Jump to content

Talk:Krishna

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 66.49.148.92 (talk) at 21:39, 18 November 2015 (Hare Krishnas are not Hindus: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:Vital article

Former good articleKrishna was one of the Philosophy and religion good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 13, 2008Good article nomineeListed
November 6, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
March 1, 2013Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Later life

is there any verifiable basis for Gandhari's curse? If so, why does the later life not talk about this? 98.206.68.196 (talk)tkul....

Krishna belonged to Abhira (Ahir) Tribe.

http://books.google.co.in/books?id=P3uD22Ghqs4C&pg=PA197&dq=krishna+was+abhira&hl=en&ei=NTuQTdpSwp1xxJTVlQo&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=7&ved=0CEsQ6AEwBg#v=onepage&q=krishna%20was%20abhira&f=false

Indian sociology through Ghurye, a dictionary By S. Devadas Pillaipage -197

Epilogue of Mahabharata http://books.google.co.in/books?id=fmzXAAAAMAAJ&q=krishna+was+abhira&dq=krishna+was+abhira&hl=en&ei=NTuQTdpSwp1xxJTVlQo&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=5&ved=0CEEQ6AEwBA

http://books.google.co.in/books?id=voLXAAAAMAAJ&q=krishna+was+abhira&dq=krishna+was+abhira&hl=en&ei=NTuQTdpSwp1xxJTVlQo&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=9&ved=0CFQQ6AEwCA Krishna Leela theme in Rajasthani miniatures


http://books.google.co.in/books?ei=aD2QTbWFJcLMcL7FnYYK&ct=result&id=qZvWAAAAMAAJ&dq=krishna+was+abhira&q=abhira http://books.google.co.in/books?ei=aD2QTbWFJcLMcL7FnYYK&ct=result&id=qZvWAAAAMAAJ&dq=krishna+was+abhira&q=abhiras Hinduism and Buddhism: an historical sketch, Volume 1 By Sir Charles Eliot

http://books.google.co.in/books?id=kMnOBpUy7P4C&pg=PA158&dq=krishna+was+abhira&hl=en&ei=aD2QTbWFJcLMcL7FnYYK&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=6&ved=0CEIQ6AEwBTgU#v=onepage&q&f=false Hindu Gods and Heroes http://books.google.co.in/books?id=_r1buuxthXoC&pg=PA97&dq=krishna+was+abhira&hl=en&ei=VD-QTZagH8qycMXUmYsK&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCgQ6AEwADge#v=onepage&q=krishna%20was%20abhira&f=false

Ahir king Nand Baba and Vasudeva were brothers.

The cattle and the stick: an ethnographic profile of the Raut of Chhattisgarh

http://books.google.co.in/books?ei=VD-QTZagH8qycMXUmYsK&ct=result&id=wT-BAAAAMAAJ&dq=krishna+was+abhira&q=yaduvansi

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Krishna. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:26, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Books

please add all the books related to the lord krishna — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anurag sitar (talkcontribs) 18:09, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Revert Reason

Link to revert. - Kautilya3 (talk) 11:27, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Kautilya3, please elaborate on how the content you deleted was undue. Previous and next Births holds high importance in Jainism especially of a Tirthankara. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 10:17, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Guy Beck's volume titled "Alternative Krishnas" has 9 chapters, each covering an alternative vision of Krishna. None of these should swamp the mainstream ideas on Krishna. We need appropriate sources that cover all ideas of Krishna in order to determine due weightage. We also need to know how important Krishna is in Jainism. Can you provide sources for that please? - Kautilya3 (talk) 10:21, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Krishna is the ninth Vasudeva who are Salakapurusa (heroes on whose life Jain Scriptures are based). The primary sources of his Jain version of story are Salakapurusa and Harivamsa Purana. However, I would have to search for scholar coverage of the texts. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 10:50, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The source I shared, is it not good enough? -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 10:52, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The "source" you shared, an article contributed by Padmanabh S. Jaini, says Even a cursory glance at the Jaina Puranas makes it clear that the Jaina authors who composed them knew the Hindu Epics and Puranas well, studied them with the attention worthy of a board of censors examining the offensive portions of a story, and finally decided to rewrite the script in conformity with their own doctrines and sensibilities. So it is WP:UNDUE to write about Jain mythology as if it were a fact or as if it is accepted myth by all parties. - Kautilya3 (talk) 11:02, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I cited Wendy Doniger, not Jaini. Please recheck in sfn. Here is another source of German religious scholar depicting the relationship of Krishna and Arishtanemi Jainism by Helmuth von Glasenapp -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 11:09, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You referred to a book edited by Wendy Doniger with articles by many contributors. The article by Jaini that you referred to makes it clear that the Jaina mythology has been created around personas that originally belonged to the Hindu mythology. You are on very tricky territory here, and you should edit this content only after you have acquired a thorough scholarship of the sources. Please don't use Google books and isolated quotes without full understanding. The other book by von Glasenapp has already been discussed on your talk page, and you were told by admins not to use it. - Kautilya3 (talk) 11:25, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
How about this as a source to throw some light on importance of Krishna in Jainism Kautilya3?
Remember that newspapers are only reliable for news. This is a film review. So, unless you can establish that the authors are scholars, it can't be used. - Kautilya3 (talk) 14:38, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

() I agree that info about Krishna in hell and Tirthankara needs to be included. I have read it earlier in a RS, don't remember where. --Redtigerxyz Talk 12:33, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fine as long as WP:DUE weight is respected and the Jain narratives are mentioned as "counternarratives." (The source was mentioned above.) - Kautilya3 (talk) 14:07, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hare Krishnas are not Hindus

Proposal to classify Hare Krishnas as non Hindus given the fact that they contradict mainstream Hindu believe of Brahman being the supreme god. also worship of srila prabhupada is not universal especially of living human beings. Also the birth date of Krishna is disputed given the fact that the Vedas have a composition date later than that of what is claimed in the article.