User talk:64.26.98.90

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your IP address, 64.26.98.90, is registered to the Maryland State Library Resource Center (operated on behalf of the public libraries of Maryland) and may be shared by multiple users, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Network administrators or other parties wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

May 2005

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. File:Cuss.gif → JarlaxleArtemis 00:15, May 19, 2005 (UTC)

November 2005

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you were just trying to experiment, then use the sandbox instead. Thank you. - N0YKG 22:30, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

January 2006

I can see what you're trying to do, and I will not let you do it. Please stop.--Alhutch 18:01, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

February 2006

1. Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. This warning is in regard to your edits to Psychopathy. If the "not" you added is truly correct please say so on the article's talk page and be prepared to back it up by cited evidence. An anon adding such information looks like vandalism. Dustimagic *\o/* ^{(talk/contribs)} *\o/* 19:30, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. RexNL 23:34, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. RexNL 23:36, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed by an automated bot. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. If you feel you have received this notice in error, please contact the bot owner // Tawkerbot2 00:55, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

March 2006

Please stop removing content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tito xd^{(?!? - help us)} 00:55, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding linkspam to the article Sex-positive feminism. — Ian Moody ^(talk) 16:47, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

April 2006

Some of the material you've added to Open marriage badly needs supporting evidence - there's nothing either in that article or in Benjamin Franklin to support the claim that Franklin had an open marriage, ditto Geronimo. Some of it is outright wrong - Mitterrand was never Prime Minister of France. When adding information to Wikipedia, please check that it is accurate and supported by citations as much as possible. --Calair 00:50, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Free love was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. For frequently asked questions about the bot please click here // Tawkerbot2 15:51, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Sexual revolution was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 17:17, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad that you deleted some of the unsupported entries from Open marriage, but you also deleted a relevant category and a link to the Portuguese version of the article. From the above warnings, I can see that you've been doing the same on other articles. This sort of blanking is vandalism if done deliberately; consider this a warning. --Calair 01:50, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

May 2006

I see you've been trying to add an open marriage category to the page for Cindy Margolis. Do you have a source to cite for this information. I'd like to see one since there is no mention of it in the article. Dismas|^(talk) 17:59, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not re-add Cindy Margolis to the list on open marriage without including verification, either in her own article or as a reference from that list. --Calair 02:34, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with the page Tourette syndrome on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. —xyzzy_n 17:24, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

June 2006

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Isabella d'Este. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. AvB ÷ talk 22:11, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The following refers to your edit to breast: since no evidence was provided for your change re: average breast size I'm assuming that it was vandalism. Adding comments to the edit summary and/or talk help editors confirm that you're making good faith edits. Antonrojo 17:09, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Antonrojo 17:09, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding commercial links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming, and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. Thanks. (ESkog)^(Talk) 17:09, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

August 2006

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to List of fictional United States Democrats. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. 1568 17:42, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

September 2006

Stop messing up the links on Cuckold. If you can't do the links correctly, please don't mess with them. Churchh 20:23, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

December 2006

Please stop trying to draw a link between these two series without a reliable source. The source used to identify the programs that David Simon considers among "the best crime shows" does not make mention of Adam-12. Andrew Levine 01:23, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

January 2007

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Woodrow Wilson, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Imaninjapirate^{talk to me} 22:37, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, 64.26.98.90! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but please note that the link you added in is on my spam blacklist and should not be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an Imageshack or Photobucket image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was genuine spam, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 21:46, 16 January 2007 (UTC) You've been making a lot of edits to the sexual objectification article. However, you frequently don't cite sources for the statements you make and some of them strike me as highly doubtful. In particular, see Talk:Sexual_objectification#Evolutionary_psychology?. Unless these statements can be backed up with real citations, I'm inclined to delete the more doubtful ones.[reply]
Also, you're doing an awful lot of editing from an anonymous IP. While this is allowed on Wikipedia, anonymous edits are generally less highly regarded than ones that somebody is willing to put a username to. Consider signing up for a Wikipedia account. Iamcuriousblue 19:08, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

February 2007

I reverted the strange quote you inserted into the Feminism article & attributed to Naomi Wolf because it was (a) irrelevant to feminism as far as I could tell; (b) even if relevant, certainly not central or helpful or well-known; and (c) uncited and somewhat dubious, and not explained by your edit summary, and not formatted correctly. The link to a random essay on the Internet was also strange, and certainly not a source for the quote, and seems to be a parodic commentary of some sort, which is not really useful where you put it. --lquilter 16:09, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

March 2007

Hey, you accidentally removed some content at Gunpowder. Please don't blank valuable content! Thank you, Gracenotes^T § 21:38, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Silk Road. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. PAK Man 20:15, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

April 2007

Please do not introduce any form of vandalism to the userpages of other users. Thank you.--Guinnog 16:04, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

May 2007

A Request for Mediation to which you are a party was not accepted and has been delisted. You can find more information on the mediation subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom murder.

For the Mediation Committee, ^demon^{[omg plz]}

This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management. If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.

This message delivered: 08:21, 18 May 2007 (UTC).

September 2007

This edit was clear-cut vandalism and a personal attack. You have been blocked for 24 hours. When you return to Wikipedia, please make constructive edits instead of vandalizing articles and attacking people. Johntex\^talk 23:52, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Winter solstice, you will be blocked from editing. --Mschel 19:15, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007

Thank you! - Libertyville | Talk 04:21, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Epic Movie. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Oxymoron⁸³ 18:25, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to English people, you will be blocked from editing. Oxymoron⁸³ 18:25, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, if you would care to offer on opinion on a talk page issue concerning Physical attractiveness, it would be helpful.--Loodog (talk) 04:55, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

If you have access to genuine information on the population of Sierra Leone's districts and major towns, please could you provide a link to your source. If you are using this article to communicate secret information by code, could you please find some other way to pass the information, rather than mis-using Wikipedia. (I would be very interested to know what information you are passing, and to whom. Probably the CIA would be interested, too? - or is it something completely innocent and harmless?) Dbfirs (talk) 10:49, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

While I am not the same individual user as the one who made changes to the populations of various places in Sierra Leone, your reference to "secret information by code" piques my interest: what are you talking about? 64.26.98.90 (talk) 18:48, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It piqued my interest, too. I noticed that a sequence of apparently random changes were being made to population statistics in the Sierra Leone and other related articles in Wikipedia. At first I thought they were just updated figures, but the fluctuations were down as well as up, and usually only the thousands digits were changed. The editors were anonymous, one at your library and the other elsewhere (possibly in Sierra Leone?). I corrected the figures to those of the official census, but they were quickly changed again, then the editors stopped using this section, but continued changing figures elsewhere. Perhaps there is an innocent explanation, but can you think of what it might be? Dbfirs (talk) 10:42, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to [[: articles on Sierra Leone, its districts and towns.]]. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —αἰτίας •discussion• 20:14, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Medical cannabis, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Medical cannabis was changed by 64.26.98.90 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-01-30T23:08:30+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 23:08, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Dissident constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Farosdaughter (talk) 23:32, 30 January 2008 (UTC))[reply]

February 2008

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Xeroderma pigmentosum, you will be blocked from editing. — alex.muller (talk) 20:22, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Hex editor has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Tiddly-Tom 16:55, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to United States Senate, without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Sam42 (talk) 16:56, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Talk:Hex editor. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Abrech (talk) 17:54, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your Articles For Creation Request

Your nomination at Articles for Creation was a success, and Potentially Unwanted Application was created. Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia, and please consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself. Thank you for helping Wikipedia!--Mifter (talk) 21:39, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. 64.26.98.90 (talk) 00:43, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Neon. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Squids'and'Chips 21:09, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hi, the recent edit you made to Sierra Leone has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. The Helpful One ^(Review) 20:45, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008

Your recent edit to Keyshia Cole (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. Please do not add email addresses/phone numbers, Imageshack/Photobucket/Flickr, or related links to non-talk pages if possible. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 22:55, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits to articles, as you did with this edit to Boll weevil, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits constitute vandalism, and will be reverted. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thanks. nneonneo ^talk 22:58, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Keyshia Cole (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. Please do not add email addresses/phone numbers, Imageshack/Photobucket/Flickr, or related links to non-talk pages if possible. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 23:02, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to John F. Kennedy High School (Montgomery County, Maryland), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: John F. Kennedy High School (Montgomery County, Maryland) was changed by 64.26.98.90 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2008-05-28T19:32:07+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 19:32, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to John F. Kennedy High School (Montgomery County, Maryland) constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. J.delanoy ^gabs analyse 19:39, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008

Please stop. If you continue to add defamatory content, as you did to Vince Palamara, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Gamaliel (talk) 18:47, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Writer's Center has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\bblogspot\.com' . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thorougly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creators copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 17:28, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

September 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Template:Cite book/doc has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 16:41, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Hurricane Ike. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - Josh (talk | contribs) 20:49, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Lameness (equine) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Enviroboy^Talk_Cs 22:14, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Ernest Bai Koroma. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Piano non troppo (talk) 18:26, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Charlie Rose, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. JForget 00:38, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008

Your edit to Kailahun introduced false information and has been reverted. Please ensure that you provide evidence for changes to information, especially when references have already been provided. Thank you. Dbfirs 21:23, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that the population estimates at World Gazetteer are calculations from a standard formula. They do not always reflect reality. In particular, the population of Lungi, Sierra Leone, has remained at just over 16,000 for over thirty years. Do you know if there is some reason for a sudden dramatic increase in population? Also, do you happen to know how to correct the wrong co-ordinates given for the town? Dbfirs 20:51, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Moyamba seem to have been games with numbers, or wild guesses. Please leave the official 2004 census figure for the population of the town. Thank you. Dbfirs 22:30, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Second Industrial Revolution has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. —Pill (talk) 17:55, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Sierra Leone, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Sierra Leone was changed by 64.26.98.90 (u) (t) deleting 7650 characters on 2009-03-26T18:59:36+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:59, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Mandatory spending has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Catgut (talk) 21:43, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Sierra Leonean-Lebanese has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 17:56, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see you have started your silly game with numbers again. Why? Dbfirs 18:45, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on the page Biomass (ecology) worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing and its related help page for more information. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 22:53, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Biomass (ecology). Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Tiderolls 22:55, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Biomass. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Alansohn (talk) 23:08, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Kite. Dabomb87 (talk) 23:10, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 1 month from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. -- Menti fisto 18:59, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Sculpture has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Ray^Talk 16:07, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to American Eskimo Dog appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mokoniki (talk • contribs) 19:29, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for Repeated violations of the biographies of living persons policy. It is completely unacceptable to re-insert unsourced, potentially-libelous allegations unless you, yourself have cast-iron, reliable sources at hand to immediately justify such claims. A 'citation needed' tag and a request for others to find proof whilst the claims remain in place is insufficient.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Kurt Shaped Box (talk) 21:59, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You a sheep of sineed? The info I added was & is sourced :
-In 1980 McEntire met Narvel Blackstock when he became her band's steel guitar player.
Another person added the other info. I ask you like I asked sineed, are you helping in citing the info? Nope. What is completely unacceptable is not looking ! What is completely unacceptable is not helping by looking for additonal info. I put the (CN) tag for others who come to the page. (CN) gets others attn so they'll pitch in and help cite. I was looking and researching the information, were you? Have you? 64.26.98.90 (talk) 22:15, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jazmine Sullivan

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Fearless (Jazmine Sullivan album) has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://twitter.com/jsullivanmusic (matching the regex rule \btwitter\.com\b). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 20:31, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

It is her twitter. I am putting the link back. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.26.98.90 (talk) 16:55, 28 September 2009

November 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Cotton gin has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Leuko ^Talk/_Contribs 23:38, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Brad Thor

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your deletions to the Brad Thor Wikipedia page has been reverted. Among the many deletions you made were deletions of links to external sites with radio and television interviews of this page's subject, Brad Thor. You also deleted the descriptions of Brad Thor's novels which the publisher, Simon & Schuster, Inc. provides royalty and copyright usage free in order to explain the content of the novels. In essence, you reverted the entry back to its June 2009 form claiming it violated copyrights which it clearly does not. The page has been reinstated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cervantes in Algiers (talk • contribs) 23:01, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide documentation of the fact that Simon & Schuster has granted copyright permission. 64.26.98.90 (talk) 20:32, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Game (U.S. TV series)

For the second (or third) time, Twitter is not a reliable source which is why I removed it to begin with and stated why in my edit summary. I've no idea why you added it back in this edit while also restoring incorrectly formatted dates (the correct way dates are presented is the way I fix them ie March 15, 2010 or 15 March 2010) and unsourced content. The tvseries.com link is wholly unneeded as it is quoting the original AOL Black Voice source. Please be mindful of the edits you make in the future. There's absolutely no reason to do a wholesale revert because you want to makes changes. Pinkadelica^♣ 00:54, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final time I'm going to ask you to stop adding Twitter links as sources to The Game article and doing wholesale reverts to the article for reasons known only to you. If you want to continue this type of behavior, I'll request that the page be locked. Pinkadelica^♣ 01:02, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have asked you and your various IPs to stop adding unsourced content to this article and now you want to finally communicate (albeit not to me) when I ask for protection? Too little, too late. I explained above why the content needed to be rewritten and why one source was unneeded yet you keep on doing wholesale reverts. I'm tired of attempting to keep the article free of poorly written and unsourced content only to have you add it back simply because you want "your" version in. Either edit by actual Wikipedia policy or expect your edits to be reverted repeatedly. Pinkadelica^♣ 00:56, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Game

Hi. The edits you reverted [1] are indeed sourced. Coby Bell has joined burn notice and will be a recurring character. 64.26.98.90 (talk) 22:53, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted because as I can see your only source is twitter an it's no a reliable source per WP:RS. Tbhotch^Talk ^C. 01:33, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Erin Andrews do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Active Banana (^bananaphone 17:38, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. milonica (talk) 18:53, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at WFED, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Xenon54 (talk) 20:19, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I'm done with wikipedia!

June 2011

This is your last warning; the next time you make personal attacks on other people, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. ḾỊḼʘɴίcả • Talk • _{I DX for fun!} 00:23, 8 June 2011 (UTC) [reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2011

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at User talk:64.26.98.90, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. ḾỊḼʘɴίcả • Talk • _{I DX for fun!} 01:26, 25 July 2011 (UTC) [reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.