Jennifer Lopez was a Media and drama good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jennifer Lopez, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jennifer Lopez on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jennifer LopezWikipedia:WikiProject Jennifer LopezTemplate:WikiProject Jennifer LopezJennifer Lopez articles
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Latin music (music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and the languages of Ibero-America, see project scope for more details) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latin musicWikipedia:WikiProject Latin musicTemplate:WikiProject Latin musicLatin music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
I'll happily do this for you, but I'm not sure what to change. Could you be more precise and propose your change in an "Please change X to Y" format? Also, if you reply here, add {{ping|L293D}} at the beginning of your reply. Best, L293D (☎ • ✎)20:26, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Quote: The announcement was described as the "role of a lifetime." from news outlets
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Please remove the 307th citation, of Daily Mail; per se a poor unreliable source is inserted into the article, probably crammed into it without checking. This poorly formatted source which, in its integrity intrigues some intruders to slap out off it, there were two wholly detailed RfCs (that is, Request for Comments) 1st RfC, 2nd RfC, which unambiguously (and since the community takes the role over this) states "Daily Mail is an unreliable source, not suitable for inclusion into highly populated articles", that tabloid journal itself is not very much nuanced, containing factual inaccuracies. As is visible in that article (of Daily Mail) there are repeated characters and some possible misinformation crept into it. It has not even been edited or reviewed by their editorial board. It is not even supported by secondary references as WP:SECONDARY says to establish notability. Per those, please remove all the Daily Mail references. Thank you! 2401:4900:1800:B105:1:1:D957:2C5F (talk) 14:17, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Not done: Not many editors will be willing to go through the article with a fine toothed comb in order to remove 9 separate claims all originating from the Daily Mail -- not to mention the re-writing of the text where claim-removal might leave gaping holes in the prose. Unless you're willing to take on that effort yourself and propose the re-written sections here on the talk page, then by all means go right ahead. Otherwise, the continuing inclusion of Daily Mail references, as I'm sure you know from the aforementioned RfC #2, are covered by WP:IAR. Regards, Spintendo 08:09, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Not done: Not many editors will be willing to go through the article with a fine toothed comb in order to remove 9 separate claims all originating from the Daily Mail -- not to mention the re-writing of the text where claim-removal might leave gaping holes in the prose. Unless you're willing to take on that effort yourself and propose the re-written sections here on the talk page, then by all means go right ahead. Otherwise, the continuing inclusion of Daily Mail references, as I'm sure you know from the aforementioned RfC #2, are covered by WP:IAR. Regards, Spintendo 08:09, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
