User talk:Materialscientist

• If you came here because I reverted your unsourced change, cite your references in the article you edited; there is no use bringing them here.
• I turned off most notifications in my preferences, and therefore can't see pings, sorry.
• New messages go at the bottom.

Why you removed the eduts I did in SKBM Degree College Wikipedia page?

Regarding website link

Hi Sir @Materialscientist- the article Pahari people (Kashmir) under editing is away from the ground facts. A Goverment of Jammu and Kashmir department working for Pahari Speaking People of the area refers them as linguitic group on official website. Link peasted as citation but the article in question is saying that this is an ethinic group which is not correct. It looks that a major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject/ community which is making this article onesided.May please see.

IP has now created an account

Hi MS. As per my previous message, it would appear the same IP has now created an account to make the same disruptive edits (IP edit vs Teminater edit). The matching pipe-linked edit summaries are also a bit of a giveaway as well as the articles being edited. Could I ask you to take a look please? Robvanvee 10:58, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Sock farm Jagdeep singh bittu

This one looks like another sock of User:Jagdeep singh bittu. Similar modus operandi. Kindly protect the page. Note that I've also filed a page protection request at WP:RFPP and reported WP:AIV. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:20, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Daniah Mohanad

To me it looks like good-faith edits of a complete newcomer. Translating WP is not an easy task, and the guy likely did not know how to post translation to correct wiki. I think your block is far too much - the guy should instead be encouraged and guided to build Kurdish Wikipedia. Please reconsider. bw, — kashmīrī ^TALK 14:36, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Sorry

For that user I reported which you just removed, I saw the filter triggers from 10/31, and I thought it was 10/31 as in yesterday. I realize now those were from last year. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CLCStudent (talk • contribs)

Unblocked

Congratulations on getting unblocked. Maybe you could run for admin one day. (please  mention me on reply; thanks!) --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 15:19, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

I think a review is called for. -Roxy the inedible dog . wooF 15:33, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Man, your block log is even fatter than mine and has two recent vandalism blocks! I have a prideful reference to my blocks at the top of my userpage; maybe that would be something for you? Even though you don't have a gold-star block like this one of mine. Bishonen | tålk 16:17, 1 November 2020 (UTC).

Seriously, I notice the last three times you've been blocked, the blocker was yourself. Do you have some script where clicking the wrong button blocks you rather than your target? Or is it simply something you are doing to make us all chuckle? Tarl N. (discuss) 21:22, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

It is not a script, it is an advanced program called WP:HG, which often mishandles realtime reverts and substitutes the vandalising user with the reverting user. Most often this reverting user is myself, hence the blocks :-). Luckily Wikimedia allows me to rescue myself ;-). Materialscientist (talk) 10:11, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

I think Material is probably trying to rival the king of self-blocks, El C. Shoot for the stars![1] Bishonen | tålk 01:39, 2 November 2020 (UTC).

That brings me back. Ah, the misadventures of youth! El_C 04:10, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Range block?

Hello, Materialscientist! At the talk page of Sasha Banks, you blocked a disruptive IP, 41.45.127.142. Another IP in the same general range, 41.45.113.9, promptly started disrupting. Would a rangeblock be possible? If it is, I’d prefer that to protecting the talk page as requested at RFPP. Thanks. -- MelanieN (talk) 01:20, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Rangeblocking or semiprotrotecting is technically possible, but there is not enough disruption for either action. Post something here if the situation escalates. Materialscientist (talk) 09:11, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Vandalism?

Hi, Materialscientist, I was wondering if you could take a look if this is vandalism too. You reverted a former edit of this anonymous user. Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 10:20, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Admin's Barnstar
	Thanks for responding to multiple reports. Excutient (talk) 10:45, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Kidnapping of Jaycee Dugard

They've danced to another IP pool now. It's User:2600:1016:B01C:8BEE:745A:97F8:525A:36D8 this time. Note the 2600:1016:B01C... as opposed to 2600:1016:b001... that you previously blocked. Same disruptive edits. --Hammersoft (talk) 12:52, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Tom and Jerry Pirate movie

With your permission, can I add the fact that one of the pirate brothers is actually a dwarf or it's unnecessary

Olivier Baghdadi (talk) 13:24, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

FYI - unblock

HI Material,

Apologies if I already did this, but just ensuring you're aware of an unblock request at User talk:Rkprince21. It could probably use a little clarification on the original block reasoning to ensure the questions are appropriately directed. Nosebagbear (talk) 13:45, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Please see my reply here [2]. Materialscientist (talk) 15:08, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Question about edits on hip hop feminism article

hey, Materialscientist, i saw you reverted my edits on the lead section of the hip hop feminism article here: Hip-hop feminism. i shortened the lead section to better reflect what hip hop feminism is an a type of black feminism in the lead section rather than opening on what a hip hop feminist (the person who studies/or is a hip hop feminism). although you said this edit was unconstructive, i was wondering could you suggest what would be a more constructive edit to improve the article. Rone Bee (talk) 23:25, 2 November 2020 (UTC)Rone Bee

Another pool dancing IP

Greetings. On Perry High School (Stark County, Ohio), there's a dancing IP in the 2603:9000:990d:4bc3... range. Vandalism on that article from that IP range over the last 1.5 days. I'd rather not protect the article if blocking the range would help. --Hammersoft (talk) 23:32, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Socks at Bashar Masri

Hi Materialscientist, Lalaeqwv (talk · contribs) looks like another block evasion. Thanks, 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 01:44, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Argh, you beat me to vandalism yet again! Good job, though. Keep up the good work! Littlecat456💬(.log) 10:27, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Messing up the page...

Hi Materialscientist, please take a look at Karauli page. Some new editor is messing it up by over-writing things on already cited information rather than adding the data at proper place. Thanks. --HinduKshatrana (talk) 13:14, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi Materialscientist, please do take a look into this. Thanks. --HinduKshatrana (talk) 15:55, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Please explain them, on their talk page, what is wrong with their edits. Materialscientist (talk) 16:00, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Recreation of CSD G4

Hi Material,

I've re-created Anveshi Jain, both as I felt that G4 applies more strictly to genuinely deleted articles but also that, in such a borderline case, there were benefits to its existence in an AfD.

Nightfury indicated that they'd talked to you and you were okay with it being re-created without further discussion if an admin felt it should - apologies if this was a poor reading - I'm happy to discuss it further if so. Nosebagbear (talk) 13:44, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

JamalGold

Blocked User, keeps making original Reaseach. 1Mr.User200 (talk) 14:36, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Here have a goat!

I have decided to give you a goat, please enjoy your goat and take good care of him.

Pixel Art

I was not promoting anything. I was not uploading anything inappropriate. This is a good website for people who want to test it out. It would be easier if they just went to the the link I put then to search it by exiting or not exiting the website. This is easier if they just went to that link. So with your permission can I search for more links and post them on the pixel art. Please and Thank You. --PotatoPotatoPotatoTomato (talk) 18:56, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Disruptive user

Regarding this, kindly note that the the user has already been (level-4) warned by me for unsourced additions/changes in Sena dynasty article. Also note personal attacks (cuss) here. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 08:21, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Anveshi Jain

Now that AfD has concluded and the result is delete. Can you please WP:SALT Anveshi Jain again? Way too many paid users have tried to recreate it in recent times. Thanks Coderzombie (talk) 08:56, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

19dn29c2o0

Can user:19dn29c2o0 please be blocked asap. CLCStudent (talk) 14:42, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

If you want a quick action, use {{user|19dn29c2o0}}, but not [[user:19dn29c2o0 ]]. Materialscientist (talk) 14:44, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Editing

I feel like I cannot edit without who reporting my work as vandalism when it is not vandalism.:( Why is that?

Hello

Hello materialscientist, I saw your recent work in fighting vandalism great job man. I want to ask some a question you are not an administrator and you blocked a user. from,Tbiw (talk) 16:10, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Terror & Football

Hello Materialscientist,

I'm Chrigre85822.

Re: 1998 World Cup terror plot

Either you were too fast or I was too slow.

There's the source now.

Thanks, Chrigre8582 (talk) 16:46, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

List of names

Hi, sorry to disturb you. When there is a list of names (e.g. People with the given surname XXX), what is the best order? - alphabetical or chronological? I'm not sure where to find the correct style. Thanks in advance. Denisarona (talk) 16:40, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Usually alphabetical, unless the list distinctly aims to present chronology. Materialscientist (talk) 16:42, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Thanks, that's what I usually follow. Denisarona (talk) 16:44, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Thanks and suggestion regarding persistent disruptive editor

Thanks for cleaning up after and putting a block on 2603:6080:e01::/64 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). This is a persistent user who disruptively edits on two very specific topics...sister city pairings and children's TV shows. For reference, there are two previous ANI discussions about this user here and here. I see they also made another disruptive edit yesterday from 98.122.148.179 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), which had previously had a temp block on it. I'd like to suggest a longer block on 2603:6080:e01::/64 than the 60 hours you put on it, and a fresh block on 98.122.148.179. This person has engaged in this behavior over a period of almost four months now, refuses to respond to talk page messages, and is undeterred by IP blocks once they're able to move to a new IP or the blocks expire, so I'm not sure what else can be done. Thanks again. WildCowboy (talk) 17:11, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Joey Diaz

Hi, MS. Thanks again for putting a protection on Kidnapping of Jaycee Dugard. Can you place an extended block on Joey Diaz? I've had to remove uncited material from that article off and on for years now, and recently it seems to have flared up again, as I'm removing unsupported material from it seemingly every day. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 04:40, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Dorcy Howard

Hi, apologies for not including a source for the latest edit for Warner Bros. Cartoons. But I should clarify, that Dorcy Howard was a verified background artist who worked on 2 Bob Clampett cartoons, Baby Bottleneck, and Kitty Kornered.

roja

i view the series ,in sun tv and the story is progressing such. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shinchanedits (talk • contribs) 14:57, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

@Shinchanedits: Your opinions about the show do not belong in the article. You may write about what is depicted on screen, but you may not write opinions or interpretations. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:53, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

ok,added the plot as per the story,and not my opinion,sorry.

Protected edit request on 5 November 2020

Markwolfy (talk) 15:37, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

YOU STATE THAT 304 STAINLESS IS NONE MAGNETIC BUT IT IS MAGNETIC BUT LESS MAGNETIC THAN STEEL FACT. 3

 Not done this is not a valid edit request. — xaosflux ^Talk 16:27, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Would respond on my page, may cause hopefully avoidable drama because other user would read it.

Hi Materialscientist,

I would write my question there, but the users involved just commented on my talk page directly above. So they would read the conversation too and it would be hard to ask for admin help without them seeing why I was trying to get admin help for incivility. I tried leaving several incivility warnings already. So it might start more drama if it is on my talk page. Please advise. I can write on ANI boards if preferred? (You can erase this).Music23123 (talk) 17:31, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thank you for your tireless work to keep Wikipedia clear of vandalism. BJackJS talk 17:59, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Seconded. You've already reverted most of the unwanted changes on my watchlist tonight. Certes (talk) 19:24, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Pomphorhynchus laevis

Dear Materialscientist, Thank you for keeping a close watch for vandalism and the like. Could you please have another look at the edits that I made (on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pomphorhynchus_laevis). Specifically, see that in the current, reverted version, reference 2 and 6 are the same. So are 3 and 7. There are a few other of such 'mistakes' in the references. I resolved most of these and used human friendly reference names. The latter will make future edits of the page easier. Please let me know if there is anything I missed. Looking forward to hear from you. Carcharias taurus (talk) 15:22, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

reply to: Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Pomphorhynchus laevis—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 15:17, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Am I reading too much into this?

The edit summaries here seem to be saying things about someone who goes by "G. M." who might be a living person. I assume WP:BLP applies to edit summaries. On the other hand, this could be complete nonsense, which does not require special treatment. Your call. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 15:45, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Edits to Open Student Television Network

The information that was on this article was not factually correct.

First, I traced down the management team of OSTN by checking: https://web.archive.org/web/20101004195545/http://www.ostn.tv:80/OSTNWebsite/OSTNhome/ManagementTeam.html

It is incorrect that Shane Walker is the only "Key People".

After talking with Paul, Anthony and Rick I confirmed that Shane Walker was not offered a merger with OSTN. This is hearsay. I was told the reality was that Shane Walker's The University Network (TUN) ran out of money. He relocated to Ohio and joined OSTN as an employee.

Chi's Sweet Home

Both of my edits to Chi's Sweet Home fixes the original Japanese names of the episodes, adding some of the original Japanese names, the transliteration of original Japanese names, as well as missing original air dates. If you need a source for the names and dates, AnimeNewsNetworkprovides citation. It would be greatly appreciated if you could please take another look at them, at least the ones made further down the list. Thank you.

Neilia Hunter

Hello Materialscientist, I note the Neilia Hunter article has been protected due to people vandalising it in the past few minutes inserting the word "retard" etc which is of course the best decision; just prior to this I had made this edit- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Neilia_Hunter&type=revision&diff=987527843&oldid=987482657 - on the grounds that "educator" in the lead seems an unnecessary prettying-up of the fact that she was- as the linked article is titled and her own article makes clear, "a school teacher". Is there any other compelling reason for the use of "educator" over "teacher"? Online sources seem vague with regard to distinctions between the two, to say the least, with a suggestion that "educator" carries more of a sense of nobility and dedication to one's occupation than perhaps "teacher" bears. Whether this is justified in Neilia Hunter's own case I hesitate to consider, knowing nothing of her career.

Also, I had removed a statement- "Biden later garnered controversy by making incorrect allegations that the truck’s driver, Curtis Dunn, who died in 1999, was drunk at the time" recently discussed at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Joe_Biden#Inaccurate_statements_about_first_wife%E2%80%99s_accident and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Joe_Biden/Archive_13#Deaths_of_family, where- taking into consideration the analysis here- https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/biden-lie-wife-killed-drunk-driver (Snopes being, per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources, "generally reliable" as a source)- the consensus appears to have been both that the element "Biden later garnered controversy" is unnecessarily loaded language that ought not to be included, and that a lack of emphasis in mainstream sources placed on the subject of the statement leads to a conclusion of WP:UNDUE. Naturally you may disagree with all of the above and (not being American, a Biden supporter [or opponent], or in any meaningful sense involved in the subject) since I don't have a horse in the race, I'm not really invested in making a huge deal out of it, but just wanted to account for the change made lest you consider it to have constituted part of the vandalism necessitating protection of the article. Best regards 78.144.77.159 (talk) 17:20, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you

		The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		For all of your work, especially at a time when disinformation is rife. Thank you. Risker (talk) 00:32, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

The Adventures of Ronald McDonald: McTreasure Island

Hello, is The Adventures of Ronald McDonald: McTreasure Island substantially different from the version you deleted following AFD? Thanks, Captain Calm (talk) 08:12, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Not really. Deleted. Materialscientist (talk) 08:44, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Paul Bunyan

I don't know for the USA, but in Canada:

French-canadian is an ethnic group mainly located in St-Lawrence valley in Québec, eastern and northern Ontario and rlictualy in Manitoba and New-England (some famous french-canadian in the USA includes for instance: Céline Dion, Mario Lemieux, Jean-Louis "Jack" Kérouack, Léo Durocher, Robert Goulet etc.).

Franco-canadians are people people with french (from France, not from Canada) and and Canadian origin. For instance, a guy with a father form Paris and a mother from Toronto is a franco-canadian. French-canadians, Acadians ans Métis are not (or at least very rarely) designated by the term franco-canadian since the french (from France) originins are so remote

Over Seiko and brands

You can add more info using my links with the. Many greetings. Al*from*Lig (talk) 12:00, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Nagma

Regarding this, looks like someone wants this article white washed. Too much vandalism today. Will it be possible to lock it? Kindly note that one of the users involved in it [3] is an autoconfirmed user. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 19:45, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Logged-in vandal

Hi MS. I've reverted vandals before, but never one as persistent as BobEvansErie, an account clearly created to be annoying, and no idea what to do next. Doug butler (talk) 19:54, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Trieste

??? Wikiacc (¶) 02:53, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia Tranquility Waterfall Award 2020

	Wikipedia Tranquility Waterfall Award 2020
	You are being awarded the Wikipedia Tranquility Waterfall Award for 2020. Enjoy the tranquility of this waterfall as we all enjoy the tranquility provided by your tireless efforts patrolling wikipedia. Psypheriumtalk page 03:05, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Vandal report

rmv unactionable reports? it means what? angys (Talk Talk) 09:33, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

60.51.150.128 is not vandalising, their case is a content dispute at worst, such reports are not appropriate for WP:AIV. Materialscientist (talk) 09:36, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

So keep removing some scripts is considered not a vandalism? Ok btw how can I settle this case, maybe at other entry? angys (Talk Talk) 09:38, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Frankly, I don't understand why Chinese was added there before, so I understand why 60.51.150.128 is removing it and adding names in a truly national language. We do not add names in minority languages, to avoid cluttering the lead. Those who really disagree would better seek consensus at the corresponding project(s), such as WT:Geography or WT:Malaysia. Materialscientist (talk) 09:45, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

I’m doing a lot of rvv using [tool] the users need blocking some how, some comments were racist and one was sexually inappropriate. Gameshowandsportsfan2007 (talk) 12:24, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Vandalism in the page List of European countries by average wage

The user Giolocam (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) has made his Wikipedia account just to boost up Italian data while using sources that don't match these edits or simply removing other sources. I have been editing this page over the past year and I remember some different Italian IPs/users doing the same, that's why the page got semi-protected but it seems new users are able to edit this page again. I don't know if this guy is the same person, but the only edits he has made in Wikipedia are in the same page, putting up the same unsourced boosted up numbers while deleting useful changes. Just check the history of List of European countries by average wage (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) to see what's happening there. --Pfarla (talk) 14:40, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

A Spanish has a net wage lower than an Italian. Pfarla (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is trying to vandalize setting not reliable or not official sources about Italy.I set only OECD and ISTAT sources that are the only official ones. You can check it also in the article List of countries by average wage 2018. Please stop him. People laugh reading about it. I'm bored to correct his Spanish propaganda, or vandalism as you like more. Giolocam (talk) 17:25, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Somebody (a Spanish IP with a perfect timing with Pfarla (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) ) just some hours ago vandalized in pro Spanish way the article List of countries by average wage.Please have a look at it. It's really strange by timing. Giolocam (talk) 22:08, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

He edited in this last article.He was the Spanish IP. He even lasted in disrupting. Time to block him.Giolocam (talk) 01:09, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

@Giolocam: You've made your Wikipedia account just to edit the page List of European countries by average wage boosting up Italian data as you were doing priorly with other IPs before the page got semi-protected. Now I can say it's clearly you because you write in the same way and you use the same unverifiable numbers. 2A02:2F0E:117:F400:2007:2401:6477:844 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) , 2A02:2F0E:419:2100:A89B:2504:BBE:E6F4 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) , 2A02:2F0E:419:2100:E1CA:149F:250D:272A (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

I have also deleted the edits you have done in the page List of countries by average wage (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) because you are literally removing the proper order (by official data) just to boost up Italy in a higher place, as verifiable in the edit 988093606

The edits you do in the page List of European countries by average wage (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) don't match any of your data because both OECD and ISTAT sources show gross data, net wages can be only calculated with online "calculate your net wage" websites such as you were saying in the edits when you didn't have an account, and a 2.400 gross wage in Italy is not 2.000 net but barely above 1.700 , lets cite all 3 sources: OECD gross source ISTAT Net wage calculator

You are now removing official data such as ISTAT and the net wage calculator just to remove my edits (which correct your fake data) saying you're "reverting my vandalism" for putting proper data. Proof, edit 988093758 I directly came to warn an administrator not because of the edit war you have made with invented data, but because your account has been made just to edit specific edits, just as proven above. It's also worth to notice that a new account came to my profile saying I'm involved in an "edit war"because I am correcting invented data that match 0 sources from a Wiki account that has only edited the same article, boosting up Italian data.

@Materialscientist: can you please take action? This user won't stop with his disruptive edits. --Pfarla (talk) 01:20, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

@Materialscientist: Pfarla posted not official sources by private agencies .The only valid sources are OECD and ISTAT ones. He also vandalized List of countries by average wage that i restored. The rest is his creativity derivided may be from Spanish complexes towards Italy. Sorry to write, but time to BAN HIM!Giolocam (talk) 01:28, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

After what I have proven above I guess I have nothing else to say. This user's only actions are accusation, I have warned him in his talk page and instead of replying anything, he came to mock and copypaste the same in my edit page he has also broken the Wikipedia:Three-revert rule in the page List of European countries by average wage so I guess I have to make a report because this user won't stop making his disruptive edits as he's trolling right now over this issue, just as he has proven making that copypaste in my talk page. --Pfarla (talk) 01:41, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Pfarla reverted several times in few hours too. Time to be banned. May be he is technically better than me in using Wikipedia because i'm new one , but he sets not correct sources with wrong numbers.Giolocam (talk) 01:46, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Administrator odered us to solve the situation but he doesn't seem able to do that.Giolocam (talk) 02:19, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

@Giolocam: what situation do you want to solve? Coming to troll my profile with a copypaste regarding the warning I gave you like in the edit 988096613? Or maybe after I explained everything in this talk page with all of the sources, but you have replied "The rest is his creativity derivided may be from Spanish complexes towards Italy. Sorry to write, but time to BAN HIM!"

I came here to try to solve something regarding the edits you have done, yet you only revert all my changes, you aren't able to prove any of your points but just making false accusations, then you troll and do copypastes and even after I have warned about you in the ANI you copied what I wrote and changed your username for mine. I have also proven above that different IPs have done the same edits you have done in 2020 and you have only edited these 2 articles, showing clearly your account was made for specifical purposes. --Pfarla (talk) 02:28, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

I'm here to solve. I know my numbers are from official sources and sio right. Stop sending smoke in eyes. You even wrote twice to administrator that said you no. Time to solve, but it seems you want war.Giolocam (talk) 02:34, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

User:MKWiiMaster74 unblock

Hi Materialscientist, would you object to an unblock of MKWiiMaster74 (talk · contribs)? PhilKnight (talk) 15:12, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Unblocking is fine with me. Cheers. Materialscientist (talk) 15:14, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

FYI: Incorrect Warn Level

It looks like the warning you gave here got the incorrect warning level. Cheers! Perryprog (talk) 16:20, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Mistakes were made

You reverted a change that I made that included a source [In plain sight],on .exe ,for the reason that it does not have a source .Can you please explain? -A wiki user. =[