Jump to content

Talk:Ivanka Trump

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Elinias1 (talk | contribs) at 03:48, 17 April 2024 (→‎Is ivanka trump jewish: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

footnote #20 to town & country 146.203.129.25 (talk) 16:00, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Info on RNC Co-Chair election

I added the fact that Lara Trump was elected to the Co-chair position of the RNC please feel free to edit the section of the article as you wish its kind of a stub currently and needs more information about it paytonisboss (talk)

Out of date information

The Footnote section has,

"Ivanka Trump is sometimes also called a 'Senior Advisor to the President' (or sometimes a 'senior advisor to the President', without the upper case 'S' and 'A'), even though that is actually the title of her husband Jared Kushner, while her own title is 'Advisor to the President",

which is written in the present tense, although her father hasn't been president for several years.

'Is' should be changed to 'was' in several places, or the Footnote should be removed. Recommend the latter as it is is of marginal, if any, interest several years after it was applicable. 217.42.2.32 (talk) 03:04, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @217.42.2.32
Do you have a reliable source stating this information? Paytonisboss (talk) 16:08, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A reliable source stating that Trump is no longer president of the US, hence the present tense is incorrect? Good point! Of course, Trump is still president and so Ivanka is still in the role. Make America (Something) Again? 217.42.2.32 (talk) 07:14, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
hello @217.42.2.32
according to WP:RS you must have a qualifying source that has information on your statement untill then that footnote stands
if you have any questions feel free to contact me via my talk page---> (talk)
best regards, Paytonisboss (talk) 16:06, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, Paytonisboss, this isn't a factual issue that requires a WP:RS to be verfied. This is a style issue about what verb tense to use when describing a position she no longer holds. --ZimZalaBim talk 16:14, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
oh @ZimZalaBim my bad I'm still learning when to apply wprs and when not to Paytonisboss (talk) 16:18, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Ivanka Trump/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: CtasACT (talk · contribs) 17:24, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CtasACT - Afternoon: is this ready to be passed? No rush, of course. Cheers, Tim O'Doherty (talk) 16:35, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Tim O'Doherty Thanks: i have looked over it thoroughly as stated, but the only improvement i could say adding a bit more to the introduction part of the article at the top and adding sources for that if expanded, other than that the article meets all of the objective requirements to a Good article status, of course for featured article it would need to be a lot more different in structure and stuff since it is a higher tier of Wiki's standards for the Best of the Best, but for Mrs. Ivanka Trump all of the citation(s), images, layout manual and exc meets the bar test Wikipedia has agreed on for it to be rewarded a GA status. There really isn't anything to be said, unless someone else comes in, if not then i think it indeed passed. Wait for 3 days for someone to join if not then i think its finished. CtasACT (talk) 20:59, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi CtasACT, the review below does not indicate which sources were checked to see if they supported the text and to see if there was any plagiarism. The article also has a lot of WP:Proseline and similar choppy prose, which does not suggest clear or concise writing. The article has a section which is entirely empty except for a main link; if this is an important topic that is enough to fail broadness on its own, if it is not important this should not be a section. The lead is incomplete, not covering some of the article's main sections, although the expansion to the lead does not need more sources as suggested. CMD (talk) 01:50, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Aha you're right, as WP:Proseline states 'Sometimes proseline is a bit sneakier,' so as we agree the sourcing is not the problem the structural integrity would be, so i would suggest you to give a throughout break down one some specific issues which sub-section/section(s): Because i do think that this could be fixed really quickly within 3 days and making this GA go through. Since on WP:Proseline it has a "Example of a proseline and a possible resolution" section which can help it. Well i will let the contributor know to fix this problem. Sincerely thanks! CtasACT (talk) 02:14, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have let the nominator know about this, again i think this article is 90% done, only some minor structural changes are need as you said as sections and the Proseline, if the nominator is willing they could fix the problem within 2-3 days if not this article would need to be put on hold waiting for recommended changes and then i do think this article would meet any and all GA status requirements (It already meets the Verifiable, NPOV, Stable, Images). Thanks for your vigilance and discreet notice! @Chipmunkdavis CtasACT (talk) 02:23, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Chipmunkdavis Since you have edited Wikipedia far longer than i have i would suggest for you to correct and all Broad coverage and well written categories within this review, please in you're free time give some fixs for @MSincccc if they are still confused on the instructions CtasACT (talk) 02:29, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am not well read enough on the article subject to make a comment on broadness beyond what is immediately apparent in the article. If the Cultural depictions are important, that section should have a couple of paragraphs explaining them. If the cultural depictions are not that important, the section should probably be replaced with a sentence or two elsewhere. In the lead, at the least a sentence or two should be added to cover Early Life, Social and political causes, and Personal life. The current lead is weirdly abrupt, for example dropping "alongside Jared Kushner" without any indication of who Jared Kushner is. A few of the sources in the lead are not used elsewhere, which indicates the lead was not developed as a summary of the body. CMD (talk) 03:56, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Chipmunkdavis I have made changes according to WP:PROSELINE but I would greatly appreciate it if you could fix the "Trump campaign and administration" section as I am presently running short of time. I would return tomorrow hopefully. Regards @CtasACT and @Tim O'Doherty as well. MSincccc (talk) 09:47, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@MSincccc I think the article is going very well you did fix the section problem it appears on the GA advice, i think you could finish the Trump admin problem through today and tomorrow! And have thought out: thinking the likelihood this article would be given a GA status by me would be by March 20 or most likely the Maximum, of March 21 if the changes are put in! CtasACT (talk) 22:54, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@CtasACT I think I have made the changes you suggested. Please go through the article and let me know of your decision. Regards MSincccc (talk) 14:59, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Passed "good article" nomination

1. Well written?: Pass Meets Wiki guidelines specifically passes the WP:Proseline
2. Verifiable?: Pass Pass (Only small amounts of primary which are used with caution sources Wikipedia:No original research § Primary, the majority are from News sources which meet Wikipedia:Reliable sources guidelines)
3. Broad in coverage?: Pass Pass (It gives her personal life well without going to deep in addition to giving good in dive but yet the summary point of view in her political activities, again since she had a relatively normal executive position, the in-depth dive wouldn't be necessary as the extent of Presidents or Secretaries of State for example (Even for them broad coverage at an extent is required), which this article balances in it's generalization, which is good in this article and it follows)
4. Neutral point of view?: Pass Pass (Overall gives and leans more to the objective factual side rather than lean towards any political or social ideological views of either sides: it gives occurrences, political events, social events and such and responses of such rather than opinion and only opinion which follows Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)
5. Stable?: Pass Pass (No edit wars or conflict regarding article material, only minor edits)
6. Images?: Pass Pass (Reasons:All images have valid copyright tags that meet Wikipedia's Copyright and a non-free rational use: All images are Public Domain or Creative Commons licensed images or audiovisual)


Discussion re: cultural depictions

Cultural depictions

Discussion welcome at Talk:Cultural depictions of Ivanka Trump ---Another Believer (Talk) 13:54, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 19:55, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(
)
Official portrait, 2020
Official portrait, 2020
  • ... that Ivanka Trump (pictured) was the first Jewish member of a U.S. first family? Source: Oppenheim, Maya (September 12, 2016). "Ivanka Trump seems confused about the religion she converted to". The Independent. Archived from the original on February 17, 2017. Retrieved May 29, 2017.
    • Reviewed:
Improved to Good Article status by MSincccc (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

MSincccc (talk) 05:19, 21 March 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: None required.

Overall: Nice job getting this article to GA! It's very well-written and put together and I think the hook is rather interesting, although I would perhaps drop "holds the distinction of being" in favour of "was", just for the sake of concision. Grnrchst (talk) 12:18, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Grnrchst Then you are most welcome to make the changes. Thanks for your appreciation but this could not have been possible without the reviewer CtasACT and user Another Believer who helped me with making the necessary changes.
  • I hope this hook is sent to the Preparation Area soon so that it appears on the Main Page this week @DYK admins: . Regards MSincccc (talk) 02:17, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Is ivanka trump jewish

Converting to judaism does not make you a jew. She is a giyoret. You are born a jew, not converted to. Elinias1 (talk) 03:48, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ivanka_Trump&oldid=1219335057"