Democracy in China

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Pettymars0193 (talk | contribs) at 19:54, 15 December 2023 (Undid revision 1190073262 by 105.99.249.54 (talk)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This article is about the current state of democracy in China. For the historical and current democracy movement, see Democracy movements of China. For domestic perceptions about democratic values and governance in China, see Chinese views on democracy. For the album by Guns N' Roses, see Chinese Democracy. For the white paper published in 2021, see China: Democracy That Works.

Mao Zedong casting his vote in 1950

The debate over democracy in China has been a major ideological battleground in Chinese politics since the 19th century. China is not a liberal or representative democracy. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the Chinese government state that China is a "socialist democracy" and a "people's democratic dictatorship." Under Xi Jinping, China is also termed a "whole-process people's democracy."[1][2] Many foreign and some domestic observers categorize China as an authoritarian one-party state, with some saying it has shifted to neoauthoritarianism.[3] Some characterize it as a dictatorship.[4]

The constitution of the People's Republic of China (PRC) and the CCP constitution state that its form of government is "people's democratic dictatorship".[5] The state constitution also holds that China is a one-party state that is governed by the CCP. This gives the CCP a total monopoly of political power which it frequently exercises. All political opposition is illegal. Currently there are eight minor political parties in China other than the CCP that are legal, but all have to accept CCP primacy to exist.[6]

China is considered internationally to be amongst the least democratic countries in the world.[7][8][9][10] Freedom of speech, freedom of assembly and freedom of religion are all severely restricted by the government.[11][12] The general Chinese public has virtually no say on how the top leaders of the country are elected.[7][11] Censorship is widespread and dissent is harshly punished in the country.[8]

Qing dynasty

The first introduction of the concept of modern democracy into China is credited to exiled Chinese writer Liang Qichao. In 1895, he participated in protests in Beijing for increased popular participation during the late Qing dynasty, the last ruling dynasty of China. It was the first of its kind in modern Chinese history. After escaping to Japan following the government's clampdown on anti-Qing protesters, Liang Qichao translated and commented on the works of Hobbes, Rousseau, Locke, Hume, Bentham and many other western political philosophers. He published his essays in a series of journals that easily found an audience among Chinese intelligentsia hungering for an explanation of why China, once a formidable empire of its own, was now on the verge of being dismembered by foreign powers. In interpreting Western democracy through the prism of his strongly Confucian background, Liang shaped the ideas of democracy that would be used throughout the next century. Liang favored gradual reform to turn China into a constitutional monarchy with democracy. The goal of the Hundred Days' Reform was to reform China into such as system, but it was rapidly reversed in the Wuxu Coup.

Liang's great rival among progressive intellectuals was Dr. Sun Yat-sen, a republican revolutionary. Sun felt that democracy would be impossible as long as the Qing monarchy still existed. Democracy was part of his platform, the Three Principles of the People (三民主義) – the principle of the people under 1 nation (nationalism), the principle of the people's rights (democracy), and the principle of the people's livelihood and well-being (civility, decency and respect). Like Liang, Sun agreed that democracy, or at least universal suffrage, could not happen overnight in a country with high illiteracy rates and a lack of political consciousness. Sun's Three Stages of Revolution called for a period of "political tutelage" where people would be educated before elections can occur.

Responding to civil failures and discontent, the Qing Imperial Court responded by organizing elections. China's first modern elections were organized by Yuan Shikai for Tianjin's county council in 1907. In 1909, 21 of 22 provinces, with the exception being Xinjiang, held elections for provincial assemblies and municipal councils. Requirements were strict; only those that passed the imperial exams, worked in government or military, or owned 5000 yuan of property may vote or run for office. This essentially limited the electorate to the gentry class. Hundreds of thousands voted and the winners were overwhelmingly constitutional monarchists, followers of Liang Qichao. The provincial assemblies elected half of the 200 member national assembly, the other half was selected by regent Prince Chun. All of these assemblies became hotbeds of dissent against the Qing as they were protected by freedom of speech. In 1909, the Qing government held parliamentary elections.

Republic of China

Main articles: Politics of the Republic of China and Elections in Taiwan
New Culture Movement
Background
Aftermath of 1911 Revolution

Eastward spread of Western learning

Ideologies
Practice
Schools of thought
Major publications
Notable people

When the 1911 Revolution began, it was the provincial assemblies that provided legitimacy to the rebels by declaring their independence from the Qing Empire. The national assembly also issued an ultimatum to the Qing court. Delegates from the provincial assemblies were sent to Nanjing to publicly legitimize the authority of the provisional government of the Republic of China founded on 1 January 1912. They later also formed the provisional senate. The limited acts passed by this government included the formal abdication of the Qing dynasty and some economic initiatives.

In late 1912, national elections were held with an enlarged electorate, albeit still small proportionally to the national population. Sun's Nationalist Party dominated both houses of the National Assembly. Song Jiaoren, the incoming Nationalist prime minister, was assassinated in March 1913 before the assembly's first session. A police investigation implicated sitting prime minister Zhao Bingjun while popular belief was that provisional president Yuan Shikai was behind it. This led to the failed Second Revolution against Yuan. Victorious, Yuan forced the National Assembly to elect him president for a five-year term then purged it of Nationalists. Without a quorum, the assembly was dissolved.

After Yuan's death in 1916, the National Assembly reconvened until it was dissolved again the following year by Zhang Xun's coup attempt to restore the Qing. Prime Minister Duan Qirui refused to reconvene the National Assembly, opting instead to hold elections for a new assembly more favorable to him. As a result, a rump of the old assembly moved to Guangzhou to start a rival government in southern China. In northern China, 17 provinces elected a new assembly dominated by Duan's Anfu Club in 1918. This new assembly was dissolved following Duan's defeat in the Zhili–Anhui War of 1920.

President Xu Shichang organized elections for a third assembly in 1921, but with only 11 provinces voting it never had a quorum and thus never convened. That was the last attempt to hold national elections until 1947. All assemblies were dissolved after the Nationalists' Northern Expedition.

The formation of the Nationalist one-party state in 1927 implemented the late Sun's "political tutelage" program, which forbade elections until the people were considered properly educated. All other parties were kept out of government until 1937 when the impending Second Sino-Japanese War led to the United Front and the formation of the People's Political Council which included the smaller parties. In 1940, partly in response to tensions in the United Front, Mao Zedong offered the new CCP doctrine, New Democracy. New Democracy was an intermediary stage unlike western parliamentary, electoral democracy but not yet communism. After the war, the Nationalist's "political tutelage" ended with the promulgation of the Constitution of the Republic of China. The 1947 National Assembly and 1948 legislative elections were boycotted by the Communists which held most of northern China. As a result, the Nationalists and their junior coalition partners, the Chinese Youth Party and China Democratic Socialist Party, won.

Taiwan, 1945–present

See also: Elections in Taiwan

In 1945, after the Surrender of Japan, governance of Taiwan was transferred to the Republic of China. The ceding of Taiwan was formalized under the Treaty of Taipei in 1952.[13][14] After the governmental exodus from mainland China to the island of Taiwan in 1949, martial law was imposed following the February 28 Incident in 1947.[15][16] The period of martial law lasted for 38 years and 57 days from 19 May 1949 to 15 July 1987.[17] During this period, The Republic of China was governed as a de facto one-party state under the Kuomintang although it maintained its status as a de jure parliamentary republic.[18]

On 28 September 1986, the Democratic Progressive Party was founded as an alternate party to the Kuomintang.[18][19] Since the lifting of martial law in 1987, the ROC has had two major political parties, the Kuomintang and the Democratic Progressive Party. Since then, smaller parties have split from the two main parties and formed as new groups, largely within the Pan-Blue Coalition and Pan-Green Coalition.[20] Until 1996, the President of the Republic of China was elected by the National Assembly. In 1996, the Republic of China electoral code was amended to allow for direct election of the President via plurality voting.[21][22]

The Pan-Blue Coalition consists of the Kuomintang, the People First Party (PFP), New Party (CNP), and Minkuotang (MKT). The Pan-Blue parties traditionally favor Chinese unification under a democratic China, with some moving towards a position supporting the present status quo with eventual unification with China.[23][24][22]

The Pan-Green Coalition consists of the Democratic Progressive Party, Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU), Taiwan Independence Party (TAIP), and Taiwan Constitution Association (TCA). The Pan-Green traditionally favor Taiwanese independence.[23][22]

People's Republic of China

See also: Politics of the People's Republic of China, Elections in the People's Republic of China, and Chinese democracy movement

China continuously elucidates "socialist democracy with Chinese characteristics", officially portraying itself as a democratic country, but explicitly distinguishing itself from the liberal democratic system, which is seen "unfit" to China's "unique conditions".[25] In PRC definition, democracy has meant the Marxist–Leninist concepts of people's democratic dictatorship and democratic centralism. In this viewpoint, CCP acts as the representative of the Chinese public.[26]

The core socialist values campaign introduced during the 18th National Congress in 2012[27] promotes democracy as one of its four national values.[28]: 204  CCP general secretary Xi Jinping has additionally coined the term "whole-process people's democracy" (全过程人民民主), also called "whole-process democracy" (全过程民主, 全过程的民主) which he said "put the people as masters" and that in it "all major legislative decisions are made only after democratic deliberations and thorough procedures to ensure sound and democratic decision-making". He said that "whole-process democracy" had four pillars:[29]

  1. process democracy (过程民主) and achievement democracy (成果民主)
  2. procedural democracy (程序民主) and substantive democracy (实质民主)
  3. direct democracy (直接民主) and indirect democracy (间接民主)
  4. people's democracy (人民民主) and will of the state (国家意志)

At the key to claims that China is democratic is the claim the CCP itself is inherently democratic. In this viewpoint, decisions by the central CCP leadership are discussed at all levels in "democratic life meetings" under the principle of democratic centralism. Additionally, CCP claims that it considers other shareholders and interests through "consultative democracy" (协商民主), as long as they do not challenge the CCP priorities, with the main channel for this being the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC).[30][26][31] The CPPCC is an institutional component of the CCP's "people's democracy" and united front strategy, which provides a "seat" for the eight small legally-permitted parties and independent nonparty "friends."[30] These eight parties were founded before the proclamation of the PRC, and they must accept the "leading role" of the CCP as a condition of their continued existence.[32]

Another claim is that the CCP practices intra-party democracy, which has been repeatedly emphasized and expounded by the CCP as an alternative to liberal democratic ideals characterized by multiparty elections and competition.[33]

China conducts direct and indirect elections for its people's congresses, a practice that began in the communist areas during the Chinese Civil War.[34] The operation of people's congresses were set out in the Electoral Law of 1953 and have been subsequently revised.[34] Currently there are five levels of people's congresses.[34] From more to less local, they are: (1) people's congresses in villages, minority nationality townships, and towns; (2) people's congresses of cities that are not sub-divided, municipal districts, counties, and autonomous counties; (3) people's congresses in sub-districts of larger cities and in autonomous prefectures; (4) people's congresses in provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly administered by China's central government; and (5) the National People's Congress.[34] Direct elections occur at the two most local levels, while the members at the higher levels are indirectly elected, i.e., elected by those elected in the lower levels.[34] The National People's Congress is officially China's highest organ of state power.[35] However, nominations at all levels are controlled by the CCP, and CCP's leading position is enshrined in the state constitution, meaning that the elections have little way of influencing politics.[26][36] Additionally, elections are not pluralistic as no opposition is allowed.[26]

CCP's rule over China is widely considered to be authoritarian by political scientists,[37][36] and is considered internationally to be amongst the least democratic countries in the world.[7][8][9][10] It has consistently been ranked amongst the lowest as an "authoritarian regime" by the Economist Intelligence Unit's Democracy Index, ranking at 156th out of 167 countries in 2022.[38] Freedom of speech, freedom of assembly and freedom of religion are all severely restricted by the government.[11][12] The general Chinese public has virtually no say on how the top leaders of the country are elected.[7][11] Censorship is widespread and dissent is harshly punished in the country.[8]

History

The People's Republic of China (PRC) was initially based on Mao's concept of "New Democracy", not the immediate "dictatorship of the proletariat". New Democracy incorporates a coalition of classes subsumed under the leadership of the Communist Party and the working class.[39] This coalition of classes is symbolized by the four smaller stars on the flag of China: workers, peasants, intellectuals, and the national bourgeoisie.[30] Soon, however, Mao called for establishing the "people's democratic dictatorship", and it has since been reflected in the Chinese constitution.[5]

The Cultural Revolution promoted political empowerment of ordinary Chinese people, according to academic Dongping Han.[40] Prior to the Cultural Revolution, rural production team leaders were appointed by village leaders (who had themselves been appointed by commune leaders).[40] In his fieldwork in Jimo, academic Dongping Han found that production team leaders during the Cultural Revolution were elected by team members to one year terms as part of what Han describes as a rising democratic consciousness among ordinary people.[40]

In the Democracy Wall movement of 1978 to 1979, movement participants argued that "democracy" was the means to resolve conflict between the bureaucratic class and the people, although the nature of the proposed democratic institutions was a major source of disagreement among participants.[41] A majority viewed the movement as part of a struggle between correct and incorrect notions of Marxism.[42] Many participants advocated classical Marxist views that drew on the Paris Commune for inspiration.[43] The Democracy Wall movement also included non-Marxists and anti-Marxists, although these participants were a minority.[44]

Starting in the 1980s, in the period of Opening and Reform, the government organized village elections in which several candidates would run.

Leaders of the post-Mao reforms in the 1980s argued that the Party's record under Mao was bad, but that the Party reformed without being forced. The American political scientist Andrew Nathan concluded that "the reforms aimed to change China from a terror-based, totalitarian dictatorship to a 'mature,' administered dictatorship of the Post-Stalinist Soviet or Eastern European type." "Democracy" would not involve elections or participation in decision making but "the rule of law", which was based on procedural regularity in the exercise of power.[45]

In the spring of 1989, student leaders of the Chinese Democracy Movement expressed demands for democracy in terms which deliberately recalled the demands of the May Fourth Movement, which led to the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests. Intellectual leaders such as Liu Xiaobo and Fang Lizhi supported their calls for participation in government and procedures to fight corruption.

21st century

In December 2008, more than 350 intellectual and cultural leaders, including Liu Xiaobo, issued Charter 08. The Charter said China remains the only large world power to still retain an authoritarian system that so infringes on human rights, and "This situation must change! Political democratic reforms cannot be delayed any longer!"[46]

Chinese premier Wen Jiabao called for more democracy in 2011, having generally been regarded as a political reformer during his career.[47] However, Wu Bangguo, chairman of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress, said in 2011 that "we have made a solemn declaration that we will not employ a system of multiple parties holding office in rotation", having said similar remarks during his career. This was reported by BBC News of showing a split in China's leadership, although the general leadership is said to weigh closer to Wu's comment.[48]

After Xi Jinping became CCP general secretary in 2012, Amnesty International said that human rights in China have become worse.[49] In 2013, a CCP memo called "Document Number 9" was leaked, which warned against "Western constitutional democracy" along with other Western ideas.[50] Human rights abuses are rejected by the government, which insists the country is run according to law.[49] During a visit to Europe in 2014, CCP general secretary Xi Jinping said that a multi-party system would not work for China. He said China had experimented in the past with various political systems, including multi-party democracy, warning that copying foreign political or development models could be catastrophic because of its unique historical and social conditions.[51] Xi has strengthened the CCP's control over the government[52] and in 2018 amended the party and state constitutions to include Xi Jinping Thought, described as the next stage of socialism with Chinese characteristics. In that same year, the Chinese government has also abolished term limits for the presidency, allowing Xi to rule for life.[53][54][55]

In 2021, in response to the Summit for Democracy held by US president Joe Biden, the State Council of China released a white paper called China: Democracy That Works which praised China's "whole-process democracy", said that "there are many ways to achieve democracy" and disparaged American democracy as "performative."[56] The white paper describes China's position that "There is no single road to democracy. The true barrier to democracy lies not in different models of democracy, but in arrogance, prejudice and hostility towards other countries’ attempts to explore their own paths to democracy, and in assumed superiority and the determination to impose one's own model of democracy on others."[57]

Special Administrative Regions, 1997–present

Main articles: Politics of Hong Kong, Elections in Hong Kong, Politics of Macau, and Elections in Macau

As European colonies, Hong Kong and Macau were denied democratic governments until very late in the colonial period. Official memos from CCP leaders, threatening the British government if they were to hold elections in Hong Kong, were repeatedly sent from the 1950s onwards.[58][59] Hong Kong got its first elections in the 1980s, and Macau in the 1990s.

Both Hong Kong and Macau have legislatures; 35 of Hong Kong's 70 legislators are directly elected, as are 14 of Macau's 33. Also, like grassroots elections in China, Hong Kong does hold elections for the district councils, which act as consultants to the government. Following electoral reforms implemented by the Mainland government, the legislature of Hong Kong following the 2021 general election will only have 20 out of 90 members directly elected.

Hong Kong

Main article: Democratic development in Hong Kong

The first Chief Executive election saw the Chief Executive elected by a 400-member Selection Committee in 1996, then by 800-member Election Committee in 2002, 2005, 2007, and then 1200-member Election Committee in 2012 and 2017.

The Legislative Council of Hong Kong from 1997 to 2004 had 60 seats with 24 were directly elected, six elected from an 800-member electoral college known as the Election Committee of Hong Kong, and 30 elected from FCs. Elections in 2004 and 2008, had 30 members were directly elected by universal suffrage from geographical constituencies (GCs) and 30 were elected from functional constituencies (FCs). From 2012 onwards, The Legislative Council consists of 70 elected members, 35 members were directly elected by universal suffrage from geographical constituencies and 35 were elected from functional constituencies.

There have been many attempts with many different ideas to introduce universal suffrage since the handover. Electoral reform in Hong Kong was seen as an avenue for political liberalization in China;[60] the universal suffrage reform package which would allow Hongkongers to vote for the chief executive but the chief executive first needed to be approved by a committee. The law failed to pass Hong Kong's legislative council when pan-democrats voted against the package and most of the pro-Beijing members walked out.[61][62]

In 2014, Hong Kong experienced massive protests against the Chinese government's universal suffrage reform package, as the candidates would have to "love the country, and love Hong Kong" and would "protect the broad stability of Hong Kong now and in the future" to be able to stand for election.[63] The universal suffrage reform package failed to pass Hong Kong's legislative council when the majority voted against the package.[61]

On December 20, 2021, China's central government issued a white paper on its view of democracy in Hong Kong, which it framed as an executive-led governance arrangement designed to ensure Hong Kong's capacity and efficacy.[64]: 186  According to this view, there is no single set of criteria for democracy and no single democratic model that is universally acceptable.[64]: 186  The white paper states that Hong Kong's democracy should not be a replica of some other democratic model and that in the central government's view, principles of national sovereignty and security require that central authorities have the final say in determining Hong Kong's method of democracy.[64]: 186–187 

Macau

The first Macao Legislative Council in 1996 had 23 members: eight of whom were directly elected (GC), eight indirectly (FC), and seven nominated by the Chief Executive. Its second Legislative Council (2001) had four more members: two more directly elected and two more indirectly. Its third and fourth (2005 and 2009) legislative councils had 29 members, and the fifth (2013) and sixth (2017) have 33.[citation needed]

The first Chief Executive of Macau was elected by the 200-member Chief Executive Selection Committee in 1999, 2004 and 2009 saw the Chief Executive elected by 300-member Election Committee, and 400-member Election Committee in 2014 and 2019.[citation needed]

Surveys

Very few comprehensive surveys have been done to understand the popular support for or against democracy.[65] A 1990 survey from Andrew Nathan and Tianjian Shi reported that 55% of people surveyed agree that "China needs more democracy now", but 76% agreed that Chinese democracy depends on the leadership of the Chinese Communist Party.[66] They also reported that a sizeable proportion feared the negative aspects of democracy, 36% agreed that too many parties would "cause political chaos."

Surveys done with the World Values Survey and the East Asia Barometer in 2001 and 2002 shows high explicit support for democracy.[67] In the survey, 96% answered either "fairly good" or "very good" to the question "Do you think having a democratic political system is....". Moreover, 81% of respondents agreed with the statement "democracy may have problems but it is better than any form government." When asked to compare authoritarianism or democracy, only 5% of respondents said that an authoritarian government can be preferable, with 20% saying it does not matter. When chosen to rate out of 10 how suitable democracy is for China, only 2% gave a rating lower than 5, 96% gave a 6 or higher, 76% giving an 8, 9 or 10. Nevertheless, 60 to 70% of respondents feared some democratic practices may cause negative effects. 26% agreed or strongly agreed with the statements "in democracy the economic systems runs badly." 35% agreed with that statement "democracies are indecisive and have too much quibbling." 18% agreed with the statement "democracies aren't good at maintaining order."

An Asian Barometer survey from 2014 to 2016 had 76% of Chinese respondents agreeing that democracy was capable of solving the problems in their society. However, when asked to rate the level of democracy in their own government on a 10-point scale, they gave an overall rating of 6.5 (the 7th highest percentage out of 14 different regions surveyed).[68]

Zhengxu Wang of Fudan University in Shanghai wrote in a report in 2007: "It is clear that public support for democracy is high in China. Public opinion surveys show that more than 90% of Chinese citizens believe that having a democracy is good. But the majority is not yet ready for a major effort towards democratization because they still see economic growth and social stability as more important than freedom of speech, political participation, and other democratic rights."[65]

A report of two Stanford professors, Jennifer Pan and Yiqing Xu, done between 2018 and 2019 showed that a majority of Chinese people believed that the government had no right to interfere in how many children people had, and that the government should allow public expression of negative views of government policies. The poll also showed that Chinese people with higher income or Chinese students studying in the US being more politically and economically liberal.[69]

A 2020 Harvard University study conducted yearly since 2003 found that Chinese citizens' trust in their government has increased each year, "virtually across the board."[70]

In 2022, a poll by the Alliance of Democracies Foundation found that 91% of Chinese say democracy is important to them, with an 81% saying that China is a democracy.[71]

See also

References

  1. ^ Mattingly, Daniel C. (5 December 2019). The Art of Political Control in China. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-316-99791-8.
  2. ^ "Whole-Process Democracy". China Media Project. 23 November 2021. Retrieved 10 January 2023.
  3. ^ Perlez, Jane (13 November 2017). "Behind the Scenes, Communist Strategist Presses China's Rise". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 17 December 2022.
  4. ^ Heurlin, Christopher (27 October 2016). Responsive Authoritarianism in China: Land, Protests, and Policy Making. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-108-10780-8.
  5. ^ a b "The National People's Congress of the People's Republic of China". npc.gov.cn. Retrieved 15 December 2021.
  6. ^ Wong, Alan (10 September 2018). "Is China a democracy? A long (and better) answer". Inkstone News. Archived from the original on 9 December 2018. Retrieved 7 December 2018.
  7. ^ a b c d George, Nectar Gan,Steve (8 December 2021). "China claims its authoritarian one-party system is a democracy -- and one that works better than the US". CNN. Retrieved 16 December 2022.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  8. ^ a b c d Bradsher, Keith; Myers, Steven Lee (7 December 2021). "Ahead of Biden's Democracy Summit, China Says: We're Also a Democracy". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 16 December 2022.
  9. ^ a b Hale, Erin. "China claims to have 'democracy that works' ahead of Biden summit". www.aljazeera.com. Retrieved 16 December 2022.
  10. ^ a b "China attacks 'US-style democracy' prior to Biden summit". The Guardian. 6 December 2021. Retrieved 16 December 2022.
  11. ^ a b c d "China: Freedom on the Net 2022 Country Report". Freedom House. Retrieved 16 December 2022.
  12. ^ a b Human Rights Watch (13 January 2021), "China: Events of 2020", English, retrieved 16 December 2022
  13. ^ "Far East (Formosa and the Pescadores)". Hansard. 540 (cc1870–4). 4 May 1955. Archived from the original on 18 October 2017. Retrieved 1 September 2010. The sovereignty was Japanese until 1952. The Japanese Treaty came into force, and at that time Formosa was being administered by the Chinese Nationalists, to whom it was entrusted in 1945, as a military occupation.
  14. ^ Charney, Jonathan I.; Prescott, J. R. V. (2000). "Resolving Cross-Strait Relations Between China and Taiwan". American Journal of International Law. 94 (3): 453–477. doi:10.2307/2555319. JSTOR 2555319. S2CID 144402230. After occupying Taiwan in 1945 as a result of Japan's surrender, the Nationalists were defeated on the mainland in 1949, abandoning it to retreat to Taiwan.
  15. ^ 三、 台灣戒嚴令 [III. Decree to establish martial law in Taiwan] (in Chinese). National Archives Administration, National Development Council. 2 October 2009. Archived from the original on 10 October 2012. Retrieved 23 May 2012.
  16. ^ Rubinstein, Murray A. (2007). Taiwan: A New History. Armonk, N.Y.: M. E. Sharpe. p. 302. ISBN 9780765614957.
  17. ^ Huang, Tai-lin (20 May 2005). "White Terror exhibit unveils part of the truth". Taipei Times. p. 2. Archived from the original on 20 December 2019. Retrieved 25 May 2020.
  18. ^ a b Lu, Lu Hsin-hui; Kuo, Chung-han (28 September 2016). "DPP should clarify its cross-strait policy: founding member". Central News Agency. Archived from the original on 29 September 2016. Retrieved 29 September 2016.
  19. ^ Chung, Li-hua; Chin, Jonathan (30 September 2016). "DPP members say party must discuss core values". Taipei Times. Archived from the original on 30 September 2016. Retrieved 30 September 2016.
  20. ^ Kuo, Lily (9 January 2020). "'We need more dreams': Taiwan's 'Squad' rallies youth ahead of election". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 13 April 2020. Retrieved 3 May 2020.
  21. ^ Copper, John Franklin (1998). "The 1996 Elections". Taiwan's Mid-1990s Elections: Taking the Final Steps to Democracy. Greenwood Publishing Group. ISBN 9780275962074.
  22. ^ a b c "Taiwan's 2020 presidential elections: who are the contenders?". Hong Kong Free Press. 4 January 2020. Retrieved 3 May 2020.
  23. ^ a b Zhu, Yunhan (2005). "Taiwan's Year of Stress". Journal of Democracy. 16 (2): 43–57. doi:10.1353/jod.2005.0023. ISSN 1086-3214. S2CID 143483622.
  24. ^ "New Party vows to sign peace treaty". Taipei Times. 21 August 2017. Archived from the original on 14 November 2019. Retrieved 3 May 2020.
  25. ^ Kim, Jo. "Exploring China's New Narrative on Democracy". The Diplomat. Archived from the original on 6 December 2019. Retrieved 10 April 2020.
  26. ^ a b c d "Democracy". Decoding China. 4 February 2021. Retrieved 22 August 2022.
  27. ^ "How Much Should We Read Into China's New "Core Socialist Values"?". Council on Foreign Relations. Retrieved 13 December 2023.
  28. ^ Santos, Gonçalo (2021). Chinese Village Life Today: Building Families in an Age of Transition. Seattle: University of Washington Press. ISBN 978-0-295-74738-5.
  29. ^ Chen, Stella (23 November 2021). "Whole-Process Democracy". China Media Project. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  30. ^ a b c Lin, Chun (2006). The transformation of Chinese socialism. Durham [N.C.]: Duke University Press. p. 150. ISBN 978-0-8223-3785-0. OCLC 63178961.
  31. ^ Joske, Alex (2020). "The party speaks for you: Foreign interference and the Chinese Communist Party's united front system". Australian Strategic Policy Institute. JSTOR resrep25132. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  32. ^ Tselichtchev, Ivan, ed. (2 January 2012). China Versus the West: The Global Power Shift of the 21st Century. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. doi:10.1002/9781119199311. ISBN 978-1-119-19931-1. OCLC 883259659.
  33. ^ Guo, Dingping (June 2009). "The Growth of Intra-party Democracy and Its Implications for China's Democratic Future". Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences. 7: 1–19. doi:10.1007/s40647-013-0001-z. S2CID 154985939.
  34. ^ a b c d e Boer, Roland (2021). Socialism with Chinese characteristics : a guide for foreigners. Singapore. p. 193. ISBN 978-981-16-1622-8. OCLC 1249470522.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  35. ^ "Constitution". en.npc.gov.cn.cdurl.cn. Retrieved 23 August 2022.
  36. ^ a b Truex, Rory (28 October 2016). Making Autocracy Work. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-107-17243-2.
  37. ^ Tang, Wenfang (4 January 2016). Populist Authoritarianism: Chinese Political Culture and Regime Sustainability. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-049081-2.
  38. ^ "The world's most, and least, democratic countries in 2022". The Economist. 1 February 2023. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 2 February 2023.
  39. ^ Lin, Chun (2006). The transformation of Chinese socialism. Durham [N.C.]: Duke University Press. p. 42. ISBN 978-0-8223-3785-0. OCLC 63178961.
  40. ^ a b c Han, Dongping (2008). The Unknown Cultural Revolution: Life and Change in a Chinese Village. New York: Monthly Review Press. p. 71. ISBN 978-1-58367-180-1. OCLC 227930948.
  41. ^ Paltemaa, Lauri (2007). "The Democracy Wall Movement, Marxist Revisionism, and the Variations on Socialist Democracy". Journal of Contemporary China. 16 (53): 611. doi:10.1080/10670560701562325. ISSN 1067-0564. S2CID 143933209.
  42. ^ Paltemaa, Lauri (2007). "The Democracy Wall Movement, Marxist Revisionism, and the Variations on Socialist Democracy". Journal of Contemporary China. 16 (53): 623. doi:10.1080/10670560701562325. ISSN 1067-0564. S2CID 143933209.
  43. ^ Paltemaa, Lauri (2007). "The Democracy Wall Movement, Marxist Revisionism, and the Variations on Socialist Democracy". Journal of Contemporary China. 16 (53): 611. doi:10.1080/10670560701562325. ISSN 1067-0564. S2CID 143933209.
  44. ^ Paltemaa, Lauri (2007). "The Democracy Wall Movement, Marxist Revisionism, and the Variations on Socialist Democracy". Journal of Contemporary China. 16 (53): 620. doi:10.1080/10670560701562325. ISSN 1067-0564. S2CID 143933209.
  45. ^ Andrew J. Nathan. Chinese Democracy. (New York: Knopf : Distributed by Random House, 1985). ISBN 039451386X. pp. 227–228.
  46. ^ Macartney, Jane (10 December 2008). "Leading Chinese dissident, Liu Xiaobo, arrested over freedom charter". London: Times Online. Archived from the original on 4 June 2011. Retrieved 10 December 2008.
  47. ^ "Chinese premier Wen Jiabao calls for more democracy". BBC News. 15 September 2011. Retrieved 26 August 2022.
  48. ^ "Chinese leader rules out democracy". BBC News. 10 March 2011. Retrieved 23 August 2022.
  49. ^ a b "Human rights in China under Xi Jinping 'worst since Tiananmen crackdown': Amnesty". South China Morning Post. Amnesty International. 17 November 2017. Archived from the original on 21 December 2019. Retrieved 26 December 2019.
  50. ^ Buckley, Chris (19 August 2013). "China Takes Aim at Western Ideas". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 24 August 2013. Retrieved 10 April 2020.
  51. ^ "Xi says multi-party system didn't work for China". Reuters. 2 April 2014. Archived from the original on 7 August 2019. Retrieved 25 December 2019.
  52. ^ Mitchell, Tom (6 September 2021). "The Chinese control revolution: the Maoist echoes of Xi's power play". Financial Times. Retrieved 14 April 2022.
  53. ^ "Xi Jinping as 'Authoritarian Reformer'". Freedom House. Retrieved 13 April 2022.
  54. ^ Andrésy, Agnès (2016). Xi Jinping : red China, the next generation. Lanham, Maryland. ISBN 978-0-7618-6601-5. OCLC 927168921.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  55. ^ Doubek, James (11 March 2018). "China Removes Presidential Term Limits, Enabling Xi Jinping To Rule Indefinitely". NPR. Retrieved 13 April 2022.
  56. ^ "中国发布民主白皮书， "民主峰会"前夕与美争夺话语权". BBC News (in Simplified Chinese). Retrieved 26 August 2022.
  57. ^ "Full text: China: Democracy That Works_Embassy of the People's Republic of China in the United States of America". us.china-embassy.gov.cn. Retrieved 16 December 2022.
  58. ^ Guilford, Gwynn (10 October 2014). "The secret history of Hong Kong's stillborn democracy". Quartz. Archived from the original on 10 June 2019. Retrieved 10 June 2019.
  59. ^ Jacobs, Andrew (27 October 2014). "Hong Kong Democracy Standoff, Circa 1960". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 29 December 2016. Retrieved 4 December 2018.
  60. ^ Buckley, Chris; Forsythe, Michael (31 August 2014). "China Restricts Voting Reforms for Hong Kong". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 27 February 2015. Retrieved 10 April 2020.
  61. ^ a b "Hong Kong reform package rejected as pro-Beijing camp walk out in 'miscommunication'". South China Morning Post. 18 June 2015. Archived from the original on 28 April 2020. Retrieved 12 April 2020.
  62. ^ "HK lawmakers shun Beijing poll plan". BBC News. 18 June 2015. Retrieved 30 September 2020.
  63. ^ Buckley, Chris; Forsythe, Michael (31 August 2014). "China Restricts Voting Reforms for Hong Kong". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 27 February 2015. Retrieved 12 April 2020.
  64. ^ a b c Hu, Richard (2023). Reinventing the Chinese City. New York: Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0-231-21101-7.
  65. ^ a b Wang, Zhengxu (November 2007). "Public Support for Democracy in China". Journal of Contemporary China. 16 (53): 561–579. doi:10.1080/10670560701562283. S2CID 153972558.
  66. ^ Nathan, Andrew; Shi, Tianjian (1993). "Cultural requisites for democracy in China: some findings from a survey". Daedalus. 122 (2): 95–123.
  67. ^ "Social Change and Social Attitudes Survey". WVS China 2001, EAB China 2002. 2002.
  68. ^ Chu Yun-han. "How Asians View Democracy: Three Puzzles (pages 10 and 13)" (PDF). Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy. Asian Barometer Survey. Archived (PDF) from the original on 14 October 2021.
  69. ^ Mazzocco, Ilaria; Kennedy, Scott (9 February 2022). "Public Opinion in China: A Liberal Silent Majority?". Center for Strategic and International Studies. Retrieved 26 August 2022.
  70. ^ Cunningham, Edward; Saich, Tony; Turiel, Jessie (2020). "Understanding CCP Resilience: Surveying Chinese Public Opinion Through Time". ash.harvard.edu. Retrieved 16 December 2022.
  71. ^ O'Connor, Tom (30 May 2022). "Most in China call their nation a democracy, most in U.S. say America isn't". Newsweek. Retrieved 26 August 2022.

Further reading

Library resources about
Democracy in China
  • Nathan, Andrew (1985). Chinese Democracy. New York, USA: Knopf. ISBN 978-0-394-51386-7.
  • Daniel Bell, East Meets West: Human Rights and Democracy in East Asia (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2000).
  • Daniel Bell, Beyond Liberal Democracy: Political Thinking for an East Asian Context (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2006).
  • Edmund S. K. Fung, In Search of Chinese Democracy: Civil Opposition in Nationalist China, 1929–1949 (Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000. Cambridge Modern China Series). xviii, 407p. ISBN 0-521-77124-2
  • Hu, Shaohua. Explaining Chinese Democratization (Westport, CT: Praeger, 2000).
  • Liu Jianfei (刘建飞), Democracy and China (Beijing: New World Press, 2011). 178 p. ISBN 9787510412240
  • Holbig, Heike, und Günter Schucher (2016), "He who says C must say D"—China's Attempt to Become the "World's Largest Democracy", GIGA Focus Asia, 02, June, 2016
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Democracy_in_China&oldid=1190073303"