,22

07:39:46, 28 December 2017 review of submission by Nat.johnson


Hi Theroadislong! I have recently uploaded a draft of the article "Admitad" here and you have declined it. Could you kindly explain what can I do to make it right? Is it possible to work with you as my mentor on the draft? Or, maybe, you can help with writing, could you kindly tell me what is the best option? admitad is a global company, it already helps over 630,000 people worldwide. I believe, that it needs to be on Wikipedia.

23:24:44, 4 January 2018 review of submission by Yesterdaysfire


Hi there!

I was just wondering what the issue was with my article submission? I tried to follow all the guidelines. I hope that I can make any revisions that you may require!

edited

Hi there Thanks for your comment. Made the edits per your notes on the page for David A. Hurwitz. GigiH0118

13:36:39, 8 January 2018 review of submission by Tearstosweat


More reliable references like newspaper sources(Times of India, Decaan Chronicle) are added

00:42:00, 26 February 2018 review of re-submission by Vliander


Dear Theroadislong,


Thank you for your valuable time and timely reply.


The bellow listed recognition letters and independent press publications may provide a more in-depth coverage regarding different subjects about Carl-W. Röhrig's life and work mentioned in the WIKI article.


I now additionally added the following references to the Citations and References section in the article:


8. Röhrig, Carl-W. (1992). "Newspaper Article". DIE WELT - Independent Daily Newspaper for Germany.

9. Röhrig, Carl-W. (1993). "Newspaper Article". East Grinstead Courier, United Kingdom.

10. Röhrig, Carl-W. (1989). "Recognition Letter". by the National Geographic Society, Washington D.C.

11. Röhrig, Carl-W. (1993). "Newspaper Article". THE PRESS, Christchurch, New Zealand.

12. Röhrig, Carl-W. (1992). "Recognition Letter". by Heinz Sielemann, Munich, Germany.

14. Röhrig, Carl-W. (1993). "Newspaper Article". BILD Newspaper, Germany.

17. Röhrig, Carl-W. (2003). "Newspaper Article". Fränkischer Tag, Newspaper, Germany.


I am looking forward hearing from you.


Sincerely,

Vliander


Vliander (talk) 00:42:00, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

12:27:00, 26 February 2018 review of re-submission by Vliander

Dear Theroadislong,


The article was written from a neutral point of view and reliable sources where provided.

The questioned links in regards to Röhrig letters could be removed if required.


Sincerely,

Vliander

Who are u

Who are u to correct me or remove the changes I made to kammara sambhavam.

Request on 08:52:05, 6 June 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by WildBullMiller


Thanks for the info

For the bio, is Nicholas Kaufmann's official website a good enough source? That's where the info comes from, anyway.

The Sumaira Foundation for NMO

Hello,

I recently submitted the page "The Sumaira Foundation for NMO" and you denied it on the principle that it was not neutral, and the sources were produced by The Sumaira Foundation.

I am confused as to what sources were produced by the foundation, since none of the citations or hyperlinks were in any way affiliated in a non-neutral standpoint with the foundation. The articles linked simply talked about the foundation, but were not created by it.

I would really appreciate some feedback since this was a neutral page creation. Template:Aliaalchalbi (talk · contribs) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aliaalchalabi (talk • contribs) 17:43, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Aliaalchalabi I declined the draft because it reads more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia, do you have a conflict of interest by ay chance? Theroadislong (talk) 19:01, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Theroadislong My COI issue has been taken care of via my userpage. Thank you for your help in this situation. Aliaalchalabi (talk)

Request on 21:31:11, 23 June 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by LadyCharlotteC


Hi, you have declined my page on the fact that the sources are not clear? Im not entirely sure how they are not as the names of the sources are self explanatory. Please can you expand on what you mean.

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5]

These are all peerage pages and documentation on peerages including Parliaments own site.

Thank you,

Charlotte

LadyCharlotteC (talk) 21:31, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia requires better sourcing details than this, we need the title, publisher, page number and date. Theroadislong (talk) 21:36, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Burkes Peerage
  2. ^ Birth records
  3. ^ Cracroft
  4. ^ thepeeragepage.com
  5. ^ History of Parliament

Lifi Publications notability tag

Hey

I noticed you put a tag for checking the general notability guideline. I have added more citations, authors and award to strengthen it.

Harsh7agl (talk) 05:02, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Savannah Welch

Hello Theroadislong,

You said : "Her father maybe notable but no evidence that savannah is yet?"

In fact she is notable, she is part of the musician group The Trishas and she is an actress in several movies and a current serie. She also has a facebook page, Instragam and twitter account and an Imdb page. There is also articles from notable newspapers that I linked with the draft.

Thanks to reconsider the draft.

Good day,

Mimine-xyz (talk) 14:58, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Having a Facebook page, Instagram Twitter account and an Imdb page has no bearing whatsoever on her notability the whole world has these? You need to establish notability by adding references that show there is widespread coverage of her in reliable sources. Theroadislong (talk) 15:00, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Compassionate727. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Dick Harris (center), and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

—Compassionate727 (T·C) 17:27, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Guidance needed to Publish my article

Dear Theroadislong, Thank you for your valuable feedback while reviewing the page "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:RentSher". I need your guidance to get this page published in wikipedia. Please help me with this.

Murali2013 (talk) 08:00, 26 June 2018 (UTC)murali2013[reply]

It cannot be accepted unless it reads like a neutral encyclopaedia article terms like "RentSher has some unique products for catering to all of the Life Events" "Though there are larger furniture and appliance rental companies like Furlenco and Rentomojo, no company focused on Short-Term requirements, from a few hours to few weeks." are just blatant advertising do you have a connection with the company by any chance? If so please read WP:COI. Theroadislong (talk) 08:29, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

you have recently reviewed my article and declined it. please tell me in detail what i have to edit in my article. Actually i want to create a page or article for my website roxstarindia. Please guide me in detail what i have to add and what i have to edit. And also tell me what reference i have to add in it, but i don't have any reference so please tell me the list of reference which i can add in the article. My Article is Draft:roxstarindia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nikhiljain founder (talk • contribs) 08:54, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

We only summarise what reliable, independent published sources have to say about a subject. If there are no such sources then we cannot have an article. Theroadislong (talk)
  • (talk page stalker) Nikhiljain founder has spammed this identical message to the Teahouse, the Help desk, and here at Theroadislong's talkpage, all within a few minutes. Please don't do that, Nikhiljain. It's known as forum shopping or "asking the other parent", and it only annoys people. Please see all the replies you have received at the Help desk, and take them to heart. Wikipedia is not for promotion. Bishonen | talk 11:19, 26 June 2018 (UTC).[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Marcus Campbell (artist)

Hello Theroadislong. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Marcus Campbell (artist), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: if multiple people think someone important enough to write a book about, there are significant enough to pass A7. Thank you. SoWhy 13:43, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I'm not seeing any books written about him? There are two catalogues of his work. Theroadislong (talk) 13:47, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bishop Srampickal

Why declined my page? That was about a bishop of Roman catholic church..

IS he not a notable person? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jainjoo (talk • contribs) 16:56, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have now accepted the article after the addition of further references, it was complicated by the fact you had reverted my edits. Theroadislong (talk) 17:10, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Margot Horspool draft article

Thank you for your kind comment about my draft article on Prof. M. Horspool. You are right about the lack of sources. The problem is that I have only the personal information given about her on her big book, and online by OUP. The other surce of information about her is the obituary of her husband in The Telegraph. The rest is just what I have heard as a postgrad student in London - like her being Dutch etc - not a very good source I am afraid. Maybe I should delete them? Thanks again. Grotius2018 (talk) 17:56, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PRNCESRACHEL page

What is going on with PrncesRachel page why is still under drafts? Here are other legitimate sources

http://www.artistreachofficial.com/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:201:300:6AE1:8952:4CC1:9B27:C925 (talk) 18:46, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing is "going on" the draft has no reliable sources at all and won't be accepted until it does. Amazon is also not a reliable source. Theroadislong (talk) 18:51, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 20:29:47, 26 June 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Desimo~enwiki


Thanks for reviewing my submission. I think you should reconsider as many would find this business notable.

https://www.gq.com/gallery/best-hat-stores

http://theheadwearassociation.org/levines-hat-company-voted-2018-retailer-of-the-year/

http://fox2now.com/2017/01/05/where-hitch-got-his-hat/

http://news.stlpublicradio.org/term/levine-hat-company#stream/0

Just a few first page results from a search

EVERYONE in the midwest knows about Levine Hat Co. - And many who wear hats in the whole country knows about them as well. They are as well known as Ted Drewes https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Drewes and are well over 100 years old.

Thanks for your consideration

Desimo~enwiki (talk) 20:29, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It would help if you added those sources as references instead of their own website. Theroadislong (talk) 20:33, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fokoya Feedback

Hello! I am a new contributor to wikipedia and I appreciate your feedback on my Fokoya submission. I went back into the sandbox and added a couple of new sources and added a little bit more substance. Hope it gets published! Thanks!

Cheers!

Ckretch — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ckretch (talk • contribs) 10:19, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

refs Norbert Küpper

Hello and thanks for your support. Sorry, I am not really expierenced in writing articles for wikipedia. Regarding above topic you say the sources are raised by Küpper. I understand what you say! Beside that these sources tell the official work he is doing. For example an article which is published in The Guardian might be valid to prove the background of Küpper. Also an european congress which is visited by the top heads of newspapers in europe with a history of 20 years should be an indicator that this person is real and of public interest. Nethertheless I see your point. But it is hard to get other sources as Küpper is working with newspapers and of course is himself writing about newspapers and his work more than the newspapers about him. I wrote the same article in german wikipedia where these sources are accepted. Maybe you can help the get result even in english wiki. Thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mziegle (talk • contribs) 11:51, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

We only summarise what reliable, independent published sources have to say about a subject. If there are no such sources then we cannot have an article. Theroadislong (talk) 12:04, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 13:46:58, 28 June 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Tero111



Tero111 (talk) 13:46, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

RESPONSE from Tero111

There is an article on birds of Nebraska in Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_birds_of_Nebraska

The external link goes to the NOU website, the organization my article was about. The state has a population of less than 2 million, but from an ornithological point of view is an interesting location between the East and West. The two links I provided improve the Wuikipedia reader's access to reliable information about the state. The effort is run by volunteers, so that the presence of birders and volunteers is never going to be the same level as "birds of Costa Rica" where endeless books and articles exist. However, the small effort here in Nebraska (I live here) is in no way insignificant. Yes, the average user is going to find my information with Google, but does Wikipedia want to push all the curious to go the Google route? Tero111 (talk) 13:46, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In order to demonstrate notability, you need to provide multiple references to in-depth articles written about the Nebraska Ornithologists' Union in unrelated, independent journals, magazines, books or online. If there are no other sources then we can’t have an article. Theroadislong (talk) 13:51, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018 at Women in Red

Hello again from Women in Red!


July 2018 worldwide online editathons:
New: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/83|Sub-Saharan Africa]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/84|Film + stage]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/85|20th-century]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/86|Women Rock]]
Continuing: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/00|Notable women, broadly-construed!]]


Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!):

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 14:04, 28 June 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

about new article

how can i submit article. my page might not have many sources but the facts are there and i hope you will accept it. i would love to write as much fact as i know or find on reliable sources. this is my first work, i will edit and improve it daily so if you could accept it, it would be a nice help for me to start on wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bhutan sports (talk • contribs) 16:06, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification

Hello there,

I am new to using Wikipedia and am having trouble with posting an article about my client, a film, television and theatre actress.

I saw you left a comment stating that IMDb is not a reliable source of information. Any chance you could help me understand how one would cite original personal information such as her biography and filmography? Any clarification would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks in advance and I look forward to hearing from you at your earliest convenience.

(2020visions (talk) 17:14, 29 June 2018 (UTC))[reply]

First you need to read WP:COI, Wikipedia is not a venue for promoting your client. IMDb is not a reliable source for establishing notability. We only summarise what reliable, independent published sources have to say about a subject. If there are no such sources then we cannot have an article. Theroadislong (talk) 17:24, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ian Firth

Many thanks. He's certainly worth an article and I don't think the author's seeking to promote him, just proud of his student's considerable achievements. All the best. KJP1 (talk) 21:26, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Truly amazing SATAbeta (talk) 19:27, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

refs Norbert Küpper

now including even more refs. valid? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mziegle (talk • contribs) 19:14, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

independing refs added. hopefully matched the criteria. Thx. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mziegle (talk • contribs) 20:01, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NPP Backlog Drive Appreciation

Special Edition New Page Patroller's Barnstar
For completing over 100 reviews during the 2018 June Backlog Drive, please accept this Special Edition Barnstar. Thank you for helping out at New Page Patrol and keep up the good work. Cheers! — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 01:57, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please what I am actually looking for is to have a domain that I may be in a constant review of my works on it. With it seeing be in the websites and media alike for accurate sources and educating. Thank you Anthonia Ezemonye (talk) 22:15, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

publication: OCMQAH Monthly Diary Publishing Press.

Date: 1st July, 2018.

Bobby Gutkaiss

Hi there. I understand this was one event, but a little boy was murdered, his murder was potentially linked to another notorious child-killer, and his case remains unsolved. I'm trying to help ensure that his story doesn't disappear, plus he belongs on lists of other unsolved crimes. How can I get this story published? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SeparatePowers76 (talk • contribs) 14:21, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Article on Christopher Barner-Kowollik

Dear Theroadislong,

Thank you for reviewing my article. I did my best to add the missing references for the article and I removed the blog entry you mentioned. It would be great if you could let me know if the references are now up to Wikipedia standards or if they need further improvement.

Thank you for your help! It's greatly appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Staugingersdisciple (talk • contribs) 07:09, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I appreciate your help. I hope I have succeeded in sorting out the references now. With regard to COI I should state that Ian Firth was one of my students in the 1970s but there is no COI. I have followed his career at a distance. We are still acquainted since we are both Fellows of the same professional organisation and have been honoured to be former Presidents but there is no other technical, commercial or business relationship. There is no question of remuneration or other type of reward. I have striven to make the biography of Firth objective and unbiased. Firth is, as you say, eminently notable as a structural engineer and bridge designer. We are both SME or domain experts in structural engineering due to our professional qualifications and experience.

Ian.Kirkland76 (talk) 15:21, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 06:50:48, 5 July 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Dr. Venkat Sumantran


Hi I am trying to create a Bio Page for Dr Venkat Sumanthran. His achievements are not listed in any main stream media can we still create a Bio Page for this person?

Dr. Venkat Sumantran (talk) 06:50, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't. Wikipedia has no interest in what the articles subject wants to say about himself, only what reliable sources have reported.

Wikipedia is only interested in what people who have no connection with the subject have published about it in reliable places. The article should be limited to a summary of what such independent sources have said about them. If there are no sources then we don’t have an article.Theroadislong (talk) 08:16, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

For submission of Nirmal contractors

Sir,the company was a very reputated company in the local region hence this is important for the company to have a wikipedia page so that users can eaisly understand about the company and the references that was used their was showing as blog but actualy company buy a domain nirmalcontractors.tk which redirects to the blog and hence it can be used as used in the other companies wikipedia article.Sir, the page was very important for the society.Recwiki (talk) 12:07, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You need to establish notability by adding references that show there is widespread in depth coverage of them in reliable sources independent of them. We are not interested in what they have to say about themselves, blogs or otherwise. Theroadislong (talk) 12:09, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

sources

hey I just want to say I had forgot to source my page on Barbara Sletto. I Have found two reliable sources found from her website joinhyc.org and https://www.linkedin.com/in/barbara-sletto-65238b70. sorry for what happened I didn't see the source box but now I have this is the completed topic on Barbara Sletto — Preceding unsigned comment added by KEATON TENCH (talk • contribs) 16:06, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Her own website and Linked in are of no use whatsoever for establishing notability, we need widespread in depth coverage of her in reliable sources independent of her. Theroadislong (talk) 16:11, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

I couldn't start my own userpage, and someone else had to do that for me. I don't know how you did that but thanks, I still need help with the sandbox; is it just for experimenting? what happens when you submit a draft for review on your sandbox? — Preceding unsigned comment added by KevinW7 (talk • contribs) 16:20, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

KevinW7 Yes your sandbox is a space for experimenting and viewing the results, you can ignore the submit button, unless you consider that you are proficient enough to draft a new article. Theroadislong (talk) 16:44, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Great American Doll company

Can you please edit my wiki draft? I thought i took the promotional terms out. Please help edit it. Thank you Uncoveringcelebrityhistory (talk) 02:17, 7 July 2018 (UTC) Uncoveringcelebrityhistory (talk) 02:17, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Leman_(transport_company)

Hi - You have rejected my article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Leman_(transport_company) . Did you notice that I added a link to an article in Berlingske, a very major Danish newspaper? Do you even read Danish? Would you like a translation of the article? Are you aware that there is already an article on Danish Wikipedia, of which this is basically a translation? Gjensen (talk) 20:09, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability, we need multiple in-depth coverage, the fact that Danish Wikipedia has an article is irrelevant. Theroadislong (talk) 20:19, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Typo in Title

Hi and thanks for approving my post for "Helgesias of Sinope." Unfortunately there's a typo in the title, which should be "Hegesias of Sinope" (no L). My apologies for that (it was my first post). I don't know how to fix a mistake in a title. Are you able to help me? Thank you, Budapest Joe

Corina Brouder - lawyer

Hi,

The source was in Talk, which was apparently overlooked, added by her mother:

As stated earlier today: "Corina is a licensed attorney and this is the second time we have changed what was written. Corina's juis number from the State of Connecticut is 439201, issued in 2017."

But I have a web page which states this as well.

In fact the false info which I replaced earlier today was not removed by wikipedia:

"Corina is also an unaccredited lawyer who was not sworn in after completing the Connecticut Bar exam [1]."

It can clearly be found that she *is* on that website so that's what I will try and add.

https://www.ctbar.org/members/?id=51879484&hhSearchTerms=%22brouder%22

Which also links to http://zdlaw.com/

Although admittedly she is not listed under B.

Rovsky (talk) 12:22, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Coming back to Corina Brouder's page, this person has been changing information on the page:

"Dragonslate"

With the disinformation being:

"Corina is also an unaccredited lawyer who was not sworn in after completing the Connecticut Bar exam [2]."

(cur | prev) 22:30, 6 July 2018‎ Dragonslate (talk | contribs)‎ . . (4,869 bytes) (+141)‎ . . (undo | thank) (cur | prev) 22:26, 6 July 2018‎ Dragonslate (talk | contribs)‎ . . (4,728 bytes) (-19)‎ . . (undo | thank)

(cur | prev) 03:36, 23 February 2018‎ Dragonslate (talk | contribs)‎ . . (4,780 bytes) (+9)‎ . . (undo | thank) (cur | prev) 03:15, 23 February 2018‎ Dragonslate (talk | contribs)‎ . . (4,771 bytes) (+77)‎ . . (undo | thank)

Has only accessed your page:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Dragonslate

This may affect her career. She suspects foul play from some party she has known in the past, but there is no proof.

Perhaps the person could be blocked? Although of course under any other username or not logged in, they can come back again.

=================

The disclosure of actual checkuser data (such as IP addresses) is subject to the privacy policy, which requires that identifying information not be disclosed except under the following circumstances: 

       With the permission of the affected user;
       Where the user has been vandalising articles or persistently behaving in a disruptive way,
=================

Sorry to be troubling you,

Kind regards,

Rovsky (talk) 13:57, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You will need to declare your conflict of interest. Theroadislong (talk) 15:11, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MRS Communications notability

MRS Communications has a Journal Citation Reports impact factor, which is usually sufficient to satisfy the first criterion (C1) for academic journal notability. It is also listed in Scopus. What other evidence of notability do you think is necessary? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.252.20.193 (talk) 16:34, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I could be wrong but I don't think the draft satisfies WP:GNG Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Feel free tore-submit and let another reviewer take a look. Theroadislong (talk) 22:27, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ashton House, Beetham

Hi Theroadislong,

Firstly, I would like to thank you for your interest in my family home and to let you know that I am new to the publishing conventions of Wikipedia.

I have tried to upload information about my home following years of extensive and painstaking research carried out and verified by top academics in the field of architectural history at the University of Oxford, where I subsequently received a distinction for this work and a place to read for a doctorate on the subject. My research primarily relied upon my own expertise as an architectural historian (specialising in country houses for over three decades) and the extensive primary sources which were contained within the house and which are now held in the local public record office in Kendal, Cumbria. The reference [CRO(Kendal)WDX948], which I have used for those records was provided to me by the local government office and whilst the records are not available online they are available in hard copy to the visiting public. I should point out that this research is being published as a book next year by an prestigious academic publishing house who have the work peer-read.

In terms of your first reference, the official listing mentions a datestone of 1678. It does not state that the building was built at that date, which in fact it wasn't. This datestone was repositioned off an adjoining family dwelling. The family records evidence this.

I hope that this is of help. I am in no way trying to disparage your history of my house, but would prefer any information published on the internet about it to be factually correct. Please feel free to contact me for any information which you feel may help you in this objective, I am more than happy to assist you where I can.

Yours truly, Gordon Fairclough FSA(Scotland) MA Lincoln College

Oxford — Preceding unsigned comment added by HistoryofArchitecture (talk • contribs) 11:40, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ashton House Beetham

Please see the following link to verify my reference given at Cumbria County Archives ;

http://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/c/F23873

I would be very much obliged to you if you were able to help me to use this reference in the correct format for Wikipedia.

Best wishes, Gordon Fairclough — Preceding unsigned comment added by HistoryofArchitecture (talk • contribs) 11:47, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ashton House Beetham

I should also point out that I am happy for you to publish the information in your name on Wikipedia providing it is factually correct.

Best wishes, Gordon — Preceding unsigned comment added by HistoryofArchitecture (talk • contribs) 11:52, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not an Auto biography.

The article that i created is not my auto Biography. I chose a username that was actually the article that I wanted to create. The actor is 43 years old now while im 18. Its not me and not related to me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 39.42.11.218 (talk) 13:35, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well that contradicts what you said here [1]? " I want to change my username from my real name for the fear of harassment etc" Theroadislong (talk) 13:40, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It is not my real name, it is a real name which I failed to express. Shall I correct my mistake there too? [[[User:Good Cop Sam|Good Cop Sam]] (talk) 13:42, 13 July 2018 (UTC)][reply]

Hello from slotmachiner and question on article resubmit

Good afternoon @Theroadislong ,

Thank you for looking at my article submission for Kaihan Krippendorff. I went through and reworked, basing all of the information off of articles I found from jstor, google scholar, or grade A media news sources. Can you let me know what you think of the changed article?

I also read through your article and noticed that you seem to be interested in Staffordshire pottery – I am into collecting antiques as well and two summers ago found an excellent piece created by Enoch Wood in 1820. Underappreciated art in my opinion. Thought you might find that interesting!

Best regards,

Slotmachiner--Slotmachiner (talk) 19:42, 13 July 2018 (UTC)Slotmachiner[reply]

  1. ^ https://www.ctbar.org/
  2. ^ https://www.ctbar.org/
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Theroadislong&oldid=850126351"