User talk:WWGB
Archive 1. Archive 2. Archive 3. Archive 4. Archive 5. Archive 6. Archive 7. Archive 8. Archive 9. Archive 10. Archive 11. Archive 12 |
My Awards
Extended content
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HI! THANKS FOR THE FEEDBACK! JackGann (talk) 07:11, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
Way to pounce! I went to do this exact edit a minute after you... stop reading my mind! EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 01:16, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
My DYK
Extended content
| ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
On 14 November 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Schoharie limousine crash, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the stretch limousine involved in the recent crash near Schoharie, New York, killing 20, appeared at two vehicle inspections earlier this year with different license plates? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Schoharie limousine crash), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Fame at last...
How does Wikipedia deal with a mass shooting? A frenzied start gives way to a few core editors. No mention of me though:). Nice diagrams, and a quick look at the page histories of shooting incidents will show a core of regular editors.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 17:30, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
HI WWGB, I'm a researcher at Sydney Uni and would like to contact you. I'm not sure how best to do this and hoping this message somehow reaches you....Doctor 17. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doctor 17 (talk • contribs) 08:45, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
Were you aware?
I assume that you have been made aware of this. But, in the event that you were not, I wanted to point it out to you and bring this to your attention. Your name was mentioned in this article: How does Wikipedia deal with a mass shooting? A frenzied start gives way to a few core editors. Thanks. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 23:46, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
A beer for you!
You probably need one about now. Here's hoping for a better year, in particular, one necessitating fewer new articles on terrorist attacks. E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:28, 1 January 2019 (UTC) |
Christchurch mosque shootings
Thanks for keeping the international reactions under control. AIRcorn (talk) 08:51, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
- I wish to add my thanks as well. We are a country in shock trying to come to grips with the horror. NealeFamily (talk) 08:55, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
For your work on Christchurch_mosque_shootings.
Stuartyeates (talk) 08:21, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
Hey, I noticed that you changed my edit on where Milat was imprisoned at, any reason why given he was transferred from Goulburn to Long Bay? Mrbuskin (talk) 06:11, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Mrbuskin: Milat was imprisoned at both centres at various times, so both should be reported. WWGB (talk) 06:17, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- @WWGB: Ok it just reads like he was in two places at once is all. Another thing was his cause of death hasn't been definitively identified yet hence why I just said terminal cancer in the infobox, given that he was suffering from both oesophageal and stomach cancer should we include both in the infobox? Mrbuskin (talk) 06:21, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Ivan Milat
Well, that AfD was quick. I wasn't even aware it existed until just now. That the article is pretty much just copy and pasted from Backpacker murders violates WP:CWW because it's not attributed. I'm surprised nobody mentioned that. --AussieLegend (✉) 23:16, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- @AussieLegend: The decision to allow the article is both annoying and frustrating. Milat has been included in the crimes article for more than 14 years. Then an editor decides to recreate a cut-and-paste bio article when Milat dies, and others think "well, he's Ivan Milat, of course he should have an article." Sad. WWGB (talk) 10:46, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
A bowl of strawberries for you!
Thanks for your work on the GT page! MartiniShaw (talk) 14:47, 29 November 2019 (UTC) |
Lennon's MBE renouncement
Do you have a source that an MBE cannot be removed at the recipient's request? My source has the medal and Lennon's letter rediscovered in the Queen's archives in 2009. Wlmg (talk) 14:58, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Wlmg: It is possible to return an MBE but not to renounce it. This is written up at List of people who have declined a British honour#Renouncing an honour and in the second-last paragraph of John Lennon#1966–1970: Studio years, break-up and solo work. WWGB (talk) 05:07, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Please Don't
Please don't delete sourced material .It's against wikipedia RS. Alex-h (talk) 12:11, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
- Well, the argument is that the source wasn't reliable, so... El_C 12:14, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
I have to note that Alex-h has repeated this distruptive behavior for three times during this week on challenging articles with high visitation. please see that:
- At the first, he emphasized on adding undue weight material is n't supported by RS here and here
- the second one, he was trying to insert material with no RS here and here while he had got warning from me and other
- the third one,he inserted material without RS, when it was reverted because of lack of RS, he reverted it again by mentioning that material with source shouldn't be picked up!! Intersting! as well as he was warned by me
- Using un reliable source (ncr blog)
@El C: they are just examples shows that he don't care about reliabity of sources and attempt to adding povish content into high visitation article. please leave comment. Thanks!Saff V. (talk) 19:13, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
question
regarding 03:30, January 13, 2020 edit/undo of 2020 Baghdad International Airport airstrike "name provides no benefit to reader", I disagree with this. at least to american readers, the name is distinct and piques interest in the man and the situation that led to the attack. incidentally his death was also specifically cited by the u.s. president (though not by name) as one of the reasons for retaliation. seems a good use of 47 characters to me. can you explain to me why it provides no benefit? i am not a frequent editor familiar with all the etiquette, i hope this is appropriate manner to approach this, thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fythrion (talk • contribs) 06:11, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Fythrion: If it is noteworthy that the victim was a U.S. citizen, or that he was Muslim, then that should be included. Many editors believe that the inclusion of non-notable victim names does not benefit the reader. Whether his name was Nawres Waleed Hamid, or something else like Jamaal Ali, would mean nothing to 99.9% of our readership. Thanks for your question and your interest. Regards, WWGB (talk) 08:12, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for your explanation and the edit. I will say though, that the details of his demographic data may be noteworthy to many beyond just his religion. He was an Iraqi, who not only became a naturalized U.S. citizen and had children/family in California, but who then chose to return to Iraq to work with U.S. forces. Only then was he killed by Iranian-allied forces operating in the region, as part of an effort to quell anti-Iran sentiment amongst Iraqis. It's just an unusual set of circumstances overall. Anyhow, thanks for the comment and edit.--Fythrion (talk) 16:47, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
Australia fires - relative size
https://time.com/5758186/australia-bushfire-size/
At least 24 people have been killed as bushfires have burned more than 12 million acres in Australia—an area approximately the size of the U.S. states of Vermont and New Hampshire combined.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/10/world/australia/australia-wildfires-photos.html
Flames have blackened an area the size of Guatemala
https://blog.wwf.ca/blog/2020/01/08/australian-bushfires/
burning more than 10 million hectares — an area the size of Guatemala.
https://globalnews.ca/news/6376571/australia-wildfire-size-canada/
To give perspective, the fires cover a larger area than the provinces of Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island
All the best.
Edgar (talk) 09:26, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Edgar81:. Hi, I notice that all of your cites are from North America. Saying that the destruction is similar in area to Guatemala or Tennessee is meaningless to almost all readers in Europe, Asia, Africa, Oceania ... (including me). If a comparison must be made, at lesst give a range of alternatives from around the world, for example: "roughly the size of South Korea, Iceland or Guatemala". Regards, WWGB (talk) 10:33, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
- @WWGB:. Thanks! Done.Edgar (talk) 10:46, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
- @WWGB:. It's 11.2M hectares now - roughly the size of Liberia, Honduras, Bulgaria or half of UK. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-australia-bushfires/australian-prime-ministers-approval-rating-slumps-as-bushfires-rage-idUSKBN1ZB0OU Feel free to update the article if you will.