Jump to content

User talk:Cornerstonepicker

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by AyanP (talk | contribs) at 19:36, 1 August 2017 (→‎Maluma: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

almost master english

 

Thanks

Hello friend, I read completely the article of The Boombox and you are right. This is a survey, I regret my stubbornness. Best regards! --Mixitnew (talk) 19:13, 2 December 2015 (UTC)Mixitnew[reply]

Hey bud!

Thanks for creating M-Train's awards and nominations page. I polished this one tonight. If there are no notability concerns, It may be ready for FL... :) MaranoFan (talk) 18:47, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What do you think about the article? MaranoFan (talk) 07:38, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
OK so I wont be editing for a few weeks since I have my ecxams. I just wanted to let you know that you should send the list for FL, (well, if you want to.).... :) MaranoFan (talk) 11:00, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's too soon. She only has five awards and that's make the article a little weak. I would wait. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 00:05, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Barnstar

The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
I award you this barnstar for all the award-related lists/events you've worked on, especially for Justin Timberlake and your expansions to his article. Keep it up! Snuggums (talk / edits) 03:06, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Ariana Grande's parents

Hi I noticed that you removed Ariana Grande's parents from the Ariana Grande page. You said they weren't notable, but I know her mom works as her manager and Ariana Grande has mentioned quite a fews time about her and her father so people would probably like to know that. I'll put the edits back again but if you want to remove them again please talk to me and let me know why!

Thank you! Stephilippou (talk) 05:44, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unless their parents are Celebrities or notable for the public, they shouldn't be there. See Template:Infobox_person#Parameters. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 08:22, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for responding!
Stephilippou (talk) 04:29, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Timberlake Tha Fashion Killa

Hey. I'm Justin Timberlake fan and i found some useful links if you would like to add info about his fashion style in his article.

  • DeLeon, Jian. "JUSTIN TIMBERLAKE'S 10 BEST STYLE MOVES OF 2013". GQ. Retrieved October 19, 2015.
  • Phili, Stelios. "6 STYLE MOVES TO STEAL FROM JUSTIN TIMBERLAKE". GQ. Retrieved October 19, 2015.
  • Nygaard, Sandra (February 24, 2011). "Justin Timberlake: Style Power". Men's Health. Retrieved October 19, 2015.
  • Carreon, Blue (April 2, 2013). "10 Things To Learn From Justin Timberlake's Makeover". Forbes. Retrieved October 19, 2015.
Cool, I'll take a look. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 05:34, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Drink You Away

... I would like to thank you for all the contributions and maintenance you give into the article. ;) — Tom(T2ME) 18:31, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

5sos

Hi! I just wanted to let you know a little error on the 5 seconds of summer page. It states that the boys went on the "on the road again" tour with one direction when they actually didn't. If you wanted to change it that would be great. Thanks! Katesmarsbar (talk) 18:49, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

According to http://www.webcitation.org/6XTT5XsBm they performed at the Saitama Super Arena as opening act. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 22:41, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

To Pimp A Butterfly revision

Why did you undo the addition of mastering engineer under the production heading? It is a valid addition. Grundman's has mastered some of the world's greatest music, including Michael Jackson's Thriller. It's worth noting. Mastering engineers are an integral part of the production of an album. add Bozzi to the personnel heading if you think it's more appropriate. He's listed on the good kid mad city page--- Lamar and his team including sounwave, Derek Ali, Thudercat, etc spent many hours making additions to to pimp a butterfly at grundman's studio with Bozzi Chemmech99 (talk) 02:30, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Check "Personnel" section first, official credits. Btw, you deleted the critical reception charts. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 02:51, 8 December 2015 (UTC)o[reply]
My bad, I added Mike Bozzi on "Personnel" section, the Grammys credit him. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 00:53, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sales, streaming

But you know that if RIAA change the certification's mechanism, is bc something happened. The streams are increasing, and the article says "sales" not "pure sales", RIAA count 100 streams in the US as a sale, not excuse your hatred by Fifth Harmony on sales, lol. Worth It sell 3M WITH STREAMS!!! You don't want to see the article extinct right, because your pure sales will end, lol!!!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lucas11925 (talk • contribs) 01:34, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are just assuming that. Those are streaming points, sales here are pure sales. "3x certication omg it sold 3 million!!!!" please, dont be that guy. Until you find a source stating "Worth It" has sold 3 million in the US (the chart you have edited is about the country, not WW like that tweet you showed) it will be removed. Edit: Lucas11925, I added a note there for "Worth It" multiplatinum-certification. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 01:50, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Cornerstonepicker: @Lucas11925: this is an ongoing problem with this article which has troubled me for months: in short, a lack of actual sales figures for virtually all records means it is impossible to make any accurate lists of best-selling girl group records, which really makes this article redundant.
If you read through the RfC discussion on the talk page you can see my misgivings - we felt the only way to salvage the article was to use certification levels, so the argument of Lucas11925 and Musicstan is valid: if we remove "Worth It" we have to remove virtually the whole article, because the sections for Australia, France, Germany, Canada, etc. are all implied sales based on certification levels. Japan and South Korea have sales figures, but these are mostly unverified... the Korean figures are mostly sourced from a French(!) blog. The UK figures are just about the only officially sourced ones, but even these are incomplete - for example, I can work out from OCC figures that both "Yes Sir I Can Boogie" and "Frankie" have sold in excess of 640,000 copies, so should be included on the UK singles list. But as I don't know exactly how many, or have a source, they have been excluded from the table.
There has been an attempt before to delete this article, in 2011: if it got put up for AfD again I wouldn't oppose it. Richard3120 (talk) 09:16, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Just read that, Richard3120, so he has a point. But since 2013 streaming points have been included in certifications. I guess pre-2013 all were pure-sales. Don't Cha is only platinum, but has sold 3 million in the US. Confusing. Or maybe it can be merged to "Girl groups" article. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 16:20, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The explanation behind "Don't Cha" can be found in the article used as the source for the 3M sales: it says it sold 3M on downloads in addition to a single platinum certification for old-fashioned physical sales. Which means the total sales should be 4M, not 3M. But as the person quoting those figures is Cee Lo Green, the song's co-writer, that's not really a verifiable source. And so we're back to the problem of sourcing verifiable sales figures: we can't do this for the Pussycat Dolls and we can't do this for Fifth Harmony, and we can't do it for most singles. So this is why we went with implied sales from certifications. But this is also problematic as (1) certifications are for shipments, not actual sales, (2) apart from the US and UK few countries had certifications before the 1980s, so the tables are heavily skewed towards the last twenty years, (3) it wasn't important for record companies in the past to apply for certifications, so many records from the 1950s, 60s and 70s have no certifications despite theoretically qualifying for them (see the lack of certified Supremes records in the US, or the single platinum certification for Bridge over Troubled Water in the UK, despite being one of the top 20 all-time best-selling albums in that country). The whole article is a minefield, really. Richard3120 (talk) 19:58, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reverts on Drake articles

Thank you for those reverts. Edits were against consensus, and had a "I know better than the sources attitude". They were disruptive as well, the editor took it to the talk page and continued. Thanks for the help. I was already at three reverts, so I didn't dare revert again. -- Joseph Prasad (talk) 00:58, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Year-end charts

Year-end charts are missing in This Summer's Gonna Hurt like a Motherfucker. Add it please.

Because it didn't chart in any Cornerstonepicker (talk) 20:13, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Anti Critical Reception

Hi Corner! Are you taking a full responsibility over the section? If you do, I have some tips for you: 1) If you want to build a successful CR section take a look at the previous critical receptions on Good Girl Gone Bad, Rated R or Loud (those sections are looking pretty good). 2) The first paragraph should contain the positive reviews, then the others mixed and the end negative. 3) I am gonna add some reviews in the infobox you can use it. I really appreciate the work. — Tom(T2ME) 19:43, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tomica Ok! most of the reviews are mixed so far. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 19:50, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but I think Spin and Toronto Sun should be first, then the rest. — Tom(T2ME) 19:54, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Spin has seven editors with different opinons in the article. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 20:05, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 1 February

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Writers for Pillow Talk

Hi would you be able to edit the Pillow Talk page to amend the writers info! There are only 3 registers writers. Zayn , Michael , and Anthony. I am a representative from Sony ATV music Publishing and we have two of the writers ATVformusic (talk) 17:46, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We still need a Reliable source, published on internet. Otherwise, it would be original research. Please, if the credits can be published somewhere (reliable) so we just link, it would be helpful. There is not source for the writers yet. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 18:55, 2 February 2016 (UTC)I will try and get a label copy upladed thank you for doing that[reply]
ATVformusic https://www.ascap.com/Home/ace-title-search/index.aspx , search Pillowtalk. 5 writers. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 00:11, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please can you revert the writers back to the 5 as there is no evidence suggesting there are only 3 writers. ASCAP and PRS have confirmed the 5 writers that are registered.

Thank you!

The Original Barnstar
Hi! Just wanted to thank you with the original barnstar for all your great work on Zayn articles! :)

Upcoming Meghan articles

Would you like to help me expand Draft:Thank You (Meghan Trainor album) and Draft:No (Meghan Trainor song)?--MaranoFan (talk) 18:49, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

sure! Cornerstonepicker (talk) 19:05, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

IKWYDLS

Hey, I tried playing smart with my little knowledge of coding and accidentally almost messed up IKWYDLS's page. Would you mind adding the Platinum certification? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Victoriagomezv (talk • contribs) 13:47, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Victoriagomezv But is not on RIAA's website yet riaa.com/gold-platinum/ , where did you read that? Cornerstonepicker (talk) 14:37, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It was announced on a press release from Island Records regarding Shawn's world tour. Doesn't RIAA update once a week? It should be up soon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Victoriagomezv (talk • contribs) 17:00, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Here it is: http://www.riaa.com/gold-platinum/?tab_active=default-award&ar=SHAWN+MENDES&ti=I+KNOW+WHAT+YOU+DID+LAST+SUMMER — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.6.21.174 (talk) 16:50, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Finally, gotta update Cornerstonepicker (talk) 16:52, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gold in Denmark: https://twitter.com/CamilaStats/status/712671764174794753 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.14.177.57 (talk) 16:34, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Credit

Label copy source: http://www.nowmusic.com/now-93-info — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.152.61.25 (talk) 17:05, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ASCAP and PRS have confirmed there are 5 writers on the song. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.152.59.110 (talk) 23:10, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I will contact ASCAP Monday for the confirmations!! Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by ATVformusic (talk • contribs) 01:01, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We publish two of the writers on this song! We have the label copy also!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by ATVformusic (talk • contribs) 00:35, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ATVformusic That should be on the internet, so we can cite the source. Otherwise, ASCAP remains the main source. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 00:37, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

They are credited but not writers!! Thank you ATVformusic (talk) 00:19, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ATVformusic Do you a source (reliable publication) that proves otherwise? Cornerstonepicker (talk) 00:21, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pandora.com

The website is only available in US, Australia and New Zealand, but the other countries cannot view it. Is a reliable source? 123.136.111.147 (talk) 02:01, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For what exactly? Cornerstonepicker (talk) 02:03, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Zacharylernersin

You deleted the reviews that I put under TLOP because you said that they weren't "music publications", but they're just as much music publications as the NYT is!!

Complex and Noisey are completely legitimate as just music publications, and the person who wrote the Noisey review also writes for Pitchfork

All the other reviews are from legitimate websites/magazines that have been known to write reviews all the time, idk why they shouldn't be added

the GQ review is even referenced in the Composition portion of the page! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zacharylernersin (talk • contribs) 00:28, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Zacharylernersin: you wrote an entire paragraph for each review. Please, check Metacritic for "acclaim" and "positive reviews", they list each review they have considered. If you already have like 20 relevant reviews, why would you add more (specially from those magazines)? Cornerstonepicker (talk) 01:38, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Work from Home

Hey there. Could you upload the artwork for "Work from Home"? It's here [1]. --Eurofan88 (talk) 15:03, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

k, I will do it later Cornerstonepicker (talk) 15:15, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong number on awards received by Eminem

Hi and thanks for your edit but you told me to tell you what article have a wrong number to fix it. Well if you go to List of awards and nominations received by Michael Jackson, you will find that he received 785+ awards. But when I checked the HTML code (1) (2) (3) (4) there was only 363 awards (I am 99% sure about that). Even List of awards and nominations received by Justin Bieber you will find that he received 136 awards. But when I checked the HTML code (1) (2) (3) (4) there was only 69 awards (I am 99% sure about that). And I am sure that there is more pages that have the same thing, what I am trying tell you is not that all artists have a wrong number on their pages but is the amount of received awards by Eminem before you edit it (346) is probably right. Maybe 346 is the actual amount of awards received by Eminem but the author did not mention all the awards, Maybe 785+ is the actual amount of awards received by Michael Jackson but the author did not mention all the awards, Maybe 136 is the actual amount of awards received by Justin Bieber but the author did not mention all the awards. So I think it is a good idea to change the number back to 346 on Eminem's page. And yes I'm an Eminem fan. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eliasyoussef47 (talk • contribs) 22:27, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Eliasyoussef47: You can't just show a list of 120 awards and then put the artist has won "346" awards without proving it. Not even with a (reliable) source. Remember, WP only lists notable awards per WP:INDISCRIMINATE. I fixed MJ numbers; and Bieber used "rowspan=4 {{won}}" when he wins four awards in a row, so counting it with f3 won't help, it has to be counted manually. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 22:49, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You (Meghan Trainor album)

It is eligible for WP:DYK. But only till tomorrow. If you want, please nominate it now. I don't have the time. You can use [2] as an example.--MaranoFan (talk) 12:59, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@MaranoFan: Am I late? Can't think of a hook for Thank you Cornerstonepicker (talk) 16:46, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Just create it with any hook you want. Alt hooks can be added.--MaranoFan (talk) 17:40, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@MaranoFan: done check Cornerstonepicker (talk) 18:32, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank YOU SOO MUCH.--MaranoFan (talk) 19:57, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Kiyanu Kim" / "KIM DAVID KYUNGIL"

I think that someone hacked into music publishing website as a songwriter "KIM DAVID KYUNGIL" [3]. However in Complex magazine: " "Wrecking Ball"—a team of five songwriters did: Lukasz Gottwald, Maureen Anne McDonald, Stephan Moccio, Sacha Skarbek, and Henry Russell Walter."

123.136.106.23 (talk) 14:12, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Check Bangerz booklet, (IMO) BMI and ASCAP are not 100% reliable. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 20:32, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
For your continuous work to keep Meghan Trainor articles up to par. MaranoFan (talk) 08:44, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Dangerous Woman (album)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Dangerous Woman (album), Cornerstonepicker!

Wikipedia editor Garagepunk66 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I enjoyed reading the article on the upcoming album Dangerous Woman by Ariana Grande. Very nicely done.

To reply, leave a comment on Garagepunk66's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Please help

Please help me listing "Focus" as a single from Dangerous Woman. I have a reliable source (http://www.fuse.tv/2016/03/ariana-grande-new-album-complete-guide), but there is an anonymous user keeps reverting my edits. Please help me! Thx. U990467 (talk) 18:15, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It keeps reverting my edits on Dangerous Woman (album) with no reason. Please help!!(talk) 18:21, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@U990467: comment on the Talk page to avoid WP:EDITWAR Cornerstonepicker (talk) 18:24, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@U990467: don't forget your point of view would be a better comment. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 18:28, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I get it.(talk) 18:36, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It reverts my edits again. How can I stop it? It almost makes me crazy....(talk) 12:36, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 3rd iHeartRadio Music Awards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NCAA March Madness (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Impact section for "Anti"

Why no student newspapers?

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacobpotash (talk • contribs) 17:57, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Jacobpotash: because those aren't professional publications per WP:MUSIC/SOURCES. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 20:07, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FAC: Maxinquaye

Hi there. Since you're an active contributor to music articles on Wikipedia, would you be interested in offering a review or comment at my FAC for the article Maxinquaye? Dan56 (talk) 17:10, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Writing credits on See You Again (Wiz Khalifa song)

Since additional songwriters have been registered but misplaced on database per WP:Songs 123.136.107.177 (talk) 22:47, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Thank You (Meghan Trainor album)

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 13:57, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited IHeartRadio Music Awards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drake (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been invited to join the Meghan Trainor WikiProject, a WikiProject on the English Wikipedia dedicated to improving articles and lists related to Meghan Trainor. If you are interested in joining, please visit the project page and add your name to the list of participants. Thank You.

Welcome!

Welcome to the Meghan Trainor WikiProject! We are very pleased to have your help with the project. If you have not done so yet, it is strongly recommended that you add all the Meghan Trainor pages to your watchlist. If you have any inquiries regarding the project, or any articles relating to Meghan Trainor, please direct them to the project's talk page. Alternately, you could also bring up a discussion on the article's own talk page, or message a fellow participant, but we would prefer all participants engaging on the project's own talk page. If you find yourself inactive with the project for an extended period of time, feel free to remove yourself, or just add yourself to the inactive participants section. Thank you and happy editing!

Great work on Fifth Harmony

You're doing a nice job making Fifth Harmony's article into a well written article rather than a fan information page, which is easy that it gets since it's basically only fans willing to edit its page. Keep up the good work // Psemmler (talk) 13:17, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Psemmler: thanks! tho I may reach 3RR in order to stop some fan and his messy edits. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 16:24, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lemonade

Hi, why are you reverting my edits on Lemonade? I provided a source, so unless you can provide a source proving my statement to be false, I don't see why you are removing it. I updated it just now, with another source claiming it could be just a 48-hour Tidal-exclusive, so it is more neutral. 73.81.159.74 (talk) 03:26, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Great: that's how you add information. When is not confirmed, cite the source there. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 03:27, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dangerous Woman

Why did you revert my edits on "Dangerous Woman"? The page says the song was praised, and all of the reviews are positive. Do people have a thing against Ariana because of "Focus"? Like, I don't get it. It clearly received acclaim. 166.170.34.148 (talk) 21:28, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please, read WP:ORIGINALSYN. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 21:30, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Positive reviews are not equal to praise, or acclaim. See the dictionary for clarification. Toddst1 (talk) 21:32, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

When has a song page on Wikipedia ever had a source specifically say "This song received acclaim", or something like that? That is bull. 166.170.34.148 (talk) 21:37, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the page says "Critics praised...", so it WAS praised. Stop being so pressed about this. You guys are so stubborn. 166.170.34.148 (talk) 21:38, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I use the "best songs of the year" lists for that. Btw, "Critics praised" shouldn't be like that. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 21:47, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Please see my comments at Template:Did you know nominations/Can't Stop the Feeling Snuggums (talk / edits) 14:01, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@SNUGGUMS: Is it ok to replace one of them? Cornerstonepicker (talk) 17:45, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. Any hooks used must be supported within article body and adequately referenced without any copyright violations or close paraphrasing. Provide new hooks on that page or be sure the ones already given are sufficiently supported with a mention in the article itself. Snuggums (talk / edits) 18:22, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Can't Stop the Feeling!

On 23 May 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Can't Stop the Feeling!, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that that Justin Timberlake's "Can't Stop the Feeling!" became the 26th song in history to debut at No. 1 on the U.S. Billboard Hot 100? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Can't Stop the Feeling!. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Can't Stop the Feeling!), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Taylor Swift's "Legacy" section topic

Hi! Just wanna inform you that I deleted your reply regarding Taylor's musical influence to other artists specifically Troye Sivan and Camila Cabello. You reasoned out that they were just being fans and so I researched more about it and I found solid evidences that Taylor Swift is one of their musical influence. Here you can check them out:

Thanks! Mat 1997 (talk) 14:30, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Mat 1997: Yeah, you didn't have to delete it. Just reply showing the reasons. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 16:03, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If you didnt notice, I added Cassadee Pope and Kelsea Ballerini on the artists that were influenced by Taylor. They were both country artists. Check their articles too. Mat 1997 (talk) 03:39, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hi~ Can you review Ariana Grande discography? This list is a current featured list candidate. I think it meets the criteria and should be a featured list. If you are willing to review the list, you can click here. Thank you. --U990467 (talk) 12:44, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi U990467, as other editor commented there, I think it should go through WP:PRG (the place for feedback) first before FL. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 18:56, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, it has already gone through peer review. SchroCat was aiming my earlier statement, which I later changed. Totally, the page is now well-referenced and well-written. --U990467 (talk) 08:11, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of songs recorded by Justin Timberlake

The new format for this page and the deleting of songs and featured artists left and right... *sigh* Where should I begin...? Bryan McLaude (talk) 01:16, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Bryan McLaude: just like Featured-Article List of songs recorded by Katy Perry. what songs did I delete? Cornerstonepicker (talk)

The format is pretty much fine really. I think I just liked the previous format as it was, so I found the change a bit unexpected but it still gets the job done and your making sure the information is being presented accurately and as is. I also have to thank you for your suggestions regarding how to add the additional vocal artists on the 'Justified' album tracks in like a Notes section. As for the deleted song, it was "Where Is The Love?" by The Black Eyed Peas, but I know since Justin is not officially credited I guess the song can't be officially considered his, despite his featured vocals. That's alright though. Bryan McLaude (talk) 05:54, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Bryan McLaude: Yeah, he was nominated for a Grammy as a vocalist for the song, but he wasn't credited when it charted, on the album tracklist or elsewhere. Btw, I moved the uncredited stuff to notes already, if you could find a source to support it would be ready. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 06:31, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Justified Notes section

Just checked out the Notes section you did for the additional vocal artists; very good job. I like it much better and presents the information just as the official release did. Bryan McLaude (talk) 15:23, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Drake revision

Why are you repeatedly reverting the edits I have made on the Drake page? I have provided sources and list information primarily from a neutral stance, without violating any Wikipedia guideline. What is the reasoning? PsychopathicAssassin (talk) 19:50, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@PsychopathicAssassin: I have explained why several times, even in your Talk page, which you ignored and continued with disruptive edits and non-sense edit summary. With two sources of positive reviews you can't say "critical success" or "widespread success" (WP:SYN), the feuds you "sourced" are not encyclopedic (WP:INDISCRIMINATE, and was already removed weeks ago per Discussion). Among others. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 19:23, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Cornerstonepicker: The usage of "critical success" and "widespread success" was only written due to articles like Kanye West, (a good article-certified article, might I add) using the language on positive reviews with NO sources prevalent in the top of the page. I had also improved the references about the feuds, taking them from viable sources, rather than fan made websites. It would now be nonsensical to revert the edits. PsychopathicAssassin (talk) 21:31, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@PsychopathicAssassin: Keep in mind Kanye's article is backed with Metacritic claiming critic acclaim and Rolling Stone 500 best albums of all time. That's not Drake case. Those feuds have already been removed per Discussion, because they aren't encyclopedic. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 20:52, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Cornerstonepicker: Drake also has Metacrtic claim, whilst his albums have repeatedly topped lists fitting of critical acclaim, as well as his albums seeing a large amount of commercial success. The feuds have been reported by reputable outlets, and can be described as encyclopedic. The removal is illogical. PsychopathicAssassin (talk) 22:01, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@PsychopathicAssassin: No, this is the album you keep adding is critical acclaimed Metacritic: generally favorable reviews; this is Kanye's Universal acclaim Universal acclaim. Amount of commercial success, you posted "widespread commercial success", not backed with a source claiming that, totally falling on original research and WP:SYN. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 21:07, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Edit: please, don't re-add your content until both discussions reach a conclusion. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 21:17, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Cornerstonepicker: @PsychopathicAssassin: I figured I'd give some outside input on this. I agree with Cornerstonepicker that the addition of the phrase "critical success" was WP:SYN based on the sources that were cited. I have removed this portion from the article. Commercial success I believe can remain because the billboard link shows the backing for that. I hope this helps add some clarity. Dane2007 (talk) 21:31, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Justin Timberlake

Hello! I have added an award to this article but I can not give a proper summary about it. Can you take a look into it? I added an old issue of Billboard magazine as the reference. Its even there in the Grammy Awards site. Ref: 1 Ref: 2

Thanks. King Cobra (talk) 20:25, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@6033CloudyRainbowTrail: I saw the article some time ago, but I didn't know the name of the award. I couldn't find more sources to write a summary. I'll search again to expand. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 20:58, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:2016 MTV VMAs logo.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:2016 MTV VMAs logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:17, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Sfan00 IMG: It's ok, there's a new version of the image uploaded by other user currently used in the article. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 14:15, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Amy Schumer Awards

Hi there, again! I was wondering if you would be able to make a separate page for Amy Schumer's awards? I think she has enough awards/nominations for a separate page to be made for her. I would do it myself, however, I don't know how to. Thank you Lovatc543 (talk) 00:14, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Lovatc543: for some reason, comedians/TV host (Jimmy Fallon, James Corden) always have the list of their awards included in their main article. However, you can start Schumer's article of her awards and nominations using List of awards and nominations received by Ellen DeGeneres as a main example (copy/paste and replace names). You'll surelly find support for the frequent editors on Schumer's article to keep the new one in WP. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 03:27, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Doubt

Hello,

I was wondering if you can help with the sentences about critical reception that I need to add at the top of some articles that I contributed, because you used the WP:SYN as the reason to take them away completely, but I was looking for some articles that you contributed as well, and you used the WP:SYNTH to take few information about the critics, but not all of them, such as Katy Perry's "Wide Awake", where the sentence "'Wide Awake' garnered mostly favorable critiques from music journalists, who commended its production" is still there, or the Justin Timberlake's "Drink You Away" and Meghan Trainor's "Lips Are Movin" articles, where the critical information is intact. For instance, Rihanna's "Kiss It Better" article has nothing more about the critical reception, not even a sentence, same as all of the Justin Bieber's songs that I revamped, such as "Sorry" and "Company", where the only information were "Music critics mostly were complimentary about its tropical vibe and Bieber's vocals" and "Music critics were mostly complimentary about the R&B environment" respectively. Even the featured article "Single Ladies (Put a Ring on It)" does not have the reception part at all, where all the content was "Most music critics praised the song's smooth production and some noted its similarity to Beyoncé's 2007 single 'Get Me Bodied'. How those statements are different than "critics stated that 'Lips Are Movin' elevated Trainor from a one-hit wonder to a successful pop act"? or "'Drink You Away' received generally positive response from contemporary critics, with some of them labeling the song as a highlight and one of the most impressive moments on the album."? These are not WP:SYNTH too? So how come the reception part not being featured in selected articles, but in some they are intact? Best regards, FanofPopMusic (talk) 22:07, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
For your most recent contributions to the Trolls soundtrack! Very much appreciated! :) Carbrera (talk) 22:39, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Demi lovato main section

Hi there! I was wondering if you could please add "model" to Demi's main page. she signed to Whilelmina modeling last October. it was there but then someone took it off of her page. thanks!! Lovatc543 (talk) 06:00, 15 August 2016 (UTC) Lovatc543 (talk) 06:00, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lovatc543 There's an issue with that, she's not known/notable as a model. Lead section and infobox are for main occupations. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 02:34, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited MTV Video Music Award for Video of the Year, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Formation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:14, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Side to side

Both "Side to Side" and "Side To Side" are completely blocked for ONE YEAR and can't be edited now. What should I do? U990467 (talk) 16:07, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Since we're talking about this article (note that the "Side to Side (song)" is blocked until DECEMBER, when the song will probably be over), I also got a question. Now, the song has entered the Hot 100 and others notable charts, as well its video released and a notable live performance. I still don't understand the reason for the block (probably a war edition). Do you know some user who can unblock the page or do you agree with the block? Music01 (talk) 00:06, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Encore: Movie Partners Sing Broadway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Madonna (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:31, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lady Gaga - Emmy Award win

Hi there! lady gags just won an Emmy for her son Til It Happens To You for The Hunting Ground. I was wondering if you could add her nomination/win to the Emmy section on her awards page. I would do it, only I am unable to. thanks! Lovatc543 (talk) 03:11, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've read only Diane Warren was credited as a winner @Lovatc543:. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 05:23, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sia - The Greatest

Hey. I see you reverted my edit of the top section under WP:SYN, which is absolutely true, and kind of fine, as long as one might find an acceptable way to mention the 2016 Orlando nightclub shooting in this section, regarding the song's direct connection with it. Feedback? ChrisMartinYoung (talk) 22:23, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@ChrisMartinYoung: None from Sia's team has confirmed the song/video is about the shooting. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 19:18, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Screenshot

Hello, I noticed you are removing a screenshot from the video of Heathens on its article, I find it unnecessary, it's simply a screenshot of the video. Thanks for reading. EthanRossie2000 (talk) 24 September 2016

@EthanRossie2000: it is not "just a simply screenshot". I don't think you understand WP strong policies regarding copyright. Please, read WP:NFCCP. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 19:16, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sia; artistry and Lead

Hi. When I looked at the ref for Sia's musical styles, I saw that it did not support the assertion at all. I think that what the article says about her style is basically true, but we need to find refs that verify the assertion. Do you see any good sources to use? All the best! -- Ssilvers (talk) 02:26, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Ssilvers: I searched everywhere and there's no info about it. I think that was original research. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 03:09, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Well, let's wait awhile. I am sure that in some interviews, or in some articles about Sia's music, we can find more about her style. -- Ssilvers (talk) 03:28, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Illuminate (Shawn Mendes album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Idolator (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:03, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cornerstonepicker. You have new messages at FanofMusic's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Lemonade Song Covers

I noticed that you reverted several of my edits to songs from Lemonade (Beyoncé album). What would you deem as having a song cover "published"? They were in the CD booklet, just as the covers for "Hold Up" and "Freedom", and yet you haven't reverted those covers. Additionally, they were also published on Beyoncé's official website Beyoncé.com. Thanks, TheKaphox T 22:23, 21 October 2016 (UTC):[reply]

@TheKaphox: can you give me the link @ her website where the covers are? Btw, I did revert the other covers, and you added them again. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 14:36, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Cornerstonepicker: My apologies, I didn't realise that someone had already added an image for the single cover. I just thought that the article didn't have one, so thought that I ought to include it. The single covers are on found here on Beyoncé's website. TheKaphox T 14:39, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@TheKaphox: you're just assuming those are the official covers, seems those are photos from the music videos. Look at "Formation", that isn't the official cover. Not on iTunes, or on an streaming service. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 14:45, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Cornerstonepicker: I have a physical copy of the album Lemonade. The images listed there are the images that are included in the official liner notes of the CD. This makes me think that they are the official covers. TheKaphox T 14:50, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@TheKaphox: I know they are featuring in the liner notes, but you're still assuming those are the single covers. It should be removed until a source says "single cover", if there isn't anything on the music services I mentioned before. Again, that isn't the "Formation" cover. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 15:46, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"No one else is linked"

Dear fellow editor,
The purpose of the present message is to learn from you, not to challenge; so, thank you for reading it in the spirit in which it was written. In this revert, your edit summary implies that: either all listed names should have been linked, or none of them.
This intrigued me because I was unaware of this guideline; I therefore consulted MOS:LINK and also MOS:LIST, but couldn't find an appropriate guideline. I would therefore be very grateful if you would point me to the relevant guideline, whenever convenient. Thank you very much, in advance, for your helpful assistance.
With kind regards;
Patrick. ツ Pdebee.(talk)(guestbook) 15:28, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Beyoncé Award Main Image

Hey! Seeing as you seem a bit more adept to Wikipedia than I am, and involved in the "List of awards and nominations received by Beyoncé" page, I was wondering if you could help me out? Is it possible to have a new main image for the page? The previous one is now 7 years old. I'm not overly sure or confident enough to replace the image myself, but I was thinking an image from Beyoncé's recent sweep at the 2016 VMA awards? Maybe this one: http://www.marieclaire.com/celebrity/news/g4004/beyonce-vma-outfits/?slide=2 It'd be much appreciated! Angelic-alyssa (talk) 11:14, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Angelic-alyssa:, that image cannot be added to Commons unless it is freely licenced, and it's pretty clear that isn't. It would be better to choose a photo that is already on Commons, than attempt to get a photo you find on the internet uploaded there, as such an image is likely to be copyrighted and copyrighted material is not allowed in WP. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 20:01, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Cornerstonepicker:, thanks very much for your response. I appreciate the assistance. Angelic-alyssa (talk) 23:23, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Grande

Routine calculations are NOT synth. See Wikipedia:No original research#Routine calculations. This simple arithmetic from uncontroversial sources that simply total up numbers disclosed by and official counter. -- Ssilvers (talk) 17:45, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Ssilvers: My bad, didn't see Youtube channels have data showing the total views. I added "combined", so people can understand all the videos are counted. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 19:27, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Album ratings

Hi again. Would you be willing to weigh in this RfC regarding AnyDecentMusic? should be added in the album ratings template like Metacritic, because the website is another review aggregator. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 00:18, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Roman's Revenge

Hi. I noticed that, on the "Roman's Revenge" article, you reverted my edit claiming that the single wasn't supported by any source. The single is in fact the official cover, as per Spotify and iTunes. I have re-added the single cover to the article. Thanks, TheKaphox T 18:06, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'ts ok, you should've stated that in the field "source". However, that's the cover of The Lil Wayne remix, which is the single version, not the album track that features Eminem. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 18:55, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Sorry" and "Freedom" covers

I do know that the artworks are derived from her liner notes, but I actually checked to see if they are the official artwork, and they turned out to be the official artwork. Although I admit that I derived it from a rather unreliable website (Josepvinaixa), the blogger had noted that they derived it from the record label (because I've seen him labelling if it is a fanmade cover too). I can't seem to actually find the actual source, but it seems legitimate. Cheers, Nahnah4 (talk | contribs | guestbook) 08:12, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Nahnah4: Where did you check those are the official covers? Those are stills from the music videos, check the 'cover' for "Formation". Isn't the official. We can't just assume. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 19:26, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rihanna's Webby Awards

I will be reverting your recent edit on the List of awards and nominations received by Rihanna. Billboard and Entertainment Weekly announced that Rihanna was the nominee. Please refer to the articles below:

Besides, ANTIdiary is Rihanna's only project to be nominated on the Webby Awards. Mat 1997 (talk) 02:24, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Shawn Mendes

Can you please keep an eye on the article? Destiny Leo (talk) 05:27, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Under Pressure

Hey can you help me by having this in pose, because it only had three publications on the list, I think it's necessary having it in pose. Thank you. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 16:18, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this edit I should have do it myself, but I not a very good editor, so that's why I ask you in the first place. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 00:35, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No problem Cornerstonepicker (talk) 06:40, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Cornerstonepicker. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Daddy Lessons as a single.

Hey, Cornerstonepicker Daddy Lessons was not a single. It was not sent out to radio. These sources show All Night as the 5th single and 4th in the US. [1] [2] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gishmuya (talk • contribs) 22:08, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Gishmuya: As I told you in Lemonade's Talk page, there's no way Direct Lyrics or Idolator are better sources than iTunes itself. It doesn't need to be send to radio in order to be a single. It is a single (stand-alone release) on iTunes and Spotify. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 17:32, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ http://www.idolator.com/7651811/beyonce-all-night-next-single-lemonade
  2. ^ http://www.directlyrics.com/beyonce-selects-all-night-as-next-lemonade-single-you-happy-news.html

Side to Side

Did you want to check the recent chart edits. I've already hit my 3 reverts for the day. I don't know if it is the same editor using different IP's inflating numbers or if my charts haven't updated and everyone else is putting out the right numbers. Kellymoat (talk) 19:23, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Kellymoat: This edit added false numbers, but this is correct, I just checked the current charts. I'll keep an eye on it either way. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 19:43, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
When I click the references posted within the charts, I am still seeing my numbers. I even made a few clicks on the site to get to the actual chart instead of the artist chart and still see my numbers. It's only two or three that are different. But, like I said, I've already done 3 reverts and don't want to continue doing it if it is a refresh issue.

7/27

Why did you revert my edit saying this is an unreliable source? http://www.horapoptv.com.br/single-post/2016/06/29/Fifth-Harmony-recebe-placa-de-platina-pelas-vendas-do-727-no-Brasil It has a picture of 5H holding their platinum plaque, how much more reliable can you get? The Brazil certifications website is far more unreliable, as it often doesn't update. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cookies32895i4 (talk • contribs) 04:25, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Cookies32895i4: Would a random blog with that picture be accepted as well? How is the Brazil cert website more unreliable when it's the Official source? Cornerstonepicker (talk) 07:20, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dark Sky Paradise

Me asking you again to have this in pose, because I'm not sure a table for only four publications is not enough. Thank you. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 17:22, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this edit. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 21:47, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
But when I look at this source, it's a mid-year list, not a year-of-end list, I'm sure you can fix it. Thanks. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 22:03, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Don't worry, I got it. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 22:48, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

JTimberlake

I have added an award requested by a user sometime ago. Ref:1 2 3 I have not added any descriptions.

King Cobra (talk) 16:25, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I'll see if I can add descrps. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 21:03, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Business & Pleasure

Hi, I'm not sure if you are a fan of Azealia Banks or even know who she is - it is highly evident that you did not check the sources thoroughly. Azealia Banks herself has confirmed these sources, as well as the release date. You should check her Twitter for more information instead of automatically deleting an article about an album that was announced nearly 3 years ago. Banks has also confirmed the recorded songs numerous times-therefore the source that provided the songs was correct. Thanks. Wizardofoz30

@Wizardofoz30: There's a reason why WP only works with WP:RELIABLE SOURCES, if none of them have reported about it, is for a reason. Some random Twitter account owned by unknown people and that unreliable website are not WP material.. wait until the album is released to consider it notable/encyclopedic. It is also failing WP:TOOSOON. You may be a fan of hers, but this is not a fan blog. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 05:51, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Chasing Cameron

Hi, I was wondering if you could help me improve this article. There are a lot of people who are vandalizing the article and not referencing. I would really appreciate it. Thanks! Wizardofoz30 —Preceding undated comment added 02:12, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See Talk:How Far I'll Go

If you don't reply soon, I'm reverting the article back. And I suggest actually watching Moana first in English and reviewing the transcript of the Miranda interview before you reply. It looks much better when your opinions are based on the actual content at issue. --Coolcaesar (talk) 21:05, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Normani Kordei

Hey there. Don't delete her page because she's about to be Dancing with the Stars and her dance scores will be added weekly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Afterpartylaur (talk • contribs) 08:02, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Picture used in article Dangerous Woman (album)

Hello! (I don't found any "talk" page so I decided published here). Then, you removed the picture added upon the article of Dangerous Woman album. That picture is on album's liner notes, so its licensed and the photo of Fifth Harmony is present in the group's official site and social media. Can you tell me how add an acceptable "license" in both pictures? Thanks for attention. LikeGaga '(Talk)' 02:15 5, March 2017 —Preceding undated comment added 03:15, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@LikeGaga: A picture you normally find in websites have copyright and are not free to be used on WP Commons. This is an example of a licensed picture. In fact, users in Commons tend to use files made available under the CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. This is an example of the latter. Copyright is an important issue to WP. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 04:23, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

JTimberlake

Hello, again. I added one more award. But, no info.

King Cobra (talk) 22:24, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Liam-payne-strip-that-down.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Liam-payne-strip-that-down.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism on Halo article

Hi. A user vandalized the Halo song article changing Kelly Clarkson's accusation about Already Gone to some joke about Kanye West. Im still new to Wikipedia and don't know how to change it back. I was hoping you can help. Kind regards Andrea353 (talk) 18:00, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds Good Feels Good

Hi. In regards to refer to the aforementioned genres in a precise manner. NME Review says "‘Sounds Good Feels Good’ is obviously more pop than punk", which sounds a little too vague. 183.171.183.81 (talk) 14:46, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Slide" genre(s)

Hi User:Cornerstonepicker, I sourced all the genres on Slide (Calvin Harris song) myself a while back, but knowing what I know now I'm not sure whether the song is being called these genres or the production of the song is. Since you make important edits to many music articles, can you please take a close look at the sources and let me know if you think they're worded in a way that makes it acceptable for them to be used as genres? Here [4], [5], [6], thanks.--Theo Mandela (talk) 04:13, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Theo Mandela: personally, I avoid using Forbes contributors as references for music genres, critical reception, and that stuff, per WP:PUS. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 05:09, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ok User:Cornerstonepicker, overall do you think any genres need to go or the sources specifically call the song these genres? Thanks. --Theo Mandela (talk) 05:44, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
yeah I think "Pop", "funk" and "nu disco" are properly sourced. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 17:47, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks User:Cornerstonepicker, is this just because you don't see Forbes as reliable, or do you think they're not directly calling this song R&B and pop? I'm concerned that "production... that blends..." doesn't equate to this song being R&B and pop, thanks again.--Theo Mandela (talk) 10:15, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Theo Mandela: Both. I don't see Forbes contributors as reliable. The magazine/website has its own staff and also contributors. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 00:58, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Instruction (song)

Hi User:Cornerstonepicker, just letting you know a new song article has been created for "Instruction". It's released to streaming on Friday, any edits you can make would be a great benefit :)--Theo Mandela (talk) 22:19, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Progress/Fifth Harmony

I have edited multiple Fifth Harmony articles, rewriting and fixing up the songs and awards section. The only problem I face is the limited amount of pictures that I can use to expand their main article. Is there a way where a recent picture of the group can be legally uploaded to Commons?

Also, are my edits presentable to the common reader? I do not want to sound like a typical-fan editing with no reliable source or poorly-written grammar. Thanks. De88 (talk) 08:01, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@De88: I do believe the intro section for Fifth Harmony discography is too much; they are just in their second album. Needs to be condensed. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 05:08, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Material you included in the above article appears to have been copied from the copyright web page http://www.thethomascrownchronicles.com/2007_10_01_archive.html. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:43, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Diannaa: It was actually from the Billboard article cited. My bad, forgot to rephrase it. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 16:25, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Current version is ok from a copyright point of view. Thanks for taking the time to do that. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:00, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lauren Jauregui

I'm confused as to why there is a discussion debate on whether or not Lauren Jauregui should have a stand alone article. I understand that each member has done other work outside the group but the other members pages are redirected and cited in the Fifth Harmony members section. To me I feel as though she has not gained notability outside the group. By that I mean her own headline tour, her debut album, her debut movie, TV show and other stuff. She is still touring with the band and has released singles and albums that is with the band hence her still being in the band. The only thing I've seen that she has gained outside the group is colloberating with two other artists on a song and winning an LGBT award. That doesn't surprise me because still is still apart of the group and once she leaves then she might do all the other stuff. To me that does not stand valuable enough to create an article about her. Normani Kordei was on Dancing with the Stars her citation is listed under the member section. Ally Brooke collaborated with other artists her citation information is listed underneath the member section. Dinah Jane has done other work on the side of the but her information is all listed underneath the section. Each member has done side work but their side work does not gain them notability outside the group. Camila Cabello is the only member with an article because she has done some of the stuff I listed above. She is in the process of releasing her debut album. She's released singles and they've charted in many different countries. She's been nominated and won many awards more than just one. To top it all off She left the group and is now a solo artist in that case an article was needed for her but the others not as much. ---WeLcOmEtOtHenEwMiLlEnIuM (Talk) 21:14, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Welcometothenewmillenium: The article is full of Fifth Harmony info and her personal life. I also don't get the point. Ally Brooke also has a new article, with a discussion for deletion. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 21:39, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jamiedwelly

Hi. I have opened an SPI report. Feel free to comment. Destiny Leo (talk) 07:01, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The link isn't working Cornerstonepicker (talk) 17:53, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Many citations, help correct and self-published sources

Please do consider reading these - WP:OVERCITE, WP:PRESERVE and WP:SELFPUB. It's not an issue to have many citations to a sentence unless it gets to where every word has three or four citations. Instead of removing content from an article, consider correcting inaccuracies, while keeping the rest of the content intact. Self-published and questionable sources may be used as sources of information about themselves, usually in articles about themselves or their activities. - TheMagnificentist 04:58, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fetish (Official Single Cover) by Selena Gomez.jpeg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fetish (Official Single Cover) by Selena Gomez.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:58, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Range on "Can't Stop The Feeling!"

Wouldn't that contradict the article for "Mirrors", since it says "(sheet music commonly prints the notes of a melody an octave higher to keep it within the staff)"? And could we say that site is all that reliable? Since he's barely even touches the 6th octave? Every single vocal range video I could find shows he tops out around B5 or C6. -- Telie2222 (talk) 07:06, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Telie2222: The website is sponsored by Music Teachers National Association. "Mirrors" is the first article I read that features that line you're mentioning; I guess it should be removed. Idk where they got that info from. Changing the numbers would be WP:Original Research... unless somewhere in the website says it is indeed written one octave higher. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 20:13, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Maluma

Please stop changing the Maluma article. I've opened a Talk section so you can respond:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Maluma_(singer)#Maluma.27s_influences.3F

AyanP (talk) 19:36, 1 August 2017 (UTC)AyanP[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Cornerstonepicker&oldid=793442221"