User talk:DragonflySixtyseven

IMPORTANT NOTE: ADD YOUR MESSAGES AT THE BOTTOM, NOT THE TOP. OTHERWISE I MIGHT NOT SEE THEM. Because of their length, the previous discussions on this page have been archived. If further archiving is needed, see Wikipedia:How to archive a talk page.

Previous discussions:

Crocodillin

I understand why you buried this, but I have dug it up again and put it in Wikipedia:Article Incubator/Crocodillin, because I think with the help offered by Dr Britton (see User talk:JohnCD#Crocodillin) there probably is an article to be made here, though it will not be called "Crocodillin". I have also protected the title, as a precaution. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 22:52, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

YOU DRagony Sixtyseven are SHAME!

I am sorry if i write on wrong place,but i must leave this message because it happens second time you deleted my page;it was so wonderful written,a lovely story,and i am angry and ask:WHo did give you right to cancel my page?i hate this and i am very disappointed.Do you know how much time i needed to improve my post to make it looks great,and i think i didn't save copy of my writing.,It is really SHAME! If you looked at my page as propaganda,isn't that all we do and put in here,as well as all the articles and pictures for public use, belong to the same category,which you call:propaganda.How do you imagine everyone to know and read what we say and write? Please, give me back my page,i can't remember what i wrote and need to have it back!A beautiful piece you destroyed,do you mean you have such a right?Who you are?Do you write some beautiful stories as me?I doubt! my page name is Slavica66

Todorovic Slavica

my apologise to Crocodillin if i put this on wrong place,but i can't find it right.Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Slavica66 (talk • contribs) 12:41, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Plot Builder?

I noticed you deleted my contribution of Plot Builder today with a comment that it was "overly promotional". I specifically designed this page to be historical and informational in nature, and not promotional. I even emulated a long standing article for Final Draft since it was a similar product. Please help me understand what I can edit in order to make this page within the standards you are reviewing for. Thanks. -FalconDEW — Preceding unsigned comment added by FalconDEW (talk • contribs) 23:31, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

Thought you might want to know you're being discussed at Wikipedia talk:Article Rescue Squadron#Researching deletions and pending deletions. SnottyWong ^talk 00:05, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the response I posted over at the ARS, but as you probably don't generally hang around there I thought I should post it here too:

I'm sorry if what I said was rude, I was purely curious about the sheer number and the odd edit summaries. In retrospect, my comment regarding your talk page reads meaner than I meant it - I simply meant that if people looked at your talk page they could see that you had been asked questions on this topic a lot before and answered them. I'm assuming the not notable yets were speedy deletes. To clarify, I wasn't trying to suggest you were some sort of one man deletionist conspiracy :-)

Regards, - ManicSpider (talk) 01:00, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also, your explanation for the Users Own Good one made me laugh. I'm glad to know there's someone out there undoing our teenage-selves attempts to humiliate us for life! - ManicSpider (talk) 01:05, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Need Help Including Images

This is an awesome example caption. Pretty ponies are at the link :D

For the Showmen's Trade Review article I have six images, all in my possession, no copyright issues. Need direction to place them in the article. I refined the article today with several edits. After the images are placed, I think the article is complete. Can I sign it and give my email address? Thanks, Sunnyprime (talk) 01:31, 30 January 2011 (UTC)sunnyprime[reply]

To upload images, see WP:IMAGE. You should know that in order to put images on Wikipedia pages, you have to publish them under a free license. This basically means that you will allow anyone to use your images, or derivative works of the images, for any purpose, including commercial works, as long as they credit you as the author. You should be aware that if you do so, the license is not revokable.

As to how to put an image into the article once you have uploaded it, you can do that with this code as a template: [[File:Example.png|thumb|right|200px|This is an awesome example caption. Pretty [[ponies]] are at that link :D]]. This code (placed at the start of this section) produces the image to the right. You can modify the placing of the image (left/right/center), the sizing (200px = 200 pixels wide), and the caption to whatever you want. WP:IMAGE has more examples of how to add pictures to articles.

Articles generally don't have any contact information placed on them, and I would not recommend signing it or putting your email address on it. This would likely be interpreted as an attempt at advertising, and could lead to the page being deleted. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 01:55, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ... I have a very demanding job, so have not worked on this project for nearly a month - my apologies. Thanks for your instructions on images, which I intend to follow today. I am the daughter of publisher Chick Lewis and the images are my personal property - not the property of the magazine, so there are no copyright issues. The images of Chick Lewis I have selected to place on Wikipedia with this article I am happy to release with a Creative Commons license. There is one image of Showmen's Trade Review Magazine cover that I would like to include with the article. It has a photo of actress-singer Judy Garland on the cover. Please advise what, if any, copyright issues you have with that. Meanwhile, I will withhold it. I would like this Showmen's Trade Review article to enter Wikipedia's main space within the next few days to coincide with this year's Academy Awards presentations. Re: cutting Chick Lewis biographical details, I am probably biased, but I would like them to remain intact. I did much research to unearth these facts and this particular magazine is so much a product of its founder and his early activities, that I believe these facts are truly germane to the overall article. In addition, these facts add depth to the early history of movie-making in the United States. If you still want some cuts made, please indicate what you find to be unsuitable as I cannot read your mind. BTW, I am a second generation publisher - of the Environment News Service, now entering its 21st year. With thanks for your help, Sunny LewisSunnyprime (talk) 17:50, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sunnyprime, I think you have the right idea generally. Any photo that you took yourself (in your free time) is perfectly okay to upload, provided you agree to license it under a suitable free license. The magazine cover is unlikely to be permitted, unfortunately, unless your father was the sole copyright holder of that work before his death (in which case you would inherit rights). A low-resolution version might be permitted under the Wikipedia:Non-free content policy. Dcoetzee 18:34, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi... thanks for your advice. My father was indeed the sole copyright holder of the magazine cover before his death and I have inherited the rights. So I will upload it, I think it is a low-res version anyway. Just want to have an image of a magazine cover with the article. Now about the copy editing - is it still required before the article goes up? Sunnyprime (talk) 19:30, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you do own rights then by all means, please upload the best quality version you have - high resolution images are very useful to us. :-) Thanks for your contributions. Dcoetzee 19:52, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi... I have read all material re: images coding, sizing and uploading. I have correct coding and what I hope is correct sizing done. For sizing I have sized the images in the click-thru sizes and as I understand it, the system will produce the thumbnail images automatically. Is that right? Or should I upload two images - one thum and the other full size? In the uploading process I find I am asked to categorize the images. Here I have run into trouble. For instance, one is an image of STR editor and publisher Chick Lewis with Gary Cooper. Should that be categorized in People by Name? Should I put it in two categories? Lewis? and Cooper? Should it be in any other categories too? Thanks for your help in resolving these issues. Won't be able to do any more today, but can get back to it tomorrow evening.Sunnyprime (talk) 00:44, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

icebxx deletion

why is that not a valid user name

i drive scion xb and it looks like an ice box but icebxx is always available as a user name LOL

i'm trying to get involve as a contributor, i have an attorney writing different things who is an expert and i'm not sure how to get it to not be deleted — Preceding unsigned comment added by ICEBXX (talk • contribs) 20:47, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there. It doesn't look like the username is a problem, but more the article you tried to create about structured settlement attorneys. The first problem is that we require all information to be verifiable and sourced to reliable sources; this doesn't appear to be the case here - indeed, the attempted article has no references at all. The second problem is the inclusion of the information about Nizinski and Ahtirski. The way you have phrased it (and the way you've picked them out particularly) makes it look as if this article is an attempted advertisement, which is strictly prohibited. Both of those issues need to be fixed before it's an appropriate post here, and I'm perfectly happy to assist in any way I can.

A greater issue is that you say you have "an attorney writing different things". Bear in mind that content on Wikipedia has to be released under a free content license; if you are not the one writing it, you do not necessarily have the legal authority to release it. If you want to drop a note at the bottom of my talkpage (remember to sign it with four tildes, like so ~~~~ I'm happy (as a law student, and as an editor) to help out. Yours, Ironholds (talk) 21:09, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Note

I've cleaned everything out of all my subpages with the exception of userboxes and replaced with the speedy deletion box.

Profuse apologies for the misunderstanding.

RedSoxFan274 (talk) 05:22, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I can honestly say I've never heard of it. RedSoxFan274 (talk) 05:30, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, so one can download a version of that and then use the Wiki markup outside of Wikipedia, do I have that right? RedSoxFan274 (talk) 05:43, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Herzberg

Thanks for the move, I guess. I was actually planning to wait until I had improved the article a little bit with some secondary sources, in the hopes of a DYK and possibly a featured list. There's nothing to be done about it now, I suppose, but if you plan to move anything else I might have in userspace in the future, I would appreciate a heads up. Canada Hky (talk) 16:09, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Blake/flash

Just wondering, what was the reason for this? "Trim" isn't a very good explanation. _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 15:42, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I was using them as a source for notable flash games. I think I might have drained all I could from them though, so I will let them stay removed. _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 15:48, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Mental Roots of Sexual Orientation and Sexual Arousal

RE: 14:14, 31 January 2011 DragonflySixtyseven (talk | contribs) deleted "The mental roots of sexual orientation and sexual arousal" ‎ (I'm sorry, this just isn't an article. It's an essay.)

Hello Dragonfly

I would like to change my contribution from an essay to an article, but I don't know where to start. Could you please point to some parts of the deleted text, because of which it is considered an essay, and indicate how they should be modofied in order to become an article?

Thanks, YeDesalu — Preceding unsigned comment added by YeDesalu (talk • contribs) 02:26, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Florin Street Band

Hi there, I'm just wondering why you deleted this article which I spent ages writing? The only explanation was (apparent copyvio) But there were no copyright violations because I was closely involved with the project and sought permission? What will happen now is that members of the public will write random, misinformed articles about The Florin Street Band - how can that be good for Wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dreamingprincess (talk • contribs) 22:48, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dreamingprincess! Talk page stalker here... Basically, even if you sought out permission for the material, if you didn't write it independently then it's still going to be a copyright violation. Wikipedia is an open source encyclopedia, so in order for content to be allowed here, it must first be released into the public domain- you merely saying you recieved permission is not sufficient to release the material. Our legal team would need to get written notice from the copyright holder that the material was getting released into the public domain.

To be honest, as an admin looking at your article, even if it wasn't a copyright violation it would still have been deleted as a promotional article. Take a look at other articles on Wikipedia and then look at yours- surely you can see that the tone used in this article was inappropriate for an encyclopedia article? Think about whether an article like this would be put in a print encyclopedia like Encyclopedia Brittanica... it wouldn't- it reads like an advertisement. Keep in mind that it's not our job to make anyone look good or protect subjects from "random, misinformed articles", nor is it your job as someone clearly affliated with the band to create an article about it.

I urge you to read our guidelines for inclusion, specifically our notability guidelines for musicians, and also take a look at our instructions on how to make citations and find reliable secondary sources. This by no means indicates that there can never be an article about The Florin Street Band, it only means that you probably shouldn't be the one to write it. If you have questions or concerns, please feel free to ask me or DragonflySixtySeven by replying here. l'aquatique[talk] 02:05, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Clash: Rise of Heroes

Hello,

One of our users created a Wiki on our game and for some reason it was deleted. We have over 200,000 users playing our game and if you google our game, you'll find over 28,000 websites with articles about us. Can you tell me why our entry was deleted. You state the reason was "notability not asserted", but being new to Wikipedia I'm not completely sure what that means.

Thanks for the clarification! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Talonxz (talk • contribs) 07:05, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jnorthdur: Emilio Ghione

Thanks for your kind comments about my Emilio Ghione article. I am a Phd student in Italian visual studies at Durham University and my speciality is Italian silent cinema. Over the next year or so, I hope to improve the articles about Lyda Borelli and Francesca Bertini. Then, I shall move onto some less well-known actors, directors, films and film companies, which should be useful for the students that I will be teaching next year. Kind Regards, Jnorthdur (talk) 19:40, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Soham Railway Station weblink error

Hi just to let you know that one of the Reference links for the Soham Railway Station Wikipedia page at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soham_railway_station needs to be removed as it no longer exists

3. ^ Soham Train Station Campaign

You may want to replace that link to the following page instead

http://www.soham.org.uk/history/trainexplosion.htm

Kind Regards

Chris Scurrah Editor of Soham On-Line www.soham.org.uk —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.158.122.149 (talk) 20:50, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there...

You've seemed to have deleted User:RomeEonBmbo/Sandbox4 because of an "innopropriate use of userbox space." Is there any way I can have either the page or the source code back? Thanks. RomeEonBmbo (talk) 22:18, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DragonflySixtyseven. You have new messages at RomeEonBmbo's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

RomeEonBmbo (talk) 23:56, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Chip Wood

I was just wondering if there was any way I could see a copy of this article you deleted so if he wins the election I can recreate the article for him, without having to completly start over.

Thanks,

Skier23 (talk) 05:05, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Move of SHEBA

Hi Dragonfly. Thank you for your interest in Surface Heat Budget of the Arctic Ocean (SHEBA). I'm surprised that you moved it without discussion to Surface heat budget of the Arctic ocean. Note that, in doing so, you failed to capitalize "Ocean." Actually, since the article is about the project titled, Surface Heat Budget of the Arctic Ocean, not the concept, surface heat budget of the Arctic Ocean, all the words should be capitalized. I'm not ncecessarily against the move, but I would like to see it discussed, first, especially since the project was more widely known as "SHEBA." Sincerely, User:HopsonRoad 15:46, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Advice on a dispute

Hello. I noticed you read on the deletion review which i requested for appeal to nature. I have serious disputes with the attention of an editor involved now which i do not believe we will resolve ourselves, and i am not sure how best to take up with WP moderation process. Could you advise please? Thankyou. Lisnabreeny (talk) 22:14, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, i will take a break and i maybe have just gotten off on the wrong foot with the editor. No need for outside help now. Apologies Lisnabreeny (talk) 02:58, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bulfinch's Mythology

thanks i appreciate it. Decora (talk) 00:33, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

About ZK Spreadsheet

Hello,

You had deleted the ZK Spreadsheet page because of "(not yet notable)", but i found it exist in the Online spreadsheet page, can i recreate it and add more information about it ?

Regards.

Flyworld (talk) 11:38, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

About 4LW entry

Hi there,

Noticed that entry was deleted with the comments of:

18:36, 29 January 2011 DragonflySixtyseven (talk | contribs) deleted "4LW" ‎ (I'm really sorry. This is genuinely interesting, but there's absolutely nothing about notabilty or reliable sources. I mean, a community discussion on Reddit?! No.)

I'm the inventor of the "protocol" and detailed it in a blog post and it was evolved over a period of several hours on that reddit discussion after that. Surely the blog and the discussion count as reliable sources?

In terms of notablity would the various news articles referencing 4LW count?

Also I'm new to wikipedia so is the contents of the entry gone forever ?

Thanks

Rabidgremlin (talk) 20:08, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As requested some 3rd party sources for notability:

Gov't crackdown spurs initiatives to route around DNS - http://www.itworld.com/legal/129947/net-censorship-dns-alternative
Wiki Rehab - How to save Julian Assange's movement from itself. - http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/81017/wikileaks-internet-pirate-party-save?page=0%2C1

Lots of blog entries/threads etc:

Google Search: "4LW four little words DNS" - http://www.google.co.nz/search?q=4LW+four+little+words+DNS&hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&prmd=ivns&ei=MZBZTe3XDYP2swPZurGcDA&start=10&sa=N
Google Search: "alternate DNS 4LW" - http://www.google.co.nz/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-GB%3Aofficial&q=alternate+DNS+4LW&aq=o&aqi=&aql=&oq=

Rabidgremlin (talk) 20:35, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Restoration to userspace sounds good.

Thanks Rabidgremlin (talk) 21:09, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Selden Island article move

Thanks for your help with the Selden Island article move. I looked for the proper procedure for such cases, but to no avail. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wilford Nusser (talk • contribs) 00:52, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Café Dulcet Deletion

Hi - I understand that the article for the novel Café Dulcet by Chiquis Barrón has been deleted because notability was not asserted. Although this is a relatively new novel, it has received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources including the US Review of Books (http://www.theusreview.com/reviews/Cafe-Barron.html), the Tucson Festival of Books (http://www.tucsonfestivalofbooks.com/author/list), and the Latina Book Club (http://www.latinabookclub.com/2011/02/q-with-authorchiquis-barron.html) in addition to other non-internet media outlets.

If this is not enough to assert notability, I would greatly appreciate knowing how I can retrieve the information that was on the article for future use and reference.

Greatly appreciate your help.

Chikis218 (talk) 03:45, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

is my profile not complete? if the cause is that, sorry. Dhio - 270599 11:43, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

as i remember, maybe, i wrote my address. is that right? i just forgot a little. Dhio - 270599 13:14, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

sorry if i just ask something wrong. Dhio - 270599 15:00, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Café Dulcet Deletion

Thank you for your response. I understand the information is still accessible if one has administrator access to the system; I would greatly appreciate if it could be e-mailed to me. I'm not sure if an email is on file for me, but it can be sent to <REDACTED>. If this request must be made in a different manner, I would also appreciate instructions on the appropriate procedure. Thanks, once again.

Chikis218 (talk) 15:59, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:LiteralKa

Hi there. Please take a look at User talk:LiteralKa#February 2011, a user you blocked and possibly add an explanation to their question, since you have not left them a message about the block you issued. Regards So Why 23:49, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion: How can I improve?

Hi there, you just deleted 3 of my articles (Property Value Insurance/Mortgage Financing/Future Equity Agreement). You said "too much promotional".. how can I improve it? what can I do different? And can I find the deleted articles somewhere and keep working on them? Thank you for your help!!

StephUSA (talk) 20:25, 21 February 2011 (UTC) StephUSA[reply]

Survivor

Who says you have the right to tell me what I can and can not put on my page? If I would like to make that page again, how can I make it so only I can see it and it doesn't go everywhere? Please help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jcormier95 (talk • contribs) 02:11, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How To Become Clairvoyant

Ahhhh... Thanks for the help the other day and I completely understand about the content I added to the How To Become Clairvoyant page. Can you unlock it so I can further edit properly?

Thanks, -Sebastian

User page edit

Hi DS, I hope you don't mind this edit that I've made to your user page. Graham87 04:10, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, it's all good. Would adding one (or several) <br/> tags after each item preserve the spacing while still creating a proper HTML list? Just look at the source to see what I mean. Before my edit, your user page read like this with JAWS: "list of 1 items, foo, list end; list of one items, bar, list end". When I made the edit, it read like "list of ten items: foo, bar, bas ... list end". Anyway, I'll leave it to you. Graham87 04:21, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would, but I'm actually blind myself as it says on my user page, so I wouldn't know what I'm doing. :-) Graham87 04:30, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WHAT?!

Friends? Garage band? Oh no, no, no! They are not my friends or a garage band. They are an established musical group with a hit single, "MickWithoutGlasses/Orbit! MickWithoutGlasses (talk) 04:40, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Clairvoyant

I promise. Please unlock now. I'm just new to all the rules etc. Won't happen again.

Qui Tam Relator Libya Bombing Raid

Hello Dragonfly, I hope all is well in your world. It's good to be out of the hospital and feeling somewhat better. I need your expert advice regarding the best editors and administrators regarding the Libya Bombing Raid site. I have gathered a lot of information that is not mentioned on that page and everything I have in documentation is either through court documents and major newspapers and magazines regarding this event in time but only want to converse with the folks that keep their eye on that site. Can you steer me in the correct direction with the most reasonable and open overseers of this site. I look forward to your input. Thank you for your ear and patienceQui Tam Relator (talk) 19:33, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Qui Tam Relator Libya Bombing Raid

Hello Dragonfly, I hope all is well in your world. It's good to be out of the hospital and feeling somewhat better. I need your expert advice regarding the best editors and administrators regarding the Libya Bombing Raid site. I have gathered a lot of information that is not mentioned on that page and everything I have in documentation is either through court documents and major newspapers and magazines regarding this event in time but only want to converse with the folks that keep their eye on that site. Can you steer me in the correct direction with the most reasonable and open overseers of this site. I look forward to your input. Thank you for your ear and patienceQui Tam Relator (talk) 19:40, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confused?

I don't think I know what I'm doing here DS, but thanks for helping me contact Billy Hathorn. I saw your msg on his page; very appreciated. (Hopefully I'm posting correctly and in the right place). Tylerclarkburke (talk) 22:24, 28 February 2011 (UTC)tylerclarkburke[reply]

Deletion of MickWithoutGlasses user pages

Oh, I can't do that. I'm not on my computer. My real computer is broken. Can't you just give it time? MickWithoutGlasses (talk) 04:02, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You lied. You said you'd give me one day, and you didn't. You deleted them right away. MickWithoutGlasses (talk) 04:05, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You may wish to comment at the Help Desk thread here -- John of Reading (talk) 08:59, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wait a sec--you KNEW that DJ Boonie was real, too?! I didn't know you were a fan of her! :D MickWithoutGlasses (talk) 02:47, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help

Thanks again for your help today Dragonfly. Much appreciated — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidfarzam (talk • contribs) 00:37, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

About "HolocaustResearchProject"

Minor heads up: I responded on my Talk page. I'd prefer to keep the dialogue there, for the sake of tidiness. Thanks. -The Gnome (talk) 18:23, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete an article as not being an article?

Seriously, and in detail, why did you delete the article "Truth As Somebody"? Lawyeditor (talk) 05:11, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

An article is not an essay if it describes a view held around the world, and is the formal view of more than a billlon people

Send to enolfi@neo.rr.com Lawyeditor (talk) 05:44, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

== Entry deleted 16:36, 3 March 2011 DragonflySixtyseven == Hello, I see that you deleted "Golden Frog Inc" ‎ (overly promotional). I would like to repost it and will make it more neutral. I can add in cited references and adjust the language so that it pertains just to documented facts. Open to any specific suggestions you have.

Grr....

Listen: I will stop for now... but I will have my revenge, for your meddling in our affairs... Bonelayer12864 (talk) 23:20, 9 March 2011 (UTC), aka Officer Lyki Noryje[reply]

The Special Barnstar

I wanted to give you one of these a while back, but I never got round to it due to me being on Wikibreak. You really deserve it.

		The Special Barnstar
		Thanks for helping me so much with my request for rollback and all the trouble with my old account. You've made my view of Wikipedia very favourable when I came back and that is one of the most important things of all, on Wikipedia. One of the reasons I lapsed into inactivity, which caused me to forget my password, was because I had gained an unfavourable view of Wikipedia. Now I view Wikipedia favourably and wish to contrbute to it again. Once again, thank you. 123 Hedgehog 456 20:54, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

123 Hedgehog 456 20:54, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Modified citrus pectin

You recently moved this page to the mainspace (causing a double redirect), and I noticed the user requesting the AfC is listed in the references and thus has a COI. Not sure what to do about it at this point. Thanks. – Ajl^talk 10:12, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh Realy?

Great and thanks for deleting that hard work bud... you know it really feels nice for some guy like to go off and constantly be a jerk to people. And if you've read closer it's a SANDBOX page you had no right to delete it and you may be able to have the power to block me or delete my stuff i don't care you're just rude and uncaring so make some others user's hard-worked sub pages deleted! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Victoryleader (talk • contribs) 18:13, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

YOU DRagony Sixtyseven are SHAME!

I am sorry if i write on wrong place,but i must leave this message because it happens second time you deleted my page;it was so wonderful written,a lovely story,and i am angry and ask:WHo did give you right to cancel my page?i hate this and i am very disappointed.Do you know how much time i needed to improve my post to make it looks great,and i think i didn't save copy of my writing.,It is really SHAME! If you looked at my page as propaganda,isn't that all we do and put in here,as well as all the articles and pictures for public use, belong to the same category,which you call:propaganda.How do you imagine everyone to know and read what we say and write? Please, give me back my page,i can't remember what i wrote and need to have it back!A beautiful piece you destroyed,do you mean you have such a right?Who you are?Do you write some beautiful stories as me?I doubt! my page name is Slavica66Slavica66

Todorovic Slavica

my apology if i put this on wrong place,but i can't find it right.Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Slavica66 (talk • contribs) 12:47, 14 March 2011 (UTC) I forgot to say,if some links i put,by your judgment,should be removed,you could send me a warning or notice and so to make my page still to exists!What shame on you to remove it so easy,while not thinking of how much effort and love someone put in own work! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Slavica66 (talk • contribs) 12:57, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Polyspermy

Please note that you were completely wrong. Can you you read what the Talmud states? I've provided the link of the full text of the original source. It really doesn't mention the term "cell" - but rather the term: "sperm/semen" only, however, the Talmud does discuss poly-spermy (poly + spermy, i.e. "multy-sperm"), and it even states clearly that a woman can get pregnant by sperm/semen of two men - at once - on some rare biological conditions (indicated ibid.), and it also states that those conditions enabled Goliath to have one hundred fathers! Anyway, note that the section about the Talmud was under the title "mythology", so I really don't know what's wrong with that. Next time, consult before you remove. Eliko (talk) 18:19, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can you revive my userpage draft articles? I need them desperately for a project. MickWithoutGlasses (talk) 03:51, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I need to show it to my classmates. It's for school. MickWithoutGlasses (talk) 04:18, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, the nonfiction writing project. MickWithoutGlasses (talk) 04:22, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Th-th-th-that wasn't nonfiction. They are real people. MickWithoutGlasses (talk) 04:36, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Patrol links script fixed, slight change in usage

I've fixed the patrol links script. The fix necessitated a change in how the script actually works. Clicking the link will no longer open a new page; it now patrols the page in the background using AJAX. It un-highlights the page in the list when it finishes patrolling it. Right-clicking or center-clicking the links (probably) won't work. You'll need to bypass your cache to use the new version. Let me know if you have any issues. Mr.Z-man 05:25, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why delete CQRS

Hello, I was just wondering why the CQRS-page was deleted? In my opinion it is a complementary resource to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Command-query_separation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tok jocke (talk • contribs) 09:38, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Because it was basically a redirect to a non-existent article. DS (talk) 13:13, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What in the world?

I demand an explanation for these edits 1 2 and the deletion of one of my userbox pages or I am reporting you. NYyankees51 (talk) 16:38, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DragonflySixtyseven. You have new messages at NYyankees51's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

17:15, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

17:55, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Informational note: this is to let you know that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Regards, NYyankees51 (talk) 21:18, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Literary awards

Please look more carefully at what was changed before doing a wholesale revert. Also I'm working on adding a new article for the one red link which is why I kept it there. Green Cardamom (talk) 17:10, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your concern, but that article is riddled with awards that are external links only (ie. no blue links). If you were serious about it, why so much energy watching the article for edits and posting in name space, but no effort to actually fix the article? If you do, don't just delete the awards, many of them many actually have blue links. Green Cardamom (talk) 17:18, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Knapman

Thankyou for all your help with publishing this article. As you know it is my first time on Wikipedia. Thanks again

WebManAtTheNetShop (talk) 14:53, 18 March 2011 (UTC)WebManAtTheNetShop[reply]

Please Restore Nukoko

Hi, I'm just writing to clarify the Nukoko page that was deleted and hopefully have it restored.

"23:27, 5 March 2011 DragonflySixtyseven (talk | contribs) deleted "User:Nukoko/Nukoko" ‎ (regrettably, this is not an appropriate use of a userpage. Wikipedia is not a free webhost for your organization.)"

As a representative of Nukoko, I would like to make it clear that we are not using Wikipedia as a webhost for our organization. We created the page as an informational page. We are a non-profit organization like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Engineers_Without_Borders_%28Canada%29 and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_the_children that works towards empowering children through education.

Please consider restoring the page, we would greatly appreciate it.

Thanks, Nukoko (talk) 22:11, 21 March 2011 (UTC) -Nukoko — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nukoko (talk • contribs) 22:08, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sandbox page for Pediatric Home Service

On March 15 you deleted the sandbox page I had set up for Pediatric Home Service with the explanation "(regrettably inappropriate use of userpage)." In fact, Wikipedia encourages users to experiment on their user pages, which is what I did. See the post on Your first article, "If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox or your user page." Can you please restore, or at least provide further clarification? Jlh0910 (talk) 17:45, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jlh0910. Your article was deleted by DragonflySixtyseven because it can be considered inappropriate and would violate what Wikipedia is not. While your contributions are always appreciated, the draft was stale. At the time DS deleted it, you had not contributed to it since February 13, 2011, and therefore could be considered a stale draft. The deleted sandbox also was a little bit "spammy" and contained few, if none, secondary sources. All these things make it justifiable for Dragonfly to delete it. —GFOLEY FOUR— 00:15, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your response! Is there any way I could get a copy of the deleted article, preferably with some feedback on it? I'm interested in seeing if I can make it less spammy and more Wikipedia-appropriate. I'd like to revise, rather than have it abruptly deleted. Jlh0910 (talk) 01:02, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]