Jump to content

Talk:Google

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 124.171.83.244 (talk) at 09:56, 11 October 2007 (→‎vandalism: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Good articleGoogle has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 14, 2004Featured article candidateNot promoted
April 25, 2005Featured article candidateNot promoted
December 20, 2005Good article nomineeListed
May 17, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
March 3, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
April 13, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
Current status: Good article

Template:Maintained

Template:V0.5

Archive
Archives


badware.org blocking websites, google censorship

Google is now partially censoring websites that are believed to have spyware or badware. You get a badware page about warning you and the text URL of the link but there is no link to continue on.

This should be added to controversy. Ie, what gives right google to decide what is badware and warn when they dont warn about other sites like smoking, etc. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Wikitalk009 (talk • contribs) 11:41, 24 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

A bit strange that you can't tell the difference between visiting a web site that installs unwanted software on your computer and a site with words about smoking on. ••Briantist•• talk 23:18, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It is not censorship, they ae still lettinng you go to the sites. It is just so that people's computers are safer. "Smoking on" is a social issue, and google is not censored, exept for porn and stuff like that. And in China. ffm yes? 16:54, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Google Tv

gogog google! The creator of googles father was born in 1947 and he was in the vietnamese warIm sure many of you may have heard of this video by "Infinite Solutions" If not look it up on google blogs. They seem to show proof and show you a way that is is real and how to get it. Other people claim to have tried it, but very few people seem to be showing proof. My question is, is this a hoax?

- Yes. Technostalgia 23:14, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We should at least give it a mention in the article. No people gave proof, but no ones proved it wrong either. 24.164.18.127 02:47, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:CITE. We are not a directory of rumors, slashdot is for that. We need reliable information, not speculation. ffm yes? 16:51, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The other videos produced by Infinite Solutions seem to be hoaxes. For example, see the very serious sounding video showing how to use a cell phone with ethernet wrapped around it suspended inside a salad bowl to get better wireless networking (!!).


The entire article is a joke, clearly written by Google staffers. A gigantic multinational organisation which has shown exponential growth and which keeps information on it's users ?indefinitely and what do we get? Nonsense about April fools jokes. Some info on their financial operation, takeover plans etc is essential. Everything that's wrong with Wiki at the moment can be seen in this article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Borsabil (talk • contribs) 15:18, August 25, 2007 (UTC)

To whoever just got rid of the vandalism

Nice work! I just noticed it and by the time i@d logged in it was gone! The Adept 11:54, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I got a lot of stick from User_talk:Grindingteeth for doing it. ••Briantist•• talk 12:20, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The edit of Google by User:Grindingteeth at issue is this one. [1] This is a clear violation of several Wikipedia core policies, including WP:NPOV, WP:V, and WP:NOT. I agree that Grindingteeth appears to be acting in bad faith and is possibly a vandal or a troll. If he keeps up that nonsense he should be blocked.--Coolcaesar 04:15, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Trip Across the Atlantic Easter Egg

Should the article mention the "swim across the Atlantic" easter egg within the easter egg section? See step 23 at [2] as an example. Tugttw 02:52, 8 April 2007 (UTC)tugttw[reply]

I removed it as Google has removed this 86.25.3.115 16:26, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Google... Coordinates?

Whats up with the coordinates at the top right of the google article? I haven't seen this on any other article. IWhisky 15:44, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Check out Vancover. All of the articles that are cool enougth have one. Just kidding. It is for most articles that have actual locations, it is how google is able to intergrate the wikipedia into google earth. ffm yes? 19:29, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
In short: it is the coordinates of the headquarters of Google. --Iamunknown 04:58, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Question

when you do a search on google, underneith each link is the web adress followed by a number. like "www.1234567.com -57k" what would the 57k mean? J.L.Main 01:02, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Straight from Google help (http://www.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=35891): " This number is the size of the text portion of the web page, and gives you some idea of how quickly it might display. You won't see a size figure for sites that we haven't fully indexed." --Iamunknown 04:56, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank YouJ.L.Main 19:35, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am removing the Google Holiday Logo from the article. The official Google Doodles page states: We've put them in this online museum for your amusement. Please do not use them elsewhere. As such, it is a violation of their image licensing uses, and should be removed. It does look nice, though. –- kungming·2 (Talk) 07:23, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

HEY GOOGLE BOY, FIRSTLY GET A LIFE AND SECONDLY THERE IS NO NEED FOR AN ANNOUCEMENT OF THE REMOVAL OF A HOLIDAY LOGO. Your Mocker Bigous Dickous! SHUT UP Kungming2 Thank you for the update. 

   -iKrolm

I have renominated this article for featured status. The April 2004 nomination cited lack of references and cultural impact info as the primary reasons of failure. Both of these reasons have since been addressed. The May 2006 peer review cited lack of organization & lack of a substantial LEAD section, both of which have been fixed. I think we're ready for FAC status now. Dr. Cash 01:29, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here is what my script says:
<quote>The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question. bob

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas.</quote> Thanks, ffm yes? 21:52, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Changes to Article Summary

Recently, the article's summary section has been dramatically increased in size and wording. I'm not certain on who made these changes, but I feel that it could hinder the nomination for being a featured article. There are also other changes that really need to be made to this article, because recently things have been unnecessarily edited, leaving just a bigger mess.

Does anyone else see the motive in me re-editing the changes to the summary section? Thanks. Mambo Jambo 16:44, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at the edit history, it should be obvious that I edited the LEAD paragraph, trying to make it a better summary of the article conforming to standards in WP:LEAD. If you can improve this, please do. Dr. Cash 17:32, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Enterprise products

Currently:

In 2007, Google launched Google Apps Premium Edition, a software suite for businesses that provides e-mail, instant messaging, calendar, word processing, as well as a spreadsheet program.[43] This product is targeted primarily at the business user, and intended to compete directly versus Microsoft's Office suite, with a price of approximately $50 per user per year compared to $500 per user for Microsoft Office.[43]

This section needs to be re-done. "Docs and Spreadsheets" needs to be mentioned in the previous section about Applications and not here (they're available without the Apps Premium Edition); this service does not compete with MS Office (even "Docs and Spreadsheets" don't really compete with it). And there's nothing approximate about $50 per user per year fee. -Olegos 23:47, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your suggestion. When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the Edit this page link at the top. The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes — they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to).

It appears you *don't* need to log in to edit this particular page.

Current lawsuit

Anymore info on the lawsuit would help out as it comes avaiable. Maverick423 02:30, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Point of view starts here click history to view:

Information on the Viacom/Youtube lawsuit has been added to the History of Google article and removed from this page.

Google Phone

I have added a section on the proposed Google Phone, along with references; it seems to be big news.

Also, these pages need a general cleanup (deleting discussion comments which have been noted and used, changing links etc.).

HiraV 19:43, 19 March 2007 (UTC)HiraV[reply]

Information moved to the section on products. It is not notable enough for its own main section. Plus, it's largely speculation anyways, but considering that it got a decent amount of press coverage, a brief mention might be noteworthy. Dr. Cash 19:02, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Google Inc. is developing its own mobile phone, according to industry insiders and analysts, while a Google official in Spain last week acknowledged the company is "investigating" such a project.

Google isn't commenting directly on leaks from Europe and the United States which describe a low-cost, Internet-connected phone with a color, wide-screen design. Newspaper and blog reports in recent months have Google shopping its phone design to potential mobile phone manufacturing partners in Asia.For more on the subject visit :http://www.webdesigningcompany.net "Mobile is an important area for Google," Google spokeswoman Erin Fors said on Friday. "We remain focused on creating applications and establishing and growing partnerships with industry leaders to develop innovative services for users worldwide. However, we have nothing further to announce."

Gadget enthusiasts who only two months ago were obsessed with the potential revolutionary impact on the phone industry of Apple Inc.'s iPhone device -- due out in June and at prices starting at $500 -- have shifted their attention to whether Google is developing an even lower-cost phone.

Slogan

Is that slogan real? Or is it vandalism..?
Ferdia O'Brien The Archiver And The Vandal Watchman (Talk) 16:28, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'd suggest you follow the link as it answers your question. --Bobblehead 16:36, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I did, but that wasnt very convincing either, I've seen more compecated vandalism then that.
Ferdia O'Brien The Archiver And The Vandal Watchman (Talk) 12:52, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"The Google"

I noticed that "The Google" (without the quotes) redirects here. I'm thinking it should have a separate article, as it is a Bushism. After all, Internets has its own article. What do you think about this? TanookiMario257 00:01, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Um, no. A separate article on that isn't needed. I hardly even hear the term, "the google." Maybe by Bush, I supposed; but then, it should just be added to the Bushism page. Dr. Cash 19:00, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Google TiSP

Isint that an all fools day joke ?
It sure is. I actually fell for it but the obvious references to the bathroom finally made me realize what day it was. Good ol' April Fool's Day. - 75.35.237.117 10:27, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
TiSP isn't the only april fool's day joke by google this year. Gmail also has a joke for Google Paper. Dr. Cash 18:59, 1 April 2007 (UTC) also i hate[reply]
In order to do google tisp it would take an enourmous amount of work on google's part to put those things in the sewer pipes, its an april fools--Olavid 20:02, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

April Fool:Newest Google guffaw

Monday, April 02, 2007 Newest Google guffaw: High-speed Internet through your toilet By Associated Press

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) -- Presiding over a company with a market value of $143 billion apparently gives Silicon Valley's most famous billionaires a good sense of humor -- and a case of corporate potty mouth.

Senior executives at Google Inc. launched their annual April Fools' Day prank Sunday, posting a link on the company's home page to a site offering consumers free high-speed wireless Internet through their home plumbing systems.

Code-named Dark Porcelain, Google said its Toilet Internet Service Provider (TiSP) works with Microsoft Corp.'s new Windows Vista operating system. But sorry -- septic tanks are incompatible with the system's requirements.

The gag included a mock press release quoting Google co-founder and president Larry Page, a step-by-step online installation manual, and a scatological selection of Frequently Asked Questions. On some Google sites, the company's official logo -- a lticolored Google that changes according to the season and on holidays -- substituted a commode for the second g. There's actually a thriving little underground community that's been studying this exact solution for a long time, Page said in the facetious statement. And today our Toilet ISP team is pleased to be leading the way through the sewers, up out of your toilet and -- splat -- right onto your PC. Marissa Mayer, a Google vice president, called TiSP a breakthrough product, particularly for those users who, like Larry himself, do much of their best thinking in the bathroom. TiSP is the latest April Fools joke at the Mountain View, Calif.-based company, where hijinks pervade cubicles all year long. In blogs, Google employees joke about the recent injection of green dye into milk in the cafeteria, while another talks about zany underlings filling the vice president of engineering's office with sand. Visit me at http://www.webdesigningcompany.net. Anyway Eric Raymond, a software developer in Malvern, Pa., and author of the New Hacker's Dictionary, said TiSP nailed several important tenets of hacker humor.

The concept of free wireless access parallels a legitimate, four-year deal between Google and EarthLink Inc. to provide free wireless Internet service throughout San Francisco starting in early 2008.

As part of the spoof, Google said TiSP would be offered in three speeds: Trickle, The No. 2, and Royal Flush.

The leitmotif of hacker humor is precise reasoning from utterly bizarre premises, and once you're in that groove, you're absolutely fearless about going deeper, Raymond said. We also have a tendency to deliberately zigzag between highly intellectual humor and utter slapstick. The more zigzags you can manage in a single spoof, the funnier it is. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Charlesmartinn (talk • contribs) 05:27, 5 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Article summary

I've rephrased the wording of the lead paragraphs a bit, hopefully to make it a bit shorter and more concise. Let me know how it looks. If you have any ideas, please leave them here or feel free to edit the lead. Dr. Cash 18:20, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Web Hosting

Hello,

Does anyone know whether Google is concidering starting a webhosting project, offering webspace for people to host their site? It seems as a good idea and logical step for Google to take.

Thank you, LAUBO 17:34, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article's talk page is not the appropriate place to discuss such things, but you might want to look at the article on Google pages, as it would probably answer your question. Dr. Cash 19:46, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Revenue

The revenue numbers listed in the sidebar are different than the revenue information listed at the bottom of the page. Can someone tell me why, or better yet, fix it with whichever number is the correct one? --Micah Hainline 21:04, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Google IPO

I believe there should a separate article on Google IPO. The IPO was notable for many reasons, not least that a record 28 banks were in the underwriting syndicate

Google hits

Google hits Redirected to Google search instead of Google. Google hits is closer to the search engine, not the corporation. Rjgodoy 07:07, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Google Personalized Pages now iGoogle

I'd add that but I think the page is locked. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.68.90.97 (talk) 10:17, 1 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

JIZZ! Now that I got your attention, please add content to do with igoogle.

Addition

Hi guys, I recently wrote a piece that aims to better explain the acquisitions by Google and have posted it as an external link on the Google page. The edit section on the site asked me to mention it here so... here I am! I hope the community finds it useful.


-B —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Babar54 (talk • contribs) 06:20, 3 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

new google homepage

There has been a new Google web page posted on about Monday, May 7, 2007

The link to the photo is located here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Newgoogle.png

Lookatme2 21:05, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can we please stop adding **every** incarnation of the google homepage to the article. The homepage has hardly changed since the company started, and this particular one adds such minor differences and is so horizontally oriented that it really won't add anything to the article. Dr. Cash 03:17, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think it would be a nice new google homepage http://google.vc/google.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.186.109.232 (talk • contribs)


Google Earth

Google Earth really ought to be listed under "acquisitions" since it was acquired by purchasing Keyhole, the company that originally developed it... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.79.186.127 (talk) 13:18, 13 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

I personally don't think that searching for "google" on wikipedia should take you to the article on google.com. I think that the word "google" is actually a mathematical term. Let's not help propogate stupidity on the internet, but rather keep things clear. And no, I'm not signing my post. That's totally uneccessary and needs to be omited from the wikipedia discussion procedure. It doesn't cut down on anything.

The statement that all Google Earth images can be found elsewhere should be removed or modified, since the images on Street View are unique to Google Earth. 70.118.225.241 09:15, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Another slight revision which should be made regarding Google Earth. One cannot read license plates on Google Earth, not even with the street view. 66.35.34.87 17:16, 23 August 2007 (UTC)Pioneerman[reply]

blog.outer-court.com

Please review WP:EL. Wikipedia is not the place to advertise your personal blog site. Dr. Cash 21:40, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

googles former domain: Deja.com

I think the article should mention something about google former domain, deja.com

Interestingly, navigating to deja.com brings you to groups.google.com

Bgbop15 Will, NJ

Google did not originally own deja.com. Their "original" domain has always been google.com. What happened, is that they purchased the usenet news content from DejaNews, which is why deja.com now points to google groups. See this link for more information on that. Dr. Cash 19:14, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Twenty percent" time

"All Google engineers are encouraged to spend 20% of their work time (one day per week) on projects that interest them."

No engineers at Google work more than 5 days a week? --Dreaded Walrus t c 01:27, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Acquisition of Feedburner

Is Google's purchase of Feedburner worthy of being put into the acquisitions section of the article? --Jmccorm 03:47, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request to add a reference to US Patent 5,748,954, which is relevant to the Google technology

I would like to place a reference to US Patent 5,748,954, which is relevant to the Google technology.

Specifically, I would like to change the last sentence in the first paragraph in the History section to read: "A small search engine called Rankdex was already exploring a similar strategy[7] and Michael Mauldin, a researcher at Carnegie Mellon University who later founded the search engine Lycos, had already patented a similar technology covering link popularity and anchor text within US Patent 5,748,954.[8]

The footnote reference [8] could link to the patent at the following link to the USPTO: [3]

Gculliss 03:09, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Overlinking under "Googleplex"

Where it says "assorted video games, Foosball, a baby grand piano, a pool table, and ping pong. In addition to the rec room, there are snack rooms stocked with various cereals, gummy bears, toffee, licorice, cashews, yogurt, carrots, fresh fruit, and dozens of different drinks including fresh juice, soda, and make your own cappuccino," EVERY OTHER WORD is a link. Seriously, who doesn't know what yogurts or carrots are? I don't know how an article can be considered "good" when there is such excessive and irrelevant linking.--143.58.196.120 12:30, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[[hi:गूगल]] —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 59.94.136.199 (talk • contribs).

Done. :) --Dreaded Walrus t c 18:01, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Environmental Records Section

I would like to add an Environmental Records Section to the Google Wiki Page. I feel that it is relevant to the company's image and moto. Here are a few sample programs at Google that support environmental issues:

  • $5,000 subsidies for employees buying hybrid cars.
  • Company dining facilities that serve organic sustainable foods.
  • Charitable contributions to organizations that fight global warming.
  • On-site farmers markets.
  • Composting of food waste and use of compostable plates and silverware.
  • Use of green fuels and solar power.
  • Fully subsidized employee bus pools for commuting employees.

Thanks. --Orcasgirl 19:55, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orcasgirl, I agree. I have gone ahead and started an "Environmental Record" section, beginning with the basic information about google.org. Please feel free to incorporate some of the information that you have outlined above to the now existing section. Sea.wolf4 01:55, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The motto...

Isn't the Google's motto "Dont'be evil" instead of "You can make money without doing evil"? The aricle states:

Google's corporate philosophy includes statements such as, "You can make money without doing evil,"

But there is no source for that. Google gives us more results for the first version of the motto (click) than for the second (click). Google Story (a red link? impossible :>) — ISBN 055380457X and ISBN 978-0553804577 (Amazon link) also tells us it's the first version. Any ideas? Andrij Kursetsky ⊗ 20:29, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, and there is also an article about the motto... Andrij Kursetsky ⊗ 20:46, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

locations?

It's weird to me that this article doesn't even list their various locations and labs, or at least the major ones. Is a short section on this appropriate? — brighterorange (talk) 14:31, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. Nearly all large corporations have many, many locations; have you ever worked for one? Should we list the hundreds of GE or IBM locations in those respective articles? Wikipedia is not a directory, a yellow pages, an indiscriminate collection of random information! See Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. --Coolcaesar 20:40, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Two Public Offerings

No mention in the article that Google shares have seen two public offerings. -CKL

Article is a mess.

Needs a complete re-write. -CKL

Please be more specific. I completely disagree with you; while the article could certainly be improved, I wouldn't say, "it's a mess." And I definitely wouldn't say that without adding a few details about WHY? I thought it was a mess. Dr. Cash 06:11, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agreement with Yahoo

What about its agreement with Yahoo by the years 2000 - 2001 ? I first knew Google because its logo and a link were on Yahoo. I think many others knew Google after the same thing, but this site doesn't say anything about it.

Number of horns on a unicorn

See http://www.google.com/search?q=number+of+horns+on+a+unicorn . I found it mentioned on reddit, it seems that the easter egg that churns out 42 is not the only one using this medium. The 42 easter egg is probably considered more notable, but I think it should mention that others exist...? - Zero1328 Talk? 11:39, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Slightly unorthodox request

Hello, I'm trying to reach a human at Google that knows where once can make a request to have a bot do automated searches (the TOS are clear that this is a no-no without permission). The help email addy gives no joy (they simply quote the TOS back).

I've had an offer from Kylu to resend the request from a Foundation email address, but we're still laking a destination for the request.

I'm guessing here that Google employees check this page out every so often. If you are, please contact me. — Coren (talk) 03:37, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"An eye tracking experiment revealed that college student users have substantial trust in Google’s ability to rank results by their true relevance to the query. When the participants selected a link to follow from Google’s result pages, their decisions were strongly biased towards links higher in position even if the abstracts themselves were less relevant..." [4] Brian Pearson 17:42, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I didn't make that separate. Brian Pearson 01:48, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Google in another scandal.

Should they turn their user's info to the Government of Brazil or should they protect Pedos?

Logo?

I am just curious as to what the reason may be for using the "non-shadowed" logo [5] as opposed to Google's "official" shadowed logo. It does not appear that using the image of their official logo [6] violates any copyright law. Am I missing something? --207.61.219.218 15:39, 7 September 2007 (UTC)John —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.61.219.218 (talk) 15:35, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Google caving in to the demands of some groups

There's nothing in the article about Google's history of giving in to the demands of some groups. The Church of Scientology demanded that they demote anti-Scientology websites in favour of the official ones. George W. Bush demanded that a site critical of his policies be demoted on searches for the phrase "dumb motherfucker". China demanded that Google remove links to sites appearing in searches about "freedom" or "democracy". Google has consistently acquiesced to the demands of these groups and others. --Darth Borehd 23:13, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Some of your points are addressed in the article on Censorship by Google, I would assume. If there are still things that you feel should be included, feel free to bring them up on that talk page. :) --Dreaded Walrus t c 23:24, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pronunciation?

Im an castillian spanish speaker (as my first language), and I don't realy know how to say "google" correctly. I've heard people say it "gúgul" "gúgle" and very few "gágl" (pronuncieted all in Spanish). Can someone put an pronunciation mp3 for non-english speakers? thanks. Comu_nacho, —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.222.251.235 (talk) 05:14, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Google in Iran

News : Iran blocks google http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=42402 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.108.67.119 (talk) 13:49, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Enterprise products

Is there any reason Google Search Appliance or Google Mini isn't listed in the section? --soum talk 10:57, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is just a part of Wikipedias increasing restrictions and censorship. Too bad because actually I had some new information on data mining protocols at Google but I'll just blog it. You are not helping your cause Wiki because yes a LOT of people use library computers and it is certainly not their fault. Again your loss... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.127.78.65 (talk) 19:14, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Google.org

The wiki on Google states that Google.org is a not-for-profit organization, however the Google.org wiki states it is a for-profit organization. The correct answer is that Google.org is a for-profit organization, that is why they are able to lobby and fund beneficial commercial sector initiatives, they do however support and help finance other not-for-profit organizations. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Animelion (talk • contribs) 01:46, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

References

Reference one looks screwed, maybe someone that knows what they are doing could fix it? Sancassania 00:57, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I donn't get it...

Today (September the 27th) Google change their logo to "Google's 9th Birthday". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.138.107.174 (talk) 10:53, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

perhapses you have source(s)? anyway this article is Protect... 85.250.236.93 21:12, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Wikipedia should have the automatic correction google has in its search in case someone doesn't know how to spell. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.155.151.226 (talk) 23:53, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

vandalism

Uh, what's the point of having a page protected if it's vandalised? C'mon guys, fix it up.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Google&oldid=163773367"