Jump to content

Talk:Elise Stefanik

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 2603:3003:3612:fc00:e9d4:458d:94e2:f790 (talk) at 13:05, 27 June 2018 (→‎Edit to Personal Life section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Elise Stefanik. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:12, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Healthcare Section

Hello -- I am a Representative of Congresswoman Stefanik's office and I wanted to discuss having the healthcare section fixed.

Right now, there is a very partisan, incorrect and uncited explanation of a bill she is cosponsoring regarding wellness programs.

This legislation does not eliminate the protections under the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008, which clearly states: "It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer to request, require, or purchase genetic information with respect to an employee or a family member of the employee except - where.... health or genetic services are offered by the employer, including such services offered as part of a wellness program..."

What this legislation does is help provide employers the legal certainty they need to offer employee wellness plans, which would then help promote a healthy workforce and lower healthcare costs for businesses and families. Wellness programs are very popular among the public. Additionally, under this legislation, participation in wellness programs is voluntary and would remain voluntary -- no one would be coerced into giving genetic information.

Thank you for all input in how to address this issue.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.231.249.141 (talk) 19:03, 27 April 2017‎ (UTC)[reply]

Edit to Personal Life section

I would like to request the mention of Stefanik's husband and his employer/occupation be updated.

I want to suggest that "On August 19, 2017, Stefanik married Matthew Manda from Lawrence, Kansas; he is the spokesman for the Independent Journal Review.[65]" be updated to "On August 19, 2017, Stefanik married Matthew Manda from Lawrence, Kansas; he is a communications and marketing vice president at Firehouse Strategies." <ref>http://firehousestrategies.com/our-team-3/ref>

I'd also like to suggest that this line be removed as it is no longer accurate: "He is also Director of Communications for the political consulting firm IMGE,[67] a firm retained by Stefanik's campaign.[68] Both Independent Journal Review and IMGE are divisions of Media Group of America.[69][70]"

2603:3003:3612:FC00:E9D4:458D:94E2:F790 (talk) 13:05, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Soon may not be youngest congresswoman elected

Alexandria_Ocasio-Cortez won the democratic primary in NY's 14th congressional district at age 28 in a heavily leaning democrat district, so she'll likely be congresswoman elect in Novemeber and younger than Stefanik https://www.fastcompany.com/40590408/how-alexandria-ocasio-cortez-a-28-year-old-democratic-socialist-pulled-off-a-stunning-primary-upset?partner=feedburner&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+fastcompany%2Fheadlines+%28Fast+Company%29 Shushugah (talk) 12:54, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Shushugah: - Yeah, and just as soon as Ocasio-Cortez is sworn in JANUARY, someone will be sure to make this update. Presuming Ocasio wins of course. But she's not there yet.
Billmckern (talk) 12:58, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]