User talk:WhoAteMyButter

Welcome!

Hello, WhoAteMyButter! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 01:17, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

December 2019

Hello, I'm Muboshgu. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Talk:Impeachment of Donald Trump have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:08, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh dear! That wasn't meant to happen... Thank you for catching that! I'm not sure how that happened though. Odd. I'll look into it more! Again, thank you. WhoAteMyButter (talk) 22:20, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Derek Pope (May 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Derek Pope and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Derek Pope, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 02:11, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WhoAteMyButter! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 02:11, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

TFA vandal

Hey WAMB, FYI: if you see an IP user vandalise the Today's Featured Article in a style like this, don't warn them, just report them to WP:AIV as the TFA vandal. An unknown person has been vandalising TFA since 1-2 weeks ago every day around 2:00-5:00 (UTC). Deny them any recognition by just reverting them and having them blocked. Trolls love warnings. --MrClog (talk) 12:38, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the heads-up! Might you have a list of exceptions in which a warning need not be handed out, and block immediately? WhoAteMyButter (📬) 21:39, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is a list of long-term abusers although this one is not on there. However, don't bother looking at the list - if you need to know any of them, you'll learn it by experience. --MrClog (talk) 22:32, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification

I think I see where you were confused. You may have thought that I was this IP because both my IP and that IP start with "2601". I'm just doing anti-vandalism patrolling and that's how I came across the attacks from 60.242.199.114. Anyhow, it's probably best if we just ignore the trolls and let them get themselves blocked. :-) 2601:1C0:1:2991:B8E5:4DEF:55C5:3438 (talk) 06:15, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Their IP is 60.242. Yours is 2601. They made an attack on a page, you undid it. Unless IPs are displaying wrongly for me, this is really confusing. WhoAteMyButter (📬│✏️) 06:17, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh well. They just got blocked. WhoAteMyButter (📬│✏️) 06:18, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vinesauce (May 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Social media, reddit and blog sites are not reliable. The article also needs to be heavily cleaned up and formatted like a proper wiki article. Please see WP:MOS

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vinesauce and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Vinesauce, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 04:10, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vinesauce (June 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Calliopejen1 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Right now there are so many junk references that it is difficult to assess notability. If you want to try again (which may well be a waste of time) please reduce the references in this article to only THE MOST HIGH-QUALITY RELIABLE REFERENCES (also reducing the corresponding text so it's only facts that appear in these high-quality reliable references) and resubmit.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vinesauce and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Vinesauce, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:35, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gary Plauché

The word vigilante is neutral because it was a revenge killing. Also the word was in a previous edit but got changed to “justifiable” and was deleted. The short description describes him as a vigilante also. Drained Swamp (talk) 18:57, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I've decided to restore your edit. WhoAteMyButter (📬│✏️) 03:43, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vinesauce (August 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spicy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not a single one of these references are reliable, independent, or significant coverage. Websites for his own events are not independent; Steam groups, forums and twitter are not reliable. WHOIS and twitch statistics sites are just databases.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vinesauce and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Vinesauce, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spicy (talk) 16:37, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the revert

Whatever that IP posted was bad enough an admin deleted it.--MONGO (talk) 06:46, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

African American Vice President Kamala Harris

Hello Mr. Butter,

I did see your message asking why I edited your page on African-American Vice President. For the edit, I removed all mention of Kamala Harris in it.The reason being, that her father Donald J. Harris is at least mixed with Black ancestry and White, making Mrs. Harris at least 1/4 black, thus debunking the fact that Harris is an African American VP pick, unless you account the one-drop rule. Hope you understand, and have a good day/night/afternoon

Picture of Donald Harris: https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fjamaica-gleaner.com%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fstyles%2Fjg_article_image%2Fpublic%2Farticle_images%2F2011%2F03%2F18%2Fluncheonrotaryd20110317rm.jpg%3Fitok%3DD4BTAKAL&f=1&nofb=1

Interview with Donald Harris if desired: https://www.jamaicaglobalonline.com/kamala-harris-jamaican-heritage/

Justanormalgunnafan1na (talk) 03:25, 6 September 2020 (UTC)Justanormalgunnafan1na[reply]

A cupcake for you!

Thank you for reverting non-constructive edits! Wikiffeine •‿• 21:45, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Dobos torte for you!

7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.

To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen (☎) 12:51, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted edits on certain pages because there are many production companies with no blue links being added to several wiki pages. Some companies are uncredited no doubt, but that does not mean that they do not exist. Ignorant deletion is very unbecoming of a responsible editor. Why not remove each and every company which does not have a blue link? Such as - Admiral Pictures, Santana Productions etc. added to several wiki pages.

Please think about this.