User talk:De728631
Barnstars
|
The Rosetta Barnstar | |
| I see you hang out at WP:PNT all the time, so… Keep up the good work! Admiral Norton (talk) 23:03, 6 September 2008 (UTC) |
|
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
| {{{Heres a barnstar for being such a good friend.}}} Bulldog180 (talk) 22:21, 14 October 2008 (UTC) |
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| For your great work with my article Frymburk. The Rolling Camel (talk) 16:11, 4 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
The Article Rescue Barnstar | |
| For rescuing EnglishRussia.com, and inadvertently taking part in an experiment. ϢereSpielChequers 15:31, 14 October 2009 (UTC) . |
fyi
I moved Brandon Neely back to article space. Geo Swan (talk) 21:07, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
Hello, Do you remember me? I remember that you are German and probably you could improve this article, I have added two resources, but they are in German so I do not understand them. Also you could use the article on Deutsch Wikipedia. Thank you!
Mohamed Magdy (talk) 14:20, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for your notice and addition. Mohamed Magdy, Thank You! (talk) 21:23, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
RE:محسن خدادادی
Thank you allot for the notice, and I ll make sure that I dont do this mistake again, enjoy editing MaenK.A.Talk 16:58, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
Tagging of 2532 (Milton Keynes) Squadron
Please note that WP:CSD says "Contributors sometimes create pages over several edits, so administrators should avoid deleting a page that appears incomplete too soon after its creation." You tagged this page within 3 minutes of its creation. May I suggest doing new page payroll from the older section of the back log? DES (talk) 20:47, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- you said "Apart from that, I've seen CSD tags being handed out instantaneously with either Huggle or Twinkle, so I don't really see a need to change my practice." That seems to say that because others are acting poorly, you shouldn't stop doing so. I urge you to consider that this sort of tagging is in many cases quite WP:BITEy. DES (talk) 21:10, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
The Gilbert's Feed Band
I've moved it here: User:De728631/The Gilbert's Feed Band. Have fun with it! - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 16:18, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
How to scam for headshots
- I AfD'd it instead because I think that would work better in this situation. Feel free to get in on the discussion. Erpert (let's talk about it) 20:45, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
Courtesy note
You are receiving this note because you participated in this TFD. Some of these have been re-nominated here, where you may wish to comment. Thanks, –xenotalk 14:27, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Fred lanting
Hello De728631. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Fred lanting, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: known for being the author of is an assertion of notability. Thank you. ϢereSpielChequers 20:36, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
ϢereSpielChequers is offering you a Wiki Beer! Liquid refreshment promotes WikiHarmony and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the harmony by offering a beer to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Best served refrigerated (not applicable in England). Temperature and Alcoholic strength varies according to age, religion and geographic location of recipient, US residents below the age of 21 are best advised to keep this beerstar until travelling in a country with less ageist drinking laws. NB This Beerstar is compatible with all known fake IDs
Thanks for improving that article. ϢereSpielChequers 00:24, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
How to add the reference of an external page owned by me?
I am a new editor on Wikipedia. I am having a problem in adding a reference of a page written by me. Although after deleting the reference, the tag of copyright violation is there. Can anyone guide me how to add my page from external website? Secondly, how to remove the tag legally when not adding the reference?
Counter-vandalism
Hello! Such edits like [1] and [2] make severe obstacles to quick and clean vandalism elimination. First of all, after your two edits the article was still substantially vandalized. Second, there is an excellent tool to cancel all last bad edits from one source, which could be applied before your intervention, but which cannot revert a sequence of edits from more than one user. Please, request a rollback permission and fight vandalism in a civilized way or, if you have it not, then look to the page history and write the last good version over the current. Never revert vandals’ edits one by one. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 21:36, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
Naveen Nursing Home
Just a friendly note on Naveen Nursing Home. I declined the speedy request because there is a good faith assertion of importance (only hospital [in area] to have...). A7 only looks at assertions of importance, and is purposely a lower standard than notability. If you think the hospital isn't notable, then redirecting, prod, or AfD would be the way to go. Cheers! --Fabrictramp | talk to me 19:40, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
I saw your redirect to International Talk Like a Pirate Day. I reverted it back to a the A10 because it does not add any substance to the original article and it is not a title that someone would search on to find the topic in the English version of Wikipedia. My best to you. ttonyb (talk) 19:26, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- I'm fine with that, must've missed your speedy tag. De728631 (talk) 19:28, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
Being bold is one thing, but re-moving an article without discussion on the talk page and if there is not consensus for the move without putting in a requested move is disruptive. Likewise reverting to a version of an article (with some additions), which is the result of changes you have made to the article, without discussing the changes on the talk page of the article is also disruptive.[Revision history of Zieten Hussars] -- PBS (talk) 05:41, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
- Apology accepted, and now you should see my posting above in the light it was intended! However as you hadn't read the article talk page (where conversations about content should take place), I can understand, you taking offence at the above and posting to ANI. -- PBS (talk) 00:57, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
A Request for Help
Hi there De728631 :), I noticed your username on Translators Available German to English. I was wondering if you could help with updating Riaz Ahmed Gohar Shahi on the German Wikipedia? Riaz Ahmed Gohar Shahi on the English Wikipedia has been majorly revamped- particularly, its being treated as a BLP now, since no ones been able to find evidence of his death. I'm sorry to say I know little German, so I'd really appreciate your help in this :), although I understand if you don't have the time. Thanks in advance!Omirocksthisworld(Drop a line) 19:03, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
- No problem, thanks anyway :)! Omirocksthisworld(Drop a line) 19:41, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
SL
It's a good idea, but notice there is a delineation on the language disorder page between the two. I made some comments on the discussion section. Thanks. Jim Steele (talk) 17:28, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
thanks Decora (talk) 17:31, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
- You're welcome :) De728631 (talk) 17:48, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Thank you
Thank you for tell me my error, i´m spanish and i don´t dominate the english, please about me --Manuguay (talk) 18:51, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
OK
Ok I too contribuyo with the spanish wikipedia, but I like contribution to this wikipedia, About me --Manuguay (talk) 18:57, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
I've translated a new german article and I need again a proofreader.
- German source: de:Oldtimer Festival
- English Translation: Oldtimer Festival
I am grateful for any feedback indeed. THX, bzw. VIELEN DANK again --Pitlane02 (talk) 21:45, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
- Unbelievable, a new world record, THX alot. --Pitlane02 (talk) 22:42, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
- Is that possible, that you proofread my article again? (I've changed some parts) THX again --Pitlane02 (talk) 23:20, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: PERCEPTION OF THE STUDENTS OF HIGHER EDUCATION TOWARDS ENTREPRENEURSHIP
Hello De728631. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of PERCEPTION OF THE STUDENTS OF HIGHER EDUCATION TOWARDS ENTREPRENEURSHIP, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Original research is not a valid speedy deletion criterion - this has to go, but it will need a PROD. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 18:03, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
Vinland
I see the May issue of Damals isn't on their website, has it been published? Have you got a copy? Fascinating, thanks. Dougweller (talk) 18:51, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Tyrannobdella rex
|
On 21 April, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Tyrannobdella rex, which you recently nominated. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Thanks for this one Victuallers (talk) 18:04, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
Providence health & services, southwest washington
Hi, I created the site but would like it deleted as the tile is wrong, unless you can change the title? If so then I will redo the article appropriately to wikipedia's standards. If the title can't be redone no worries, can you please delete so I can start over and do it correctly? Thank you!
Okay I get what you're saying but I don't think you get what I'm saying. The page I created I didn't do correctly because I need it to be deleted.
If you determine this isn't a criteria of notability (which I would argue that it is) then...
Here's my concern--and I'm not sure how this will work...facebook is now linking pages to wikipedia articles. How are we supposed to get content to show up on these pages if there is no wikipedia article? SWSA MC (talk) 17:53, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
Here is the article I read: http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2362825,00.asp as well as the facebook article http://blog.facebook.com/blog.php?post=382978412130 as well as a facebook FAQ. http://www.facebook.com/help/?faq=17112
That looks to me like if you don't have a wikipedia profile then you are doomed to have no information and suitcase for a photo.
ps: we have coverage as a reliable secondary source. thank you for deleting. 15:31, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
Coat of arms vs. emblem
Some of the emblems are under coat of arms, yes, but that is a mistake made by the original author. Many of emblems have been retitled accordingly, while others still need to be. This is not a coat of arms; please see Coat of arms to see what constitutes one. Wikipedia should not perpetuate errors in terminology, especially simply because this area of study and the differences in terminology are little understood by the masses. [tk] XANDERLIPTAK 23:16, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
- I am not too familiar with moving aticles, so my apologies for not doing so properly. Half of th earticles seem to be properly labeled, while the other half are incorrectly labeled, so it seems to be an error on only some of the creators parts. I do not think common use applies here because there are clear guidlines that distinguish a coat fo arms, and because heraldry is not something commonly understood by the masses and thus not something commonly known. So I would like to correct the terms before Wikipedia helps spread the misknowledge and confuses more individuals. [tk] XANDERLIPTAK 23:03, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
Swissôtel The Howard
I entirely agree with your {{prod}} of Swissôtel The Howard and the reasoning behind it—I think it's a completely non-notable branch of a chain, and "5 star" hotel is meaningless in a British context as Britain is not a member of any of the hotel-rating systems and thus "star ratings" are purely self-certification by the hotels' marketing departments. However, be aware that when I proposed it (and the rest of that series) for deletion previously, it prompted an extremely bad-tempered discussion, so you may well get more of the same. (As it's already had a prod contested, technically it should now go to AFD as articles aren't supposed to be prodded twice.) – iridescent 15:24, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
Greater Cincinnati Aquarium Society
Hello, this article was nominated by you for speedy deletion due to its lack of notability. I attempted to add subsequent information that added to it notability but the article was deleted. I felt that the article did meet the notability guidelines, could you please review your decision and comment on this. --Theexiledmagi (talk) 15:29, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
Lighthouse
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:47, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
South Channel Pile Light
Hi, thanks. I had been meaning to reword things for some time now, that article must have escaped my radar. I shall attend to it when I have more time. Nick carson (talk) 03:07, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
Just an FYI, I opened an AfD for a disputed PROD that you tagged. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:22, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
Copyright problem resolved
Hi De728631 I have resolved the copyright issue with File:Csaba-Zvekan.jpg and granted permission under the GNU and CC . I am the sole owner of the picture and own all the rights to http://www.csabazvekan.com as well. Thank you so much
