Jump to content

User talk:X-Editor

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Tauthanhhuyen34 (talk | contribs) at 04:05, 29 January 2019. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome to my talk page! Feel free to leave a message here, thanks!

Speedy deletion nomination of Concert Properties

Hello 344917661X,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Concert Properties for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Dom from Paris (talk) 23:28, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An extended welcome

Hi 344917661X. Welcome to Wikipedia. I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily.

Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.

If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter.

Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.

I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. --Ronz (talk) 16:48, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Concert Properties, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Development (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stub tags

Please note that {{stub}} goes right at the end of an article -see WP:ORDER. Putting it anywhere else makes life harder for stub-sorters. Thanks. PamD 23:24, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Mount Dennis (disambiguation)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Mount Dennis (disambiguation), 344917661X!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please note that disambiguation pages should only list things that have the same name and are thus likely to be confused, not titles that are merely similar to each other or are partial title matches. The articles Mount Dennis and Mount Denson do not need disambiguation from each other. Also, disambiguation pages should have only one link per bullet point, so that the reader is quickly and accurately conveyed to the correct page. I've removed improper titles, and since this only disambiguates two articles (Mount Dennis is the primary topic, Mount Dennis station is the only other article which might realistically be called "Mount Dennis"), I will nominate this page for speedy deletion, since it functionally duplicates the hatnote at Mount Dennis.

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

--Animalparty! (talk) 21:07, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mount Dennis (disambiguation)

A tag has been placed on Mount Dennis (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

  • disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
  • disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Animalparty! (talk) 21:07, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sunnybrook Stable Fire for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sunnybrook Stable Fire is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunnybrook Stable Fire until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Quek157 (talk) 11:13, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I withdrawn the nomination since you had added all info, I turned it into a redirect. I hope you can expand on things rather than one article, the park itself is not defensible per WP:ROTM and WP:GNG already FYI. --Quek157 (talk) 12:42, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fatblogging (May 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KJP1 was:
This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Sourcing gives no indication that this is a serious topic with anything like significant coverage. Suspect it's actually an advert.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KJP1 (talk) 22:02, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pole Position

You don't need to put MAME or other emulators under ports, per this edit. Practically every arcade game can be played in MAME, so we don't need to mention it. Namcokid47 (talk) 20:10, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I don't know why I added that. 344917661X (talk) 00:37, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ZI Jony was:
This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Draft:Parascenium, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Don't submit duplicate drafts.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Warm Regards, ZI Jony (talk) 00:08, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry about that! I had no idea the other one had been submitted! 344917661X (talk)

HEY

Listen, I understand your saying, but honestly. Your making it very difficult for me to enjoy Wikipedia now. I hope your satisfied with the deletion, but know that people who word comments so rudely that it puts a bad rep on the wiki. I don't even like the game! It was just fun to make an article that was a W.I.P!!!! So thanks, also real original name :( Timwardo (talk) 16:42, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please calm down, I am not trying to be mean to you. I'm just pointing out that your edits were uncyclopedic as metioned in the AFD. Also, the article is getting deleted because there are not enough independent, reliable, secondary sources for it to be on this website, see the nominator's comment on the AFD page for more information. Also, complaining over your edits getting deleted and articles getting deleted is just not worth it. Please listen to what other people have to say before you get mad at people like me. Three of my articles were deleted, but did I whine and complain about it? No, instead, I looked at their point of view and understood why they were doing what they were doing. Wikipedia has rules, and if you don't like them, then leave. Also, you insulting me for wording myself rudely is very hypocritical because you insulted me as well at the end of your comment by making fun of my username. Please do not leave bad faith comments like the ones you left and attack others just because they deleted your edits or articles. If you want to act like that, then this website is not for you. Again, i'm not trying to be rude. 344917661X (talk) 18:10, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

On Ujjawal Krishnam

I strongly believe that article satisfies the minimum criteria of notability and should not be abruptly deleted. Instead, an improvement is needed. Please do take part in AfD. AchaksurvisayaUdvejin (talk) 18:43, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about? I didn't participate in that AfD. I think you're talking to the wrong person. 344917661X (talk) 20:24, June 20 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Parascenium (June 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Firefly was:
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a dictionary. We cannot accept articles that are little more than definitions of words or abbreviations as entries. A good article should begin with a good definition, but expand on the subject. You might try creating a definition for this instead at Wiktionary, which is a dictionary. Please only do so if it meets that sister project's criteria for inclusion. These require among others, attestation for the word or phrase, as verified through clear widespread use, or its use in permanently recorded media, conveying meaning, in at least three independent instances spanning at least a year.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
I would suggest incorporating this content into the entry at Wiktionary.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
ƒirefly ( t · c · who? ) 22:53, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I completely agree, I just submitted it because it was in the 1911 edition of the Encyclopaedia Brittanica and I wanted to see what would happen if I submitted it. 344917661X (talk) 23:27, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Apple Watch Series 4 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Apple Watch Series 4. Since you had some involvement with the Apple Watch Series 4 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 18:24, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ping-O-Tronic has been accepted

Ping-O-Tronic, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

(t) Josve05a (c) 02:46, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

John Francis Fortescue Horner

Last month you added a "Context" banner to the article on John Francis Fortescue Horner. I have just got around to looking at this and wondered if you could explain a little more (perhaps on the article talk page) about what you think is needed?— Rod talk 17:17, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, more is needed in the introduction. 344917661X (talk) 22:22, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I've had a go at expanding the lead, could you take a look and see if this is what you wanted?— Rod talk 08:10, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good. 344917661X (talk) 22:22, 16 July 2018 (UTC) 14:38, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Parascenium (July 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RoySmith was:
The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Theatre of ancient Greece#Characteristics of the buildings. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Theatre of ancient Greece refers to this as a paraskenia. We need to verify which is the correct spelling. Or maybe both are legitimate?
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
-- RoySmith (talk) 18:02, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Please read this notification carefully, it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the blockchain and cryptocurrencies. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

MER-C 11:37, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, thanks! 344917661X (talk) 12:20, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to WikiProject YouTube

September 2018

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Jimmy Wales are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines, not for general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See User:Jimbo Wales on how to contact him. An article talk page is not suitable for this. 5 albert square (talk) 14:28, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As I noted in my edit summary on the page in question, this seems to be a misunderstanding of the valid talk page enquiry that 344917661X made. MPS1992 (talk) 14:32, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the advice, but this does not answer my question as to wether or not this is a reliable source or not. I'll ask the question at the reference desk if none of you are going to answer my question. 344917661X (talk) 14:49, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The reliable sources noticeboard might be better placed to help. MPS1992 (talk) 14:52, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, i'll go there instead. 344917661X (talk) 14:54, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nintendo Switch Pro Controller (September 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Nintendo Switch. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
There is not enough information in this draft to warrant a stand-alone article, but the existing article can be expanded with information from this draft as needed.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 04:14, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Information icon Hello, I'm INeedSupport. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 2017 Atlantic hurricane season have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Why you messed up the subtitles in the article? I highly doubt it was intentional, but please watch out next time. INeedSupport(Care free to give me support?) 19:33, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't try to remove certain text for no reason, I was just trying to convert a url to prevent link rot, but for some reason, I must have accidentally removed certain things that shouldn't have been removed. Sorry about the mistake! 344917661X (talk) 20:51, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Nintendo-Switch-Console-Docked-wJoyConRB.jpg
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Nintendo-Switch-Console-Docked-wJoyConRB.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 20:41, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nintendo Switch Pro Controller (October 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Nintendo Switch Pro Controller instead.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
While more info has been added I agree with the last reveiwer that this data should be used to expand the Nintendo Switch page which lists all the associated gear
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Legacypac (talk) 20:26, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The Wii U Pro Controller has its own article despite it being shorter than my draft, so I don't see why the Nintendo Switch Pro Controller can't have its own article. It's better to have information solely about the pro controller on its own article rather than have a short paragraph overview of the Pro controller on the Nintendo Switch Wikipedia article. 344917661X (talk) 00:17, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nintendo Switch Pro Controller (October 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Whispering was:
The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Nintendo Switch. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
No, changes since article was declined last. There just isn't enough information here to merit it's own article.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Whispering 16:20, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Fitness Boxing has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Fitness Boxing. Thanks! JDoorjam JDiscourse 20:22, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fitness Boxing has been accepted

Fitness Boxing, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

JDoorjam JDiscourse 20:22, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: VideoSport MK2 has been accepted

VideoSport MK2, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 14:38, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shooters Network (November 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JC7V7DC5768 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Need more than press like coverage. Need about a few reliable sources (from newspapers, mags, book) independent of the subject (not press release or SPIP) that is more than a passing mention in each. Once you find these sources, add them and then resubmit. Thank you for your work.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
JC7V-talk 05:36, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The USA Today source is reliable but not independent as it contains material from a interview that Buzzfeed did with the creators of Shooter's Network. See WP:RS for more help. Need more than primary or press releases sources. JC7V-talk 05:41, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Shooters Network has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Shooters Network. Thanks! JC7V-talk 05:37, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Shooters Network has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Shooters Network. Thanks! JC7V-talk 05:42, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fitness Boxing.

I suggest leaving the stuff by the commas like other Wikipedia articles have them sorted. It baffles me how people use their own Wikipedia pages to look indifferent from others, when that is not the case. Administrators need to check it first. Zacharyalejandro (talk) 07:22, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Zacharyalejandro: You are assuming that I said that I am the creator of the article to make it seem as if I am indifferent, but that's not the case. I only said I was the creator because I wanted you to take what I was saying seriously and because I want the article I created to not have any uncited claims. However, I will take your suggestion above about the use of commas and I am sorry for the mistake I made in the article. 344917661X (talk) 19:26, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Also, this comment you left in the edit history,"READ THE REFERENCES BELOW! We don't need multiple same sources when we have multiple sources already stated in one of the paragraphs. Don't use br and /br crap when adding genres." is extremely rude and would likely violate WP:Civil. If you are going to argue with someone on Wikipedia, please refrain from swearing. 344917661X (talk) 19:37, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Specifically, your comment in the edit history of Fitness Boxing violated Rule 1d in identifying incivility. 344917661X (talk) 19:46, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, 344917661X. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, 344917661X. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Fatblogging

Hello, 344917661X. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fatblogging".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 19:59, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Get rid of the draft. I don't plan on improving it. 344917661X (talk) 19:55, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hello (company) has been accepted

Hello (company), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 04:20, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jack Rat Terrier

Hello, 344917661X. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jack Rat Terrier".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 10:08, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: GigLocator (December 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JC7V7DC5768 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Please provide independent, significant coverage in reliable WP:RS sources for this. Company lasted 3 years so may not be notable but follow above advice to prove me wrong.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
JC7V (talk) 04:20, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You support Nintendo?

You support Nintendo for takedown good fangames or not? 178.121.221.177 (talk) 21:33, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I support Nintendo in general, but I do not support them taking down fan games. I hope that answered your question. 344917661X (talk) 23:13, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

San Ignacio Town Airstrip ref improve

Hi 344917661X. I've pulled the refimprove tag from San Ignacio Town Airstrip. It has two stub tags on it already. Shortage of refs is kind of implied by the stub tags. I've searched for refs and there isn't much to find, so if you come up with any on this airport, please add them in. Thanks Cptmrmcmillan (talk) 05:21, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for telling me, I'll see what I can find. 344917661X (talk) 05:26, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Gab (social network); that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Softlavender (talk) 18:28, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I started a consensus on the talk page of the article and the people there seem open to chnaging the text in the lead to more accurately reflect the sources, so I don't think any of the editors really disagree. Thanks for the warning though! 344917661X (talk) 18:34, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wish

Hello. Help improve, expand and copy edit for article Maureen Wroblewitz. Thanks you. Tauthanhhuyen34 (talk) 04:05, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:X-Editor&oldid=880734227"