This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dogs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Canidae and commonly referred to as "dogs" and of which the domestic dog is but one of its many members, on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DogsWikipedia:WikiProject DogsTemplate:WikiProject DogsDogs articles
I use to watch this show all the time and then completly forgot about it. I feel kinda giulty.
Cleanup
Yow, this article needs some serious work. First of all, the Controversy section in particular sounds like it was pasted off a fan site, then starts rambling about the show's ratings and cancellation, all with absolutely no cites whatsoever. Discussion of fan fiction is completely inappropriate for an encyclopedia article and doesn't belong here at all. The entire tone jumps out of objectivity and right into a rabid fan's gushing about the show. The whole thing needs to be cleaned up and refined into an encyclopedic article and not a fansite.Rebochan22:29, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I've gone through and removed the POV stuff you were talking about, but I'll probably need more time to dig up some reliable sources to replace the fact templates. Blast 20,02,07 2113 (UTC)
No Nonsense
Some unregistered user keeps posting stuff in this article and the ones about Hunter and Colleen concerning an unaired Road Rovers Christmas Special. I have run searches on a number of engines and turned up no trace of this, indicating that it's just junk. Could someone in charge block this article to non-registered users, please? .Ben 1010:40, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Cancellation
Wow! the whole cancellation story is completely false. The ratings were completely irrelevant. The true story is there was a law suit between Warner Brothers and Bruce Blumenfeld. I can't believe nobody had mentioned this before. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.45.7.38 (talk) 00:27, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Since the release of the DVD, I'm updating the listing for Road Rovers and the episodes on imdb.com and here. Is there tangible and verifiable proof of the 14th episode's actual release or is it just conjecture?