Alternatively, you can contact me by shouting really loudly, which may have some success, depending on your proximity to Ahmedabad. You can also e-mail me.
This is an automatic reply: Thanks! I will respond to your talk in a short period. If you are impressed by my works then please leave me a barnstar. And if you have little time then please write a review for me over here. Please do join this cause: Wikipedia:Wikipedia for World Heritage. Thank You for your cooperation and Happy Editing! Yasht101
This table is now up to date again.
It is updated by a tool on the toolserver; it will not work if the toolserver is having problems.
If this chart is showing much more than zero, then the table will be updated slowly or not at all.
Hi Yasht. Happy 1 April. FYI you can't add lyrics under copyright to talk/userpages like you just did. I have reverted the 2 edits. Cheers. --kelapstick(bainuu) 11:51, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I saw on the watchlist. I gess that I got carried away with the crazyness happening today in Wiki. I will take care of it in future. Thanks for being vigilant. Yasht101:)16:34, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yea! Thank you soo much. I did similar things in real life also which ended up in my leg getting semi-fractured. But, my activities on wiki has also cost me ;) See the warning I got due to my childishness (not to forget that I m not an adult) below this barnstar! Yasht101:)16:37, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not use talk pages as forums or chat rooms.
Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you can write practically anything you want. --konditalk/contribs12:23, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
He might be a regular, his edits are good, but on talk pages, he get's out of hand. Perhaps, we ought to take this more seriously to him. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 13:11, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
M extremly sorry for whatever I did today. I wont do it for next 364 days, I gurantee. So, just one question is there in my mind now. Do I still have an eligible level 3 warning? Yasht101:)16:31, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Just kidding, anyways, thanks for the tea. I didnt had tea since long time and this one is strong as I like. Thanks again! Yasht101:)17:14, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
yes it was random, and only 3, the editor before you might have wrongly assessed that does not mean you will do the same, This is called Passing the buck and finding fault with others, he did it, u cherry-picked my edits, etc etc hope you learn --ÐℬigXЯaɣ05:32, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the barnstar. Let us have a cup of coffee for your appreciation and for the general progress we are making. I have been watching your infectious enthusiasm with pleasure. Keep up the good work and coffee will help, I guess. --VasuVR (talk, contribs) 01:26, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Its okay... I really love the shade of your sign, 1 week ago I was also using larger fonts, but rules are rules (They are also meant to break, and I love doing it which ends up into getting a vandal warning ). Anyways, good to see that you changed it Yasht101:)01:39, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I saw on my watchlist. When I A7ed it, there was only written that 'it is a cast in some village' and that didn't made enough sense to be in Wiki. But the article is improved now and notability can be found now.
LOL! Looks like they copied another article. Now they've got a new deletion pending, and this time I'm not going to say anything! :-D - Denimadept (talk) 19:52, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for appreciating me. It is always encouraging.
There are big guns then me also, like Ssriram mt (Who awarded me the barnstar and coordinator of the drive) has 8000+ and User:VasuVR with 8500+ assessments, they are real champions.
There are still 40K articles to be assessed and I'll keep on assessing till it is brought down to 0. At least I can do 10K more odd assessments for India. Yasht101:)05:57, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hippipimp
I really don't think calling him pathetic was helpful, even though he's clearly a difficult editor who doesn't listen (and is now blocked). Dougweller (talk) 12:31, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I had a hunch that they'll be blocked in near future. I saw that they are blocked just now in my watchlist. Actually, their replies were stupid and they just wanted to show that how cool they are, though they were never, and that made me say 'pathetic thing'. Thank you and Happy editing! Yasht101:)13:25, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
wikiproject India
Hello Yasht, I just want suggestions whether this articles belong to wikiproject India or not.
Dear Solomon, thanks for bringing them to my notice. I have assessed both of them within the scope of WP India. Here are the reason for their inclusion in WP IND:
Gerhard Fischer (diplomat) - As stated by User:SupernovaExplosion, He stayed for 5 years in South India so the article is in scope of WP IND. I saw that you added importance parameter with 'Mid' level, but it is not proper so I have reassessed it with 'low'
George Thibaut - Yes, the article is in the scope of WP IND, because in 1875 he was appointed as Professor at the Government Sanskrit College , Varanasi. This is enough to qualify for WP IND.
Well done with this! Although I'm not sure how much help can I do with WP India assessment due to time shortage, I'll definitely try to assess at least 200 WP Pakistan articles to get a barnstar. --SupernovaExplosionTalk10:42, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I have updated your tally for now. But, it will be much better if you keep a note and update yourself as it will be easy for me to review your work. Its okay if you are not willing to do it, as I'll do it for sure, but it will consume more time. Anyways, you are doing great! Yasht10113:55, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Yasht101 I was wondering if you could give me some editing tips and probably recommend me some tools for editing that will make it less tedious.--LoganLopez (talk) 03:11, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Tell me that in what kind of work are you interested in either from the e.g., stated above or do you also have your own desire to do something, so that I can help you? Yasht10103:26, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the references to the software and I think I would like to wikify articles and patrol new pages, as well as maybe make new articles.--LoganLopez (talk) 03:30, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Okay then. Few tips for your future work;
Patrolling new pages - Use this tags if you find a article which is not proper to propose for deletion: Criteria for speedy deletion and if they dont fit in CSD, then you may PROD them and if you have doubt weather the article is good for wiki or not, you may AfD them. NOTE: Use Criteria for speedy deletion tags very care fully after going through the criteria properly mentioned here. If you have any doubt weather the article fits in the criteria or not, then seek my help or leave the article.
Creations of articles - If you dont want to hastily make a bad article, then you can develope the article in sub page and then you can move them to article space. I'll help you in the article that you create and how to create sub page is stated here; Wikipedia:Subpages
Regarding the parameter issues on the WP Pakistan template, these fields were removed (taken out) from the template a long time ago and replaced with these sub-project parameters instead. The documentation has not been updated, that's why this is still there. So just ignore it and use the variables for the sub projects when you tag. If you need me to explain more clearly or don't quite understand what I'm saying, just ping me on my talk page. Regards, Mar4d (talk) 03:23, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Great. If you have time, just remove the entire section on the "variable values for sub-cat" from the tag and assess page, so as to not confuse other people. Cheers, Mar4d (talk) 03:29, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Easter Greetings! :-) Hi, and thanks for the chocolate bunny! Really, i don't mind having two, quite to the contrary! (yes, i am that greedy; but no, it isn't all for me… now i can pass some on to fellow editors! ;-) Also i'm sending you a little postcard so you can pin up on your chocolate fridge. Best of luck!!! benzband (talk) 14:57, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Even I'd like to have mop. I hope you do tireless work as you did in posting the same message on the talk pages of allmost entire wikipedia: live up to people's confidence in me.
BTW, if you go for RfB, then its very hard to get through. So, my only wise advise will be to grant all the rights possible (rollbacker, reviewer, autopatrolled...etc) to the editors who frequently take part in voting. Everything's fair in love n' war. And RfA/RfB are not less then war in Meet the Spartans. You can start with me. I have 160 articles created so grant me autopatrolled
Thanks for doing all the ratings on the articles for India. What you are doing sorts the work so that other people can join and participate. You have improved a lot of the articles I watch by taking your time to do this. Thank you. Blue Rasberry (talk)23:10, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the coffee. I it. It gave me refreshment for start of my day.
WikiProject India
