Jump to content

Talk:Arthur Conan Doyle

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 108.20.114.62 (talk) at 17:34, 4 May 2019 (surname?: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:Vital article

Former good articleArthur Conan Doyle was one of the Language and literature good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 13, 2006Good article reassessmentDelisted

Reflist


Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Arthur Conan Doyle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:25, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Arthur Conan Doyle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:04, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Conan Doyle Estates Ltd vs Sir Arthur Conan Doyle Literary Estate

Two different branches of Doyle decendants continue to claim rights to his legacy.

Sir Arthur Conan Doyle Literary Estate -- https://www.arthurconandoyle.com/copyrights.html -- recounts in some detail their perceived rights and the different branches of litigation.

Conan Doyle Estates Ltd -- https://conandoyleestate.com -- avoids mention of disputes, implies that they are the appropriate agent, and has some lucrative contracts on display.

Both are working to better establish themselves before all of the Doyle works are in the public domain. Doyle Estates Ltd lost a lawsuit with Leslie Klinger, and is presently is suing Sir Arthur Conan Doyle Literary Estate.

I raise this because multple mention of the Doyle estate, such as under Sherlock Holmes pastiche, is ambiguous.

GeeBee60 (talk) 16:41, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What Does Samoa Have to Do with This?

"Robert Louis Stevenson was able, even in faraway Samoa, to recognise the strong similarity between Joseph Bell and Sherlock Holmes..."

Stevenson was *reading* a story containing a fictionalized version of his old friend and recognized it as such. Why is his *physical* distance from the old friend relevant? 24.239.177.111 (talk) 01:04, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

surname?

Wikipedia ought to acknowledge there is disagreement about how to characterize ACD's surname, not decide the debate one way or the other. You might note, for example, that the Encyclopædia Britanica considers his surname "Conan Doyle." Also that his five children were named "X Conan Doyle" and the grave stone of this first wife reads "Louise Conan Doyle." 108.20.114.62 (talk) 17:34, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]