Quantum dot solar cell

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Spin-cast quantum dot solar cell built by the Sargent Group at the University of Toronto. The metal disks on the front surface are the electrical connections to the layers below.

Quantum dot solar cells are an emerging field in solar cell research that uses quantum dots as the absorbing photovoltaic material, as opposed to better-known bulk materials such as silicon, copper indium gallium selenide (CIGS) or CdTe. Quantum dots have bandgaps that are tunable across a wide range of energy levels by changing the quantum dot size. This is in contrast to bulk materials, where the bandgap is fixed by the choice of material composition. This property makes quantum dots attractive for multi-junction solar cells, where a variety of different bandgap materials are used to improve efficiency by harvesting select portions of the solar spectrum.

The potential benefits of the quantum dot approach has led to widespread research in the field. Early examples used costly molecular beam epitaxy processes, but alternative inexpensive fabrication methods have been developed. These attempts rely on quantum dot synthesis using wet chemistry (colloidal quantum dots – CQDs) and subsequent solution processing of quantum dots. Using this approach, concentrated nanoparticle solutions are made stable by long hydrocarbon ligands which keep the nanocrystals suspended in solution. When a quantum dot solid is ready to be made, these solutions are cast down and the long stabilizing ligands are replaced with short-chain crosslinkers. Recent efforts have used chemical engineering at the nanocrystal surface to better passivated the nanocrystals and reduce detrimental trap states which would curtail device performance by means of carrier recombination. These cells result in an efficiency of 7.0%[1] which is among the highest observed for QDSCs and, although quite low compared to that of commercial bulk silicon cells (about 17%), it has a potential for improvement beyond silicon cells by means of hot carrier extraction and efficient multiple exciton generation.

Background[edit]

Basic solar cell concepts[edit]

In a conventional solar cell, light is absorbed by a semiconductor producing an electron-hole (e-h) pair; the electron hole pair may be bound and is referred to as an exciton. This pair is separated by an internal electric field (present in p-n junctions or Schottcky diodes) and the resulting flow of electrons and holes creates electric current. The internal electric field is created by doping one part of semiconductor interface with atoms which act as electron donors (n-type doping) and another with electron acceptors (p-type doping) that results in a p-n junction. Generation of an e-h pair requires that the photons of light have energy exceeding the bandgap of the material. Effectively, photons with lower energies than the bandgap do not get absorbed (depends on whether the semiconductor is direct or indirect, and the exact absorption coefficients), while higher energy photons are relatively inefficient as an energetic e-h pair can quickly (within about 10−13 s) thermalize to the band edges, thus reducing the energy of the extracted carriers. The former limitation results in a lower current scenario, while the thermalization reduces the maximum achievable cell voltage. As a result, all semiconductor solar cells suffer a trade-off between voltage and current (which can be in part alleviated by using multiple junction implementations). The detailed balance calculation shows that this efficiency can not exceed 31% if one uses a single material for a solar cell.[2]

Numerical analysis shows that the 31% efficiency is achieved when the solar cell material has a bandgap of 1.3-1.4 eV, corresponding to light in the near infrared. This band gap is close to that of silicon (1.1 eV), one of the many reasons this material dominates solar cell production. However, silicon's maximum efficiency is maximized at about 29%. It is possible to greatly improve on a single-junction cell by stacking cells with different bandgaps on top of each other – termed the "tandem cell" or "multi-junction" approach. The same basic analysis shows that a two layer cell should have one layer tuned to 1.64 eV and the other at 0.94 eV, with a theoretical performance of 44%. A three-layer cell should be tuned to 1.83, 1.16 and 0.71 eV, with an efficiency of 48%. An "infinity-layer" cell would have a theoretical efficiency of 86%, with other thermodynamic loss mechanisms accounting for the rest.[3]

Traditional (crystalline) silicon preparation methods do not lend themselves to this approach due to lack of bandgap tunability. There has been some progress using thin-films of amorphous silicon, which due to a relaxed requirement in crystal momentum preservation can achieve direct bandgaps and intermixing of carbon can tune the bandgap, but other issues have prevented these from matching the performance of traditional cells.[4] Most tandem-cell structures are based on higher performance semiconductors, notably gallium arsenide (GaAs). Three-layer InGaAs/GaAs/InGaP cells (bandgaps 1.89/1.42/0.94 eV) hold the efficiency record of 42.3% for experimental examples.[5]

Quantum dots[edit]

Quantum dots are particles of semiconductor material that have been reduced below the size of the Exciton Bohr-radius, and due to quantum mechanics considerations, the electron energies that can exist within them become finite, much alike energies in an atom. In fact, quantum dots have often been referred to as "artificial atoms". These energy levels are tuneable by changing the size of quantum dots, and in turn define the bandgap. The dots can be grown over a range of sizes, allowing them to be tuned across a wide variety of bandgaps without changing the underlying material or construction techniques.[6] In typical preparations employing wet chemistry, the tuning is accomplished by varying the duration or temperature of synthesis.

The ability to tune the bandgap is what makes quantum dots desirable for solar cell use. In this respect, they can help replace existing expensive GaAs tandem cells, and in theory can achieve efficiencies on the same order. As for single junction implementations, lead sulfide (PbS) CQDs have bandgaps that can be tuned into the far infrared, energy levels that are typically difficult to achieve with traditional semiconductor materials. Half of all the solar energy reaching the Earth is in the infrared, most of it in the near infrared region. With a quantum dot solar cell, IR-sensitive materials are just as easy to use as any other, opening the possibility of capturing much more energy cost-effectively.[7]

Moreover, CQDs benefit from facile synthesis and preparation. When suspended in a colloidal liquid form they can be easily handled throughout production, with the most complex equipment needed being a fumehood. The CQDs are typically synthesized in small batches, but can be scaled up readily to be mass-produced. The dots can be distributed on a substrate by spin coating, either by hand or in an easily automated process. In large-scale production this technique could be replaced by spray-on or roll-printing systems, which dramatically reduces module construction costs.

Current research[edit]

Early concepts[edit]

The idea of using quantum dots as a path to high efficiency was first noted by Burnham and Duggan in 1990.[8] At the time, the science of quantum dots, or "wells" as they were known, was in its infancy and early production examples were just becoming available.

DSSC efforts[edit]

Another modern cell design is the dye-sensitized solar cell, or DSSC. DSSCs use a sponge-like layer of TiO2 as the semiconductor valve as well as a mechanical support structure. During construction, the sponge is filled with an organic dye, typically ruthenium-polypyridine, which injects electrons into the titanium dioxide upon photoexcitation.[9] This dye is relatively expensive, and ruthenium is a rare metal.[10] Another drawback of the design is that it requires direct contact between the dye molecules suspended in the film and the rear electrode to return electrons to the dye. In most designs, this is handled by a liquid electrolyte between the two, making the design susceptible to leakage currents if the electrolyte makes direct contact with the titanium dioxide. Finally, in order to efficiently harvest all the solar lgiht, the front electrode has to be transparent. Such an electrode is usually made of indium tin oxide (ITO), which contains expensive indium metal. Recently, other conductive doped oxide materials, such as fluorite tin oxide, have been proposed to alleviate this issue.

Using quantum dots as an alternative to the molecular dyes was considered from the earliest days of DSSC research. The ability to tune the bandgap means the designer can select a wider variety materials for other portions of the cell. The collaborating groups from the University of Toronto and École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne developed a new design based on a rear electrode directly in contact with a film of quantum dots, eliminating the electrolyte and forming a depleted heterojunction. To date these cells have reached 7.0% certified efficiency, better than the best solid-state DSSC devices, but still below those based on liquid electrolytes.[1]

Multi-junction efforts[edit]

During this period, other teams were working with nanocrystals of other semiconductors, notably cadmium telluride (CdTe). A colloidal suspension of these crystals is spin-cast onto a suitable substrate, often a thin glass slide, potted in a conductive polymer. These did not use quantum dots, but had a number of features in common with them. In particular, the method of casting a thin layer of crystals would work just as well as with quantum dots, and the use of a thin film conductor would both be applicable with few changes. In low scale production quantum dots are more expensive to form than mass-producing of nanocrystals, but the crystals are based on rare metals that are already subject to major price swings, whereas a wide variety of materials can be used to make suitable dots. As well, Cadmium and Tellurium are highly toxic materials.

Experiments using a variety of CQDs materials with spin-casting techniques started at the Sargent Group in the mid-2000s. In one noteworthy experiment, the group used lead sulfide as an infrared-sensitive electron donor to produce the highest-efficiency IR solar cells ever built. The true advantage of this technique, however, is that it yields the prospect of combining the quantum dots inherent tunability with a simple manufacturing process to allow the construction of "tandem" cells of greatly reduced cost. The cells use a rear layer of gold as an electrode, but recent experiments have shown that nickel works just as well.[11] This would greatly reduce the cost of the system in large-scale production.

Hot-carrier capture[edit]

Another way to improve efficiency is to capture the extra energy in the electron when emitted from a single-bandgap material. In traditional materials like silicon, the distance from the emission site to the electrode where they are harvested is too far to allow this to occur; the electron will undergo many interactions with the crystal materials and lattice, giving up this extra energy as heat. There was great hope in the 1980s that thin films of silicon or other materials would avoid this, and capture some of this extra energy. These films are amorphous, and in practice the defects that are inherent to these materials overwhelmed this advantage. Modern thin-film cells are generally less efficient than traditional silicon.

In the case of quantum dots, or other nanostructured donors, it is possible to cast cells as uniform films that avoid the problems with defects.[12] These would still be subject to other issues inherent to quantum dots in general, notably resistivity issues and heat retention. It appears there has been little active development along these lines.

Multiple exciton generation[edit]

In 2004, Los Alamos National Laboratory reported for the first time spectroscopic evidence that several excitons could be efficiently generated upon absorption of a single, energetic photon in a quantum dot.[13][14][15] This opens up the possibility of a different approach to the same problems that tandem cells attempt to solve, capturing more of the energy in highly energetic visible photons in sunlight. In this approach, known as "carrier multiplication" (CM) or "multiple exciton generation" (MEG), the quantum dot is tuned to release multiple electron-hole pairs at a lower energy instead of just one high-energy electron-hole pair. This increases the cell efficiency through increased photocurrent. The dots in LANL's example were made from lead selenide.

In 2010, a team at the University of Wyoming demonstrated similar performance using cells based on the DCCS design. In their examples, PbS quantum dots demonstrated two-electron ejection when the incoming photons had about three times the base bandgap energy.[16]

NREL maintains an active research effort developing silicon-based quantum dots.[17] In order to become cost effective, any new solar cell design will have to compete with the existing silicon industry. Silicon is plentiful and inexpensive in bulk form, it is only the processing that makes it expensive. If quantum dots with suitable properties can be made from silicon, they can compete on a cost basis. In 2007, NREL demonstrated that MEG occurs in silicon quantum dots as well as in the PbS dots.[18]

Other issues[edit]

Although research is still at a pre-commercialization stage, in the future quantum dot based photovoltaics may offer advantages such as mechanical flexibility (as in quantum dot-polymer composite photovoltaics[19]) as well as low cost, clean power generation[20] and an efficiency of 65%.[21]

Other third generation solar cells[edit]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b Ip, Alexander H.; Thon, Susanna M.; Hoogland, Sjoerd; Voznyy, Oleksandr; Zhitomirsky, David; Debnath, Ratan; Levina, Larissa; Rollny, Lisa R.; Carey, Graham H.; Fischer, Armin; Kemp, Kyle W.; Kramer, Illan J.; Ning, Zhijun; Labelle, André J.; Chou, Kang Wei; Amassian, Aram; Sargent, Edward H. (2012). "Hybrid passivated colloidal quantum dot solids". Nature Nanotechnology 7: 577–582. Bibcode:2012NatNa...7..577I. doi:10.1038/nnano.2012.127. 
  2. ^ Shockley, William; Queisser, Hans J. (1961). "Detailed Balance Limit of Efficiency of p-n Junction Solar Cells". Journal of Applied Physics 32: 510. Bibcode:1961JAP....32..510S. doi:10.1063/1.1736034. 
  3. ^ Brown, A; Green, M (2002). "Detailed balance limit for the series constrained two terminal tandem solar cell". Physica E 14: 96. Bibcode:2002PhyE...14...96B. doi:10.1016/S1386-9477(02)00364-8. 
  4. ^ Uni-Solar holds the record using a three-layer a-Si cell, with 14.9% initial production, but falling to 13% over a short time. See Yang et all, "Triple-junction amorphous silicon alloy solar cell with 14.6% initial and 13.0% stable conversion efficiencies", Applied Physics Letters, 1997
  5. ^ Spire pushes solar cell record to 42.3%, Optics.org, 7 Oct 2010
  6. ^ Baskoutas, Sotirios; Terzis, Andreas F. (2006). "Size-dependent band gap of colloidal quantum dots". Journal of Applied Physics 99: 013708. Bibcode:2006JAP....99a3708B. doi:10.1063/1.2158502. 
  7. ^ H. Sargent, E. (2005). "Infrared Quantum Dots". Advanced Materials 17: 515. doi:10.1002/adma.200401552. 
  8. ^ Barnham, K. W. J.; Duggan, G. (1990). "A new approach to high-efficiency multi-band-gap solar cells". Journal of Applied Physics 67: 3490. Bibcode:1990JAP....67.3490B. doi:10.1063/1.345339. 
  9. ^ B. O’Regan and M. Gratzel, (1991). "A low-cost, high efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 films". Nature 353 (353): 737–740. Bibcode:1991Natur.353..737O. doi:10.1038/353737a0. 
  10. ^ J Emsley, "Nature's Building Blocks: An A-Z Guide to the Elements", Oxford University Press. pp. 368–370
  11. ^ "New Inexpensive Solar Cell Design is Pioneered", University of Toronto, 3 August 2010
  12. ^ Prashant Kamat, "Quantum Dot Solar Cells: Semiconductor Nanocrystals As Light Harvesters", Workshop on Nanoscience for Solar Energy Conversion, 27–29 October 2008, p. 8
  13. ^ Schaller, R.; Klimov, V. (2004). "High Efficiency Carrier Multiplication in PbSe Nanocrystals: Implications for Solar Energy Conversion". Physical Review Letters 92. arXiv:cond-mat/0404368. Bibcode:2004PhRvL..92r6601S. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.186601. PMID 15169518. 
  14. ^ Ellingson, Randy J.; Beard, Matthew C.; Johnson, Justin C.; Yu, Pingrong; Micic, Olga I.; Nozik, Arthur J.; Shabaev, Andrew; Efros, Alexander L. (2005). "Highly Efficient Multiple Exciton Generation in Colloidal PbSe and PbS Quantum Dots". Nano Letters 5 (5): 865–71. Bibcode:2005NanoL...5..865E. doi:10.1021/nl0502672. PMID 15884885. 
  15. ^ "Quantum Dot Materials Can Reduce Heat, Boost Electrical Output", NREL Press Release, 23 May 2005
  16. ^ Jeff Hecht, "Work light twice as hard to make cheap solar cells", Newscientist, 1 October 2010
  17. ^ "Are Silicon 'Quantum Dots' a Key to High-Efficiency Solar Cells?", 2007 Research Review , NREL, 2007
  18. ^ "Unique Quantum Effect Found in Silicon Nanocrystals", NREL Press Release, 24 July 2007
  19. ^ D.S. Ginger and N.C. Greenham, (1999). "Photoinduced electron transfer from conjugated polymers to CdSe nanocrystals". Phys. Rev. B 59: 10622. Bibcode:1999PhRvB..5910622G. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.59.10622. 
  20. ^ Ilan Gur, Neil A. Fromer, Michael L. Geier, and A. Paul Alivisatos, (2005). "Air-Stable All-Inorganic Nanocrystal Solar Cells Processed from Solution". Science 310 (5745): 462–465. Bibcode:2005Sci...310..462G. doi:10.1126/science.1117908. PMID 16239470. 
  21. ^ Quantum Dots May Boost Photovoltaic Efficiency To 65%

External links[edit]