Jump to content

Talk:Where to Invade Next

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Skulldyvan (talk | contribs) at 09:47, 20 September 2016 (Factual accuracy and representative evidence.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconFilm: Documentary / American Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Documentary films task force.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
WikiProject iconUnited States: Cinema Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force.
WikiProject iconIceland Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Iceland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iceland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconItaly Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconFrance Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconFinland Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Finland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Finland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WikiProject icon
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconSlovenia Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Slovenia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Slovenia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Slovenia to-do list:

Here are some tasks you can do (watch):

WikiProject iconGermany Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconPortugal Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Portugal To-do:

Find correct name The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere. The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo.

Improve key articles to Good article

Improve

Review

  • Category:History of Portugal: lots to remove there
  • Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box).

Requests

Assess

Need images

Translate from Portuguese Wikipedia

Wikify

Vote:

WikiProject iconNorway Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconTunisia Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Tunisia, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Tunisia. For more information, visit the project page.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.


What is this film about?

I'm curious as to what this film's about. Why has Wikipedia failed me? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:140:8100:1863:A80A:D9FC:625A:6386 (talk) 09:14, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Moore about the EU - little on the UK

"...I wanted to go to places that we could learn from, and I don’t think we have much to learn from the UK right now. I’m sorry to say that. At least in England, they have started to act like us, think like us and look like us - our fast food is everywhere. Their kids are now looking like our kids.” The guardian, Friday 2 October 2015

Might not some of the quote find a place in the article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.20.224.234 (talk) 22:14, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Factual accuracy and representative evidence.

While the film obviously represents a particular point of view, is it factually accurate? Are the examples representative and presented in good faith? To what extent have the factual claims been independently fact checked? Are there any rebuttals to the film done in good faith? Thanks! --Lbeaumont (talk) 01:04, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's appropriate to emphasize that it shows some bias that may not necessarily be called for in a documentary, maybe have a "Criticism" section summarizing articles like this one. Overall, it's pretty hard to find critical reviews imo. Skl (talk) 09:46, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]