Jump to content

User talk:143.85.192.241

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Akohio2000 (talk | contribs) at 14:07, 13 September 2011 (Please stop your disruptive editing). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This shared IP address has received multiple warnings for inappropriate edits. Since different users may be using this IP address, many of these warnings may be stale. Click [show] at far right to see all previous warnings and/or blocks.
The following is a record of previous warnings and/or blocks left for this IP. Please do not modify it.

August 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Anthrax has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. It Is Me Here (talk) 15:19, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Desert Eagle worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Yt95 (talk) 18:21, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

March 2010

Your edits to 1985

Dear 143.85.192.241,
Some of your edits on the page 1985 have been undone by PseudoBot, a robot built to keep the date pages tidy. The problems are:

The person you added doesn't seem to have a Wikipedia page.

If the page exists, check that you've spelled and capitalized the name the same way as the article, and try again. If it doesn't yet exist, read this page carefully before creating it. In particular, you shouldn't create a page about yourself or anyone you know personally. If this bot has got it wrong (as can unfortunately happen), please accept its author's apologies, and (if you would like) leave a message on this talk page with the details, so it can be improved. Please see this page for help. PseudoBot (talk) 03:22, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to 10th Air Support Operations Squadron, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. ~~ Hi878 (Come yell at me!) 19:23, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 10th Air Support Operations Squadron. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. ~~ Hi878 (Come yell at me!) 19:24, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gay village, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Gay village was changed by 143.85.192.241 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2010-06-23T15:08:13+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 15:08, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to AAI RQ-7 Shadow. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. Wikipelli Talk 15:21, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]


You have been temporarily blocked from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:30, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Midget. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SQGibbon (talk) 20:30, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Brandon Flowers, you may be blocked from editing. SQGibbon (talk) 20:31, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

December 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Sheriffs in the United States, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. some jerk on the Internet (talk) 22:02, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page 97th Military Police Battalion (United States) has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#!/pages/Fort-Riley-KS/97th-MP-BN/308776535260=97MP.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 19:47, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bill Lynch. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Worm 13:26, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Bill Lynch. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 13:29, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

Please note that deliberate introduction false information to articles constitutes vandalism, and persistent vandals may be blocked from editing. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 21:21, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Male Unbonding has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. TheMikeWassup doc? 11:57, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to The Deal (Seinfeld). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. DVdm (talk) 13:33, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Dwarfism, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. SQGibbon (talk) 19:10, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Stand In. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SQGibbon (talk) 19:11, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to G. Love has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alan the Roving Ambassador (talk) 19:36, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Book of Joel. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you.  Chzz  ►  14:58, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2011

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Alexandra Guarnaschelli, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Srobak (talk) 18:52, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Bubble wrap. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Pinethicket (talk) 17:13, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

July 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Judas Iscariot has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Socialservice (talk) 18:45, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Judas Iscariot, you may be blocked from editing.  —SMALLJIM  19:40, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Hobbit, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jackfork (talk) 11:44, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Pepper spray worked, and it has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Mark Shaw (talk) 18:23, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


September 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jeff Daniels with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Mato (talk) 13:01, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jeff Daniels with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mato (talk) 13:04, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Jeff Daniels. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Escape Orbit (Talk) 13:16, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Peter Hewitt (film director). Mato (talk) 13:21, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oops.143.85.192.241 (talk) 13:29, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:31, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

143.85.192.241 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

The information I provided was indeed accurate, and I provided contact information to those who are in a position to reinforce what I claim. Additionally, the page for director Peter Hewitt also confirms this information regarding the sequel. Please unblock, as there was absolutely no vandalism whatsoever. 143.85.192.241 (talk) 15:46, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Nope, looks like vandalism to me. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 16:01, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

143.85.192.241 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Decline reason:

Nice try. Consider your talk page access revoked for attempting to trick administrators into unblocking you by modifying other admins comments, and previous unblock requests. Taelus (talk) 16:16, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please stop your disruptive editing

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at User talk:Department of Redundancy Department, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. We realize DoRD is a douche, but you don't need to keep telling everyone that- they already know he is.. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Puffin Let's talk! 20:19, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. Your ability to edit this talk page has also been revoked. If you would like to be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact the unblock mailing list at unblock-en-l@lists.wikimedia.org. GFOLEY FOUR!20:22, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.