Jump to content

Talk:Jennifer Lopez

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Robinrobin (talk | contribs) at 02:11, 13 January 2020 ("Citation needed"). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Former good article nomineeJennifer Lopez was a Media and drama good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 7, 2014Good article nomineeNot listed
September 2, 2015Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Former good article nominee

Template:Vital article

"Citation needed"

"Citation needed" for the following statement:
"She was the runner-up but eventually received the role when the winner was unable to accept the job"

this youtube video ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mYbLCb6cw5M Jennifer Lopez Talk About Her Fly Girl Days ) says she was the chosen one
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=51pTRzh4CrQ Robinrobin (talk) 02:11, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 15 April 2018

The net worth has increased recently. It is $360 million+. Here are the sources. The Sun UK - https://www.thesun.co.uk/tvandshowbiz/5754465/j-lo-jennifer-lopez-net-worth-boyfriend-movies-songs/ The Richest - https://www.therichest.com/celebnetworth/celeb/singer/jennifer-lopez-net-worth/ BankRate - https://www.bankrate.com/lifestyle/celebrity-money/jennifer-lopez-net-worth/ 2A02:C7F:223C:7700:A5C1:4544:2B29:EFE1 (talk) 19:56, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll happily do this for you, but I'm not sure what to change. Could you be more precise and propose your change in an "Please change X to Y" format? Also, if you reply here, add {{ping|L293D}} at the beginning of your reply. Best, L293D ( • ) 20:26, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quote: The announcement was described as the "role of a lifetime." from news outlets

Unclear.82.177.40.11 (talk) 20:23, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 31 January 2019

Please remove the 307th citation, of Daily Mail; per se a poor unreliable source is inserted into the article, probably crammed into it without checking. This poorly formatted source which, in its integrity intrigues some intruders to slap out off it, there were two wholly detailed RfCs (that is, Request for Comments) 1st RfC, 2nd RfC, which unambiguously (and since the community takes the role over this) states "Daily Mail is an unreliable source, not suitable for inclusion into highly populated articles", that tabloid journal itself is not very much nuanced, containing factual inaccuracies. As is visible in that article (of Daily Mail) there are repeated characters and some possible misinformation crept into it. It has not even been edited or reviewed by their editorial board. It is not even supported by secondary references as WP:SECONDARY says to establish notability. Per those, please remove all the Daily Mail references. Thank you! 2401:4900:1800:B105:1:1:D957:2C5F (talk) 14:17, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: Not many editors will be willing to go through the article with a fine toothed comb in order to remove 9 separate claims all originating from the Daily Mail -- not to mention the re-writing of the text where claim-removal might leave gaping holes in the prose. Unless you're willing to take on that effort yourself and propose the re-written sections here on the talk page, then by all means go right ahead. Otherwise, the continuing inclusion of Daily Mail references, as I'm sure you know from the aforementioned RfC #2, are covered by WP:IAR. Regards,  Spintendo  08:09, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

How to remove 307th Oyama lamati (talk) 09:20, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

change ((L'Oreal)) to ((L'Oréal)) - — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:541:4500:1760:2def:3f57:4e22:9f46 (talk) 21:44, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Done MadGuy7023 (talk) 21:50, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]