Jump to content

User talk:Cn5900

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by FastilyBot (talk | contribs) at 10:01, 19 June 2022 (BOT: Some of your contributions may require attention). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)


October 2018

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Tân Uyên District, Bình Dương has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:25, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

[edit]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Mường Tè District. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Jim1138 talk 10:23, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Mường Tè District. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jim1138 talk 10:29, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Mường Tè District. Jim1138 talk 10:42, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jauerbackdude?/dude. 11:17, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Cn5900 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm trying to make useful edits, I don't know why you see them disruptive, User:Jauerback Cn5900 (talk) 11:29, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Going to unblock both editors. Will explain in more detail below in a minute. Floquenbeam (talk) 17:48, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cn5900 (talk) 11:29, 21 November 2018 (UTC)}}[reply]

I find the block to be quite harsh for an apparently well-meaning newbie, esp. when there was no proper effort in communicating with him (except by template bombing) and that the blocking admin has no reservations, I will ask for the unblock to be granted.

And, Cn5900, if you see that your edits are being reverted, please don't revert any further and create a new thread on the corresponding t/p detailing about why you think that your edits are correct. Subsequently, please allow the opposing editor a reasonable time-span to respond in the thread. See WP:Dispute Resolution. Also, remember that, edit-warring is frowned upon and we don't care about the quality of edits, whilst disbursing blocks under the purview of the same. See WP:3RR for the brightline in the regard and WP:BRD for our optimal editing model.

Best,∯WBGconverse 11:58, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi Cn5900, I've unblocked you because this situation spiraled out of control a little, and I'm hoping it gets back on track. I'll unblock both of you, and maybe we can reboot. As WBG says above, please don't re-add info - even if you're sure you're right - if someone is removing it. Instead, discuss it on the article's talk page. I've protected the page for 3 days to encourage you (and those who disagree) to use the talk page. If you hav ny questions, you can post them here; I may not be around to answer, but there are probably a few people watching this page who can. --Floquenbeam (talk) 17:49, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note for people watching: This isn't a rogue unblock, the blocking admin said somewhere (I think on Ritchie's talk page) that someone could unblock if they thought it best. --Floquenbeam (talk) 17:59, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

[edit]

Please don't rename pages that are under a requested move discussion as you did at Tân Châu, An Giang Province. If the closer finds a consensus to move those pages, then the closer will rename the pages. Thank you for your contributions and for your support in this. P. I. Ellsworth, ed. put'r there 00:04, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you added a 'delete' tag to a dozen or more redirect pages after you started the move discussion here. No-one is going to delete those pages while the discussion is under way; the closer of the discussion will delete them if that turns out to be necessary. Meanwhile, it'd be helpful if you'd remove the tags – you can see which pages have them by looking at this category. Thank you, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 15:01, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Also, do not re-add speedy tags to pages like Quảng Bình District. By now it should be obvious that you need to list them at RfD. Continuing to add speedy tags is asking for another block.----Fabrictramp | talk to me 17:22, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Do not move via redirecting

[edit]

Launch a proper move request, please. I just spent ten minutes cleaning up after you. El_C 16:37, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not moving anything, I was just adding more entries to the disambiguation page. Cn5900 (talk) 16:43, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, you are: [1] [2] [3] [4]. And do you not know how to indent your comments? El_C 16:47, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I was just fixing the redirects so that they point at the correct intended targets. Why would those need a move request? I thought move requests are for moving the page title. I think what you were mentioning was redirects for discussion. Cn5900 (talk) 16:54, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'm trying to make sense of what you're doing. It looks like it started with this move — but does the city really have "City" (uppercase) in the title in standard English translations? (Then you changed a whole bunch of redirect targets.) El_C 16:56, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that's what I was doing. In Vietnamese, hòa bình itself is a noun and it means "peace". Many geographical locations used it as their names. Therefore using the name Hòa Bình for that city will cause serious misunderstanding. About the uppercase "city", yes that should be the standard English translation. If the word "city" is included in the city name, then it should also be capitalized. For example, Ho Chi Minh City, New York City, ..... Cn5900 (talk) 17:03, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Understood. I think I was able to fix everything. The problem was that you were moving a page that had already been moved, so some confusion ensued — including errors on my part, for which I apologize. Thank you for your patience. El_C 17:06, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, thanks for your understanding Cn5900 (talk) 17:12, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hậu Nghĩa

[edit]

I replied on my talk page, but apologies for the confusion, you are right and thanks for your good work! Polyamorph (talk) 05:45, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hoa Binh (disambiguation)

[edit]

Hello, Cn5900. You recently reverted my changes to Hoa Binh (disambiguation). That is all part of the process of making a better encyclopedia. I just wanted to point to MOS:DAB, the Manual of Style for Disambiguation pages, in case you are not aware of it. There are some rules specific to disambiguation pages, such as only including one blue link per bullet point, that my changes were meant to address. Happy editing, Cnilep (talk) 09:33, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tân Thành (town) moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Tân Thành (town), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 01:51, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vĩnh Tế (commune) moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Vĩnh Tế (commune), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 18:20, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Thanks for creating Long Châu, An Giang.

User:Onel5969 while examining this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

You must provide a valid source for these stubs. Simply using the same source over and over again, when it doesn't mention the location is not acceptable.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 TT me 18:23, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969:, please explain why the source I provided ([1]) is not valid. That's the website from General Statistics Office of Vietnam, in which information about all administrative subdivisions can be found. The articles I created just simply includes informations such as the name of that administrative subdivision, which province and district it belongs to. These information can all be verify in the source I provided, so isn't that reliable enough to you? That source store information about locations all over Vietnam, in order to find it, you must click on the specific province, and then that district Cn5900 (talk) 18:27, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sources have to mention what the article is about. The source you provided, while a valid source, doesn't mention the communities you are using it on. While that source may be used to find info on those communities, that's not a valid way to reference. Simply do the search for the community, and then link to the correct page. Onel5969 TT me 18:39, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If you say so, then you will need to review all similar articles on those communities that was created before mine. Many of those doesn't even have a source. Vietnam is still a poor country, so not every communities have their own website link, especially communities in rural area. The only website about the communities I can provide you with is the website about the district, in which will include information on those communities. Cn5900 (talk) 18:48, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I see what the issue is, you can't link directly to the individual entities (the url doesn't change as you get deeper into your search). Hmmm... I think the best thing to do is add a "notes" section, where you explain, as you did on my talk page, where to look. Take a look at what I did at Draft:Long Châu, An Giang, and if you think that will work (or come up with something different), then make the changes and I'll move them back into mainspace.Onel5969 TT me 18:50, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Onel5969: Let's agree on that Cn5900 (talk) 19:01, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Onel5969: I'm done with adding notes to the draft, please consider moving them back to mainspace. For the next articles I create, I'll just cite the source first, then I'll come back to add notes to every pages later. Cn5900 (talk) 19:27, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi guys, I just made an edit to Long Phú, An Giang to put the note with the reference. Do you think this looks a little better? Regards. Hughesdarren (talk) 00:02, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Much better, Hughesdarren - Cn5900, please use this new format. Onel5969 TT me 00:04, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
And Cn5900, please don't create stubs without the proper references. Slow down and do each one correctly. Any improperly referenced articles will be moved to draftspace. If you have enough time to create 50 stubs, then you have enough time to create those stubs properly. Onel5969 TT me 00:08, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Onel5969 please be patient. I'm going back to add locations to all of them now Cn5900 (talk) 00:12, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Do it as you create them. There's no reason not to. You're wasting other editors' time. BTW, I think that what you're doing is important, since we need more folk from Vietnam to contribute. My nephew lives in An Hoi, so I know a little bit, but please do it the right way. Onel5969 TT me 00:16, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Onel5969:, what I'm doing is that I create for all community for the province first, and will add to each later. Creating and citing simultaneously is very time-consuming. Since I have to create, and check the website at the same time. It's just the internet here is loading pretty slow. Just give me until tomorrow. Everything should be there by then Cn5900 (talk) 00:14, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Onel5969 also I think you meant Hội An, the famous old town Cn5900 (talk) 05:25, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging of Draft:Tân Thành (town)

[edit]

I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on Draft:Tân Thành (town). I do not think that Draft:Tân Thành (town) fits any of the speedy deletion criteria  because "unused" is not a valid speedy deletion criterion, especially for a page created less than a day ago. I request that you consider not re-tagging Draft:Tân Thành (town) for speedy deletion without discussing the matter on the appropriate talk page. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 20:30, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Thanks for creating Mỹ An, An Giang.

User:Willbb234 while examining this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Good article, but please see WP:KITTENS. Thanks.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Willbb234}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Willbb234Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 20:51, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mỹ Long, An Giang has been accepted

[edit]
Mỹ Long, An Giang, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sceptre (talk) 00:13, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mỹ Xuyên, An Giang has been accepted

[edit]
Mỹ Xuyên, An Giang, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sceptre (talk) 00:14, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mỹ Bình, An Giang has been accepted

[edit]
Mỹ Bình, An Giang, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sceptre (talk) 01:38, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bình Thủy, An Giang has been accepted

[edit]
Bình Thủy, An Giang, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sceptre (talk) 01:39, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bình Khánh, An Giang has been accepted

[edit]
Bình Khánh, An Giang, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sceptre (talk) 01:39, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your article Thanh Bình

[edit]

Information icon Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Thanh Bình to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. — Sagotreespirit (talk) 18:21, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ward 1 (Vietnam) (October 13)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:
The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Ward 1. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Only the notable wards should be listed, and merged to Ward 1 disambiguation
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:37, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Cn5900! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:37, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Talk pages

[edit]

Hi there. I see you have created lots of stubs. When doing so, please create a talk page for the article and review it so that the article doesn't add to the large and evergrowing backlog. Thanks, Willbb234Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 20:53, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Phong Hiep (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Long Hiệp
Phong Hiệp (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Long Hiệp
Phong Hung (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Long Hưng
Phong Hưng (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Long Hưng

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:38, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Scope of a discussion

[edit]

I reverted your deletion of nine redirects from the discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 October 11#Phú Hiệp, Cà Mau because you removed them without explanation. Whatever discussion transpired to that point was in the context of the original nomination; you can't silently change the context in midstream once the discussion has begun, even if you're the nominator. If you want to add items for consideration, you should prefix them with a note that you've done so belatedly, and probably with an explanation as to why. If you want to remove some, possibly in response to the discussion to date, you should strike them out, again with a comment in the discussion as to why But striking out is probably a bad idea once anybody has agree with deletion or alteration, because then the final disposition of those pages should be left to the group. Largoplazo (talk) 13:03, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vinh Trung, Bac Lieu

[edit]

Hi! What's happening here? What appears to have happened is that you took our page on Vinh Trung, Bac Lieu (which was a redirect to Hồng Dân District), overwrote it with content about a different village, Vĩnh Trung, Hậu Giang, and then moved it to that title. I know nothing about Vietnamese geography, but that does not appear to have been done in accordance with our policy and practice. Can you clarify? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:32, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to have done the same at Phú Hiệp, Đồng Tháp. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:47, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Phong Hiep (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Long Hiệp
Phong Hiệp (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Long Hiệp

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:34, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Dong Phu, Bac Lieu" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dong Phu, Bac Lieu. Since you had some involvement with the Dong Phu, Bac Lieu redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 17:21, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ward 1 (Vietnam) (October 24)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Mirror Cracked was:
See the previous review comments left by AngusWOOF. The issues raised have not been addressed.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
The Mirror Cracked (talk) 01:16, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bắc Kạn Province

[edit]

Hello! Given your recent involvement in various Vietnam-related discussions, I am wondering if you would weigh in on the following:

  1. There are still a few incoming links to the redirect "Ngân Sơn (town)", which was deleted per this discussion. Given the note in the discussion that Nà Phặc has never been called Ngân Sơn or been the district capital, how should these links be handled?
  2. You created the redirect Phong Điền (commune in Cà Mau Province) during a two-part move of the article Phong Điền, Cà Mau. Since the article was at the redirect title for only 2 weeks and is an unlikely search term, do you have any objections to deleting it? I would be comfortable deleting it as routine housekeeping.

Thanks, -- Black Falcon (talk) 05:04, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ward 1, District 10

[edit]
Notice

The article Ward 1, District 10 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable as a ward separate from the city.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dolotta (talk) 13:26, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ward 1, Gò Công

[edit]
Notice

The article Ward 1, Gò Công has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication that the ward has any notability beyond being part of the city.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ward 1, District 8

[edit]
Notice

The article Ward 1, District 8 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable by itself.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dolotta (talk) 14:17, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ward 1, District 11

[edit]
Notice

The article Ward 1, District 11 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable as a ward itself.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dolotta (talk) 14:18, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ward 1, District 3

[edit]
Notice

The article Ward 1, District 3 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not notable as a ward

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ "Administrative subdivisions". General Statistics Office of Vietnam.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Cn5900&oldid=1093874634"