Franco-Mongol alliance: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Campaign of winter 1299-1300: +refs, not single source
→‎Campaign of winter 1299-1300: Reinstated deleted reference
Line 173: Line 173:
</ref> The Mongols and their Christian allies defeated the Mamluks in the [[Battle of Wadi al-Khazandar]] on December 23 or 24, 1299,<ref>Demurger, p.142</ref> and the remaining Mamluk forces retreated back to Egypt. The Mongol il-Khan was the "de facto" lord of the Holy Land for about four months, from January to May 1300.<ref>"For a brief period, some four months in all, the Mongol Il-Khan was de facto the lord of the Holy Land", Schein, p810</ref> Damascus was the next to surrender, somewhere between December 30, 1299, and January 6, 1300, though its Citadel resisted.<ref>Demurger 142-143</ref><ref>Runciman, p.439</ref> Contemporary Arab writter mention the exactions in Damas of the Armenian and Georgian Christians together with the Mongols.<ref>"Ibn Kathir attributes partially the responsibility of these massacres and destructions to the Georgian and Armenian Chritians that were accompanying the Mongols", "Textes Spirituels D'Ibn Taymiyya", Chap XI</ref> [[James II of Aragon]], sent a congratulation letter to Ghazan for his victories.<ref>"Adh-Dhababi's Record of the Destruction of Damascus by the Mongols in 1299-1301", Note 18, p.359</ref>
</ref> The Mongols and their Christian allies defeated the Mamluks in the [[Battle of Wadi al-Khazandar]] on December 23 or 24, 1299,<ref>Demurger, p.142</ref> and the remaining Mamluk forces retreated back to Egypt. The Mongol il-Khan was the "de facto" lord of the Holy Land for about four months, from January to May 1300.<ref>"For a brief period, some four months in all, the Mongol Il-Khan was de facto the lord of the Holy Land", Schein, p810</ref> Damascus was the next to surrender, somewhere between December 30, 1299, and January 6, 1300, though its Citadel resisted.<ref>Demurger 142-143</ref><ref>Runciman, p.439</ref> Contemporary Arab writter mention the exactions in Damas of the Armenian and Georgian Christians together with the Mongols.<ref>"Ibn Kathir attributes partially the responsibility of these massacres and destructions to the Georgian and Armenian Chritians that were accompanying the Mongols", "Textes Spirituels D'Ibn Taymiyya", Chap XI</ref> [[James II of Aragon]], sent a congratulation letter to Ghazan for his victories.<ref>"Adh-Dhababi's Record of the Destruction of Damascus by the Mongols in 1299-1301", Note 18, p.359</ref>


According to both Arab and Christian historians, the Mongols also engaged in raids as far south as Gaza,<ref name=schein-raid>"Meanwhile the Mongol and Armenian troops raided the country as far south as Gaza." Schein, 1979, p. 810</ref><ref>"He pursued the Sarazins as far as Gaza, and then turn to Damas, conquering and destroying the Sarazins". Original French: "Il chevaucha apres les Sarazins jusques a Guadres et puis se mist vers Domas concuillant et destruyant les Sarazins." Le Templier de Tyr, #609</ref>, most ancient sources, both Western and Arab, mentionning the capture of Jerusalem.<ref>"In 1300 (...) the Mongols made 100,000 captives among the Muslims. In Jerusalem, in Jabal al-Salihiya, in Naplouse, in Homs, in Daraya and elsewere, they killed and made a number of captives that only God can reckon" Ibn Tamiyya, circa 1300, Chap 11, p.67 [http://www.muslimphilosophy.com/it/works/ITA%20Texspi.pdf Ibn Tamiyya, Chap 11, p.67]</ref><ref>"The Tatars then made a raid against Jerusalem and against the city of Khalil. They massacred the inhabitants of these two cities (...) it is impossible to describe the amount of atrocities, destructions, plundering they did, the number of prisonners, children and women, they took as slaves". Ibn Abi L-Fada'Il, Histoire, Transl. Blochet t.XIV, p.667, quotes in Ibn Taymiyya, Textes Spirituels, Chap XI</ref><ref>"Ghazan dispatched messengers to the kings of Jerusalem and Cyprus, and to the communes and to the religious orders, asking them to come to him in Damas or Jerusalem, so that he could remit to them all the lands the Christians held at the time of [[Godefroy de Bouillon]]". Letter of Thomas Gras, Cyprus, March 24, 1300</ref> Armenian sources said that King [[Hethoum II]] "with a small force" spent 15 days in Jerusalem visiting the [[Holy Places]]. Ghazan however withdrew his troops in February 1300 because another conflict erupted in Central Asia with the [[Chagatai Khanate]]. He announced that he would return in the winter of 1300-1301 to attack Egypt.<ref>Demurger, p.146</ref> He left part of his troops in Syria under the emir Mulai, but the Mamluks returned by May 1300 and defeated the weakened Mongol force.<ref name=schein-810>Schein, 1979, p. 810</ref>
According to both Arab and Christian historians, the Mongols also engaged in raids as far south as Gaza,<ref name=schein-raid>"Meanwhile the Mongol and Armenian troops raided the country as far south as Gaza." Schein, 1979, p. 810</ref><ref>"He pursued the Sarazins as far as Gaza, and then turn to Damas, conquering and destroying the Sarazins". Original French: "Il chevaucha apres les Sarazins jusques a Guadres et puis se mist vers Domas concuillant et destruyant les Sarazins." Le Templier de Tyr, #609</ref>, and most ancient sources, both Western and Arab, mention the capture of Jerusalem.<ref>"In 1300 (...) the Mongols made 100,000 captives among the Muslims. In Jerusalem, in Jabal al-Salihiya, in Naplouse, in Homs, in Daraya and elsewere, they killed and made a number of captives that only God can reckon" Ibn Tamiyya, circa 1300, Chap 11, p.67 [http://www.muslimphilosophy.com/it/works/ITA%20Texspi.pdf Ibn Tamiyya, Chap 11, p.67]</ref><ref>"The Tatars then made a raid against Jerusalem and against the city of Khalil. They massacred the inhabitants of these two cities (...) it is impossible to describe the amount of atrocities, destructions, plundering they did, the number of prisonners, children and women, they took as slaves". Ibn Abi L-Fada'Il, Histoire, Transl. Blochet t.XIV, p.667, quotes in Ibn Taymiyya, Textes Spirituels, Chap XI</ref><ref>"Ghazan dispatched messengers to the kings of Jerusalem and Cyprus, and to the communes and to the religious orders, asking them to come to him in Damas or Jerusalem, so that he could remit to them all the lands the Christians held at the time of [[Godefroy de Bouillon]]". Letter of Thomas Gras, Cyprus, March 24, 1300</ref> Armenian sources said that King [[Hethoum II]] "with a small force" spent 15 days in Jerusalem visiting the [[Holy Places]]. Other reports mention that Christians were there in April to celebrate [[Easter]].<ref>Chroniques de France, edited by Jules Viard: "Et a Pasques ensivant, si comme l'en dit, en Jherusalem le service de Dieu les crestiens avec exaltacion de grant joie celebrerent". Quoted in Demurger, p.280</ref> Ghazan however withdrew his troops in February 1300 because another conflict erupted in Central Asia with the [[Chagatai Khanate]]. He announced that he would return in the winter of 1300-1301 to attack Egypt.<ref>Demurger, p.146</ref> He left part of his troops in Syria under the emir Mulai, called "Molay" by Le Templier de Tyr,<ref>"611. Ghazan, we he had vanquished the Sarazins returned in his country, and left in Damas one of his Admirals, who was named Molay, who had with him 10,000 Tatars and 4 general."611. Cacan quant il eut desconfit les Sarazins se retorna en son pais et laissa a Domas .i. sien amiraill en son leuc quy ot a nom Molay qui ot o luy .xm. Tatars et .iiii. amiraus."</ref>, but the Mamluks returned by May 1300 and defeated the weakened Mongol force.<ref name=schein-810>Schein, 1979, p. 810</ref>


Meanwhile in early 1300, two Frank rulers, [[Guy d'Ibelin]] and [[Jean II de Giblet]], moved in with their troops from Cyprus in response to Ghazan's earlier call, and established a base in the castle of Nefin in [[Gibelet]] on the Syrian coast with the intention of joining him, but Ghazan was already gone.<ref>Demurger, p.144</ref><ref>"After Ghazan had left, some Christians from Cyprus arrived in [[Gibelet]] and Nefin, led by Guy, [[Count of Jaffa]], and Jean d'Antioche with their knights, and from there proceeded to go to Armenia where the camp of the Tatars was. But Ghazan was gone, so they had to return."|Le Templier de Tyr, 614. - Le Templier de Tyr, 614: "Et apres que Cazan fu partis aucuns crestiens de Chipre estoient ales a Giblet et a Nefin et en seles terres de seles marines les quels vous nomeray: Guy conte de Jaffe et messire Johan dantioche et lor chevaliers; et de la cuyderent aler en Ermenie quy estoit a lost des Tatars. Cazan sen estoit retornes: il se mist a revenir"</ref>
Meanwhile in early 1300, two Frank rulers, [[Guy d'Ibelin]] and [[Jean II de Giblet]], moved in with their troops from Cyprus in response to Ghazan's earlier call, and established a base in the castle of Nefin in [[Gibelet]] on the Syrian coast with the intention of joining him, but Ghazan was already gone.<ref>Demurger, p.144</ref><ref>"After Ghazan had left, some Christians from Cyprus arrived in [[Gibelet]] and Nefin, led by Guy, [[Count of Jaffa]], and Jean d'Antioche with their knights, and from there proceeded to go to Armenia where the camp of the Tatars was. But Ghazan was gone, so they had to return."|Le Templier de Tyr, 614. - Le Templier de Tyr, 614: "Et apres que Cazan fu partis aucuns crestiens de Chipre estoient ales a Giblet et a Nefin et en seles terres de seles marines les quels vous nomeray: Guy conte de Jaffe et messire Johan dantioche et lor chevaliers; et de la cuyderent aler en Ermenie quy estoit a lost des Tatars. Cazan sen estoit retornes: il se mist a revenir"</ref>

Revision as of 07:49, 13 September 2007

File:ChristianStatesInTheLevant.jpg
Among the Christian states in the Levant (in yellow) Little Armenia and the northern Frank kingdom of Antioch were the most regular allies of the Mongols.

The Franco-Mongol alliance covers a period from the mid-1200s to the early 1300s, starting around the time of the Seventh Crusade. During this time, some of the Frankish kingdoms of the Levant (also known as Crusader States)[1] and the countries of Western Europe attempted to form an alliance with the Mongol Ilkhanate based in Persia, in order to combat their common Muslim enemy in the Middle East. There were numerous exchanges of letters and emissaries between the Mongols and the European monarchs, most of which did not result in anything substantial, though there were a few coordinated military efforts.

The first attempt at a military collaboration took place during the Crusade of the French king Louis IX, between 1248 to 1254. In 1260, most of Muslim Syria was conquered by the joint efforts of the Franks, the Armenians and the Mongols,[2] only to be retaken by the Egyptian Mamluks when the Mongols had to remove most of their forces due to conflicts within their own ranks in Central Asia. The Mongols again invaded Syria several times between 1281 and 1312, sometimes in alliance or attempted alliance with the Christians, though there were considerable logistical difficulties involved. Ultimately, the attempts at alliance bore little fruit, and ended with the victory of the Egyptian Mamluks, the total eviction of both the Franks and the Mongols from Palestine by 1303, and a treaty of peace between the Mongols and the Mamluks in 1322.

Religious affinity

File:Stone 1-1-.jpg
The Nestorian Stele in China, erected in 781.

Overall, Mongols were highly tolerant of most religions, and typically sponsored several at the same time. When Genghis Khan declared the Baljuna Covenant with 17 of his companions, several of them were Christian.[3] Many Mongol tribes, such as the Kerait,[4] the Naiman, the Merkit, and to a large extent the Kara Khitan, were Nestorian Christian.[5] All the sons of Genghis Khan had taken Christian wives, from the tribe of the Kerait. While the men were away at battle, the empire was effectively run by the Christian women.[6][7] The Mongolian Khan Sartaq was Christian;[8] as was the general Kitbuqa,[9] commander of the Mongol forces of the Levant, who fought in alliance with Christians. Under Mongka, the main religious influence was that of the Nestorians.[10]

Other Mongols, such as Berke, the ruler of the Golden Horde, were highly favourable to Islam, leading to conflicts between Mongol clans, as in the Berke-Hulagu war. However, in the 1200s, the greatest affinity appears to have been with the Christians. Hulagu was himself the son of a Christian woman, and when he invaded Syria, though he slaughtered other defenders, he allowed the Christians to live. Marital alliances with Western powers also occurred, as in the 1265 marriage of Maria Despina Palaiologina, the Christian daughter of Emperor Michael VIII Palaeologus, with the Mongol khan Abaqa.

Early contacts (1209-1244)

Gengis Khan (1162-1227)

There had long been rumors and expectations that a great Christian ally would come from "the East." These rumors circulated as early as the First Crusade, and usually surged in popularity after the loss of a battle by the Crusaders, which resulted in a natural human desire that a Christian hero would arrive from a distant land, to help save the day. This resulted in the development of a legend about a figure known as Prester John. The legend fed upon itself, and some individuals who came from the East were greeted with the expectations that they might be the long-awaited Christian heroes.

During the Fifth Crusade, as the Christians were unsuccessfully laying siege to the Egyptian city of Damietta in 1221, these legends conflated with the reality of the Mongols. Rumors circulated that a "Christian king of the Indies", a King David who was either Prester John or one of his descendants, had been attacking Muslims in the East, and was on his way to help the Christians in their Crusades.[11] And in a letter dated June 20th, 1221, Pope Honorius III commented about "forces coming from the Far East to rescue the Holy Land".[12]

Gengis Khan himself was a Shamanist, but was tolerant of other faiths, and was especially fond of Christianity. His sons were married to Christian princesses, of the Kerait clan, who held considerable influence at his court. The Nestorian Christians of Central Asia were generally highly favorable to him[13] and hoped for an alliance between the Mongols and Western Christianity.

The Mongols first invaded Persian territory in 1220, destroying the Kwarizmian kingdom of Jelel-ad-Din, and then conquering the kingdom of Georgia ruled by George IV, who submitted to him, soon followed by Hetoum I, king of the Armenians, who became a longtime advocate of the Mongols.[14]

Genghis Khan then returned to Mongolia, and Persia was reconquered by Muslim forces,[15] until a huge Mongol army again came in 1231 under the general Chormaqan. He ruled over Persia and Azerbaijan from 1231 to 1241.[16] In 1242, Baichu further invaded the Seldjuk kingdom, ruled by Kaikhosrau, in modern Turkey, again eliminating an enemy of Christendom.[17]

Papal overtures (1245-1248)

Pope Innocent IV sent envoys for an alliance with the Mongols.

The Mongol invasion of Europe subsided in 1242 with the death of the Great Khan Ögedei, successor of Genghis Khan. However, the relentless march westward of the Mongols had displaced the Khawarizmi Turks, who themselves moved west, and on their way to ally with the Ayyubid muslims in Egypt, took Jerusalem from the Christians in 1244.[18] This event prompted Christian kings to prepare for a new Crusade, decided by Pope Innocent IV at the Council of Lyons in June 1245, and revived hopes that the Mongols, who had Christian princesses among them and had brought so much destruction to Islam, could become allies of Christendom.[19][20]

In 1245, Pope Innocent IV issued bulls and sent an envoy in the person of the Franciscan John of Plano Carpini to the "Emperor of the Tartars". The message asked the Mongol ruler to become a Christian and stop his aggression against Europe. Carpini was in Karakorum for the installation of the new Khan on April 8, 1246,[21] Khan Güyük, whose reply was simply to demand the submission of the Pope[22] and a visit from the rulers of the West in homage to Mongol power:

"You must say with a sincere heart: "We will be your subjects; we will give you our strength". You must in person come with your kings, all together, without exception, to render us service and pay us homage. Only then will we acknowledge your submission. And if you do not follow the order of God, and go against our orders, we will know you as our enemy."

— Letter from Güyük to Pope Innocent IV, 1246.[23]

In 1245 Innocent had sent another mission, through another route, led by the Dominican Ascelin of Lombardia, also bearing letters. The mission met with the Mongol commander Baichu near the Caspian Sea in 1247. Baichu, who had plans to capture Baghdad, welcomed the possibility of an alliance and had envoys, Aïbeg and Serkis, accompany the embassy back by to Rome, where they stayed for about a year.[24] They met with Innocent IV in 1248, who again appealed to the Mongols to stop their killing of Christians, and complained that the alliance was not moving forward.[25][26]

Saint Louis and the Mongols (1248-1254)

Louis IX of France, also called Saint Louis, had several epistolary exchanges with the Mongol rulers of the period, and organized the dispatch of ambassadors to them. Contacts started in 1248, with Mongolian envoys bearing a letter from Eljigidei, the Mongol ruler of Armenia and Persia, offering military alliance:[27] when Louis disembarked in Cyprus in preparation of his first Crusade, he was met in Nicosia with two Nestorians from Mossul named David and Marc, envoys of Eljigidei. They communicated a proposal to form an alliance with the Mongols against the Ayyubids and against the Caliphate in Baghdad:[28]

Statue of Louis IX at the Sainte Chapelle, Paris.
File:Crusade damietta.jpg
Louis IX attacks Damietta in Egypt.

"Whilst the King was tarrying in Cyprus, the great King of the Tartars sent messengers to him, greeting him courteously, and bearing word, amongst other things, that he was ready to help him conquer the Holy Land and deliver Jerusalem out of the hand of the Saracens. The King received them most graciously, and sent in reply messengers of his own, who remained away two years, before they returned to him. Moreover the King sent to the King of the Tartars by the messengers a tent made in the style of a chapel, which cost a great deal, for it was made wholly of good fine scarlet cloth. And to entice them if possible into our faith, the King caused pictures to be inlaid in the said chapel, portraying the annunciation of Our Lady, and all the other points of the Creed. These things he sent them by two Preaching Friars, who knew Arabic, in order to show and teach them what they ought to believe."

— "The Memoirs of the Lord of Joinville", Chap. V, Jean de Joinville.[29]

In response, Louis sent André de Longjumeau, a Dominican priest, as an emissary to the Great Khan Güyük in Mongolia. However, Güyük died before their arrival at his court, and his widow Oghul Ghaimish simply gave the emissary a gift and a condescending letter to take back to King Louis.[30]

Meanwhile, Eljigidei, the Great Khan's lieutenant in Asia Minor, planned an attack on the Muslims in Baghdad in 1248. This advance was, ideally, to be conducted in alliance with Louis, in concert with the Seventh Crusade. According to the 13th century monk and historian Guillaume de Nangis, Eljigidei suggested that King Louis should land in Egypt, while Eljigidei attacked Baghdad, in order to prevent the Saracens of Egypt and those of Syria from joining forces.[31] Louis IX did go on to attack Egypt, starting with the capture of the port of Damietta. However, Güyük's early death, caused by drink, made Eljigidei postpone operations until after the interregnum, and Louis lost his army at Mansurah.

In 1253, Louis tried again, and sought allies from among both the Ismailian Assassins and the Mongols.[32] When he received word that that the Mongol leader Sartaq, son of Batu, had converted to Christianity,[33] Louis dispatched an envoy to the Mongol court in the person of the Franciscan William of Rubruck, who went to visit the Great Khan Möngke in Mongolia. But Möngke replied only with a letter to William in 1254, asking for the King's submission to Mongol authority.[34]

Louis finally had to return to France, due to the death of his mother and regent, Blanche de Castille. The Mongols would be successful in the Siege of Baghdad in 1258. Bohemond VI was present alongside the Mongols during the siege.[35] When they conquered the city, the Mongols slaughtered the Muslim defenders, while sparing the Christians.[36]

Joint conquest of Muslim Syria (1259-1260)

Hulagu conquered Muslim Syria, together with Armenian and Frankish allies.

A certain amount of military collaboration did not really take place until 1259-1260, when the Franks, under Bohemond VI of Antioch and his father-in-law Hetoum I allied with the Mongols under Hulagu. Hulagu was generally favourable to Christianity, and was himself the son of a Christian woman. The combined Christian and Mongol forces conquered Muslim Syria, taking together the city of Aleppo. Later, they also took Damascus[37] together with the Christian Mongol general Kitbuqa.[38]

Some of the conquered cities (including Lattakieh) were given to Bohemond VI, but the Mongols insisted that the Greek Christian patriarch Euthymius be installed in Antioch,[39] which resulted in a temporary excommunication for Bohemond.[40]

Following a new conflict in Turkestan, Hulagu had to stop the Mongol invasion before it reached Egypt, and he only left about 10,000 Mongol horsemen in Syria under Kitbuqa to occupy the conquered territory.[41]

In 1260, the Franks of Acre maintained a position of cautious neutrality. They sent the Dominican David of Ashby to the court of Hulagu in 1260,[42] but also entered into a passive alliance with the Egyptian Mamluks, which allowed the Mamluk forces to move through Christian territory unhampered.[43] This allowed the Mamluks to counter-attack the Mongols, at the pivotal Battle of Ain Jalut on September 3, 1260. It was the first major battle that the Mongols lost, and effectively set the western border for what had seemed an unstoppable Mongol expansion.

The Christian Armenian king Hetoum I was an ally of the Mongols, together with his son-in-law, the Frank ruler of Antioch, Bohemond VI.

On April 10, 1262, Hulagu sent through John the Hungarian a new letter to the French king Louis IX from the city of Maragheh, offering again an alliance. The letter mentioned Hulagu's intention to capture Jerusalem for the benefit of the Pope, and asked for Louis to send a fleet against Egypt. Though Hulegu promised the restoration of Jerusalem to the Christians, he also insisted on Mongol sovereignty, in their quest for conquering the world. King Louis transmitted the letter to Pope Urban IV, who answered by asking for Hulagu's conversion to Christianity.[44] The Pope also issued the papal bull Exultavit cor nostrum, which tentatively agreed to Hulegu's plans, but only cautiously.[11]

The Mamluk leader Baibars then began to threaten Antioch, which (as a vassal of the Armenians) had earlier supported the Mongols.[45] In 1262, the king of Armenia went to the Mongols and again obtained their intervention to deliver the city.[46]

Bohemond VI was again present at the court of Hulagu in 1264, trying to obtain as much support as possible from Mongol rulers against the Mamluk progression. His presence is described by the Armemian saint Vartan:[47]

"In 1264, l'Il-Khan had me called, as well as the vartabeds Sarkis (Serge) and Krikor (Gregory), and Avak, priest of Tiflis. We arrived at the place of this powerful monarch at the beginning of the Tartar year, in July, period of the solemn assembly of the kuriltai. Here were all the Princes, Kings and Sultans submitted by the Tartars, with wonderful presents. Among them, I saw Hetoum I, king of Armenia, David, king of Georgia, the Prince of Antioch (Bohemond VI), and a quantity of Sultans from Persia.

— Vartan, trad. Dulaurier.[48]

In 1265, the new Khan Abaqa further pursued Western cooperation. He corresponded with Pope Clement IV through 1267-1268, and reportedly sent a Mongol ambassador in 1268. Abaqa proposed a joint alliance between his forces, those of the West, and the father of Abaqa's wife, the Byzantine emperor Michael VIII Palaeologos. Abaqa received responses from Rome and from Jaume I of Aragon, though it is unclear if this was what led to Jaume's unsuccessful expedition to Acre in 1269.[11]

The Mamluk leader Baibars finally took the Armenian city of Antioch in 1268, and all of northern Syria was quickly lost, leaving Bohemond with no estates except Tripoli.[49] In 1271, Baibars sent a letter to Bohemond threatening him with total annihilation and taunted him for his former alliance with the Mongols:

"Our yellow flags have repelled your red flags, and the sound of the bells has been replaced by the call: "Allâh Akbar!" (...) Warn your walls and your churches that soon our siege machinery will deal with them, your knights that soon our swords will invite themselves in their homes (...) We will see then what use will be your alliance with Abagha"

— Letter from Baibars to Bohemond VI, 1271[50]

Alliances during the Eighth and Ninth Crusades

Other attempts at Mongol alliance were made in preparation to the Second Crusade of Louix IX (the Eighth Crusade). And when Prince Edward of England arrived in Acre in 1271, ambassadors were sent to Abaqa to try to arrange a joint venture against Egypt. Abaqa did send a force of 10,000 Mongol horsemen, but nothing significant was accomplished,[11] apart from a 10-year truce with the Mamluks.[51] Also in 1271, one of the vassals of Bohemond, named Barthélémy de Maraclée, lord of Khrab Marqiya, a small coastal town between Baniyas and Tortosa, is recorded as having fled from the Mamluk offensive, taking refuge in Persia at the Mongol Court of Abagha, where he exhorted the Mongols to intervene in the Holy Land.[52][53]

Abagha (1234-1282), the son of Hulagu and Oroqina Khatun, a Mongol Christian, was the second Ilkhanate emperor in Persia, who reigned from 1265-1282. During his reign, Abagha, a devout Buddhist, attempted to convert the Muslims and harassed them mercilessly by promoting Nestorian and Buddhist interests ahead of the Muslims. He sent embassies to Pope Gregory X and Edward I of England. During his harsh reign, many Muslims had attempted to assassinate Abaqa. In 1265, upon his succession, he received the hand of Maria Despina Palaiologina, the illegitimate daughter of Emperor Michael VIII Palaeologus, in marriage.[54]

Diplomatic alliance from Pope Clement IV (1267)

The Mamluks were extending their conquests in Syria during the 1260s, putting the Syrian Franks in a difficult situation.

The French Pope Clement IV proposed an alliance between the Mongols and the Crusaders in 1267.

In 1267, Pope Clement IV and James I of Aragon sent an ambassador to the Mongol ruler Abaqa Khan in the person of Jayme Alaric de Perpignan.[55] Jayme Alaric would return to Europe in 1269 with a Mongol embassy. In a letter dated 1267, and written from Viterbo, the Pope welcomes Abagha's proposal for an alliance and informs him of a Crusade in the near future:

"The kings of France and Navarre, taking to heart the situation in the Holy Land, and decorated with the Holy Cross, are readying themselves to attacks the enemies of the Cross. You wrote to us that you wished to join your father-in-law (the Greek emperor Michael VIII Palaiologos) to assist the Latins. We abundantly praise you for this, but we cannot tell you yet, before having asked to the rulers, what road they are planning to follow. We will transmit to them your advice, so as to enlighten their deliberations, and will inform your Magnificence, through a secure message, of what will have been decided."

— 1267 letter from Pope Clement IV to Abagha[56]

On March 24, 1267, Louis IX had indeed expressed the intention to mount a new Crusade. When he left on July 1, 1270, however, the Eighth Crusade went to Tunis in modern Tunisia instead of Syria, for reasons which even today are not well understood. Louis IX would die of illness there, his last words being "Jerusalem".[57]

The Pope's promise was also followed by a small crusade initiated by James I of Aragon, but ultimately handled by his two bastards Fernando Sanchez and Pedro Fernandez after a storm forced most of the fleet to return, which arrived in Acre in December 1269. At that time, Abagha had to face an invasion in Khorasan by fellow Mongols from Turkestan, and could only commit a small force on the Syrian frontier from October 1269, only capable of brandishing the threat of an invasion.[58]

When Abagha finally defeated his eastern enemies near Herat in 1270, he wrote to Louis IX offering military support as soon as the Crusaders landed in Palestine.[59]

Prince Edward and his alliance with the Mongols (1269-1274)

Edward I allied with the Mongol as a young Crusader Prince.

In 1269, the English Prince Edward (the future Edward I) started on a Crusade of his own. The number of knights and retainers that accompanied Edward on the crusade was quite small, possibly around 230 knights, other sources stating 1,000.[60] Many of the members of Edward's expedition were close friends and family including his wife Eleanor of Castile, his brother Edmund, and his first cousin Henry of Almain.

As soon as he arrived in Acre, on May 9th, 1271, he sent an embassy to the Mongol ruler of Persia Abagha, an enemy of the Muslims. Edward's plan was to join forces with the Mongols.[61] The embassy was led by Reginald Russel, Godefrey Welles and John Parker, and its mission was to obtain military support from the Mongols.[62].[63] In an answer dated September 4th, 1271, Abagha agreed for cooperation and asked at what date the concerted attack on the Mamluks should take place:

"The messengers that Sir Edward and the Christians had sent to the Tartars came back to Acre, and they did so well that they brought the Tartars with them"

— Estoire d'Eracles, p461.[62]

The arrival of the additional forces of Hugh III of Cyprus further emboldened Edward, who engaged in a raid into the Plain of Sharon, although he proved unable to take the small Mamluk fortress of Qaqun.[64] In mid-October 1271, the Mongol troops requested by Edward arrived in Syria and ravaged the land from Aleppo southward. Abagha, occupied by other conflicts in Turkestan could only send 10,000 Mongol horsemen under general Samagar from the occupation army in Seljuk Anatolia, plus auxiliary Seljukid troops,.[63] but they triggered an exodus of Muslim populations (who remembered the previous campaigns of Kithuqa) as far south as Cairo.[62] The Mongols defeated the Turcoman troops that protected Aleppo, putting to flight the Mamluk garrison in that city, and continued their advance to Maarat an-Numan and Apamea.[63]

When Baibars mounted a counter-offensive from Egypt on November 12th, the Mongols had already retreated beyond the Euphrates, unable to face the full Mamluk army.

These unsettling events however allowed Edward to negotiate a ten year peace treaty with the Mamluks. Upon hearing of the death of Henry III, Edward left the Holy Land and returned to England in 1274.

Overall, Edward's crusade gave the city of Acre a reprieve of ten years through a truce with the Mamluks.[64] However, Edward's reputation was greatly enhanced by his participation in the crusade and he was hailed by some contemporary commentators as a new Richard the Lionheart. Furthermore, some historians believe Edward was inspired by the design of the castles he saw while on crusade and incorporated similar features into the castles he built to secure portions of Wales, such as Caernarfon Castle.

New joint attempt at invading Syria (1280-1281)

Following the death of Baibars and the ensuing disorganisation of the Muslim realm, the Mongols seized the opportunity and organized a new invasion of Syrian land:

"Abaga ordered the Tartars to occupy Syria, the land and the cities, and remit them to be guarded by the Christians."

— Monk Hayton of Corycus, "Fleur des Histoires d'Orient", circa 1300[65]
File:Margatview.jpg
The Hospitaller Knights of the fortress of Marqab fought together with the Mongols.

The new sultan Qalawun however managed to neutralize the threat of combined Frank-Mongol operations by signing with the Franks of Acre a 10 year truce (which he would later breach). The Mongols sent envoys to Acre to request military support, informing the Franks that they were fielding 50,000 Mongol horsemen and 50,000 Mongol infantry, but in vain. However the Mongol raids were made in combination with about 200 Hospitaliers knights of the fortress of Marqab,[66][67] who considered they were not bound by the truce with the Mamluks:[68]

"In the year 1281 of the incarnation of Christ, the Tatars left their realm, crossed Aygues Froides with a very great army and invaded the land of Aleppo, Haman and La Chemele and did great damage to the Sarazins and killed many, and with them were the king of Armenia and some Frank knights of Syria."

— Le Chevalier de Tyre, Chap. 407[69]

In September 1281, 50,000 Mongol troops, together with 30,000 Armenians, Georgians, Greeks, and the Hospitalier Knights fought against Qalawun at the Second Battle of Homs, but they were repelled, with heavy loss on both sides. The prior of the English Hospitallers, Joseph of Chauncy was present at the battle and sent an account to Edward I. He notably explained that Bohemond VI had been delayed and could not join the battle.[68]

Arghun's proposals for a new crusade (1285-1291)

The new ruler Arghun, son of Abaqa, again sent an embassy and a letter to Pope Honorius IV in 1285, a Latin translation of which is preserved in the Vatican.[70] It mentions the links to Christianity of Arghun's family, and proposes a combined military conquest of Muslim lands:[71]

"As the land of the Muslims, that is, Syria and Egypt, is placed between us and you, we will encircle and strangle ("estrengebimus") it. We will send our messengers to ask you to send an army to Egypt, so that us on one side, and you on the other, we can, with good warriors, take it over. Let us know through secure messengers when you would like this to happen. We will chase the Saracens, with the help of the Lord, the Pope, and the Great Khan."

— Extract from the 1285 letter from Arghun to Honorius IV, Vatican[72]

In the Levant, Arghon was also considered as a supporter of the Christian faith:

"This Arghon loved the Christians very much, and several times asked to the Pope and the king of France how they could together destroy all the Sarazins"

— Le Templier de Tyr [73]
Extract of the letter of Arghun to Philip the Fair, in the Uyghur script, dated 1289. It was remitted to the French king by Buscarel of Gisolfe. French National Archives.

Apparently left without an answer, Arghun sent another embassy to European rulers in 1287, headed by the Nestorian Rabban Bar Sauma, with the objective of contracting a military alliance to fight the Muslims in the Middle East, and take the city of Jerusalem.[74] Sauma returned in 1288 with positive letters from Pope Nicholas IV, Edward I of England, and Philip IV the Fair of France.[75]. Philip seemingly responded positively to the request of the embassy:

"And the King Philip said: if it be indeed so that the Mongols, though they are not Christians, are going to fight against the Arabs for the capture of Jerusalem, it is meet especially for us that we should fight [with them], and if our Lord willeth, go forth in full strength."

— "The Monks of Kublai Khan Emperor of China[76]

Philip also gave the embassy numerous presents, and sent one of his noblemen, Gobert de Helleville, to accompany Bar Sauma back to Mongol lands:

"And he said unto us, "I will send with you one of the great Amirs whom I have here with me to give an answer to King Arghon"; and the king gave Rabban Sawma gifts and apparel of great price."

— "The Monks of Kublai Khan Emperor of China[77]
Rabban Bar Sauma travelled from Pekin in the East, to Rome, Paris and Bordeaux in the West, meeting with the major rulers of the period, even before Marco Polo's return from Asia.

Gobert de Helleville departed on February 2nd, 1288, with two clerics Robert de Senlis and Guillaume de Bruyères, as well as arbaletier Audin de Bourges. They joined Bar Sauma in Rome, and accompanied him to Persia.[78]

King Edward also welcomed the embassy enthusiastically:

"King Edward rejoiced greatly, and he was especially glad when Rabban Sauma talked about the matter of Jerusalem. And he said "We the kings of these cities bear upon our bodies the sign of the Cross, and we have no subject of thought except this matter. And my mind is relieved on the subject about which I have been thinking, when I hear that King Arghun thinketh as I think""

— Account of the travels of Rabban Bar Sauma, Chap. VII.[79]

In 1289, Arghun sent a third mission to Europe, in the person of Buscarel of Gisolfe, a Genoese who had settled in Persia.[80] The objective of the mission was to determine at what date concerted Christian and Mongol efforts could start. Arghun committed to march his troops as soon as the Crusaders had disembarked at Saint-Jean-d'Acre. Buscarel was in Rome between July 15th and September 30th, 1289. He was in Paris in November-December 1289. He remitted a letter from Arghun to Philippe le Bel, answering to Philippe's own letter and promises, and fixing the date of the offensive from the winter of 1290 to spring of 1291:[81]

File:Philippe IV Le Bel.jpg
Philip the Fair agreed in writing to joint military operations with the Mongol ruler Arghun, against the Mamluks.

"Under the power of the eternal sky, the message of the great king, Arghun, to the king of France..., said: I have accepted the word that you forwarded by the messengers under Saymer Sagura (Bar Sauma), saying that if the warriors of Il Khaan invade Egypt you would support them. We would also lend our support by going there at the end of the Tiger year’s winter [1290], worshiping the sky, and settle in Damascus in the early spring [1291].

If you send your warriors as promised and conquer Egypt, worshiping the sky, then I shall give you Jerusalem. If any of our warriors arrive later than arranged, all will be futile and no one will benefit. If you care to please give me your impressions, and I would also be very willing to accept any samples of French opulence that you care to burden your messengers with.

I send this to you by Myckeril and say: All will be known by the power of the sky and the greatness of kings. This letter was scribed on the sixth of the early summer in the year of the Ox at Ho’ndlon."

— Letter from Arghun to Philippe le Bel, 1289, France royal archives[82][83]

Buscarel then went to England to bring Arghun's message to King Edward I. He arrived in London January 5th, 1290. Edward, whose answer has been preserved, answered enthusiastically to the project but remained evasive and failed to make a clear commitment.[84]

Arghun then sent a fourth mission to European courts in 1290, led by a certain Andrew Zagan, who was accompanied by Buscarel of Gisolfe and a Christian named Sahadin.[85]

All these attempts to mount a combined offensive failed. On March 1291, Saint-Jean-d'Acre was conquered by the Mamluks in the Siege of Acre. Arghun himself died on March 10th, 1291, putting an end to his efforts towards combined action.[86]

Had the alliance succeeded, the existence of the Christian kingdoms in the Middle-East would probably have been prolonged, the Mamluks would have been destroyed, and the Mongol Il-Khanate would probably have prospered as an ally of the Christians in the Holy Land.[87]

Last joint operations in the Levant (1298-1303)

From around 1298, there were increased efforts at military collaboration between the Franks and the Mongols, with either little success or disastrous consequences.[88][89] The plan was to coordinate actions between the Christian military orders, the King of Cyprus, the aristocracy of Cyprus and Little Armenia and the Mongols of the khanate of Ilkhan (Persia).[90]

In 1298 or 1299, Jacques de Molay, as well as Otton de Grandson and the Great Master of the Hospitallers, briefly campaigned in Armenia, in order to fight off an invasion by the Mamluks.[91][92][93] Soon however, the fortress of Roche-Guillaume in the Belen pass, the last Templar stronghold in Antioch, was lost to the Mamluks.[94]

In 1300, the Mongols took Syrian cities, but then had to withdraw before the Crusaders could arrive. After the Mongols had withdrawn, the Crusaders launched some sea-based attacks on the coast, and then attempted a land-based attack at Tortosa, but when the Mongol reinforcements were delayed, the Crusaders had to withdraw to Ruad Island. When the Mongols did arrive, they were fought back by the Mamluks on land, and in 1302, the Mamluks besieged the Crusader garrison as well, finally forcing its surrender, and the death or capture of all its inhabitants. With the loss of Ruad, the Crusaders had lost their last foothold in the Holy Land.[95]

Campaign of winter 1299-1300

In the summer of 1299, Hethoum sent a message to the Mongol khan of Persia, Ghâzân to obtain his support. Ghazan, already on the march with his forces towards Syria, sent letters to the Franks of Cyprus (the King of Cyprus, and the heads of the Knights Templar, the Hospitallers and the Teutonic Knights), inviting them to come join him in his attack on the Mamluks in Syria. Ghazan's first letter was sent on October 21, which arrived 15 days later, and sent a second letter in November.[96] Ghazan moved ahead, and the Mongols successfully took the city of Aleppo.[97] There, Ghazan was joined by King Hethoum II of Armenia and some of his own forces, some Armenian Hospitallers and Templars.[98] The Mongols and their Christian allies defeated the Mamluks in the Battle of Wadi al-Khazandar on December 23 or 24, 1299,[99] and the remaining Mamluk forces retreated back to Egypt. The Mongol il-Khan was the "de facto" lord of the Holy Land for about four months, from January to May 1300.[100] Damascus was the next to surrender, somewhere between December 30, 1299, and January 6, 1300, though its Citadel resisted.[101][102] Contemporary Arab writter mention the exactions in Damas of the Armenian and Georgian Christians together with the Mongols.[103] James II of Aragon, sent a congratulation letter to Ghazan for his victories.[104]

According to both Arab and Christian historians, the Mongols also engaged in raids as far south as Gaza,[105][106], and most ancient sources, both Western and Arab, mention the capture of Jerusalem.[107][108][109] Armenian sources said that King Hethoum II "with a small force" spent 15 days in Jerusalem visiting the Holy Places. Other reports mention that Christians were there in April to celebrate Easter.[110] Ghazan however withdrew his troops in February 1300 because another conflict erupted in Central Asia with the Chagatai Khanate. He announced that he would return in the winter of 1300-1301 to attack Egypt.[111] He left part of his troops in Syria under the emir Mulai, called "Molay" by Le Templier de Tyr,[112], but the Mamluks returned by May 1300 and defeated the weakened Mongol force.[113]

Meanwhile in early 1300, two Frank rulers, Guy d'Ibelin and Jean II de Giblet, moved in with their troops from Cyprus in response to Ghazan's earlier call, and established a base in the castle of Nefin in Gibelet on the Syrian coast with the intention of joining him, but Ghazan was already gone.[114][115]

By May 1300, the Mamluk forces had returned to the area. In July, the Crusader forces from Cyprus attempted to assist, engaging in coastal raids that stretched from Alexandria in Egypt, up to Tortosa. The ships then returned to Cyprus, and prepared for an attack on Tortosa in late 1300.

The fate of Jerusalem in 1300

There has long been disagreement as to the exact fate of the city of Jerusalem after the 1299 Mamluk retreat from the Mongol forces. As recently as the 1800s, the French historian Raynouard claimed that the Mongols had taken the city in a great battle with cooperation from Jacques de Molay and the Knights Templar.[116] However, though some modern historians state that there is some peripheral evidence to indicate that the Mongols may have been briefly in control of the city, no one has any documentation of any kind of a major battle. Indeed, some historians, such as in The Medieval Expansion of Europe, state categorically that "Jerusalem had not been taken or even besieged." Riley-Smith, in The Crusades, chalked up the stories to rumors.[117]

Dr. Sylvia Schein (d. 2004), in her 1979 article "Gesta Dei per Mongolos", states "The alleged recovery of the Holy Land never happened,"[118] though other historians have interpreted her research in different ways. David Morgan in The Mongols, using Schein as a reference, agrees that of the taking of Jerusalem, "this had not in fact happened."[119] However, Andrew Jotischky used Schein's 1979 and 1991 research to state, "after a brief and largely symbolic occupation of Jerusalem, Ghazan withdrew to Persia."[120] Though, this is a possible misinterpretation, since Schein never stated as a fact that Ghazan was in Jerusalem, but instead listed that claim as one of the potential rumors that was flying around Europe in 1300.

Schein's main argument was that the mix of fact and fiction in 1300 combined into a major story that the Europeans wanted to believe, and so it was passed from person to person, steadily growing in the re-telling. The rumors that swept through Europe said that the Mongols had taken Jerusalem, and were going to give it back to the Christians. In her writing, Schein compiled a detailed list of any fragments of sources which implied that Jerusalem had in fact been either conquered by the Mongols, or at least briefly occupied. For example, in her 1979 article Gesta Dei per Mongolos, she pointed out that some Arab historians in the 1920s documented that after the capture of Syria in 1299/1300, some Mongol forces had engaged in raids as far south as Gaza.[121] In 1991, in her book Fidelis Crucis, Schein also reported one source that said that the Mongols must have conquered Jerusalem because they had removed a gate from the Dome of the Rock, and transferred it to Damascus.[122] [123] Schein also reported an Armenian source, which stated that Hethoum II, with a small force, had reached the outskirts of Cairo and then spent some fifteen days in Jerusalem visiting the Holy Places.[113][124]

"Jacques Molay takes Jerusalem, 1299", a painting created in the 1800s by Claude Jacquand, and hanging in the "Hall of Crusades" in Versailles. In reality, though the Mongols may have been in control of Jerusalem for a few months in early 1300, there are no sources affirming any kind of battle, and De Molay along with the bulk of the Templar forces were almost certainly on the island of Cyprus throughout this period, nowhere near the landlocked city of Jerusalem.[121][125]

Most scholars agree that whatever the facts involving Jerusalem, that the situation led to wild rumors in Europe. Though, there is disagreement as to the exact method that the information about the Holy Land was first communicated to Europe. According to Demurger in The Last Templar, the first announcement of the Mongol success was in a letter written in Cyprus in March 1300.[126] According to Schein, the earliest letter was dated March 19, 1300, and was probably based on accounts from Venetian merchants who had just arrived from Cyprus, which they had left on February 3, 1300.[127]

Demurger also documents that in February 1300, a Francisan monk in Nicosia, Cyprus wrote a letter saying that King Hethoum had celebrated mass in Jerusalem,[128] evidently at the Holy Sepulchre on January 6, 1300.[129][130] Demurger further reports a letter by a Thomas Gras, sent from Cyprus on March 24, 1300, stating that the Mongol Ghazan was asking the Crusaders to come to him "in Damas or Jerusalem" so that he could return the Holy Land to them.[131] There were also some contemporary Arab chroniclers from the 1300s, who mentioned that Jerusalem was one of the cities being raided at the time.[132][133]

One thing that is certain, is that the rumours spread and were inflated widely, due to wishful thinking, and the urban legend environment of large crowds that had gathered in Rome for the Jubilee. The story grew to say that the Mongols had taken Egypt, that the Mongol Ghazan had appointed his brother as the new king there, and that the Mongols were going to further conquer Barbary and Tunis. The rumors also stated that Ghazan had freed the Christians who were held captive in Damascus and in Egypt, and that some of those prisoners had already made their way to Cyprus. From Italy, the rumors spread to Austria and Germany, and then to France.

By April 1300, Pope Boniface was sending a letter announcing the "great and joyful news to be celebrated with special rejoicing,"[117] that the Mongol Ghazan had conquered the Holy Land and offered to hand it over to the Christians. In Rome, as part of the Jubilee celebrations in 1300, the Pope ordered processions to "celebrate the recovery of the Holy Land," and he further encouraged everyone to depart for the newly-recovered area. Edward I was asked to encourage his subjects to depart as well, to visit the Holy Places. And Pope Boniface even referred to the recovery of the Holy Land from the Mongols, in his bull Ausculta filii.

In the summer of the Jubilee year, Pope Boniface VIII received a dozen ambassadors, dispatched from various kings and princes. One of the groups was of 100 Mongols, led by the Florentine Guiscard Bustari, the ambassador for the il-khan. The embassy, abundantly mentioned in contemporary sources, participated in the Jubilee ceremonies. Supposedly this ambassador was also the man nominated by Ghazan to supervise the re-establishment of the Franks, in the territories that Ghazan was going to return to them. There was great rejoicing for a short time, but the Pope soon learned about the true state of affairs in Syria, from which in fact Ghazan had withdrawn the bulk of his forces in February 1300, and the Mamluks had reclaimed by May.[134]

The story of the 1299/1300 capture of Jerusalem was retold by historians during the following centuries,[121] and even expanded to claim that Jerusalem was taken not by Mongols, but by Jacques de Molay, Grand Master of the Knights Templar.[116] There is even a painting, Molay Prend Jerusalem, 1299, hanging in the French national museum in Versailles, created in 1846 by Claude Jacquand,[135] which depicts the supposed event in 1299.

Campaign of winter 1300-1301

According to Le Templier de Tyr, Ghazan sent ambassadors to Cyprus in 1300, led by the Italian Isol le Pisan, the Mongols' chief ambassador to Cyprus. In agreement with the Cypriotes, a joint embassy was then sent to the Pope.[136][137]

Frankish seaborne operations

Jacques de Molay was one of the leaders contacted by Ghazan, in an attempt to coordinate military operations

The Mongol leader Ghazan had sent letters in late 1299 requesting Frankish help, primarily with naval operations.[138] No assistance arrived for his attack on Syria in December 1299, but in July 1300, a fleet of sixteen galleys with some smaller vessels was equipped in Cyprus.[139][138][140] The fleet was commanded by King Henry II of Jerusalem, the king of Cyprus, accompanied by his brother, Amalric, Lord of Tyre; Jacques de Molay of the Templars; Isol le Pisan; and the head of the Hospitallers. According to the Templar of Tyre, the ships flew the banner of Ghazan.[138] The ships left Famagusta on July 20, 1300, to raid the coasts of Egypt and Syria: Rosette,[138] Alexandria, Acre, Tortosa, and Maraclea, before returning to Cyprus.[140]

Ruad bridgehead

When the ships arrived back in Cyprus, another message came from Ghazan asking to coordinate operations, inviting the Cypriots to meet him in Armenia.[140] The Cypriots then prepared a land-based force of approximately 600 men: 300 from Amalric of Lusigan, and similar contingents from the Templars and Hospitallers.[140] The men and their horses were ferried from Cyprus to a staging area on the island of Ruad, a mile off the coast of Tortosa.[138][140] From there, they had a certain amount of success attacking Tortosa (some sources say they engaged in raids, others that they captured the city), but when the hoped-for Mongol reinforcements were delayed (sources differ on whether the delay was caused by weather or illness), the Crusaders had to retreat to Ruad.[141][142] A few months later, in February 1301, the Mongols did arrive, but could do little else than engage in some raids around Syria, before they had to again withdraw. In mid-1301, the Egyptian Mamluks besieged the Crusader garrison on Ruad Island. The Crusaders, who had no source of fresh water, were able to hold out for nearly a year, but finally had to surrender. Many were killed, and the remaining few hundred survivors were sent to Cairo prisons.

Campaign of winter 1301-1302

Plans for combined operations were again made for the following winter offensive. A letter has been kept from Molay to Edward I, and dated April 8th, 1301, informing him of the troubles encountered by Ghazan, but announcing that Ghazan was supposed to come in Autumn:

"And our convent, with all our galleys and ships, transported itself to the island of Tortosa, in order to wait for the army of Ghazan and his Tatars."

— Jacques de Molay, letter to Edward I, April 8th, 1301.[143]

And in a letter to the king of Aragon a few months later:

"The king of Armenia sent his messengers to the king of Cyprus to tell him (...) that Ghazan was now close to arriving on the lands of the Sultan with a multitude of Tatars. And we, learning this, have the intention to go on the island of Tortosa where our convent has been stationned with weapons and horses during the present year, causing great devastation on the littoral, and capturing many Sarassins. We have the intention to get there and settle there, to wait for the Tatars."

— Jacques de Molay, letter to the king of Aragon, 1301.[144]
Seal of Ghazan, over the last two lines of his 1302 letter to Pope Boniface VIII. The seal, in Chinese script, reads "Seal certifying the authority of his Royal Highness to establish a country and govern its people". Vatican Archives.[145]

But this time again Ghazan did not appear with his troops.

On April 12th, 1302, Ghazan sent a letter and an embassy to Pope Boniface VIII, apparently in answer to an encouraging letter by the latter suggesting Western troops would be dispatched for the 1302/1303 offensive.[146] Ghazan's embassadors stayed at the court of Charles II of Anjou. When they returned to Persia after April 27th, 1303, they were accompanied by Gualterius de Lavendel, as embassador of Charles II to Ghazan.[147]

In September 1302 the Templars were driven out of Ruad by the attacking Mamluk forces from Egypt, and many were massacred when trapped on the island. The Mamluks enslaved the Templars and beheaded the Syrian footsoldiers.[148]

Campaign of winter 1302-1303

The remaining Templars from Cyprus continued making raids on the Syrian coast in early 1303, and ravaged the city of Damour, south of Beyrouth.[149] As they had lost Ruad, though, they were not capable of providing important troops.[150] This time however the Mongols appeared in great strength (about 80,000), but they were defeated at Homs on March 30th, and at the decisive Battle of Shaqhab, south of Damas, on April 21st.[151]

In 1303, Ghazan again sent a letter to Edward I, in the person of Buscarello de Ghizolfi, reinterating Hulagu's promise that they would give Jerusalem to the Franks in exchange for help against the Mamluks.[152]

Ghazan died on May 10th, 1304: dreams of a rapid reconquest of the Holy Land were destroyed.

Oljeitu and the failed Crusade project (1305-1313)

Oljeitu, also named Mohammad Khodabandeh, was the great-grandson of the Ilkhanate founder Hulagu, and brother and successor of Mahmud Ghazan. His Christian mother baptized him as a Christian and gave him the name Nicholas [citation needed]. In his youth he at first converted to Buddhism and then to Sunni Islam together with his brother Ghazan. He then changed his first name to the Islamic name Muhammad. In April 1305, Oljeitu sent letters the French king Philip the Fair,[153] the Pope, and Edward I of England. After his predecessor Arghun, he offered a military collaboration between the Christian nations of Europe and the Mongols against the Mamluks. He also explained that internal conflicts between the Mongols were over:

"Now all of us, Timur Khagan, Tchapar, Toctoga, Togba and ourselves, main descendants of Gengis-Khan, all of us, descendants and brothers, are reconciled through the inspiration and the help of God. So that, from Nangkiyan (China) in the Orient, to Lake Dala our people is united and the roads are open."

— Extract from the letter of Oljeitu to Philip the Fair. French national archives.[154]

European nations accordingly prepared a crusade, but were delayed. In the meantime Oljeitu launched a last campaign against the Mamluks (1312-13), in which he was unsuccessful. A settlement with the Mamluks would only be found when Oljeitu's son signed the Treaty of Aleppo with the Mamluks in 1322.[155]

Last contacts (1322)

The French Pope John XXII was the last to request the help of the Mongols in 1322.

In 1320, the Egyptian sultan Naser Mohammed ibn Kelaoun invaded and ravaged Christian Armenian Cilicia. In a letter dated July 1st, 1322, Pope John XXII sent a letter from Avignon to the Mongol ruler Abu Sa'id, reminding him of the alliance of his ancestors with Christians, asking him to intervene in Cilicia. At the same time he advocated that he abandon Islam in favor of Christianity. Mongol troops were sent to Cilicia, but only arrived after a ceasefire had been negotiated for 15 years between Constantin, patriarch of the Armenians, and the sultan of Egypt. After Abu Sa'id, relations between Christian princes and the Mongols were totally abandoned.[156]

He died without heir and successor. The state lost its status after his death, becoming a plethora of little kingdoms run by Mongols, Turks, and Persians.

Technology exchanges

In these invasions westward, the Mongols brought with them a variety of eastern, often Chinese technologies, which may have been transmitted to the West on these occasions. The original weaknesses of the Mongols in siege warfare (they were essentially a nation of horsemen) were compensated by the introduction of Chinese engineering corps within their army,[157] who therefore had ample contacts with Western lands.

Earliest picture of a European cannon, "De nobilitatibus, sapientiis et prudentiis regum" Walter de Milemete, 1326.

One theory of how gunpowder came to Europe is that it made its way along the Silk Road through the Middle East; another is that it was brought to Europe during the Mongol invasion in the first half of the 13th century.[158][159] Direct Franco-Mongol contacts occurred as in the 1259-1260 military alliance of the Franks knights of the ruler of Antioch Bohemond VI and his father-in-law Hetoum I with the Mongols under Hulagu.[37] William of Rubruck, an ambassador to the Mongols in 1254-1255, a personal friend of Roger Bacon, is also often designated as a possible intermediary in the transmission of gunpowder know-how between the East and the West.[160]

Other innovations, such as printing, may have transited through the Mongol routes during that period.

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Between the 11th to the 15th century, the Crusaders were usually called Franks. The term led to derived usage by other cultures, such as Farangi, firang, farang and barang[citation needed]
  2. ^ "On 1 March Kitbuqa entered Damascus at the head of a Mongol army. With him were the King of Armenia and the prince of Antioch. The citizens of the ancient capital of the Caliphate saw for the first time for six centuries three Christian potentates ride in triumph through their streets", Runciman p.307
  3. ^ Weatherford, p. 58
  4. ^ "The Keraits, who were a semi-nomadic people of Turkish origin, inhabited the country round the Orkhon river in modern Outer Mongolia. Early in the eleventh century their ruler had been converted to Nestorian Christianity, together with most of his subjects; and the conversion brought the Keraits into touch with the Uighur Turks, amongst whom were many Nestorians", Runciman, p.238
  5. ^ "In 1196, Gengis Khan succeeded in the unification under his authority of all the Mongol tribes, some of which had been converted to Nestorian Christianity" "Les Croisades, origines et conséquences", p.74
  6. ^ Weatherford, pp. 160-161
  7. ^ "In 1196, Gengis Khan succeeded in the unification under his authority of all the Mongol tribes, some of which had been converted to Nestorian Christianity" "Les Croisades, origines et conséquences", p.74
  8. ^ "Early in 1253 a report reached Acre that one of the Mongol princes, Sartaq, son of Batu, had been converted to Christianity", Runciman, p.280
  9. ^ "Kitbuqa, as a Christian himself, made no secret of his sympathies", Runciman, p.308
  10. ^ Under Mongka "The chief religious influence was that of the Nestorian Christians, to whom Mongka showed especial favour in memory of his mother Sorghaqtani, who had always remained loyal to her faith" Runciman, p.296
  11. ^ a b c d Adam Knobler (Fall 1996). "Pseudo-Conversions and Patchwork Pedigrees: The Christianization of Muslim Princes and the Diplomacy of Holy War". Journal of World History. 7 (2): 181–197. {{cite journal}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |journal= (help)
  12. ^ Regesta Honorii Papae III, no 1478, I, p.565. Quoted in Runciman, p.246
  13. ^ Runciman, p. 246
  14. ^ Runciman, p.246-247
  15. ^ Runciman, p.249
  16. ^ Runciman, p.250
  17. ^ Runciman, p.253
  18. ^ Runciman, p.256
  19. ^ Runciman, p.254
  20. ^ Sharan Newman, "Real History Behind the Templars" p. 174, about Grand Master Thomas Berard: "Under Genghis Khan, they [the Mongols] had already conquered much of China and were now moving into the ancient Persian Empire. Tales of their cruelty flew like crows through the towns in their path. However, since they were considered "pagans" there was hope among the leaders of the Church that they could be brought into the Christian community and would join forces to liberate Jerusalem again. Franciscan missionaries were sent east as the Mongols drew near."
  21. ^ Catholic Encyclopedia, "The Crusades"
  22. ^ David Wilkinson, Studying the History of Intercivilizational Dialogues [1]
  23. ^ Quoted in Michaud, Yahia (Oxford Centre for Islamic Studies) (2002). Ibn Taymiyya, Textes Spirituels I-XVI". Chap XI
  24. ^ Muncinis, p.259
  25. ^ David Wilkinson, Studying the History of Intercivilizational Dialogues [2]
  26. ^ Muncinis, p.259
  27. ^ Peter Jackson (July 1980). "The Crisis in the Holy Land in 1260". The English Historical Review. 95 (376): 481–513.
  28. ^ Grousset, p.523
  29. ^ The Memoirs of the Lord of Joinville
  30. ^ Runciman, p.260
  31. ^ "The Memoirs of the Lord of Joinville", Chap. V, Jean de Joinville.The Memoirs of the Lord of Joinville
  32. ^ Runciman, p279-280
  33. ^ Runciman, p.380
  34. ^ J. Richard, 1970, p. 202., Encyclopedia Iranica, [3]
  35. ^ "Bohemond VI etait present a Baghdad en 1258" Demurger, p.55
  36. ^ "A history of the Crusades", Steven Runciman, p.306
  37. ^ a b Grousset, p. 581
  38. ^ "The king of Armenia and the Prince of Antioch went to the army of the Tatars, and they all went off to take Damascus".|Gestes des Chiprois, Le Templier de Tyr. "Le roy d'Arménie et le Prince d'Antioche alèrent en l'ost des Tatars et furent à prendre Damas". Quoted in "Histoire des Croisades III", Rene Grousset, p586
  39. ^ Runciman, p.306
  40. ^ Online Reference Book for Medieval studies
  41. ^ Runciman, p.310
  42. ^ Encyclopedia Iranica article
  43. ^ Runciman, p.312
  44. ^ Encyclopedia Iranica article
  45. ^ Runciman, p.313
  46. ^ "In the year 1262, the sultan Bendocdar of Babiloine, who had taken the name of Melec el Vaher, put the city of Antioch under siege, but the king of Armenia went to see the Tatars and had them come, so that the Sarazins had to leave the siege and return to Babiloine.". Original French:"Et en lan de lincarnasion .mcc. et .lxii. le soudan de Babiloine Bendocdar quy se fist nomer Melec el Vaher ala aseger Antioche mais le roy dermenie si estoit ale a Tatars et les fist ehmeuer de venir et les Sarazins laiserent le siege dantioche et sen tornerent en Babiloine."Guillame de Tyr "Historia rerum in partibus transmarinis gestarum" #316
  47. ^ "Grousset, p565
  48. ^ Quoted in Grousset, p.565
  49. ^ Runciman, 325-327
  50. ^ Quoted in Grousset, p.650
  51. ^ Runciman, p.337
  52. ^ Grousset, p.650
  53. ^ Runciman, p334
  54. ^ Runciman, p.320
  55. ^ Runciman, p330-331
  56. ^ Quoted in Grousset, p.644
  57. ^ Grousset, p.647
  58. ^ "A history of the Crusades", Steven Runciman, p.332
  59. ^ "A history of the Crusades", Steven Runciman, p.332
  60. ^ Grousset, p.656
  61. ^ "Edward was horrified at the state of affairs in Outremer. He knew that his own army was small, but he hoped to unite the Christians of the East into a formidable body and then to use the help of the Mongols in making an effective attack on Baibars", Runciman, p.335
  62. ^ a b c Grousset, p.653. Grousset quote a contemporary source ("Eracles", p.461) explaining that Edward contacted the Mongols "por querre secors" ("To ask for help")
  63. ^ a b c Runciman, p.336
  64. ^ a b Runciman, p.337
  65. ^ Quoted in Grousset, p.689
  66. ^ Grousset, p.687
  67. ^ "The Crusades Through Arab Eyes", p. 253: The fortress of Marqab was held by the Knights Hospitallers, called al-osbitar by the Arabs, "These monk-knigts had supported the Mongols wholeheartedly, going so far as to fight alongside them during a fresh attempted invasion in 1281."
  68. ^ a b "Mangu Timur commanded the Mongol centre, with other Mongol princes on his left, and on his right his Georgian auxiliaries, with King Leo and the Hospitallers", Runciman, p391-392
  69. ^ Original French:"En lan de .m. et .cc. et .lxxxi. de lincarnasion de Crist les Tatars nyssirent de lor terres et passerent les Aygues Froides a mout grant host et coururent la terre de Halape et de Haman et de La Chemele et la saresterent et firent grant damage as Sarazins et en tuerent ases et fu le roy dermenie aveuc yaus et aucuns chevaliers frans de Surie." Guillame de Tyr "Historia rerum in partibus transmarinis gestarum". Nota: "Aucuns" means "several", "some" in 13th century French Online French dictionary, and is always used with this meaning in Le Chevalier de Tyre.
  70. ^ Runciman, p.398
  71. ^ "The Crusades Through Arab Eyes" p. 254: Arghun, grandon of Hulegu, "had resurrected the most cherished dream of his predecessors: to form an alliance with the Occidentals and thus to trap the Mamluk sultanate in a pincer movement. Regular contacts were established between Tabriz and Rome with a view to organizing a joint expedition, or at least a concerted one."
  72. ^ Quote in "Histoires des Croisades III", Rene Grousset, p700
  73. ^ French original:"Cestu Argon ama mout les crestiens et plusors fois manda au pape et au roy de France trayter coment yaus et luy puissent de tout les Sarazins destruire" Guillame de Tyr (William of Tyre) "Historia rerum in partibus transmarinis gestarum" #591
  74. ^ Runciman, p.398
  75. ^ Boyle, in Camb. Hist. Iran V, pp. 370-71; Budge, pp. 165-97. Source
  76. ^ http://www.aina.org/books/mokk/mokk.htm
  77. ^ http://www.aina.org/books/mokk/mokk.htm
  78. ^ "Histoires des Croisades III", Rene Grousset, quoting "La Flor des Estoires d'Orient" by Haiton
  79. ^ "The Monks of Kublai Khan Emperor of China", Sir E. A. Wallis Budge Source
  80. ^ Runciman, p.401
  81. ^ Runciman, p.401
  82. ^ Alternative translation of Arghun's letter
  83. ^ For another translation here
  84. ^ "Histoire des Croisades III", Rene Grousset.
  85. ^ Runciman, p.402
  86. ^ Runciman, p.412
  87. ^ "Had the Mongol alliance been achieved and honestly implemented by the West, the existence of Outremer would almost certainly have been prolonged. The Mamluks would have been crippled if not destroyed; and the Ilknate of Persia would have survived as a power friendly to the Christians and the West". Runciman, p.402
  88. ^ Demurger, p.139 "During four years, Jacques de Molay and his order were totally committed, with other Christian forces of Cyprus and Armenia, to an enterprise of reconquest of the Holy Land, in liaison with the offensives of Ghazan, the Mongol Khan of Persia.
  89. ^ "L’ordre du Temple et son dernier grand maître, Jacques de Molay, ont été les artisans de l’alliance avec les Mongols de Perse contre les Mamelouks en 1299-1303, afin de reprendre pied en Terre sainte." Alain Demurger, Master of Conference at Université Paris-I, author of « Chevaliers du Christ. Les ordres religieux militaires au Moyen Age » (Seuil, 2002), « Jacques de Molay. Le crépuscule des Templiers » (Payot, 2002) « Les Templiers. Une chevalerie chrétienne au Moyen Age » (Seuil), in an interview with Le Point Source
  90. ^ "The Trial of the Templars", Malcolm Barber, 2nd edition, page 22: "The aim was to link up with Ghazan, the Mongol Il-Khan of Persia, who had invited the Cypriots to participate in joint operations against the Mamluks".
  91. ^ Demurger, p.142-143
  92. ^ Hayton of Corycus mentions "Otton de Grandson and the Masters of the Temple and of the Hospitallers as well as their convents, who were at that time [1298 or 1299] in these regions [Cilician Armenia]", quoted in Demurger, p.116
  93. ^ Newman, p. 231, that says that De Molay had an "ill-fated expedition to Armenia around 1299, in which the last Templar holding in that kingdom was lost."
  94. ^ Demurger, p.142
  95. ^ "Real History Behind the Templars" p. 231 (about Grand Master Jacques de Molay): "Jacques returned to Cyprus in late 1296 and stayed in the East for the next ten years. He conducted naval raids on Egypt and participated in another ill-fated expedition to Armenia around 1299, in which the last Templar holding in that kingdom was lost".
  96. ^ Demurger, p.143
  97. ^ Demurger, p.142
  98. ^ "He (Ghazan) was soon joined by king Hethoum, among whose forces were apparently Hospitallers and Templars of the kingdom of Armenia, who participated to the remainder of the campaign" Demurger, p.142
  99. ^ Demurger, p.142
  100. ^ "For a brief period, some four months in all, the Mongol Il-Khan was de facto the lord of the Holy Land", Schein, p810
  101. ^ Demurger 142-143
  102. ^ Runciman, p.439
  103. ^ "Ibn Kathir attributes partially the responsibility of these massacres and destructions to the Georgian and Armenian Chritians that were accompanying the Mongols", "Textes Spirituels D'Ibn Taymiyya", Chap XI
  104. ^ "Adh-Dhababi's Record of the Destruction of Damascus by the Mongols in 1299-1301", Note 18, p.359
  105. ^ "Meanwhile the Mongol and Armenian troops raided the country as far south as Gaza." Schein, 1979, p. 810
  106. ^ "He pursued the Sarazins as far as Gaza, and then turn to Damas, conquering and destroying the Sarazins". Original French: "Il chevaucha apres les Sarazins jusques a Guadres et puis se mist vers Domas concuillant et destruyant les Sarazins." Le Templier de Tyr, #609
  107. ^ "In 1300 (...) the Mongols made 100,000 captives among the Muslims. In Jerusalem, in Jabal al-Salihiya, in Naplouse, in Homs, in Daraya and elsewere, they killed and made a number of captives that only God can reckon" Ibn Tamiyya, circa 1300, Chap 11, p.67 Ibn Tamiyya, Chap 11, p.67
  108. ^ "The Tatars then made a raid against Jerusalem and against the city of Khalil. They massacred the inhabitants of these two cities (...) it is impossible to describe the amount of atrocities, destructions, plundering they did, the number of prisonners, children and women, they took as slaves". Ibn Abi L-Fada'Il, Histoire, Transl. Blochet t.XIV, p.667, quotes in Ibn Taymiyya, Textes Spirituels, Chap XI
  109. ^ "Ghazan dispatched messengers to the kings of Jerusalem and Cyprus, and to the communes and to the religious orders, asking them to come to him in Damas or Jerusalem, so that he could remit to them all the lands the Christians held at the time of Godefroy de Bouillon". Letter of Thomas Gras, Cyprus, March 24, 1300
  110. ^ Chroniques de France, edited by Jules Viard: "Et a Pasques ensivant, si comme l'en dit, en Jherusalem le service de Dieu les crestiens avec exaltacion de grant joie celebrerent". Quoted in Demurger, p.280
  111. ^ Demurger, p.146
  112. ^ "611. Ghazan, we he had vanquished the Sarazins returned in his country, and left in Damas one of his Admirals, who was named Molay, who had with him 10,000 Tatars and 4 general."611. Cacan quant il eut desconfit les Sarazins se retorna en son pais et laissa a Domas .i. sien amiraill en son leuc quy ot a nom Molay qui ot o luy .xm. Tatars et .iiii. amiraus."
  113. ^ a b Schein, 1979, p. 810
  114. ^ Demurger, p.144
  115. ^ "After Ghazan had left, some Christians from Cyprus arrived in Gibelet and Nefin, led by Guy, Count of Jaffa, and Jean d'Antioche with their knights, and from there proceeded to go to Armenia where the camp of the Tatars was. But Ghazan was gone, so they had to return."|Le Templier de Tyr, 614. - Le Templier de Tyr, 614: "Et apres que Cazan fu partis aucuns crestiens de Chipre estoient ales a Giblet et a Nefin et en seles terres de seles marines les quels vous nomeray: Guy conte de Jaffe et messire Johan dantioche et lor chevaliers; et de la cuyderent aler en Ermenie quy estoit a lost des Tatars. Cazan sen estoit retornes: il se mist a revenir"
  116. ^ a b "Le grand-maître s'etait trouvé avec ses chevaliers en 1299 à la reprise de Jerusalem", François Raynouard (1805). "Précis sur les Templiers".
  117. ^ a b "In 1300 a rumour swept the West that the Mongols had conquered Palestine and handed it over to the Christians. Pope Boniface VIII sent 'the great and joyful news' to Edward of England and probably to Philip of France as well. He encouraged the faithful to go at once to the Holy Land and he ordered the exiled Catholic bishops to return to their sees. All over Europe men hurriedly took the cross and in Genoa several ladies sold their jewelry to help pay for a crusading fleet, although in the end the project was dropped." (Riley-Smith, p. 246)
  118. ^ Schein, 1979, p. 805
  119. ^ The Mongols by David Morgan, p. 161. "Indeed, at one point Europe was swept with rumours that the Mongols had actually taken Jerusalem from the Mamluks and had returned it to Christian rule. Although this had not in fact happened, the stories did reflect the reality of Ghazan's remarkable successes in 1299-1300 when he drove the Mamluk forces completely out of Syria, only to withdraw again to Persia."Source
  120. ^ Jotischky, The Crusaders and the Crusader States, p. 249
  121. ^ a b c Schein, 1979, Gesta Dei per Mongolos
  122. ^ "The conquest of Jerusalem by the Mongols was confirmed by Niccolo of Poggibonsi who noted (Libro d'Oltramare 1346-1350, ed. P. B. Bagatti (Jerusalem 1945), 53, 92) that the Mongols removed a gate from the Dome of the Rock and had it transferred to Damascus. Schein-1991, p. 163
  123. ^ "In a letter dated 3 October 1301, Ghazan was accused by the Sultan al-Malik an-Nasir of introducing the Christian Armenians and Georgians into Jerusalem 'the most holy sanctuary to Islam, second only to Mecca!". Schein, 1979, p. 810.
  124. ^ See "The Armenian Kingdom and the Mamluks" by Angus Donal, in which he notes that the earliest Armenian account "has been accepted as genuine by at least one modern historian of the period."
  125. ^ Le Templier de Tyr mentions that one of the generals of Ghazan was named Molay, whom he left in Damas with 10,000 Mongols - "611. Ghazan, we he had vanquished the Sarazins returned in his country, and left in Damas one of his Admirals, who was named Molay, who had with him 10,000 Tatars and 4 general."611. Cacan quant il eut desconfit les Sarazins se retorna en son pais et laissa a Domas .i. sien amiraill en son leuc quy ot a nom Molay qui ot o luy .xm. Tatars et .iiii. amiraus.", but it is thought that this could instead designate a Mongol general "Mûlay". - Demurger, p.279
  126. ^ Demurger, p. 145
  127. ^ "The earliest letter was dated 19 March 1300 and addressed to Boniface VIII. Its contents suggest that it was probably written by the Doge Pietro Gradenigo (1289-1311). - Schein, 1979, p. 814
  128. ^ A letter from a Franciscan monk in Nicosia, dated February 4, 1300, relates that Hethoum celebrated mass in Jerusalem and informs that "Our Minister and a lot of our brothers are preparing to go to Syria, together with Knights and soldiers, and all the others of the religious orders". Quoted in Demurger, p.145
  129. ^ Demurger, p.143: "There is a tradition that Hethoum celebrated a religious office at the Saint-Sepulcre on the day of the Epiphany (January 6th)."
  130. ^ Another report said that Christians were in Jerusalem in April to celebrate Easter. - Chroniques de France, edited by Jules Viard: "Et a Pasques ensivant, si comme l'en dit, en Jherusalem le service de Dieu les crestiens avec exaltacion de grant joie celebrerent". Quoted in Demurger, p.280
  131. ^ Demurger, p.145. "Ghazan dispatched messengers to the kings of Jerusalem and Cyprus, and to the communes and to the religious orders, asking them to come to him in Damas or Jerusalem, so that he could remit to them all the lands the Christians held at the time of Godefroy de Bouillon". - Letter of Thomas Gras, Cyprus, March 24, 1300
  132. ^ "In 1300 (...) the Mongols made 100,000 captives among the Muslims. In Jerusalem, in Jabal al-Salihiya, in Naplouse, in Homs, in Daraya and elsewere, they killed and made a number of captives that only God can reckon"|Ibn Tamiyya, circa 1300, Chap 11, p.67 Ibn Tamiyya, Chap 11, p.67
  133. ^ "The Tatars then made a raid against Jerusalem and against the city of Khalil. They massacred the inhabitants of these two cities (...) it is impossible to describe the amount of atrocities, destructions, plundering they did, the number of prisonners, children and women, they took as slaves".|Ibn Abi L-Fada'Il, Histoire, Transl. Blochet - Ibn Abi L-Fada'Il, Histoire, Trad. Blochet, t.XIV, p.667, quotes in Ibn Taymiyya, Textes Spirituels, Chap XI
  134. ^ Schein, p.815-816
  135. ^ Claudius Jacquand (1846). "Jacques Molay Prend Jerusalem.1299" (painting). Hall of Crusades, Versailles. Retrieved 2007-09-09.
  136. ^ Demurger, p.146
  137. ^ Demurger, p.136. "From the Tatars, the king of Armenia, the king of Cyprus, the Great Master of the Templars or other nobles from Outremer, are arriving embassadors on a visit to the Pope. They are already in Apulia and should reach the Pope in the next few days" - Letter by Romeu de Marimundo, counsellor of the king of Aragon, dated July 2nd, 1300, in Barcelona.
  138. ^ a b c d e Demurger, p.147
  139. ^ According to the "Chronicle of Cyprus", by Florio Bustron, quoted in in "Adh-Dhababi's Record of the Destruction of Damascus by the Mongols in 1299-1301", Note 18, p.359
  140. ^ a b c d e Schein, 1979, p. 811
  141. ^ "The Trial of the Templars", Malcolm Barber, 2nd edition, page 22: "In November, 1300, James of Molay and the king's brother, Amaury of Lusignan, attempted to occupy the former Templar stronghold of Tortosa. A force of 600 men, of which the Templars supplied about 150, failed to establish itself in the town itself, although they were able to leave a garrison of 120 men on the island of Ruad, just off the coast.
  142. ^ "That year [1300], a message came to Cyprus from Ghazan, king of the Tatars, saying that he would come during the winter, and that he wished that the Franks join him in Armenia (...) Amalric of Lusignan, Constable of the Kingdom of Jerusalem, arrived in November (...) and brought with him 300 knights, and as many or more of the Templars and Hospitallers (...) In February a great admiral of the Tatars, named Cotlesser, came to Antioch with 60,000 horsemen, and requested the visit of the king of Armenia, who came with Guy of Ibelin, Count of Jaffa, and John, lord of Giblet. And when they arrived, Cotelesse told them that Ghazan had met great trouble of wind and cold on his way. Cotlesse raided the land from Haleppo to La Chemelle, and returned to his country without doing more". - Le Templier de Tyre, Chap 620-622. Quoted in Demurger, p.147. Original:Guillame de Tyr (William of Tyre), Historia rerum in partibus transmarinis gestarum #620-622
  143. ^ Quoted in Demurger, p.154
  144. ^ Demurger, p.154-155
  145. ^ Michaud, Yahia (Oxford Centre for Islamic Studies) (2002). Ibn Taymiyya, Textes Spirituels I-XVI", Chap. XI
  146. ^ "Ghazan's letter to Boniface VIII, dated 12 April, 1302, suggests that, having received an encouraging letter from the Pope, he counted on Christian participation in his expedition to Syria in 1303.
  147. ^ Schein, p.813
  148. ^ "Nearly 40 of these men were still in prison in Cairo years later where, according to a former fellow prisoner, the Genoese Matthew Zaccaria, they died of starvation, having refused an offer of 'many riches and goods' in return for apostasising"" The Trial of the Templars, Malcolm Barber, p.22
  149. ^ Demurger, p158
  150. ^ Demurger, p158
  151. ^ Demurger, p.158
  152. ^ Encyclopedia Iranica article
  153. ^ Mostaert and Cleaves, pp. 56-57, Encyclopedia Iranica
  154. ^ Les hégémonies mongoles
  155. ^ Mostaert and Cleaves, pp. 56-57, Encyclopedia Iranica
  156. ^ Les hégémonies mongoles
  157. ^ "Atlas des Croisades", p.112
  158. ^ Norris 2003:11
  159. ^ Chase 2003:58
  160. ^ "The Eastern Origins of Western Civilization", John M.Hobson, p186, ISBN 0521547245

References

  • "Adh-Dhababi's Record of the Destruction of Damascus by the Mongols in 1299-1301" Translated by Joseph Somogyi. From: Ignace Goldziher Memorial Volume, Part 1, Online
  • "Atlas des Croisades", Jonathan Riley-Smith, Editions Autrement, ISBN 2862605530
  • Barber, Malcolm (1978), "The Trial of the Templars", 2nd edition, (Cambridge)
  • "The Monks of Kublai Khan Emperor of China", Sir E. A. Wallis Budge. Online
  • Budge, Sir E.A. Wallis. The history and Life of Rabban Bar Sauma". {{cite book}}: |format= requires |url= (help) (online)
  • Grousset, Rene (1935). Histoire des Croisades III, 1188-1291". Editions Perrin. ISBN 226202569. {{cite book}}: Check |isbn= value: length (help)
  • Encyclopedia Iranica, Article on Franco-Persian relations
  • Foltz, Richard (2000). "Religions of the Silk Road : overland trade and cultural exchange from antiquity to the fifteenth century". New York: St. Martin's Griffin. ISBN 0-312-23338-8.
  • Demurger, Alain (2007). Jacques de Molay. Editions Payot&Rivages. ISBN 2228902357.
  • Hazard, Harry W. (editor) (1975). Volume III: The Fourteenth and Fifteenth Centuries. A History of the Crusades. Kenneth M. Setton, general editor. The University of Wisconsin Press. ISBN 0-299-06670-3. {{cite book}}: |author= has generic name (help)
  • Lebédel, Claude (2006). Les Croisades, origines et conséquences. Editions Ouest-France. ISBN 2737341361.
  • Maalouf, Amin (1984). The Crusades Through Arab Eyes. New York: Schocken Books. ISBN 0-8052-0898-4.
  • Newman, Sharan (2006). Real History Behind the Templars. Berkley Publishing Group. ISBN 978-0-425-21533-3.
  • Riley-Smith, Jonathan (1987, 2005). The Crusades: A History (2nd edition ed.). Yale Nota Bene. ISBN 0-300-10128-7. {{cite book}}: |edition= has extra text (help); Check date values in: |date= (help)
  • Schein, Sylvia (October 1979). "Gesta Dei per Mongolos 1300. The Genesis of a Non-Event". The English Historical Review. 94 (373): 805–819.
  • Schein, Sylvia (1991). Fideles Crucis: The Papacy, the West, and the Recovery of the Holy Land. Clarendon. ISBN 0198221657.
  • Runciman, Steven (1987 (first published in 1952-1954)). A history of the Crusades 3. Penguin Books. ISBN 9780140137057. {{cite book}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  • Weatherford, Jack (2004). Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern World. Three Rivers Press. ISBN 0-609-80964-4.
  • Wood, Frances (2002). The Silk Road. University of California Press. ISBN 0520243404.
  • Michaud, Yahia (Oxford Centre for Islamic Studies) (2002). Ibn Taymiyya, Textes Spirituels I-XVI". "Le Musulman", Oxford-Le Chebec.

External links