Jump to content

Thin-film solar cell

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 99.119.131.201 (talk) at 05:28, 4 October 2014 (Tokyo Ohka Kogyo). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Thin film photovoltaic laminates being installed onto a roof.

A thin-film solar cell (TFSC), also called a thin-film photovoltaic cell (TFPV), is a second generation solar cell that is made by depositing one or more thin layers, or thin film (TF) of photovoltaic material on a substrate, such as glass, plastic or metal. Thin-film solar cells are commercially used in several technologies, including cadmium telluride (CdTe), copper indium gallium diselenide (CIGS), and amorphous and other thin-film silicon (a-Si, TF-Si).

Film thickness varies from a few nanometers (nm) to tens of micrometers (µm), much thinner than thin-film's rival technology, the conventional, first-generation crystalline silicon solar cell (c-Si), that uses silicon wafers of up to 200 µm. This allows thin film cells to be flexible, resulting in lower weight, less drag and limited resistance to foot traffic. It is used in building integrated photovoltaics and as semi-transparent, photovoltaic glazing material that can be laminated onto windows. Other commercial applications use rigid thin film solar panels, sandwiched between to panes of glass, used in some of the world's largest photovoltaic power stations.

Thin-film has always been cheaper but less efficient than conventional c-Si technology. However, they significantly improved over the years, and lab cell efficiency for CdTe and CIGS reached almost 20 percent and are on par with polysilicon, the dominant material, currently used in most PV installations.[1]: 23, 24  Despite these facts, market-share of thin-film never reached more than 20 percent in the last two decades and has been declining in recent years to about 9 percent of worldwide photovoltaic production in 2013.[1]: 18, 19 

Other thin-film technologies, that are still in an early stage of ongoing research or with limited commercial availability, are often classified as emerging or third generation photovoltaic cells and include, organic, dye-sensitized, and polymer solar cells, as well as quantum dot, copper zinc tin sulfide, nanocrystal and perovskite solar cells.

History

Market-share of thin-film technologies in terms of annual production since 1990

Thin film cells are well-known since the late 1970s, when solar calculators powerd by a small strip of amorphous silicon appeared on the market.

It is now available in very large modules used in sophisticated building-integrated installations and vehicle charging systems. GBI Research projected thin film production to grow 24% from 2009 levels and to reach 22,214 MW in 2020. "Expectations are that in the long-term, thin-film solar PV technology would surpass dominating conventional solar PV technology, thus enabling the long sought-after grid parity objective."[2][3]

Materials

Cross-section of a thin-film polycrystalline solar cell.

Thin-film technologies reduce the amount of active material in a cell. Most sandwich active material between two panes of glass. Since silicon solar panels only use one pane of glass, thin film panels are approximately twice as heavy as crystalline silicon panels, although they have a smaller ecological impact (determined from life cycle analysis).[4] The majority of film panels have 2-3 percentage points lower conversion efficiencies than crystalline silicon.[5] Cadmium telluride (CdTe), copper indium gallium selenide (CIGS) and amorphous silicon (a-Si) are three thin-film technologies often used for outdoor applications.

Cadmium telluride

Main article: Cadmium telluride photovoltaics

Cadmium telluride (CdTe) is the predominant thin film technology. With about 5 percent of worldwide PV production, it accounts for more than half of the thin film market. The cell's lab efficiency has also increased significantly in recent years and is on a par with CIGS thin film and close to the efficiency of multi-crystalline silicon as of 2013.[1]: 24–25  Also, CdTe has the lowest Energy payback time of all mass-produced PV technologies, and can be as short as eight months in favorable locations.[1]: 31  A prominent manufacturer is the US-company First Solar based in Tempe, Arizona, that produces CdTe-panels with an efficiency of about 14 percent at a reported cost of $0.59 per watt.[6]

Although the toxicity of cadmium may not be that much of an issue and environmental concerns completely resolved with the recycling of CdTe modules at the end of their life time,[7] there are still uncertainties[8] and the public opinion is skeptical towards this technology.[9][10] The usage of rare materials may also be a critical issue to the economic viability of CdTe thin film technology. The abundance of tellurium—of which telluride is the anionic form—is comparable to that of platinum in the earth's crust and it contributes significantly to the module's cost.[11]

Copper indium gallium selenide

Possible combinations of Group-(XI, XIII, XVI) elements in the periodic table that yield a compound showing photovoltaic effect: Cu, Ag, Au — Al, Ga, In — S, Se, Te.
Main article: Copper indium gallium selenide solar cell

A copper indium gallium selenide solar cell or CIGS cell uses an absorber made of copper, indium, gallium, selenide (CIGS), while gallium-free variants of the semmiconductor material are abbreviated CIS. It is one of three mainstream thin-film technologies, the other two being cadmium telluride and amorphous silicon, with a lab-efficiency above 20 percent and a share of 2 percent in the overall PV market in 2013.[12] A prominent manufacturer of cylindrical CIGS-panels was the now-bankrupt company Solyndra in Fremont, California. Traditional methods of fabrication involve vacuum processes including co-evaporation and sputtering. In 2008, IBM and Tokyo Ohka Kogyo Co., Ltd. (TOK) announced they had developed a new, non-vacuum, solution-based manufacturing process for CIGS cells and are aiming for efficiencies of 15% and beyond.[13]

As of September 2014, current conversion efficiency record for a CIGS cell in the laboratory stands at 21.7%.[14]

Amorphous silicon

Main article: Amorphous silicon

Amorphous silicon (a-Si) is a non-crystalline, allotropic form of silicon and the most well-developed thin film technology to-date. Thin-film silicon is an alternative to conventional wafer (or bulk) crystalline silicon. While chalcogenide-based CdTe and CIS thin films cells have been developed in the lab with great success, there is still industry interest in silicon-based thin film cells. Silicon-based devices exhibit fewer problems than their CdTe and CIS counterparts such as toxicity and humidity issues with CdTe cells and low manufacturing yields of CIS due to material complexity. Additionally, due to political resistance to the use non-"green" materials in solar energy production, there is no stigma in the use of standard silicon.

Three major silicon-based module designs dominate:

  • amorphous silicon cells
  • amorphous / microcrystalline tandem cells
  • thin-film polycrystalline silicon on glass.[15]

Amorphous silicon cells

This type of thin-film cell is mostly fabricated by a technique called plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition. It uses a gaseous mixture of silane (SiH4) and hydrogen to deposit a very thin layer of only 1 micrometre (µm) of silicon on a substrate, such as glass, plastic or metal, that has already been coated with a layer of transparent conducting oxide. Other methods used to deposit amorphous silicon on a substrate include sputtering and hot wire techniques.[16]

a-Si is attractive as a solar cell material because it's an abundant, non-toxic material. It requires a low processing temperature and enables a scaleable production upon a flexible, low-cost substrate with little silicon material required. Due to its bandgap of 1.7 eV, amorphous silicon also absorbes a very broad range of the light spectrum, that includes infrared and even some ultraviolet and performs very well at weak light. This allows the cell to generate power in the early morning, or late afternoon and on cloudy and rainy days, contrary to crystalline silicon cells, that are significantly less efficient when exposed at diffuse and indirect daylight.[17]

However, the efficiency of an a-Si cell suffers a significant drop of about 10 to 30 percent during the first six months of operation. This is called the Staebler-Wronski effect (SWE) – a typical loss in electrical output due to changes in photoconductivity and dark conductivity caused by prolonged exposure to sunlight. Although this degradation is perfectly reversible upon annealing at or above 150 °C, conventional c-Si solar cells do not exhibit this effect in the first place.

Its basic electronic structure is the p-i-n junction. The amorphous structure of a-Si implies high inherent disorder and dangling bonds, making it a bad conductor for charge carriers. These dangling bonds act as recombination centers that severely reduce carrier lifetime and pin the Fermi level so that doping the material to n- or p- type is not possible. A p-i-n structure is usually used, as opposed to an n-i-p structure. This is because the mobility of electrons in a-Si:H is roughly 1 or 2 orders of magnitude larger than that of holes, and thus the collection rate of electrons moving from the n- to p-type contact is better than holes moving from p- to n-type contact. Therefore, the p-type layer should be placed at the top where the light intensity is stronger, so that the majority of the charge carriers crossing the junction are electrons.[18]

Tandem-cell using a-Si/μc-Si

A layer of amorphous silicon can be combined with layers of other allotropic forms of silicon to produce a multijunction photovoltaic cell. When only two layers (two p-n junctions) are combined, it is called a tandem-cell. By stacking these layers on top of one other, a broader range of the light spectra is absorbed, improving the cell's overall efficiency.

In micromorphous silicon, a layer of a-Si is combined with a layer of nanocrystalline silicon creating a tandem cell. The top amorphous silicon layer absorbs the visible light, leaving the infrared part to the bottom nanocrystalline silicon layer.

Because all layers are made of silicon, they can be manufactured using PECVD. The band gap of a-Si is 1.7 eV and that of c-Si is 1.1 eV. The c-Si layer can absorb red and infrared light. The best efficiency can be achieved at transition between a-Si and c-Si. As nanocrystalline silicon (nc-Si) has about the same bandgap as c-Si, nc-Si can replace c-Si.[19]

Tandem-cell using a-Si/pc-Si

Amorphous silicon can also be combined with protocrystalline silicon (pc-Si) into a tandem-cell. Protocrystalline silicon with a low volume fraction of nanocrystalline silicon is optimal for high open-circuit voltage.[20] These types of silicon present dangling and twisted bonds, which results in deep defects (energy levels in the bandgap) as well as deformation of the valence and conduction bands (band tails).

Polycrystalline silicon on glass

A new attempt to fuse the advantages of bulk silicon with those of thin-film devices is thin film polycrystalline silicon on glass. These modules are produced by depositing an antireflection coating and doped silicon onto textured glass substrates using plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD). The texture in the glass enhances the efficiency of the cell by approximately 3% by reducing the amount of incident light reflecting from the solar cell and trapping light inside the solar cell. The silicon film is crystallized by an annealing step, temperatures of 400-600 Celsius, resulting in polycrystalline silicon.

These new devices show energy conversion efficiencies of 8% and high manufacturing yields of >90%. Crystalline silicon on glass (CSG), where the polycrystalline silicon is 1-2 micrometres, is noted for its stability and durability; the use of thin film techniques also contributes to a cost savings over bulk photovoltaics. These modules do not require the presence of a transparent conducting oxide layer. This simplifies the production process twofold; not only can this step be skipped, but the absence of this layer makes the process of constructing a contact scheme much simpler. Both of these simplifications further reduce the cost of production. Despite the numerous advantages over alternative design, production cost estimations on a per unit area basis show that these devices are comparable in cost to single-junction amorphous thin film cells.[15]

Gallium arsenide thin film cells

The semiconductor material Gallium arsenide (GaAs) is also used for single-crystalline thin film solar cells. Although GaAs cells are very expensive, they hold the world record for the highest-efficiency, single-junction solar cell at 28.8%.[21] GaAs is more commonly used in multijunction photovoltaic cells for solar panels on spacecrafts, as the industry favours efficiency over cost for space-based solar power (InGaP/(In)GaAs/Ge cells). They are also used in concentrated photovoltaics (CPV, HCPV), an emerging technology best suited for locations that receive much sunlight, using lenses to focus sunlight on a much smaller, thus less expensive GaAs concentrator solar cell.

Emerging photovoltaics

Further information: Third generation solar cell

The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) classifies a number of thin-film technologies as emerging photovoltaics—most of them have not yet been commercially applied and are still in the research or development phase. Many use organic materials, often organometallic compounds as well as inorganic substances. Despite the fact that their efficiencies had been low and the stability of the absorber material was often too short for commercial applications, there is a lot of research invested into these technologies as they promise to achieve the goal of producing low-cost, high-efficient solar cells.

Emerging photovoltaics, often called third generation photovoltaic cells, include:

Especially the achivements in the research of perovskites have received tremendous attention in the public, as their research efficiencies soared in recent years to almost 20 percent. They also offer a wide spectrum of low-cost applications.[22][23][24]

Efficiencies

Solar cell efficiencies of various cell technologies as tracked by NREL [25]

Since the invention of the first modern silicon solar cell in 1954, incremental improvements have resulted in modules capable of converting 12 to 18 percent of solar radiation into electricity.[26]

Cells made from these materials tend to be less efficient than bulk silicon, but are less expensive to produce. Their quantum efficiency is also lower due to reduced number of collected charge carriers per incident photon.

The performance and potential of thin-film materials are high, reaching cell efficiencies of 12–20%; prototype module efficiencies of 7–13%; and production modules in the range of 9%.[27] The thin film cell prototype with the best efficiency yields 20.4% (First Solar), comparable to the best conventional solar cell prototype efficiency of 25.6% from Panasonic.[28][29]

NREL once predicted that costs would drop below $100/m2 in volume production, and could later fall below $50/m2.[30]

Absorption

Multiple techniques have been employed to increase the amount of light that enters the cell and reduce the amount that escapes without absorption. The most obvious technique is to minimizing the top contact coverage of the cell surface, reducing the area that blocks light from reaching the cell.

The weakly absorbed long wavelength light can be obliquely coupled into silicon and traverses the film several times to enhance absorption.[31][32]

Anti-reflective coatings can create destructive interference within the cell. This can be done by modulating the refractive index of the surface coating. Destructive interference eliminates the reflective wave and thus all incident light enters the cell.

Surface texturing is another option for increasing absorption, but increases costs. By applying a texture to the active material's surface, the reflected light can be refracted into striking the surface again, thus reducing reflectance. A textured backreflector can prevent light from escaping through the rear of the cell.

Thermal processing techniques can significantly enhance the crystal quality of the silicon and thereby increase efficiency.[33]

Further advancement into geometric considerations can exploit nanomaterial dimensionality. Large, parallel nanowire arrays enable long absorption lengths along the length of the wire while maintaining short minority carrier diffusion lengths along the radial direction. Adding nanoparticles between the nanowires allows conduction. The natural geometry of these arrays forms a textured surface that traps more light.

Production, cost and market

Global PV market by technology in 2013.[34]: 18, 19 

  multi-Si (54.9%)
  mono-Si (36.0%)
  CdTe (5.1%)
  a-Si (2.0%)
  CIGS (2.0%)

With the advances in conventional crystalline silicon (c-Si) technology in recent years, and the falling cost of the polysilicon, that followed after a period of severe shortage of silicon raw material, pressure increased on manufacturers of commercial thin-film technologies, including amorphous thin-film silicon (a-Si), cadmium telluride (CdTe), and copper indium gallium diselenide (CIGS), leading to the bankruptcy of several companies.[35] As of 2013, thin-film manufacturers continue to face price competition from Chinese refiners of silicon and manufacturers of conventional c-Si solar panels. Some companies together with their patents were sold to Chinese firms below cost.[36]

Market-share

In 2013 thin-film technologies accounted for about 9 percent of worldwide deployment, while 91 percent was hold by crystalline silicon (mono-Si and multi-Si). With 5 percent on the overall market, CdTe holds more than half of the thin-film market, leaving 2 percent to each, CIGS and amorphous silicon.[1]: 18–19 

CIGS

See also: List of CIGS companies

Several prominent manufacturers couldn't stand the pressure caused by advances in conventional c-Si technology of recent years. The company Solyndra ceased all business activity and filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 2011, and Nanosolar, also a CIGS manufacturer, closed its doors in 2013. Allthough both companies produced CIGS solar cells, it has been pointed out, that the failure was not due to the technology but rather because of the companies themselves, useing a flawed architecture, such as, for example, Solyndra's cylindrical substrates.[37]

CdTe

The company First Solar, a leading manufacturer of CdTe, has been building several of the world's largest solar power stations, such as the Desert Sunlight Solar Farm and Topaz Solar Farm, both in the Californian desert with a staggering 550 MW capacity each, as well as the 102 MW Nyngan Solar Plant in Australia, the largest PV power station in the Southern Hemnisphere, expected to be completed in 2015.[38]

In 2011, GE announced plans to spend $600 million on a new CdTe solar cell plant and enter this market, [39] and in 2013, First Solar bought GE's CdTe thin-film intellectual property portfolio and formed a business partnership.[40]

In 2012 Abound Solar, a manufacturer of cadmium telluride modules, went bankrupt.[41]

TF-Silicon (a-Si)

In August 2013, the spot market price of thin-film a-Si and a-Si/µ-Si dropped to €0.36 and €0.46, respectively[42] (about $0.50 and $0.60) per watt.[43] A-Si/µ-Si is a micromorphous tandem cell using a microcrystalline silicon layer above the amorphous layer.[44]

Awards

Thin-film photovoltaic cells were included in Time Magazine's Best Inventions of 2008.[45]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c d e "Photovoltaics Report". Fraunhofer ISE. 28 July 2014. Archived from the original (PDF) on 31 August 2014. Retrieved 31 August 2014.
  2. ^ Renewable Energy Magazine[dead link]
  3. ^ GBI Research (2011). "Thin Film Photovoltaic PV Cells Market Analysis to 2020 CIGS Copper Indium Gallium Diselenide to Emerge as the Major Technology by 2020". gbiresearch.com. Retrieved 29 January 2011.
  4. ^ Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1115/SED2002-1051, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with |doi=10.1115/SED2002-1051 instead.
  5. ^ Datasheets of the market leaders: First Solar for thin film, Suntech and SunPower for crystalline silicon
  6. ^ CleanTechnica.com First Solar Reports Largest Quarterly Decline In CdTe Module Cost Per-Watt Since 2007, 7 November 2013
  7. ^ Fthenakis, Vasilis M. (2004). "Life cycle impact analysis of cadmium in CdTe PV production". Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 8 (4): 303–334. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2003.12.001. Archived from the original (PDF) on 23 September 2014. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  8. ^ Werner, Jürgen H. (2 November 2011). "TOXIC SUBSTANCES IN PHOTOVOLTAIC MODULES". postfreemarket.net. Institute of Photovoltaics, University of Stuttgart, Germany - The 21st International Photovoltaic Science and Engineering Conference 2011 Fukuoka, Japan. p. 2. Archived from the original (PDF) on 23 September 2014. Retrieved 23 September 2014. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  9. ^ Herman Trabish, The Lowdown on the Safety of First Solar's CdTe Thin Film, greentechmedia.com March 19, 2012
  10. ^ Robert Mullins, Cadmium: The Dark Side of Thin-Film?, September 25, 2008
  11. ^ Supply Constraints Analysis, National Renewable Energy Laboratory
  12. ^ Fraunhofer ISE, Photovoltaics report, July 2014, p. 19, http://www.ise.fraunhofer.de/en/downloads-englisch/pdf-files-englisch/photovoltaics-report-slides.pdf
  13. ^ IBM pressrelease IBM and Tokyo Ohka Kogyo Turn Up Watts on Solar Energy Production, 16 June 2008
  14. ^ CleanTechnica.com New CIGS Solar Cell Record: 21.7% CIGS Cell Conversion Efficiency Achieved At ZSW, 27 September 2014
  15. ^ a b Green, M. A. (2003), "Crystalline and thin-film silicon solar cells: state of the art and future potential", Solar Energy, 74 (3): 181–192, doi:10.1016/S0038-092X(03)00187-7.
  16. ^ Photovoltaics. Engineering.Com (9 July 2007). Retrieved on 19 January 2011.
  17. ^ Sahay, Amit; Sethi, V.K.; Tiwari, A.C. (7 July 2013). "A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ATTRIBUTES OF THIN FILM AND CRYSTALLINE PHOTOVOLTAIC CELLS". http://assets.fiercemarkets.com/. VSRD International Journal of Mechanical, Civil, Automobile and Production Engineering, Vol. 3 No. 7 July 2013 / 267 e-ISSN : 2249-8303, p-ISSN : 2319-2208 © VSRD International Journals: www.vsrdjournals.com. pp. 3–4. Archived from the original (PDF) on 20 September 2014. Retrieved 20 September 2014. {{cite web}}: External link in |website= (help)
  18. ^ "Amorphes Silizium für Solarzellen" (PDF) (in German).
  19. ^ J. M. Pearce, N. Podraza, R. W. Collins, M.M. Al-Jassim, K.M. Jones, J. Deng, and C. R. Wronski (2007). "Optimization of Open-Circuit Voltage in Amorphous Silicon Solar Cells with Mixed Phase (Amorphous + Nanocrystalline) p-Type Contacts of Low Nanocrystalline Content" (PDF). Journal of Applied Physics. 101: 114301. doi:10.1063/1.2714507.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  20. ^ Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1063/1.2714507, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with |doi=10.1063/1.2714507 instead.
  21. ^ Yablonovitch, Eli; Miller, Owen D.; Kurtz, S. R. (2012). "2012 38th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference": 001556. doi:10.1109/PVSC.2012.6317891. ISBN 978-1-4673-0066-7. {{cite journal}}: |chapter= ignored (help); Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  22. ^ http://www.phys.org A new stable and cost-cutting type of perovskite solar cell, 17 July 2014
  23. ^ http://www.rsc.org/chemistryworld Spray-deposition steers perovskite solar cells towards commercialisation, 29 July 2014
  24. ^ http://www.ossila.com Perovskite Solar Cells
  25. ^ "NREL: Best PV research cell efficiencies". Retrieved 25 November 2012.
  26. ^ Steve Heckeroth (February–March 2010). "The Promise of Thin-Film Solar". Mother Earth News. Retrieved 2010-03-23.
  27. ^ Utility-Scale Thin-Film: Three New Plants in Germany Total Almost 50 MW
  28. ^ Yet Another Solar Cell Efficiency Record For First Solar
  29. ^ Panasonic HIT Solar Cell Sets World Efficiency Record
  30. ^ "NREL: Photovoltaics Research - Thin Film Photovoltaic Partnership Project". Nrel.gov. 2012-06-28. Retrieved 2014-06-26.
  31. ^ Widenborg, Per I.; Aberle, Armin G. (2007). "Polycrystalline Silicon Thin-Film Solar Cells on AIT-Textured Glass Superstrates" (PDF). Advances in OptoElectronics. 2007: 1. doi:10.1155/2007/24584.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  32. ^ [1]
  33. ^ Terry, Mason L.; Straub, Axel; Inns, Daniel; Song, Dengyuan; Aberle, Armin G. (2005). "Large open-circuit voltage improvement by rapid thermal annealing of evaporated solid-phase-crystallized thin-film silicon solar cells on glass". Applied Physics Letters. 86 (17): 172108. Bibcode:2005ApPhL..86q2108T. doi:10.1063/1.1921352.
  34. ^ "Photovoltaics Report". Fraunhofer ISE. 28 July 2014. Archived from the original (PDF) on 31 August 2014. Retrieved 31 August 2014.
  35. ^ RenewableEnergyWorld.com How thin film solar fares vs crystalline silicon, 3 Januar 2011
  36. ^ Diane Cardwell; Keith Bradsher (January 9, 2013). "Chinese Firm Buys U.S. Solar Start-Up". The New York Times. Retrieved January 10, 2013.
  37. ^ Andorka, Frank (2014-01-08). "CIGS Solar Cells, Simplified". http://www.solarpowerworldonline.com/. Solar Power World. Archived from the original on 16 August 2014. Retrieved 16 August 2014. {{cite web}}: External link in |website= (help); Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  38. ^ AGL Energy Online Nyngan Solar Plant, 2014
  39. ^ Peralta, Eyder. (2011-04-07) GE Unveils Plans To Build Largest Solar Panel Factory In U.S. : The Two-Way. NPR. Retrieved on 2011-05-05.
  40. ^ PVTECH.org First Solar buys GE’s CdTe thin-film IP and forms business partnership, 6 August 2013
  41. ^ Raabe, Steve; Jaffe, Mark (November 4, 2012). "Bankrupt Abound Solar of Colo. lives on as political football". Denver Post.
  42. ^ "Service | PVX spot market price index solar PV modules - SolarServer". Solarserver.com. 2014-06-20. Archived from the original on 17 September 2014. Retrieved 2014-09-17.
  43. ^ (Mid-market rates: 2013-08-31 21:20 UTC 1 EUR = 1.32235 USD)
  44. ^ "Photovoltaics: Thin-film technology about to make its breakthrough". Solar server. 2008-08-07.
  45. ^ "25. Thin-Film Solar Panels". Time. 2008-10-29. TIME's Best Inventions of 2008. Retrieved 2010-05-25.

Sources

  • Grama, S. “A Survey of Thin-Film Solar Photovoltaic Industry & Technologies.” Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2008.
  • Green, Martin A. “Consolidation of thin-film photovoltaic technology: the coming decade of opportunity.” Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications 14, no. 5 (2006): 383–392.
  • Green, M. A. “Recent developments in photovoltaics.” Solar Energy 76, no. 1-3 (2004): 3–8.
  • Beaucarne, Guy. “Silicon Thin-Film Solar Cells.” Advances in OptoElectronics 2007 (August 2007): 12.
  • Ullal, H. S., and B. von Roedern. “Thin Film CIGS and CdTe Photovoltaic Technologies: Commercialization, Critical Issues, and Applications; Preprint” (2007).
  • Hegedus, S. “Thin film solar modules: the low cost, high throughput and versatile alternative to Si wafers.” Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications 14, no. 5 (2006): 393–411.
  • Poortmans, J., and V. Arkhipov. Thin Film Solar Cells: Fabrication, Characterization and Applications. Wiley, 2006.
  • Wronski, C.R., B. Von Roedern, and A. Kolodziej. “Thin-film Si:H-based solar cells.” Vacuum 82, no. 10 (June 3, 2008): 1145–1150.
  • Chopra, K. L., P. D. Paulson, and V. Dutta. “Thin-film solar cells: an overview.” Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications 12, no. 2-3 (2004): 69–92.
  • Hamakawa, Y. Thin-Film Solar Cells: Next Generation Photovoltaics and Its Applications. Springer, 2004.
  • Green, Martin. “Thin-film solar cells: review of materials, technologies and commercial status.” Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics 18 (October 1, 2007): 15–19.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thin-film_solar_cell&oldid=628171202"