Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Julius h (talk | contribs) at 14:07, 27 February 2016 (→‎Bond (for international development): new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.
Shortcuts

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in "articles for deletion" debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page.

Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

Instructions for special cases


float
float
float
float
Please enter the page's title to request its undeletion:

Deletion discussions
Articles
Templates and modules
Files
Categories
Redirects
Miscellany
Speedy deletion
Proposed deletion

List of League of Legends champions

requesting userfication, the deleting admin, sandstein, has declined to restore the page for a draft -Prisencolin (talk) 04:35, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'm somewhat hesitant to restore anything deleted at AfD that was declined by the deleting admin, in this case Sandstein. Maybe he'd be willing to e-mail you a copy? Otherwise I will note that much of the same material is already present at this Wikia for the game, but I am mildly concerned that there might not be enough sourcing to justify a character list page. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:05, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've declined undeletion because I don't think this can become viable as an article, it's just fancruft better suited for fan wikis. What other admins do with this request is up to them.  Sandstein  12:22, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Contrary to the near unanimous deletion consensus at the last AFD, I think beyond a doubt that this article is notable. Just look up 'league of legends champions' (without quotes) in the reliable video game sources custom search engine.--Prisencolin (talk) 22:34, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Can some other admin restore a draft to userspace? I'd like to have all of the edit history available, so it would be preferable to an email copy.--Prisencolin (talk) 01:29, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Prisencolin: I share Sandstein's doubts that the problems with this article can be overcome (especially after its recent disastrous deletion review), but tell you what. I'm willing to userfy this if you'll agree not to attempt to move or copy it into mainspace without getting approval at DRV first. I don't think that's likely to happen, and I can pretty much guarantee that it won't without significantly better sourcing; but still, nobody else seems to be stepping forward to restore it for you. Does this sound reasonable to you? —Cryptic 08:37, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the help, that seems doable. Just one thing though, is DRV really the right place to request that the page be restored?--Prisencolin (talk) 21:58, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Prisencolin: Cryptic is offering to restore the article to your userspace conditional on a promise from you that you will not move it to main article space without proper review. I would say DRV isn't the place where a such a review would be conducted, but a review by the deleting admin, to confirm that the article addresses the objections in the AFD discussion, would be appropriate. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:52, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  @Prisencolin and Amatulic: Now at User:Prisencolin/List of League of Legends champions. One of deletion review's purposes is to review drafts to see if they've been sufficiently improved for restoration post-AFD (recent example); while this is usually in the context of the article having been protected against creation, the situation here is analogous. Review by Sandstein would be fine by me too, but his previous comments leave me with the impression that you'd have better luck at DRV. —Cryptic 04:33, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RoPeCast (no proper undelete request, but providing a copy)

Hi.

I got a highly polite pointer to put the following request here despite it not being an actual request to undelete an article. :-)

Could someone please provide me with a copy of the latest version of RoPeCast before deletion, I'd like to reuse the information in that article on a different page. A temp copy to user NS would be great, maybe User:Chrkl/RoPeCast would be suitable? Thanks! --chris 論 —Preceding undated comment added 10:37, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Done See User:Chrkl/RoPeCast @Chrkl: --S Philbrick(Talk) 18:40, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a lot! --chris 論 12:22, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jehovah elyon sunday school

this page is it just an organisation for children so i just want the name of the organisation to be known -13:19, 18 February 2016 (UTC)SegunIMichael (talk)

Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted as-is here; try contacting the deleting administrator (JohnCD (talk · contribs)). Alternatively, you may request the page be restored as a draft or to have the contents of its last known revision emailed to you provided you have email enabled in your account's preferences. That isn't what Wikipedia is for, and we routinely block users who're only here for that reason. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 01:09, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Shapers

Hello,

Could you please restaure the page of the French punk rock band The Shapers?

The band has toured USA, Canada, China, Thailand, France and above all Indonesia where they performed on many TV Shows. The band has shared the stage with NOFX, Pennywise (band), Face to Face (punk band), Superman Is Dead, Pee Wee Gaskins (band), and many other bands such as the Japanese girls band Scandal (Japanese band) at Le Bataclan in Paris.

Please find below some articles about The Shapers:

In English:

In French :

In German :

In Indonesian :

Thank you.

Best regards. -Poppunkskate (talk) 00:01, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Poppunkskate: Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Shapers, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Juliancolton (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 09:56, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Erin Lee Carr

She is a notable documentary filmmaker. Not quite sure why it was speedy deleted, but the admin said to take it here if I had an issue. So I did. -~EDDY (talk/contribs)~ 00:18, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Editorofthewiki::  Done. The article was deleted under WP:CSD#A7 WP:CSD#G7 because the author blanked the page (pinging Starsxxx for comment). I have restored it, but you should improve it if you can, because I do not think it would withstand a notability challenge - the only achievement referenced is a single documentary film, which is not enough for WP:CREATIVE. JohnCD (talk) 10:12, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:William Harvey-Kelly

I, Myleskelly, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Myleskelly (talk) 10:23, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Myleskelly: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 10:31, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Anthony Donnelly

I, PereckDDD, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. PereckDDD (talk) 16:54, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@PereckDDD:  Not done - this was hopelessly promotional ("focuses on providing exceptional care... dedicated to providing the highest level of service... " etc), and if restored would be speedily deleted as an advertisement. It needs a complete rewrite, but before putting much effort into it, you should read WP:Your first article, WP:Notability (people) and WP:Notability (summary) - Wikipedia is not LinkedIn, it is an encyclopedia and so is quite selective about subjects for articles. JohnCD (talk) 22:20, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:NPS Logo.svg

This image was deleted for this reason: 01:51, 20 April 2011 Orphaned image deletion bot (talk | contribs) deleted page File:NPS Logo.svg (Unused non-free media (bot)). I would like to request this page be restored so I can license them under a free license or in the public domain, because I believe the NPS is simple and only consists of text, simple geometric shape (circle), and ellipsis. However, I'm not sure that the NPS may be possibly complex enough to have a copyright or not, but maybe I will license it under a free license, instead of in the public domain. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. XPanettaa (talk) 21:49, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@XPanettaa: This is an organization logo, more than text and shapes, it has an actual design to it. As such cannot possibly be public domain or released under a free license, unless you are a representative of NPS who is authorized to release it. The licensing and fair-use rationale for the image was valid; the only reason it was deleted was because it was not used in any article. If you can specify which article will have that image, I can restore it, and no further work will be needed. ~Amatulić (talk) 01:18, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Amatulic: Yeah, but this logo was deleted back in April 2011 because it was not used in any article, but I think you can restore it, because I am a representative of the NPS who is authorized to release it. I believe this organization logo might be simple enough as it consists of text and ellipsis. However, I want to see how simple enough this organization logo is. XPanettaa (talk) 17:23, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@XPanettaa: We cannot rely on the word of an arbitrary user account that it represents an organization and is authorized to release copyrighted material. You need to follow the instructions at WP:CONSENT. Be sure to send the email from an address that is verifiably from your organization, rather than from a free email service.
I also recommend that you disclose your conflict of interest publicly on your user page. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:47, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Translation Pedagogy

OTRS ticket received -Darwinius (talk) 01:08, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Darwinius:  Done, though as usual when something written for other purposes is copied here, it will require work to make an acceptable article that is not original research.
As the link you provided goes only to the OTRS login page, and I do not have OTRS access, will you add the appropriate release templates? JohnCD (talk) 16:23, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@JohnCD:  Done, can you please check the draft talk page to ensure everything is Ok? I'll also forward your advice to the permission sender.--Darwinius (talk) 16:52, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MaheshDarji

This is not about Personal biography.This article is made for giving inspiration to the youth and this is required for today's Generation,So Please Consider This Article as Helpful and Refund This Article
Thank You -MaheshDarji (talk) 12:05, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done and will not be done. (User has been blocked for persistent self-promotion). JohnCD (talk) 16:06, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jubin nautiyal at promotions.jpg

OTRS ticket received -Darwinius (talk) 13:15, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Darwinius: I added a note to the OTRS ticket. Some investigation needs to be done concerning the actual author of the photo. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:59, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Amatulic: Thanks.--Darwinius (talk) 18:35, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

lant

I don't agree that there's no place in wikipedia for this article, one now must visit several pages to collect all the interesting facts regarding this -koszik (talk) 14:50, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Koszik: Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Riventree (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days to which you would be welcome to contribute. JohnCD (talk) 16:00, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This belongs in wiktionary not wikipedia. It's a term that describes a transition product that is discussed (well) in the directly related pages on either end of the transition: (urine, ammonia, saltpeter, phosphorus, urea, silver fulminate, etc.). Don't hit me with the WP:IDONTLIKEIT stick. The differences between a term definition (for wiktionary) and a topic (for wikipedia) are subtle for some people, but this is manifestly the former, and there is little that might be legitimately added here that isn't better inserted under the (more) relevant extant pages. (Vis, very few backlinks, even from the historical process pages)
I counterpropose it be moved to wiktionary, and then filled out as the undelete-proposer likes. Would that suit everyone?
Riventree (talk) 16:30, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No, I don't agree. There is already wikt:lant, which is about the word; this is about the thing. JohnCD (talk) 16:21, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
What you're saying applies to most intermediate products, and as a consequence a lot of data is duplicated, but that's how encyclopedias work. The article I just linked provides little more than the definition itself - should it be deleted in your opinion? koszik (talk) 23:49, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Italian school of differential geometry

I, Ema--or, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ema--or (talk) 15:24, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Explanation: more precisely, I would like to userfy said page. Hope we can come to a solution. Ema--or (talk) 15:24, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Ema--or: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Italian school of differential geometry (better than userfying, you can work on it there, but it's also more easily accessible for anyone else). Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.. JohnCD (talk) 16:24, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

14:22, 21 February 2016 Sphilbrick (talk

I, 2601:742:4000:B60:DD39:3CB2:9ED4:86B3, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2601:742:4000:B60:DD39:3CB2:9ED4:86B3 (talk) 16:04, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please give the name of the page you want undeleted. JohnCD (talk) 16:12, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Southern Folklife Collection

OTRS ticket received -Darwinius (talk) 17:35, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tosin Adarabioyo

Please restore the editing history prior to this article being deleted by PROD. Player now notable. Thanks JMHamo (talk) 20:54, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. JohnCD (talk) 16:31, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creating Draft:Holly Van Hart

User:Sky arth sky 23:16, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Sky arth: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 17:13, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Goddess Garden Organics

I, TraciThomas, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. TraciThomas (talk) 23:31, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Parent Aide

137.118.104.172 (talk) 00:21, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!"
Read WP:Your first article for advice, and note the need for references that verify what the article says. JohnCD (talk) 22:46, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Illinois Open Championship

My reasoning is I work for the Illinois PGA as the senior director of operations and public relations, who owes and administers the Illinois Open Championship, and has since the early 1920's, and I uploaded the image of the Illinois Open trophy that we own and we photographed, thus we own the rights, making it fair use for us to do what we please with. Thanks! -Beeonenine (talk) 02:47, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done, nothing to do. The article isn't deleted. ~Amatulić (talk) 05:26, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft talk:Sandbox

Like Draft:Sandbox, the talk page was also deleted by mistake. -96.41.0.15 (talk) 04:38, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, restored. ~Amatulić (talk) 05:26, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jayna Tida

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Jennifer2427 (talk) 10:10, 22 February 2016 (UTC) I would like to retrieve the contents written for this article as it was deleted. Have been advised by Cahk (talk) to do so here[reply]

Kind Regards Jennifer

Draft:Derek ong sieng hui

I, Dreamity6, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sincerely Yours 14:53, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

@Dreamity6:  Not done - that was not an encyclopedia article about a person, it was an advertisement for his restaurant and his "(world famed) but (locally) designed (wood-fired) pizza... Balinese & water features themed garden venue... " etc. Nothing like that is allowed in Wikipedia. JohnCD (talk) 20:42, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Room for More

Would like to updates article and provide additional references -Ncandr (talk) 16:38, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Ncandr: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 20:57, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Omni Journal

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -ArtistAeron (talk) 18:33, 22 February 2016 (UTC) There is currently no definition for this term, used by journaling folks, anywhere on Wiki... I was trying to start a page to explain what it is. I am NOT trying to promote or sell anything! Not sure how you came up with that... I don't have time to read the 800 page user manual; I used to write for wiki many years ago. Nowhere in my article, which I was planning on improving, was there anything being promoted![reply]

@ArtistAeron: checkY restored to draft. I agree that this is not promotional, but it is not ready for the encyclopedia so I have restored it to Draft:Omni journal where you can work on it. I am not too optimistic about its prospects, because an encyclopedia is not a place to introduce new expressions - Wikipedia is quite resistant to neologisms (see WP:NEO) and an article would require references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject", i.e. that that this term is being used and discussed, independently of you. The only reference in your page is a deadlink; a quick Google search found only your Youtube video, several sites selling this kind of notebook (which may be why your article was thought to be promotion), and some journals called Omni.
So, if "Omnijournal" in your sense is a concept being widely used and discussed, please add to the draft references to show that, and click the "Submit" button when you are ready. Read WP:Your first article for advice. But if it is your new idea then, sorry, but Wikipedia is not here to help you spread the word. JohnCD (talk) 20:31, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thank you, I will work on it..... — Preceding unsigned comment added by ArtistAeron (talk • contribs) 19:35, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Tenet (ensemble)

I, 124.171.142.179, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. I had been working on this page over the summer; however, I had then travelled to Australia to start schooling and became too preoccupied to work on the article. I would like to continue editing it and hopefully get it approved. -124.171.142.179 (talk) 22:13, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 22:38, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dada Nada

Article was deleted by prod (I was the tagger) and subsequently recreated as a redirect. Article creator is contesting the prod on my talk page. I think the redirect is the obvious best resolution, but I'm willing to let it be restored so I take it to AfD. ---Finngall talk 23:55, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Finngall. Done. Upon a quick glance, maybe there's some content that can be merged from it into Robert Ozn (if sourced), and maybe that page should have a dedicated section about the act (if it doesn't already), but it doesn't appear there should be separate articles.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:07, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Jompson Brothers

I, Danielclower, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Danielclower (talk) 07:05, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Danielclower:  Done as the result of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Jompson Brothers was SOFTDELETE, the article has been restored on request. You are encouraged to improve the article to address the reasons for its nomination at AfD. JohnCD (talk) 10:51, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Fbot/Blacklist2

Could someone copy-paste the contents of this page to my userspace at User:Fastily/Sandbox? This is one of my old bot configuration pages that I'd like to apply to my current bot. Thanks, -FASTILY 10:02, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Fastily:  Done JohnCD (talk) 10:44, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! -FASTILY 11:26, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jaybee319/sandbox

I, Jaybee319, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jaybee319 (talk) 21:47, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Trying to locate documentation took longer than anticipated -Jaybee319 (talk) 21:48, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. The original target was G8'd, as the sandbox was moved to draft space; I've thus retargeted the request to point to the draft. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 21:52, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Jeremy.
@Jaybee319: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page Draft:Kristen Jensen (2) has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
Some of the draft as you left it was flagged as a copyright violation, with material copied from the subject's website. That has been cleaned up by another editor; please read Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources and make sure to write in your own words. Even if the copyright issue were resolved, material written by or for the subject usually has a promotional tone unsuitable for an encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 22:31, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

TechFly

I am of sole belief that suitable citations have been made and whilst we are currently searching for further and reliable citations we believe that as an organisation the information on the page is correct. -CharlieJamesTennant (talk) 22:46, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done because there's nothing to do. @CharlieJamesTennant: Why are you commenting on this page? The article isn't deleted, so there is nothing actionable here. Even if it was deleted, this page cannot be used to request restoration of an article that was deleted as a result of community discussion. You are welcome to engage in this discussion right now at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TechFly. If the article does get deleted, then you must appeal to the deleting administrator to get it restored (not this page), and if that fails, your next recourse is Wikipedia:Deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:11, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) :@CharlieJamesTennant: this page has not been deleted. Deletion is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TechFly, and that is where you should comment, but first read WP:DISCUSSAFD and the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide.
It is not enough that the information is correct: Wikipedia's criterion for inclusion, called Wikipedia:Notability, requires references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." The test is, have people not connected with the subject thought it important or significant enough to write substantial comment about? See also Wikipedia:Notability (summary). JohnCD (talk) 23:14, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The_Last_Year

I, Unitednut, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Unitednut (talk) 01:26, 24 February 2016 (UTC) The band is releasing a new album in 2016. One of the singles released in 2015, Mania, was on the Top 20 best of the year in Central America. They have increased notoriety since they launched in 2014. -Unitednut (talk) 01:29, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Great Lakes Education Project

I, Cbailey15, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Cbailey15 (talk) 03:42, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Was waiting on approval from companies attorney pertaining to language -Cbailey15 (talk) 03:43, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Arjun Prabhakaran

I found the page and its sources as reliable and relevent, since the situation on the time of its deletion has changed and saw some reliable information about this person on web -8.37.224.157 (talk) 04:22, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Sabina Sakoh

I, AntonioRusconi, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. AntonioRusconi (talk) 09:29, 24 February 2016 (UTC) OR, at least make a safety-copy of the latest editing and previous criticism. Please note that the said article has been accepted in the German Wikipedia, while also a French adaptation appeared in the meantime. Thank you in advance & kind regards 09:33, 24 February 2016 (UTC) AntonioRusconi (talk)[reply]

@AntonioRusconi: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
Acceptance in the German Wikipedia is not conclusive, as different WPs have their own rules and standards; but there may be references there that could be added. JohnCD (talk) 09:45, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kamran Zahid

I, Poetawan, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kamran Zahid 12:54, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Not done This appears to be a copyright violation of his Facebook page.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:22, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Benjamin_Rush_Maginley

Hello! I've been busy with a project the last year and finished... and would like to attack this page again. and then click the "Save page" button below -Ropples (talk) 15:10, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Mātrusri Anasuya Devī

Rahik1 (talk) 17:17, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fixing the links Hasteur (talk) 18:50, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Rahik1: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 22:24, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Felip III de Castella

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Elastut (talk) 20:20, 24 February 2016 (UTC) Deleted by mistake[reply]

 Not done, nothing to do. There is no deleted article with any similar name beginning with "Felip" in main space, draft space, or AFC space, and your user account has no deleted contributions either. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:53, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Elastut: this is the English-language Wikipedia. The article you mention is on the Catalan Wikipedia at ca:Felip III de Castella, and you should ask about it there - each Wikipedia is a separate organization.
Aquest és Wikipedia en l'idioma anglès . L'article que esmentes està en el català Wikipedia - ca:Felip III de Castella. Cada Wikipedia és una organització independent. JohnCD (talk) 22:21, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Cade Jay Hathaway

I, Daveyporter, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Daveyporter (talk) 22:17, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Daveyporter: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 22:26, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Life Science Network (LSN)

This submission was not adequately supported by reliable sources. -HBorbital78 (talk) 07:38, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@HBorbital78: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 10:32, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:The Whipper Snappers

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Matupitu (talk) 10:46, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well that might be because I followed the instructions and it only says to paste the heading into the title box. Draft:The Whipper Snappers It is frustrating when you follow instructions, only to get a condescending message. I regularly contribute financially to Wikipedia which is contingent on good will. There are a lot of people who are experts in their field with a lot of essential information, but rarely post to Wiki. Am sure there are Wiki experts which little expertise apart from the rules of Wiki. Disenfranchising the first group is counter-productive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Matupitu (talk • contribs) 10:57, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Matupitu: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
I will have another look at the instructions for this page, people do seem to have difficulty with them. The message in red is not aimed at you, but is provided automatically by the system to assist the volunteers responding to requests here. JohnCD (talk) 11:50, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Tim Harvey (Novelist)

I now have extra info which should allow this page to be published once I edit it. [Special:Contributions/78.150.162.110|78.150.162.110]] (talk) 11:39, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined pending further information. This was undeleted last August after this request, but no edits were made to improve the entry for resubmission. Articles for creation is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's article mainspace. We may be willing to restore it again, but only if you provide a definite assurance that you actually intend to work on it and provide a short description of what you intend to do to improve it to meet our policies and guidelines. Please advise. JohnCD (talk) 11:56, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:The Pearl Harts

I, Tapfs, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kzoo 12:46, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

@Tapfs: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 16:37, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem)

I would like to work on the article to address the issues that have been raised by the editor. The article was deleted because I haven't worked on it for more than six months. -ValeriyaMechkova (talk) 13:32, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@ValeriyaMechkova: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!"
Read WP:Your first article for advice, and note particularly the need for references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" to establish Wikipedia:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 16:47, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Medicalresearch.com

I, 71.224.201.19, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 71.224.201.19 (talk) 14:29, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined pending further information. This was undeleted over six months ago with a pledge that it would be worked on, but no edits were made to improve the entry for resubmission. Articles for creation is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's article mainspace. We may be willing to restore it again, but only if you provide a definite assurance that you actually intend to work on it and provide a short description of what you intend to do to improve it to meet our policies and guidelines. Please advise. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:51, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Gerard Ramon

I, SP371, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. SP371 (talk) 15:41, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@SP371: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:54, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

International Misophonia Research Network

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Drjobrout (talk) 03:56, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Wiki Editor,

Hello. This is Dr. Jennifer Jo Brout. I did not make this page. However, the International Misophonia Research Network belongs to me. It is an extension of the Sensation and Emotion Network, which I began in 2008. I believe the deletion of this page is a result of a debacle that has taken place concerning the Misophonia page. I will explain.

I have been personally attacked by Judith Krauthamer who as you can see threatened to use "her network" to change the Misophonia page back to how she wants it. Please see below. Notably, I never insulted her work and have no idea why she is so upset. I have not made any changes to the Misophonia page since this past summer at which point I was so distressed from my experience with wiki that I vowed never to come back here.

I now understand however that "imperceptions" changed the misophonia page ,and has that now her changes on the Misophonia page have been flagged as COI. That being the case, now this page is being deleted. The International Research Network very much exists and there was nothing on there that was not factual. How does one have a COI with facts? Regardless, this can all be traced to the mechanizations of one person with a personal vendetta. In short, for whatever her reasons are, Ms. Krauthamer also has a COI with me (read below) and should have no influence on any changes that include me or any of my programs. Again, from what I can see on the history page of Misophonia "imperceptions" was bullied and you, the wiki editors, were used as pawns. All of this has led to the deletion of my International Misophonia Research Network page. Please see Judith's comments below.

Judith

"noticed on wiki page your comments and edit of my work. I will use my network to change it back. However, I am beyond insulted and I am letting you know that you have lost an ally (and believe me, I have been defending and supporting you in ways you are unaware of). You can rationalize any way you chose for what you have done-- that is your option-- and the edits will be changed (yes, it will be an edit game going back and forth) but the damage is done and my community of support will ultimately know the behind the scenes story. . Just went into the edits and noticed that there are two! editors who have removed your stuff for "self promotion." I am going to create an account for wiki as you did so that I can edit the page myself. Jen, you messed with my work without talking to me about it first. I feel you have crossed a line here. Its no big deal-- the wiki page goes back and forth anyway. HOwever, to discredit my work is simply beyond the pale".

It is unfortunate that Judith took these simple changes that misperceptions made as a personal insult as they were not. However, this does not justify the deletion of a wiki page for International Misophonia Research Network. It most certainly exists. You can verify it by going to the website misophonia-research.com and you can see my other website senationandemotion.com which stands for Sensation and Emotion Network and has existed since 2008. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Jennifer Jo Brout

@Drjobrout:  Not done The page International Misophonia Research Network did not exist until 10 February, when user Imperceptions created it and, within an hour, blanked it. Blanking of a page by its sole author is treated as a request to delete. This page would not, in any case, have been acceptable, being written in a promotional style and in the first person: "we build bridges between researchers we feel have our best interests in mind and with whom we can communicate... We stand behind research we believe in and stand against that which we do not..." That reads as IMRN telling the world about itself, and that is not what Wikipedia is for.
The page Misophonia has not been deleted and is being actively edited. You are welcome to contribute there, but since it appears that, in respect of this, you have from Wikipedia's point of view a Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, you should read that page and the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. In summary, you should not edit the article directly, but suggest any changes on the article talk page, declaring your interest and citing reliable sources for the changes you propose. If discussion on the talk page fails to reach WP:Consensus, there are WP:Dispute resolution processes available, but edit-warring on the article is not the way to pursue these disagreements.
If you think the IMRN should have an article you may propose a draft through Wikipedia:Articles for creation for review by uninvolved users, but it should not be a manifesto like the Feb 10 one, should be written from an outside, neutral point of view, facts and achievements rather than opinions and aims, should be based on what others say about IMRN not what it says about itself, and needs references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" to establish Wikipedia:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 10:26, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
JohnCD, the article was recreated here IMRN. It was PRODed by Bonadea; i replaced that with a speedy-promo tag, citing this discussion and the previously deleted article. Jytdog (talk) 19:20, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted, though as A7 rather than G11 because the actual wording was not so overtly promotional as the previous version. JohnCD (talk) 19:55, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ICF Junior & U23 Canoe World Championships

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Youngasianboys (talk) 07:17, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done - this is a blocked sockpuppet. JohnCD (talk) 17:47, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Asian Championships and other sports events that deleted by you

Sphilbrick, this admin delet many correct page because of the selfishness and stubbornness and this vandal and Destructive user Mohsen1248, he prevent any edit and creat in sports events.

hi and please help from delet Sphilbrick admin. You just deleted many article because not adopt parsa amoli and allfutsal ip. You should not have deleted them because it was contested. Please restore the articles. A banned user might have created it, poorly, but it is a valid subject and if nothing else, their research and typing can be used if I or someone else chooses to improve upon it. the user Mohsen 1248 has a Destructive role that prevent to creat any new pages and any edit in sport events page. He with this destructive behavior caused others angry and make vandalism. He takes prevent any creation or constructive modification. he make the sports pages to his personal property. all of pages you delet have a correct and usefull content. 1996 concaf futsal many years not exist. The removal process is inconsistent with the values of Wikipedia and Of the selfishness and stubbornness. thanks a lot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Youngasianboys (talk • contribs) 07:17, 26 February 2016

 Not done. Since you have been blocked, you will not get anywhere by repeatedly setting up new accounts. It is you that is blocked, not the account. If you want to contribute, you should read the WP:Guide to appealing blocks and make an unblock request on the talk page of your original account or, if that is protected, through the Wikipedia:Unblock Ticket Request System.
You need to read Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources (you mustn't), Wikipedia:Notability (Wikipedia does not want articles about everything that exists, only things that other people have independently thought worth writing about) and Wikipedia:Verifiability (anything added needs a reliable source), to understand why your articles were deleted, and make clear in your unblock request that you understand those pages. JohnCD (talk) 17:53, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Bobby McKeown

Need additional time to research sources -Jamck (talk) 19:05, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Jamck: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 19:57, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Coalition for Responbile Home Education

I, Forgedimagination, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Forgedimagination (talk) 21:41, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Forgedimagination: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Coalition for Responsible Home Education (fixing the typo in the title). Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 22:11, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Atlantic Airlines (United States)

Atlantic Airlines is a US airline, this page would benefit the company so googlers could find information about it quickly. -Jackpaylor (talk) 22:08, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We don't do things for the benefit of a company; that would go against our core principles. What you'd need to show is that it meets our standards for inclusion, which is why it was deleted in the first place. — Earwig talk 02:14, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atlantic Airlines (United States), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:49, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Activated Filter Media

I, KiooTiaa, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. KiooTiaa (talk) 02:15, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • I think that part of the reason it seems promotional is that it's partially copyvio from here and here. Kioo, we cannot accept copyrighted material on Wikipedia per WP:COPYVIO. We could probably e-mail you a copy of the material but you would have to enable email on your account per instructions at WP:ENABLEEMAIL. Even if you were to grant Wikipedia permission to use the material (assuming you're the copyright holder) this would have to be completely re-written to fit WP:NPOV. Also, I have to assume that you are someone representing the company, so make sure that you disclose this conflict of interest somewhere per WP:COI. I'd also recommend that you look into going through one of the training programs like WP:ADVENTURE. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:08, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Arden Altino

Suzart1 (talk) 12:34, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Suzart1: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 13:26, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bond (for international development)

Bond is a crucial and important international development body in the UK, with tens of thousands of members. I can't see any reason to justify its deletion, or understand why it has been. -Julius h (talk) 14:07, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=707211138"